Letters to the Press (contd.)

PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 14, 2008 - JULY 8, 2010: Type and Yields of Nuclear Weapons to Destroy New Delhi and the United States
In the nuclear destruction of New Delhi, the two complexes to focus on destroying are:
i) RAW headquarters on Lodhi Road : 28 degrees 35 minutes North, 77 degrees 14 minutes East
ii) North Block and South Block on Raisina Hill : 28 degrees 37 minutes North, 77 degrees 12 minutes East
(More precise coordinates are available).
The distance between them is of the order of three miles. A single blast in the megaton range can do the job or two blasts of even twenty kilotons each. As I have said, ideally the entire population of New Delhi/ Delhi should be killed, but it is not necessary. The type, yield and number of nuclear weapon(s) is a matter of convenience as is the mode of delivery. Neutron-type weapons designed for use against cities and population centers become important when thousands of nuclear weapons are later detonated to destroy the United States. But one or two nuclear weapons detonated to destroy New Delhi need not be of any particular type.
The fact that thousands of nuclear warheads -- neutron-type weapons designed to be effective over as large an area as possible per warhead -- will be exploded to destroy the United States means that the vast majority of the missiles carrying them need not be precisely guided to a target; even a deviation of a few miles from the nominal target would not matter so long as together they cover, in a statistical sense, the populated areas of the continental United States; only a few missiles may need to be guided accurately to ensure that some selected targets are destroyed. The task thus becomes one of producing a large number of warheads and a large number of missiles that can take them to the continental United States but which need not be guided very accurately. The large numbers of missiles and warheads, because of their large numbers, cannot be stopped by anti-ballistic missile (ABM) systems the United States has or will have in the foreseeable future, further simplifying the task. Time is important so that these large numbers of warheads and missiles are produced and launched as quickly as possible. I have already said that the emphasis should be on road and rail mobile ICBMs or concealed silo-based missiles that can be quickly produced in large numbers rather than on nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed submarines (SSBNs) which take a long time to produce. Equally important is getting enough fissile material for the necessary number of warheads for which all of India’s nuclear reactors will be operated in the military mode. The sooner the nuclear destruction of New Delhi occurs, the sooner India can get on with the main task since time -- doing this quickly -- is as important as producing a large number of missiles and warheads.
I have referred to neutron-type (that is, enhanced radiation) weapons designed for use against cities and population centers; more of their energy goes into producing deadly radiation (fast neutrons) and less into producing heat and blast. But even if regular kinds of thermonuclear weapons (rather than enhanced radiation weapons) are used, five thousand such warheads of two hundred kilotons each, targeted at the four thousand largest population centers in the United States -- the larger cities will have more than one warhead assigned to them -- will have a total yield of one thousand megatons, that is the combined yield of twenty of the fifty megaton hydrogen bomb the Soviet Union once tested and these five thousand warheads will do a good job of destroying the United States. So even for destroying the United States, the regular kind of thermonuclear weapons can be used rather than neutron-type weapons.
There are substantial distances between population centers in the United States even in its thickly populated areas such as the East Coast, so the regular kind of thermonuclear weapons will be properly targeted and guided and, since the United States can be expected to start putting out erroneous coordinates for its population centers, their coordinates should be obtained from present or past paper, not future or electronic, sources -- unless India’s own satellites are the source and the coordinates are cross-checked for fudging by traitors because Government of India traitors through ISRO launched an Israeli spy satellite of the kind that the U.S. National Security Agency/ C.I.A.-RAW have been using to do immense damage to India, India’s greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian for the past 31 years, etc. and billions are poured into Israeli radars, etc., instead of Indian R & D by Government of India traitors, though all this will come to an end with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi -- and it is not too early to start compiling lists of five thousand targets and their coordinates, starting with the largest cities; Manhattan island alone in New York City will need to be targeted at at least three points. Even today, in this age of highly accurate missiles carrying multiple warheads, Russia has some ICBMs equipped with a single twenty or twenty five megaton warhead because of their utility in destroying large cities but India can do the job with multiple warheads of lower yields, thoroughly tested to their full yields, of course.
There are various distractions such as terrorism -- I have said almost all terrorism and separatism in India since 1983 has been sponsored by the C.I.A. -- K. Subrahmanyam has been the kingpin of all this C.I.A.-sponsored terrorism and separatism in India, not just in Sri Lanka and East Pakistan and in even more serious crimes than terrorism and separatism against India; why doesn’t someone torture him and investigate him? I can provide a lot of evidence, though I know that only the nuclear destruction of New Delhi will do the job -- through RAW and other intelligence agencies in the region using several layers of intermediaries in various religious groups, army officers, corporate houses, politicians and others -- and piracy, which is sea-based terrorism sponsored by the C.I.A. and, like the land-based terrorism, aims to draw India into a U.S.-led war on terrorism and piracy. C.I.A.-RAW are extremely skillful in buying or gaining the confidence of people by various means; to take one example out of hundreds, they have recently silenced a critic of the nuclear deal by getting his book published in the United States (a tactic they used with a Japanese academic, for example, who was shocked by Harvard University’s and the C.I.A.’s “sensational” crimes against an Indian scientist, by having his book published by the Harvard University Press, etc.), having him host Americans for a conference and with RAW feeding him disinformation which he now proudly cites as being from ’intelligence sources’ -- as well as in creating public distractions by terrorist acts, separatist movements, etc., but India has to focus like a laser beam on the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then of the United States.
ADDED ON NOVEMBER 27, 2008: Objectives of C.I.A.-RAW-Staged Terrorist Attacks In Mumbai :
K. Subrahmanyam and C.I.A.-RAW have eliminated the Bombay Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) Chief in their latest terrorist act in Bombay which had more than one objectives but one of which was forestalling an investigation of K. Subrahmanyam -- the king-pin of C.I.A.-RAW operations in India including all terrorism and separatism in India since 1983 -- which I referred to above in this press release.
[Post on Bharat-Rakshak online discussion forum: ] “Times Now reporting US intel officials were present at the Taj at the time of the attack and might have been injured or killed”. It is the Indian equivalent of the U.S. intelligence attack on the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad (see Press Release dated September 22, 2008 below).
[Post on Bharat-Rakshak: ] “there was a story on air for just a few minutes and then it was pulled. It talked about a female editor in the Times of India was inside the Taj (Oberoi?) and coordinated the attacks from there. She then reportedly disappeared. her. Anybody has any information? The media is obviously blacking out this news”.
As I have said below, the Times of India is RAW’s principal mouthpiece and K. Subrahmanyam has been a “Consulting Editor” there; RAW operatives who act as moderators on Bharat-Rakshak and control the forum locked this thread away and covered up this post.
The United States’ FBI and Israel’s commandos must NOT be allowed to operate in India; one of the objectives of this C.I.A.-Mossad-RAW operation is to bring India further into the U.S.-Israel colonial ambit with bases in India, predator strikes, as in Pakistan and the rest.
ADDED ON NOVEMBER 29, 2008: The superb job done by India’s commandos and their heroism does nothing about either terrorism or India’s bigger problems: just as the LTTE terrorists and suicide bombers, despite their bravery and heroism -- remember the expression on the face of the severed head of the woman who bent to touch Rajiv Gandhi’s feet as she activated the switch which blew herself, Rajiv Gandhi and many others to bits -- are creations of and puppets in the hands of C.I.A.-RAW, as were the other Tamil groups in Sri Lanka which fought and were eliminated by the LTTE, the extraordinary courage and heroism of the terrorists in the current Mumbai operation -- outnumbered a thousand to one -- is a product of, as they were puppets in the hands of, C.I.A.-RAW. The C.I.A. has the same role in, for example, Shia-Sunni conflicts in Iraq, Pakistan, etc. RAW is a servant and branch of the C.I.A. and the role of the C.I.A. as the perpetrator of the Mumbai terrorism operation and countless other terrorist operations in India since 1983 and of incomparably more injurious operations against India, described below, has no place in the media (which C.I.A.-RAW control), in the public’s consciousness or in India’s plans except in the plans described in this press release and the press releases below -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then of the United States -- and India has to focus like a laser beam on these plans.
ADDED DECEMBER 1, 2008: According to press reports, a United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) team arrived on Sunday to Mumbai uninvited, ‘brusquely’ (The Telegraph, December 1 ‘08, Internet) told Indian officials they are U.S. government officials and do not need any papers to come and (Indian Express, December 1 ‘08, Internet) “was in a day-long meeting with the Director General of Police, Mumbai Commissioner of Police and senior officials from the Crime Branch…The team is in the process of examining evidence and remnants of explosives gathered from the targeted places and the methodology used by the militants, official sources said … The FBI would be investigating the case from their side as six American nationals were killed in the attacks …”. No matter which country’s nationals are killed in a sovereign country, including the United States, it is that country itself which investigates it. The Director General of Police and other officials being in a day-long meeting with the FBI team amounts to the Indian officials ‘reporting’ to the FBI which has no right to investigate “from their side” or any side. They should have no access to the evidence, “remnants of explosives” or anything. They should not have even been allowed into India. This is a flagrant surrender of India’s sovereignty to an American invasion which must be immediately repelled by whatever means necessary and the Indian government officials punished for high treason. If the Indian armed forces want to show they exist to defend India, now is the time for them to act with force, arrest the invading Americans and punish them as any foreign invaders would be punished.
FURTHER ADDED ON DECEMBER 1, 2008: The United States’ sending its Secretary of State, Rice, to India on Wednesday to show “solidarity” with India is exactly like the United States launching a Predator attack on Pakistan, violating its sovereignty, just as the Pakistani president or prime minister was meeting Bush in Washington and another Predator attack on Pakistan while a top U.S. admiral or other high military officer was in Pakistan meeting top Pakistani officials telling them the United States respects Pakistan’s sovereignty: to make Pakistan accept the military attack on its territory and violation of its sovereignty and to bring Pakistan into a colonial relationship with the United States, as during the British rule over India several Indian maharajahs were given 21-gun salutes and treated as nominal ‘sovereigns’ by the British while British ‘Residents’ supervised them, allowing their native puppets to save face. Nothing has changed since then and the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then of the United States is meant to change that.
According to an Associated Press report, Obama today told reporters at a news conference “The situation in South Asia as a whole and the safe havens for terrorists that have been established there represent the single most important threat against the American people”. This is the language and justification the United States uses for invading and occupying other countries of which the invasion of India by the FBI and other American officials -- news reports said there are sixteen officials from various U.S. agencies -- is the start.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 4, 2008: The United States Attorney General says [IANS report in The Hindu, December 4 ‘08, Internet] “FBI agents are working with Indian police to provide assistance and gather evidence … “I can confirm finally that the FBI is over there, that they’re working with the Indian police on gathering evidence” “. As I have said, regardless of who carried out the recent terrorist operation in Mumbai, the C.I.A. is the sponsor of all terrorism in India since 1983 and it does that through several layers of intermediaries. Letting United States officials have any role in the collection or interpretation of evidence preempts identification of the main culprit and allows the main culprit to tamper with the evidence and cover up his role as the perpetrator of the crime. Just as the LTTE carries out its operations as a puppet of C.I.A.-RAW, so do the LeT, etc. Mumbai police may not be able to torture and investigate the C.I.A. Director -- though I can provide plenty of evidence on him -- or the U. S. president -- they will be eaten by their compatriots after India’s nuclear first strike on the United States -- but it can refrain from making the criminal into a sheriff or letting the criminal touch or tamper with the evidence and it can certainly torture and investigate K. Subrahmanyam, for example. The state actor in crimes against India is the United States and the Indian armed forces ought to be arresting its Indian puppets and assisting India’s sovereign (Press Release of August 14, 2008 below) in punishing the criminal United States.
FURTHER ADDED ON DECEMBER 4, 2008: The U.S. Attorney General also “insisted that his country has the jurisdiction to prosecute the terrorist captured…” ( PTI, Washington, Dec. 4 ‘08). This by itself requires breaking diplomatic relations with the United States and declaring the United States an enemy country. He is claiming India is a United States colony.
This enemy country has also been committing terrorist acts in India since 1983 through its puppets. There is no need to investigate further.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 8, 2008: An article (by Kaplan) in the New York Times of December 8, 2008 calls for separating north and central India from the south, treating it as part of the Middle East and for America to be “at all places [of the Middle East, of which India, according to him, is a part] at once … with every bit of energy and constant attention that our national security apparatus -- and those of our allies -- can bring to bear”, including troops, colonising India with invasions and military operations as the United States has colonised the rest of the Middle East. This is the “jurisdiction” over India the Americans are claiming. Each day that goes by without India engaged in a crash program of producing ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the United States is a precious day lost in a war.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 10, 2008: Far from breaking diplomatic relations with the United States and declaring the United States an enemy country, the Indian government, as dictated by C.I.A.-RAW, sent a minister to the U.N. Security Council yesterday to facilitate the United States' exercising jurisdiction over India.
Pakistan's ISI functions as a branch of the C.I.A. as does India's RAW. It is first and foremost India's territory -- RAW headquarters on Lodhi Road in New Delhi -- that is used for terrorist acts against India and the destruction of RAW headquarters will end these terrorist acts -- the destruction of ISI will not -- though only temporarily. But the problem is much bigger than terrorism and requires the destruction of much of the rest of New Delhi also and then of the United States.
DRDO needs to provide a time table for the nuclear destruction of New Delhi -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi should be done as quickly as possible -- and the production of ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the United States.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 12, 2008: I have said (2nd Press Release dated September 1, 2008 below) that willingness to use nuclear weapons is the most important component of national security and prosperity and that this applies as much to the use of nuclear weapons within the country against agents of a foreign power as outside the country. An example of agents of a foreign country in New Delhi is from the Lok Sabha today (PTI report in The Hindu, December 12, 2008, Internet): “Referring to Nobel laureate in economics Paul Krugman, Chidambaram said this was not the year to worry too much about the fiscal gaps. “We have to stimulate the economy”.” In a letter dated August 1, 2001 to the press (see http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 ) I referred to this jew’s attempt to steal my proposal about money. Whatever this jew has said recently about deficits and stimulating the economy is taken without acknowledgment from my proposal about money. I have described below ( see my letters dated February 26, 2005, April 8, 2005 and the article “How India’s Economy can Grow 30% Per Year Or More” in addendum dated July 30, 2008) how a mediocre Indian, Amartya Sen, was given a Nobel Prize as the mediocre “Indian” substitute for me, how he was invited by Clinton to his White House Conference on “The New Economy” which my proposal about money leads to as the “Indian” substitute for me though his work had nothing to do with The New Economy, how a Nobel Prize for this mediocre Indian was arranged via Jethmalani ( see addendum dated July 4, 2005 below) to keep their ferocious crimes against India’s greatest scientist covered up and thus keep India down, how “the Americans have been suppressing my proposal about money, because it is in the economic field what nuclear weapons are in the military field, while they promote inferior Indian niggers such as Subramanian Swamy and Manmohan Singh, both of them traitors on the C.I.A.’s payroll” (addendum of August 4 to December 6, 2007, below). In the latest such act, Indian government traitors “gifted USD 4.5 million to the Harvard University to establish a Fund in the honour of Nobel laureate Amartya Sen … Indian Ambassador Ronen Sen … signed an agreement … at a ceremony at the University on Wednesday in the presence of the noted economist Amartya Sen” (PTI report in The Hindu, December 11, 2008); see also my Press Release dated September 20, 2008 below.
In creating a time table, DRDO should assume that finances will not be a constraint; in fact, the more money is spent on producing the ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the United States -- ten times, twenty times or more the amount of the entire current defence budget -- the more the economy as a whole will also benefit.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 14, 2008: The Captured Mumbai Terrorist Deserves India’s Highest Civilian & Military Awards
The ten terrorists in Mumbai killed India's enemies -- Americans (see second addendum dated December 4, 2008 above), British, Israelis and their Indian collaborators -- at great personal sacrifice and deserve India's highest civilian award, Bharat Ratna. They also showed extra-ordinary courage and heroism -- outnumbered a thousand to one -- and deserve India's highest military award for valor -- Param Vir Chakra. They are all sons of India’s soil, partitioned by India’s enemies to make Indians fight Indians (see what is said below about the role of the Intelligence Bureau which, like Nehru, remained loyal to the British after 1947, in the riots that accompanied the partition, killing and displacing millions and the same role played now by RAW and the present-day American-appointed ‘rulers‘ of India, not just in separatism and terrorism in the streets but in C.I.A.-RAW-staged Kargil war, to keep Vajpayee prime minister and other such conflicts).
The traitors in New Delhi, in and outside government, deserve death (see the rest of this press release and the press releases/ statements to the press, starting from the one dated January 5, 2004, below). See the account below of a lone Englishman arresting India’s emperor and the terrorization and subjugation inflicted on Indians by the British, killing over ten million Indians in just the ten years after 1857 and the incomparably greater terrorization and subjugation being inflicted on them now by the Americans.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 16, 2008: According to a report (Times of India, December 16, 2008, Internet) India’s worse-than-worthless military is “hard pressed to provide officers for four NSG hubs”; that is, hard pressed to provide more collaborators for India’s enemies. It has enough officers and men to arrest all employees of RAW which, as a branch of the C.I.A. against India, has a central role as the perpetrator of all terrorist acts against India. But it will take the nuclear destruction of New Delhi for India’s worse-than-worthless military to stop obeying the traitor politicians and civil servants and start obeying India’s sovereign.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 18, 2008: A headline (Times of India, December 18, 2008, Internet) says “Dawood directly involved in Mumbai attack: Russia intelligence”. Regardless of whether it is so, the Russian intelligence agency has said this at the request of the C.I.A. because whereas Indians are, for the moment, alert to Anglo-American-Israeli attempts to make Indians fight Indians, they are less likely to suspect Russian motives. But a fundamental distinction needs to be made between Russian intelligence agencies and Russia. "In 1996, Robert Trumbull Crowley, former Assistant Deputy Director of Clandestine Operations of the CIA, gave documents of his own top secret operations to his friend, historian Gregory Douglas" ( http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg103806.html ) and described in detail (a transcript is at http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=8966 ) how the C.I.A. has done “business” with Russian intelligence agencies for many decades, how the C.I.A. directly arranged the plane crash which killed Homi Bhabha but relied on Russian intelligence agencies, with which it did “business”, to assassinate Shastri who had given a go ahead for an Indian nuclear weapons program. The Russian intelligence agencies -- large parts of which were brought on the C.I.A.’s payroll -- brought down the Soviet Union. After a letter of mine in Indian Express in the early nineties which appeared under the heading “Grab This Opportunity” regarding a Russian proposal to form a Russia-China-India alliance, P. V. Narasimha Rao sent the head of India’s submarine-launched ballistic missile program to Russia to get help, where he died as Shastri did. When, in a letter to the press, I pointed out that this was the “help” the Russians had provided and expressed dismay at Indian officials entertaining the thought that any other country will give them help to build submarine-launched ballistic missiles (I wrote it showed they “have no appreciation of the real world, do not belong in the major league and should not seek a permanent seat on the Security Council… Thankfully, they are not the real leadership of India, though only India‘s enemies seem to know that“; in case it is still not clear to the stupid Indians, India‘s leadership is where the Americans have been spending hundreds of millions of dollars per year on 24-hour satellite surveillance and ’neutralisation’ of the greatest living Indian for over 31 years), the Indian government woke up, briefly, and the Russians hastily withdrew a delegation visiting India for fear of retaliation. Just as RAW sits at C.I.A.- supplied terminals to participate in crimes against India’s greatest scientist, the C.I.A. provided similar terminals to the Russian intelligence agencies after I started writing, sometimes critically, about Putin and the Russian government (see below). A report a couple days ago (The Hindu, December 16, 2008, Internet) said “Russia may lease out to India “several” nuclear-powered attack submarines, but has no such plans for China … because it “never asked for them” … “It is a question of trust, which exists between Russia and India, but is in deficit between Russia and China” …”. Well, it is just that the Chinese are more intelligent; the Russians can trust Indians to be stupid but not the Chinese. It will be the easiest thing in the world for Russian intelligence agencies to install devices in these submarines with which they can track them and, in keeping with their “business” relationship with U.S. intelligence agencies, enable the Americans to track them, too. I have said there should be an iron-clad rule against importing ANY defence equipment ( in the addendums dated March 23, 2008 and February 26, 2006 below, I have also described the perils of importing electronic equipment because of which Pakistan scrambled its fighter jets when Indian jets entered just 1-3 miles inside its air space a few days ago but is helpless against twice weekly lethal missile strikes on its territory by American drones) but considering how all Indians -- politicians, the media, etc., not just RAW -- are participating in crimes against India’s greatest scientist, this rule will only be enforced after the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. Even more fundamental in all this is Indians’ determination to be ruled by white-skinned people -- because of which they have made a firangi piece of dog-faeces their empress -- and that will require firangi-watchers and firangi-hunters, as I have described below and the extermination of the firangis, which will also be done after the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 20, 2008: The cover up of the news and views of the greatest living Indian by India’s media (these press releases are sent to hundreds of India’s media organs) is the key to all of India’s problems. If India’s patriots, such as those who recently killed India’s enemies in Mumbai, would like to be effective, they should focus their operations on media organs such as the newspaper offices on Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg in Delhi and the radio and television offices and make the punishment meted out to them specifically contingent on their cover up of the news and views of the greatest living Indian. The destruction of the newspaper and other media offices can be done by conventional means.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 22, 2008: The following are three posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
Post #1:
When recently Indian jets crossed into Pakistani air space just 1-3 miles, Pakistan scrambled its fighter jets. Why can't it intercept and shoot down the American Predator drones which make twice weekly lethal missile strikes on its territory? Just a few days ago, all parties in Pakistan's parliament had passed a resolution that Pakistan will not allow such violations of its sovereignty and will defend its territory (it was directed against American attacks on its territory; there were no Indian violations then).The recent terrorist attacks in Mumbai were instigated by the United States through intermediaries it controls in the region to provoke military tension between Pakistan and India so that it can then more extensively and flagrantly conduct attacks, including ground invasions, on Pakistan while the Indians, stupidly, keep quiet or even support them. The idea is to establish a full-fledged overtly colonial relationship with first Pakistan and then the rest of the subcontinent, very much like the direct colonial rule Britain exercised and which the United States has established over Iraq and Afghanistan through puppet governments. The Predator attacks are the beginning of this campaign.
Post # 2:
Don't make such stupid, personally insulting comments. Indians are lackeys of the Americans and cannot tolerate any accusation against them. It is all part of submission to the white man. A handful of the British, from half way around the world, had ruled India for centuries, because of stupid people like you. If you see the thread on RAW in the Indian defence section, you will see how even today India's main intelligence agency is an instrument of American rule over India. RAW has many operatives on such forums to abuse and insult anyone who points an accusing finger at the United States. Don't do that; I will crush you like a cockroach.
Post # 3:
India-Pakistan conflicts of today are no different from the Hindu-Muslim rioting that accompanied the partition in 1947 and was instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which had remained loyal to the British after 1947. The only change is that the United States has taken the place of Britain. RAW, which was split off from the Intelligence Bureau, functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India and something similar is the case with the other intelligence agencies of the region. They are used for terrorist acts in the Subcontinent by the C.I.A. for various purposes, just as the Kargil war was staged by C.I.A.-RAW, with the help of Pakistan's C.I.A.-controlled army chief (Musharraf), to help Vajpayee win the election that was pending after he had lost a vote of confidence and thus help him remain prime minister; Vajpayee used to be an informant for the British before Independence and has been a C.I.A. agent since the United States replaced Britain as the imperial power over the subcontinent and he is far from being the only politician who has been a C.I.A. agent. Nehru was a life-long British agent, as he admitted to American ambassador Galbraith and his descendents (Indira, Rajiv) have been C.I.A. agents, though they also had a relationship with the KGB because Indira became prime minister by the KGB's assassination of Shastri in Tashkent at the C.I.A.'s request. A C.I.A. specialist on India who came on Bharat-Rakshak forum a few months ago was asking that India acquiesce in the American invasion and occupation of Pakistan and later of India. He said that Pakistan's defences have been electronically neutralised to allow the ingress of Predator drones (this was before the drone attacks started) and that Pakistan's military is quite cooperative; Musharraf was not the only C.I.A. agent in the military. So it all boils down to continued white rule over India and Pakistan after 1947; it is just that the control of these countries has been transferred to covert agencies and they are nominally independent. The United States now wants to overtly occupy and rule the subcontinent, starting with Pakistan. The natives are willing to fight other non-white people like tigers, but behave like obedient dogs to the white master. RAW actively works to make overt American rule over India happen and India's so-called ruling class -- actually, puppet class -- is only too happy at the prospect because it felt orphaned when the British left India.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 25, 2008: The following is another post I made, today, on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
Post # 4
This is a quote from a post that appeared on Bharat Rakshak forum today:-
-----Start Quote --------------------------------"From my post in Khyber Durra it appears that Pakistani nukes were confiscated (and all centrifuge and reprocessing plants frozen) by USA after 9/11 as punishment for ISI payment of money and logistics to Mohd Atta (PBUH) and his 19 heroes of 9-11 fame; surrender of Pakistani Nukes was one of the demands in the non-negotiable list of demands that was given to Gen. Musharraf when "You Are With Us or Against Us" seduction poetry read by GW Bush to join GOAT or be blown to stone age. When full nuclear stock was audited by USA it appears that Pakistan managed to slip and hide between 1-4 nukes. The understanding with USA was that this GUBO in private should not be made public, else the military will be overthrown (yes military nor Govt). And the Indians should remain convinced that their nukes remain potent (sic). But Yindus being Chankian got the wind (even our own N^3 figured it out) and established that the Hawa Mahal of Pakistani nuke is well .... Hawa Mahal onleeee. ( I heard the same from a senior afsar of Bhartiya Naabhikeeya Kaman).It is believed that one of the slipped nuke has crossed into US borders and all US agencies have been running like headless chicken since then (2003) trying to locate the nuke.Of the balance 1-3 nukes that could still be in the hands of TSP Army and stateless irregulars, the form factor does not allow mounting atop missile (again Unkill has reign of the missile launch key), so they can only be delivered to India via JDAM (Jihadi Delivered Ammunition) or aircraft. Both routes have high attrition rate and it is likely that at most likely only one of the 3 may explode in an Indian city. OTOH if they have only 1 left in some hidden caves in Northern Areas (Occupied Kashmir) the chances of it making across to Indian border is well .. . . very slim."-----End Quote ------------------------------------------If the above is true -- that the United States has control of almost all of Pakistan's nuclear warheads -- that would explain why Pakistan is not shooting down American drones. But since the threat from the drones is to the entire subcontinent, not just Pakistan, India ought to be helping to shoot them down, openly, though the real task is militarily ejecting the United States from Afghanistan which should also be India's and Pakistan's joint concern and is easier than might appear (the United States will not risk losing its largest cities to India's nuclear bombs for the sake of remaining in Afghanistan, besides the overwhelming advantage India & Pakistan will have against the United States and its NATO allies in operations with conventional weapons in Afghanistan).Another point that needs to be made is the capacity of countries like India and Pakistan, with a low degree of urbanisation, to survive a full-fledged nuclear war against a country such as the United States which has a high degree of urbanisation. If both India and the United States launch 5,000 nuclear warheads at each other, targeting the 4,000 largest population centers in the other country (let us assume for simplicity that anti-missile systems are not a significant factor with such a large number of warheads, though, in fact, I have predicted India's anti-missile systems will be far more effective than the United States'), what percentage of India's population will be in its 4,000 largest population centers as compared to the percentage of the United States' population that will be in its 4,000 largest population centers? The fact of the matter is that even if 60% or 90% or 95% of India's population perishes in a full-scale nuclear war with the United States, the remaining population -- say 50 million -- will equal India's population in its classical period and India will survive, with a life-style comparable to that in its classical period. On the other hand, the United States cannot survive the destruction of its 4,000 largest population centers because of the high degree of urbanisation, technology intensive life-styles and other cultural factors. To put it another way, if India loses ALL its electricity permanently, it will survive; the United States cannot. I am predicting that the population of the United States that survives being killed immediately by the nuclear explosions will survive for a limited time period by people eating one another till no one remains alive.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 26, 2008: The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
Post # 5
There is an easy way countries like Pakistan and India can keep their nuclear strength credible: keep testing and expanding their nuclear arsenals. There is absolutely no reason why these countries should limit themselves to half a dozen tests while a country like the United States has conducted well over a thousand -- except the habit of behaving like obedient dogs to the White Master. If Pakistan would like to show the world -- and it should -- that it still has control of its nuclear arsenal and it is in good working order, it should conduct a couple of nuclear tests now. Both India and Pakistan should continue improving and expanding their nuclear arsenals and testing the new designs periodically. The firangi is the enemy which has to be destroyed; there is no need to keep yourself weak because the firangi enemy tells you to.
When I say Pakistan should conduct a couple of nuclear tests now, that does not mean that India will mount a conventional attack on it if it does not. There is no question of India attacking Pakistan. Pakistan needs to show independence from the United States and conducting a couple of nuclear tests in, say, a month from now will be a good way to do it. If it is true that the United States has taken control of its centrifuges, etc., it should start working on building new ones.Beyond that, of course, is the joint responsibility of India and Pakistan to eject the United States from Afghanistan and that is what they should focus on and that also requires further nuclear tests.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 28, 2008: DRDO should determine as quickly as possible an island where thermonuclear weapons can be tested to their full yields and start designing, building and testing thermonuclear weapons, since the head of the Department of Atomic Energy has been bought by the Americans. DRDO should set up whatever facilities are needed to design and produce nuclear weapons independently of the Department of Atomic Energy. The first test should be conducted as quickly as possible, taking a nuclear weapon, of whatever type, from the existing stockpile if necessary, in a matter of weeks and no more than a couple of months. An objective of this test will be to blow the traitor deal, known as the nuclear deal, to bits in defence of India. This test can be conducted on an island or in Pokhran, depending on the type and yield of the nuclear weapon, or in New Delhi itself. The best test would be a nuclear weapon mounted on top of a missile in flight and exploded over the island as it would be in use in war, but an underground test will also be fine. Conducting such an above ground test will itself constitute renouncing the Partial Test Ban Treaty; there is no need to make any reference to the traitors of the Ministry of External Affairs who will be blown to bits anyway, along with many other traitors, if the test is conducted in New Delhi itself.
If the media continue the cover up of the news and views of the greatest living Indian, it will be necessary to conduct the first test in New Delhi itself.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 30, 2008: In designing nuclear weapons for use against the United States, radioactive materials should be identified that can be dispersed over the territory of the United States, either via separate radiological weapons (“dirty bombs”) or as part of the regular thermonuclear weapons, that will so contaminate the territory of the United States with radioactivity that nothing will grow there for at least several years that can be consumed without getting a lethal dose of radiation. This will force the Americans who survive the nuclear bomb explosions on the four thousand largest population centers to eat one another till no one remains alive.
The ‘salting’ of the territory of the United States with such radioactivity can be done in a separate operation -- such as by unmanned aerial vehicles -- after its four thousand largest population centers have been destroyed by regular thermonuclear weapons. This requires that India be the dominant power after the initial exchange of, say, five thousand nuclear weapons between India and the United States. India has the leadership required for this but the cover up of the news and views of the leadership has to be lifted. Lifting this cover up is the first stage of India’s war for survival. As this cover up is lifted, many politicians, media people and, above all, RAW bosses such as the kingpin of C.I.A.-RAW operations in India for decades, K. Subrahmanyam, will try to flee to the United States and those who succeed will share the fate of Americans. Once the cover up of the news about the greatest living Indian is lifted, the genocidal intent and behaviour of the United States toward India will be clear. He has been writing about it for three decades.
The grip of the United States on India through C.I.A.-RAW can be broken only temporarily by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. Exterminating the population of the United States is essential for India to survive.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 31, 2008: If the armed forces would like to make themselves useful to India rather than to India’s enemies, they should force the lifting of the media cover up of the news and views of the greatest living Indian and India’s real leadership at the points of bayonets. If the armed forces fail to do so within four days, DRDO should proceed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
ADDED ON JANUARY 1, 2009: It is highly unlikely that India’s armed forces will act as above. DRDO should proceed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi without waiting.
The following are posts on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
My post:
In letters to the press several years ago, I showed how radiological weapons (weapons that spread radioactive material over large areas, instead of producing heat and blast) can give even the smallest country military power comparable to that of a superpower. Just half a dozen two-inch mortars, operated by the country's special forces, can cover a city the size of London with radioactive material in a matter of minutes forcing the city's evacuation. Pakistan could give an ultimatum demanding the immediate stoppage of the Predator attacks on its territory and withdrawal of all NATO forces from Afghanistan in, say, three weeks under pain of such forced evacuation of London. To be effective, the operation should be carried out over London before the ultimatum and the ultimatum should demand withdrawal from Afghanistan on pain of similar forced evacuations of other Western cities of comparable size.After World War II, the United States had considered having its nuclear arsenal consist almost entirely of radiological weapons. It decided in favour of fission and fusion bombs but that does not mean that countries that cannot easily produce fission and fusion bombs should not go for radiological weapons. They are much more usable and more effective in many ways.
Post by Niazi9:
Reapers are expensive puppies. We knock couple of them down or have our proxies do so and the US will perk up. Problem is that we've already gamed the scenario and realized it would be net loss for us given that the targets are against us as well. It boils my blood hearing any talk about them being our friends. Just tell that to hundreds of our brave soldiers who have died at the hands of these tribal asswipes. At the end of the day, these people are against the Pakistani nation state and I and one imagines our forces aren't losing sleep over their losses.
My post:
As I have said at the very start of this thread, the drone attacks are the beginning of a campaign to occupy and dismember Pakistan and then the rest of the subcontinent. The United States creates whatever excuses it finds handy for such purposes. What is at stake is the very survival, not just of Pakistan but of the other countries of the subcontinent as well.
My post:
Both India's and Pakistan's armies are parts of the British Indian army. All units, regiments, etc. of India's army have retained the identities they had during British colonial rule and regularly celebrate the anniversaries of their founding by the British, some of them more than 250 years ago. I believe the same is the case with Pakistan's army. MILLIONS of Indians, both Hindu and Muslim, fought under the British in both World War I and World War II and not a single one of them fought the British on behalf of their mother land, except for the prisoners of war taken by the Japanese from the Indian army which were formed into the Azad Hind Fauj by Subhash Chandra Bose. This history of loyalty to whites -- the only change is that the Americans have replaced the British -- has some thing to do with the fact that Pakistan's armed forces do not even try to shoot down American drones. Close relatives -- sons, etc. -- of practically all senior officers of both India's and Pakistan's armed forces live and work in the United States and I have found, in the case of Indians, that their loyalties are with the White Master; I believe the same is the case with officers of Pakistan's armed forces. An example of this seems to be the gentleman named Niazi who posted above. I have only come across this name once -- Lt. General Niazi who commanded Pakistan's forces in East Pakistan and surrendered to India's Lt. Gen. Jagjit Singh Arora in 1971. Lt. Gen. Niazi was in the British Indian army and won a Military Cross for valor fighting for the British. On looking at the other posts of Mr. Niazi, it seems he is indeed a nephew of Lt. Gen. Niazi and himself lives in the United States. His post above shows a degree of identification with the American drone attackers. He refers to the drones being "expensive" and says the Americans will "perk up" if you shoot them down. His 'blood boils' not at those who are attacking Pakistani territory but at the Pakistani victims of the drone attacks. I don't mean to make an ad hominem argument with respect to Mr. Niazi but only referred to him as an example of the reason why Pakistan remains undefended against the Americans -- the reason being that both India's and Pakistan's armies are more loyal to their white colonial masters -- past and future -- than to their own people, though this problem of loyalty to white foreigners exists in the civilian population as well. There are millions of Indians living in the United States, from civilian and military families in India and most of them are just as loyal to the Americans as Mr. Niazi is and hate any patriotism for India as Mr. Niazi does for Pakistan and the same is true of their family members in India. I have no reason to believe things are very different for Pakistanis. India similarly remains undefended against the United States.
Contrast the behavior of Indians and Pakistanis with that of Iraqis; the Iraqi citizens' militias, during the second invasion of Iraq in 2003, charged American tanks in cars and SUVs and were cut down by the TENS OF THOUSANDS without the Americans suffering a single casualty. No amount of advanced weaponry will be of use if there is no desire to defend your country against whites. The Americans are depending upon this characteristic of Indians and Pakistanis in their plans to occupy and re-colonise the subcontinent. I have said in post # 1 above that the recent terror attacks in Mumbai were meant to facilitate these plans. The U.S. government does not keep its sponsorship of terrorism in the subcontinent a secret. Mitchell Shivers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, gave the following testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 25 June 2008: ".... elements of extremism and terrorism are at work within Pakistan sponsored by the usa and India." ( http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2008/11/17/pakistan-the-next-us-target ). The same is the case with terrorism in India. The United States' sponsorship of terrorism is the least of what it does. I have written about its suppression of India's research and development and its spending hundreds of millions of dollars per year on 24-hour satellite surveillance and crimes against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian for over 31 years.
In Pakistan there are movements -- Jihadi movements, Madarasa-educated youngsters, etc. -- which do motivate many Pakistanis to fight white aggressors. So there is hope for Pakistan. In India, however, even such movements are lacking.
Perhaps I am being unfair to senior Pakistani military officers. Just before the second Gulf War, there was a report of an Egyptian dignitary visiting Pakistan saying that Pakistan and Egypt will act together to save the Islamic Ummah, apparently the plan being for Egyptian planes to deliver Pakistani nuclear weapons to European capitals, if necessary. But the Americans came to know of the plan and it had to be aborted. It is more likely that I am being too generous to Pakistani military officers, considering they would not even defend Pakistan's own territory against the United States. Exactly the same is the case with Indians; Indians both in and outside government eagerly participate in the United States' crimes against India and their blood boils at any one who disturbs this master-slave arrangement. India's only hope is in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
ADDED ON JANUARY 3, 2009: The United States will be taken care of by the ten thousand nuclear warheads and their means of delivery India will have. All that the armed forces can do is take care of the traitor politicians and civil servants or just the media cover up referred to above with their bayonets and they can still do it, if they move fast, before DRDO does it with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
“In India's army, the officers and men identify with and take pride in their regiments and regimental history and their regimental history invariably goes back to the British officers who founded or commanded the regiment and their exploits. This way they feel they are one with the British and the power and military successes of the British victors is also theirs and they do not have to feel they are like the inferior native rulers' armies the British so thoroughly routed. This feeling of being in the same army with the British is central to their morale and their ability to fight well and they cling to it because otherwise they will be like all the other inferior Indians who lost and were routed and will have no morale to speak of.The Indian Civil Service (ICS), with which the British ruled India, was renamed Indian Administrative Service (IAS) after India's so-called 'Independence' and the IAS has often been called the "steel frame" which holds India together, because the IAS also have their loyalties rooted in their history as the British rulers of India with a few Indians mixed in. The present day members of the IAS still see themselves as agents of whites (with the Americans having replaced the British) ruling India. Their connection to present day white countries is live and continuing and they continue to receive instructions/orders, as well as money, from their white masters through RAW whereas in the army, the connection with the British is only through old faded photographs and trophies and tales of battles and campaigns.The armed forces can transfer their pride and loyalties to indigenous India from British colonial India if the indigenous India is seen as headed toward military supremacy -- that is, nuclear supremacy -- over the strongest white country and this can become the anchor of their morale. Since their connection to the British is through old faded photographs and trophies, they are not so bound to the current imperial power, the United States, as the civil servants are.Insofar as Pakistan's army has maintained the same regimental system, the above explains why they have difficulty shooting down American drones; it can be termed broadly a problem of morale. Military entities without a British history or present or recent American connections should have no problems of morale, just equipment. (Note that Mr. Niazi above referred to having "our proxies" shoot them down; why should he even think of having proxies defend the country rather than the armed forces themselves?).”
ADDED ON JANUARY 5, 2009: The following are three posts I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
My post
The question is -- when it comes to the white man, are Pakistanis any less slavish than Indians are?According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, the Americans are now providing live video feeds from the drones to Pakistani army officers and making them participants in the drone attacks. The Americans got the idea from what I wrote above, that a feeling of being in the same army as the British is central to the morale of Indian army officers and men and their ability to fight well, that both Indian and Pakistani armies are more loyal to their white colonial masters -- past and future -- than to their own people, that the Indians are all too happy at the prospect of the occupation and recolonisation of the subcontinent by the Americans because they had felt orphaned when the British left India.The slavish behaviour and loyalty toward the white man exists because the native armies were thoroughly routed by the British. They were routed because of the technological advantage the British had. The use of drones by the Americans -- with operators sitting in Nevada pushing the buttons to launch missiles on Pakistan -- shows that the technological gap has only widened, not narrowed, in the hundreds of years that have passed since the British routed the natives. And the natives make no serious attempt to close the gap. Whatever technology they have is taken from the white master and they are quite happy to continue this way.The latest example of this is India signing a multibillion dollar deal with Boeing for eight maritime reconnaissance aircraft instead of pumping the money into indigenous research and development.
My post
India gets about 70% of its defence equipment from Russia. In the early 1990s, Yevgeny Primakov, who used to be Foreign Minister and, before that, KGB chief, suggested a Russia, China, India alliance. I applauded that in a letter to the press which the Indian Express published under the heading "Grab This Opportunity". Upon that, the then Indian prime minister sent the head of India's submarine-launched ballistic missile program to Russia to get help, where he died. When I pointed out in a letter to the press that this was the "help" the Russians had provided, the Indian government briefly woke up, but only briefly. The Indian press recently reported that Russia had offered several nuclear-powered attack submarines to India but not to China because there is a lot of "trust" between Russia and India but not between Russia and China. I pointed out that it will be the easiest thing in the world for the Russians to install devices in them that will enable them to track them and -- in keeping with the "business" relationship between Russian and American intelligence agencies going back many decades, which a former senior C.I.A. official has described, under which the KGB assassinated visiting Indian prime minister Shastri, during his Tashkent meeting with Pakistan's Ayub, at the C.I.A.'s request because he had given a go ahead to India's nuclear weapons program -- enable the Americans to track them, too. Indians continue their dependence on the Russians as Pakistan does on America and a C.I.A. specialist on the subcontinent a few months ago said that Pakistan's defences have been electronically neutralised to allow the ingress of Predator drones (this was before the drone attacks started), that its nuclear weapons are totally under U.S. control and that Pakistan's military is quite cooperative in all this. But soon both India and Pakistan may be American colonies. A Russian intelligence agent has started a thread to make Pakistanis start thinking of starting to buy defence equipment from Russia because the Indians may stop buying from them after what I wrote about the nuclear submarines. But there is no solution except indigenous research and development.
My post
Following my post # 44 above, a news report says Pakistan's army chief, Gen. Kayani, has demanded that U.S. drone attacks on Pakistan cease immediately as they are counterproductive in the war against extremism and terrorism. But in post #39 above I poined out that the U.S. government itself acknowledges that it is sponsoring extremism and terrorism in Pakistan through India's RAW:-"Mitchell Shivers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, gave the following testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 25 June 2008: ".... elements of extremism and terrorism are at work within Pakistan sponsored by the usa and India."( http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2008/11/17/pakistan-the-next-us-target )."Following this post, the U.S. vice-president-elect, who was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to which the above testimony was made, came to Pakistan with $15 billion in aid. And India's government i) sent letters to governments worldwide not to give financial assistance to Pakistan and ii) gave a dossier of evidence to Pakistan's ambassador (also to U.S., UK, and China's ambassadors) about the Mumbai terror attacks and asked Pakistan to investigate further (earlier it was asking Pakistan not to investigate but to ACT against the guilty individuals and organisations the U.S. and India had named). As I have been saying for a long time, the guilty parties are the C.I.A. and India's RAW and other intermediaries, in India, Pakistan and other countries, that the C.I.A. uses. The C.I.A. is the epicenter of worldwide terrorism and India's RAW is its most important instrument for terrorist acts (as well as a lot of other crimes) against India. But NO ONE is talking about C.I.A.-RAW being the perpetrators of the Mumbai terror attacks or hundreds of other such acts against India -- not India's government, not India's Opposition parties, not Pakistan's government, not any country's media. Now Gen. Kayani is still talking of the drone attacks being “counterproductive" in the "war against extremism and terrorism" and India's defence minister met India's service chiefs on Monday, according to press reports and asked for "presentations" on the security situation. They all know the United States' crimes against India and Pakistan and they are all participating in them. The Indian participants in these crimes will be taken care of by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi; the United States will be taken care of by the ten thousand nuclear warheads and their means of delivery to the continental United States that will follow.
　
ADDED ON JANUARY 6, 2009: The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:
India is asking Pakistan to accept that the captured Mumbai terrorist is a Pakistani national. Many terrorists are from what India calls Pakistan-Occupid Kashmir (P.O.K.) and Pakistan calls Azad Kashmir. Since P.O.K., according to India, is an integral part of India, like the rest of Kashmir, anyone born and raised in P.O.K., according to Indian law, is from India. That means that any terrorist born and raised in P.O.K., from the point of view of Indian law, is an Indian citizen.
Also, any terrorist training camps that may exist in P.O.K. are on Indian soil, according to Indian law. If they are being used to launch terrorist attacks on India, those attacks are being launched from Indian soil, from the point of view of Indian law.
But I have said all the Mumbai terrorists are sons of India, partitioned by India’s enemies to make Indians fight Indians, that an attack by the firangis on Pakistan is an attack on India and occupation of Afghanistan by the firangis is occupation of India.
India’s partition was accepted by Nehru who was a life-long British agent as he admitted to U.S. ambassador Galbraith and he became India’s first prime minister and, thus, India’s partition had no legal validity as India’s current traitor government has no legal standing. British rule over India, both before and after 1857, was by an occupying power. Any Indians who fought with the British against India’s emperor in 1857 were insurgents.
ADDED ON JANUARY 7, 2009: Pakistan does not shoot down American drones because Pakistan is a creation of the firangis, an insurgency within India to serve the firangis’ purposes. Whereas the firangi-controlled insurgency that is Pakistan is overt, RAW is an instrument of the firangis within India that functions covertly. Both these instruments of the firangis engage in terrorism and warfare against India but RAW, through which the firangis control and operate India’s traitor-puppet government as well as media, does a lot more -- such as suppressing and sabotaging India’s defence research and development and participating in the firangis’ crimes against the greatest living Indian -- and is, by far, the more powerful and effective instrument in the firangis’ hands. The firangis and RAW try to keep India occupied with fighting Pakistan and divert attention from the real enemy -- the firangis -- and any mention of RAW as the firangis’ instrument against India is suppressed. Taking care of RAW and the traitor-puppet government by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then of the United States by means of ten thousand nuclear warheads will take care of India’s problems.
ADDED ON JANUARY 8, 2009: The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
“I have cited testimony by a U.S. official before a committee of the U.S. Congress (the Senate Foreign Relations Committee) in which he acknowledged United States' sponsorship of extremist and terrorist groups in Pakistan :"Mitchell Shivers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, gave the following testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 25 June 2008: ".... elements of extremism and terrorism are at work within Pakistan sponsored by the usa and India." (http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/...next-us-target )."The testimony in post # 1 of this thread before the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security about the FBI's 'investigation' of the Mumbai attacks, pretending the U.S. does not know of its sponsorship of those and hundreds of other attacks, was staged to try to cover up and divert attention from that acknowledgment before the other U.S. Senate committee of U.S. sponsorship of extremism and terrorism in Pakistan. The U.S. vice-president-elect, Biden, was the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee before which the above testimony, containing the acknowledgment, was given. His "fact-finding" trip to the subcontinent is similarly meant to try to get 'deniability' as to his participation in these crimes . "Fact-finding" my foot! All these criminal Americans know exactly what they have been doing in the subcontinent.As I have said in another thread (titled "Why Can't Pakistan Shoot Down U.S. Drones?") on this board, the mumbai attacks were carried out by the C.I.A., through intermediaries such as RAW and similar entities in Pakistan, of course, to provoke military tension/conflict between India and Pakistan so that the U.S. will have an opportunity to greatly expand its attacks on Pakistan, at present mostly limited to drone attacks, which are the start of a U.S. campaign to occupy and recolonise the subcontinent.Not only has the United States no right to investigate a crime committed in India and should have no access to any evidence, etc., letting it take the position it is taking is making the criminal into a sheriff.Failing to see what the Americans are up to and treating the criminal as a sheriff on the part of Indians (of course, RAW and many other Indians know about and participate in the Americans' crimes) is due to American propaganda which Indian media carry and the suppression of the news of the crimes of the Americans and their Indian lackeys against the greatest living Indian which are documented and clear as day light. Focusing on these crimes will expose all the other crimes of the United States. But the United States controls the media through RAW.”
When Biden comes to India, he should be arrested by Mumbai police for participating in crimes of terrorism against India.
ADDED JANUARY 11, 2009: I have been waiting for news of Biden being arrested in India. But he has apparently decided to avoid arrest by skipping India. India must demand his extradition to face trial in India for participating in crimes of terrorism against India. India must also demand extradition of Mitchell Shivers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, who, without a question, is a participant in these crimes, as well as the C.I.A. Director.
FURTHER ADDED ON JANUARY 11, 2009: The Americans had invaded Panama and brought its head of state, Manuel Noriega, to the United States in chains and he remains in jail in the U.S. for engaging in drug trade. Two decades ago, in a telephone conversation with Mrs. Imelda Marcos, whose husband, the Philippine president, was facing trial in the U.S., I said something close to the following "These (the Americans) are the worst criminals on the face of the Earth. They are Europeans who have usurped the land of other people and committed genocide on them. Each time we buy any thing (in the U.S.), we pay taxes that are being used to commit crimes all over the world by the C.I.A. We have the right to arrest President Reagan and the entire American government and try them under Indian law. It is not the law, the problem is enforcement -- who has got the guns. There is an American saying 'If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns'. These (the Americans) are the biggest outlaws in the world and they have got the guns -- nuclear weapons. And they would like to keep it that way.”That is also why nuclear supremacy over the United States, which I have been advocating, is essential for India.
The outlaw nature of the United States is most clearly seen in its crimes against the greatest living Indian which are also genocidal crimes against India. Lifting the cover up of these crimes is necessary to see the true nature of the United States. Just as Indians are keeping quiet about the acknowledgment before the U.S. Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee of the United States’ sponsorship of extremist and terrorist groups in Pakistan, they have been keeping quiet about the crimes against the greatest living Indian and doing all they can to cover them up. This cover up must be lifted to see the true nature of the United States and what India needs to do to survive. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi is necessary to lift this cover up.
ADDED ON JANUARY 13, 2009: India’s Home Minister says “all diplomatic, business, transport and tourist links between the two countries would be cut off if Islamabad fails to act against terror groups responsible for the 26/11 terror strikes” (Times of India, January 13, 2009, Internet). But the sponsor of those strikes and hundreds of other such acts and vastly more serious genocidal crimes against India is the United States. All diplomatic, business, transport and tourist links between India and the United States should be cut off before the United States is destroyed with India’s nuclear weapons. Doing so will require the nuclear destruction of New Delhi first.
ADDED ON JANUARY 15, 2009: Biden may have skipped India but the FBI and the C.I.A. are expanding and consolidating their presence and the U.S. ambassador says they will continue into the indefinite future to detect and thwart any future terrorist threats, thus bringing India into a direct U.S. colonial grip as tight as the British had. Taking a witness in the Mumbai case to the U.S. for interrogation was to establish U.S. colonial jurisdiction over India. The United States has bought India’s army chief who is now rejecting various indigenously developed weapon systems, wants Indian troops to go to Afghanistan to support the Americans and calls terrorism the biggest and only threat to India. He will die in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi which should proceed without delay.
ADDED ON JANUARY 23, 2009: Like Biden, Obama is NOT welcome to India, despite India’s traitor-puppet prime minister sending him a letter inviting him. Obama is the president of an enemy country.
India’s media, controlled by C.I.A.-RAW, have been full of stories about Obama, treating him like the ruler of India and not a single story about the greatest living Indian and America’s crimes against him and against India. The media mould and shape the people’s minds and behaviour and they have been working to bring Indians deeper and deeper into slavery. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will bring the regime change needed to change this and enable India to destroy the enemy country. This is urgently needed.
The following are posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:-

January 11, 2009: For country A to deter country B with its nuclear weapons, country A has to be able to deliver its nuclear weapons to country B. Everyone knows Pakistan can deliver its nuclear weapons to India. But the country that is currently carrying out twice weekly attacks on Pakistan's territory is the United States. How can Pakistan deter the United States? Even without Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs), it is not difficult to think of ways Pakistan could deliver half a dozen nuclear weapons to the United States' coastal cities such as New York and Washington. This thread is meant to explore ways in which Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States, the knowledge of which would deter the United States.

January 14, 2009: Any one who has an 'understanding' with a foreign power for attacks on his own country's territory is a slave. As I have said in another thread, both India and Pakistan are such slaves of the white man.

I have said that the drone attacks are the start of a campaign by the United States to occupy and recolonise the subcontinent. Therefore India has to worry about the drone attacks as much as Pakistan and India has as much responsibility to stop them as does Pakistan.

Since the attacker is a nuclear power, stopping the drone attacks has to include the possible use of nuclear weapons. "Why do we need to deliver nuclear weapons to the US?" Because the United States is attacking your territory and it is a nuclear power. Since the drone attacks are as much a threat to India as they are to Pakistan, India will have to stop them if Pakistan will not.

Most Pakistanis would understand this. RAW has some operatives on this forum with Pakistani identities. Since RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India (and Pakistan), it tries to stop any discussion of how these countries could defend themselves against the United States. I don't know if you are one of those but post # 2 in this thread is by a RAW operative who registered after I started this thread and then posted something to try to stop any discussion of how Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States the knowledge of which will deter the United States from attacking Pakistan. Only someone who thinks that the white master has the right to do any thing he wants to his Indian and Pakistani slaves will object to such a discussion.

January 15, 2009: RAW is not the only intelligence agency posting on such boards. So does the C.I.A. This S-2 person is from the C.I.A. Both RAW and the C.I.A. try to prevent any discussion of how countries like India and Pakistan can defend themselves against the United States.
I have said that the prospect of Pakistan delivering half a dozen nuclear weapons to its coastal cities such as New York and Washington will stop the U.S. and its drone attacks cold. It does not matter if the United States' air force is a hundred times more capable than Pakistan's or its army has equipment poor Asians can't dream of; that is the beauty of nuclear weapons; they are a great EQUALISER.

So let us consider how Pakistan could deliver nuclear weapons to U.S. coastal cities. One way it can do so is by cruise missiles mounted on naval vessels -- which could be submarines or surface vessels. Pakistan has nuclear capable cruise missiles which can be mounted on surface ships. The ship(s) will have to get within range of the target city. If the range of its nuclear capable cruise missiles is 500 miles, the ship will have to get within 500 miles of the target city. Note that this does not have to be a ship belonging to the navy. There is no reason why cruise missiles cannot be installed on merchant ships and properly camouflaged and launched when the ship gets within range of the target.

Pakistan also has ballistic missiles of various ranges that are nuclear capable. Such missiles CAN be launched from surface ships, even merchant ships, from specially designed launching platforms and camouflaged/hidden till they get within range of the target.

What are some of the other possibilities? Now is the time to get creative.

January 15, 2009: Why is this C.I.A. person (S-2) being allowed to post here?….I know Pakistan is a firangi-controlled insurgency within India, created by the firangis to serve their purposes. The United States is the firangi nation in control of Pakistan now. We will rub the United States out of existence. But we would not like Pakistan to be hurt.

ADDED ON JANUARY 24, 2009: RAW arranged for the emergency heart problems of Manmohan Singh, to use as grounds for replacing him as prime minister, if necessary, hoping this will forestall the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. After the reference to nuclear weapons as a great equaliser in the addendum above, it instructed Kakodkar to make a statement today against “dependence” on other countries in the matter of technology, placed a story in the media about a lot of high grade uranium in Meghalaya remaining untapped (due to political agitation, arranged by RAW, as I have said below) while India’s nuclear power plants run at half capacity and an editorial in Deccan Chronicle calling for India to carry out a nuclear test, also to forestall the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. All these moves will be reversed in a half second if there is no threat of the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. On a typical day, in the Internet edition of The Hindu, the top ten or so stories were about Obama, then one story about India without a reference to Obama or the United States, then another ten or so stories about obama or the United States and this has been typical of the Indian press. RAW has cut down on the number of stories about Obama. But unless the top ten or so stories on a typical day in each media organ are about the greatest living Indian, NOTHING has changed. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi should proceed.
ADDED ON JANUARY 25, 2009: RAW cannot be given a lot of time to lift the media cover up above, for obvious reasons. Its time is up. The government and the media are puppets of RAW. They have chosen not to break out of RAW’s control. Their time is also up, as of everyone else in New Delhi. I have already said that anyone who wants to flee New Delhi/Delhi is free to do so; this can be done in a matter of hours. The media have not informed the public at large, so those who know about the impending doom and yet have kept the public in the dark -- this includes all the top people in the government, the media and many others -- are responsible for the deaths that will result. I have said that the objective of the nuclear destruction of New Delhi -- destroying firangi rule over India -- will be achieved even if everyone in New Delhi/Delhi flees and no one is killed. Since the people in the government and the media have chosen to die and take the population of New Delhi/Delhi with them, that is their choice. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will proceed without further delay.
Questions about what to do after the nuclear destruction of New Delhi should be sent to me at satchandra24@hotmail.com . In the press releases below I have said that after the nuclear destruction of New Delhi, India’s government will be in Hyderabad and various governmental and affiliated entities will be funded in accordance with my proposal about money. Till the new government of India in Hyderabad begins functioning, all state governments and other entities -- governmental and non-governmental -- outside New Delhi/Delhi should continue to function normally so far as possible. Further instructions will be provided via these press releases as appropriate.
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 8, 2009: Large poster-type advertisements by the C.I.A. to recruit Indians have appeared repeatedly in the middle of the Times of India home page within the past few days. This should be seen in conjunction with what I wrote above about the FBI and the C.I.A. expanding and consolidating their presence in India and bringing India into a U.S. colonial grip as tight as the British had. Bringing India under their overt supervision, the Indian government submitted a dossier on the Mumbai attacks to the C.I.A.; first India’s Home Minister himself was going to the U.S. to thus ‘report’ to them but, after a comment of mine, sent a team of Home Ministry officials instead. I have said that the media cover up above, which is just an aspect of the U.S. colonial grip over India, will not be lifted without the nuclear destruction of New Delhi which will destroy the colonial rule. It is time to do so.
The failure, on January 20, 2009, of a Brahmos missile to hit its target was followed by a RAW-arranged media blizzard of reports of the failure of India’s missile programs and of DRDO. I knew that that failure, as of the recent ISRO-made European satellite, was due to sabotage -- which I have repeatedly referred to below -- by C.I.A.-RAW. There has been no media blizzard of reports on the discovery that the United States had switched off, during the missile’s flight, the signal to the test zone from the Global Positioning System (GPS) which the missile used for guidance, resulting in the failure. This failure of the missile was pre-arranged by C.I.A.-RAW with India’s army chief, who was present during the test, to ‘neutralise’ what I wrote above on January 15, 2009 about his having been bought by the United States and his rejecting various indigenously developed weapon systems, etc. After this “General Kapoor went on to let the media know that the army might call off the Brahmos deal. The proposal for purchase of 240 of the missiles for two regiments of the army, he indicated, was to be shelved until the missile’s capability was proven” ( http://www.truthout.org/020609B ). I am aghast that India should use ANY electronic support from the U.S. -- or Russia and other countries -- particularly in the defence field, much less for a signal to guide its missiles -- even after what I have written below about “National Security Crisis Due To Microwaves From Satellites” (February 26 ‘06), “Why Are American Companies Providing India’s Satellite Navigation System -- Gagan” (October 24 ‘08) and the addendum of March 23 ‘08; I have been writing to the press with such warnings since 1996-97; in December 1982 I warned about such sabotage in a letter to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. After what I wrote above on December 18 ‘08 about a similar danger from Russia and referred to the plans for Russia to lease out to India several nuclear powered attack submarines, Russia cancelled those plans. But, as I have said, similar dangers exist in importing nuclear power plants and numerous other kinds of civilian and military equipment. Sabotaging and suppressing India’s research and development by C.I.A.-RAW is also an aspect of the colonial grip over India which will only be broken with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 10, 2009: Whatever I have said above about the dangers of importing equipment or using support of any kind from the United States applies to all white countries, not just the United States which is just the most powerful and therefore the most aggressive of the white countries. It is Biology which makes white countries India’s enemies and necessitates that India enslave/ exterminate the white race or be exterminated. This objective has to be clearly kept in front and used to determine all actions and decisions for India to overcome the military disadvantage it is in right now and survive. To see how the actions and policies of the United States are determined by race, all that is needed is to lift the cover up of what the United States has been doing to India’s greatest scientist and greatest living Indian for over three decades. Killing a few million Indians in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi to lift this cover up and enable India to do what is needed is a small price to pay for the survival of the nation as a whole.
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 12-15, 2009: Although any time is a good time to destroy New Delhi, even nights and weekends, now that Parliament is in session it is a particularly good time. I would like to see as many of the traitors killed as possible, though I suspect a lot, if not most, will stay away from the area. The Parliament building is close enough to North Block and South Block so that the blast targeted at North and South Blocks should destroy all of them as well as other nearby complexes. With yields of about twenty kilotons each, the delivery of the nuclear bombs need not be very accurate.
The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Much of the United States' buying of people such as India's army chief is done through K. Subrahmanyam who has been the king pin of C.I.A. operations in India for decades. He has been responsible for setting up the LTTE and other insugencies in India and neighbouring countries and he proudly refers to having been responsible for setting up the insurgency in East Pakistan which led to the creation of Bangladesh. He used to be chairman of India's Joint Intelligence Committee and later head of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses. I have said that almost all terrorist acts in India since 1983 have been carried out by the C.I.A. through intermediaries in the region, including India's RAW, Pakistan's ISI and various non-governmental entities such as LeT, the Dawood group, etc. RAW is just as much involved in setting up and operating the insurgencies in India including those in Punjab, Kashmir and the Northeast as in neighbouring countries. But, like India's army chief, they are all puppets and agents of the C.I.A. which is ultimately responsible for all the insurgencies and terrorism in the subcontinent and most terrorism around the globe.It is not just India's army chief who has been bought by the United States. I have said that the Kargil war was staged by the C.I.A. with the help of RAW and Pakistan's then army chief (Musharraf) to help Vajpayee -- who, like Nehru was of British intelligence agencies, has been a life long agent of British and American intelligence agencies -- win the election that was pending after he had lost a vote of confidence as prime minister. I have said that the firangis still rule the subcontinent after 1947; it is just that the control was transferred to covert agencies after the so-called 'Independence'.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The nuclear destruction of New Delhi is the first stage of India’s new War of Independence.
The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On an Indian military discussion board, some one made a post referring to an article in today's New York Times and saying:"This is one guy I have deep respect for. He has a lot of love and admration for India and things Indian. Form your opinion from this Op-Ed in NYT."This article, for whose author this Indian has a lot of love and admiration, is by someone who has been a participant in the WORST crimes against India in India's history by the firangis and in covering up those crimes, which are continuing, for over three decades. When those crimes were referred to recently [in the addendum dated February 10, 2009 above], he rushed to India to write another one of these articles. The Indians' love and admiration for their British conquerors has been replaced by their love and admiration for their American enemies.For some perspective, see the first post in the following thread:RAW: India's External Intelligence AgencyAbout Indians' love and admiration for the white man generally, I wrote the following a few months ago:-Source of Manmohan Singh’s ‘Deep Love’ For BushIndian politicians have condemned Manmohan Singh’s telling Bush that the people of India “deeply love” him. They should see the source of Indians’ love for the white man as I explained below many months ago:-“There is a basic difference between the treason of Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee and that of Manmohan Singh. The holocaust after 1857 in which the British killed ten million Indians in the first decade to terrorize and subdue them was in large part committed with the help of Sikhs. This terrorization and subduing continued right up to the end of direct British rule, exemplified by the Sikh soldier, riding in a jeep with the British viceroy, cutting down with his submachine gun any Indian, man woman or child, that came in view on either side of the road. The role of the Sikhs, who were originally founded to save India from foreign invaders -- the invaders were then Muslims -- reversed from 1857 on and they became a principal instrument of the British terrorization and subjugation of India. The Sikhs know how successful this terrorization and subjugation was -- it is this terrorization and subjugation because of which Indians today dare not even mention nuclear supremacy for India much less demand it -- and their role in it determines their attitude toward whites and toward Indians. This is why Manmohan Singh considers himself answerable to no one except Bush and the white man as he imposes the terrorization and subjugation of the nuclear deal on India, makes no attempt to hide his loyalty to the white man and shows open contempt for Indians…. Like Manmohan Singh and others praising British rule over India (he did that when receiving an honorary doctorate from Cambridge University; he was prime minister of India at the time), there are many Indians who praise American rule over India. Like the many Indians loyal to Queen Victoria, there are many Indians loyal to the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India [she was treated as the empress of India even before she held any party or government post and all visiting heads of state were required to call on her at her residence; this was so even during BJP governments at the Center]. … In war, officers are under orders to execute on the spot any soldiers who are too terrorized to fight or obey orders to advance on enemy positions. … The terrorization and subjugation Indians have undergone at the hands of the British is responsible for Indians refusing to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy over the United States. It is necessary to execute -- machine gun and bulldoze into trenches -- at least a few thousand such Indians, who are in key positions -- such as RAW employees, politicians and media people -- to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy (they may be terrorized or bought up or both though being bought up is greatly facilitated by being terrorized; the terror, when long standing, is usually repressed meaning unconscious and being subjugated often involves both terror and carrot but terror is the foundation of the treason of RAW employees and people such as Vajpayee and Mani Shankar Aiyar though all they may feel is love and loyalty for the white man; terror facilitates such love [emphasis added]; a former head of RAW, Vikram Sood, in a column in Hindustan Times, repeatedly quoted the white/Christian head of the missionary school he attended as the fount of all wisdom on various issues and referred to Indians as worshippers of snakes and monkeys on a Times of India blog -- I have referred in a letter below to RAW arranging for practitioners of an Indian discipline, whose understanding of gravity and inertia I called superior to that of Albert Einstein, to be physically attacked and driven away in Noida and Madhya Pradesh on the C.I.A.'s orders -- but such behavior of RAW employees, the behavior of desi people like Laloo Yadav and even thoroughly devout and traditional Indians and of all Indians in everyone's household, neighbourhood and community is profoundly determined by the terrorization and subjugation the British inflicted on Indians and this terrorization and subjugation is responsible for the fact that no Indian dares to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy for India …), for India’s nuclear supremacy to go forward.”Since I wrote the above, I have said that, instead of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches, Indians in a position to obstruct India’s nuclear supremacy over the most powerful white country will be destroyed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2009: In considering candidate substances that could be used to exterminate the population of a country by ‘salting’ its territory with radioactivity (addendum dated December 30, 2008 above), let us examine Polonium-210 which was used in the death of former Russian agent Litvinenko in Britain. It is produced in nuclear reactors by irradiating Bismuth-209, has a median lethal dose of 50 nanograms, a half-life of 138 days and is reduced to about one eighth of its original radioactivity about 18 months after production ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Litvinenko_poisoning and http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/06/AR2007010601491_2.html ). This half-life may be too short for the purpose above but substances with longer half-lives can be found.
Getting fissile material for ten thousand nuclear warheads is also necessary. The question is: can the ‘salting’ of the territory of the United States with radioactivity be done while keeping the regular, explosive thermonuclear warheads in reserve?
An IANS report in The Hindu (February 19 ‘09, Internet) is headed “Army takes a U-turn on Arjun tank” and says “army chief General Deepak Kapoor has written to the defence ministry appreciating the tank’s performance”. The question is: can it take a U-turn about arresting traitors (RAW employees, politicians, media people) as well as the invading Americans (addendum dated December 1, 2008 above)?
The following are posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(February 17, 2009)
On January 24, 2009 I had written:"JANUARY 24, 2009: RAW arranged for the emergency heart problems of Manmohan Singh, to use as grounds for replacing him as prime minister, if necessary, hoping this will forestall the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. After the reference to nuclear weapons as a great equaliser in the addendum above, it instructed Kakodkar to make a statement today against “dependence” on other countries in the matter of technology, placed a story in the media about a lot of high grade uranium in Meghalaya remaining untapped (due to political agitation, arranged by RAW, as I have said below) while India’s nuclear power plants run at half capacity and an editorial in Deccan Chronicle calling for India to carry out a nuclear test, also to forestall the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. All these moves will be reversed in a half second if there is no threat of the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. On a typical day, in the Internet edition of The Hindu, the top ten or so stories were about Obama, then one story about India without a reference to Obama or the United States, then another ten or so stories about obama or the United States and this has been typical of the Indian press. RAW has cut down on the number of stories about Obama. But unless the top ten or so stories on a typical day in each media organ are about the greatest living Indian, NOTHING has changed. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi should proceed."A day or so ago, a photograph showed the American ambassador and his wife walking alongside Manmohan Singh's wife in a 'Walk for Cancer' or such in New Delhi. It was meant to pass a message from the C.I.A. to Manmohan Singh through his wife that he will be airlifted out of India, by helicopter and plane, if necessary, as the U.S. airlifted Ferdinand Marcos out of the Philippines and was prepared to lift Indira Gandhi out of India after she lost the election after the Emergency. The United States has such arrangements with all its Third World ruler-puppets who are C.I.A. agents. Make no mistake about it: whosoever is meant to replace Manmohan Singh -- Mukherjee or Mulayam Singh Yadav or Sharad Pawar or whoever -- is no less of a U.S./C.I.A. agent than Manmohan Singh.A post on an Indian military discussion board on February 16'09 said:"Saw the army chief and it was crazy to see the security around him - 20 or 30 army-wallahs and 5-6 commandos. It was definitely overkill in an area that possessed that amt of security... The other chiefs were much less visible, came in very inconspicuously, with only ADC and 1-2 personal sec offrs. I wonder why the Army tamasha then!!"The answer is the army chief's enhanced security was due to his having been named as having been bought by the United States (above).There have been books by former C.I.A. employees which describe the kind of arrangement mentioned above that it has with a lot of Third World rulers. After Benazir Bhutto's death, when some pointed a finger of suspicion at the U.S. for having assassinated her, the U.S. said don't blame us; we were constantly giving her information about threats to her life. The C.I.A. supplies such information also as part of such 'security' arrangements with a lot of Third World rulers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(February 18, 2009)
In post # 11 above I said much of the United States' buying of people like India's army chief is done through K. Subrahmanyam who has been the king pin of C.I.A. operations in India for decades. He has also been in charge of media control. Many, if not most, of the people with Indian identities and quite a few with Pakistani identities posting even on this board are operatives of C.I.A.-RAW. In recent years C.I.A.-RAW has established profound control over India's print, broadcast and online media.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(February 18, 2009)
The Indian who urged people to read the column by Thomas Friedman referred to in the post above is an operative of C.I.A.-RAW. Almost all of the moderators on that board are also operatives of C.I.A.-RAW.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(February 18, 2009)
When it comes to love and admiration for their firangi enemies, most Pakistanis are no different from Indians, but, as I said in another thread, in Pakistan there are movements -- Jihadi movements, madarasa educated youngsters, etc. -- which do motivate many Pakistanis to fight their white enemies; in India, however, even such movements are lacking. After I wrote that, RAW started a "Ram Sene(Sena)" in India which attacked girls in pubs; the idea is to give the Americans justification for attacking/occupying India as they attack and partially occupy Pakistan.As I have said in another thread, many, if not most, of those posting on THIS board under Indian identites and quite a few posting under Pakistani identities are operatives of C.I.A.-RAW. As for hiding from them, if you click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 in the following thread, you will see how I have been under their surveillance for over three decades:- http://whatyoushouldknowaboutraw.blogspot.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States already occupies Afghanistan and partly occupies Pakistan on the pretext of fighting the Taliban and its progressive colonization of India described above continues apace. A report headed “Taliban has to be confronted and defeated: India” has the Minister of State for External Affairs Anand Sharma saying “There is no cause that can justify the killing of civilians” (The Hindu, February 19 ‘09, Internet). These traitors have to be exterminated first.
I would like to see the nuclear destruction of New Delhi before the end of this session of parliament, with some time left before the end of the session as margin of safety (they have been ending the sessions prematurely in their haste to get out of the area). The question is: will the media cover up referred to above end before that?
Lifting the media cover up requires reporting with banner headlines in all of the major print and broadcast media. This is easy to do since RAW controls PTI and hundreds of media organs, which have been obeying RAW regarding these matters, receive these press releases.
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 21, 2009: In the addendum of August 4 ’07 to December 6 ’07 below I wrote:
“Anyone in public life who is silent about nuclear supremacy for India is for nuclear supremacy for India's number one enemy -- the United States -- and deserves to be and will be shot as a traitor.
It should not be difficult for a political party, which wants development in its state, to identify at least twenty large new projects, requiring investment of at least a few lakh crores and demand that the Central government use the UNLIMITED amount of capital available to it (simply by printing the money, so long as the money is used for productive purposes, because the money so printed and invested increases the Gross Domestic Product by an amount equal to the amount of money invested IMMEDIATELY and by several times the amount of money invested over time; see my proposal about money in letters below, starting with the letter dated January 5 '04; as I have said in the letter dated February 26 '05 below and elsewhere, the Americans have been suppressing my proposal about money, because it is in the economic field what nuclear weapons are in the military field, while they promote inferior Indian niggers such as Subramanian Swamy and Manmohan Singh, both of them traitors on the C.I.A.'s payroll) to fund them, rather than allow the United States to make a surprise attack on India's nuclear installations from a Sethusamudram channel; this will induce other states to make similar demands and further money will be pumped into India's economy by the many, many fold expansion of India's nuclear and missile programs to build ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States -- a Ram Setu for the present.
Realising that he is nothing but a piece of dog-faeces and there is no advantage in disobeying the present day Incarnation, Advani has stopped talking about the Ram Setu from the past, though he is yet to speak about the Ram Setu for the present; the sooner all the other politicians come to this realisation, the better for the country and for them.
In a letter below I said that India's nuclear scientists that have been bought up will now sabotage India's indigenous nuclear program. Such sabotage has already started. As I said in an earlier letter below, one of the United States' objectives is to get Indian scientists to switch to designing 'proliferation resistant' nuclear reactors -- that is, reactors from which it will be difficult to get material for making weapons. In his speech to the IAEA in Vienna recently, Kakodkar said India is "actively pursuing the design and development of Advanced Heavy Water Reactor which will mainly use thorium [and] would meet ... proliferation resistance goals" (Indian Express, September 21 '07, Internet). This is grievous sabotage of India's nuclear program. The number of traitors -- thousands of RAW employees, politicians, media people, etc. -- that will have to be executed -- they include all those in public life who are silent about nuclear supremacy for India and, therefore, are for nuclear supremacy for India's number one enemy, the United States -- is so large that a practical way would be to line them up along trenches and machine gun them. Locations of such trenches could be along Raj Path in New Delhi and elsewhere.
When the United States sent its warships into the Palk Straits recently, in the area where it wants the Sethusamudram channel, it was in service of its plans to deny, by military occupation, India access to India's thorium deposits in case it cannot get India to switch to 'proliferation-resistant' reactors, etc. The International Atomic Energy Agency is a principal instrument of American imperialism used to provide grounds for invasions and occupation of other countries and calling its head an "honoured guest" of India is like Iraq's puppet government calling American occupation forces honoured guests of Iraq. Time is of the essence in acquiring nuclear supremacy for India and for removing, by machine guns and bulldozers, all those who stand in the way of India's nuclear supremacy.
An abandonment of the nuclear deal (the prospect of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches has changed the mind of UPA politicians who were otherwise quite ready for mid-term polls which are being cited as the reason for the change) must not divert attention from the most urgent pursuit of nuclear supremacy for India which remains a critical requirement and must be India's one-point agenda until nuclear supremacy is acquired and the threat from the United States is eliminated. While the nuclear deal was the United States' 'peaceful' option for imposing the deepest slavery on India, other options, including a surprise 'counter-proliferation' nuclear strike on India, will get priority as the nuclear deal is abandoned. The task before India remains building ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States and doing this in the shortest possible time with a single-minded effort that must determine policy in all other areas. Politicians -- who are nothing but pieces of dog-faeces -- cannot accomplish this task; they will continue to be obstacles in the way of nuclear supremacy for India and must still be machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches along with thousands of RAW employees, media people, etc.”
Since I wrote the above, I have said that, instead of machine guns and bulldozers, this will be accomplished by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. That time has come.
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 22-24, 2009: The Americans had arrived in Mumbai uninvited and said they did not need visas or papers and were “detained” by immigration and customs people. The Indian government, in terror of the United States, had no courage to keep them in custody or send them back and, after the fact of their invasion, pretended it had asked for the FBI’s and other U.S. agencies’ “help”. The Americans went along with this pretense. As the complaint to a court by the lawyer for one of the Indian detainees about a night-long bodily assault with numerous injuries on him by an FBI agent after stripping him shows, the Americans are in charge, with the Indians playing a subordinate role from the Home Minister on down and have been running an Abu Ghraib like operation on Indian detainees in India. The Americans getting ‘permissions’ from Indian officials for various things is like the occupying Americans in Iraq getting ‘permissions’ from the “sovereign” Iraqi government for various things and Iraq’s “sovereign” government asking the Americans to stay and “help” it. From covert C.I.A. and American rule over India, the Mumbai operation was designed to transition to overt American rule over India and the subcontinent as a whole. The Americans being overlords in the ‘investigation’ of the C.I.A.-planned and executed Mumbai terror operation is the same template for American overlordship over India which Mukherjee signed in the Defence Framework Agreement before the nuclear deal and the nuclear deal itself. No amount of ‘exposes’ or reports of scandal will make any difference, only the changing of the reality on the ground. The Indians will continue to submit as they submitted to the scandal of the British rule over India. If New Delhi is not destroyed now with nuclear bombs, followed by the crash program for the nuclear arms build-up and its accompaniments I have described, India will never get out of the deepest slavery to the white man.
The following are posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know nothing about Satish Chandra. Click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 of the following thread if you would like to educate yourself:RAW: India's External Intelligence AgencyLord Macaulay's address to the British parliament, Feb 2, 1835:-"I have travelled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such caliber, that I do not think that we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation."The success of this program is seen in Indians -- from president and prime minister to parliament to the media -- exulting in Oscar awards from the white master for the British movie, "Slumdog Millionaire", which defecates on India and calling it their own.The British succeeded in this program because of their superiority in technology. India's RAW, India's Army chief, India's government and media -- all participate in the sabotage and suppression of the development of India's technology, as you will see if you click on the link above, as also in the suppression of India's greatest scientist and greatest living Indian who is kept under 24-hour satellite surveillance for this purpose by the Americans who spend hundreds of millions of dollars each year on 'neutralising' him.
Attached Images
73324700.jpg (19.9 KB, 1 views)
　
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since I wrote the above, the Americans have demanded access to Mumbai attack suspects in Pakistan, knowing that the Pakistanis "will continue to submit as they submitted to the scandal of the British rule over India" (see above) because they know the same cowardly Indian blood runs in the veins of Pakistanis.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A thunderous silence descends on both their Indian and Pakistani slaves when their slavery to the White Master is pointed out. 'Why are you asking us to fight the White Master? The task assigned to us by the White Master is to fight each other'.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You cannot shame or prod the Indians into action against the white master. Those in a position to block action -- they are in New Delhi -- have to be removed like so much inanimate matter. Two nuclear explosions are needed to move enough of this inanimate matter out of the way. This is a time sensitive task & has to be done without delay. Only technical or logistical reasons can justify any delay; otherwise this should go ahead at the first possible opportunity. There should be no hesitation in this. This is merely the first stage of a bigger task I have described -- nuclear supremacy over and extermination of the white race and the liberation of India.
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 28, 2009:
1) The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 14, 2009, the Minister of State for Commerce and Power, Jairam Ramesh, reportedly said no private companies will be allowed in the nuclear power field until the year 2020:No nuclear power plants for Pvt Cos till 2020- Policy-Economy-News-The Economic TimesIn fact, what he said was:""I do not foresee a role for the private sector in the first generation of production of nuclear power of 20,000 mega watt on strategic [emphasis added], safety, fuel and management grounds. Expansion of nuclear energy has necessarily to be based either on Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL) or on its joint venture with public entities as only such companies could take a 10 year perspective without worrying over cash flows, borrowings or meltdown," Mr Ramesh told reporters on Saturday. He was in Mumbai to attend the signing ceremony of a memorandum of understanding between the NPCIL and National Thermal Power Corporation." Since the target of generating 20,000 megawatts of nuclear power by 2020 included a large proportion from reactors imported from the United States and other countries, this meant no American or other private companies were to be allowed in the nuclear field in the first 20,000 megawatts of nuclear power, in effect nullifying a part (only a part; it did not nullify the disadvantages from importing light water reactors and fuel from Russia's government-owned entity and the deadliest and strategically fatal part of the nuclear deal -- the new IAEA agreement which brings additional Indian reactors and even research institutions such as the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research under restrictions and IAEA inspections, especially if this new IAEA agreement is ratified/finalised on the pretext that it is needed for the highly injurious import of light water reactors and fuel from Russia) of the C.I.A.-RAW-engineered treasonous, strategically suicidal nuclear deal with "its various aspects — replacing indigenous production of uranium and reactors with imports, the capping, rollback and elimination of India’s nuclear weapons program, media control and buying up politicians, scientists, etc. for this purpose"; see post # 1 in the following thread as well as the links at the bottom of that post:RAW: India's External Intelligence AgencyA couple of days ago, according to a press report, the AIDS woman (Sonia) told Jairam Ramesh to resign. It was the statement above by him which led to this "surprise" step. A report yesterday had a minister in the Prime Minister's office say that an amendment to the Atomic Energy Act to allow private companies in the field has already been prepared and will be passed right after the elections:Atomic Energy Act to be amended soonThat is, if the Prime Minister's office and the parliament, etc., still exist, which they won't. Click on the links at the bottom of post # 1 in the following thread:RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) After a letter of mine to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December, 1982 about the necessity for India to defend against a nuclear first strike by the United States, two strategic programs, both directed at defence against the United States, were started: the Integrated Guided Missiles Program and the Centre for Advanced Technology (CAT) near Indore. The slowing and suppression by India’s government of the strategic missiles program over the years is well known. The gutting of the strategic programs of CAT started during the Vajpayee government and now it has been turned into a civilian research facility that operates in collaboration with American research laboratories, allowing them to monitor it and eliminating its objective of developing defences against the United States.
3) The Bharat Rakshak online discussion forum, most of whose moderators are operatives of C.I.A.-RAW, does not allow a discussion thread on an indigenous Medium Combat Aircraft, only on imports, just as it has numerous threads inciting the vilest hatred toward Pakistan but promptly bans anyone who refers to India defending itself against the United States.
ADDED ON MARCH 2, 2009: The following are two posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
My reference to the Medium Combat Aircraft above has to be put in perspective. The following is what I said on January 25, 2008:-"The bottom line is that India must have military supremacy over all nations of the world -- which in this age means nuclear supremacy -- and since the United States is the most powerful nation in the world today, India's principal task is to attain nuclear supremacy over the United States and that cannot be attained by depending on the United States or other countries for 'aid'; India is quite capable of attaining nuclear supremacy over the United States and [India's C.I.A.-RAW-controlled media] try to prevent it by falsely running DRDO down, promoting foreign dependence and imports, etc., and this is part of the tactics foreign intelligence agencies use, through Indians on their payroll, to keep India down.India has no shortage of manpower and my proposal about money (click on the links at the bottom of post # 1 of the following thread: RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency ) can be used to make India both militarily and economically number 1 in the world but military supremacy -- that is, nuclear supremacy -- is even more important than economic supremacy because, without it, it can be subjugated and enslaved (let's leave out who does the subjugation and enslavement). All of the invaders who conquered and enslaved India came from much poorer countries than 'the Golden Hind'.DRDO is doing great work, but that does not mean things can't be even better. I have said that India should set up ten parallel DRDOs, each the size of the present DRDO and let three of them compete for a successful tank design, three for a successful figher plane and so on and let the best design win. The Soviet Union had a system of internal competition between government-owned design and production organisations of this kind and it can work for India also (though I don't think DRDO's work has suffered due to a lack of competition; having ten times as many people work on defence R & D may simply enable ten times as many things to be done). Another important point is that weapons such as tanks and fighter planes which carry human beings are a lot more difficult to design and produce than, say, intercontinental ballistic missiles which give a million times or more returns for the same investment of time and effort ('bang for the buck') so far as increasing a country's military power is concerned. Since India's principal aim should be nuclear supremacy, it should focus on designing and producing intercontinental ballistic missiles more than tanks and fighter planes; if you have nuclear supremacy over the United States, most other defence-related issues will take care of themselves. And, as I said, designing and building ICBMs that will do the job can be done a lot faster and require fewer resources, though India has the resources to build both ICBMs and tanks and fighter planes. The main advantage of focusing on ICBMs is time; it will bring India military supremacy a lot sooner than giving a lot of attention to tanks and fighter planes (which will never bring India military supremacy over the United States). Another point is that although India should build nuclear-propelled, nuclear-armed submarines carrying intercontinental ballistic missiles (SSBNs), like the ATV it is building, building these weapons platforms (SSBNs) is a lot more time and resource-consuming than building ICBMs that can be launched from road and rail-mobile vehicles. It is a mistake to make India's nuclear arsenal primarily a second strike resource (which is what SSBNs are good at); India's nuclear arsenal should primarily be for a first strike -- that is how you gain nuclear supremacy, by being able to carry out a successful first strike -- and a sufficiently large arsenal of road and rail-mobile ICBMs can be produced a lot faster than an arsenal based on SSBNs. Again, time is important. This does not mean India should not produce SSBNs, just that the emphasis should be on producing a large number of road and rail-mobile ICBMs. I also believe that India's anti-ballistic missile systems will be considerably better than those of the United States -- as DRDO has correctly said, its systems to defend against short and medium range missiles are already better than those of the United States -- if India can avoid sabotage by politicians and RAW on the C.I.A.'s payroll who try to shove american 'help' down India's throat. This is another reason India can afford to focus on road and rail-mobile ICBMs rather than on SSBNs (SSBNs are inherently difficult to destroy; with a really effective ABM system, India's road and rail-mobile ICBMs will also be difficult to destroy). Avoiding foreign 'help' is not a matter of 'false pride'; avoiding foreign help is essential for India's nuclear supremacy.Instead of ICBMs, India's nuclear weapons may primarily be delivered by the hyperplane (Avatar) under development. And its defence against enemy ICBMs may be provided by the space-based weapons, Durga (Directionally Unrestricted Ray-Gun Array) and Kali (Kinetic Attack Loitering Interceptor) systems."And it is necessary to put tanks and fighter planes in general in perspective. This is what I said on February 27, 2008:-"DRDO are India's real warriors, not the military. In the old days, the sword-makers could make the swords, but warriors had to wield them. Even today's tanks and fighter planes need warriors to drive or fly them. But DRDO, along with the nuclear scientists and production units such as Bharat Dynamics, can make nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles and the people who do the research and development and production can also push the button to send them off to obliterate the enemy. The military muscle from nuclear-tipped ICBMs is milllions of times greater than the power of tanks and fighter planes. The scientists and engineers are also the real soldiers. They should have their hand on the nuclear button, not the military or the politicians. The military simply obey the politicians and India's politicians are all traitors on the payrolls of the C.I.A. etc. The military are not needed to launch the nuclear-tipped ICBMs; that can be done by scientists and engineers pushing a button sitting at a desk. The tanks and fighter planes the military can drive/fly are insignificant and nearly worthless in the military power they provide. Since they (the military) also obey the traitor politicians and civil servants, they are worse than worthless. It is time scientists and engineers are recognised for what they are -- the true defenders and guardians of the country.The military should obey and take orders from DRDO; the same for civil servants and politicians. This can be done by amending the Constitution; if the politicians don't agree to amending the Constitution, it can be done in other ways."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
India Has No greater Enemy Than The United States
Click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 of the following thread:-RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency
Has anyone seen what I have said and am saying about the necessity for India to defend against the United States in any of the print or broadcast media? Why not? After reading what is in that link [or what is said below, starting from January 5, 2004], consider what it tells you about the control of India's media and, therefore, of its government, its population, its economy and defence, its future and its current fortunes by the United States.What does it tell you about the immeasurable injury to India's economy, its prosperity, its defence and well-being the United States has been committing? What does it tell you about the unfathomable depths of the United States' enmity and malevolence toward India? What does it tell you about the threat to India's survival, not just well-being, that the United States is? Is there anything in human history that exceeds the malice and depravity of the United States' acts toward India?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDED ON MARCH 3, 2009: The colonization of India by the United States continues apace. A PTI report today says: “In a bid to evolve a joint strategy to bring perpetrators of the Mumbai terror strikes to justice, top US and Indian officials on Tuesday asked Pakistan to extend cooperation in investigating the 26/11 attacks.
FBI Director Robert Mueller, who arrived here on Tuesday afternoon, held a series of meetings with Union Home Minister P Chidambaram and Intelligence Bureau Chief Rajiv Mathur among others. …”.
The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: India Has No greater Enemy Than The United States
To 'neutralise' the post above, the C.I.A., through RAW, masterminded the attack on Sri Lankan cricketers in Pakistan, as it masterminded the Mumbai attacks, to show many colonised cricket-loving Indians in government, who know about C.I.A.-RAW's masterminding of the Mumbai attacks but are too cowardly to point a finger at the United States despite a U.S. official, in testimony to the U.S. Foreign Relations Committee that I have cited in other threads, acknowledging U.S. masterminding of such terrorism, that the United States is just as much an enemy of Pakistan as of India. And since these cowardly Indians can only acknowledge Pakistan, not the United States, as India's enemy and your enemy's enemy is your friend, therefore the United States is India's friend. But the United States' enmity toward India has little to do with Pakistan and its scope and intensity remain the same even if there were no Pakistan, as is clear if you click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 in the thread [ http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence-military/16042-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html ] cited above.I have said in another thread that Pakistan is a firangi-controlled insurgency within India, created by the firangis to serve their purposes. The United States is the firangi nation in control of Pakistan now. We will rub the United States out of existence. But we would not like Pakistan to be hurt.

I have said that the depth of the firangis' malice toward India can be seen in the following from Lord Macaulay:-

Lord Macaulay's address to the British parliament, Feb 2, 1835:-

"I have travelled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such caliber, that I do not think that we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation."

The success of this program is seen in Indians -- from president and prime minister to parliament to the media -- exulting in Oscar awards from the white master for the British movie, "Slumdog Millionaire", which defecates on India and calling it their own.

How shall we rub the United States out of existence? I have said that in designing nuclear weapons for use against the United States, radioactive materials should be identified that can be dispersed over the territory of the United States, either via separate radiological weapons (“dirty bombs”) or as part of the regular thermonuclear weapons, that will so contaminate the territory of the United States with radioactivity that nothing will grow there for at least several years that can be consumed without getting a lethal dose of radiation. This will force the Americans who survive the nuclear bomb explosions on the four thousand largest population centers to eat one another till no one remains alive.

The ‘salting’ of the territory of the United States with such radioactivity can be done in a separate operation -- such as by unmanned aerial vehicles -- after its four thousand largest population centers have been destroyed by regular thermonuclear weapons. This requires that India be the dominant power after the initial exchange of, say, five thousand nuclear weapons between India and the United States. India has the leadership required for this but the cover up of the news and views of the leadership has to be lifted. Lifting this cover up is the first stage of India’s war for survival. As this cover up is lifted, many politicians, media people and, above all, RAW bosses such as the kingpin of C.I.A.-RAW operations in India for decades, K. Subrahmanyam, will try to flee to the United States and those who succeed will share the fate of Americans. Once the cover up of the news about the greatest living Indian is lifted, the genocidal intent and behaviour of the United States toward India will be clear. He has been writing about it for three decades.

In considering candidate substances that could be used to exterminate the population of a country by ‘salting’ its territory with radioactivity, let us examine Polonium-210 which was used in the death of former Russian agent Litvinenko in Britain. It is produced in nuclear reactors by irradiating Bismuth-209, has a median lethal dose of 50 nanograms, a half-life of 138 days and is reduced to about one eighth of its original radioactivity about 18 months after production ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Litvinenko_poisoning and http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/06/AR2007010601491_2.html ). This half-life may be too short for the purpose above but substances with longer half-lives can be found.Getting fissile material for ten thousand nuclear warheads is also necessary. The question is: can the ‘salting’ of the territory of the United States with radioactivity be done while keeping the regular, explosive thermonuclear warheads in reserve?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following is from a post I made today on the blog of Vikram Sood, former head of RAW:-"K. Subrahmanyam, former chairman of India's Joint Intelligence Committee, proudly refers to having been responsible for setting up the insurgency in East Pakistan that led to the creation of Bangladesh. But he was doing that as an agent of the C.I.A. just as he and RAW, as agents of the C.I.A., have set up the LTTE, etc., in Sri Lanka and insurgencies within India in Kashmir, Punjab, the Northeast, etc. Both RAW and the ISI function as branches of the C.I.A. If the ISI was involved in the recent Bangladesh Rifles mutiny, it was retaliating for RAW's setting up the insurgency in East Pakistan which led to the creation of Bangladesh, which I had referred to just before the BDR mutiny. But both RAW and ISI and other such entities function as nigger slaves and puppets of the C.I.A. In Sri Lanka, C.I.A.-RAW at one point had about seven different Tamil terrorist/insurgent groups and C.I.A.-RAW was making them all fight one another as well the Sri Lanka government [, as I described in a letter, which appeared in Indian Express, Delhi, just before Rajiv Gandhi‘s assassination by C.I.A.-RAW, in which I also referred to a report in the New York Times of his telling the foreign press in New Delhi that ‘the Indian army has gone berserk in Kashmir, human rights have been violated in Kashmir‘, in a bid to get U.S. legislators‘ support for continued support to him from the C.I.A. for the impending general elections because K. Subrahmanyam thought it will make me think he was assassinated because of what I wrote about him in that letter though he was actually assassinated because he had restarted India‘s nuclear weapons program because of what I said to Mrs. Marcos of the Philippines about nuclear weapons in the telephone conversation referred to above which the C.I.A. had duly communicated to him and because, after the first Iraq invasion by the United States, he had realized the truth of what I wrote to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December, 1982 about the threat to India from the United States, etc.]. Even the naxalite movement in India is sponsored and maintained by C.I.A.-RAW, as the Purulia arms drop and the cover up of the actual recipients of those arms and letting the captured arms-dropper go back to Britain on RAW's intervention shows. I have said India has no greater enemy than the United States and the same is true of both Pakistan and Bangladesh as well ....".
It should be clear from the above that India has had no effective government ever since its so-called Independence that would advance and protect India’s interests. The pretender governments since the so-called Independence cannot be allowed to continue. The United States is now establishing overt colonial rule over India. A new war of Independence is necessary. In a letter dated December 22, 1982 to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, I also referred to the United States’ plans for India’s break-up, referring to a report in the Washington Post quoting a U.S. “diplomat” in New Delhi as saying “If regionalism takes off in Karnataka and the Telugu people take off in Andhra Pradesh, we will have to take a serious look at what is happening…” and I wrote “The phrase “take off” is used for a positively desired and looked for state of affairs, such as economic “take off”. Clearly, the Americans are looking forward to India’s break-up and are asserting a right to intervene in it”. Those plans, through various C.I.A.-sponsored insurgencies in the subcontinent and intervention in the subcontinent at various points -- not just Kashmir -- and under various pretexts has continued. With the U.S. invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, partial invasion and occupation of Pakistan, the Defence Framework Agreement with India, the nuclear deal, bringing India under overt and direct C.I.A. and FBI control through the U.S.-sponsored Mumbai attacks, etc., the U.S. plans for India’s break-up, occupation and colonization have reached a take-off point. If this rapid and absolute enslavement of India is not stopped and reversed now, it will never be possible. It cannot be stopped except through war, because RAW’s media blackout of me makes it impossible to educate the public and its flagrant falsification of vote counts when I ran for the Lok Sabha from East Delhi in 1996 even when I had no chance of winning (when I described, in a letter to the press, what was done -- which had shocked even the government officials involved in running the polls -- after changing the Returning Officer in mid-stream, Vajpayee had the BJP candidate, who had won, resign from the seat), its blocking, like the C.I.A., my mail and other communications, forcing I.I.T., Kanpur (by immediately cutting the I.I.T.s’ budgets and putting a freeze on hiring) and the Indian Institute of Advanced Study in Shimla (by a “committee of secretaries of the Indian government” voting to force it out of the buildings it was housed in in Shimla) to abandon any plans to offer me a position, contacting, like the C.I.A. and forcing, with carrot, stick and harassment, anyone I came in contact with to induce harassment, denying me any income of any kind, robbing me of my money and properties in India, forcing me to live for six and a half months in an M.I.T. library that used to be open 24-hours, sleeping on the chairs at night and going without food for up to three weeks at a time, remaining semi-starved year after year after year, forcing me to move about forty times in four years within the Boston area for a place to stay, subjected to indignities and abuse suffered by prisoners, etc., etc., ( I am attaching to this E-mail about 70 comments by K. Subrahmanyam and the C.I.A. Director Michael Hayden posted under their own names -- another 70 or so of the most abusive comments by them were deleted by K. Subrahmanyam -- just this past August (2008) while intercepting and mutilating my articles on Merinews.com and harassing and making it impossible for me to post my articles there) makes it impossible to do it any other way.
ADDED ON MARCH 18, 2009: The following are eight posts I have made on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Echoing what I have been saying about the United States being the source and mastermind of all separatism and terrorism in the Indian subcontinent and other activities, even more injurious than terrorism, speaking yesterday at the 'India Today' conclave in New Delhi, " Musharaff accuses India of fomenting trouble in Pak: ... accused Indian agencies of fomenting trouble in his country. ... he claimed that India's Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW) were helping militants based in Afghanistan spread trouble in Pakistan. "We have to accept the reality. Your RAW does exactly what the ISI does [emphasis added]. My request is let us tackle [emphasis added] RAW and ISI to stop this confrontation," he said." (PTI report dated March 7'09 in Hindustan Times). Note that he did not deny that the ISI does what it is accused of doing. But he did not say that both RAW and ISI have been doing this as agents of the C.I.A.; rather, he said "let us tackle RAW and ISI to stop this confrontation", acknowledging that these activities of RAW and ISI have been IMPOSED on these two countries, that these two agencies are NOT under the control of these two countries. Imposed by who, unless he is suggesting these are rogue agencies acting on their own? Imposed by the United States' C.I.A. whose branches these two agencies effectively are but neither he nor Indian government officials acknowledge that. The following is a post I made three days ago on the blog of Vikram Sood, former head of RAW, in a thread titled "Pak terrorized by Demons It Created":-RAW is the demon that has been terrorising India, as I have shown in previous threads. RAW does this as a servant of a bigger demon, the C.I.A.Also see the first post in this thread:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence-military/16042-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html and the link at the bottom of the first post in the above thread.RAW can strike anywhere in India and the rest of the Subcontinent at will and it has demonstrated this hundreds of times since 1983. …/
The latest move of the United States to break-up and colonise India is to INVADE Sri Lanka on the pretext of rescuing 200,000 Tamils it says are being held hostage by the LTTE, though, as I have said, the LTTE is a creation of the C.I.A., through RAW -- one of the several insurgencies it has created in the subcontinent to break-up, invade, occupy and colonise the subcontinent and, if the LTTE is holding 200,000 Tamils hostage, it is at the instigation of and under instructions from C.I.A.-RAW:-"(K. P. Nayar in The Telegraph, Calcutta, of March 8 '09) US taps Delhi on Lanka Foray -- Washington to sound out menon on evacuation mission: [Washington, March 7] The Obama adminstration will sound out foreign secretary Shiv Shankar Menon on Monday on India's support for a US-led invasion of Sri Lanka to evacuate nearly 200,000 Tamil civilians trapped inside territory controlled by the [LTTE] with precariously declining stocks of food or medicine./ "We had some people there to look at the situation to identify what the possibilities might be. We would do whatever we can to help these people, assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asian affairs Richard Boucher told a group of South Asian journalists yesterday./ The plan to be put before Menon [in Washington] is for a marine expeditionary brigade attached to thye U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM) to go into Sri Lanka with the support of the US navy and air force, according to American sources privy to the plan." The Americans are planning to invade, occupy and colonise India through India's traitor government from the prime minister on down. But not only must the U.S. not be allowed to enter Sri Lanka, India has the responsibility, as I have said, to forcibly expel it from Afghanistan. The U.S.-sponsored separatist insurgency in Sri Lanka should be dealt with as the U.S.-sponsored insurgencies in Punjab, Kashmir and the Northeast.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
More than a year ago I said:-"Russia's foreign minister says "UN Security Council resolution on Iran [imposing sanctions on Iran] reflects Russia's interests". But the demand that a country obey your demands regarding non-proliferation of nuclear weapons is a demand that you will have the power to inflict instant death on that entire country without that country being able to do anything about it; it is a demand for the ultimate kind of slavery and no self-respecting country can, or ought to, submit to it. The only reasonable response to such a demand is to totally destroy such a presumptuous tyrant as soon as you are able to do so. Such a demand is a way of ensuring your own destruction in the not too distant future; it will be crazy for Iran or any other country which is subjected to such demands not to destroy you as soon as it is able to do so. Since countries like Russia are unthinking camp-followers of the United States which is the source of this attempt to impose this ultimate kind of slavery on other countries, the interests of Russia will best be served by destroying the United States as soon as possible because its mad dog behavior of trying to impose such ultimate slavery on other countries will otherwise lead to the destruction of the makers of such demands in the not too distant future."U. S. Admiral William Fallon (who was called "the sole bulwark against an American attack on Iran"), when commander of the U.S. Central Command and asked about war with Iran in an interview to Esquire magazine (April 23, 2008), said: "Get serious. These guys are ants. When the time comes, you crush them". This is how the United States views India and Pakistan also.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
More than a year ago, I also said:-"Slavery in nuclear matters also makes possible slavery in economic matters. In Special Economic Zones (SEZs), American companies use Indians as slave laborers-- paying them a fraction of what even the lowest paid American workers are paid-- to produce goods and services for the American consumer. In no way can the output of Special Economic Zones be considered a part of India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP), nor should the output of software export and call center, etc. (B.P.O.) operations--which meet the needs of American companies and American consumers-- be considered a part of India's GDP and most of the rise in GDP growth rate, being trumpeted by traitors, is from the SEZs and IT and B.P.O. operations. If a foreign enemy comes and commandeers millions of Indians to work as slave labor to meet the needs of its own people-- having them work within India rather than shipping them to America as slaves used to be shipped through native middlemen to pick cotton-- it is still slavery. I have written about the fallacy because of which exports and earning a lot of foreign exchange are considered a good thing and said 'A crore of goods and services sold domestically is worth several crores of goods and services sold abroad so far as the effect on India's prosperity is concerned'. The foreign exchange (such as dollars) you get by selling goods and services abroad can only ultimately be used to buy goods and services abroad which starts chains of economic activity in the foreign country (the United States) rather than in your own country and, through the 'multiplier effect' I have described, increases the GDP of the foreign country by several times the amount of the foreign exchange you obtained, not your own country's. A report on a mega refinery complex being set up in an SEZ on India's west coast by Reliance refers to the several thousand luxurious villas that will be built for foreign workers while Indian slave laborers will live in slave housing; the output of the refinery --gasoline-- will be used almost exclusively by American consumers but the environmental harm caused by the refinery will occur in India; by using Indian companies as a front-- in this case Reliance into which Americans will be putting their money-- American capital will be producing gasoline for American consumers using Indians as slave labor and transferring the pollution caused by the refineries to India. In no way can this SEZ be called a part of India's economy. Even in the IT sector, the largest Indian company-- Infosys-- is more than half owned by foreigners; hundreds of thousands of engineering graduates per year are being produced by Indian engineering colleges -- RAW, which runs the Indian government, acts as a branch of the C.I.A. against India and has engineered this use of Indian engineering graduates-- to work as software coolies for American companies (you do not need engineering graduates to provide payroll processing which is what Indian software coolies have mostly been doing) while many others work night shifts in the B.P.O. industry, in call centers, doing what does not require even a high school education to do in the United States. SEZs were set up in China by bribing people in the Chinese government to let American companies use Chinese people as slave labor for American consumers and all the Chinese in government now wear Western suits and send as many Chinese for higher studies and to settle in the U.S. as do Indians. To camouflage the true nature of this arrangement, the United States government regularly 'complains' to the Chinese government about the U.S. "trade deficit" with China, but in no way can American companies producing in China, using Chinese as slave laborers, for the American consumer and then shipping the products to the United States be considered 'trade'; it is slave trade but instead of the slaves' bodies, their products are being shipped to the United States. Because of Indians knowing English, Americans first used Indians for IT and B.P.O. but are now switching to manufacture as well, the basic paradigm being the use of the populations of China and India as slave labor for the American consumer by bribing people in the governments of these countries. In the case of Russia, the paradigm is to loot Russia's natural resources for the American consumer by bribing people in the Russian government. Because of the exchange rate, the slave laborers in the B.P.O., doing health-destroying work at night at a fraction of the wage rates of the lowest paid American workers, are paid large amounts in rupees (the foreign exchange goes to the government and can only be used ultimately to buy foreign goods and services and increase the foreign country's GDP, not India's, as I have said) which enables them to buy the output of ten times as many Indians while producing nothing for the Indian economy-- the goods and services they produce meet the needs of American consumers and companies, not Indian consumers and companies. One million B.P.O. workers suck up the output of, say, ten million Indians; ten million B.P.O. workers will suck up the output of a hundred million Indians, while producing nothing for the Indian economy. Thus, American companies, while using ten million Indians as direct slave laborers, will be using a hundred million Indians as indirect slave laborers because a hundred million Indians will be supporting the ten million Indians working for American companies as slave laborers. And, since these ten million Indians will be producing nothing for the Indian economy (no goods or services for the Indian consumer) and will be sucking up the output of another one hundred million Indians-- thus, they will be greatly REDUCING India's GDP available to the rest of the population, not adding to it-- the rupee salaries paid to these ten million Indians will be highly inflationary as well, further damaging the Indian economy. This applies to operations such as call centers (B.P.O.), software export and SEZs for export.Haryana's chief minister asked how else to provide employment to the state's population. By implementing my proposal about money (click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 of this thread: http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence-military/16042-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html ), India can have true and extremely rapid prosperity and full employment."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Americans are now planning to force India to modify its Thorium-based power generation program so it is "proliferation-resistant", so India is not able to get fissile material from it that could be made into weapons and are binding India into cooperating with their 'non-proliferation' initiatives for this purpose. Recently, the foreign minister of Pakistan, which has a minimal nuclear deterrent like India, said if Pakistan had not obeyed America after 9/11, the Americans would have come and done themselves what they told Pakistan to do and Pakistan would have been in the same condition that Iraq and Afghanistan are today (I heard an American radio host in Boston threaten an Indian caller similarly after 9/11 and India at least allowed American helicopters to monitor Kalpakkam and Arundhati Ghosh, India's former nuclear negotiator, said at the time she believed India was in a rollback mode of its nuclear program under American threats). Clearly, Pakistan had no deterrent against the United States. How many nuclear warheads can India launch against the United States and with what delivery vehicles? I have said India needs a minimum of ten thousand strategic nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them. Till it has them, India must not put a single additional reactor under IAEA inspections or safeguards beyond the ones that are already under such inspections and there should be no separation of civilian and military nuclear reactors. And it should never, ever, allow the United States, its number one enemy, with an infinite capacity and inclination for fraud and force, anywhere near its nuclear program. As I have said, when it comes to the United States, especially in nuclear matters, especially in dealings with non-white countries, agreements, laws, treaties, etc. mean nothing; only raw power counts. Among other things, it is planning to have Indian nuclear scientists work under American supervision and control. C.I.A. agent Mukherjee, while lying about India's technological capabilities in the nuclear field and thanking Bush for making proposed Indian dependence and slavery in this field possible, glowingly refers to plans to have Indian nuclear scientists work with American scientists (as a part of India's C.I.A.-controlled press, Hindustan Times in an editorial supporting the nuclear deal a couple days ago said India lacks advanced nuclear technology because Indians can only design and build nuclear reactors upto 220 MW whereas the international norm is 1,000 MW; in fact, India is building reactors upto 650 MW and, while opposing the import of 1,000 MW Russian reactors a few years ago, Indian nuclear scientists said that India's power transmission and distribution grids-- which are not under their control-- cannot handle the output of 1,000 MW reactors; Indian reactor designs are far in advance of American designs). A main purpose of having Indian nuclear scientists work with American scientists is to have them design 'proliferation-resistant' reactors for its Thorium-based power generation program so India cannot get fissile material for weapons from it; in other words, have them cut their own and India's throat.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Times of India of March 18 '09, K. Subrahmanyam has an article, based on and inspired by my post # 10 above, which refers to the United States' "colonial exploitation" of China for the American consumer with the help of China's "comprador" (which is a term used in Latin America for traitors/collaborators with the enemy) class. But, as I have shown in post # 8 above, other posts in this thread and elsewhere, he is the number one traitor in India who has been the king pin of C.I.A. operations in India for decades. I have said that much of the C.I.A.'s buying of people such as India's army chief, has been done through him. If you see the comments he and the C.I.A. Director, Michael Hayden, posted, which are referred to in my post # 8 above, on an article of mine on Merinews, after intercepting, mutilating and altering the article beyond recognition, he offered to transfer one crore rupees to my account within 48 hours if I would agree to help 'Indo-US relations'. I have said that India will exterminate the population of the United States by 'salting' the territory of the United States with radioactivity and forcing the Americans to eat one another till no one remains alive. Those traitors -- like K. Subrahmanyam -- who flee to the United States will share the Americans' fate.By the way, Advani's recent pledge to make the I.T. (Information Technology) industry in India 'India-centric' if the BJP comes to power is also inspired by what I have said in post # 10 above, which I originally said over a year ago, but that bugger, who, like all Indian politicians, is a beneficiary and participant in the C.I.A.-RAW's crimes against me and against India, also steals what I say while C.I.A.-RAW prevent India's media from reporting the news and views of the greatest living Indian. As I have said, K. Subrahmanyam has been in charge of C.I.A.-RAW's media control also. I have said that Advani's mentor, Vajpayee, has been a life-long agent of first the British then American intelligence agencies and the Kargil war was arranged by the C.I.A. to help him win the election that was pending after he had lost a vote of confidence as prime minister. K. Subrahmanyam was the head of the inquiry committee Vajpayee appointed to go into the Kargil war. And, besides making him head of a committee to decide India's long-term strategic goals, Manmohan Singh gave him a "Life-time Achievement Award" at a function attended by all service chiefs, etc. In other words, the C.I.A. decides India's strategic goals.Note that all this (for example, K. Subrahmanyam's offer to transfer one crore rupees to my account within 48 hours; when I did not respond to him, he said it was made 'humorously', upon which the C.I.A. Director, Michael Hayden, said "The C.I.A. has no sense of humor" and K. Subrahmanyam resumed the offer) is out in the open and pointed out to the Indian press through my press releases which passes them on to all the politicians, such as Advani, etc. , to people in government and many others but does not publish or report on them, just as a U.S. State Department official testifying to a U.S. Senate committee that the United States sponsors terrorist and extremist groups in Pakistan has been repeatedly cited in my press releases, besides several threads in this forum and all the Indian politicians, people in government, etc. know about it but none would raise a finger toward the United States, the most ferocious, in fact the only, enemy of both India and Pakistan and these slaves of the white man continue the charade of accusing each other.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is not just politicians and people in government and the media, etc., who are such slaves of the white man. The same is the case with the public at large; thousands of people at merinews.com saw that article on merinews.com and could see the comments by K. Subrahmanyam and the C.I.A. Director. This is what I said about Indians' slavery to the white man a couple of years ago:-"The refusal by pieces of filth such as Advani to recognise the United States as India's number one enemy is sustained by thousands of C.I.A.-RAW-inspired headlines in India's media such as "Indian-American becomes Governor of Louisiana" which should instead say "Indian rewarded for conversion to Christianity with governorship: As reward for conversion to Christianity at age 18, as Americans themselves admit and his numerous published essays and articles on his conversion, Indian made Secretary of Louisiana's Health and Hospitals at age 24, President of the University of Louisiana system at age 27, then Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services in Bush Administration, then member of U.S. Congress and now youngest Governor in U.S. at age 36" ( Bobby Jindal: The Story They Don’t Want You to Read CenLamar: On Life in Louisiana ). Even more important are the thousands of headlines that are missing from India's media, thanks to C.I.A.-RAW, the story they really don't want anyone to know, saying "India's greatest scientist and greatest living Indian publicly tortured in Harvard seminar, systematically and totally starved for up to 3 weeks at a time, made semi-starved and homeless and even blind for years, kept under 24-hour audio and video surveillance as well as surveillance of communications and electrical typewriter and computer use, document creation and photocopying, etc., by satellite for more than past 3 decades, systematically harassed and in poverty and neutralised and robbed of his work at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars per year, robbed of crores in his money and property in India by C.I.A.-RAW, forced back into exile in the U.S., all with full cooperation and participation of India's RAW and India's C.I.A.-RAW-controlled prime ministers, politicians and media -- to keep India poor, weak and enslaved: The most intelligent, most handsome man on Earth, a living Incarnation, plans nuclear supremacy for India in near future, to destroy India's number one enemy, the United States, with ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles and will machine gun and bulldoze into trenches all traitors who stand in the way."Indira and Rajiv Gandhi, both agents of the C.I.A. in its crimes against India, met a well-deserved fate. The white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India, was reportedly seen talking to her son, when she wanted to be private in public, in "a language that was not English", presumably in Italian; she has taught him Italian in case she has to flee India and move to Italy; she should move to Italy NOW, with her son and leave India to Indians. Vajpayee, another agent of the C.I.A. which even staged the Kargil war to make him win an election, has removed himself from public life but that will not save him from being machine gunned and bulldozed into a trench along with Manmohan Singh and many others. India's nuclear supremacy will move forward at full speed, without delay.There is a basic difference between the treason of Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee and that of Manmohan Singh. The holocaust after 1857 in which the British killed ten million Indians in the first decade to terrorize and subdue them was in large part committed with the help of Sikhs. This terrorization and subduing continued right up to the end of direct British rule, exemplified by the Sikh soldier, riding in a jeep with the British viceroy, cutting down with his submachine gun any Indian, man, woman or child, that came in view on either side of the road. The role of the Sikhs, who were originally founded to save India from foreign invaders -- the invaders were then Muslims -- reversed from 1857 on and they became a principal instrument of the British terrorization and subjugation of India. The Sikhs know how successful this terrorization and subjugation was -- it is this terrorization and subjugation because of which Indians today dare not even mention nuclear supremacy for India much less demand it -- and their role in it determines their attitude toward whites and toward Indians. This is why Manmohan Singh considers himself answerable to no one except Bush and the white man as he imposes the terrorization and subjugation of the nuclear deal on India, makes no attempt to hide his loyalty to the white man and shows open contempt for Indians.The struggle against the nuclear deal is a continuation of the 1857 War of Independence and it must end in nuclear supremacy for India and destruction of India's present day imperialist enemy -- the United States. Like Manmohan Singh and others praising British rule over India (he did that when receiving an honorary doctorate from Cambridge University; he was prime minister of India at the time), there are many Indians who praise American rule over India. Like the many Indians loyal to Queen Victoria, there are many Indians loyal to the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India. All these Indians must be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches (a simple test is to ask "Are you for nuclear supremacy for India?"). India's nuclear supremacy must be and will be established. Only then will the War of Independence be won.In an American response to the above two paragraphs (other responses are American officials such as the Treasury Secretary aggressively telling India, in the manner of the East India Company, to totally open up its economy to American investment -- that is, American ownership of India -- and making it "very clear" that India must have no dealings with Iran) a column in the New York Times of October 26 '07 calls Indians doing outsourced work the white man's "external cognitive servants". But Indians are also being turned into the white man's military servants, just as they were under the British, in Mesopotamia in World War I -- as Iraq was called then -- and elsewhere (as I mentioned in a letter below, Manmohan Singh was celebrating millions of Indians serving as Britain's military servants, fighting whoever and wherever the British wanted them to, in WW I and II), as they participate in military exercises such as Yudh Abhyas held in Alaska last month which "was conducted in an 'Iraq-like' environment with Indian and US troops staging a mock attack on an 'Iraqi village' controlled by an insurgent [this is the imperialists' name for Iraqi patriots fighting foreign invaders] group and simulating roadside bombings and suicide attacks" (IANS, N. Delhi, October 26 '07). The white man's Indian servants, whether cognitive or military, prefer to serve white masters rather than India because of higher pay and the advantages of serving the more powerful and the power factor supersedes and encompasses within it the higher pay factor. Indians will not stop being traitors and serving India's imperialist enemies and start serving India unless India acquires nuclear supremacy which is necessary for overcoming the terrorization and subjugation imposed on them by the holocaust perpetrated by the British (the Americans, who have already killed millions out of Iraq's 24 million population, are trying to similarly terrorize and subjugate the Iraqis and, instead of fighting a common enemy with the Iraqis, the white man's Indian servants, already terrorized and subjugated, are preparing to serve the imperialists further). Nuclear supremacy -- which will automatically entail destruction of the imperialist enemy because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy -- must be India's one-point agenda and all those who stand in the way of nuclear supremacy, including the likes of Vajpayee and Advani not just Manmohan Singh, his cabinet and thousands of RAW employees, must be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches.In war, officers are under orders to execute on the spot any soldiers who are too terrorized to fight or obey orders to advance on enemy positions. This keeps the remaining troops battle-worthy and able to fight. The terrorization and subjugation Indians have undergone at the hands of the British is responsible for Indians refusing to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy over the United States. It is necessary to execute -- machine gun and bulldoze into trenches -- at least a few thousand such Indians, who are in key positions -- such as RAW employees, politicians and media people -- to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy (they may be terrorized or bought up or both though being bought up is greatly facilitated by being terrorized; the terror, when long standing, is usually repressed meaning unconscious and being subjugated often involves both terror and carrot but terror is the foundation of the treason of RAW employees and people such as Vajpayee and Mani Shankar Aiyar though all they may feel is love and loyalty for the white man; terror facilitates such love; a former head of RAW, Vikram Sood, in a column in Hindustan Times, repeatedly quoted the white/Christian head of the missionary school he attended as the fount of all wisdom on various issues and referred to Indians as worshippers of snakes and monkeys on a Times of India blog -- I have referred in a letter below to RAW arranging for practitioners of an Indian discipline, whose understanding of gravity and inertia I called superior to that of Albert Einstein, to be physically attacked and driven away in Noida and Madhya Pradesh on the C.I.A.'s orders -- but such behavior of RAW employees, the behavior of desi people like Laloo Yadav and even thoroughly devout and traditional Indians and of all Indians in everyone's household, neighbourhood and community is profoundly determined by the terrorization and subjugation the British inflicted on Indians and this terrorization and subjugation is responsible for the fact that no Indian dares to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy for India; Laloo Yadav recently said he held a lathi rally of farmers against American imperialism but he dares not demand anything effective -- lathis cannot defeat American imperialism -- such as ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States), for India's nuclear supremacy to go forward."Since I said the above, I have said that, instead of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches, traitors who are blocking India's independence will be removed by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
------------------------------------------------------------------
There is an analogy between the lifting of the 'repression' that allows repressed thoughts and feelings to emerge into consciousness in psychotherapy and the problem of lifting the media cover up which keeps the facts of the white man and the most powerful white country, the United States, being India's most ferocious enemy from emerging into the public's consciousness. Lifting of this media cover up will be analogous to lifting of repression in psychotherapy, the patient being the public of India as a whole rather than an individual. Beneficial changes that occur in psychotherapy are often ascribed to the lifting of repression, but the lifting of repression itself is a consequence of changes in the situation that enable the threatening thoughts and feelings to emerge. It is fear, anxiety and such emotions evoked by the repressed thoughts that keep them from emerging into consciousness and it is a change in the situation -- such as the empathy and support of a powerful and respected authority figure, the therapist -- which reduces the fear and anxiety and enables the repressed thoughts to emerge. The bottomless dread of the white man, caused by the incomparable military supremacy over Indians of the British and now the Americans -- note the post above about the United States' view of the people of countries like Iran, India and Pakistan as "These guys are ants ... When the time comes, you crush them" -- and the exercise of their power by the British after 1857, killing over ten million Indians in just the ten years after 1857 (I have cited elesewhere The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh): "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:...") which continued right up to 1947 -- is responsible for the 'repression' which is the media cover up of the facts regarding the ferocious enemy that the United States is of India. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will change the situation so that India will be able to use its human and material resources to build a nuclear arsenal to destroy the enemy that is the United States while also lifting the media cover up of the facts which show that India has no greater enemy than the United States.Since the 'repression' is due to fear of the military might of the white man -- the white man's economic advantages are a consequence of his military might which can be used for the economic exploitation of the weak as I have shown above -- the change in the situation has to involve the exercise of military might. At the moment, India has the ability to exercise its nuclear might against the traitors in New Delhi who block the build up of India's nuclear arsenal so it can destroy the enemy that is the United States. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will make possible such build up. I have shown elsewhere how the financial and other wherewithal for such build up is available to India.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today the C.I.A. Director is visiting India. India's colonisation continues apace. As in any war, time is of the utmost importance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Threats and verbal ‘psy ops’ can accomplish many objectives. If merely verbal measures -- including threats of war -- could deal with all situations, actual war will never be necessary. India’s liberation from the terrorization and subjugation it has been subjected to cannot be accomplished without actual war. The first stage of this war is the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. The second stage is the extermination of the population of the United States.
The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have shown elsewhere that:i) Five thousand nuclear warheads of 200 kilotons each used by India against the United States will have a total yield of one thousand megatons which equals the total yield of just twenty of the fifty megaton hydrogen bomb the Soviet Union once tested.ii) I have said that India will have nuclear supremacy over the United States. An article in 'Foreign Affairs' magazine a couple of years ago said the United States already has or is close to having "nuclear primacy" over Russia -- that is it can destroy all of Russia's nuclear weapons in a first strike without suffering any nuclear detonations on its own territory -- though Russia still has thousands of strategic nuclear warheads. I have said that India's objective will be to exterminate the population of the United States by 'salting' its territory with radioactivity and said "The question is: can the 'salting' of the territory of the United States with radioactivity be done while keeping the regular, explosive nuclear warheads in reserve?” In a situation in which India has nuclear supremacy over the United States, the answer to this question is 'Yes'.iii) I have said "Threats and verbal ‘psy ops’ can accomplish many objectives. If merely verbal measures -- including threats of war -- could deal with all situations, actual war will never be necessary. India’s liberation from the terrorization and subjugation it has been subjected to cannot be accomplished without actual war. The first stage of this war is the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. The second stage is the extermination of the population of the United States."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDED ON MARCH 20, 2009: Thirty five years ago, living in upstate New York, I used to tell other Indians (in 1967, in a graduate dorm at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, a white American called me “ Brown man’s burden”; for those unfamiliar with it, Kipling‘s phrase “the white man‘s burden“ to refer to British colonial rule over India has been used ever since to justify the white man‘s claim of superiority and dominion over non-white people) :-

i) “The only place on Earth where the classical culture, of which Greece was one branch, still exists, is rural North India.”

ii) “At the height of its Golden Age, the standard of living in Greece was that of a typical Indian village.”

iii) [I also used to emphasise that] “The barbarians of Europe were the enemies of the Greeks”.
That classical culture no longer exists in Greece. With the advent of television, it is about to be wiped out from India also. But India is going to wipe out the barbarians. So long as vegetarianism exists in India, that culture has not been wiped out.

This is what I said in a letter to the press in 2001 (see http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474-page11.shtml):-

“If ever there was a case for a United Nations' military intervention, the destruction of ancient statues in Afghanistan is one. India's government ought to drop paratroops where the destruction is occurring or threatened and send in planes and tanks, as planes and tanks are being used for the destruction. But the United Nations should move whether or not the Indian government does. I have shown elsewhere that India's government and people can accurately be described as "Criminal Blackie Slaves". India's armed forces are among the largest in the world but what are the chances that they have a contingency plan to take control of Afghanistan--a part of traditional India--if necessary (the United States' armed forces have a plan for every contingency)? India's lazy and stupid generals spend their time saluting Criminal Blackie Slaves such as India's prime ministers & each other; hence the necessity of UN intervention. (A news item in the Indian press today says China has said it will not press India and Pakistan to hold talks--because of my reference, below, to the Indian government killing tens of thousands of its own people in self-staged terrorist incidents to be able to say to the White Master it will not hold talks till such incidents stop. Note that the people of Afghanistan & Pakistan as well as Kashmir are Indians forcibly converted by handfuls of invaders--just as Indians were ruled for centuries by a handful of the British from across the seven seas--and now hate Indians for not protecting them. The Taliban's behavior is a variation on the theme of the 'Stockholm Syndrome', like Patty Hearst embracing the cause of the Symbionese Liberation Army. As to what turned India into a land of Patty Hearsts--that has to do with the 175 foot tall statue of Buddha the Taliban is destroying).”

The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The C.I.A. person who posted above is not the only C.I.A. person posting here. The same person posts under multiple user names, as do the RAW operatives.After my referring in a 2001 letter (post # 19 above) to 'India's lazy and stupid generals spending their time saluting criminal blackie slaves such as India's prime ministers and each other', India's service chiefs had stopped saluting Vajpayee as prime minister and they used to send junior officers to see him off at the airport where Vajpayee saluted them while they simply shook his hand. That was one of the reasons Vajpayee started referring to me simply as "Pakistan". But, as I have said, a lot more is needed than just stopping saluting the prime minister. Gen. J. J. Singh, a Sikh, started saluting the Sikh prime minister, Manmohan Singh, again. As I have said, Vajpayee has been a life-long agent of first British intelligence agencies and later the C.I.A. and Manmohan Singh was the C.I.A.'s appointee as Finance Minister in P. V. Narasimha Rao's cabinet in 1991, as a column by Ashok Mitra in The Telegraph also pointed out. And India's current chief of the army staff, Deepak Kapoor, has been bought by the United States, as I have pointed out in posts elsewhere (see this thread: India's Army Chief Was In Conspiracy To Sabotage Indian Missile Test ).

If you go to the American online newspaper thecurrentonline.com ( http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 ), you will see my letter dated December 20, 2001 saying, in part, "Mr. Bush hasbeen citicized for not knowing the nameof the Indian prime minister but that deserved applause because a mind uncluttered with trivia is necessary to focus on the essentials and make good decisions (when I once talked to this prime minister on the telephone, I did not know how to pronounce his name)." Elsewhere I have mentioned how Vajpayee was forced to give up control of India's nuclear weapons and turn it over to the Indian president, K. R. Narayanan, after, in a letter to the press, I expressed doubt about his loyalty and trustworthiness and said how the 1998 nuclear tests were conducted by him on the C.I.A.'s advice, with prior arrangement with the U.S. government because, in a letter to the press in 1998, just before Vajpayee assumed office as prime minister, I wrote, 'India's stupid current prime minister [I. K. Gujral] keeps talking about the necessity for Indians to "inculcate" the scientific spirit in themselves but what the Indians need to inculcate in themselves is hatred for the white man (and woman)', to which Vajpayee replied "Hate is not on the agenda", to which I replied that this amounted to saying "Defence is not on the agenda"..." because, I said, in army training, for example in bayonet practice, you are taught to hate the enemy; it is essential if you are to survive and win. The C.I.A. advised him to conduct the tests to 'neutralise' this.

Regarding Vajpayee's party, a news headline today says "BJP disowns Varun, say hate speech not party agenda" : http://ibnlive.in.com/news/bjp-disowns-varun-says-hate-speech-not-party-agenda/88257-37.htmlBut whereas Varun Gandhi is reportedly engaging in hate speech toward Muslims, I have said Indians need to inculcate in themselves "hatred for the white man (and woman)". I explained in a letter many years ago how Indians express hatred toward the erstwhile Muslim conquerors (forgetting that most Muslims of the Subcontinent are not foreign conquerors but Indians converted by the conquerors) because Muslims, domestic or foreign, are no longer powerful but lick the boots of the white man, the current enemy, because they are terrified of the immeasurably greater power of the white man.

After one of my posts on the blog of Vikram Sood, former head of RAW, a RAW employee made a post there referring to me as 'This P a k i nut'. Those who would like to educate themselves should click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 of the following thread:-RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDED ON MARCH 22, 2009: The following is a post I made today on the blog of Vikram Sood, former head of RAW:-
The loathing, contempt and hostility the Muslims of the Subcontinent may feel for India is fully understandable considering they were Hindus forcibly converted by foreign invaders in a country that has a thousand year history of being over-run by successive waves of invaders from various countries without doing anything effective about it. Conversion is preferable to having your head chopped off and being used to build a tower of heads. It was the pacifism of Buddhism and Jainism that was partly responsible for it and so it is understandable that the Taliban demolished those nearly 200 foot tall statues of Buddha. As for their suppression of women, practically all societies throughout history have suppressed women, denied them education, the right to participate in public life or even go into the public, whether it was Victorian England or the United States where women got the vote only recently after a long struggle. Someone who I knew well lived in a town about 20 miles from Delhi in a very traditional Hindu zamindar family in the heart of India's heartland and had seven sisters. Their father had a science degree from Benares Hindu University. There was a junior high school for girls in town and there was no question of girls being allowed by their grandfather to go out of town to study beyond junior high school (though they could do further studies at home with tutors) whereas the boys could go anywhere and study to whatever level they wanted. Only after the grandfather died were the remaining unmarried girls able to go out of town and get bachelor's and master's degrees as did those already married to a lawyer and a professor. When an uncle, an amateur photographer, of the girls took a marriage photograph of one of the girls and coloured her lips red in the prints, the grandfather was very angry. Purdah has been just as strict in mainstream Hindu society as among Muslims. True, purdah among Hindus is due to the Muslim conquest of India but the point is the Taliban are not doing anything radically different from what Hindus in the Hindu/Hindi heartland have been doing for a thousand years or so. I don't think the Taliban women commit Sati on the funeral pyres of husbands as Hindu women did till recently, as the ultimate expression of female virtue, to be forever worshipped by the public afterwards; nor do their women jump into huge bonfires to kill themselves when the men go out to fight the American or NATO invaders as Hindu women regularly and frequently did to save their honour while their men in Rajasthan tied saffron bands on their heads and went out to fight and die to the last man against the Muslim invaders. This is the stuff of Hindu pride and they were infinitely more glorious than the cowardly slaves in New Delhi of Americans and the white man who dare not arrest and deport American officials who arrived uninvited after the Mumbai attacks and claimed they did not need papers to come and exercise jurisdiction over India. I have shown elsewhere (http://NuclearSupremacyForIndiaOverUS.blogspot.com ) how those ten sons of India, outnumbered a thousand to one in Mumbai, deserve India's highest civilian award -- Bharat Ratna -- for exemplary self-sacrifice and the highest award for valor -- the Param Vir Chakra."Taliban" is plural for Talib which means "student". What can one have against students? Character-wise, they are infinitely superior to the cowardly, degenerate slaves of the white man who constitute the Indian government in New Delhi.
As for the intercepted communications between those ten men who, I have said, were targeting India’s enemies and their handlers, there is an inscription in Greece saying “Go tell to Sparta thou that passest by that here obedient to their word we lie” (see Nehru’s ‘Glimpses of World History’).
ADDED ON MARCH 25, 2009: The reason India’s armed forces obey criminal traitors like Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh is that RAW has been suppressing India’s real leader for the Americans so that the Indian public does not even know he exists. I said above the army can lift this cover up with its bayonets but the traitor who has been supervising the cover up also bought the army chief, so the only way to do it is with the nuclear destruction of RAW headquarters and North and South Blocks.
It is no accident that so many of the traitors through which the Americans control India are South Indians. In the addendum dated December 8, 2008 above, I referred to the American plan to separate north and central India from the south and to treat it as part of the Middle East, because they know they will have no problem controlling the south. Until India destroys the United States, these traitors will be a constant conduit for American control of India.
Just before Indira Gandhi’s assassination, she was warned about the danger from her Sikh body guards and she replied how can we claim to be ‘secular’ (?) if they are removed. After Shiv Shankar Menon returned from Washington after finalizing the traitor deal known as the nuclear deal, Jaswant Singh, a former Foreign Minister, loyally congratulated him for a “superb job” of negotiating. A couple days ago, in Singapore, where K. Subrahmanyam’s son has been ambassador and, while ambassador in Singapore, did most of the negotiating of the nuclear deal in Washington, Jaswant Singh said if the BJP comes to power it will not abrogate the nuclear deal and may only make very minor changes while implementing it because otherwise India’s credibility in international agreements will be in jeopardy or some such nonsense. These buggers have no perspective about India’s life and death interests and being ‘loyal’ to their traitor underlings.
Has anyone seen any stories in the Indian media about K. Subrahmanyam offering to transfer one crore rupees into my account within 48 hours on behalf of the C.I.A. Director (see above)? Why not? Doesn’t the fact of Americans talking of separating north and central India from the south tell you they know they are the rulers of India and can do anything they want to it? Does this bother anyone? The only Indian who is bothered by American rule over India is the one being suppressed by RAW on behalf of the C.I.A. Does this bother anyone?
ADDED ON MARCH 27, 2009: It is no accident that the Indian National Congress, founded by a Britisher, A. O. Hume, was a creation of the British, as a safety valve after the 1857 Mutiny and after the violent ‘pacification’ of India -- see description, above and below, of the holocaust killing over ten million in just the ten years after the Mutiny -- was substantially complete. This creation of the British was later used, through M. K. Gandhi (the Mahatma), to divert Indians into pacifist nonsense -- actually, pacifist poison. I have said repeatedly, above and below, that Jawaharlal Nehru was a lifelong British agent. When I said the same thing about M. K. Gandhi on an online discussion forum some years ago, the abuse was so virulent it was clear Indians were not ready to be enlightened on that yet. Now I find some others are saying what I said, for example, in these posts today on the Bharat-Rakshak on line forum:-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (By Surinder:) As an aside, I think analyzing this phase of history is critical. One thing that has always struck me when I read the type of disjointed rootless history that we can obtain in India is that despite the fact that MKG supposedly fought to end British rule in India, his actions had an uncanny outcome: they seemed to help the British, or hurt them very very minimally. Even when Tilak etc. had asked for Complete Swaraj, MKG was proudly proclaiming his allegience to the British. He seems to have been jailed just enough to make him a leader. (just enough to give him credibility to the masses, but not severly enough to break his spirit.) The type of soul-sapping incarcerations of Guru Ram Singh, Savarkar, Tilak were not meted out to him. His wasn't sent out to Kalapani in Andamans, Burma, or Singapore. He was not lathi charged like Lajpat Rai, nor liquidated like Bhagat Singh. He never met with any accident, or any desease or any assasinations by others (pre-1947). If anything, his hold on the INC seems guided and facilitated. Despite fighting the British or wearing the loin cloth, there is an unmistakable sense of MKG looking up to and being intimidated of the British. At no point did MKG stood up and challenged the basic right of the British to be here in India. He, as you said, played by the rules. He did not proclaim that British were persona non grate in India. He never seemed to have challenged the very right of British to be here; he seemed happy with the role of a supplicant to the British court.Then you couple this with some puzzling bizzarre things like Caliphate movement, support of JLN, opposition to Bose & Bhagat Singh. (with Bhagat Singh, there is some prevarication he indulges in.) He does not take a cue from Bhagat Singh or Bose that they did not even recognize the British right be in India. While he comes out as fanatically non-violent, his support for WW-1 & 2 is puzzling to say the least.Coming back to his support for JLN; it seems irrational. Gandhi is dhoti clad devout ascetic brahmchari Hindu; JLN is an upper class pseudo-English almost-Muslim-in-taste athiest who has an affair with Mountbatten's wife. They could not be more different. Patel, if anything, was closer to him in tastes and likes and dislikes. Not to mention that MKG's support for Muslim causes and his fasts for releasing funds to Pakistan are exactly in line with the British support for the Pakistanis & Muslims. It is as if British are directling a show ... they direct Jinnah to some acts, then direct MKG to do things ... all of this ends up as a big pathway for TSP's formation.I hate to say it, but looking at all the disparate bizzarre events it seems to be as if MKG himself might have been an agent of the British themselves. Maybe paid, maybe unpaid, maybe just manipulated. I certainly don't have proof, but if proof came it would not seem outlandish to me. There seem to be too many winks and nods of him with the British.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Rahul Mehta:) 1. Britishers also helped Mohanbhai by ensuring that ToI gives a lot of coverage to Mohanbhai. More the publicity, the youth will fall in love without even understanding what vision he has, if at all he has any vision. 2. Mohanbhia's dukaan of Satya, Ahimsa, Khaadi needed huge subsidies round the clock. The youth would spin charkhaa and produce Khaadi which was garbage. Its sale value was below the cost !! And so huge subsidy was needed to support charkhaa spinning. And bhajan singing also needed subsidies. The cash came from elitemen such as Bajaj and Birla. If Viceroy had just made a phone call and threatened Bajaj et al not pay a dime to Mohanbhai, the Mohanbhai's dukaan would gone bankrupt. IOW, British allowed Birla et al to fund Mohanbhai's Satya, Ahimsa, Khaadi dukaan. 3. Why did Britishers let Birla et al fund Mohanbhai? Because if Mohanbhai's dukaan selling Ahimsa and Satya were to close, the charkha spinning and bhajan singing youth would start looking for alternatives. There was no youtube or BR back then to keep the restless Indian youth busy . So if Mohanbhai's dukaan were to close, some of the youth might have started opting for Bhagatji's ways and means to get freedom, which would have increased British casualties to a point that Brits may be forced to leave India without getting chance of shaping new India.So Mohanbhai was keeping the youth busy by making them spin charkha, sing bhajans etc rather than teach them weapon use. There by, Mohanbhai was preventing youth from becoming followers of Bhagatji. So Britishers helped Mohanbhai by asking ToI to print photo of Mohanbhai everyday and let Indian elitemen fund the dukaan of Mohanbhai. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Surinder: ) Rahul Mehta, Interesting points. What you say only adds to the points I raised. I want to add one more thing: British, for all their faults, are very pragmatic people. This quality allows them to manage conflicts and problems with least cost. Mind you, I did not way "wise", for if they were they would not be enslaving 1/4th of humanity to enhance their standard of living. Americans also have this uncanny pragmatic side.Now they quite very well understood that some escape valve is needed in India. So they formed the Congress Party, started by a Britisher, of all people. This is party is encouraged to be the sole speaker of Indians. Its leaders are British educated pseudo-Brits, with English tastes and sensibilities, but not the British war-like fighting spirit. They were all people who had not ability to wage physical war, even if their life depended on it. Few of them were sons of the soil. British pragmatism meant that they understood that the leaders cannot be viewed as complete lackeys (that will destroy their credibility), so they were given light sentences, they were "honored" with frequent meetings with British. I mean what are the chances that Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Bose, Azad would be granted a meeting and Britain would be seen negotiating with them?None of its preferred leaders like Gandhi, JLN etc. are lathi-charged like Lala Lajpat Rai, or shot like those in Jallianwal Bagh, or shot like Azad. None of them are sent to 10 years rigorous imprisonments like Savarkar and countless others. These led by Gandhi propose a strategy to fight freedom which is unique in human history: they felt quite comfortable in the role of supplicants (beggers if you will) in the court of the British. JLN had an affair with the wife of the person he is supposedly negotiating. (Talk about Conflict of Interest!!!). If the British truly wanted to get rid of JLN, Gandhi etc., there are numerous ways: small accidents, auto accidents, mysterious illnesses, family feuds, riots where they could be eliminated. The most bizzarre, and in my opinion the most revealing, is the amazing coincidence of Gandhi supporting both World Wars (which were British do or die wars).You mention TOI, who owned it at that time?You mentioned Birla. This is also interesting. There is no way Brila would make money if the British were angry with him. They could liquidate him in no time, if they wished. The fact that they let him finance Gandhi is highly suspect.All this, of course had enormous implications for India. It still does. This set up the tone of the nation after independence too. The progeny of JLN still rules India and lives in the best addresses in India with no known source of income. The family of Bose, Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev lives in penury.Thanks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Rahul Mehta:) Thanks . And pls note -- whatever I have thought, derived and said in all threads in all posts till date is trivial and obvious. The only non-trivial and unobvious thing that always comes to my mind is -- why others before me did not think of all this?---
Abhi_G wrote:
Rahul Mehta ji thanks for the business angle.It would be nice to know the role of the native business houses in those times. If the indigenous business houses were funding the INC, then the tacit understanding of not having a war/unrest inside the country does have some value. Although, that line of logic fails completely, when the nation faces threats of complete annihilation. If the survival of the state is paramount, there are no second chances but to have war. Was the INC committed to the preservation of the native business interests in the pre-independence period that propelled them to make compromises? Although it seems that post independence, their policies completely changed and Indian industries suffered right until the 90s.Welcome . And now we are coming to REAL juice --- analyzing role of Indian elitemen back then. Many times we all blame Mohanbhai for doing this or not doing that. We forget that Mohanbhai was dependent on ToI and other mediamen for fame and he was dependent on Indian elitemen for funds. And without fame and funds, Mohanbhai was zero. So he could not have taken steps that would have resulted in drastic loss of support of elitemen or media-owners. So many steps he took, that we now dislike, was due to the Mohanbhai's dependence on funds and mediamen. eg He cooked up garbage called "trusteeship of private property". Was he on weeds? NO. He cooked this garbage so that gullible volunteers can be misguided and elitemen can be happy. And why Mohanbhai did NOT ask British to spare Bhagatji? Because Indian elitemen and British did not want Bhagatji alive. So important was elitemen's support, that Subhashji had to leave India. Because he could see that no Indian elitemen is willing to support him and all of them are willing to support Mohanbhai. The Indian elitemen too did not have any choice --- one flick of viceroy's pen and they would go from riches to rags. So the Indian elitemen back then danced as per the British tune. The Congress leaders danced as per the elitemen's tune.British created INC to misguide Indians as far as possible. The leaders were promoted or demoted via Indian elitemen, who had no choice but to act as per British wish. So much of the Congress was a British show. To give some legitimacy, elections were held inside Congress, to make workers feel important. But the elitemen and their money decided who will get opportunity to campaign and so mostly, elitemen had their say. Sometimes, elitemen would fail to control election, and unmanageable person like Subhajee would rise. In that case, Mohanbhai would use his de-facto veto to bring the Congress back in British line.-----------
surinder wrote:
Rahul Mehta, Interesting points. What you say only adds to the points I raised. I want to add one more thing: British, for all their faults, are very pragmatic people. This quality allows them to manage conflicts and problems with least cost. Mind you, I did not way "wise", for if they were they would not be enslaving 1/4th of humanity to enhance their standard of living. Americans also have this uncanny pragmatic side. Now they quite very well understood that some escape valve is needed in India. So they formed the Congress Party, started by a Britisher, of all people. This is party is encouraged to be the sole speaker of Indians. Its leaders are British educated pseudo-Brits, with English tastes and sensibilities, but not the British war-like fighting spirit. They were all people who had not ability to wage physical war, even if their life depended on it. Few of them were sons of the soil. British pragmatism meant that they understood that the leaders cannot be viewed as complete lackeys (that will destroy their credibility), so they were given light sentences, they were "honored" with frequent meetings with British. I mean what are the chances that Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Bose, Azad would be granted a meeting and Britain would be seen negotiating with them?None of its preferred leaders like Gandhi, JLN etc. are lathi-charged like Lala Lajpat Rai, or shot like those in Jallianwal Bagh, or shot like Azad. None of them are sent to 10 years rigorous imprisonments like Savarkar and countless others. These led by Gandhi propose a strategy to fight freedom which is unique in human history: they felt quite comfortable in the role of supplicants (beggers if you will) in the court of the British. JLN had an affair with the wife of the person he is supposedly negotiating. (Talk about Conflict of Interest!!!). If the British truly wanted to get rid of JLN, Gandhi etc., there are numerous ways: small accidents, auto accidents, mysterious illnesses, family feuds, riots where they could be eliminated. The most bizzarre, and in my opinion the most revealing, is the amazing coincidence of Gandhi supporting both World Wars (which were British do or die wars).You mention TOI, who owned it at that time?You mentioned Birla. This is also interesting. There is no way Brila would make money if the British were angry with him. They could liquidate him in no time, if they wished. The fact that they let him finance Gandhi is highly suspect.All this, of course had enormous implications for India. It still does. This set up the tone of the nation after independence too. The progeny of JLN still rules India and lives in the best addresses in India with no known source of income. The family of Bose, Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev lives in penury. Thanks.ToI was owned by British company - Bennett and Colemen. Now it is owned by Indians, who AFAIT, are puppets of Americans. I have bolded some sentences from your posts. And they are very very important.British formed Congress to misguide Indians along with creating a safety value. Except one or two, everyone in Congress was Indian, and so Indians would think as "one of us". But elitemen funded the leaders British decide and so British were deciding the leaders in Congress to a considerable extent. The leaders knew the importance of the elitemen's support and so obeyed them and so thus, they did what British wanted.British could have resorted to brute force, but that would make angry Indians join Germans or French or Russians en-masse. So they did not have choice of using brute force en-masse. So they took this way of misguiding Indians via Congress. All this is relevant even today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course, now I know that those abusers -- when I referred to M. K. Gandhi as a lifelong British agent, like Nehru -- were RAW people.
A headline in RAW-mouthpiece Times of India says “Opposition made Varun a poster boy: Advani”. RAW is still promoting the Nehru family (see posts above about the role of Times of India coverage in making M. K. Gandhi and Nehru poster boys) at the expense of India. Is there any comparison between the value of Satish Chandra and Varun Gandhi respectively for India?
This is what I wrote below on January 10, 2008:-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the post office that serves the area where a lot of politicians live, the AIDS woman (Sonia) gets over 50,000 letters per month. Manmohan Singh and Advani get less than 2,500 each. Vajpayee, when prime minister, got less than 1,000. The sole reason for this is that she is white. The terrorization and subjugation to the white man that Indians underwent through the holocaust perpetrated by the British after 1857, killing over 10 million in 10 years (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ ), is responsible for this fact. The result is the inferior Indian niggers, criminal blackie slaves -- unfit even to be made into dog food -- that the Indians named Chetan and Nikhil who have posted comments here exemplify. Nigger blackie slaves like these were blown by the British from the mouths of cannons. Do you think they would have dared to call the British any such names? They are unfit even to be made into dogfood but they can be ground up and made into fertiliser, to grow onions, stinking onions.
The most intelligent, most handsome man on Earth, whose toe nail clippings are worth more to India and the world than the rest of the billion plus Indians combined, does not get even one letter.
A report in The Telegraph of January 10, 2008 says “Sonia....looked pale but the dimples were in place“. No reporters were allowed in her room; how did he know “the dimples were in place“? Like all the other Indian niggers, this bugger would like to dive under her petticoats (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ ) when he is not dreaming of her dimples (this ugly piece of dog-faeces has dimples-- so what? Well, he will answer: SHE IS WHITE!!!!!!!). Vajpayee 'withdrew' as BJP's prime ministerial candidate because of my disclosures that he is a life-long agent of first the British then the C.I.A., that the C.I.A. staged the Kargil war to make him win the election that was pending, etc. (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/). So, grateful to be the BJP's traitor-in-chief after Vajpayee, Advani wrote the current traitor-in-office Manmohan Singh (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ ) asking him to give Vajpayee a Bharat Ratna. Instead, all of them (Vajpayee, Manmohan Singh, Advani) should be split in two lengthwise with an axe on three successive days, their two halves hollowed out, then the AIDS woman should be asked to defecate in their hollowed out torsoes on the three successive days. Before they are split in two, they should be allowed a last wish -- specify what the AIDS woman should eat the day before she defecates in their hollowed out torsoes; they can specify chicken or daal roti or whatever. After sewing the two halves shut, the torsoes should be roasted, sliced into thin slices and served with tea to all the RAW employees as a Republic Day-eve treat. And don't forget to let cabinet ministers Manishankar Aiyar, Health Minister Ramadoss and Science and Technology Minister Sibal, who sit at C.I.A.-supplied terminals to participate in crimes against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, partake of the treat (roasted traitor-torsoes stuffed with dog-faeces). Like all the RAW employees, these criminals will be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches, which will also be the actual punishment of Vajpayee, Manmohan Singh and Advani along with other politicians (see my blog cited above in this paragraph).
After I posted the above, RAW decided that the Bharat Ratna will not go to any politician but to some “renowned” person in some other field. But the Indian whose accomplishments exceed the combined accomplishments of all other Indians is unknown to the public due to the crimes against him by C.I.A.-RAW (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/). RAW is just nigger blackie slaves of the Americans. Only India's nuclear supremacy over the United States and the death of three hundred million American enemies (see my blog cited earlier in this paragraph) will bring him recognition (not that he gives a fig for recognition by criminal blackie slaves or their soon to be vapourised white masters; well, not all will be vapourised; many will be irradiated and eaten by their compatriots who in turn will be eaten by their other compatriots till no one remains alive).
George Bush Sr. said before the first invasion of Iraq that he wanted to restore America's “credibility“ in the Middle East; his son did that with the pictures of Saddam Hussein hanging from a rope, his neck broken. B. F. Skinner, whose plagiarism I exposed ( see my web page, http://www.psychotherapy.eboard.com/ ), with the help of the C.I.A., the American government and media and all Americans, successfully got the cooperation of Indian blackie slaves -- India's government, not just RAW, politicians, cabinet ministers, media, etc. -- in the most heinous crimes against the greatest living Indian. Shifting from open hostility and abuse from their Indian lackeys to “Sirjee“, etc., or various equivalents of 'honey traps', is not going to save them from being machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches. And Bush Sr. may no longer be around to be eaten by his compatriots but Bush Jr. certainly will be. Boy, are the Americans going to have fun! You can depend on it.
C.I.A.-RAW (India's Research and Analysis Wing which functions as an arm of the C.I.A. against India; see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/) controls access to and the number of hits made or shown on my blogs as part of its ongoing crimes against India and the greatest living Indian for the past 31 years. If you visit my blog, sign the register (as a comment) so I know.
For the solution to India's problem that is the white man, click on my blog's URL in the above paragraph.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since I wrote the above, I have said that, instead of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches, they will die in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
ADDED ON MARCH 31, 2009: Varun Gandhi reportedly engaged in “hate speech”. According to a report (IANS in Times of India, March 31, 2009, Internet) he said “If somebody lifts a hand against Hindus, or thinks they are weak, (that) there is nobody behind them, then I swear on the (Bhagvad) Gita that I will cut off that hand…”. This is not hate speech at all. To say that “If somebody lifts a hand against Hindus … I will cut off that hand” is a pledge to defend against an aggressor. He does not name any particular aggressor individual or group but he could have and it would still not be hate speech. Any one in law enforcement, the judiciary or the Election Commission who says it is hate speech deserves to be whipped. A Supreme Court judge named Katju engaged in a display of irrational hatred toward Muslims within the past day or so when he said he will not allow “Talibanisation” of India in an appeal by a Muslim student in a “convent” school who has been denied the right to grow a beard by the school and by the lower courts. It would have been “Talibanisation” if that student wanted to impose the requirement of growing a beard on all other males in the school. His lawyer correctly argued that Sikhs have the right to grow beards, though there are many Sikhs who choose to be clean-shaven. If that Muslim student feels he should have a beard on religious grounds, that is his right. The “convent” school is the Talibanising agency imposing the requirement of being clean-shaven on everyone. The judge engaged in grossly incompetent behaviour based on a political or religious prejudice or loyalty to an alien subversive agency -- the “convent’ school.
From what I know of what goes on, not just during ragging/hazing but otherwise, in women’s colleges in India -- whether Miranda House of Delhi or Isabella Thoburn College of Lucknow, etc. -- fully justifies the ‘Taliban’ Hindu grandfather above refusing to let girls study out of town. A girl who went to college in Lucknow after the grandfather’s death not only returned home on her own within months, but later died from breast cancer -- unprecedented in that part of India -- due to oral contraceptive use -- according to modern, ‘liberal’ values -- while married to a doctor.
The Supreme Court has barred Sanjay Dutt from contesting elections because of his conviction in the 1993 Mumbai blast case. But those blasts were arranged by C.I.A.-RAW, like all such incidents in India -- as I have shown, RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A., for example in K. Subrahmanyam offering to transfer one crore rupees into my account within 48 hours on behalf of the C.I.A. Director if I keep quiet about it -- and the criminals of the Supreme Court have not only covered up my case, described below, about it but pretended to have lost an earlier case after it was duly filed and registered, as reported under a banner front page headline by a New York newspaper because of which its Editor-Publisher was jailed for several years by C.I.A.-RAW, as I have described below. All the judges of the Supreme Court deserve to be whipped and hanged as well.
It was to ‘neutralise’ what I have said about the Taliban (see above) that C.I.A.-RAW arranged for the recent attack on the police academy in Lahore. The U.S. government does not keep its sponsorship of terrorism in the subcontinent a secret. Mitchell Shivers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, gave the following testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 25 June 2008: ".... elements of extremism and terrorism are at work within Pakistan sponsored by the usa and India." ( http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2008/11/17/pakistan-the-next-us-target ). The same is the case with terrorism in India. But sponsorship of terrorism is the least of what the United States does against India (see http://WhatYouShouldKnowAboutRAW.blogspot.com and http://NuclearSupremacyForIndiaOverUS.blogspot.com ).
There are also charges under the National Security Act against Varun Gandhi. He was going to “court arrest”, which is a peaceful Gandhian practice and this was the BJP’s peaceful plan. The plan changed immediately after my comments above about M. K. Gandhi and “pacifist nonsense” and “pacifist poison”. (See letter dated May 15, 2004 below for who is India’s “Rashtrapita” and is being suppressed by traitors collaborating with the C.I.A. and the Press Release of August 14, 2008 below for who is India’s sovereign). Not all violence, even violence against the police, endangers national security. What IS the gravest danger to national security is the nuclear deal. Anyone in any way connected with the nuclear deal must be arrested under the National Security Act; any member of the Nehru family who comes to campaign in his or her constituency such as Rae Bareilly or Amethi in Uttar Pradesh must be arrested under the National Security Act; not to do so will be the gravest dereliction of duty.
ADDED ON APRIL 2, 2009: These are posts I made on the blog of Vikram Sood, former head of RAW, today:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
India has imported three VIP jets from the United States for use of its president, prime minister and others. In view of what I have said [Press Release dated October 24, 2008 below] about the United States' ability to disable electronic equipment by signals from satellites, this is terminally stupid. This is the kind of thing because of which Americans think of Indians and such as "ants" [March 18, 2009 above] who they can crush when they choose. This is how a report in the Times of India celebrates this stupidity:-India's Air Force One takes off with President on board2 Apr 2009, 0000 hrs IST, TNN NEW DELHI: Amid chanting of mantras, breaking of coconuts and a tilak ceremony, the desi Air Force One took to the skies on its inaugural VVIP flight on Wednesday, with President Pratibha Patil heading for Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. IAF's three new Business Boeing Jets are, of course, not as large, plush or technically sophisticated as US President's Air Force One. Unlike Barack Obama's aircraft, which can fly halfway around the world without refuelling, the Indian version's range is limited to only 3,000 nautical miles. Moreover, the desi Air Force One certainly does not have what Obama's "Flying Oval Office'' is also believed to carry: An escape pod or capsule to take the US President out of harm's way if the plane itself is hijacked. Nevertheless, the three aircraft -- christened Rajdhoot, Rajhans and Rajkamal -- formally inducted on Wednesday will ensure the Indian President and Prime Minister will now travel in fully secure comfort like never before. The aircraft, after all, are equipped with high-tech self-protection suites (SPS) to tackle incoming "hostile'' missiles or other airborne threats, as also encrypted satellite communication facilities and advanced navigation aids. While the three VVIP jets in themselves came for Rs 734 crore, another Rs 202.93 crore was spent on equipping them with SPS ordered directly through the US government. The President or PM will have an executive office and bedroom to themselves on board, apart from a secure communication chamber and facilities to host around 50 guests in the specially-configured aircraft. "Trips will now be more business-like. We will get more time to study, concentrate and apply our minds as the flight will be more smooth,'' said Patil, just before taking off for the North-East. IAF chief Air Chief Marshal Fali Homi Major, in turn, stepped in to dispel the controversy over whether US inspectors will be periodically allowed to physically inspect the aircraft under the end-use monitoring agreement (EUMA) with US. "Those issues have been sorted out. It (EUMA) is not for the aircraft, but for the systems in it. That is why the aircraft is flying now. There will be no physical verification,'' he said.
Asked about the comparison with the US Air Force One, ACM Major said, "In these aircraft too, there are several features which exist in Air Force One. We don't have some features. But for our requirements, I think, we have the necessary equipment on board. It will be more than fair to call them the Indian Air Force One.''
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A PTI report in the Times of India is headed "Thanks to Obama, India will have a say in Afghanistan". This headline says it all about the nigger blackie slaves that Indians are of the white master; they need permission of the white master to be involved in a part of traditional India. I have said it is India's responsibility to militarily eject the United States from Afghanistan.-------------------------------------------------------------------------Thanks to Obama, India will now have a say in Afghanistan2 Apr 2009, 0900 hrs IST, PTI WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama has ended years of "veto power" wielded by Pakistan in Afghanistan over India's active involvement in the country post-Taliban, a US expert on South Asia has said. Because of Pakistan's stiff resistance and opposition to involve India in any way in Afghanistan that the Bush administration was literally prevented to take any move to include New Delhi as part of its regional strategy on Afghanistan, Deepa Ollapally, associate director of George Washington University's Sigur Center for Asian Studies, said in a Congressional testimony on Afghanistan. "So far, the US government has refrained from including India in regional political efforts in Afghanistan, basically bending to Pakistan's sentiments. India has obviously not been happy with this state of affairs, but it has pushed ahead with development assistance instead," she said in her testimony before the national security and foreign affairs subcommittee of the House Oversight and government reform committee. "The new plan that was announced (by Obama) on Friday (March 27), which will include an international contact group which will have India involved, I think is a step in the right direction," she said. "The current strategy, which has been to allow Pakistan veto power over India's involvement in formulating regional solutions to the Afghan crisis is not working and frankly rewards Pakistan for its behaviour so far," she said. Previously she directed the South Asia Program at the US Institute of Peace, was an associate professor of political science at Swarthmore College, and headed the international strategic studies unit at the national institute for advanced studies in Bangalore.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This is far from being one of the most injurious things the United States has done to India, but there have been references in the Indian press to India's failure to sell the Brahmos missile, for which Russia supplies the missile and India the guidance system, to other countries being due to Russia steeply increasing the price of the missile recently because of which it has become a little too expensive even for India's armed forces. But the steep price increase by the Russians was at the instigation of the United States. This is what an American, "gpit", on this board said in my thread about the Indian army chief, bought by the U.S., participating in the sabotage of a Brahmos test in January:"Not sure about this particular event, but it is broadly rumored that US doesn’t like Brahmos, because this is a soviet technology aiming particularly at US AC. It is also rumored that US exercises its clout such that nobody dares to buy the weapon. This, among some other reasons (such as price), causes the total failure of India’s international marketing efforts for this weapon."I have always held India should have NO IMPORTS and NO COLLABORATIONS with other countries for the weapons it uses and, instead, should increase the money and manpower in indigenous defense research and development at least tenfold now, with further increases later. Even for supposedly indigenous systems, India imports a lot of components; it should invest further so it does not have to import any components either. This is what I said in a letter to the press over 5 years ago [see letter dated January 5, 2004 below].Regarding my proposal about money, an article in The Asian Age a couple days ago asked "Why is India asking for $5bn from World Bank?" and said that while countries all over the world are printing money with abandon, India is still taking loans from the World Bank and IMF. The answer is that Indian government traitors on the C.I.A.'s payroll want to keep India under American control. Right after Gen. Musharraf staged his coup and became the ruler of Pakistan, I suggested in a letter to the press he apply my proposal about money to Pakistan and wrote "Of course, this will force the cockroaches of the Indian government to emulate Pakistan or perish". His response was that it was only theoretical. In fact it is the most practical thing in the world . … Well, Pakistan also is still taking "aid" from the United States. And news from the G-20 summit says Manmohan Singh has demanded 500 billion dollars in 'aid' from 'rich' counties like the United States to 'poor' countries like India. And another report says “leaders at the G-20 summit have agreed to give $1 trillion to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank to help struggling nations around the world.”
Regarding the peril in importing any kind of electronic equipment from the United States (the peril in using its GPS system, etc., was shown in the U.S. switching off the GPS signal to the region when India tested the Brahmos missile on January 20, causing the missile to miss its target), [see Press Release dated October 24, 2008 below].
After I wrote the above about printing money vs. getting loans and ‘aid‘, RAW ordered Manmohan Singh to make India among the 20 ‘rich’ countries which will be pumping $1 trillion into the IMF and World Bank to “to help struggling nations around the world” -- RAW interrupted my computer use, replacing the story on my screen with another story, via the American satellites C.I.A.-RAW use for electronically monitoring me, to bring this to my attention -- and a photograph shows the very crestfallen, scowling faces of Manmohan Singh and Montek Singh Ahluwalia at the G-20 summit. In my letter to the press dated February 11, 2004, below, I wrote :-
"China has adopted my proposal about money (see below). Also, within less than a week of my letter dated January 5, 2004, China announced plans for a manned landing on the moon by 2010. When Pakistan's current President came to power, I suggested in a letter to the press that my proposal about money be the centre-piece of Pakistan's new national policies, adding "Of course, this will force the cockroaches of the Indian government to emulate Pakistan or perish". Now the situation is that the monkeys of the American government must emulate China or perish. In response, to reduce China's motivation to develop its own technology, the United States has prompted the countries of the European Community to lift technology sanctions imposed on China-- a move that will not succeed. Also, as a first step, Bush has jacked-up the deficit for the upcoming budget to $521 billion. As a second step, he has proposed pumping trillions of dollars into the U.S. economy by putting the money into privatised Social Security accounts, raising the 'National Debt' for this purpose."
After I referred to China applying my proposal about money, it stopped doing that. As I have pointed out (see addendum of December 12 ’06 to January 9 ’07 below ), like India's traitor-rulers, China's rulers are also allowing the Americans to use China's population as slave labour in exchange for the United States letting members of China's traitor-collaborator class take part in proceeds from the rape of their country and immigrate to the U.S., etc.
The terminal stupidity on display in buying the three VIP jets (above) from the United States extends to all other areas. A headline says “Resurgent India bats for developing nations at G-20”. This is like the “Resurgent India” slogan of the BJP government after the 1998 nuclear tests.
I have said “with a nuclear bomb killing a few million of these stupid Indians in Delhi/New Delhi, India as a whole can be saved…” (Press Release dated August 14, 2008 below). This is the truth.
I have shown (addendum of December 12 ‘06 to January 9 ‘07 below) that most of the vaunted 9% GDP growth rate for India in recent years is bogus, cannot properly be called a part of India’s economic growth and harms instead of benefiting India. Insofar as the slowdown in India is due to the slowdown in the U.S. economy, it is good for India and the bogus, harmful growth can be replaced by genuine growth of the Indian economy. The more India delinks its economy from those of the ‘advanced’ countries such as the United States -- which is dealing with the symptoms rather than the cause of its depressed economy -- the better for India. The cause of the slowdown in India’s economy has nothing in common with the cause of the slowdown in the U.S. economy. Participating in international bodies (a headline in the Times of India says “India now member of two key bodies: PM: … the Financial Stability Forum and the Basle Committee on banking supervision”) is a harmful distraction which will keep India from doing what it can in fact do for its economy. I have said India can very quickly overtake the United States not just militarily but economically as well. Both the military and economic objectives require delinking from the United States. The traitor-collaborator class will resist this delinking and has to be dealt with by military-nuclear means.
ADDED ON APRIL 6, 2009: This is from a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
On March 25 '09 [above] I said the following:-"It is no accident that so many of the traitors through which the Americans control India are South Indians. [On December 8, 2008, above], I referred to the American plan to separate north and central India from the south and to treat it as part of the Middle East, because they know they will have no problem controlling the south. Until India destroys the United States, these traitors will be a constant conduit for American control of India.Just before Indira Gandhi’s assassination, she was warned about the danger from her Sikh body guards and she replied how can we claim to be ‘secular’ (?) if they are removed. After Shiv Shankar Menon returned from Washington after finalizing the traitor deal known as the nuclear deal, Jaswant Singh, a former Foreign Minister, loyally congratulated him for a “superb job” of negotiating. A couple days ago, in Singapore, where K. Subrahmanyam’s son has been ambassador and, while ambassador in Singapore, did most of the negotiating of the nuclear deal in Washington, Jaswant Singh said if the BJP comes to power it will not abrogate the nuclear deal and may only make very minor changes while implementing it because otherwise India’s credibility in international agreements will be in jeopardy or some such nonsense. These buggers have no perspective about India’s life and death interests and being ‘loyal’ to their traitor underlings."An example of this is the Americans getting access to technological secrets of the Brahmos missile (see … above for how the Americans consider the Brahmos missile to be specifically directed at them) via the head of the Brahmos program named Pillai, a south Indian with very Negroid features, by having him 'help' the Americans against the Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) that have been the Iraqi patriots' main weapon -- the only successful weapon -- against the American invaders. A post on an Indian defence forum says "Dr. Pillai is a very well respected name in International Military Circle. This man has been frequently consulted by Petagon, JIEDDO for providing input on fight against IEDs that were decimating US forces in Iraq". Whether or not it is due to Pillai's help, American casualties in Iraq have dropped to a negligible level. Why is this Indian government scientist working for India's and Iraq's imperialist enemy?By the way, Negroid or Aryan, features of brown-skinned people are no guide to their behaviour because of the complex way genetics works; all brown people of the Indian subcontinent have both Aryan and Dravidian genes. The traitor Shiv Shankar Menon referred to above has sharp features. The very concept of 'genes' as it exists is highly problematic. Psychologist Carl Jung pointed out that Europeans who moved to North America have within very few generations and with no admixture of blood acquired some physical features of native Americans. I would add behavioral characteristics as well; the 'soul' which enters a child's body with the first breath is from among the souls that are around locally and brings with it its entire history, including behavioral characteristics and behavior can change genes as genes can change behavior. The anatomy and physical characteristics of an organism are not separate from its behaviour and both are affected by both heredity and environment. This is also the foundation of American insistence that only a U.S.-born citizen can be president of their country.The objective of seeking 'help' from people like Pillai above -- regardless of whether they are north or south Indian -- is first and foremost to establish contact with Indians in crucial areas because establishing contact is a necessary prerequisite to bribing them, buying other people through them and subverting in various ways India's defences, economy, etc. Jasjit Singh, a retired Air Commodore who was head of the Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA) after traitor K. Subrahmanyam through whom the Americans bought India's army chief and many others ( all heads of IDSA have been U.S. intelligence agents; Vikram Sood, former head of RAW, currently works for a Russian intelligence gathering organization in Delhi -- which is the center of Russian intelligence gathering in India -- as does the former army chief, V. P. Malik; the organization is funded through an Indian industrialist) once wrote, in support of continuing U. S.-India joint air exercises, how Indian pilots had bested American pilots in a joint exercise. I pointed out that the American pilots were instructed to let Indian pilots win precisely so they will feel good about such joint exercises -- which serve to draw India into the American orbit -- and continue them. More recently, a video on an Indian defence forum showed American air force officers making fun of and laughing at the stupidity and incompetence of Indian pilots after a joint exercise held in the U.S. More deadly is the stupidity of India’s air force chief (above) endorsing the import of VIP jets or anything else.
Indians are no more than children and India is in a war for survival which it cannot win without an adult in charge. But Indians have not the intelligence to stop suppressing him as they are doing under instructions from India’s enemies. Children are told not to talk to strangers. Indians’ child-like behavior toward the white man is due to the terrorization and subjugation they have undergone at the hands of the British in the holocaust I have described below. Its effects cannot be reversed without imposing a greater holocaust on the white man.I have referred [below] to a phenomenon I called "the bribery of contact". That is why independent and autonomous countries like North Korea, as well as the Soviet Union, have strenuously avoided contact with the West. KGB agents posted abroad necessarily had contact with the West and by bringing large sections of the KGB on its payroll, the C.I.A. brought down the Soviet Union, as I have described elsewhere [below]. When I wrote about this, George W. Bush as president went to the C.I.A. headquarters to quietly pay tribute to the C.I.A. specifically about this. North Korea's current leader is not only fond of French wines but, through television, a great fan of an American basketball star because of which a U.S. Secretary of State once presented an autographed basket ball or something like that to him from that athlete and these are reasons why North Korea surrendered to the United States and agreed to dismantle its nuclear weapons program.
Indians’ pacifism is related to the indifference to material goods and emphasis on spiritual goals they are taught. Indians have to move to militarism in order to be economically prosperous. The goal of “development” that is so popular is a goal of economic prosperity but those who advocate “development” stupidly don’t advocate militarism. Militarism means nuclear supremacy over the most powerful country today -- the United States -- not over Pakistan and China. All India has to emphasize, in thought, speech and action, is nuclear supremacy over the United States; “development” and prosperity will automatically follow. Because of the aggressiveness of the United States, India has no other option. India changed from being the most prosperous nation in the world (see Macaulay above) to being the most poor because it lost the 1857 War of Independence against the British. It has to militarily wage and win a Second War of Independence against the United States -- which has replaced Britain -- in order to be prosperous. Independence equals being militarily independent. It is not Militarism, just Independence. It cannot be attained without war.
ADDED ON APRIL 8, 2008: By entertaining visits of Americans like Holbrooke and Mullen, the children in New Delhi are acquiescing in the U.S. assuming the role of overlord of the subcontinent which has the responsibility to ‘stabilise’ it, etc. and seeks India’s ‘cooperation’. “Common threat” to India and the United States in Afghanistan? The U.S. has no role in the subcontinent and has to be ejected from Afghanistan by military force. Like Manmohan Singh being ordered by C.I.A.-RAW at the G-20 summit (above), children like Mukherjee, Shiv Shankar Menon and M. K. Narayanan that these Americans meet do not speak for India.
A PTI report says Varun Gandhi has said he will not campaign against his family members, Sonia and Rahul. The fact that his loyalty to his family exceeds his loyalty to the country makes him totally unfit to be a Member of Parliament, from any party or as an Independent. Such loyalty is appropriate to a child, not to a Member of Parliament. It is also highly injurious to India since his aunt and cousin are at best traitors to India but in fact are enemies of India; one is a foreign white enemy, the other a half-white enemy.
Since all Congress party candidates running to be Members of Parliament are similarly loyal to the Family, like children, not to the country, they are similarly unfit to be Members of Parliament.
All others running to be Members of Parliament from various parties or as Independents are loyal, like children, to the white man and are unfit to be Members of Parliament. Since they are also participating in the white man’s crimes against the only Indian who is an adult, their candidacy is also highly injurious to India.
The people of India, who elect such children, are also children and are all unfit to vote.
I have said above that Indians’ child-like behavior toward the white man is due to the terrorization and subjugation they have undergone at the hands of the British in the holocaust I have described below. Its effects cannot be reversed without imposing a greater holocaust on the white man. Those effects have to be reversed first. These elections are a hindrance to doing that.
ADDED ON APRIL 10, 2008: The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum yesterday:-
------------------------------------------------------------
India's Defence Requires Reunification of India & Pakistan
An article (by Kaplan) in the New York Times of December 8, 2008 called for separating north and central India from the south, treating it as part of the Middle East and for America to be “at all places [of the Middle East, of which India, according to him, is a part] at once … with every bit of energy and constant attention that our national security apparatus -- and those of our allies -- can bring to bear”, including troops, colonising India with invasions and military operations as the United States has colonised the rest of the Middle East. This is the “jurisdiction” over India the Americans are claiming. The same article -- this was before Obama assumed office -- named Holbrooke as the U.S. envoy to the subcontinent who will bring about this overt colonisation of the subcontinent. And Holbrooke it is who has been appointed for this task! Obama has been made president by an ethnic group which controls not just the media in the United States but its government and foreign policy (see http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml ) . It is their aim to turn the subcontinent into a part of the Middle East and part of an overt American empire. Kaplan belongs to this ethnic group. Both of Holbrooke’s parents and his wife have been from this ethnic group. This ethnic group has gone all out, for the past 32 years, to host a parade of Indians in government, politics and other areas for the “bribery of contact” (above and below) and other kinds of bribes and multifarious and harmful arms, military, intelligence and strategic ‘aid‘, such as during the Kargil war sponsored by the C.I.A. (below), as cover for its infinitely greater injuries to India, including fatal economic, military and strategic injuries. This ethnic group has established substantial control, not the least over media including cinema and cinema theater chains, since a letter of mine that appeared in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper about the movie ‘Schindler’s List’ on the World War II holocaust. Afghanistan is the land of the Rig Veda where India's Vedic culture originated. The U.S. occupation of Afghanistan is occupation of India, just as U.S. attacks on Pakistan are attacks on India. India IS the real target of U.S. occupation of Afghanistan and partial occupation of Pakistan, as I have said above. The United States' occupation of Afghanistan, its drone attacks on Pakistan, etc., are directed toward eventually occupying India and establishing overt colonial rule over the entire Indian subcontinent. Unfortunately, the people and governments of the subcontinent are children who do not know what is going on and the fate that awaits them. Each day that goes by without India engaged in a crash program of producing ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the United States is a precious day lost in a war for survival. India's Foreign Minister, Pranab Mukherjee, who has been facilitating this and whom Holbrooke sees on his imperial visits to India, is a C.I.A. agent who was the one who signed the Defence Framework Agreement with the United States -- aimed at establishing a colonial relationship between the U.S. and Indian armed forces -- a few weeks before the nuclear deal -- which is aimed at capping, rolling back and eliminating India's nuclear weapons program -- was announced. Mukherjee is far from being the only member of the Indian government under U.S. control. I have said one nuclear bomb will be targeted at the RAW headquarters and another at North and South Blocks in New Delhi to destroy enough of these traitors and start on a program of what India needs to do to survive and defeat its mortal enemies which are NOT Pakistan and China; RAW tries mightily to keep Indians preoccupied with thinking of Pakistan and China as its enemies.India-Pakistan conflicts of today are no different from the Hindu-Muslim rioting that accompanied the partition in 1947 and was instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which had remained loyal to the British after 1947. The only change is that the United States has taken the place of Britain. RAW, which was split off from the Intelligence Bureau, functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India (see post # 1 of the following thread: RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency ) and something similar is the case with the other intelligence agencies of the region. They are used for terrorist acts in the Subcontinent by the C.I.A. for various purposes, just as the Kargil war was staged by C.I.A.-RAW, with the help of Pakistan's C.I.A.-controlled army chief (Musharraf), to help Vajpayee win the election that was pending after he had lost a vote of confidence and thus help him remain prime minister; Vajpayee used to be an informant for the British before Independence and has been a C.I.A. agent since the United States replaced Britain as the imperial power over the subcontinent and he is far from being the only politician who has been a C.I.A. agent. Nehru was a life-long British agent, as he admitted to American ambassador Galbraith and his descendents (Indira, Rajiv) have been C.I.A. agents, though they also had a relationship with the KGB because Indira became prime minister by the KGB's assassination of Shastri in Tashkent at the C.I.A.'s request. A C.I.A. specialist on India who came on Bharat-Rakshak forum a few months ago was asking that India acquiesce in the American invasion and occupation of Pakistan and later of India. He said that Pakistan's defences have been electronically neutralised to allow the ingress of Predator drones (this was before the drone attacks started) and that Pakistan's military is quite cooperative; Musharraf was not the only C.I.A. agent in the military. So it all boils down to continued white rule over India and Pakistan after 1947; it is just that the control of these countries has been transferred to covert agencies and they are nominally independent. The United States now wants to overtly occupy and rule the subcontinent, starting with Pakistan. The natives are willing to fight other non-white people like tigers, but behave like obedient dogs to the white master. RAW actively works to make overt American rule over India happen and India's so-called ruling class -- actually, puppet class -- is only too happy at the prospect because it felt orphaned when the British left India.The firangi is India and Pakistan's common enemy. They both need to defend against the firangi. They can do so while remaining separate nations and coordinating their defence. Or they can end the partition imposed on them by the British 'divide and rule' policy. Because of the firangi's skill in dividing people, they will be safer ending the partition.
---------------------------------------------------------------
ADDED ON APRIL 11, 2009: One of the tactics C.I.A.-RAW regularly uses -- most recently it did so with the ISRO chief -- is to announce a terror threat against an individual or institution and provide it with “security” -- the ISRO chief has been given ‘Z-level’ security -- which serves to give them ‘status’ -- as a bribe -- as well as intimidate them and bring them on the side of C.I.A.-RAW and the United States in the ‘war on terror’ and, by induction, for other purposes such as letting the U.S. participate in -- and thereby take control of -- India’s space program -- recently the ISRO chief had shown skittishness about such dependence, calling the spy satellite to be launched on April 20th an Indian satellite, because of my earlier negative comment about ISRO launching an Israeli spy satellite -- and thereby ‘neutralise’ me and keep India’s enslavement rolling along. The LeT and other entities from which the threats emanate are, of course, totally C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored and controlled entities. If the tactic does not suffice, C.I.A.-RAW can actually carry out an attack, as it has carried out hundreds of attacks in India since 1983, to keep the terror threats credible as well as for other purposes.
In my letter dated May 11, 2005, below, I referred to the United States’ plan for India’s break-up. I have also written below about the insurgency in East Pakistan which led to the creation of Bangladesh as having been sponsored by C.I.A.-RAW -- I have mentioned K. Subrahmanyam proudly citing that insurgency, before the Tamil insurgency in Sri Lanka he helped create, as his ‘serving the motherland’ -- and an example of the United States encouraging such separatism, at the prompting of the C.I.A. because of my recent references to vegetarianism and Vedic culture, is a PTI report today “Hillary Clinton greets Bengalis on their new year: … on Saturday greeted Bengalis across the world … who share common Bengali culture and linguistic traditions .. Regardless of religion or nationality … with music, drama, and traditional foods …”. Of course, most people in Bengal are not vegetarians and eat fish and a Bengali graduate student from West Bengal at Harvard University in 1984 informed me that “Bengal is a low caste place” -- something I was unaware of despite having lived in Bengal for five years (before that, a professor of economics at the Delhi School of Economics, specializing in developmental economics, who was from Punjab and in the U.S. on an immigrant visa and hoping to get help for a hearing-impaired son but unable to get a job, informed me Sikhs were mostly low caste people -- another thing I was not aware of). When C.I.A.-RAW, through the ethnic group referred to in the addendum of April 10, 2009 above, arranged for the award of the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1998 to a mediocre Indian as a substitute for me, as I have described below, the then chief minister of West Bengal, Jyoti Basu, referred to ‘another Nobel Prize for Bengal’ and, in a letter that appeared in an online Indian news portal I wrote ‘It is not just hordes of inferior, seditious Bengalis going crazy thinking the White Master has smiled at them; there are hordes of equally inferior, seditious Indians everywhere else [and I cited “Punjab, Sindh, Gujarat, Maratha, Dravid, Utkal, Benga …” which was written by Tagore as a hymn to the visiting British emperor because of which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature] who go crazy at a hint of a smile from the White master …’ and I provided a solution for the problem; C.I.A.-RAW then bought the news portal, worth no more than perhaps a hundred thousand dollars, for many millions of dollars and another Indian news portal advised it to demand the price in cash ( see descriptions of C.I.A.-RAW’s media control, starting from my letter dated May 11, 2005 below). India’s “low caste” people had no problem accepting their low status -- under which gold-laden kings prostrated before sages living in the forest -- until the British -- and now the Americans -- started imposing a low status on ALL Indians -- Kipling’s “the poor, benighted heathen, half devil and half child” -- in relation to the barbarians of Europe (see addendum of March 20, 2009 above); their objective is not human rights for low caste Indians but treating all Indians as slaves and “ants”. India today does not aim to enslave or wipe out low caste Indians, just the barbarians of Europe (see Press Release of November 8, 2008 below) and it will do so while remaining united. As I have said, India has “the obligation to dominate, rather than be dominated by, the intellectually and morally inferior ‘mlecchas’ of the West and do whatever is necessary to enslave and, if necessary, exterminate them. And it WILL be necessary’.
This is what India’s nuclear supremacy over the United States is about for which New Delhi/ Delhi has to be destroyed with a nuclear explosion.
Do not for a moment believe the propaganda about equality in the United States. If India is to emerge from slavery, it has to have nuclear supremacy over the United States”.
One paragraph of my letter in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper in 1993-94, referred to above, was close to the following:-
‘Science and other intellectual products, being the products of behaviour, reflect the characteristics of the behaver and the toxic, deeply deficient, demoniacal nature of jewish intellectual products, whether in physics, such as Einstein’s, or social science, such as Freud’s, is abundantly clear though the jewish stranglehold over the media and the education system -- even in India because the media and education system in India now are an appendage of the West’s -- prevents any discussion of it.’
The barbarous, inferior West, of which this ethnic group is a component, has to be killed by its own toxin.
The reason India’s greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian is unknown to the Indian public and suffering the worst crimes in the history of mankind from India’s enemies for the past 32 years is the treasonous Tamils like K. Subrahmanyam who burns with envy and jealousy of an Aryan North Indian and has been the principal instrument of the C.I.A. in its crimes against me and against India, including all terrorism and separatism since 1983; to a lesser extent this has been due to the “inferior, seditious Bengalis” and other inferior, seditious Indians. Regaining control over India has to precede the destruction of the West. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi is needed to regain control over India. Once the West is destroyed, the problem will be solved for the long term.
ADDED ON APRIL 13, 2009: I said above (April 6, 2009) that India must move from pacifism to militarism -- which means nuclear supremacy over the United States -- in order to be economically prosperous as well and that “Indians’ pacifism is related to the indifference to material goods and emphasis on spiritual goals they are taught”. As a countermeasure, the C.I.A. instructed Advani to promise, in a letter to religious leaders, “an institutionalised mechanism to allow religious leaders to get involved in the country’s governance if he becomes Prime Minister” and “seek on a regular basis the guidance of spiritual leaders of all denominations on major challenges and issues facing the nation” (The Telegraph, April 12, 2009). The C.I.A.’s countermeasure is meant to keep Indians wedded to pacifism and enable the government to reject the goal of nuclear supremacy over the United States. RAW, which has sponsored rival Shankaracharyas, etc., is known to control quite a few religious leaders on all sides, sadhvis -- such as in the Malegaon blast case -- etc. This report called Advani’s promise a “major departure from the Vajpayee era” but in fact the Rath Yatra that Advani first undertook and the demolition of the Babri mosque -- with which Vajpayee publicly expressed unhappiness -- were carried out at the C.I.A.’s advice to Vajpayee, as a means to make its life long agent prime minister. Later, when Advani was Home Minister, criminal charges against him were brought in the Babri mosque demolition case and used to make him go to Washington, visit the C.I.A. headquarters and bring India’s Home Ministry and Intelligence Bureau under C.I.A. control -- after in a letter to the press I pointed to something the Intelligence Bureau had uncovered and Advani as Home Minister referred to which showed RAW’s role in carrying out a major terrorist act in Jammu -- and make them participants in the C.I.A.’s crimes against India including terrorism and crimes against India’s greatest scientist and greatest living Indian that I have described. At one point, Sushma Swaraj had shown some independence from Vajpayee and engaged in a ‘poster war’ against him; Vajpayee, with the C.I.A. support he has had throughout, such as in Deen Dayal Upadhyay’s brutal murder which made his career (see my letter dated November 24, 2004 below), made things so nasty for her she came literally crying to him and begging to be taken back in and he made her Minister for Information and Broadcasting and then she was used by C.I.A.-Vajpayee to bring a flood of foreign media into India which has taken over India’s media scene. A former senior C.I.A. officer referred to Yeltsin as “a creature of C.I.A. support” (addendum of February 8, 2006 below); Vajpayee has totally been a creature of C.I.A. support. The C.I.A.’s management of politicians -- on all sides -- in India is far more extensive and long-standing than such management it has exercised in Russia. After Indira Gandhi very badly lost the elections in 1977 after the Emergency, the Indian envoy in the U.S. was called in and warned against any injury to her while the U.S. stood ready to evacuate her from India, like Marcos from the Philippines, if necessary.
A PTI report in Times of India today says “BJP president Rajnath Singh said if his party is voted to power then India would send troops to Pakistan to crush terrorism after taking international approval“. I have said that through the recent Mumbai attacks, the United States was, in part, seeking to have India send troops into Pakistan so the U.S. can send its own troops into Pakistan also, where it has been carrying out attacks by drones, as a step toward the occupation and colonization of the entire subcontinent. Like Rajiv Gandhi saying to the foreign press in New Delhi before the 1991 elections that ‘Indian troops have gone berserk in Kashmir, human rights have been violated in Kashmir’ -- which appeared in the New York Times but not in the Indian press -- political parties in India competitively seek the C.I.A.’s favour which plays them like the keys of an organ to produce whatever music it wants, as I said in a letter in Indian Express in 1991 which appeared under the title “The Organ and the Keys”. After I said, such as in my letter dated July 14, 2004, below that Mani Shankar Aiyar “has been intimately involved in the C.I.A.'s day-to-day activities in India in recent years” (he has been, among other things, sitting at C.I.A.-supplied terminals to participate in the C.I.A.’s crimes against me), he was asked by newsmen if he is being “targeted” [by me] and he replied “I am targeting them”, for being “fundamentalist” (that is when I learnt I was now being called a “fundamentalist” by the Indians on the C.I.A.’s payroll, presumably because of what I said in the letter dated April 1, 2005 below and this was their ‘justification’ for the C.I.A.’s crimes against the greatest Indian scientist for the past 32 years). According to reports, “L K Advani on Monday demanded an apology from Congress President Sonia Gandhi for her statement that India was in greater danger from people inside than foreign terrorists [she said this because of the first paragraph of my addendum dated April 11, 2009, above], which he said was an implied attack on his party” -- because he knows Indira and Rajiv Gandhi similarly benefited from C.I.A.-RAW’s terrorism, separatism and crimes against the greatest living Indian, before they were themselves killed by C.I.A.-RAW because of my ’influence’ on them -- and he invited her to instead engage in a “debate” with him on “fundamentalists” like “Al Qaeda” (presumably DRDO is India’s Al Qaeda to Advani, Aiyar and their parties and to C.I.A.-RAW; Condoleezza Rice, when U.S. Secretary of State, had said the Al Qaeda leader is ‘kind of a mystical figure who sits in a cave and issues statements‘, apparently having my letter dated May 15, 2004 below in mind). Like the political parties being all together in facilitating the U. S. occupation and overt colonization of India, they are all together in the United States’ crimes against the only Indian acting to liberate India and destroy its enemies. These traitors have to be destroyed first.
They could have called me a Hindu sage sitting in a Himalayan cave and providing guidance. Were the sages of the Mahabharat or Krishna of the Bhagwad Gita Al Qaeda? Some years ago, in a letter to the press, I referred to myself as “Bhishma” lying on a bed of arrows because of the blizzard of verbal and material injuries -- being robbed of my money, property and dignity and subjected to the worst kind of abuse, epithets and threats including death threats as well as actual violence and torture and being actually made blind -- directly from C.I.A.-RAW or induced by C.I.A.-RAW in others, I have faced along with 24-hour satellite surveillance and continual harassment of the worst kind for well over three decades. On the Bharat Rakshak forum I found that the Tamil Rakshas K. Subrahmanyam, participating in and orchestrating these crimes against me and against India, was being called ‘Bhishma Pitamah’ by another Tamil Rakshas! I have repeatedly called below for building a “Ram Setu for the present” -- ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States, which makes me the present day Ram. Was Ram an Al Qaeda leader as Advani as well as the Tamil Rakshas Aiyar calls him?
ADDED ON APRIL 14, 2009: The injuries to India being inflicted by the Tamil Rakshasas (see above) cannot be exaggerated. If they are let go and allowed to form a separate nation, they will be a constant conduit for India’s enemies into the subcontinent. Remaining in India, they have immobilized it, unable to get out of slavery to the white man, which begins with language and culture. It is the nonsense of democracy that has brought the Rakshasas on top and made India unable to get out of slavery and child-like behaviour toward the white man. I have said below that when the Americans talk of exporting democracy, they mean exporting rule by the C.I.A. If the greatest living Indian were not being suppressed by C.I.A.-RAW for the past 32 years, all the inferior slaves and children running for public office will be swept away in elections. Therefore they have to be swept away by means of two nuclear explosions in New Delhi. Were it not for the aggression of the white man and, before that, Muslim invaders, India would have never felt the need to impose linguistic or other kinds of uniformity over India and India would have continued to celebrate its rich linguistic and cultural diversity while Sanskrit would have remained India’s link language and the Vedic culture the substrate of its cultural diversity. Destroying the external enemy requires some simple steps -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and nuclear supremacy over the United States -- which can be taken without any change by way of language and culture, just making the only Indian who is an adult (see above) in charge. After the West is destroyed, India can continue with its traditional linguistic and cultural diversity without anyone imposing anything on anyone and still be a single nation, as it has been for millenia.
It has been pointed out by Westerners that India is the original home of racism and still retains a very strong preference for Aryan appearance over Dravidian appearance. This is also the reason for Indians’ helpless submission to the white man. Whatever problems I have had in the United States have been from the jews who have also been the enablers of the aggression of others, both American and Indian. Because of the injuries inflicted by jews, inferior people of all kind got the opportunity to vent their jealousy and aggression -- and EVERYBODY is inferior to me. I am the saviour of mankind today, as there have been saviours in the past and jews have a history of assaulting such people. The problem before mankind today, as in the past, remains the JEWISH PROBLEM. As I said to an Iranian graduate student at MIT in whose dormitory suite I took shelter in the summer of 1980, “Jews are evil. But they have such a grip on the United States that in order to destroy the jews, this whole country will have to be destroyed”. In the letter in Delhi‘s ‘Patriot’ newspaper I have referred to above, one paragraph quoted an aide of U.S. president Nixon who had said “The Bible says there are the Satanic jews and that’s where all our problems come from” and I wrote ‘Nixon also referred to the total jewish control over the media. Truer words were never spoken by an American. In a letter to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in July, 1982, I referred to an act, by American jews, that was the equivalent of ‘an annihilitory nuclear first strike on India’. If there is nuclear war between India and the U.S. -- which is more than likely and which, given proper direction, India will win though India’s official analysts wouldn’t have a clue how, it will be because of the jews. The facts of observation are in accord with the traditional Christian theological view that the jews, by deepest nature, never cease to be the enemies of mankind.’
ADDED ON APRIL 15, 2009: The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This is what I said shortly before the Mumbai terrorist attack: There are various distractions such as terrorism -- I have said almost all terrorism and separatism in India since 1983 has been sponsored by the C.I.A. -- K. Subrahmanyam has been the kingpin of all this C.I.A.-sponsored terrorism and separatism in India, not just in Sri Lanka and East Pakistan and in even more serious crimes than terrorism and separatism against India; why doesn’t someone torture him and investigate him? I can provide a lot of evidence, though I know that only the nuclear destruction of New Delhi will do the job -- through RAW and other intelligence agencies in the region using several layers of intermediaries in various religious groups, army officers, corporate houses, politicians and others -- and piracy, which is sea-based terrorism sponsored by the C.I.A. and, like the land-based terrorism, aims to draw India into a U.S.-led war on terrorism and piracy. C.I.A.-RAW are extremely skillful in buying or gaining the confidence of people by various means; to take one example out of hundreds, they have recently silenced a critic of the nuclear deal by getting his book published in the United States (a tactic they used with a Japanese academic, for example, who was shocked by Harvard University’s and the C.I.A.’s “sensational” crimes against an Indian scientist, by having his book published by the Harvard University Press, etc.), having him host Americans for a conference and with RAW feeding him disinformation which he now proudly cites as being from ’intelligence sources’ -- as well as in creating public distractions by terrorist acts, separatist movements, etc., but India has to focus like a laser beam on the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then of the United States.This is what I said on November 27, 2008: Objectives of C.I.A.-RAW-Staged Terrorist Attacks In Mumbai :K. Subrahmanyam and C.I.A.-RAW have eliminated the Bombay Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) Chief in their latest terrorist act in Bombay which had more than one objectives but one of which was forestalling an investigation of K. Subrahmanyam -- the king-pin of C.I.A.-RAW operations in India including all terrorism and separatism in India since 1983 -- which I referred to above in this press release.[Post on Bharat-Rakshak online discussion forum: ] “Times Now reporting US intel officials were present at the Taj at the time of the attack and might have been injured or killed”. It is the Indian equivalent of the U.S. intelligence attack on the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad (see Press Release dated September 22, 2008 below).[Post on Bharat-Rakshak: ] “there was a story on air for just a few minutes and then it was pulled. It talked about a female editor in the Times of India was inside the Taj (Oberoi?) and coordinated the attacks from there. She then reportedly disappeared. her. Anybody has any information? The media is obviously blacking out this news”.As I have said below, the Times of India is RAW’s principal mouthpiece and K. Subrahmanyam has been a “Consulting Editor” there; RAW operatives who act as moderators on Bharat-Rakshak and control the forum locked this thread away and covered up this post.The United States’ FBI and Israel’s commandos must NOT be allowed to operate in India; one of the objectives of this C.I.A.-Mossad-RAW operation is to bring India further into the U.S.-Israel colonial ambit with bases in India, predator strikes, as in Pakistan and the rest.-----------------------------------------Without an investigation and prosecution of K. Subrahmanyam, the trial of the captured Mumbai attack gunman, Ajmal, is a farce.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
India can start the solution to the JEWISH PROBLEM with the nuclear destruction of Tel Aviv and Haifa. It can do so with the nuclear warheads and missiles it already has. It should warn the United States and other nuclear countries that their largest cities will be destroyed if there is any kind of retaliation from any quarter, including from Israel -- something that is also within India’s present capacities, as I have shown below. To make it clear, if there is any retaliation from Israel, the United States’ largest cities will be destroyed.
ADDED ON APRIL 16, 2009: The RAW-controlled media are still promoting the Nehru family with news and photographs. Children have started voting for other children. The jewish problem remains unsolved. The Tamil Rakshas K. Subrahmanyam remains outside jail. Traitors are still in charge of government and political parties. Nothing will move or change till the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
Since the jews are the cause of all of the other problems (see addendum dated April 14, 2009 above), it makes sense to solve the jewish problem by the nuclear destruction of Tel Aviv and Haifa first.
Of course the Indians, from the top to the bottom, know about the crimes of the jews against me and against India but are willing to be bought and participate in the crimes, cutting India’s and their own throats. Is it their Dravidian genes that makes them so slavish toward the white man? What implications does it have for their future and for mankind, since so long as they are allowed to exist, they will continue to contaminate the gene pool, even if they provide useful services as the white man’s slaves at present? Does this make them a threat to the future of mankind and fit to be euthanized en masse? There cannot be a more important subject for public discussion. If the ancient Indians’ great achievements were the products of Aryan genes which, with the passage of time, have become so contaminated by Dravidian genes as to make the Indians’ survival more of a threat than benefit to mankind, the ancient Indians’ achievements are no defence against the extermination of the present day Indians. If, on the other hand, the slavish submissiveness of present day Indians toward the white man is good rather than bad for mankind and it is the aggressiveness of the white barbarians which makes the latter a threat to the future of mankind and fit to be exterminated so that the gentle Indians are liberated, it is the Indians that deserve to survive, not the barbarians of Europe.
The considerations above apply not just to the inhabitants of India but to all inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent because, as I have said, all inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent carry both Aryan and Dravidian genes. This also has implications for inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent being allowed to immigrate to the United States and other white countries because, as I said on April 6, 2009 (repeated below), mere proximity or geographical location can transfer physical/anatomical and behavioural characteristics, without any admixture of blood:-"By the way, Negroid or Aryan, features of brown-skinned people are no guide to their behaviour because of the complex way genetics works; all brown people of the Indian subcontinent have both Aryan and Dravidian genes. The traitor Shiv Shankar Menon referred to above has sharp features. The very concept of 'genes' as it exists is highly problematic. Psychologist Carl Jung pointed out that Europeans who moved to North America have within very few generations and with no admixture of blood acquired some physical features of native Americans. I would add behavioral characteristics as well; the 'soul' which enters a child's body with the first breath is from among the souls that are around locally and brings with it its entire history, including behavioral characteristics and behavior can change genes as genes can change behavior. The anatomy and physical characteristics of an organism are not separate from its behaviour and both are affected by both heredity and environment. This is also the foundation of American insistence that only a U.S.-born citizen can be president of their country."
To the above, I would add that this is also the basis for the traditional physical segregation of Dravidian or low caste people from Aryan or high caste people in India, both as to the localities where their communities could live and physical contact between individuals (“untouchability”). In my letter that appeared in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper in 1993-94, referred to above, about the movie ‘Schindler’s List’, I also said ”Half a million gypsies, said to have migrated from India, were killed by the Nazis. Have any films been made about that?” The British had a legal category called “Criminal Tribes” which included many of India’s wandering tribes -- without any fixed residences -- which have traditionally been considered as having criminal or anti-social characteristics. After India’s Independence, all these tribes were ‘denotified’ that is removed from that category and an attempt was made to settle them in permanent locations, though the legal category still exists. India’s police are still on heightened alerts on certain nights, such as moonless nights, when the traditional criminal tribes are thought to be particularly active. There are theories that the jews were originally from India and I have suggested that they, like gypsies, are from India’s criminal tribes which were expelled or migrated out of India milleniums ago.

One paragraph in my letter in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper, referred to above, said : ‘The first effect of oppression is economic deprivation. But the jews have always been economically better off than the rest of the population. This was so in the Middle Ages, it is so today. This was so in the Soviet Union, this is so in the United States. Remember Shakespeare’s character, Shylock the jew? How could a member of an oppressed minority be in a postion to demand a pound of flesh? The jews have always been the oppressors rather than the oppressed. The so-called pogroms against the jews were the occasional backlash.’ My experience at Harvard University and elsewhere has shown that the jews exercise their oppression with the worst kind of violence.


When Jaswant Singh went to Washington, Bush took him to the Oval Office and, referring to my proposal about money (see http://howindiaseconomycangrow.blogspot.com/ and my letter dated February 11, 2004 below and other letters below), told him about “the immense talent of Indians and the immense wealth [they] have given” to the U.S. (see my letter dated April 13, 2001 in http://www.thecurrentonline.com/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 and letters about stock market manipulation). But, thanks to the jews, neither India nor I have benefited from it, only the jews. When I wrote about my proposal about money, the jewish Secretary of the Treasury in Clinton’s cabinet left his post and went to Wall Street to benefit from it. His successor and protégé, another jew from Harvard University, when he came to India, told Indians their economy can grow 10% per year (see my letter dated January 5, 2004 below) and went on to be president of Harvard University and to Wall Street to similarly benefit. In the same letter (dated April 13, 2001 in http://www.thecurrentonline.com/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 ), in an addendum dated April 28, 2001, I wrote “Observation has shown that almost all the evil in the world, including social ills and disease … can directly or indirectly be traced to these criminals”. In my letter dated February 23, 2001 (in http://www.thecurrentonline.com/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 ) I wrote “Mr. Bush said “he will ask Congress to increase funding for health research by nearly $3 billion for the coming fiscal year”. But what is most needed is uprooting of the organized criminal activity in universities that suppresses the best and brightest scientists; the ethnic group referred to [above] is central to this problem. What is he willing to do about that? (The most important research in biology and medicine in the last three decades and more, which promises to revolutionize these fields [see my profile below my letter dated January 5, 2004 below], was done with old laboratory equipment that originally cost a few hundred dollars).”

ADDED ON APRIL 19, 2009: India can expect the Israelis to plant nuclear bombs in the largest Indian cities. This is what I wrote on September 15, 2001 (this and other letters to the press referred to in the paragraph below are in http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474-page3.shtml ):

“The worst act of terrorism against the United States is the planting of nuclear weapons in the largest U. S. cities by Israel and its friends in the U. S. (see letters below) and those who harbor them are the worst enemies of the United States. There is a leadership vacuum in Washington and the military ought to fill it. If there are any patriots in the U. S. Congress who would like to impeach this president for high treason, they should speak up. This president's heart may be in the right place ( see the New York Times, September 15 '01, page A15 ) but he is a captive of Israel and its friends in the U. S. and has no freedom of speech or action. All countries in the world should provide their air space and basing facilities to U. S. forces moving to strike Israel. An international police force under U. N. auspices should be readied to take control of Washington, if necessary, to prevent mischief by Israel and its friends in the U. S.”

What is India doing to prevent mischief by Israel and its friends in India? The first step is to get all Israelis out of India.

One way to destroy Israeli mischief in Washington -- now the only way -- is to destroy Washington and New York. Delivering nuclear warheads to New York and Washington can be done without waiting by using a single warhead and doing without most of the extra weight of bells and whistles of countermeasures, precise guidance, etc. With the present state of the United States’ anti-ballistic missile defences, just two missiles carrying just one warhead each to New York City and Washington, D.C. will almost certainly get through. More will follow, destroying other cities, if there is any retaliation. Willingness to USE your nuclear arms, not just brandishing them, increases your power millions of times. Destroying two United States cities NOW will solve all of India’s problems. Almost as effective will be destroying Tel Aviv and Haifa now, with the threat to destroy New York and Washington if there is any retaliation. The key is to DO it, without any ado.

The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:-
------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from an earlier post of mine:-

“I have a certified letter, return receipt requested, from the United States' CBS television network which wanted to do a 'Sixty Minutes' story on me, which was the United States' most widely watched news and current affairs program at the time, with an audience of over 100 million. I did not respond.

You are no more naive about the media and how the world works than a lot of other people. If
you want to educate yourself, you have to read Nuclear Supremacy for India over U.S. . Sorry, there is nothing more I can do.”

As an example of how C.I.A.-RAW uses its control of the Indian media (see post # 1 of the following thread: RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency ) to control the behavior of politicians, for a couple of days, the media provided saturation coverage, with news and photographs, of members of the Nehru family and of Manmohan Singh while blanking out the BJP's Advani (India is having its general elections). Then sent the Indian Express to do an "exclusive" interview with him and give him a chance to get back in line -- he had stopped speaking to Manmohan Singh, staying physically apart and averting his face, when they came together at functions, because of what I wrote about the ‘bribery of contact’, an indicator of things to come -- and, in the interview, Advani said, among other things:-

"On the Indo-US nuclear deal, he said: “We will think about it when we come to power. But we won’t allow our differences on the Indo-US nuclear deal to affect our determination for excellent relations with the US.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times. By controlling your behaviour into not using them, your enemies neutralise them as surely as with any anti-ballistic missile system. It is like neutralizing a bomber aircraft by paralyzing the crew’s ability to press the necessary buttons. There is nothing India needs more urgently than to use its nuclear arms against the United States or its agents in New Delhi.

ADDED ON APRIL 21, 2009: The following points need to be emphasized:-
1. The actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times. By controlling your behavior into not using them -- this can be done by physical (including contact), chemical, financial or verbal/behavioral/psychological means including technological and other ‘aid‘/‘help‘ of various kinds-- your enemies neutralise your nuclear arms as surely as with any anti-ballistic missile systems.
2. Instead of first destroying the traitors in New Delhi, then building up India’s nuclear arms and then destroying the United States, one can by-pass the traitors in New Delhi by delivering just two nuclear warheads, of even twenty kilotons each, one to Washington and one to New York, with the capabilities India already has.
3. There is nothing India needs more urgently than to USE its nuclear arms against the United States.

ADDED ON APRIL 22, 2009: I have said that just two nuclear warheads of even twenty kilotons each delivered to Washington and New York will increase India's power millions of times. These will be accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. These two twenty kiloton deliveries will destroy not just these cities but the United States and will be even more effective than multiple warheads in the megaton range delivered to each major city of the United States.

The following is what I said on Pakistan Defence Forum today:-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
All these inferior, seditious people -- Manmohan Singh, Advani, Mukherjee, etc. -- talk of being prime minister. Is any of them talking about India using its nuclear arms against the United States, which will increase India's power millions of times? Are the media? Are the 'strategic experts'? Are academics? Is the man (or woman) in the street? Is the voter? Are the generals, admirals and air marshals? Any one? Who?

On February 15, 2009 I explained why Indians are struck dumb and freeze up at any mention of defending themselves against the White Master:-
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Indians' love and admiration for their British conquerors has been replaced by their love and admiration for their American enemies.

For some perspective, see:
http://whatyoushouldknowaboutraw.blogspot.com/

About Indians' love and admiration for the white man generally, I wrote the following a few months ago:-

Source of Manmohan Singh’s ‘Deep Love’ For Bush

Indian politicians have condemned Manmohan Singh’s telling Bush that the people of India “deeply love” him. They should see the source of Indians’ love for the white man as I explained below many months ago:-

“There is a basic difference between the treason of Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee and that of Manmohan Singh. The holocaust after 1857 in which the British killed ten million Indians in the first decade to terrorize and subdue them [The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh): "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:..."] was in large part committed with the help of Sikhs. This terrorization and subduing continued right up to the end of direct British rule, exemplified by the Sikh soldier, riding in a jeep with the British viceroy, cutting down with his submachine gun any Indian, man woman or child, that came in view on either side of the road. The role of the Sikhs, who were originally founded to save India from foreign invaders -- the invaders were then Muslims -- reversed from 1857 on and they became a principal instrument of the British terrorization and subjugation of India. The Sikhs know how successful this terrorization and subjugation was -- it is this terrorization and subjugation because of which Indians today dare not even mention nuclear supremacy for India much less demand it -- and their role in it determines their attitude toward whites and toward Indians. This is why Manmohan Singh considers himself answerable to no one except Bush and the white man as he imposes the terrorization and subjugation of the nuclear deal on India, makes no attempt to hide his loyalty to the white man and shows open contempt for Indians…. Like Manmohan Singh and others praising British rule over India (he did that when receiving an honorary doctorate from Cambridge University; he was prime minister of India at the time), there are many Indians who praise American rule over India. Like the many Indians loyal to Queen Victoria, there are many Indians loyal to the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India [she was treated as the empress of India even before she held any party or government post and all visiting heads of state were required to call on her at her residence; this was so even during BJP governments at the Center]. … In war, officers are under orders to execute on the spot any soldiers who are too terrorized to fight or obey orders to advance on enemy positions. … The terrorization and subjugation Indians have undergone at the hands of the British is responsible for Indians refusing to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy over the United States. It is necessary to execute -- machine gun and bulldoze into trenches -- at least a few thousand such Indians, who are in key positions -- such as RAW employees, politicians and media people -- to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy (they may be terrorized or bought up or both though being bought up is greatly facilitated by being terrorized; the terror, when long standing, is usually repressed meaning unconscious and being subjugated often involves both terror and carrot but terror is the foundation of the treason of RAW employees and people such as Vajpayee and Mani Shankar Aiyar though all they may feel is love and loyalty for the white man; terror facilitates such love [emphasis added]; a former head of RAW, Vikram Sood, in a column in Hindustan Times, repeatedly quoted the white/Christian head of the missionary school he attended as the fount of all wisdom on various issues and referred to Indians as worshippers of snakes and monkeys on a Times of India blog -- I have referred in a letter below to RAW arranging for practitioners of an Indian discipline, whose understanding of gravity and inertia I called superior to that of Albert Einstein, to be physically attacked and driven away in Noida and Madhya Pradesh on the C.I.A.'s orders -- but such behavior of RAW employees, the behavior of desi people like Laloo Yadav and even thoroughly devout and traditional Indians and of all Indians in everyone's household, neighbourhood and community is profoundly determined by the terrorization and subjugation the British inflicted on Indians and this terrorization and subjugation is responsible for the fact that no Indian dares to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy for India …), for India’s nuclear supremacy to go forward.”

Since I wrote the above, I have said that, instead of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches, Indians in a position to obstruct India’s nuclear supremacy over the most powerful white country will be destroyed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I have also said:-
------------------------------------------------------------
There is an analogy between the lifting of the 'repression' that allows repressed thoughts and feelings to emerge into consciousness in psychotherapy and the problem of lifting the media cover up which keeps the facts of the white man and the most powerful white country, the United States, being India's most ferocious enemy from emerging into the public's consciousness. Lifting of this media cover up will be analogous to lifting of repression in psychotherapy, the patient being the public of India as a whole rather than an individual. Beneficial changes that occur in psychotherapy are often ascribed to the lifting of repression, but the lifting of repression itself is a consequence of changes in the situation that enable the threatening thoughts and feelings to emerge. It is fear, anxiety and such emotions evoked by the repressed thoughts that keep them from emerging into consciousness and it is a change in the situation -- such as the empathy and support of a powerful and respected authority figure, the therapist -- which reduces the fear and anxiety and enables the repressed thoughts to emerge. The bottomless dread of the white man, caused by the incomparable military supremacy over Indians of the British and now the Americans -- note the post above about the United States' view of the people of countries like Iran, India and Pakistan as "These guys are ants ... When the time comes, you crush them" -- and the exercise of their power by the British after 1857, killing over ten million Indians in just the ten years after 1857 (I have cited elesewhere The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh): "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:...") which continued right up to 1947 -- is responsible for the 'repression' which is the media cover up of the facts regarding the ferocious enemy that the United States is of India. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will change the situation so that India will be able to use its human and material resources to build a nuclear arsenal to destroy the enemy that is the United States while also lifting the media cover up of the facts which show that India has no greater enemy than the United States.Since the 'repression' is due to fear of the military might of the white man -- the white man's economic advantages are a consequence of his military might which can be used for the economic exploitation of the weak as I have shown above -- the change in the situation has to involve the exercise of military might. At the moment, India has the ability to exercise its nuclear might against the traitors in New Delhi who block the build up of India's nuclear arsenal so it can destroy the enemy that is the United States. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will make possible such build up. I have shown elsewhere how the financial and other wherewithal for such build up is available to India.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But I have said since the above that one can by-pass such traitor-obstructors in New Delhi by delivering just two nuclear warheads with two missiles to Washington and New York, with the capabilities India already has, without first destroying the traitors and building up India’s nuclear arsenal.

A further point needs to be made. It is for a leader to lead his people out of slavery. If a leader talks of increasing India's power millions of times by the actual USE of its nuclear weapons against the United States, the people will understand and will follow. Those on the payroll of the C.I.A. -- all the politicians I mentioned above, the generals, the so-called ‘strategic experts‘, the media people, etc. -- will NOT talk about it. These politicians are unfit to lead. The people would not even know what is possible if they never hear about the possibilities. RAW is dedicated to ensuring that the people never hear of the possibilities (see http://whatyoushouldknowaboutraw.blogspot.com/ ). There IS an Indian and only one Indian who knows India's present state and the possibilities, talks about the possibilities, is fit to lead and has been India's true leader. But the people have never heard about him.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is what I said on Pakistan Defence Forum yesterday:-
---------------------------------------------------------------
On September 1, 2008 I wrote:-

"In my letter dated June 27, 2004 ... I wrote “Technology, however, is necessary but not sufficient for independence; if the perceived willingness -- perceived by yourself and others -- to use your arms is zero, their value -- deterrent and other -- is zero. The United States has a decisive advantage -- ideological, economic and military -- over the rest of the world because of its demonstrated willingness to use its nuclear arms.” This applies as much to the use of nuclear arms within the country against agents of a foreign power -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will be the first such use of nuclear arms -- as outside the country. Also, as I have repeatedly emphasised, nuclear arms against the United States are needed not to “deter” it but to actually destroy it because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy, that is, to overcome deterrence. In other words, the United States cannot be deterred, only destroyed. For this India needs nuclear supremacy over the United States and a minimum of ten thousand nuclear warheads -- an objective that is well within India’s reach; attaining this objective requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi first."

On January 22, 2008 I wrote:-

"For the United States, striving for nuclear supremacy over all nations of the world is an axiom of its foreign policy. An example of the United States' determination to prevent India from emerging out of slavery is in the following report from The Guardian of January 22 '08 where a former Chairman of the United States' Joint Chiefs of Staff and others talk of a nuclear first strike on India (without actually naming it) to keep it in a state of slavery:-

"The west must be ready to resort to a pre-emptive nuclear attack to try to halt the "imminent" spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, according to a radical manifesto for a new Nato by five of the west's most senior military officers and strategists. Calling for root-and-branch reform of Nato and a new pact drawing the US, Nato and the European Union together in a "grand strategy" to tackle the challenges of an increasingly brutal world, the former armed forces chiefs from the US, Britain, Germany, France and the Netherlands insist that a "first strike" nuclear option remains an "indispensable instrument" since there is "simply no realistic prospect of a nuclear-free world".The manifesto has been written following discussions with active commanders and policymakers, many of whom are unable or unwilling to publicly air their views. It has been presented to the Pentagon in Washington and to Nato's secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, over the past 10 days. The proposals are likely to be discussed at a Nato summit in Bucharest in April."The risk of further [nuclear] proliferation is imminent and, with it, the danger that nuclear war fighting, albeit limited in scope, might become possible," the authors argued in the 150-page blueprint for urgent reform of western military strategy and structures. "The first use of nuclear weapons must remain in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction."The authors - General John Shalikashvili, the former chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff and Nato's ex-supreme commander in Europe, General Klaus Naumann, Germany's former top soldier and ex-chairman of Nato's military committee, General Henk van den Breemen, a former Dutch chief of staff, Admiral Jacques Lanxade, a former French chief of staff, and Lord Inge, field marshal and ex-chief of the general staff and the defence staff in the UK - paint an alarming picture of the threats and challenges confronting the west in the post-9/11 world and deliver a withering verdict on the ability to cope.""

In fact, one can go well beyond what I said above. On April 19, 2009 I said:

"Delivering nuclear warheads to New York and Washington can be done without waiting by using a single warhead and doing without most of the extra weight of bells and whistles of countermeasures, precise guidance, etc. With the present state of the United States’ anti-ballistic missile defences, just two missiles carrying just one warhead each to New York City and Washington, D.C. will almost certainly get through. More will follow, destroying other cities, if there is any retaliation. Willingness to USE your nuclear arms, not just brandishing them, increases your power millions of times. Destroying two United States cities NOW will solve all of India’s problems. Almost as effective will be destroying Tel Aviv and Haifa now, with the threat to destroy New York and Washington if there is any retaliation. The key is to DO it, without any ado."

The actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times. By controlling your behaviour into not using them, your enemies neutralise them as surely as with any anti-ballistic missile system. It is like neutralizing a bomber aircraft by paralyzing the crew’s ability to press the necessary buttons. There is nothing India needs more urgently than to use its nuclear arms against the United States or its agents in New Delhi."

Regarding the above, the following points need to be emphasized:-

1. The actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times. By controlling your behavior into not using them -- this can be done by physical (including contact), chemical, financial or verbal/behavioral/psychological means including technological and other ‘aid‘/‘help‘ of various kinds-- your enemies neutralise your nuclear arms as surely as with any anti-ballistic missile systems.

2. Instead of first destroying the traitors in New Delhi, then building up India’s nuclear arms and then destroying the United States, one can by-pass the traitors in New Delhi by delivering just two nuclear warheads, of even twenty kilotons each, one to Washington and one to New York, with the capabilities India already has.

3. There is nothing India needs more urgently than to USE its nuclear arms against the United States.
------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDED ON APRIL 23, 2009: The following are posts today on Pakistan Defence Forum:-

Post by a Pakistani:-
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(Quoting from my earlier post) :
“I have said that just two nuclear warheads of even twenty kilotons each delivered to Washington and New York will increase India's power millions of times. These will be accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. These two twenty kiloton deliveries will destroy not just these cities but the United States and will be even more effective than multiple warheads in the megaton range delivered to each major city of the United States.”

and then India will no longer exist. India will be nuked from all sides of earth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My post:-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 25, 2008, I wrote:-

"Another point that needs to be made is the capacity of countries like India and Pakistan, with a low degree of urbanisation, to survive a full-fledged nuclear war against a country such as the United States which has a high degree of urbanisation. If both India and the United States launch 5,000 nuclear warheads at each other, targeting the 4,000 largest population centers in the other country (let us assume for simplicity that anti-missile systems are not a significant factor with such a large number of warheads, though, in fact, I have predicted India's anti-missile systems will be far more effective than the United States'), what percentage of India's population will be in its 4,000 largest population centers as compared to the percentage of the United States' population that will be in its 4,000 largest population centers? The fact of the matter is that even if 60% or 90% or 95% of India's population perishes in a full-scale nuclear war with the United States, the remaining population -- say 50 million -- will equal India's population in its classical period and India will survive, with a life-style comparable to that in its classical period. On the other hand, the United States cannot survive the destruction of its 4,000 largest population centers because of the high degree of urbanisation, technology intensive life-styles and other cultural factors. To put it another way, if India loses ALL its electricity permanently, it will survive; the United States cannot. I am predicting that the population of the United States that survives being killed immediately by the nuclear explosions will survive for a limited time period by people eating one another till no one remains alive."

In fact, the United States will not survive even the destruction of Washington and New York in a first strike by India with just two twenty kiloton warheads accompanied by a warning to destroy additional cities like Chicago if there is any retaliation. A first strike by India makes the crucial difference. It will increase India's power millions of times while the United States, though the people will not be eating one another, will be destroyed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My post:-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 25, 2008, I said, in part:-

"Another important point is that weapons such as tanks and fighter planes which carry human beings are a lot more difficult to design and produce than, say, intercontinental ballistic missiles which give a million times or more returns for the same investment of time and effort ('bang for the buck') so far as increasing a country's military power is concerned. Since India's principal aim should be nuclear supremacy, it should focus on designing and producing intercontinental ballistic missiles more than tanks and fighter planes; if you have nuclear supremacy over the United States, most other defence-related issues will take care of themselves. And, as I said, designing and building ICBMs that will do the job can be done a lot faster and require fewer resources, though India has the resources to build both ICBMs and tanks and fighter planes. The main advantage of focusing on ICBMs is time; it will bring India military supremacy a lot sooner than giving a lot of attention to tanks and fighter planes (which will never bring India military supremacy over the United States). Another point is that although India should build nuclear-propelled, nuclear-armed submarines carrying intercontinental ballistic missiles (SSBNs), like the ATV it is building, building these weapons platforms (SSBNs) is a lot more time and resource-consuming than building ICBMs that can be launched from road and rail-mobile vehicles. It is a mistake to make India's nuclear arsenal primarily a second strike resource (which is what SSBNs are good at); India's nuclear arsenal should primarily be for a first strike -- that is how you gain nuclear supremacy, by being able to carry out a successful first strike -- and a sufficiently large arsenal of road and rail-mobile ICBMs can be produced a lot faster than an arsenal based on SSBNs. Again, time is important. This does not mean India should not produce SSBNs, just that the emphasis should be on producing a large number of road and rail-mobile ICBMs. I also believe that India's anti-ballistic missile systems will be considerably better than those of the United States -- as DRDO has correctly said, its systems to defend against short and medium range missiles are already better than those of the United States -- if India can avoid sabotage by politicians and RAW on the C.I.A.'s payroll who try to shove american 'help' down India's throat. This is another reason India can afford to focus on road and rail-mobile ICBMs rather than on SSBNs (SSBNs are inherently difficult to destroy; with a really effective ABM system, India's road and rail-mobile ICBMs will also be difficult to destroy). Avoiding foreign 'help' is not a matter of 'false pride'; avoiding foreign help is essential for India's nuclear supremacy. ... Instead of ICBMs, India's nuclear weapons may primarily be delivered by the hyperplane (Avatar) under development. And its defence against enemy ICBMs may be provided by the space-based weapons, Durga (Directionally Unrestricted Ray-Gun Array) and Kali (Kinetic Attack Loitering Interceptor) systems."

But India can destroy Washington and New York with two twenty kiloton warheads with the capabilities it already has and it can do so NOW, without waiting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


My post:-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any other questions, children?

(Don't be distracted by attempts of C.I.A.-RAW operatives here to derail the thread with irrelevant posts).

About how Pakistan can deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States, I have said the following on this board which I am bringing together with the dates:-

"January 11, 2009: For country A to deter country B with its nuclear weapons, country A has to be able to deliver its nuclear weapons to country B. Everyone knows Pakistan can deliver its nuclear weapons to India. But the country that is currently carrying out twice weekly attacks on Pakistan's territory is the United States. How can Pakistan deter the United States? Even without Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs), it is not difficult to think of ways Pakistan could deliver half a dozen nuclear weapons to the United States' coastal cities such as New York and Washington. This thread is meant to explore ways in which Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States, the knowledge of which would deter the United States.

January 14, 2009: Any one who has an 'understanding' with a foreign power for attacks on his own country's territory is a slave. As I have said in another thread, both India and Pakistan are such slaves of the white man.

I have said that the drone attacks are the start of a campaign by the United States to occupy and recolonise the subcontinent. Therefore India has to worry about the drone attacks as much as Pakistan and India has as much responsibility to stop them as does Pakistan.

Since the attacker is a nuclear power, stopping the drone attacks has to include the possible use of nuclear weapons. "Why do we need to deliver nuclear weapons to the US?" Because the United States is attacking your territory and it is a nuclear power. Since the drone attacks are as much a threat to India as they are to Pakistan, India will have to stop them if Pakistan will not.

Most Pakistanis would understand this. RAW has some operatives on this forum with Pakistani identities. Since RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India (and Pakistan), it tries to stop any discussion of how these countries could defend themselves against the United States. I don't know if you are one of those but post # 2 ... [in an earlier thread] is by a RAW operative who registered after I started this thread and then posted something to try to stop any discussion of how Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States the knowledge of which will deter the United States from attacking Pakistan. Only someone who thinks that the white master has the right to do any thing he wants to his Indian and Pakistani slaves will object to such a discussion.January 15, 2009: RAW is not the only intelligence agency posting on such boards. So does the C.I.A. This S-2 person is from the C.I.A. Both RAW and the C.I.A. try to prevent any discussion of how countries like India and Pakistan can defend themselves against the United States.

I have said that the prospect of Pakistan delivering half a dozen nuclear weapons to its coastal cities such as New York and Washington will stop the U.S. and its drone attacks cold. It does not matter if the United States' air force is a hundred times more capable than Pakistan's or its army has equipment poor Asians can't dream of; that is the beauty of nuclear weapons; they are a great EQUALISER.

So let us consider how Pakistan could deliver nuclear weapons to U.S. coastal cities. One way it can do so is by cruise missiles mounted on naval vessels -- which could be submarines or surface vessels. Pakistan has nuclear capable cruise missiles which can be mounted on surface ships. The ship(s) will have to get within range of the target city. If the range of its nuclear capable cruise missiles is 500 miles, the ship will have to get within 500 miles of the target city. Note that this does not have to be a ship belonging to the navy. There is no reason why cruise missiles cannot be installed on merchant ships and properly camouflaged and launched when the ship gets within range of the target.Pakistan also has ballistic missiles of various ranges that are nuclear capable. Such missiles CAN be launched from surface ships, even merchant ships, from specially designed launching platforms and camouflaged/hidden till they get within range of the target.

What are some of the other possibilities? Now is the time to get creative."

Much of what I have said in the posts above about India applies to Pakistan as well: increasing the range of long-range ballistic missiles by doing without most of the the extra weight of the bells and whistles of counter-measures, precise guidance, etc. given the present state of anti-ballistic missile defences of the slave-masters; a lot more focus, of time and resources, on long-range nuclear armed missiles capable of hitting the slave-masters of the world than on tanks and fighter planes that can be used only against other slave countries or, even if used against the slave-master, will not bring military victory over him, etc.

Note that, for India, I am saying a first strike on the slave-master is what is needed, not deterrence. Pakistan may be content by deterring the slave-master, which is looking for excuses to invade Pakistan on the pretext of dealing with the Taliban, etc. If the Taliban are now in Pakistan, that is because the slave-master has invaded and occupied their country; naturally, they have to go elsewhere in the subcontinent. It is obscene to call Afghan patriots defending their country against foreign invaders "insurgents". The United States claims a right to go all over the world and impose regime changes, culture changes and what not for its own "security"; the Taliban can't even go elsewhere in the subcontinent?

ADDED ON APRIL 24, 2009: The first and foremost point is that the United States has absolutely no right to be in Afghanistan and both India’s and Pakistan’s primary concern should be to militarily eject the United States and NATO forces from Afghanistan. Pakistan’s president and prime minister who talk of fighting the Taliban but not of fighting the Americans who have been carrying out drone attacks on Pakistan deserve to be whipped before being executed. The same for India’s traitor prime minister, foreign minister, National Security Advisor, Foreign Secretary, etc. Ejecting the United States from Afghanistan and stopping its attempts to impose slavery on India by various means such as the nuclear deal necessarily requires the use of nuclear weapons: a first strike with two twenty kiloton warheads, one to Washington and one to New York, accompanied by a warning of similar strikes on other cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. This can and must be done NOW, without waiting for anything.

The following are posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In another thread, I mentioned the Tamil Rakshas K. Subrahmanyam -- responsible for all C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored separatism and terrorism in the Indian subcontinent since 1983 and, before that, participant in the creation of the insurgency in East Pakistan that led to the creation of Bangladesh, as well as for sabotaging India's strategic programs and policies -- being called "Bhishma Pitamah" (of the Mahabharat) by another Tamil Rakshas on an Indian defence board. He is a moderator there, lives in the U.S. making missiles for the U.S. government and, among other things, collects intelligence on Indian missiles and other subjects for U.S. intelligence agencies. I wonder how many such foreign intelligence agents are on this board.

India's nuclear first strike on Washington and New York with just two twenty kiloton warheads will also put an end to the traitors through whom the slave-master maintains its hold on the subcontinent. Such a first strike by India will solve Pakistan's and Afghanistan's problems also.

As I have said below, those who would like to educate themselves on the issues should go to my blog.

For every so-called 'freedom fighter', there were a hundred Indians faithfully working for the British. Since India's fake 'Independence', the situation has gotten only worse, not better. This is what I said, in part, in a letter dated January 5, 2004 to the press:-

"When the British left India in 1947, they left behind a puppet regime of the kind the Americans are setting up in Iraq and have set up in Afghanistan in the form of the Karzai government. If Indians are to emerge from their centuries of slavery and, in fact, survive, the above program is absolutely essential. India's civil service, police service and military are like the collaborator civil service, police, and military the Americans are setting up in Iraq. Their primary role is to maintain the white man's control over India. India's Constitution was written under a British administrator, Mountbatten, who continued as Governor General of "independent" India, very much as the Constitution of Iraq's puppet/collaborator government is being written under an American administrator ( India's Constitution unabashedly refers to the British king simply as "His Majesty" ). The problem is not the Constitution but the continued control of India's administration and intelligence agencies which continue to function as branches of British/American intelligence agencies. India's Research and Analysis Wing has in innumerable ways suppressed my proposal about money under which India's per capita income can exceed that of the United States in a matter of, say, 15 years. They will implement only those parts of it, in highly diluted form, for which they receive permission from the White Master. When an American Treasury Secretary said that India's GDP growth rate could be 10% per year, then the Research and Analysis Wing dared to advance a growth rate of 8%. India's population at large is equally enslaved. The Americans have disbanded the Iraqi armed forces and are creating a collaborator army; India's army is the collaborator army that helped the British rule India; all it's units and regiments, etc., have retained their identities and trace their origins to the British times. The extreme imbalance of power created by the white man's extreme technological superiority has led to an extremely fierce loyalty to him in the regime and the population at large (see my letter sequence from March, 2002 to April, 2003 about the "inferior Indian niggers" ). It is a thankless task to try to break their chains but I feel I should try."

To see how India is actually governed at present, you should see:
http://whatyoushouldknowaboutraw.blogspot.com/

Because of nuclear weapons, though, now a very few people can wield the power to liberate the country. The nuclear first strike on the United States with just two twenty kiloton warheads on Washington and New York, accompanied by a warning to destroy additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation, will accomplish that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear weapons and their delivery systems are important. No less important is the strategy in their use. In post # 7 above I said:

“I have said that just two nuclear warheads of even twenty kilotons each delivered to Washington and New York will increase India's power millions of times. These will be accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. These two twenty kiloton deliveries will destroy not just these cities but the United States and will be even more effective than multiple warheads in the megaton range delivered to each major city of the United States.”

I have emphasised, in bold, the last sentence. THINK about what it says and how that is true.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDED ON APRIL 25, 2009: The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
---------------------------------------------------------------
On [Bharat-Rakshak] forum, someone who took part in building, with Israeli help, the radar imaging satellite that India just launched, recalls:

" I was with Indian Space prior to my retirement and I was part of the 8 or 10 ( just a handful ) people's group which was formed for this satellite. It was so secretive project that even our PAs and TSs did not know why we were meeting so often. The receiving system was ready in Nov2007 when I had not retired . I remember an amusing incident when that system was installed .. it did not work.. and finally the fault was traced to a Fiber Cable eaten by a r a t. A foreigner joked : Indian rats like hi-tec things .. they did not eat any other copper cable only the Fiber cable. "

This Indian may or may not realise it but when the Israeli referred to "Indian rats", he meant the Indian people whom he was referring to as vermin who deserve to be exterminated. I have written repeatedly [see below] about the deadly poison that is Israeli, American and other foreign technological 'help' to India which keeps India from developing its own capabilities and keeps it in a dependent, childlike relationship to the white man; about Israeli 'help' to India I said in another thread (post # 1 of http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/24823-indias-defence-requires-reunification-india-pakistan.html ) here: "This ethnic group has gone all out, for the past 32 years, to host a parade of Indians in government, politics and other areas for the “bribery of contact” [see above and below] and other kinds of bribes and multifarious and harmful arms, military, intelligence and strategic ‘aid‘, such as during the Kargil war sponsored by the C.I.A. (below), as cover for its infinitely greater injuries to India, including fatal economic, military and strategic injuries."

For perspective, that post is worth repeating in full:-

"An article (by Kaplan) in the New York Times of December 8, 2008 called for separating north and central India from the south, treating it as part of the Middle East and for America to be “at all places [of the Middle East, of which India, according to him, is a part] at once … with every bit of energy and constant attention that our national security apparatus -- and those of our allies -- can bring to bear”, including troops, colonising India with invasions and military operations as the United States has colonised the rest of the Middle East. This is the “jurisdiction” over India the Americans are claiming. The same article -- this was before Obama assumed office -- named Holbrooke as the U.S. envoy to the subcontinent who will bring about this overt colonisation of the subcontinent. And Holbrooke it is who has been appointed for this task! Obama has been made president by an ethnic group which controls not just the media in the United States but its government and foreign policy (see http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml ) . It is their aim to turn the subcontinent into a part of the Middle East and part of an overt American empire. Kaplan belongs to this ethnic group. Both of Holbrooke’s parents and his wife have been from this ethnic group. This ethnic group has gone all out, for the past 32 years, to host a parade of Indians in government, politics and other areas for the “bribery of contact” (above and below) and other kinds of bribes and multifarious and harmful arms, military, intelligence and strategic ‘aid‘, such as during the Kargil war sponsored by the C.I.A. (below), as cover for its infinitely greater injuries to India, including fatal economic, military and strategic injuries. This ethnic group has established substantial control, not the least over media including cinema and cinema theater chains, since a letter of mine that appeared in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper about the movie ‘Schindler’s List’ on the World War II holocaust. Afghanistan is the land of the Rig Veda where India's Vedic culture originated. The U.S. occupation of Afghanistan is occupation of India, just as U.S. attacks on Pakistan are attacks on India. India IS the real target of U.S. occupation of Afghanistan and partial occupation of Pakistan, as I have said above. The United States' occupation of Afghanistan, its drone attacks on Pakistan, etc., are directed toward eventually occupying India and establishing overt colonial rule over the entire Indian subcontinent. Unfortunately, the people and governments of the subcontinent are children who do not know what is going on and the fate that awaits them. Each day that goes by without India engaged in a crash program of producing ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the United States is a precious day lost in a war for survival. India's Foreign Minister, Pranab Mukherjee, who has been facilitating this and whom Holbrooke sees on his imperial visits to India, is a C.I.A. agent who was the one who signed the Defence Framework Agreement with the United States -- aimed at establishing a colonial relationship between the U.S. and Indian armed forces -- a few weeks before the nuclear deal -- which is aimed at capping, rolling back and eliminating India's nuclear weapons program -- was announced. Mukherjee is far from being the only member of the Indian government under U.S. control. I have said one nuclear bomb will be targeted at the RAW headquarters and another at North and South Blocks in New Delhi to destroy enough of these traitors and start on a program of what India needs to do to survive and defeat its mortal enemies which ane NOT Pakistan and China; RAW tries mightily to keep Indians preoccupied with thinking of Pakistan and China as its enemies.India-Pakistan conflicts of today are no different from the Hindu-Muslim rioting that accompanied the partition in 1947 and was instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which had remained loyal to the British after 1947. The only change is that the United States has taken the place of Britain. RAW, which was split off from the Intelligence Bureau, functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India [ see http://whatyoushouldknowaboutraw.blogspot.com ] and something similar is the case with the other intelligence agencies of the region. They are used for terrorist acts in the Subcontinent by the C.I.A. for various purposes, just as the Kargil war was staged by C.I.A.-RAW, with the help of Pakistan's C.I.A.-controlled army chief (Musharraf), to help Vajpayee win the election that was pending after he had lost a vote of confidence and thus help him remain prime minister; Vajpayee used to be an informant for the British before Independence and has been a C.I.A. agent since the United States replaced Britain as the imperial power over the subcontinent and he is far from being the only politician who has been a C.I.A. agent. Nehru was a life-long British agent, as he admitted to American ambassador Galbraith and his descendents (Indira, Rajiv) have been C.I.A. agents, though they also had a relationship with the KGB because Indira became prime minister by the KGB's assassination of Shastri in Tashkent at the C.I.A.'s request. A C.I.A. specialist on India who came on Bharat-Rakshak forum a few months ago was asking that India acquiesce in the American invasion and occupation of Pakistan and later of India. He said that Pakistan's defences have been electronically neutralised to allow the ingress of Predator drones (this was before the drone attacks started) and that Pakistan's military is quite cooperative; Musharraf was not the only C.I.A. agent in the military. So it all boils down to continued white rule over India and Pakistan after 1947; it is just that the control of these countries has been transferred to covert agencies and they are nominally independent. The United States now wants to overtly occupy and rule the subcontinent, starting with Pakistan. The natives are willing to fight other non-white people like tigers, but behave like obedient dogs to the white master. RAW actively works to make overt American rule over India happen and India's so-called ruling class -- actually, puppet class -- is only too happy at the prospect because it felt orphaned when the British left India.

The firangi is India and Pakistan's common enemy. They both need to defend against the firangi. They can do so while remaining separate nations and coordinating their defence. Or they can end the partition imposed on them by the British 'divide and rule' policy. Because of the firangi's skill in dividing people, they will be safer ending the partition."

I wrote above that "one nuclear bomb will be targeted at the RAW headquarters and another at North and South Blocks in New Delhi to destroy enough of these traitors and start on a program of what India needs to do to survive and defeat its mortal enemies which are NOT Pakistan and China". But now I am saying India can deliver one twenty kiloton nuclear bomb to Washington and another to New York, accompanied by a warning of similar deliveries, in case of any retaliation, to additional cities such as Chicago, to destroy its enemies and India can and must do so NOW, with the capabilities it already has. And India should do so without waiting for Pakistan to do anything.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDED ON APRIL 27, 2009: Far more than Prabhakaran, India ought to be arresting and prosecuting K. Subrahmanyam and not just for the killings of Indira and Rajiv Gandhi and hanging K. Subrahmanyam, not Afzal Guru. The Tamil Rakshas on Bharat-Rakshak forum I referred to above, who works for U. S. intelligence agencies and called K. Subrahmanyam “Bhishma Pitamah”, refers to “DIEnasty politics” killing Indira and Rajiv but it was not politics but C.I.A.-RAW and, specifically, K. Subrahmanyam who killed them, because of my ‘influence’ on them because of which India's strategic programs, aimed at defence against the United States, were started and re-started. Vajpayee shut them down, contrary to his stance in claiming 'credit' for the nuclear tests, carried out to deceive people because I wrote "Defence is not on the agenda" (see addendum of March 20, 2009 above). Both RAW and the C.I.A. have been threatening me with a nasty death and other things; see threats to me -- along with an offer to transfer one crore rupees into my account within 48 hours if I was "willing to cooperate with us at RAW?" and saying "we are seeking your cooperation for a very important matter, i.e. the cause of Indo-US friendship. I am pleased to inform you that we will be awarding you handsomely for your cooperation. We will transfer the sum of INR 10,000,000/- (1 crore rupees) to your bank account within 48 hours of receiving confirmation of your willingness to assist us" -- posted by K. Subrahmanyam and the C.I.A. Director Michael Hayden on an article of mine on August 10 and 11, 2008 which was published, after totally altering it and eliminating all of the main points, under the title "Ridding India of foreigners for nuclear autonomy" (the title I had given it was "National Security: Ridding India of Firangis & Their Agents"; see addendum dated August 4, 2008 below for the article as I sent it; the threats and the offer of one crore rupees are at http://www.merinews.com/commentAll.jsp?articleID=138816 and in the attachment to this E-Mail) because of which I have had to stop going out of the house for the past couple of months; these threats have been made with the fullest knowledge of India's politicians, government, media and others; is there any provision of "security", Z-plus or other, for me?

Illustrating what I have said about the Tamil Rakshasas being a constant conduit for the entry of India’s enemies into the subcontinent, “Obama only hope for Lanka issue: Vaiko: … MDMK leader Monday said US President … was “the only hope” to ensure a solution for the Sri Lanka Tamils issue and sought his intervention … in a letter sent to Mr. Obama … you (Obama) are the only hope for us, who can effectively intervene to stop the genocidal war [meaning the insurgency created by K. Subrahmanyam, as he later did in Punjab and elsewhere, as I have said; the language and ethnic issue, if any, was no more than what led to the creation of Haryana from Punjab; one can easily create an insurgency of left-handed people against right-handed people] of Sri Lanka and save our Tamils” … “ (PTI report in The Hindu, April 27 ‘09, Internet). A by-product of India’s nuclear destruction of the United States (above) will be India regaining control over India, not just up to the Hindukush (“Hindu-killer”) mountain ranges.

A C.I.A.-RAW operative who writes for the Hindustan Times says “The Congress … may play its final trump card and propose the name of … Shinde, a dalit, for PM. No political party will be able to reject his candidature … “. India must reject all politics and all politicians.

As for "security", Z-plus or other, for me, this is what I said about "security" on April 11 '09: "One of the tactics C.I.A.-RAW regularly uses -- most recently it did so with the ISRO chief -- is to announce a terror threat against an individual or institution and provide it with “security” -- the ISRO chief has been given ‘Z-level’ security -- which serves to give them ‘status’ -- as a bribe -- as well as intimidate them and bring them on the side of C.I.A.-RAW and the United States in the ‘war on terror’ and, by induction, for other purposes such as letting the U.S. participate in -- and thereby take control of -- India’s space program -- recently the ISRO chief had shown skittishness about such dependence, calling the spy satellite to be launched on April 20th an Indian satellite, because of my earlier negative comment about ISRO launching an Israeli spy satellite -- and thereby ‘neutralise’ me and keep India’s enslavement rolling along. The LeT and other entities from which the threats emanate are, of course, totally C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored and controlled entities. If the tactic does not suffice, C.I.A.-RAW can actually carry out an attack, as it has carried out hundreds of attacks in India since 1983, to keep the terror threats credible as well as for other purposes."

Is the father of India's strategic program, the greatest Indian scientist since ancient times and the greatest living Indian, under threat and harassment from C.I.A.-RAW for decades and now faced with an acute crisis and imminent threat to his life and limbs, entitled to "security"? But C.I.A.-RAW decides who gets "security".

ADDED ON APRIL 29, 2009: The following are posts today on Pakistan Defence Forum:-
Post by a Pakistani:
------------------------------------------------------------------
US biggest enemy are the US policy makers.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Post by me:-
------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S.'s biggest enemy is the C.I.A. as it is of the world. The C.I.A. and its associated intelligence agencies such as the one to which the Australian above belongs and their Indian slaves have been committing crimes against India and the world from before they started their crimes against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian 32 years ago. Psychologist B. F. Skinner, with a fundamentally and grossly erroneous theory of human nature set the C.I.A. -- whose agenda has been set by ignorant and criminal Harvard professors rather than by U.S. presidents or Congress -- on this disastrous course. Through the C.I.A., he imposed his agenda on India and the rest of the world as well. Neither past nor the current Negro president of the U.S. seem capable of anything else, puppets of the C.I.A. as they are. It won't be long before the world is rid of this evil.

This is what I wrote in a letter dated April 28, 2006 to the press:-

"Regarding the case of a novel by an Indian sophomore at Harvard: a graduate student from the Indian subcontinent at Boston's Northeastern University was accused of plagiarism because the quality of English in assigned work she turned in for a course was incomparably superior to anything she was capable of writing and, to prove this, she was required to answer the same questions in the presence of a faculty member. She wrote about thirty pages in perhaps two hours which exactly reproduced what she had earlier turned in. The faculty member alleged she had copied from papers she had with her. In her rebuttal, the student wrote this faculty member was watching her like the proverbial "hawk" throughout this session and her charge of copying was a "damnable lie". She explained, in her rebuttal and to her faculty adviser, that she had "memorized" what she reproduced in the presence of the faculty member. The lying faculty member was obliged to leave the university.

The Harvard sophomore, an Indian-American, says (New York Times, April 27 '06, Internet) she had read the books from which she is alleged to have plagiarized three or four times, that she has a "photographic memory" and had last read the books some time before she wrote her own book. Psychologist B. F. Skinner, whose plagiarism I exposed (see letter dated February 26 '05 below), upon which he was awarded an honorary doctorate by Harvard and I was mugged in a Harvard seminar (see letter dated May 11 '05 below), wrote in his 'Notebooks' that the practice, several thousands of years old and still continuing, of Brahmin priests memorizing entire books (such as the Vedas) may have had a (genetically) "selective effect" endowing them with superior memory (and other cognitive abilities). Memorization of very long texts is still the standard way students learn, at all levels, in the Indian subcontinent and the practice is not limited to Brahmin priests (the Northeastern University student was Muslim). Such ability, commonplace to Indians, is astonishing to Americans. The Harvard sophomore, of Indian origin with near perfect SAT scores, can be expected to have genetically superior memory and her explanation of how she came to reproduce portions of books she had read is believable. This does not mean that she did not intentionally plagiarize, just that her explanation is credible.Skinner, author of 'Verbal Behavior', describes playing the "sedulous ape" to established authors as a way budding authors learn. Examples of similarities between the Harvard sophomore's novel and the novels she read (Boston Globe, April 25 '06, Internet) would have fit this description if the similarities were intentional. The similarities could be unconscious yet intentional (there are unconscious intentions). But they could have been both unconscious and unintentional, because of the way a person's verbal repertoire is formed. Skinner's own plagiarism was infinitely more serious (see my paper in BEHAVIORISM, Spring, 1976). Skinner was voted by American psychology department chairpersons as the most influential living psychologist and, along with Sigmund Freud, one of the two most influential psychologists of all time. A survey showed that his world-wide reputation exceeded the combined reputation of the thirty or so Nobel prize winners in the Boston area. It was based on his position of 'radical behaviorism' which he defined in terms of his opposition to what he called 'mentalism' and Freud, of course, is the great mentalist. For his position to be viable, he had to provide an account of the so-called 'higher mental processes' such as language, which he did in 'Verbal Behavior'. By showing that his account of language was simply a refinement of the work of Freud, my paper in BEHAVIORISM eliminated any basic distinction between his position and Freud's and the basis for his claim to being a great and original thinker. In a question and answer session with thousands of his followers who packed the grand ballroom of the Hilton hotel in Chicago in May, 1977, he was very angrily denounced by his own followers, such as by one who stood up, livid with rage, shouting, referring to my paper and its implications ("SATISH CHANDRA HAS SHOWN..."), for the fraud he had perpetrated on them and the world; his world-wide reputation and appearance on TIME magazine's cover, etc., were due to the fundamental importance of the basic nature of human beings, for prescriptions on how they should live and be educated and governed, issues of freedom, etc., of whether they are machines or have a mind or soul and how they function. Skinner acknowledged "similarities" between him and Freud shown by "Chandra" in "BEHAVIORISM", but had no response beyond first emphatically and aggressively saying "Or Jesus Christ! Or B. F. Skinner!" in the same breath, then minimizing the importance of such matters by appealing to the general state of ethics and what is acceptable in academia with a light-hearted "what--Miller wrote it, Gallanter takes credit for it, Pribram believes it!" (these were co-authors of a book in cognitive psychology). Upto then, Skinner had had his critics such as Chomsky of M.I.T. but had, correctly, maintained that Chomsky's review of 'Verbal Behavior' was based on very poor scholarship and a misunderstanding of his position. He could not say that about my paper in BEHAVIORISM, the principal vehicle for theoretical work in radical behaviorism, whose editor called me with profound emotion about a day after he received it and wrote to me "Heartiest congratulations on what I regard to be a major contribution to work in the field". From Germany alone, more than two dozen psychologists wrote me requesting reprints, besides every behaviorist in the United States. That paper was effective in a way that Chomsky's was not and killed behaviorism ( the journal's name has been changed to 'Behavior and Philosophy'). Skinner himself wrote to me (see excerpts from his letter on my web page: http://www.psychotherapy.eboard.com/ ) about that paper, before the above session with his followers, "...want to tell you, while the spell is on me, how much I admire what you have done. You have made a much more courageous use of the autoclitic and the atomic operant than I did, with breath-taking results. Seldom have I read a paper that seemed to me to contain so much that was new and forward-moving...", etc. But after the above session with his followers, his behavior was very different (see the letter sequence below).

Verbal behavior is a far more complicated matter than either Skinner or Freud (or cognitive psychology) provide for. For example, person A can show induction from person B's verbal behavior without ever coming into contact (as conventionally understood) with person B's verbal behavior. The Harvard sophomore, though, had repeated, extended contact with the other author's books. In an example (Boston Globe, April 24 '06, Internet) both authors refer to "170 specialty stores". This puts a question mark on intentional plagiarizing, because an intentional plagiarizer would have changed the number to something other than 170."

U.S. conservative William F. Buckley who, after finishing Yale, worked as a C.I.A. agent in Mexico delivering envelopes full of cash to all and sundry, as he described, once wrote he would rather be ruled by the first 100 names in the Boston telephone directory than by Harvard professors. Unfortunately, the United States is ruled by Harvard professors.

Skinner once said to me: "This department is second rate. Lucky to have you here" after a jew physically assaulted me in a Harvard seminar when I said "I don't think conservation is a useful concept" regarding the explanation of an experiment's results using the concept of conservation; later I realised it was because a prominent jewish psychologist, Jean Piaget, prominently uses the concept of conservation to explain similar experimental results in his work. Skinner's calling the Harvard psychology department "second rate" was correct because a department's rating is determined by the best of the faculty there; Skinner was by far the best and he was second rate, as I explain below; the rest were third and fourth rate. Skinner wrote in an autobiographical essay in his Festschrift that at the beginning of his career an older psychologist told him "It takes one little idea to be a success in American psychology" and wrote 'he measured the idea with a thumb and forefinger' -- meaning a homunculus, a spirit or 'soul'. Skinner decided to be successful by radically denying the existence of any spirit or soul through his 'radical behaviorism'. Skinner's basic motivation was, in true American fashion, to be a "success" (as a businessman is called 'successful') which had no provision for intellectual integrity; this is what made him second rate. At the end of his 'Verbal Behavior' he says 'a science of verbal behavior makes no provision for "truth or certainty" though "we can't even be sure of the truth of that".' In other words, he was saying truth was not a useful concept in his science of verbal behavior. Skinner was considered a "giant", an all-time great in the history of human thought, towering like Plato and Aristotle and, for many, eclipsing them, because such psychological theories as to the basic nature of man underpin philosophy and religion as well and Skinner was all over these fields, particularly philosophy.

The Harvard psychology department, like other U. S. psychology departments, was dominated by jews and their primary motivation was maintaining jewish control over the field and over academia.

In his Festschrift essay, Skinner also wrote that perhaps he has tried to overcome his "early fear of theological ghosts" through his radical behaviorism. In my last meeting with him (on March 23 or 24, 1978), in which I brought up the concept of time and Einstein's twin paradox, I said (rhetorically as a question, actually as an assertion or proposition) "Is it true that everything exists at all times and that things 'pass' [mockingly with an American pronunciation and with a stern face implying disapproval of American negligence which cannot even preserve pronunciation over a few generations and was an indicator of general intellectual sloppiness and inferiority; compare the precision of pronunciation, not just words, with which the Vedas and other works have been transmitted orally over millenia] is an illusion?" -- because his fear of theological ghosts was also a fear of death, also shown by his emphasis on 'survival' as the ultimate value. Skinner dodged the question by asking, rhetorically, "Illusion??" but I heard him say several years later in a lecture in the Boston area "When I die, I will cease to exist", which was his answer to my rhetorical question. My reference to Einstein, who never conducted any experiments except 'thought experiments' and whose work was purely theoretical, was also a refutation of Skinner's position, both in his published work and to me personally, which held any one who has not done any laboratory experimental work has done no worthwhile scientific work -- and my paper in BEHAVIORISM was purely theoretical -- though, as I have said, my laboratory work with rats, which I was forced to stop in 1974, if and when completed, will revolutionise biology and medicine, as well as physics. Later, in a published account, his assistant, a jew who participated in crimes against me at Harvard, recalled Skinner's implied acknowledgment of the jew Einstein's superiority over him but Skinner never had the integrity to retract his crimes, through jews, through the C.I.A. and others, against me which have continued to this day. Once Skinner said to me "You don't get support because you are brilliant, or that you do brilliant work". When I asked him what, then, gets support, he replied "It's a business".

In fact, it is not even business but robbery of the worst kind. The C.I.A.'s Skinner-assigned agenda with respect to me is to steal my work through the 24-hour satellite surveillance of me, but denying me all 'reinforcement' -- that is recognition/reward/the wherewithal for life, etc. -- except of the kind through which laboratory pigeons are induced to peck a key tens of thousands of times for each grain of food, so their beaks are worn down to their skin and their face muscles swell, while inflicting the worst kind of verbal injuries (such as calling me delusional or schizophrenic, threatening to put me in a mental hospital, calling me ugly or stupid as K. Subrahmanyam does in comments he posted on my articles at merinews.com and C.I.A.-RAW operatives regularly do on any online forum I go to, etc. etc.) and material injuries (robbing me of career, life, any income, a place to live or work, as well as money, properties, etc. I already had in India, tampering with my eye medication in transit and making me blind for two years, etc. etc.) on me -- including by contacting people I come in contact with and, use rewards (examples of which I have given below and include Amartya Sen, Subramanian Swamy, the Japanese academic, an Indian, Vinod Gupta, from my residence hall at I.I.T. Kharagpur who was made a bosom pal of the Indian president, Shankar Dayal Sharma, overnight, holding his wedding in Rashtrapati Bhavan, made a bosom pal of Bill Clinton when president, others in various walks of life including jounalists, politicians, etc.), harassment (such as blocking their mail and threatening to ruin their business or deprive them of their job or jailing them as in the case of the Editor-Publisher of the Indian newspaper in New York which carried front page reports with banner headlines on crimes against me, forcing the Indian Institute of Advanced Study in Shimla, by "a committee of secretaries" of the Indian government voting to force it out of the buildings it was housed in and I. I. T. Kanpur, by cutting the I. I. T. s' budget and putting a freeze on hiring, to abandon any plans to offer me a position) and, if necessary, murder (examples of which I have given below, including the torture and murder of a muslim newspaper cartoonist in Delhi, of Rajiv and Indira Gandhi, of Indian and American scientists from whom I might have received support) to induce aggression, harassment or injuries by them toward me -- and RAW and all other Indians, in government, the media and elsewhere, have been participating in this with great gusto.

As I said in my letter to the press dated February 26, 2005 (below) "American press reports 3-4 years ago referred to satellite-based technology the United States has had in place to monitor "the conversations of foreign leaders" (not just conversations over the telephone or other electrical/electronic media though it includes ability to monitor electrical/electronic communications of all kinds also). Since at least 1977, the United States has been able to keep individuals under 24-hour video and audio surveillance by satellite. Psychologist B. F. Skinner of Harvard made no secret of "my spies" keeping me under such surveillance, one use of which is a C.I.A. program started by Skinner to "control" a targeted individual's behavior by various verbal (including the use of conditioned stimuli, ratio schedules, etc.) and other means. I was targeted primarily due to Skinner's personal motivation flowing from the fact that I had exposed his plagiarism and destroyed his school of psychology but also because I have been the only threat to the United States' ability to keep India economically, technologically and militarily weak and under its boots (in part through my 'influence' on Prime Minister Indira Gandhi --about which Skinner asked "How about your political contacts on either side-- Mrs. Gandhi?" though I had not breathed a word about any such 'contacts' -- and former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi-- both of whom were assassinated for this reason by India's Research and Analysis Wing on the C.I.A.'s orders). But it would have been surprising if the United States had not used such surveillance and control over other foreign leaders.

An article in a Russian newspaper by an American capitalist consultant on Russia a couple of months ago referred to "the mysteriously self-destructive behavior" of Russia's leaders, referring to the dismantling of the benefits system (the same system of benefits can be administered by private contractors, if desired, who will be paid by the government and those who got free transportation before can still get free transportation), but such behavior started in the mid-eighties, with Mikhail Gorbachev. It is more than likely that similar surveillance and control has been used against Soviet/Russian leaders."

ADDED ON MAY 1, 2009: I have said above that the classical culture, of which Greece was one branch, only exists in rural North India now and it is about to be wiped out with the advent of television. To prevent American intellectual and moral inferiority from destroying India and mankind, it is imperative that all American and other Western media, broadcast, print and, selectively, Internet, be immediately expunged from India and a massive re-education program be undertaken, through educational institutions, particularly primary and secondary schools, educational curricula and the print and broadcast media to reverse the damage already done. This does not mean that India cannot bring in the semester and trimester system in its colleges and universities, use Western scientific journals, etc. The CULTURE must be preserved. This cannot wait for ANYTHING. This is the virus India has to fear the most and do the most to kill and immunise against. What I said in the letter dated May 11, 2005 below is worth repeating:-

"A headline says "American multi-media empire to expand its presence in Russia". More than "infrastructure facilities, defense enterprises, natural monopolies, and the development of strategic natural resources", countries need to guard their information sources. Information sources can make you see white as black and black as white (see, for example, my letter dated April 25, 2005, below, pointing out that the Soviet system was far more equal and, therefore, far more democratic). More than mad cow disease, countries need to protect their citizens from debilitation and death via information sources. It is information imperialism (formal education is part of information sources) that keeps India in the most abject slavery (see letter dated January 5 '04, below); it was to maintain information imperialism that India's greatest scientist, whose work was in the mainstream of Western science, was publicly tortured in a Harvard seminar and it is information imperialism that has kept India's puppet government, media (I have described over the years some of the huge operation of carrots and sticks by which India's Research and Analysis Wing has kept Indian media from reporting on him, on the C.I.A.'s orders) and citizenry participating to the hilt in crimes against him for the past 28 years (see letter dated February 26, 2005, below). It is surrender to the information imperialism of the West (which started with a refusal by TASS in New York to report on the persecution-- whose nature and extent is unprecedented in the history of mankind--of the above Indian scientist) that is responsible for Soviet/Russian self-destruction over the past 20 years which will continue at an accelerating pace under current plans. It is information imperialism that keeps countries of the world from taking advantage of my proposal about money (see letters below).

An example of information imperialism and India's continued slavery is a news item in the Indian press today about a statement of India's prime minister on the way back from the May 9 celebration in Moscow in which he celebrates the two million Indians who fought in World War II and tens of thousands who died. In fact, both in World War I and II, millions of Indians fought whoever and wherever their British colonial masters wanted them to and not a single one of them fought their British colonial masters who had enslaved them. Pakistan's legislature has protested a cartoon in an American newspaper showing Pakistan as a dog loyal to Washington. But India is equally a dog loyal to the white master. Russia is half way to becoming a dog loyal to Washington."

The concepts of both democracy and dictatorship in the West are taken from Greece. Dictators were appointed in Greece to deal with certain situations. The situation in India now demands a dictator. A dictator is needed to build India's economy through my proposal about money (below), its nuclear arms as I have described above and below as well as preserve its culture. The elections in progress must be halted and a dictator appointed.

That dictator can only be me. I am the sage in a Himalayan cave, the philosopher-king that is talked about in political science, the concept that was responsible for Nehru appointing a professor of Indian philosophy at Oxford University, S. Radhakrishnan, India's first Vice President then President and for N. T. Ramarao, on first becoming Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, pitching a little tent in a forest (in Kashmir?) as his abode. Toward the end of his business life, the grandfather mentioned above, with his wife, went on a pilgrimage to all the major sites up to Rameshwaram and, before he left, all the businessmen, shop keepers, etc. came out to touch his feet as he walked home through the main market; the Vindhya range does not break up India. Nor should C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored insurgencies in C.I.A.-RAW-ruled India. There were never any passports or barriers between the hundreds of kingdoms, large and small, including Nepal, that were India and any Indian could go and live anywhere in the subcontinent that was India; nor should there be now. But the firangis have to be expelled from the subcontinent and neutralised against doing any mischief. For that India needs a dictator.

From the barbarous, wild West, India has to reclaim its superior, meditative civilisation and way of life. The ignorant and crimianl Harvard professors, like Skinner (see above), who rule the United States, love "fine wines", are debauched and depraved and violent. They want Indians to be their slaves. (The lack of intellectual integrity -- see above -- was not limited to Skinner. Professors of Physics at M.I.T. know about the overcoming of gravity by thousands of U. S. practitioners of an Indian meditative discipline I have mentioned below -- which has profound implications for the nature of gravity and inertia, as I said on April 5, '05, December 5 '04, December 1 '04 and November 19 '04 below and represents a superior understanding of gravity and inertia, not to mention what it says about the nature of man and his relationship to the world -- and a few of them practise it themselves but an M. I. T. professor, when I tried to document the phenomenon through an administrative assistant at M. I. T. whom I was teaching 'Verbal Behavior' and who told me about this professor being a practitioner of this discipline including the overcoming of gravity during meditation, would not give a written account of it and there is never any acknowledgment of this all-important phenomenon in journals of Physics). Do I have to explain further (see addendums of December 12 '06 to January 9 '07 & of March 18 '09, etc.) how they are turning the populations of India (and China) into their slave workers who suck up the output of ten times as many other Indians while contributing nothing to India's economy, so that in addition to the millions of direct slave labourers, ten times as many other Indians are the indirect slave labourers of the Americans and all India gets in return is dollars which can only ultimately be used to buy American goods and services which, through the multiplier effect I have described, helps the U. S. economy not India's, or to buy worthless American paper (most of India's foreign exchange reserves of hundreds of billions of dollars are in U. S. government paper) which is ultimately only as good as India's ability to militarily enforce the obligations it represents which India has no way of doing and, even if enforced, will help the U. S., not India's economy and which, in multifarious ways, increases the United States' power over India? The government of India today is a government of traitors, regardless of which political party forms the government. Only I, as a dictator, can free India from this slavery and give it true prosperity and Independence. To destroy its enemies, India has to practise superior violence against them. For this India has to renounce pacifism, aim for nuclear supremacy over the United States and make first use of nuclear weapons against the United States. Only I can do that.

It was an M. I. T. professor of Business/Economics (the dean of its Business School, as I recall) who suggested some years ago that India start doing the "backroom" work for American companies to provide jobs for its people, the kind of slave work which, like all "outsourced" work, I refer to, above and below, as being extremely harmful to and exploitative of India, besides being unnecessary. In a pamphlet titled "Crime in Academia and Psychology, and B. F. Skinner", distributed by me, through Boston University students, one Indian and one American, to people going in to hear B. F. Skinner at Boston University in February 1984 and, later, elsewhere, I showed how U. S. universities function as a crime syndicate, in a close relationship with the U. S. government and media. People who they gave the pamphlet to, many of whom knew what was in it, demanded with hostility, from the Indian "Then why are you here?" and he stopped distributing it, though the American continued. The Indian then came to me where I was watching the distribution from a distance and demanded back his telephone number he had given me and I gave it back to him. I have referred above (addendum dated April 16, 2009) about Bush telling Jaswant Singh about “the immense talent of Indians [meaning myself] and the immense wealth [they] have given” to the U.S. (see my letter dated April 13, 2001 in http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 and letters about stock market manipulation). I was watching, on television at Boston University -- I did not have a television -- the movement of stock market indices showing the manipulation of the stock markets by the U. S. Treasury -- the kind of thing to take advantage of which the U. S. Treasury Secretary left his job and went to Wall Street, as I describe in the addendum dated April 16 '09 above -- when the C. I. A. sent a campus policeman to stop my monitoring of the stock market. As the Indian government, under direction of C. I. A.-RAW, regularly does, Boston University then started regularly inviting Amartya Sen to give distinguished lectures at Boston University; this is their way of providing cover for crimes against me and against India.

When I was living in an M. I. T. library, that used to be open 24-hours, for six and a half months, sleeping on the chairs at night and going without food for up to three weeks at a time, all the Indian graduate students were aware of what was happening. The head of the Indian organisation at M. I. T. asked me, "Racism?". I said 'Yes' and he told me not to bother returning a dime he had lent me to make a telephone call. This was the extent of the solidarity they showed toward me. A Tamil Indian visiting M. I. T. from an Indian university and nearing completion of his Ph.D. in Chemistry paid me $5 a week to teach him philosophy of science once a week, while I lived in that library, which I used to buy puffed rice as food for a while -- not nearly enough to prevent considerable loss of weight -- but then started talking about "discrimination" against Tamils in India and stopped. I was down to about half my normal weight from starvation. All the Indians at M. I. T. were aware of what was happening and one exclaimed to me on the street "You have lost a lot of weight!" C. I. A.-RAW sent an official from the Indian Ministry of Science and Technology to reassure them that the Indian government cares about them. When I later took shelter in the Iranian graduate student's dormitory suite as his guest, referred to above, I was similarly starving and an Indian graduate student who also lived in the suite would bring his Indian friends over for coffee and say to them, in Hindi (he was Hindi-speaking), for my benefit (he never spoke to me directly), 'If you start talking like that, the C. I. A. gets after you!' (I had never mentioned the C. I. A. to any one till then; the Indians must have figured it out themselves) but knowing that the C. I. A. was after me and I was starving did not stop this Indian from falsely accusing me of stealing a handful of cereal, at which an M. I. T. policeman said to them, questioningly, "If he is stealing things, we will lock him up!", seeking their acquiescence in locking me up; they remained silent and I was spared, merely forced out in the street. (I had stood first amongst all branches of engineering in the merit-ranking exam at I. I. T., Kharagpur, the 'M. I. T. of India', in 1961, won first prizes in the annual English debating, Hindi debating, English essay and General Knowledge contests in 1964, the only year I took part in these contests, was elected president of the departmental society in my final year and nominated by the department chairman for the Best Graduate of the Institute award).

The crimes against me by this crime syndicate are fully reflected in crimes against India as a whole. In the published letter I referred to in the addendum dated April 11, 2009 above, I said that India has to stop sending students abroad to end the phenomenon of "inferior, seditious" Indians going crazy at a hint of a smile from the White Master. Indian universities will not improve unless this is stopped and the money India spends in foreign exchange every year on sending students abroad is instead spent in rupees -- even more, much more, can be spent in rupees -- and ploughed into Indian universities instead. See what I have said below, in the press release dated November 8, 2008 and the letter dated January 5, 2004 about what Indian higher education and research should be. The Soviet Union had dozens of closed cities -- entire cities -- dedicated to research and development whose very existence was a secret. I have said in the letter dated January 5, 2004 below that Indian scientists can form research communities by themselves and the results of their work need not be shared with the outside world.

There is a hoary tradition in the United States of crime syndicates controlling and, in many cases, appointing judges. There have been judges, including Federal judges, who have been impeached and removed because of their connections to crime syndicates; I sent friend-of-the-court briefs in the cases of two such Federal judges who were removed in recent years because of their connections to crime syndicates. Often they are prosecuted on the grounds of some trivial infraction such as a minor error made by his tax preparer in preparing his income tax return in the case of one of these judges, but everyone concerned knows what the real reason for the prosecution and impeachment is. Since Harvard University professors rule the United States, its power of appointing judges to cover or abet its crimes is extraordinary. It appointed the current Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts to cover up and abet its crimes against me; a banner headline in the Indian newspaper in New York whose Editor-Publisher was jailed for several years for carrying stories about the crimes against me had referred to my intention to sue Harvard University for its entire endowment -- which at the time stood at five billion dollars -- for the crimes against me. The current Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts is the wife of a New York Times columnist my letter to whom, ending with 'I am writing to ask that you use your column to bring these crimes by your countrymen against an Indian scientist and what it shows about the fraud and crime, with genocidal intent, collectively practised by Americans against India and perhaps other countries to light', was the last page of the pamphlet referred to above. As Harvard University has done regarding many other people who come to know about the crimes against me -- see the example of the Japanese academic above whose book was published by Harvard University Press as a bribe which completely changed his behavior -- the wife of the columnist was first made the chief lawyer of Harvard University and then Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. She showed her judicial impartiality recently by dismissing a case I had filed against a Harvard professor for making me blind for two years -- in a way that shocked his colleagues who repeatedly urged me to sue him -- by referring to the defendant as 'Dr. so-and-so' and to me, the Plaintiff, simply as "Chandra" in the judgment.

By controlling the C.I.A., this crime syndicate controls India's RAW and, by controlling RAW, it controls India's courts; one example of this was India's Supreme Court claiming to have lost a case I filed after acknowledging it at the highest level, the crime about which the Indian newspaper in New York -- whose Editor-Publisher was jailed for several years for carrying stories about me -- had carried another lead report on the front page.

There are other examples of Indian courts covering up the crimes against me, one of which involved a BJP politician having been jailed for a long time for having in his possession a copy of a telegram I had sent to the Thakkar Commission of Inquiry -- which went into the assassination of Indira Gandhi -- in response to the Commission's letters to me, copies of which telegram I had sent in a press release to all the major press organs and political parties, a front page report in an English newspaper published in Delhi featuring a full-size photograph of that press release, etc. The jailing of the BJP politician was meant to intimidate all politicians, as well as media, against doing anything that would expose the crimes against me. The politician was arrested on the grounds of having in his possession classified material -- that is, my press release containing my telegram to the Thakkar Commission -- and the front page report in the Delhi newspaper featuring a large reproduction of my press release, containing a large reproduction of my telegram -- was used to secure the politician's release by showing that the press release could not have been classified material since that Delhi newspaper carried a front page report containing a large, fully legible, reproduction of the press release containing a large, fully legible reproduction of the telegram. But the jailing of that BJP politician for a long time -- like the torture-murder of the muslim newspaper cartoonist I have referred to below -- served the purpose of intimidating everyone concerned against doing anything that might expose the C.I.A.-RAW's crimes against me. There are many such examples.

The New York Times columnist, the (above) Chief Justice's husband, is most proud of his book 'Gideon's Trumpet' expressing his profound respect for the judiciary and this was a frequent theme of his columns. There could not have been a more effective bribe than to make his wife Chief Justice whom he presumably fucks -- yes, this four-letter word, which I have never used in the past and do not plan to in the future, is now a regular feature in stories in respected American magazines such as The New Yorker. Arundhati Roy, whose pornographic novel got her the Booker Prize and fame and status in India as well, uses this word as I saw when I happened to glance at a couple lines she had written. It was Hitler who said something to the effect that jews are like an acid that dissolves civilisation. With their control of the U. S. media, including Hollywood, they have turned the American culture as a whole into such an acid. U. S. conservative Jerry Falwell once said "God Almighty does not hear the prayer of a jew" and William F. Buckley's (above) magazine, National Review, quoted "preacher" Jerry Falwell's "chilling remark" that "If God allows America to continue, he will owe an apology to Sodom and Gomorrah". But after bribery of contact, visits to Israel, etc., Falwell became a vocal supporter of Israel. When I wrote my letter in 'Patriot' referred to above (which said 'The so-called pogroms against the jews were the occasional backlash'), the jewish New York Times carried a front page report of another conservative American, Ralph Reed, expressing his opposition to "pogroms" (there have been no pogroms for quite some time now; he said this for my benefit at the request of the jews).

When I said above that the C. I. A.'s agenda is to steal my work without giving me credit, it includes many stray remarks of mine. When Bill Clinton as president was facing impeachment and removal from office for having an affair with a White House intern, Monica Lewinsky, an American said how this offended "the American people". At that I said, in the presence of dozens of Americans, "The American people will impeach a president who does not have extra-marital affairs". There was utter silence. I added after a few seconds "No one could accuse Nixon of having exta-marital affairs. He was the one who came closest to being impeached". The C. I. A. communicated these remarks to U. S. legislators. All U. S. legislators knew of what the C. I. A. was doing to me and my remarks decided Clinton's fate in his impeachment and trial by U. S. legislators. Later, I said to an American that I saw a photograph of Monica Lewinsky in the New York Times and said "She is not at all attractive. A president can do better than that!" and added "How about chivalry -- she was coming on strong; he felt he had to respond" At this the New York Times reported Clinton said he was 'helping' her. The U. S. legislators then embarked on an examination of the minute details of what Clinton and Lewinsky respectively did. An American was saying in my presence, for my benefit, how going into exactly what Monica Lewinsky did and what Clinton did was important. I said "The sole purpose of this whole thing is to talk about sexual things in public". Clinton was acquitted. He was later reported as saying 'Someone was needed to say the whole thing was [a load of crap].' When I made a negative post on my blog, which also appears on the Times of India blogs website though it is not up to date there, about the United States, K. Subrahmanyam left a comment using the name of Bill Clinton expressing astonishment. Then I realised it was Bill Clinton who had nominated me for inclusion in Who's Who In America. When Vajpayee as prime minister visited Bill Clinton as president, Clinton told him only an Indian's remarks could have saved him from being removed from office. I have referred above to Bush as president telling Jaswant Singh about "the immense talent of Indians [meaning myself] and the immense wealth they have given" to the U. S. It was to steal credit for such respect for India I had brought, without giving me credit -- according to the C. I. A.'s agenda -- that Vajpayee coined the slogan "India Shining" for the 2004 elections. After the 1998 nuclear tests, the Vajpayee government issued "Resurgent India Bonds" and in a letter to the press I referred to 'Resurgent India begging a demon king to "allow" it to arm itself while the Indian responsible for the resurgence (see above) cannot find a place to live and work in India'. Upon my reference to Clinton as a king, demon or not, the hue and cry and the impeachment proceedings against him vanished overnight because a king, after all, is entitled to his pleasures; news photos showed Hillary Clinton with a downcast look while other news photos showed Bill Clinton's aides beaming at the new Clinton reborn as a king and the New York Times commented 'remeber what it was like yesterday (regarding the impeachment hue and cry) and what it's like today!' Some other remark of mine later on revived the proceedings. The Americans have given a new meaning to Milton's (in "On His Blindness") "His state is kingly. Thousands at his bidding speed over land and oceans". Advani recently said that Vajpayee can "comprehend" everything but cannot speak or communicate, so Vajpayee does not have to answer questions about his participation in the C. I. A.'s crimes against me. But if these two are tortured, they will both admit Vajpayee can speak and communicate just like in the past.

Does the media black out by RAW of news about the greatest living Indian -- India's natural ruler -- affect elections? Absolutely. Does the dictatorial power the Election Commission has to order the government about any thing that affects elections apply to this? Absolutely. Can the Election Commission halt the elections till this media black out is lifted and the Indian public properly informed about what and who is being suppressed? Absolutely.

ADDED ON MAY 3, 2009: The following E-Mail has been sent to the Election Commission, New Delhi, today:-

Date: May 3, 2009
From: Satish Chandra
Telephone: 01-617-282-4996
FAX: 01-617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra24@hotmail.com
To: Members of the Election Commission, New Delhi
C/O feedback@eci.gov.in, ashishs@eci.gov.in, kakumar@eci.gov.in, rksrivastava@eci.gov.in, kfwilfred@eci.gov.in, ystandhope@eci.gov.in, skrudola@eci.gov.in, jaipriye@eci.gov.in, balakrish@eci.gov.in, dralokshukla@eci.gov.in
Dear Sirs:
With reference to the last paragraph of the addendum dated May 1, 2009 below: this is to request that the Election Commission take the action suggested therein.
Sincerely,
Satish Chandra

CC: Major Indian media organs

----------------------------------------------------------
I have referred above to saying "No one could accuse Nixon of having extra-marital affairs. He was the one who came closest to being impeached". Before that I said to an American "JFK [John F. Kennedy] used to share mistresses with mafia bosses. "He was a handsome guy. He was entitled to it" -- this was a librarian. It's so ridiculous". When I ran for the Lok Sabha in 1996 from East Delhi, a woman referred to my face ["chehra"] as the reason she will vote for me. Americans who wanted me to mate with their wives or offered me their teen-age daughters referred to "how handsome" I was, as did some Americans who did not try to have me mate with their wives. An Indian woman in Detroit said about an Indian woman friend of hers "She thought you are extreeeeeeeeeeeeeeemely handsome". Growing up my handsomeness was kept a carefully guarded secret from me and it has never been a part of my self-concept and I do not see anything remarkable when I look in the mirror. In a course on measurement of intelligence in a doctoral program in clinical psychology, I volunteered to take an IQ test while the rest of the class scored my answers. A class-mate told me after the test that the IQ scale does not go high enough to score my IQ. The professor of another course, in psychotherapy, in the same program, in 1971-72, said to me, standing outside the classroom, "There are TWO things"; only recently I have realised he was giving an explanation of the extraordinary aggression I evoke from people -- some examples of which occurred in that classroom -- and the two things were my intelligence and my handsomeness. At Harvard, the people who referred to my being a "genius" and "extreeeeeeeeeeeeeemely" intelligent also set up the physical assault and numerous other crimes against me. Apparently the rare combination of extreme intelligence and extreme handsomeness evokes aggression like a red rag from a bull. Such a person ought to be provided with security (above) for this reason alone. But I am also India's only hope and the saviour of mankind. See what I said above, on March 20, 2009, about India's classical culture. Some Americans who have known me figured out Indians are "Greek" based on just my looks. My caller I.D. once showed a call from the cell phone of America's biggest movie and media mughal; perhaps he wanted to profit from my handsomeness. But India has been denied profiting from me, except for India's repeatedly aborted strategic program and Vajpayee's fraudulent claim of "India Shining", though I was born in India. It is the Dravidian blood in Indians that is responsible for this. It is not too late for Indians to come to their senses. They must not let the Dravidians amongst them, such as traitor K. Subrahmanyam who burns with envy and jealousy of an Aryan North Indian, destroy India. A popular name for males in India for thousands of years has been "Shyam Sunder", which literally translates as "Dark Beautiful" -- the source of the American slogan from the 1960's "Black is beautiful". An American woman guide showing medieval Indian paintings to visitors to a Harvard museum would have liked to explain how very dark-skinned heroes such as Krishna were shown cavorting with very light-skinned gopis as a matter of deliberate social engineering, but was prevented by my presence in the group from doing so. India has been subject to this and other propaganda such as pacifism for thousands of years which served a purpose once but now has become self-destructive.

After the IQ test above after which a non-jewish classmate told me the IQ scale does not go high enough to score my IQ, the jewish professor of that course who got his Ph.D. in Psychology under the jew at Harvard who later physically assaulted me in a Harvard seminar (see above), said to me my performance in the IQ test was due to my having been a "Math major". If the IQ score were so strongly affected by what subjects one studied in college, IQ tests will have absolutely no validity or utility. A jew, Herrnstein, in the Harvard psychology department, who got his Ph.D. under Skinner and was among those who participated in the crimes against me at Harvard, was famous for his books and articles (such as "IQ in the Meritocracy") on the great utility and validity of IQ tests which, incidentally, showed the intelligence of blacks to be inferior to that of whites. Skinner, who referred to my "deep, deep understanding" of his position, said this to me about Herrnstein's scholarship: "He was my STUDENT for (x) years, he has been my COLLEAGUE for (y) years and he still misunderstands me!" (After, in a letter to National Review, I referred to Herrnstein being "intellectually third rate", Herrnstein quickly got lung cancer which progressed very fast and he died; certain kinds of stress affects the immune system in specific ways. Similarly, when a reporter for the Indian newspaper in New York I have mentioned above called Skinner to ask questions about my case, Skinner's cancer of the mouth flared up and he quickly died). In the psychotherapy course above, the jewish professor who told me "There are TWO things" as the explanation for the extraordinary aggression I evoke later sent a campus policeman who accosted me outside the men's washroom and demanded I come with him to the police post. I insisted he tell me what it is about. Then he said he checked the registration of my car with the state authority and it is not in their computer. I showed him the registration card I had in my wallet and said 'Tell them to check their computer again'. The idea was to take me to the police station to rough me up or do some other injury on the pretext of this fraudulent 'reason'. A non-jewish professor who had just gone into the washroom during this said later "Satish, the fuzz [slang for police] got you!" I told him what happened and he said "It is normal". Later, that jewish professor of psychotherapy apparently said something in the regular faculty meeting which told this non-jewish professor it was that professor of psychotherapy who had sent the policeman to rough me up, or do worse. I got an 'A' in that course in psychotherapy, one of only two 'A's awarded in that course. A jewish classmate got an 'F' (Fail) and came and complained to me. I said "That's absurd! What is he trying to do?! ... He is trying to get attention; just ignore it". When people in the class were asked to vote as to whose client will get better and whose will not, only mine was predicted to get better. My jewish classmate who got a failing grade in that course in individual psychotherapy got his Ph.D. in clinical psychology in three years. I did not get it even after six years, though I had already published a paper about which the journal editor wrote me "Heartiest congratulations on what I regard to be a major contribution to work in the field", about which B. F. Skinner, voted by American psychology department chairpersons as the most influential living psychologist and, along with Freud, one of the two most influential psychologists of all time, had written to me "...want to tell you, while the spell is on me, how much I admire what you have done. You have made a much more courageous use of the autoclitic and atomic operant than I did, with breath-taking results ... Seldom have I read a paper that seemed to me to contain so much that was new and forward moving ...", a paper which had an impact such as no single paper in the history of psychology has ever had (see my letter dated April 28, 2006 to the press below about what happened in a question and answer session of Skinner with thousands of his followers in the Grand ballroom of the Hilton Hotel in Chicago in May, 1977). That paper sent waves of sensation in that psychology department right after I wrote and submitted it as part of the requirements for my Ph.D. and an elderly jewish professor in the department, who had been Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at the university and his younger non-jewish colleague -- who were co-instructors of a course I had taken earlier -- got multi-colored striped pants identical to the ones I wore and sort of followed me around for a couple of days. Even before I wrote that paper, a letter from me was considered decisive as to which faculty member got tenure and which did not and young faculty members up for tenure would try to butter me up -- one showed me a book in his hand and pointedly told me it was a book in philosophy, because it was known I had an interest in philosophy ---and actively solicited letters from me to the committee that decided on tenure. I wrote a letter to the tenure committee in favor of a faculty member who had not a ghost of a chance of getting tenure or having his contract renewed. The chairman of the tenure committee told me of his numerous shortcomings -- he comes late, he is this, he is that; I did not budge and he got his contract renewed over the opposition of everyone. I knew the kind of upheaval that paper of mine will cause and I waited two years before sending it for publication. The Editor of the first and only journal I sent it to called me with profound emotion about a day after he received it -- I cannot reproduce the things he said -- and then wrote to me "Heartiest congratulations on what I regard to be a major contribution to work in the field". When I told an Indian post-doctoral fellow in Physics at the university whom I knew about the editor's call, he said to me in Hindi "Dar rahe the" (You were scared!") regarding the delay in my sending it for publication. I replied it was "Due caution" on my part (because I knew the upheaval it will cause and I had told other Indians, right after I wrote it, it will change the course of the history of psychology). Later events showed that my caution was fully justified. After I had written that paper, when I said to a professor in that department that my notes, etc., I had used to write that paper were in a "box", he said "Don't open that box, or you will have to do it without the Ph.D." (after this paper I was saying I will expand it to book length and the chairman of my program committee had suggested I write a series of papers -- an outline of which was in the paper I had written -- for the number one journal in the field of psychology; he was the one who was being denied contract renewal but got it because of my letter despite everyone's opposition). This professor also told me of their program of slavery for me -- that I will not be given the Ph.D., will have to write a dozen or so papers for which they -- the faculty -- will take credit, not me and eventually, perhaps, get the Ph.D. several years after the years I had already spent in that doctoral program in Psychology. Numerous calls from psychologists around the world who had read my paper calling to invite me to speak, etc. were kept from me, as was most of my mail and, as part of the conspiracy, the behavior of faculty members toward me quickly became very brutal and violent. A faculty member put a note in my mailbox "You cannot fire us. Slaves must be sold".

During my first year in that doctoral program in clinical psychology, an American woman who was a practitioner of an Indian meditative discipline, apparently came seeking help. My classmate who told me the IQ scale does not go high enough to score my IQ sent her to me thinking I will be able to help her. But I knew nothing about that meditative discipline. Another classmate of mine -- who complained to me about being given a failing grade in the course in individual psychotherapy -- was himself a practitioner of that discipline, having learnt it formally, and sent me to a psychologist at the Veterans Administration hospital, where he was interning, who was a practitioner of that meditative discipline and this psychologist, whose original specialty was physiological psychology, taught me how to meditate in an informal, two hour session. When I told this woman, who was a formal teacher of this discipline with the organization whose trade mark this form of meditation was and had been directed to me by my classmate, about having been taught it by the psychologist at the Veterans Administration hospital informally without going through the formal procedure, paying the fee, etc., she went and chastised that psychologist for breaking the rules. In a course in the History of Psychology -- which had not a trace, a whisper or a hint of India having contributed anything to the field of psychology -- each student had to choose a topic, from a list provided, to give a presentation to the class. I chose the topic "The Self". I thought it will be good if I gave a presentation focusing on India's treatment of the concept of 'Self' -- because my classmate sending that woman to me and another classmate sending me to the psychologist at Veterans Administration hospital made me think this was something expected and welcome from me -- on which a LOT of work has been done in India throughout history (see letter dated April 1, 2005 below), quite secular work, not referring to religion -- and by people such as Swiss psychologist Carl Jung, one of the greatest names in psychology, who has extensively written, over many volumes, about India's treatment of the concept of The Self. I got thirteen books in English from the University's main library on India's treatment of the concept of The Self by Americans and some Indians, not Europeans, and studied them to prepare for the presentation. About 8 P.M. the evening before the presentation, I decided I was not ready to give a presentation on the Indian concept of 'Self' and prepared a presentation based strictly on the work in mainstream American social psychology which has absolutely nothing in common with India's treatment of 'Self', for which I also had materials on hand. This was 1971-72 and during the India-Pakistan war that year, the campus newspaper had carried a cartoon by a Washington Post cartoonist showing emaciated Indians with begging bowls next to tanks and artillery, making fun of the poor, starving Indians engaging in activity such as warfare. In defence of both India and Pakistan I wrote a letter, which appeared both in the Washington Post and the campus newspaper, in response to that cartoon saying, in part, something like the following: 'They are fighting over real estate and over issues that touch human beings in their core, such as religion ... Compare the frivolous reasons which led to World War I and the megalomania that was responsible for World War II ...' and, at the end, referred to 'ignoring the very reasons that give rise to war'. This letter defending both India and Pakistan for their temerity in engaging in an activity such as war was taken by the jews as an excuse to throw me out of the department; the non-jewish classmate above told me "they [meaning the jews or faculty members] are going to throw you out". I replied "Are you kidding? I am their favorite student. I will see you in class". For any Indian who wants to be allowed to 'succeed' in the United States, it is absolutely essential that he participate in the Americans' running India down as a poor, starving, backward country. The Indian named Vinod Gupta (above), from my residence hall at IIT, Kharagpur, worth hundreds of millions of dollars who was made a bosom pal of both the Indian president and of Bill Clinton as president as part of moves to isolate me, says about his family in India "Sometimes we did not have FOOD", though I know he is from a U.P. bania family and never had to starve. I had written to a Harvard professor of Political Science who had been the United States' National Security Adviser, about what happened to me at Harvard, after which he began bringing Indian graduate students to his department, among them Fareed Zakaria who was catapulted to editorship of the prestigious Foreign Affairs magazine and one of them -- who was made Editor of the prestigious Foreign Affairs magazine, principal organ of the Council on Foreign Relations and then Editor of the international edition of Newsweek and was given their annual award by South Asian journalists in the U.S. and of whom his jewish mentor from the New York Times said he wants to see him the National Security Advisor of the United States -- when he came to be interviewed on a Boston radio station, the first thing he said about India was "First of all, it is very POOR". Make no mistake about it, when Amartya Sen was chosen as the inferior Indian substitute for me for a Nobel prize, it was because the work for which he was given the Nobel prize carries the theme of starvation and famine in India. As for the validity of his thesis, see what I have written above about my starving in the M.I.T. library with the fullest knowledge and participation of all the Indians at M.I.T. and of the Indian and American governments as well as of Amartya Sen later who was brought to Harvard in an operation orchestrated by a prominent jewish professor of Philosophy at Harvard after I gave him a copy of my pamphlet referred to above and later given the Nobel prize under an arrangement with the jews made during a visit by Jethmalani to Israel when he was in Vajpayee's cabinet; as I have said elsewhere, Jethmalani himself was given a law practice of half a million dollars per year for participation in crimes against me. When Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal was chosen to give the Republican party response to Obama's State of the Union address, the only thing he said about his Indian background was "I have seen extreme poverty in India". These are just examples, which illustrate a rule. So my defence of India and Pakistan for their temerity in engaging in activity such as war was taken by the jews as an excuse to throw me out of the department (it was not because of any opposition to war; Skinner contributed to the war effort in World War II by developing a missile guidance system using pigeons and this military work had continued at the lab in Cambridge which also developed the guidance systems for America's moon missions at least till 1980 when someone working on it told me about it), which they wanted to do because I seemed a threat to their control of the field. The professor of this course in the History of Psychology was jewish and this non-jewish classmate had signaled his acquiescence in the jews' throwing me out by something I will not go into. When I finished my presentation, this professor began asking questions in a brutalising tone and voice that can only be used toward a slave and answering which would have established me as a slave; it was meant to drive me out of the department but I did not oblige. The note a non-jewish faculty member left in my mail box three years later saying "Slaves must be sold" referred to that.

ADDED ON MAY 5, 2009: A response to the above is the following which I have copied and pasted as it appears in a blog where people who also read the Bharat-Rashak online forum write; the "forum" referred to in it is the Bharat-Rakshak forum:-

"I agree with ralphy broadly . Though a news program showed that the polling percentage in dharavi was less than even the more affluent areas.
On a different note some people in the forum guffawed about an african space program.Now this kind of thing just won't do. In the process of development we should not become like the west in our outlook. africa has a legitimate right to a space program and I look forward to a day when they will land people on the moon! Power to africa!and uber rakshaks please stop behaving like the goras that you so profer to despise.
this is why when NRIs get rogered in the west , I tend to look the other way.
remember after India , africa is the future. here I would refer to adam smith and his wealth of nations.
11:18 PM"

When he refers to 'NRIs getting rogered in the West', he is referring to what I have written above about my experiences. He lives in Delhi and apparently works for the Indian government because he referred to having been present in a signing ceremony with Kakodkar, etc., regarding the nuclear deal.

In an article, titled "Crime In Psychology and the I.Q. Matter" that I published in a black-owned Florida newspaper almost twenty years ago (no white-owned newspaper, in the Boston area or elsewhere, would publish such an article), which described some of my experiences I have described above, I pointed to the bias against blacks in I.Q. tests by pointing to an item, as an example, in an I.Q. test which requires that a face with Negroid features be judged as less attractive than a Caucasian face for the answer to be correct. When I refer to the jews' motivation being maintaining control over the field of psychology, I have often made the point that it is psychologists and psychological tests, etc., who pass judgment on the relative intelligence and other characteristics, such as criminality (behavior genetics has also been used for this purpose), of various ethnic and racial groups and jews have been in the forefront of asserting the intellectual and moral inferiority (such as 'criminality') of dark-skinned people which is used to justify discrimination against and mistreatment of them. In that article I made the point that my mistreatment occurred despite my intelligence being superior to their own even by their own tests, despite the disadvantage of taking the tests 'in what is a foreign language to me -- English'. The jewish faculty member who tried to explain away my performance on the I.Q. test (above) by saying I had been a 'math major', also went to Africa to get evidence on the inferiority of black people in the matter of intelligence, etc., as I mentioned in that article in the Florida newspaper. The jew at Harvard, under whom he got his Ph.D., who physically assaulted me when I said "I don't think conservation is a useful concept" was presenting the results of an experiment that showed the inferiority of the intelligence of dark-skinned people in Latin America. After the assault, Skinner's jewish assistant, who had set up that pre-planned assault by suggesting I sit near the head of that long seminar table near the professor (after that assault, I had stopped going to that seminar and another jewish professor, who had planned to similarly assault me and was spring-loaded to do so, lunged toward me as I passed near him in the library, since he could not do so in the seminar which I was no longer attending; a female jewish first year graduate student, also in that seminar, similarly lunged at me intimidatingly with a loud exclamation when I pointedly referred to that jew, who had assaulted me, as 'Mister so-and-so' during an exchange with her near where I had a desk; in a meeting with Skinner after that assault in the seminar, I referred to it as "Attempt to intimidate me! Attempt to intimidate me!"; it was in that meeting that Skinner said, "This department is second rate ... Lucky to have you here"; but Skinner himself had tried to degrade and intimidate me -- though not torture me as that jew did -- when, in May, 1976, at a convention of the Association of Behavior Analysis, the organization of thousands of 'behaviorist' psychologists, I approached him -- my paper in BEHAVIORISM had already been written and prepublication copies sent to many psychologists, including Skinner -- "May I shake your hand, Sir; I am Satish Chandra ..." and, after asking which of his books he considered the most important, etc., asked "Would it be correct to say that you used Bacon's method in arriving at the categories in 'Verbal Behavior' ?"-- an innocuous question with no hostile intent, in a way I will not go into and with deliberation I kept stepping back for safety while looking at him as he continued speaking), made a faux 'defence' of dark-skinned people against the charge of inherently inferior intelligence by saying it could be due to the practice of "endogamy" at which the jewish professor who made the assault grinned at "a variable such as endogamy" (which provided a sort of 'environmental' explanation -- social environment in this case -- as an alternative because endogamy results in genetic deterioration). (Note also what I have said above about the problems with the concept of "genes' as it exists).

In that seminar, when I was assaulted, there were present two other senior members of the faculty, one jew and the other a non-jew. Before I went to Harvard, I had already received that letter from Skinner saying "How much I admire what you have done... Seldom have I read a paper that seemed to me to contain so much that was new and forward moving...", etc., and Skinner had already suffered that VERY angry confrontation by his own followers in the Grand Ballroom of the Hilton Hotel in Chicago, shouting "SATISH CHANDRA HAS SHOWN ... ", etc. that I have described above and below; that man was expressing the anger against him that was present in his followers and in the convention as a whole, because of my paper, for the monumental fraud he had perpetrated on them and on the world. Before I came to Harvard, I had written to Harvard's Dean, who had sent me the letter of admission, enclosing, in addition to a copy of that letter to me from Skinner, a copy of a letter to me from Herrnstein saying "I am impressed by the material you sent...", etc who had suggested I complete the Ph.D. at the university I was at and come to Harvard as a post-doc. I had already done ten years of graduate work, six years of that in psychology, had already made "a major contribution to work in the field", not to mention what Skinner had written to me, had done all the course work and completed other requirements for the Ph.D., but had been told by the faculty there of the program of slavery they had for me under which they will not allow me to get the Ph.D., I will have to write many more papers, for which they will take the credit, not me, etc. and they had 'dissolved' my program and program committee to force me to beg faculty members to be on a new program committee, get their approval for a new program, etc. under which I could be made to labor many more years, for THEIR benefit, without getting the Ph.D.; in my letter to Harvard's Dean, I wrote "I wonder if it is possible to arrange for me a status and level of support in consonance with my work". In response, I got a letter from the admissions officer saying "I am sorry to inform you that additional support will not be possible" and "May I congratulate you on your recent work and wish you continued success. We look forward to your arrival here in the Fall". At Harvard, I met Skinner who refused to do anything and said I should "truckle" (which means 'bow obsequiously'). Lacking any alternative, I registered for two courses of discussion with Skinner, that seminar which was required for all first year graduate students and, at Skinner's suggestion, a course in the history of psychology (I had already had a course in the history of psychology at the other university and my paper in BEHAVIORISM had CHANGED the course of the history of psychology). I considered my relationship with Skinner to be defined by that letter which began with "Dear Dr. Chandra ...". Skinner's assistant told me Skinner has been "constrained to treat you as a student" by the department. In fact things are very flexible in academia; not long ago, the chairman of the Psychology department at Boston's Northeastern University had a Master's degree in psychology, not a doctorate; I also had a non-terminal Master's in psychology, though I had done all the work and more for a Ph.D. When I was at the University of Rochester, the president of the university, a statistician, had a Master's degree in statistics, not a Ph.D. The jewish faculty member, who was present in that seminar when the other jew made that assault, had come into the class earlier when it was his turn to make a presentation, saying "Are there any foreign students here?" I kept silent but Skinner's assistant pointed a finger at me, though there were several graduate students from other countries in the seminar, including from Canada and Australia. Then I raised my hand. This jewish faculty member then said he asked that so he can speak English slowly and clearly for my benefit. The non-jew who was present in the seminar when the assault on me occurred, was a member of the National Academy of Science -- an honor only distinguished scientists receive; Skinner was its member, though Skinner was the only one in the department who had received the National Medal of Science, the highest U. S. governmental recognition for scientists given by the president of the country in a White House ceremony -- and a mathematical psychologist and, because of my background in engineering, etc. (by the way, some one with a bachelor's degree in engineering makes more money than someone with a Ph.D. in psychology; I had gone into psychology because of an intellectual interest, not as a way of making a living; clinical psychologists, with a Ph.D., have a lower status and required to work under medical doctors -- something that shocked and dismayed me when I learnt of it after going into the doctoral program in clinical psycholgy; in India, someone with a Bachelor's degree in engineering has the same status as a medical doctor with an M.B.B.S. I already had an engineering degree from I.I.T., Kharagpur; a Ph.D. in psychology would have been a step down, not up, for me careerwise; I persisted with it because, as I have said below, even our knowledge of the physical world comes to us through our senses and, so, in a sense a science of psychology is the foundation science of all sciences; effectively, it is experimental philosophy and doctoral degrees in all fields are 'Doctor of Philosophy'; in a doctoral program in Electrical Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign which was ranked among the top four doctoral programs in the United States and had a Nobel laureate in the department, I had passed the Ph.D. Qualifying Exam; I had an interest in artificial intelligence, and studying logic, that is used in the design of computers, etc., in which I was co-instructor with another graduate student at Carnegie-Mellon University for a senior and graduate level course, I saw that the human cognitive processes were involved in logic also; as I have said below in the letter dated April 1, 2005, the world and its physical properties are constructed by our perception and thus psychology is the foundation science even of Physics; my rat experiment I have referred to above has implications for Physics as it does for Biology and Medicine; I had gone into clinical psychology because there you can see psychological theories at work and the proof of how good a theory is is in the pudding; going to psychology from engineering seemed too big a leap and I spent two years in an MBA program, choosing a field of concentration which was named "Behavior Science In Industry", as a bridge) this mathematical psychologist was hoping to have me work under him. The assault by that jew which, besides torturing me, treated me as a slave, was meant for the benefit of this non-jew faculty member as well because it was meant to make me, by brute force, their slave. Neither of the two senior faculty members, who were present during the assault, said or did anything. When days after the assault I met Skinner and mentioned it to him, I also said I had been "moping around" and expressed my sorrow at my "relationship with the department" because that outrage was committed in the presence not just of all the graduate students in the seminar but of two senior faculty members with the full knowledge that there will be no consequences for the perpetrator of the assault. After that, as I left the tiny room which had been assigned to me as my office in an area where other graduate students had similar offices, I saw this mathematical psychologist approaching my office with the jewish faculty member who had also been present during the assault, apparently to express 'support' to me but I assumed a weepy expression on my face and walked on past them; nothing they could do or say could be recompense for what had occurred which I described, in a letter dated July 27, 1982 to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi as "the equivalent of an annihilatory nuclear first strike on India" (she wrote back she was "passing it on to my Principal Secretary to deal with it"). Skinner's later asking me about "your political contacts -- Mrs. Gandhi?" -- though I had written to her in her capacity as Prime Minister, not a politician and had not breathed a word to anyone about having any such contacts -- and another senior faculty member of the department, in whose course in the history of psychology Skinner suggested I enrol, saying to me that Skinner's theories were being applied to "China" (meaning my references, in letters to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, as a behavior scientist, to what could be done regarding India's development, etc.) showed that people in that department knew not just about my accomplishment in psychology, which Skinner acknowledged in that letter, but as someone who was to India's prime minister and government much more than any of them, including Skinner, or any other American scientist had been to the American president and government, as a Guru and guide (Mrs. Indira Gandhi, after ending the Emergency and losing the election -- with a lot of misunderstanding on her part of the guidance I was providing because of the psychology department people blocking my communications -- said 'There is no truth that someone was guiding her' because Vajpayee and many others knew about the guidance I was providing her); they carried out that pre-planned assault despite knowing who I was and the image that crossed my mind at the time of the assault was that of a salvo of nuclear-armed missiles launched against India. The thought I had in my mind when returning from that seminar to my office after the assault was "The jews have tried to destroy me; I will destroy the jews". But in fact, the AMERICANS had tried to destroy me and I have to destroy the Americans.

The pamphlet, above, that I distributed in February, 1984 to people going in to hear B. F. Skinner at Boston University and, later, elsewhere, began by saying 'Most have heard the suppression of dissenting schools of thought in the USSR by ... the incarceration of dissidents in mental hospitals' and described what happened in the question and answer session Skinner had with his followers in the Grand Ballroom of the Hilton Hotel in Chicago. Before that session, the Editor of BEHAVIORISM had followed me out of a room in which I had just read another paper and, when I mentioned I had heard from Skinner about the paper which appeared in BEHAVIORISM, he asked if Skinner had been "enraged". After the distribution of that pamphlet to people going in to hear Skinner at Boston University in February, 1984, the American student who did the distribution was told by the mathematical psychologist above, who was present when the assault on me in that Harvard seminar occurred and who was now chairman of the Harvard psychology department, that I was a paranoid schizophrenic, that it never happened and I imagined it. At Harvard, Skinner's assistant had demanded that I do a job such as washing dishes in the freshmen's dining hall and added this threat "People are not getting the point! You will either be INSTITUTIONALISED, or DEPORTED, or DEAD". Later Skinner himself suggested I do such jobs. Earlier, Skinner had offered to ease my financial situation by offering me money "from Washington", meaning from the C.I.A. The same paradigm has continued as, for example, when, on August 10 and 11, 2008, K. Subrahmanyam and the C.I.A. Director combined their offer to transfer one crore rupees into my bank account within 48 hours with threats to put me in a mental hospital or in the prison at Guantanamo Bay (see the attachment to this E-mail). When the Indian above says "this is why when NRIs get rogered in the west , I tend to look the other way", he is supporting such treatment of India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, as well as supporting the C.I.A. openly ruling India, as are all other Indians, in government, the media and elsewhere. It is because of such Indians, which includes all politicians, government people, media people and a lot of others, that I have suffered the treatment I have suffered from Americans who have a thoroughly justified contempt for Indians in general who they feel deserve nothing more than to be treated like nigger blackie slaves whose very life and existence is at the mercy of the White Master. Indians are quite happy with that.

What I said above on April 16, 2009 is worth repeating:-

"Of course the Indians, from the top to the bottom, know about the crimes of the jews against me and against India but are willing to be bought and participate in the crimes, cutting India’s and their own throats. Is it their Dravidian genes that makes them so slavish toward the white man? What implications does it have for their future and for mankind, since so long as they are allowed to exist, they will continue to contaminate the gene pool [note that, as I have explained above, they can contaminate the gene pool without any admixture of blood, by mere existence or proximity], even if they provide useful services as the white man’s slaves at present? Does this make them a threat to the future of mankind and fit to be euthanized en masse? There cannot be a more important subject for public discussion. If the ancient Indians’ great achievements were the products of Aryan genes which, with the passage of time, have become so contaminated by Dravidian genes as to make the Indians’ survival more of a threat than benefit to mankind, the ancient Indians’ achievements are no defence against the extermination of the present day Indians. If, on the other hand, the slavish submissiveness of present day Indians toward the white man is good rather than bad for mankind and it is the aggressiveness of the white barbarians which makes the latter a threat to the future of mankind and fit to be exterminated so that the gentle Indians are liberated, it is the Indians that deserve to survive, not the barbarians of Europe."

If it is decided that the Indians do not deserve to be allowed to occupy space on this planet because of the danger they pose to mankind (paragraph above), of course they will have to be euthanised en masse and today's technology makes that possible. Perhaps the Americans and the C.I.A. want ME to make that decision, as to whether to allow the Indians to continue to exist. I would be happy to receive inputs from Indians on this subject.

One of the two Federal judges above, who were being prosecuted for bribery or links to organized crime and in whose cases I sent friend-of-the-court briefs, was black and the other white. In the case of the black judge, I pointed to organized criminal activity in academia, including such as that described above, and referred to attacks on blacks who occupy positions "of rank and dignity" -- such as Federal judgeships. I was glad to see the black Federal judge, who was convicted and removed, run for the U.S. Congress, where he has been for many years now and is a good friend of India.

ADDED ON MAY 6, 2009: Reportedly India and China are seeking land in Africa to grow food. I suggested below India taking control of Australia militarily, for 'lebensraum' (living space) and other purposes. In the addendum dated May 3, 2009 above I have referred to the invalidity of Amartya Sen's thesis as to starvation and famine. I have repeatedly emphasised that nuclear supremacy over the strongest white country is needed as much for economic reasons as any other. As I have explained, the United States is using Indians and Chinese as slave labour. Supremacy in arms -- which means nuclear supremacy -- is vital for every thing, including the maintenance of national integration and the happiness and loyalty of all its citizens.

Many Sikhs came and settled in California as farmers a century ago. There is no reason why India should not aim to take control of California militarily, as the United States invades countries of West Asia/Middle East for its oil. A nuclear first strike with just two twenty kiloton warheads on New York and Washington, accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation, will make this possible along with a lot of other things.

The United States has been trying to break-up countries of the Indian subcontinent for a long time, for its own purposes. India can break-up the United States for its own purposes. The United States subjugates governments around the world including the Indian subcontinent for such purposes. India can and must subjugate the United States, break it up and use it for its own purposes. China has such a vision. India can do it much, much faster with a first strike with just two twenty kiloton warheads on New York and Washington, accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. Tiny England, whom Indians so much admire, took possession of two entire continents -- North America and Australia -- and a lot more, including India, for its people. The Americans trying to enslave me (above) has been part of the same movement of enslaving and exploiting other people; the other Indians are already enslaved and I needed to be enslaved. As I have said below in the press release of November 8, 2008, India must "dominate, rather than be dominated by, the intellectually and morally inferior ‘mlecchas’ of the West and do whatever is necessary to enslave and, if necessary, exterminate them. And it WILL be necessary".

China is planning to take over Texas, which, along with California and Arizona, etc. was once part of Mexico, in collaboration with Mexico. India can plan to use parts of the American South as well, possibly in collaboration with China and Mexico. Ideally the white population of the United States should be pushed into its Northeast and into Canada, which is almost empty and has an area equal to the United States and, climatewise, will suit the whites very well. (Instead of fighting each other, India, Pakistan and other countries of the subcontinent can collaborate in this enterprise). The United States now has a substantial and rapidly growing population of Mexican origin, already its largest minority which insists on keeping its language and culture and links to Mexico. It can be expected to help, though India can do the whole thing all by itself, too.

An article by an Indian 'security expert' in an Indian newspaper is headed "The Missing security expert". There is only one strategic expert India has who is expert and who is not bought up by the Americans. He is missing from India's media. The rest are neither expert nor not bought up.

Of course, he is more than India's only strategic expert. He is father of India's strategic program. He is more than that. He is India's greatest scientist. He is more than that. He is India's only hope for its economic and technological salvation. He is more than that. He is India's sovereign. He is more than that. He is Dispenser of India's Destiny ("Bharat Bhagya Vidhata") who will decide whether Indians should be allowed to occupy space on this planet. See addendum dated November 7, 2008 below for what was said when a Pakistani on Pakistan Defence Forum asked "Is Satish Chandra a defence analyst like Zaid Hamid or something?" (The following post was later deleted by the moderators of that forum):-

"Satish Chandra's biography is in Marquis' Who's Who in America (2008 and earlier editions) and in Who's Who in the World (2009 edition).

There is an expression in Sanskrit "Neti, neti" which means "Not this, not this"; it is applied to God and means that any description of God in particular terms is inadequate/incorrect because no matter how you try to describe Him, God is a lot more than that. Some people (for example, a professor of philosophy at a United States university) have suggested that Satish Chandra is an incarnation of God ("avatar"). He is India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, but he is unknown to the Indian public, for reasons of the kind that are indicated in posts number 21 and 22 of this thread. He has been responsible for India's nuclear weapons and strategic program -- it was a letter of his to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December '82 which resulted in the start of India's Integrated Guided Missiles Program and the Center for Advanced Technology, for example -- but his theory of money was responsible for the "New Economy" that U.S. president Clinton celebrated which, as Clinton's successor Bush told India's Jaswant Singh later on, has brought immense wealth to the United States (see How India's Economy Can Grow 30% Per year Or More ). He is an engineer, a behavior scientist and a lot more; he has more higher education than anyone he knew on the Harvard University faculty (see his web page: Psychotherapy - eBoard ); he is also listed in Who's Who in Science and Engineering and Who's Who in Medicine and Healthcare. As is stated in post # 1 of this thread, he has been the only threat to the continuance of firangi rule over India. He is generally acknowledged to be the most patriotic Indian alive but, as can be seen in the posts at the beginning of this thread, he is going to destroy New Delhi/Delhi with a nuclear explosion ("Neti, neti"). When, after the 1998 nuclear tests by India, Satish Chandra expressed doubts about the loyalty and trustworthiness of Vajpayee, who was prime minister, the control of India's nuclear weapons was taken away from Vajpayee and given to India's president, Narayanan. When prime minister, Vajpayee often referred to Satish Chandra simply as "Pakistan". When Benazir Bhutto was prime minister, she referred to the "game plan being hatched by extra-constitutional forces [meaning Satish Chandra] to come to power [in Pakistan]". When Gen. Musharraf assumed office after his coup, Satish Chandra, in a letter to the press, commented on it and Gen. Musharraf went on television just to say "Let no external forces think that they can take advantage of the prevailing situation". The best way to know about him is to read his blog: Nuclear Supremacy for India over U.S. in its entirety.

By the way, Satish Chandra has said that India's RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A. and has been responsible for almost all of the terrorism in India since 1983; see post # 1 in the thread by Ali.009 in this forum -- http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/16042-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html -- and RAW sends its operatives to post a lot of abuse of Satish Chandra on forums like this."

On the Bharat-Rakshak forum, the agenda of the C.I.A.-RAW operatives who control and moderate it has been to keep the focus of Indians firmly on fighting muslims -- internal or external -- or Chinese and away from fighting the real enemy, the white countries. The same has been the agenda of BJP politicians, including Varun Gandhi. The agenda of C.I.A.-RAW includes keeping members of the Nehru family, including Varun, in the news, through whatever 'controversies', etc. that come handy and keeping the greatest living Indian out of the news and unknown to the Indian public. I had first written to Indira Gandhi when I saw her, as prime minister, being interviewed and brow-beaten by American journalists on a Sunday noon-time television program after she had declared the Emergency, jailed thousands of political opponents, etc. and she tried to deflect the hostility by biting her lip, like a shy girl, at the end of the program, a gesture which the producers made sure to put on the air. One of my letters to her included a reference to "planting trees" -- a program Sanjay Gandhi had initiated during the Emergency -- among several examples of the externally observable things that could be promoted by applying behavioral principles; she had made a reference to something like 'inner strength' as a goal after my earlier letters and I had then made the point that it is better to focus on externally observable forms of behavior and mentioned "planting trees" among several examples of externally observable and measurable forms of behavior that should be focused upon; nothing I wrote suggested or condoned things like forced sterilization. Because of my approving reference to "planting trees", a program initiated by Sanjay, he suddenly became the dictator of India, more powerful than and over-ruling his mother -- whom he later took to slapping in front of others, because with my first letter to Indira Gandhi, I had included a copy of my letter to Skinner in which I referred to "promotion of reverence by the young for the old, the partial stigmatization of wealth and worldly achievement" as examples of characteristics of the Indian culture which promote "stability" versus the Western idea of "progress"; after this Indira Gandhi had started rebuking people who touched her feet. In that first letter to Indira Gandhi, I said 'I have noted with interest your recent statements re limitations of the concept of liberty' and included a paperback copy of Skinner's "Beyond Freedom and Dignity" to enable India's prime minister not to be brow-beaten by American journalists so India's prime minister does not have to bite her lip like a shy girl toward Americans as I saw her do in that television interview. At the time I wrote that first letter to her in 1975, I had had to retreat from that psychology department, going only before seven A.M. once in a couple of weeks to check my mailbox, because of the brutal and violent behavior of faculty members after I had written that paper, described above and their violation of my freedom and dignity before I wrote that first letter to Indira Gandhi; in my letter I mentioned Skinner having been voted the most influential living psychologist and one of the two most influential psychologists of all time by American psychology department chairpersons; in that letter I also said that Skinner's theory of man and his theory of knowledge is "very close to the Indian one" and that "I will be writing a paper on this". I wrote in an account, titled "The Soviet Coup", more than fifteen years later -- which also described that paper of mine being a "coup" which led to Skinner's question and answer session with his followers in which Skinner was 'so to speak, pulled down from his pedestal by his own followers', my starving in that MIT dormitory and almost being jailed after being falsely accused of stealing a handful of cereal (when I mentioned so starving to an American woman I had bought a meal for in a Boston restaurant many years later, she said 'Like in India!') and after receiving which the CBS television network sent me a certified letter, return receipt requested, expressing an interest in doing a 'Sixty Minutes' story on me, to which I did not reply -- that my letters "galvanised her and turned the political tide for her" but "through euphoria and overconfidence of her son, led her to call an election which sent her out of power and facing an inquiry commission for fascistic crimes ...". After she had lost that election and I came to Harvard and met Skinner, he referred to my thinking being "very close" to his and asked me "What is knowledge?" -- perhaps suggesting I write that paper I said in my first letter to Indira Gandhi I will be writing -- U.S. intelligence agencies were keeping him and many others fully informed of my letters to her and racing my letters to her as soon as written, without waiting for delivery by mail -- but I did not oblige. After Sanjay became the dictator of India after and because of my reference to "planting trees" among examples of externally observable forms of behavior, he referred, in a speech in Rajasthan, dismissively to "imported ideologies" -- because of my enclosing a copy of Skinner's "Beyond Freedom and Dignity" to enable his mother, the prime minister, to stand up to the Americans and not degrade India by behaving like a shy girl, biting her lip, toward them. Later, when I was starving in that MIT graduate dormitory and threatened with being 'locked up' (see above) after being falsely accused of stealing a handful of cereal, Sanjay Gandhi died in a crash of his IMPORTED sport plane, engineered by the C.I.A. at his mother's request, because he had taken to slapping her in front of others because of my reference to 'the promotion of reverence by the young for the old' (above) -- as I have described in the letter dated May 11, 2005 below. The "information imperialism" referred to in that letter continues to keep the greatest living Indian unknown to the Indian public.

On July 25, 2008, below, I wrote:-

"Who will be destroyed by the nuclear bomb in New Delhi besides the Laloo Yadavs and Chatterjees (see below)? A bent old man who bent even lower to the Yadavs the day after he recorded the Yadavs, with bags of money, facilitating the invasion of India by firangis and was himself recorded, with folded hands, paying obeisance to the Yadavs. The military and the civil servants who have always been loyal to the firangis (see below). The population of Delhi/New Delhi which, by the hundreds of thousands, stood and watched silently India’s emperor, after surrendering his sword, arrested and led away by a lone Englishman with “fifty black sowars” -- the Englishman sent the Indian emperor’s jewel-encrusted sword to the British monarch -- though, as the Englishman wrote home to England, anyone of them -- his fifty black sowars -- could have brought him down with a single shot.Why did the Indian emperor have to surrender his sword to the lone firangi and submit to being arrested? He had a sword but he lacked supremacy in arms. Today supremacy in arms is nuclear supremacy. No one in Delhi/New Delhi wants nuclear supremacy for India. These are the people who will be destroyed."

Why did India's prime minister have to bite her lip like a shy girl to appease Americans? India's prime minister did not have supremacy in arms. Why did India's greatest scientist have to starve while the Indians at MIT silently watched and some actively collaborated with the Americans in his degradation, like Delhi's population silently watched India's emperor arrested by a lone Englishman and the "fifty black sowars" actively collaborated in it? Because, as in 1858, India does not have supremacy in arms. India's armed forces today are just like those fifty black sowars as are all civil servants, RAW, etc. and the population at large is just like the residents of Delhi in 1858, only worse. Indira Gandhi is considered like "Durga" for taking military action in Bangladesh but in fact she had to go seek permission of the White Master for that and the U.S. president, Nixon, kept her waiting 45 minutes before seeing her.


I have brought India to the point where it can destroy its enemy with just two twenty kiloton warheads delivered to Washington and New York, with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities like Chicago if there is any retaliation and suddenly increase its power millions of times -- despite the treachery of India's prime ministers and the slavishness of the Indian people.

A piece of Indian dog-faeces on Bharat-Rakshak says:-
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lets institute an award for Noam Chomsky's pup.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Another piece of Indian dog-faeces on Bharat-Rakshak replies:-
----------------------------------------------------------------
Arjun wrote:
Lets institute an award for Noam Chomsky's pup.

Saar.. these wannabe **** are not worthy of standing 6 miles from him. They quoute him or use his name to increase their Image/stock in public view.

:self edited:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

As I said about 28 years ago in a letter to the United Nations Secretary General a copy of which I sent to Brajesh Mishra who was then India's ambassador to the U.N., my rat experiment "accomplished in a few hours as much as Skinner did in a life-time of experimentation" and that Skinner's letter to me about the paper in BEHAVIORISM accurately reflected our "relative intellectual and scientific excellence". In fact that rat experiment did more, a lot more than Skinner accomplished in a life time of experimentation. I have never considered Chomsky anything but third rate. Right after writing the paper, in the Spring of 1974, which I later published in the Spring '76 issue of BEHAVIORISM, I said to a member of my program committee that Chomsky "doesn't know the most elementary things" about Skinner's system and how his criticisms of Skinner's system were based on such ignorance and utter lack of understanding. In a subsequent paper also after which the Editor of BEHAVIORISM followed me out of the room where I read it in May, 1977 I showed this about "Chomsky's famous review" of Skinner's 'Verbal Behavior' which was published over 40 years ago and made Chomsky's career. Skinner himself wrote he had started reading that review of 'Verbal Behavior', saw that Chomsky had misunderstood him and "put it aside" and never read it later. After I was ousted from Harvard, Skinner began to butter up Chomsky as well. Around 1980-81 I said to the student who distributed my pamphlet at Boston University later that I thought Skinner had put the C.I.A. on me "to get the evidence on the jews". Chomsky was promoted by the jews to take control of psychology and philosophy, as they did a Canadian jew -- who is fourth rate -- after I was ousted by them from Harvard and from the field. I have referred below to the greatest living Indian's toe nail clippings being worth more to India and the world than the rest of the billion-plus Indians combined. The C.I.A. has been spending at least hundreds of millions of dollars per year for 32 years on suppressing this Indian so they can flush Indians like the pieces of dog-faeces above out to sea.

The behavior of the pieces of dog-faeces above reminds me of an episode in that psychology department. I had signed up for an office in the Psychological Clinic to see a client in. The client was waiting but whoever was using that office during the previous hour had not come out so I could use it. I gently knocked on the door. A female graduate student, one or two years junior to me in the program, came out and said "I am going to clobber you! I am going to clobber you!" I wrote her about a four page letter explaining how my client had had an emergency and it was important for me to see him, that I had knocked with a volume and rhythm calculated not to disturb any state of relaxation her client might be in, etc. and said how I had entertained nothing but positive feelings toward her and had "shown it" -- I had her and a male classmate of hers over for dinner earlier -- and ended "Even now I hold no lasting grudge and will continue to work for good relations, as colleagues if not friends". Apparently that letter of mine to her was known to all the faculty members because, after I had written that paper which I later published in BEHAVIORISM, a member of my program committee said to me "Who's been leaning on you?" then himself added "EVERYBODY!"; he was alluding to her as he had earlier said something to me about her. He listed three or four categories of people who get mistreated because of a lack of power, among them foreigners (there were at least two full professors, both male, in that clinical psychology program who were shorter than me, for those who , such as J. K. Galbraith when alluding to my letter in Patriot referred to above and explaining my encompassing several volumes in one sentence about "Science and other intellectual products" in that letter, appeal to such variables). But a few days later it was this faculty member who said to me "Don't open that box or you will have to do it without the Ph.D." and outlined the program of slavery they had for me. After I had submitted that paper but before anyone had read it, he had referred to me, speaking to me, as a "cockroach" who had escaped being crushed. At Harvard, Skinner said to me "In England you will be called colored". I replied "I am colored!", then added "I don't think you are white. I don't think anyone here is white". At this he replied "I'll be ill if I were white". Then he suggested I take a computer programming job with a temporary employment agency because some firms hire minorities under affirmative action programs and said "You have suffered because of race" and might now benefit because of race through affirmative action programs.

It all boils down to the conquest of territory. The British conquerors were patronising Indians and perhaps magnanimously allowing them a few upper level government jobs in India itself. India has to reverse this and conquer the territory of the United States and push the white population into Canada. I have shown how it can do this by means of a first strike with just two twenty kiloton warheads on Washington and New York, with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation.

ADDED ON MAY 11, 2009: Vajpayee was not the only C.I.A. agent in charge of India's national security (the same is the case with those in charge of India's national security now):-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2005/04/brijesh-mishra-cia-agent.html :-

Brijesh Mishra a CIA agent?

On September 27, 2001 Rahul Gandhi MP and his Columbian live in girlfriend of Kerala backwater tourist centre fame, Juanita alias Veronique,was arrested in United States of America's Logan airport in Boston, bythe FBI. Rahul was having an Italian passport and was carrying suitcasefull of dollars. Some say it was about $2 billion or was it $2 million.This huge dollar amount generated suspicion with the US authorities.Rahul and his girl friend was thus detained by FBI. FBI suspected thatRahul was carrying terrorist funds or drug money for laundering in US.Rahul called his mother Sonia Gandhi in India. In turn Sonia calledBrijesh Mishra, the former National Security Advisor and a key aide toformer prime minister Atal Behari Vajpayee at the Prime Ministers Office.Brijesh Mishra intervened on behalf of our PM Vajpayee with the USAdministration for the release Rahul from FBI custody. Rahul Gandhi wasreleased only when the Indian Ambassador intervened and gave assurances tothe State Department that Rahul Gandhi will be produced for any futureenquiry by FBI. Not only that as a patriot, it was the duty of BrijeshMishra to find out the reasons for the arrest and inform our CBI to takenecessary further steps. Brijesh Mishra did not do any such thing. Theincident clearly shows that Brajesh Mishra was working for Sonia, that hehad deep connections with US state department. In short Brijesh Mishra isa traitor.In Sep 2004 when Washington played host to Young political sons, SachinPilot, Milind Deora, Jitin Prasada (all Congress Party), and ManvendraSingh (a lone BJP fellow) followed by liquor baron who got himself electedto a the Rajya Sabha, Vijay Mallya (Janata Party) and ever smiling RajivShukla of the Congress. Yet one prominent face was missing which was thatof Rahul Gandhi. Rahul Gandhi didn't go to USA with the youngpoliticians. It was Shukla who conceived the idea of the Indo-USParliamentary Forum to create a counterpart to the India Caucus in the USHouse of Representatives. Rahul Gandhi had to avoid going to the U.S.forever, because of the pending police questions he could be arrestedagain by FBI if he ever steps in to US. What money Rahul Gandhi wascarrying? Was it another Bofors type pay off? Was it Columbian drugmoney on behalf of his Columbian girl friend? Or was it fund for Osama BinLaden group, as it is known that the Muslim terrorists are usingChristians as front men for laundering terrorist funds as the normalbanking channels are being monitored by FBI.Brijesh Mishra has strong connections with Sonia Gandhi's Italian familythrough his daughter Jyotsna. Jyotsna is married to an Italian and livesin Italy. So it is not surprising that there was no investigation whenSonia lied about her birth date, and birth place. Sonia Gandhi firstdeclared her birth date as 1944 and birth place as Luciana. This wasconfirmed by the Italian embassy which submitted her birth certificate toour Home ministry in 1983. Sonia Gandhi's name was Antonia Maino as perthis certificate. This true birth certificate was submitted by theItalian embassy to the Indian Home Ministry when Antonia Maino applied forIndian citizenship. When Rajiv Gandhi married Antonia Maino newspapershad written that both of them were of the same age. It also confirms thatSonia's birth year was 1944. . Antonia Maino's father, who was a masonand a fascist, Signor Stefano Maino, was a prisoner-of-war in Russia from1942 till Italy surrendered to the Allies in 1945. It is obvious thatMaino cannot be the father of Antonia Maino. So the date of birth andplace of birth of Antonia Maino alias Sonia Gandhi had to be changed tocover up this fact. Her new date of birth became December 9, 1946, andher place of birth became Orbassano. . Instead of investigating allthese fraud by Sonia Gandhi, Brijesh was working for Sonia Gandhi whileheading Prime Minister Vajpayee's Office. Even after the UPA governmentcame in to power Brijesh is holding a secret official position in thepresent UPA government that entitles him to a diplomatic passport. Thisshould be called the biggest treachery in modern India.Brajesh Mishra refused to authorize from February to May 2004 period thearrest of the CIA spy in RAW, .Rabinder Singh, despite repeated requestfor permission. This urgent request for arrest was asked by RAW officialMr.Amar Bhushan. It looks like Brijesh Mishra himself was working for CIAand thus by not permitting the arrest of a traitor enabled the CIA spy,Rabinder Singh to escape to USA in mid May 2004. From this one can guessthe capability of our Vajpayee who only dropped the corrupt N.K.Singh, butrefused to let go the traitor Brijesh Mishra in spite of warnings.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The elections in progress must be stopped until the national security issues have been addressed (see above and below).

There were millions of Indians who served in the British Indian army under a few thousand British officers. Those Indians served the imperialist purposes of the British against India and were traitors serving India's enemies. Complaining about Indians not being given employment opportunities by restrictions on the U.S. H1-B visa program is like complaining about Indians not being given employment opportunities to serve in the British Indian army to serve the purposes of India's enemies. To say that India will not implement the nuclear deal if the U.S. imposes restrictions on such employment opportunities for Indians shows utter imbecility and ignorance of the basics of human relations and power or of economics and statecraft; it makes this BJP politician unfit for any thing other than to be a shoe-polisher of the White Master which is what all Indian politicians are; there are infinitely better reasons not to implement the nuclear deal (see below) as there are infinitely better ways of providing employment opportunities to Indians (see below). There is only one Indian who can save Indians from themselves. First these elections have to be stopped on the grounds of national security. As for the foreign exchange such employment brings, I have said, in a column which appeared in Indian Express, Delhi, over 15 years ago that if such economists were made into canned dog food and exported to earn foreign exchange, that is about all the foreign exchange India really needs; the rest is a creation of people of this type. The same is true of politicians and many others. See what I have said below about the foreign exchange that SEZs and various kinds of outsourced work -- software, BPOs, etc. -- bring. As for an international 'free market' in labor that imbeciles such as Subramanian Swamy advocate, the less said the better. As for the "Harvard-educated" people Indian newspapers, etc., extol, well, any bullock-cart driver has better sense than these people.

When African slaves were bought and sold in America's free markets, the role they played in America's economy had nothing in common with the role a white field hand doing similar-looking work played. Technically and in very simplified terms, this is the formalistic fallacy, looking at the form of behavior without looking at the controlling variables. The role that Indian 'techies' working for Americans play has nothing in common with the role American 'techies' play. This applies just as much to entrepreneurs and billionaires. The difference is in power and dominance just as it was with the few British officers and their far more numerous Indian sepoys or the lone Englishman and the fifty black sowars. It explains why the fifty black sowars, any one of whom could have brought him down with a single shot, did not do so. It was because of this when an American motor-cycle rider with an American chess player were talking near me about the American space shuttle in a Harvard Square cafe -- this was just before the shuttle Challenger disaster occurred whose significance I will not go into -- the former joked about the possibility of the Israelis 'hijacking' the shuttle -- an Israeli was going to be in the crew -- but added at least they will do a "professional job". When they were talking about its not being a "true shuttle", I commented "They discard the boosters". The chess player then simply nodded saying "What goes up must come down" but the motor-cyclist, curling his lips with contempt at the temerity of an Indian in commenting about the shuttle, referred to all the "janitors and engineers" (meaning janitors from Mexico, etc. and engineers from India, etc.) "who keep things going". After the Challenger disaster I reminded the chess player of his companion's comment about "janitors and engineers" but he did not take the point.

I have referred above (addendum dated March 18, 2009) to a New York Times columnist writing about "external cognitive servants" -- such as Indians in Bangalore -- doing Americans' work and later, when I said, in an E-Mail to an American 'People are careless about grammar and spelling in E-Mail and I don't like that ... but your E-Mails are perfect', a female columnist in the same newspaper wrote a column headed "A penny for my thoughts" about paying slave wages to someone in Bangalore to write her columns. It is for such slave work that these imbecile Indians are fighting in exchange for entering the even deeper slavery of the nuclear deal. Even Indian billionaires such as the Ambanis fronting for American exploitation of Indians -- as in their refineries SEZ project I have referred to below -- are such slaves. As I have shown below, even for material prosperity, leaving aside psychological prosperity, such work is disastrous. See, for example, what I have said below:-

"Slavery in nuclear matters also makes possible slavery in economic matters. In Special Economic Zones (SEZs), American companies use Indians as slave laborers-- paying them a fraction of what even the lowest paid American workers are paid-- to produce goods and services for the American consumer. In no way can the output of Special Economic Zones be considered a part of India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP), nor should the output of software export and call center, etc. (B.P.O.) operations--which meet the needs of American companies and American consumers-- be considered a part of India's GDP and most of the rise in GDP growth rate, being trumpeted by traitors, is from the SEZs and IT and B.P.O. operations. If a foreign enemy comes and commandeers millions of Indians to work as slave labor to meet the needs of its own people-- having them work within India rather than shipping them to America as slaves used to be shipped through native middlemen to pick cotton-- it is still slavery. I have written about the fallacy because of which exports and earning a lot of foreign exchange are considered a good thing and said 'A crore of goods and services sold domestically is worth several crores of goods and services sold abroad so far as the effect on India's prosperity is concerned'. The foreign exchange (such as dollars) you get by selling goods and services abroad can only ultimately be used to buy goods and services abroad which starts chains of economic activity in the foreign country (the United States) rather than in your own country and, through the 'multiplier effect' I have described, increases the GDP of the foreign country by several times the amount of the foreign exchange you obtained, not your own country's. A report on a mega refinery complex being set up in an SEZ on India's west coast by Reliance refers to the several thousand luxurious villas that will be built for foreign workers while Indian slave laborers will live in slave housing; the output of the refinery --gasoline-- will be used almost exclusively by American consumers but the environmental harm caused by the refinery will occur in India; by using Indian companies as a front-- in this case Reliance into which Americans will be putting their money-- American capital will be producing gasoline for American consumers using Indians as slave labor and transferring the pollution caused by the refineries to India. In no way can this SEZ be called a part of India's economy. Even in the IT sector, the largest Indian company-- Infosys-- is more than half owned by foreigners; hundreds of thousands of engineering graduates per year are being produced by Indian engineering colleges -- RAW, which runs the Indian government, acts as a branch of the C.I.A. against India and has engineered this use of Indian engineering graduates-- to work as software coolies for American companies (you do not need engineering graduates to provide payroll processing which is what Indian software coolies have mostly been doing) while many others work night shifts in the B.P.O. industry, in call centers, doing what does not require even a high school education to do in the United States. SEZs were set up in China by bribing people in the Chinese government to let American companies use Chinese people as slave labor for American consumers and all the Chinese in government now wear Western suits and send as many Chinese for higher studies and to settle in the U.S. as do Indians. To camouflage the true nature of this arrangement, the United States government regularly 'complains' to the Chinese government about the U.S. "trade deficit" with China, but in no way can American companies producing in China, using Chinese as slave laborers, for the American consumer and then shipping the products to the United States be considered 'trade'; it is slave trade but instead of the slaves' bodies, their products are being shipped to the United States. Because of Indians knowing English, Americans first used Indians for IT and B.P.O. but are now switching to manufacture as well, the basic paradigm being the use of the populations of China and India as slave labor for the American consumer by bribing people in the governments of these countries. In the case of Russia, the paradigm is to loot Russia's natural resources for the American consumer by bribing people in the Russian government. Because of the exchange rate, the slave laborers in the B.P.O., doing health-destroying work at night at a fraction of the wage rates of the lowest paid American workers, are paid large amounts in rupees (the foreign exchange goes to the government and can only be used ultimately to buy foreign goods and services and increase the foreign country's GDP, not India's, as I have said) which enables them to buy the output of ten times as many Indians while producing nothing for the Indian economy-- the goods and services they produce meet the needs of American consumers and companies, not Indian consumers and companies. One million B.P.O. workers suck up the output of, say, ten million Indians; ten million B.P.O. workers will suck up the output of a hundred million Indians, while producing nothing for the Indian economy. Thus, American companies, while using ten million Indians as direct slave laborers, will be using a hundred million Indians as indirect slave laborers because a hundred million Indians will be supporting the ten million Indians working for American companies as slave laborers. And, since these ten million Indians will be producing nothing for the Indian economy (no goods or services for the Indian consumer) and will be sucking up the output of another one hundred million Indians-- thus, they will be greatly REDUCING India's GDP available to the rest of the population, not adding to it-- the rupee salaries paid to these ten million Indians will be highly inflationary as well, further damaging the Indian economy. This applies to operations such as call centers (B.P.O.), software export and SEZs for export.

Haryana's chief minister asked how else to provide employment to the state's population. By implementing my proposal about money [see below], India can have true and extremely rapid prosperity and full employment."

To quote Milton again, it is better to rule in hell than to serve in heaven. But the demons wouldn't let you alone in your poverty and come and invade you. That is why they have to be destroyed first. To put it as simply as possible, the white man is the demon that has to be destroyed (see press release dated November 8, 2008 below).

Psychologist Carl Jung often referred to the aggressive, domineering blue-eyed blonde white as the affliction of mankind and castigated the British for their arrogant attitude toward Indians. Destroying the whites equals rescuing the gentle dark-skinned people from the aggression of the white man. It was the dark-skinned Krishna who said:

"Paritranaya Sadhunam
Vinashayacha Dushkritam
Dharma Samsthapanarthaya
Sambhavami Yuge Yuge".

If my guidance was good enough for Indira Gandhi as Prime Minister 34 years ago, it should be good enough for Indians now. The guidance I am providing now is "Nuclear Supremacy, Not Nuclear Deal" (see below).

ADDED ON MAY 13, 2009: The following E-Mail has been sent to the Election Commission of India, New Delhi, today:-

Date: May 13, 2009
From: Satish Chandra
Telephone: 01-617-282-4996
FAX: 01-617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra24@hotmail.com
To: Members of the Election Commission, New Delhi
C/O feedback@eci.gov.in, ashishs@eci.gov.in, kakumar@eci.gov.in, rksrivastava@eci.gov.in, kfwilfred@eci.gov.in, ystandhope@eci.gov.in, skrudola@eci.gov.in, jaipriye@eci.gov.in, balakrish@eci.gov.in, dralokshukla@eci.gov.in

Dear Sirs:
With reference to the last paragraph of the addendum dated May 11, 2009 below and the rest of the Press Release dated November 14, 2008-May 11, 2009 below, this is to request that the counting of the votes in the just concluded elections be withheld or halted, on the grounds of national security, till the national security issues have been addressed.
Sincerely,
Satish Chandra

CC: Major Indian media organs

Date: May 13, 2009 (Second letter of this date)
From: Satish Chandra
Telephone: 01-617-282-4996
FAX: 01-617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra24@hotmail.com
To: Members of the Election Commission, New Delhi
C/O feedback@eci.gov.in, ashishs@eci.gov.in, kakumar@eci.gov.in, rksrivastava@eci.gov.in, kfwilfred@eci.gov.in, ystandhope@eci.gov.in, skrudola@eci.gov.in, jaipriye@eci.gov.in, balakrish@eci.gov.in, dralokshukla@eci.gov.in

Dear Sirs:
With reference to my earlier letter of today's date to you (included below), the national security issues I referred to in it include the following: in my addendum dated February 26, 2006 (below), titled "National security crisis due to microwaves from satellites", I say "This shows that the C.I.A. can control any digital equipment, not just computers, by microwaves from satellites. This applies to all digital equipment, such as that used in a multitude of defence applications, electric power grids, nuclear power plants, etc., even if the equipment is not connected to the outside world by telephone lines." This includes electronic voting machines; the United States has the ability to manipulate vote counts in electronic voting machines by microwaves from satellites. I repeat my request that the counting of votes in the just concluded elections be withheld or halted, on the grounds of national security, till the national security issues have been addressed.
Sincerely,
Satish Chandra

CC: Major Indian media organs

ADDED ON MAY 14, 2009: Since I refer to my addendum dated February 26 '09 in my second letter dated May 13 '09, above, to the Election Commission (I have received no response so far) about national security issues: an Indian missile man on the Bharat-Rakshak forum once referred to Indians' concerns being to "get paid, make babies, chase girls". Although DRDO has been far more concerned about national security than the armed forces, politicians, civil servants, the media, etc. -- which actively undermine it -- or the general public, even DRDO has been rather indifferent to national security, such as by submitting to 'collaborations' with India's enemies such as Israel, failing to destroy India's enemies in New Delhi by obeying India's sovereign, etc.; such collaborations amount to engaging in activities that constitute a faux defence of India and, therefore, by providing a false sense of security, when genuine security is possible, undermine India's national security which undermines everything else, including India's economy.

I have referred below to bought -up nuclear scientists sabotaging India's indigenous program in various ways. DRDO officials -- bought up or not -- are now sabotaging India's indigenous programs by saying they cannot provide an anti-ballistic missile defence system before 2020 and that, too, with Israeli help -- whereas a year or so ago they were saying India's indigenous ABM system will be operational in three years (see below) -- and supporting spending billions upon billions of dollars for Israeli missiles (for which C.I.A.-RAW-controlled Army officers provided a false excuse by citing an imminent Chinese threat, never mind the continuing enemy action by the United States and Israel), technology and help instead of putting the money in indigenous efforts.

I have said DRDO are India's real warriors, not the armed forces. India's warriors have to obey India's sovereign.

ADDED ON MAY 16, 2009: It is no use developing bigger and better missiles if you don't use what you have to destroy India's enemies IN A TIMELY FASHION, now that the elections -- decided by the C.I.A. by microwaves from satellites -- are over. India is being hijacked by India's enemies; are India's missile men going to continue to "get paid, make babies, chase girls" or are they going to obey India's sovereign and destroy India's enemies with the weapons they already have? I am looking for some trace, some spark of life in India's missile men that will allow India to survive.

The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A headline says: "Pak will retain nukes at any cost: PM".

What is the use of retaining nukes if you don't use them against the aggressor who is carrying out missile attacks from drones on your territory several times a month?

To see how to use your nukes against the United States, see my blog.

Do you have any idea what the United States will do if you carried out even one drone attack on its territory?

Similarly, I have said to India's missile men (see my blog below): "It is no use developing bigger and better missiles if you don't use what you have to destroy India's enemies IN A TIMELY FASHION, now that the elections -- decided by the C.I.A. by microwaves from satellites -- are over. India is being hijacked by India's enemies; are India's missile men going to continue to "get paid, make babies, chase girls" or are they going to obey India's sovereign and destroy India's enemies with the weapons they already have? I am looking for some trace, some spark of life in India's missile men that will allow India to survive."

What do I mean by 'a trace, a spark of life'? This is what I wrote about that: "The population of Delhi/New Delhi which, by the hundreds of thousands, stood and watched silently India’s emperor, after surrendering his sword, arrested and led away by a lone Englishman with “fifty black sowars” -- the Englishman sent the Indian emperor’s jewel-encrusted sword to the British monarch -- though, as the Englishman wrote home to England, anyone of them -- his fifty black sowars -- could have brought him down with a single shot." Neither the population of Delhi in 1858 nor those fifty black sowars had a trace, a spark of life.

In a letter dated June 27, 2004 to the press, I wrote “Technology, however, is necessary but not sufficient for independence; if the perceived willingness -- perceived by yourself and others -- to use your arms is zero, their value -- deterrent and other -- is zero. The United States has a decisive advantage -- ideological, economic and military -- over the rest of the world because of its demonstrated willingness to use its nuclear arms.” This applies as much to the use of nuclear arms within the country against agents of a foreign power -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will be the first such use of nuclear arms -- as outside the country. Also, as I have repeatedly emphasised, nuclear arms against the United States are needed not to “deter” it but to actually destroy it because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy, that is, to overcome deterrence. In other words, the United States cannot be deterred, only destroyed. For this India needs nuclear supremacy over the United States and a minimum of ten thousand nuclear warheads -- an objective that is well within India’s reach; attaining this objective requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi first."

See also: Actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDED ON MAY 18, 2009: A U.S. intelligence operative I referred to in the addendum dated April 24, 2009 above who "lives in the U.S. making missiles for the U.S. government and, among other things, collects intelligence on Indian missiles and other subjects for U.S. intelligence agencies", threatened to ban anyone on the Bharat-Rakshak forum who mentions any rigging in the just concluded elections. Anyone who refers to what I say is banned. After I started posting on the blog of a former head of RAW, Vikram Sood, K. Subrahmanyam pleaded with him to delete all my posts and he deleted them. An example of any mention of vote count manipulation being squelched by threat of a ban from Bharat Rakshak:-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Raju) Quote:
"I wonder how i got only 5 votes from an area that is a Shiv Sena stronghold," the defeated candidate said"

reports like this are coming from many places. this election year saw maximum number of malfunctioning EVM's. Isnt' that curious ?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Raju) Quote:

"It should be mention that in this election, for the first time, the EC is using a new "totaliser" technology for mixing results from all booths."

Have they tied up with Diebold who created new software in which if one pressed on John Kerry's name, he got a slip with George Bush pic thanking him for voting Bush.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Sanjay M) I think that we need to get away from Electronic Voting Machines, and towards a voting system with an audit trail. Convenience must not take precedence over accuracy and robustness, otherwise democracy will inevitably be jeopardized.When you see how vigorously power is contested in India, all the more reason to fear that shortcuts will be taken. And an electronic system offers the most opportunity for shortcuts, without immediately revealing it.

I can't help but notice that the biggest winner in the entire election was the United States. All parties that have toed America's line have done well, and all parties that are seen as thorns in the side of US interests have done poorly. An odd coincidence.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By sanjaychoudhry) Quote:

"I can't help but notice that the biggest winner in the entire election was the United States. All parties that have toed America's line have done well, and all parties that are seen as thorns in the side of US interests have done poorly. An odd coincidence."

This is what has been troubling me since yesterday. Something stinks. The results are bizzare. Tony Blair and other Goras have been praising Rahul Gandhi publicly at every opportunity and calling him prime minister material for India. And lo and behold, the results that have come up have trounced everyone -- whether right or left -- except the Congress. Rahul Gandhi has in one shot emerged as a legitimate prime ministerial candidate much praised for his "organisational" skills when we all know he cannot speak a single sentence coherently.

I am not convinced that there has been no manipulation. Notice the way Congress has gone out of its way to plant Navin Chawla in EC. The truth may come out in some years as some people involved in the fraud begin to leak information. I think the Congress has been ably assisted by the "international community" in this game. The fraud may have not been everywhere, but restricted to some make-or-break states to avoid creating a pattern. I think the BJP ruled states have largely been left alone, but states where its allies were contesting were targetted, along with smaller states such as Uttarkhand which can have a "Congress landslide" without arousing too much attention.

The two make or break states were AP and TN, both contested by potential BJP allies. Is it a coincidence that 80 percent of the 2.5 billion dollars "charity money" flowing from the Goras into India every year is headed straight to these two states only? This is according to the figures released by the home ministry.

If the BJP is smart and the "international community" is to be thwarted, it will campaign for going back to the paper based ballotting which can be audited. Many countries have discontinued EVMs and gone back to paper ballot due to the unreliability of EVMs and their fraud potential. Even the US agencies evaluated EVMs and rejected them and decided to continue with paper ballots.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Raju) Quote:

"A muslim friend of mine told me that while pressing their party symbol DMK’s symbol flashed. .

I can’t say whether the election was free and fair in other parts of India but it certainly wasn’t in Chennai."

holy moly. Diebold marks its arrival in India.

Quote:

"Many voters couldn’t vote because their names were removed from the lists at the last minute. Caste and Religious profiling was done to lessen the damage to DMK. I am a witness to this. In my family 5 were registered voters only one was able to vote on the election day."

so there has been a combination of tools used, not just reliance of one single tool. this is what is confusing and despiriting the opposition ranks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Raju) EVM can be rigged at chip level or bypass introduced such as which indicates DMK light even when some other party has been selected, atleast a few rigged ones can be incorporated into the chain at last moment without attracting attention. those who are responsible for sending particular EVMs to particular booths can be planted by sarkari planted IB-types. This can be done in a way without raising much suspiscion. Party representatives always make noise if they feel the machines are rigged, but when a loser makes a noise the world automatically believes it is sour grapes because he lost rather than anything else. this is where media comes into picture, they need to take up such cases pro-actively. If they sit silent, then whole issue can be swept under carpet. Secondly in other places like states ruled by UPA allies, the voting lists can be tampered with at last moment to neutralize potential anti-incumbant voters. Thirdly, fringe parties like MNS, LS, PRP can also be cultivated, but there is nothing illegal in this. A combination of all three factors have been used in this election.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Raju) today someone from my constituency was telling me of this problem in one polling booth where the person pressed CPI(M) candidates button and the light for UPA candidate came on. again this happened to happen in a constituency where competition was neck-to-neck and margins very tight.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Pranav) very credible sources Re Sonia's history of being on foreign intelligence payroll, billions kept by Gandhi family in Swiss bank accounts as per credible sources, deliberate release of Naxal terrorists, condoning of illegal Bangladeshi infiltration, massive corruption (supposedly 1,00,000 crores in spectrum allocation alone). But people need to be convinced that their quality of life depends on these issues (which it in fact does). People need to be able to connect the Swiss banks with the fact that their child does not have access to a decent education in a government school.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Pranav) People have been critical of vote fraud issues being raised here. My approach is summarized as follows:

1. Are there the means for vote fraud - yes, via the EVMs and the totaliser software. There have been long technical discussions Re EVMs in other threads.

2. Is there the motive? yes, obviously

3. Are the powers that be sufficiently amoral? Yes, CEC is known Gandhi clan thug.

As I see it, it is the responsibility of the authorities to conduct an election that is fair and seen to be fair. It is not the responsibility of citizens to prove vote fraud - in fact, the citizens should take the healthy, skeptical attitude that where there is scope for abuse, there will be abuse. One has no great faith in the honesty of our ruling dispensation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Arjun) Pranav wrote:

"People have been critical of vote fraud issues being raised here. My approach is summarized as follows:

1. Are there the means for vote fraud - yes, via the EVMs and the totaliser software. There have been long technical discussions Re EVMs in other threads.

2. Is there the motive? yes, obviously

3. Are the powers that be sufficiently amoral? Yes, CEC is known Gandhi clan thug.

As I see it, it is the responsibility of the authorities to conduct an election that is fair and seen to be fair. It is not the responsibility of citizens to prove vote fraud - in fact, the citizens should take the healthy, skeptical attitude that where there is scope for abuse, there will be abuse. One has no great faith in the honesty of our ruling dispensation."

If you really believe in this, why don't you publish the details of exactly how the EVMs can be tampered with (step 1, step 2...) and demo it out publicly? That will certainly get people to take notice.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Pranav) The technicalities are not that hard to understand. An EVM can be rigged by inserting a trojan in the assembly code which will be activated in favour of a paritcular candidate by a sequence of key-presses. The trojan, once activated, can erase evidence of those key-presses. This has been discussed on other threads a while back.

Also, the totaliser software could easily change votes while mixing votes from all the booths.

Unfortunately I don't personally have the time and resources to stage a demo, but I am propagating the message in the hope that people in parties like TDP, Left, BJP, AIADMK will take it up. A PIL also needs to be launched to make a paper trail mandatory for all future elections.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Sanjay M) Of course, as you've pointed out, EVMs can permit a whole new sophisticated level of fraud for more sophisticated perpetrators (eg. a large foreign power, or a ruling party in control of state machinery)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(By Pranav) ramana wrote:

"Pranav, I dont think the EVM rigging issue is correct. Until you can come up with alternate info I suggest you give it a rest. Pleased dont bring it up again. If you want you can consider this a one and final warning.ramana"

Fine, in any case I am done with making the point.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Note that he is standing by his point but he has had to stop talking about it to avoid being banned. The person who said to him "why don't you publish the details of exactly how the EVMs can be tampered with (step 1, step 2...) and demo it out publicly? That will certainly get people to take notice" has also been threatened with a ban. Earlier, people who made any reference to what I said were banned.

As I have said, the vote count manipulation in this election was done by microwaves from satellites.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
After I posted the above on Pakistan Defence Forum, the RAW operatives there, as usual, posted a torrent of abuse an example of which is the following:-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
.
.
.
There is a mental asylum just 5km from my place. Want me to make advance reservations? Dont worry they dont ask for money, but a proof of insanity. They would be pleased to accept you if you come with a compilation of all your articles...Thanks
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My post:-
---------------------------------------------------------------------
As I say below every post of mine:

"Don't be distracted by abuse, ridicule, etc. C.I.A.-RAW operatives post here. It is meant to prevent Indians & Pakistanis from thinking about defending against the U.S.To educate yourself, see Nuclear Supremacy for India over U.S. "

People such as K. Subrahmanyam, who has been the kingpin of C.I.A. operations in India for decades, may be able to flee to the United States, where he will be eaten by the Americans who will be eating each other after India's nuclear first strike on the United States. But most of these garden variety RAW operatives such as the ones posting above will not be able to flee and will be dealt with in other ways.

Of course, it is not easy to save Indians from themselves. As I say elsewhere "No more than about 80,000 British, women and children included, ruled India for centuries. Nothing that can be said about the stupidity and slavishness of Indians will be an exaggeration.... That is why in his only reference to India in his 'Mein Kampf', Adolf Hitler said "As for India, I would rather see India under the British than under any one else". It is not just that a handful of the British from half way around the world ruled India for centuries; a lot of other people did that from various countries for a thousand years.

A modern day Babar will start each day by killing a million Indians before breakfast every morning, though some think three million will be better (this number can be herded into fairly small extermination circles and then a neutron bomb exploded over them).

I am an Indian, but as far above the other Indians as they may be above cockroaches."

To get a perspective on the state of affairs in India, see post # 1 of the following thread : RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency ):-
.
.
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
A Pakistani then asked:-
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha lol kaal2009 is one funny man! i wonder why your fellow country man dislike you so much here?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
My response:-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The American journalist Seymour Hersh, famous for exposing the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War, who was later sued for saying in his book on Kissinger that Indian prime minister Morarji Desai had been a long time C.I.A. agent who was paid $20,000 per year (the reaction of Indians was not outrage that he was a C.I.A. agent but surprise that he was paid so little and did not demand more money), said to me the first time I talked to him on the telephone "You don't sound like an Indian!"

Like I said above, I am an Indian but very very different from other Indians.

As I have said in the article on RAW reproduced in the previous post of mine, India's first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, had been a life-long British agent, as he admitted to U.S. ambassador J. K. Galbraith. Vajpayee, a prime minister from the BJP party, has been a life long agent of first the British (he was a paid "informer" for the British and gave the testimony based on which the British jailed some participants in the 'Quit India' movement before Independence) and later of the C.I.A. and he is still worshipped as their guide and father-figure by the supposedly 'nationalist' BJP party. About Indira and Rajiv Gandhi, the less said the better (see my blog about them and about the current prime minister, Manmohan Singh, etc.). And these people fully reflect the character of Indians as a whole, the character that the pacifist propaganda has imparted to them.

And, oh boy, if you want to know about The Mahatma -- M. K. Gandhi, who was no relative of Indira and Rajiv -- see my blog.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDED ON MAY 19, 2009: I have said above India is being hijacked by India's enemies. Since it is the C.I.A. which decided the election by microwaves from satellites, the United States can now have Manmohan Singh do whatever it wants. A New York Times editorial outlines the agenda -- strip India of its nuclear weapons, "open its markets" and do whatever else the United States wants in everything else. Parties such as the SP, RJD and BSP, which the microwaves from satellites robbed of many seats, are rushing to declare "unconditional support" for Manmohan Singh so the C.I.A. will consider them as much its puppets as is Manmohan Singh. And this is just the beginning.

It is not too late for India's missile men to do their job.

The following article was referred to in a post on Bharat-Rakshak; it should be quite educational for Indians (this article refers to vote counts being manipulated "wirelessly" but, note, manipulation of vote counts by microwaves from satellites, done by the C.I.A. in this election in India, does NOT require wireless cards referred to in this article); at the very least, the elections just held should be nullified and voting repeated with paper ballots; much more preferably, a dictator should be appointed (see above) which is what the situation in India demands:-

Most electronic voting isn't secure, CIA expert says
Greg Gordon McClatchy Newspapers
last updated: March 24, 2009 04:27:14 PM
WASHINGTON — The CIA, which has been monitoring foreign countries' use of electronic voting systems, has reported apparent vote-rigging schemes in Venezuela, Macedonia and Ukraine and a raft of concerns about the machines' vulnerability to tampering.
Appearing last month before a U.S. Election Assistance Commission field hearing in Orlando, Fla., a CIA cybersecurity expert suggested that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and his allies fixed a 2004 election recount, an assertion that could further roil U.S. relations with the Latin leader.
In a presentation that could provide disturbing lessons for the United States, where electronic voting is becoming universal, Steve Stigall summarized what he described as attempts to use computers to undermine democratic elections in developing nations. His remarks have received no news media attention until now.
Stigall told the Election Assistance Commission, a tiny agency that Congress created in 2002 to modernize U.S. voting, that computerized electoral systems can be manipulated at five stages, from altering voter registration lists to posting results.
"You heard the old adage 'follow the money,' " Stigall said, according to a transcript of his hour-long presentation that McClatchy obtained. "I follow the vote. And wherever the vote becomes an electron and touches a computer, that's an opportunity for a malicious actor potentially to . . . make bad things happen."
Stigall said that voting equipment connected to the Internet could be hacked, and machines that weren't connected could be compromised wirelessly. Eleven U.S. states have banned or limited wireless capability in voting equipment, but Stigall said that election officials didn't always know it when wireless cards were embedded in their machines.
While Stigall said that he wasn't speaking for the CIA and wouldn't address U.S. voting systems, his presentation appeared to undercut calls by some U.S. politicians to shift to Internet balloting, at least for military personnel and other American citizens living overseas. Stigall said that most Web-based ballot systems had proved to be insecure.
The commission has been criticized for giving states more than $1 billion to buy electronic equipment without first setting performance standards. Numerous computer-security experts have concluded that U.S. systems can be hacked, and allegations of tampering in Ohio, Florida and other swing states have triggered a campaign to require all voting machines to produce paper audit trails.
The CIA got interested in electronic systems a few years ago, Stigall said, after concluding that foreigners might try to hack U.S. election systems. He said he couldn't elaborate "in an open, unclassified forum," but that any concerns would be relayed to U.S. election officials.
Stigall, who's studied electronic systems in about three dozen countries, said that most countries' machines produced paper receipts that voters then dropped into boxes. However, even that doesn't prevent corruption, he said.
Turning to Venezuela, he said that Chavez controlled all of the country's voting equipment before he won a 2004 nationwide recall vote that had threatened to end his rule.
When Chavez won, Venezuelan mathematicians challenged results that showed him to be consistently strong in parts of the country where he had weak support. The mathematicians found "a very subtle algorithm" that appeared to adjust the vote in Chavez's favor, Stigall said.
Calls for a recount left Chavez facing a dilemma, because the voting machines produced paper ballots, Stigall said.
"How do you defeat the paper ballots the machines spit out?" Stigall asked. "Those numbers must agree, must they not, with the electronic voting-machine count? . . . In this case, he simply took a gamble."
Stigall said that Chavez agreed to allow 100 of 19,000 voting machines to be audited.
"It is my understanding that the computer software program that generated the random number list of voting machines that were being randomly audited, that program was provided by Chavez," Stigall said. "That's my understanding. It generated a list of computers that could be audited, and they audited those computers.
"You know. No pattern of fraud there."
A Venezuelan Embassy representative in Washington declined immediate comment.
The disclosure of Stigall's remarks comes amid recent hostile rhetoric between President Barack Obama and Chavez. On Sunday, Chavez was quoted as reacting hotly to Obama's assertion that he's been "exporting terrorism," referring to the new U.S. president as a "poor ignorant person."
Questions about Venezuela's voting equipment caused a stir in the United States long before Obama became president, because Smartmatic, a voting machine company that partnered with a firm hired by Chavez's government, owned U.S.-based Sequoia Voting Systems until 2007. Sequoia machines were in use in 16 states and the District of Columbia at the time.
Reacting to complaints that the arrangement was a national security concern, the Treasury Department's Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States launched an investigation. Smartmatic then announced in November 2007 that it had sold Sequoia to a group of investors led by Sequoia's U.S.-based management team, thus ending the inquiry.
In the former Soviet republic of Georgia, Stigall said, hackers took resurrecting the dead to "a new art form" by adding the names of people who'd died in the 18th century to computerized voter-registration lists. Macedonia was accused of "voter genocide" because the names of so many Albanians living in the country were eradicated from the computerized lists, Stigall said.
He said that elections also could be manipulated when votes were cast, when ballots were moved or transmitted to central collection points, when official results were tabulated and when the totals were posted on the Internet.
In Ukraine, Stigall said, opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko lost a 2004 presidential election runoff because supporters of Russian-backed Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych "introduced an unauthorized computer into the Ukraine election committee national headquarters. They snuck it in.
"The implication is that these people were . . . making subtle adjustments to the vote. In other words, intercepting the votes before it goes to the official computer for tabulation."
Taped cell-phone calls of the ensuing cover-up led to nationwide protests and a second runoff, which Yushchenko won.
Election Assistance Commission officials didn't trumpet Stigall's appearance Feb. 27, and he began by saying that he didn't wish to be identified. However, the election agency had posted his name and biography on its Web site before his appearance.
Electronic voting systems have been controversial in advanced countries, too. Germany's constitutional court banned computerized machines this month on the grounds that they don't allow voters to check their choices.
Stigall said that some countries had taken novel steps that improved security.
For example, he said, Internet systems that encrypt vote results so they're unrecognizable during transmission "greatly complicates malicious corruption." Switzerland, he noted, has had success in securing Internet voting by mailing every registered citizen scratch cards that contain unique identification numbers for signing on to the Internet. Then the voters must answer personal security questions, such as naming their mothers' birthplaces.
Stigall commended Russia for transmitting vote totals over classified communication lines and inviting hackers to test its electronic voting system for vulnerabilities. He said that Russia now hoped to enable its citizens to vote via cell phones by next year.
"As Russia moves to a one-party state," he said, "they're trying to make their elections available . . . so everyone can vote for the one party. That's the irony."
After reviewing Stigall's remarks, Susannah Goodman, the director of election reform for the citizens' lobby Common Cause, said they showed that "we can no longer ignore the fact that all of these risks are present right here at home . . . and must secure our election system by requiring every voter to have his or her vote recorded on a paper ballot."

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY
Glitches, machine breakdowns hamper voting in five states
Computer expert denies knowledge of '04 vote rigging in Ohio
Warning on voting machines reveals oversight failure
Did Washington waste millions on faulty voting machines?
McClatchy Newspapers 2009

From actually sabotaging India's missile tests, C.I.A.-RAW has gone to putting out a report of an Agni-II test failure and telling Indian missile scientists to say that the information about Indian missiles they put on Bharat-Rakshak is deliberately obfuscated, so India's sovereign would not think he can destroy India's enemies in New Delhi, New York and Washington. The numerous posts on Bharat-Rakshak about how vote counts in electronic voting machines can and were manipulated have been covered up by a retired brigadier of the Indian army -- a C.I.A.-RAW operative like other moderators there -- while others continue doing what they have been doing -- collecting intelligence on Indian missiles, etc., for foreign intelligence agencies and keeping Indians from any thought of defending against the United State.

Here is another post, dated May 20, 2009, from Bharat-Rakshak, regarding a team of foreign intelligence agencies whose members were "often seen-by SPG at the residence of Ms.Sonia Gandhi reading secret files being made available to her by some Ministers and bureaucrats. Indian intelligence is being blocked by the Home Minister P.Chidambaram from investigating whether ... Green is an operative for British Intelligence, the MI-6 ...One of the tasks assigned to this nefarious team is how to doctor the electronic voting machines in about 50 constituencies by using dual passwords technique and by hacking via wireless cyber techniques":-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(By aryank) Subramaniam Swamy's press release for 4/4/2009

Quote:

04.04.2009

PRESS RELEASE

The Congress Party President Ms.Sonia Gandhi seeing the imminent collapse of the UPA has set-up a seven member ‘crisis management’ team of foreigners based in a five star hotel in Delhi. This is a serious threat India’s national security.

While the names of all seven members are available with me, I am gathering the detailed antecedents of these dirty seven. The first member identified for me is an obscure UK-based journalist called Mr.David Green who has written for London tabloids on “snack foods”. He was easy to identify because he is often seen-by SPG at the residence of Ms.Sonia Gandhi reading secret files being made available to her by some Ministers and bureaucrats. Indian intelligence is being blocked by the Home Minister P.Chidambaram from investigating whether Ms.Green is an operative for British Intelligence, the MI-6.

One of the tasks assigned to this nefarious team is how to doctor the electronic voting machines in about 50 constituencies by using dual passwords technique and by hacking via wireless cyber techniques.

(SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY)

http://janataparty.org/pressdetail.asp?rowid=58

Is this EVM hacking news true? This has come from Swamy on 4/4/2009.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
In the buying of MPs' votes in the no-confidence motion against Manmohan Singh's government, the final approval of the payment to each of the MPs being bribed was by the Italian woman's political secretary, Ahmed Patel, separately for each individual MP being bribed, as the blow-by-blow accounts of the bribery described. The Italian woman was the source of the money, who has billions of dollars in her foreign bank accounts. But the BJP was insistent that no accusation will be made against the Italian woman in that bribery scandal and the accusations will stop at Amar Singh. During the debate on the no-confidence motion, Advani said 'We don't want to "destabilise" this government, we want to "defeat" it [in elections later]'; in other words, he did not want the no-confidence motion to succeed [or the confidence motion to fail] or the nuclear deal to be stopped. The BJP plays on the same team as the Congress party -- the C.I.A.'s team -- as do the Left politicians. They make faux attacks on each other to fool their supporters and the public but they are all working for the C.I.A.; as I said in the addendum of December 12 '06 to January 9 '07 below "Mukherjee's confidence that despite some "political flak" the deal will get through was based on knowing that the BJP and Left leaders also will obey their American bribe-givers (and not just the bribery of contact)". After I sent the above article about the C.I.A. expert's testimony regarding the manipulation of vote counts in electronic voting machines, there is a report of some BJP politicians in Orissa demanding a return to paper ballots but no such demand, or for nullifying the just concluded election results and repeating the voting with paper ballots, from the BJP at the national level.

It might be said that I am saying the above because I would like to be the dictator of India. But let the people elect a dictator; all that I ask is that the suppression of me by C.I.A.-RAW -- the media black out, among other things -- be lifted. Let the people decide who will be the best dictator. Let a dictator be elected for five years at a time.

But doesn't the C.I.A. control many dictators around the world? Yes, that is why it is important that the people know what C.I.A.-RAW has been doing to me -- and to India -- for the past 32 years. Once this is publicly known, you could even keep the present system and the people will still choose me.

The above is a reasonable request. You all know the alternatives.

In my letter to Indira Gandhi just before the elections in 1977 she lost so badly -- it was crystal clear, to her and to everyone else, that she will lose disastrously and news photographs showed her literally running from her plane to election meetings -- I wrote:

'Dear Madam:

The future of the country comes above all else and no step can be too drastic for that.
1. Let the people vote for programs, not persons.
2. Then let persons come forward to implement the programs.
3. If more than one person wants to implement the programs, let the people vote or let collaborative managements be formed.'

The C.I.A. rushed this letter to her. Her response, in the news a few hours later, was 'What are these programs that cannot be implemented with me?'

My letter was meant to suggest that the elections be halted and the people be asked to vote for programs, not persons. But she misunderstood me.

I had only written to her as Prime Minister and did not write to her when she was out of office.

My first letter to Indira Gandhi, in the middle of 1975, after she had declared a state of Emergency, jailed thousands of political opponents, suspended civil liberties and Constitutional rights, etc. and after I saw her bite her lip like a shy girl to appease the Americans in a Sunday noon time interview on American TV (see above), had begun "Dear Mrs. Gandhi: I have noted with interest your recent statements re limitations of the concept of liberty ..." and, besides enclosing a paperback copy of B. F. Skinner's 'Beyond Freedom and Dignity', I had enclosed a copy of my letter to Skinner which said '... there is something in your argument I do not understand. You seem to belittle the Indian culture -- 'it has specialized in control by ignorance and superstition, it does not foster effective action', etc. Yet judged from the criterion of survival, the ultimate value, if I followed you correctly, the traditional Indian culture will win over the Western culture, with its 'progress', hands down. It seems to me almost certainly true that, left to itself, the traditional Indian culture, with all its periodic famines and pestilence, would have gone on forever. On the other hand, it also seems to me almost certainly true that [it is the Western culture that is threatening the survival of mankind]. If new threats -- overpopulation, nuclear bombs, etc., now threaten the Indian populace as well, it is because of contact with Western cultural practices, such as improved medicine ...'. Upon receiving this first letter of mine, Mrs. Indira Gandhi went to my alma mater, I.I.T., Kharagpur (in this first letter I had written 'Please trust my judgment ... I stood first amongst all branches of engineering in the merit ranking exam at I.I.T., Kharagpur in 1961 ... ') to give a convocation address and rebuked Indians abroad for 'running their country down' and said they must not consider these degrees as 'passports for lucrative jobs abroad'. I was literally starving at that time, unable to pay rent or buy the simplest food or even toilet paper, unable to answer the telephone because of harassment by faculty and even clerical staff in the psychology department (see above) who had even induced people at the place where I had been working as a consultant into similar harassment, induced even the post office which served my residence to interfere with my mail, etc., etc. In a letter on December 16 or 17, 1982 to her when she was prime minister again, after she had written about my letter dated July 27, 1982 to her that she was "passing it on to my Principal Secretary to deal with it", without my having heard anything from the Principal Secretary, P. C. Alexander, I described to her the horrendous assault on me by my dentist -- a jew who knew the jews in that psychology department -- the horrible consequences of which I am suffering to this day. All this was occurring when the people in the psychology department, the dentist, etc., knew of my acting as her guide and guru, as did those who committed the later harassment and assaults at Harvard University.

I described to her how I escaped further assault from that dentist only by 'adopting a meek and submissive manner'. After that, news photographs showed her sitting with the U. S. president, Reagan, with a submissive look with downcast eyes, etc. upon which Vajpayee wondered allowed "What were they talking about!". It was Reagan, though, who ordered her assassination by C.I.A.-RAW.

When I was living for six and a half months from November '79 to May '80 in the M.I.T. Student Center library, which used to be open 24-hours, sleeping on the chairs at night and going without food for up to three weeks at a time, when that visiting Tamil Indian completing his Ph.D. in Chemistry paid me five dollars a week for teaching him philosophy of science for a while but stopped after complaining about "discrimination" against Tamils in India, when all the Indians at M.I.T. knew about me and what was happening, an Indian named Govind Singh, who had a Ph.D. in Economics from Clark University and worked in India's Defence Ministry, spoke to me, very aggressively making some personal remark about my clean-shavenness, or lack of it. He had a green card and, to keep it valid, he visited the United States once every year and owned a house in the Boston area, as I was told by an Indian, Nishkam Agarwal, working on his Ph.D. thesis in Economics at M.I.T. (his thesis was on "Poverty" and he was later employed at the World Bank), who had refused to give me shelter for a couple days when the library was going to be closed during Christmas, even after I mentioned to him I was an Agarwal, hoping that a variable like this might evoke some solidarity in an Indian. Govind Sharan Singh had excellent English but was a Hindi enthusiast, too. We had several conversations, only in English. He once suggested to me, to my surprise, that I should have "followers"; apparently the Indians at M.I.T. considered me a potential guru of some sort, though all I had done was very mainstream research in mainstream American psychology and suffered racially motivated harassment; I did not think it made me a guru or any thing but a mainstream scientist. At one point I said about the Americans something like 'their bottom line is violence' and that "They will have to be physically subdued". Upon that he remarked on my being "fearless". But he wanted me to consider my persecution by the Americans a blessing that will make me stronger and not blame Americans for any thing because in India people used to be "flayed" (skinned alive), etc. and, so, subjected to similar cruelties. All our conversations were started by him approaching me at the cubicle-like desk where I had my books and where I used to sleep on the chairs at night. When I said about Indians "Those who could have protected us are their servants!", he stopped approaching and talking to me for a while. Then after a few days he came and when I said something about the United States being able to nuke India without India being able to do anything about it, he said something about there being a thing called a "deterrent"; I knew about deterrents but just because there is a concept in political science called a deterrent, that did not mean India had a deterrent; I abruptly stood up terminating the conversation. He, in a dominant fashion, put the palm of his hand on my shoulder 2-3 times and left. Before this, he said he had approached me the first time because I was "hovering" in the student coffee house under the library, perhaps seeing some curiosity in my face on seeing another Indian there. After that last conversation, which I abruptly ended, standing up on his patronisingly telling me about there being a thing called a deterrent, he never spoke to me but, like several other Indians, pretended to nap in a nearby cubicle to give himself 'deniability' about knowing I was living and sleeping in that library.

ADDED ON MAY 22, 2009: The ability of India's missile men to "get paid, make babies, chase girls" will not be adversely affected if they obey India's sovereign and destroy the traitors in New Delhi who are now having a free run; quite to the contrary. The resources available to DRDO will be vastly increased, as will India's power and prosperity.

They must remember he is more than India's sovereign. He is also Dispenser of India's Destiny ("Bharat Bhagya Vidhata") who will decide whether Indians should be allowed to occupy space on this planet (see above). Considering Indians' behavior described above and below, this is no idle question. Have a public discussion if you want and provide inputs as to why Indians should be allowed to occupy space on this planet, as I have said above.

When I wrote to Indira Gandhi "Please trust my judgment", I was referring to myself as a judge. A judge has to be impartial.

ADDED ON JUNE 3, 2009: Evidence of K. Subrahmanyam Being a C.I.A. Agent:
Click on http://groups.google.com/group/bharatvadi-forum/web/evidence-of-k-subrahmanyam-being-a-c-i-a-agent
- or copy & paste it into your browser's address bar if that doesn't
work.
Click on http://groups.google.com/group/bharatvadi-forum/browse_thread/thread/b83ebcdc80e2c2c1

ADDED ON JUNE 9, 2009: The following are posts I made on Bharatvadi Forum ( http://groups.google.com/group/bharatvadi-forum/browse_thread/thread/dec5f2fb623d2d1a ):-
----------------------------------------------------------
As I have said (see my page 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.'), all the moderators and the vast majority of the posts -- 90% or more -- on Bharat-Rakshak are by operatives of C.I.A.-RAW whose agenda is to keep Indians' focus on fighting Muslims -- internal and external -- and China and away from any thought of defending against the real enemy, the white countries and, in particular, the most powerful white country, the United States. Going to India-Forum.com is no solution because some of the same people (such as ramana) control that forum and exercise the same kind of censorship against any Bharatvadi issues -- whether it is 'Nuclear Supremacy for india Over U.S.', or the traitors in New Delhi -- RAW, politicians of all stripes, civil servants, the military, etc. -- who keep India in servitude to the white man (see my other posts on Bharatvadi Forum). Keeping the missile and space pages -- to take an example -- on Bharat-Rakshak gives legitimacy to that forum and so serves the purposes of India's enemies. Bringing them here will stop doing that.
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Bharat-Rakshak, the United States is routinely referred to as Uncle or Unkil, possibly started by the same C.I.A. operative who started calling traitor K. Subrahmanyam (see my post on him on Bharatvadi Forum) 'Bhishma Pitamah'. No matter how you spell it, it presumptively gives the United States the status of a guardian, an elder/superior, an authority figure, etc. etc. The Italian woman is routinely referred to as 'Rajmata'; even while being 'sarcastic', such usage gives her the status of a Rajmata. Despite all that I have written about the perils of importing electronic equipment, the import of the AWACS from Israel has gone unopposed and there is no shame in importing billions in arms from a country of six million, quite aside from the deadly effects of such imports -- from whatever country -- I have written about. I have said repeatedly Indians are cockroaches -- I mean the 'defenders' of India on Bharat Rakshak particularly -- and have pointed out how last April, in an interview to Esquire magazine, the U.S. commander of its Central Command said regarding Indians and such "These guys are ants. When the time comes you crush them". Bharat- Rakshak, which helps keep Indians as ants, is an instrument of C.I.A.- RAW against India.
----------------------------------------------------------
In the above post, I had edited out a sentence saying "The least abusive reference to me by moderators on Bharat Rakshak I have seen is "fella" ". Within minutes after that, RAW posted a 'comment' on the following article of mine --since I referred to the deadly consequences of importing defence equipment in the post above -- on merinews saying something like 'You are a true Indian Sir'. It has tried in the past to substitute the abuse posted by its operatives on my blogs with "sirjee", etc. But what I said in that article, reproduced below, remains a burning issue but you will not find that on Bharat Rakshak :-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­---
DEFENCE SCIENTISTS, such as those in the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) are India’s real warriors, and not the military ones. In the old days, the sword-makers could make the swords, but warriors had to wield them. Even today’s tanks and fighter planes need warriors to drive or fly them. But DRDO, along with the nuclear scientists and production units such as Bharat Dynamics, can make nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles and the people who do the research and development and production can also push the button to send them off to obliterate the enemy.
The military muscle from nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) is millions of times greater than the power of tanks and fighter planes. The scientists and engineers are also the real soldiers. They should have their hand on the nuclear button, not the military or the politicians. The military simply obeys the politicians and India’s politicians are all traitors on the payrolls of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA - an American intelligence agency) etc.
The military is not needed to launch the nuclear-tipped ICBMs as that can be done by scientists and engineers pushing a button sitting at a desk. The tanks and fighter planes the military can drive/fly are insignificant and nearly worthless in the military power they provide. Since they (the military) also obey the traitor politicians and civil servants, they are worse than worthless. It is time scientists and engineers are recognised for what they are - the true defenders and guardians of the country.
The military should obey and take orders from the DRDO. The same goes for civil servants and politicians. This can be done by amending the Constitution; but the politicians will not agree to amending the Constitution, so it will have to be done in other ways.
For India to survive, the defence scientists and engineers have to take control of India’s government. In taking control of India’s government, the rule is that anyone in the government who is not oriented towards and committed to supremacy over America - the most powerful white country - is oriented towards and committed to slavery to America and is a traitor deserving death. The orientation toward and commitment to supremacy over America must be vocal and explicit. At present, Indian government (all civil servants from the top to the bottom) consists of traitors.
In connection with the nuclear deal and a lot of other issues, Indians constantly wail about ’technology denial’ and justify going into the slavery of America via, for example, the nuclear deal by saying that it will end the ’sanctions’ and ’technology denial’ that India is at present subjected to. This shows utter ignorance of what is the real source of strength of a nation. Even if foreign nuclear technology were offered to India on a platter, with no strings attached and free of charge, it will be like poison and should be shunned like poison, because it eliminates or reduces the opportunities, investments and efforts for indigenous development of the technologies.
The most precious thing and the source of real strength in the nuclear area, or any other area, is the skills and capabilities you develop through indigenous research and development. An example I have given is of plans to spend two and a half billion dollars on an Israeli medium range air-defence missile ’because the indigenous Akash programme has not delivered on time’ - without spending even a tenth of that amount on the Akash programme.
This plan seemed to have been abandoned after I pointed out the folly of this, but the same folly keeps being repeated in numerous other areas, both defence-related and others. Often it is not folly but treason, because the politicians and others stand to get huge kickbacks by importing from other countries and keeping India dependent on foreign countries and CIA-Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), which is India’s real ’government’, strenuously promotes such dependence in all areas. Over ten billion dollars are to be spent on importing 126 fighter planes ’because the indigenous LCA programme has not delivered on time’ - though nowhere near this amount has been spent on the LCA programme.
Even in countries with many generations of experience and technological capabilities in developing jet engines, the development of a new jet engine costs several billions - perhaps four billion dollars. It would have been far better to invest $10 billion (or more, because whereas foreign manufacturers have many generations of investment and experience to draw upon and technological support from the rest of their industrial base available, India has to develop many more technologies that have not yet been developed indigenously) on indigenous research and development and production.
As finance minister during 1991-95, Manmohan Singh drastically slashed funding to the nuclear power programme, disabling new projects and halting uranium exploration. But as Prime Minister, Singh has become 'such a fervent advocate of importing high-priced reactors for electricity that he has brought his own political future under a cloud' [ added by me today: a so called strategic analyst wrote a sentence like that but this 'strategic analyst' is now a fervent supporter of American overlordship over the Indian subcontinent; see my page 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' on Bharatvadi Forum for how Indian politicians, media, 'strategic analysts', scientists, etc. have been bought by C.I.A.-RAW; in my post about K. Subrahmanyam on Bharatvadi Forum I have reproduced the offer by K. Subrahmanyam and C.I.A. Director Michael Hayden on August 10 and 11, 2008 to transfer one crore rupees into my bank account within 48 hours of my agreeing to cooperate in 'the cause of Indo-US friendship'; their switching to 'sirjee', etc. from the usual abuse is another way they have tried to bribe me]. As a column in The Telegraph a few months ago showed, Manmohan Singh was the CIA’s appointee as finance minister in the PV Narasimha Rao’s cabinet. He was trying to kill off or restrict India’s nuclear capabilities then on the CIA’s orders and he is doing so on a much bigger scale now, on CIA’s orders only. Despite DRDO’s emphatic statements that it does not need foreign collaboration for its missile defence programme, RAW has forced American ’collaboration’ - from Lockheed Martin - down its throat. For example in developing the Imaging Infrared Seeker (IIR Seeker) for India’s program for defence against ICBMs. The purpose is to bring India’s defences against American ICBMs under American scrutiny and control, rendering India defenceless against American ICBMs. I had said that India’s ballistic missile defence (BMD) will be considerably superior to America’s and avoiding foreign ’help’ was essential for India’s nuclear supremacy over America.

Such problems will only be solved and India’s survival will only be assured by bringing defence scientists in control of India’s government.
----------------------------------------------------------
By the way, an Indian missile man on Bharat Rakshak does not know it but a recent laudatory communication he received from an American missile expert was at the instigation of the C.I.A. -- it was like C.I.A.-RAW switching from abuse to 'sirjee' etc. to change my disposition -- and was meant to make the missile man's disposition toward the American enemy more positive so the United States will not suffer the nuclear annihilation of Washington and New York by India's nuclear-armed missiles. It is a variation on the theme of 'the bribery of contact' I have discussed on my page titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' on Bharatvadi Forum. In my statements to the press a couple of years ago, I had said the Opposition parties should not allow Parliament to function until the nuclear deal is dropped. This was just before a session of Parliament started and, on the opening day, the Samajvadi Party MPs in Parliament trooped into the well of the house at the very start and started shouting "Nuclear Deal -- Vapas Lo!", etc. and made it impossible for Parliament to function, forcing it to adjourn. This continued over a number of days. Then C.I.A.-RAW brought Samajwadi Party's Amar Singh to the United States and, among many other things, gave him a really royal treatment in a medical facility in Denver, etc. This was so successful in changing his disposition that it was the Samajwadi Party which enabled Manmohan Singh to survive the confidence motion on the nuclear deal. I could multiply this example hundreds of times. In the page titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' on Bharatvadi Forum I have described how V. S. Arunachalam, who had a role in launching the Integrated Guided Missile Program in response to my letters of December 1982 to Indira Gandhi as prime minister was brought to Carnegie-Mellon University and turned into a full-fledged traitor, sponsoring Sankhya vahini, etc. and being rewarded with a Padma award as well.
-------------------------------------------------------------
After I wrote about India's Army Chief, Deepak Kapoor, who I said has been bought up by C.I.A.-RAW through K. Subrahmanyam, participating in the sabotage of a recent test of the Brahmos missile, he had gone into hibernation and a post on Bharat-Rakshak described how he was protected by a "tamasha" at least 30 Army commandos when he came to a recent arms expo in Bangalore whereas the other two service chiefs had only one or two personal security men with them. I have written how, with the C.I.A.' hijacking of India (see my post on this subject on Bharatvadi Forum), the traitors in New Delhi are now having a free run. An example of this was Kapoor making a statement a couple days ago complaining that Pakistan was expanding its nuclear arsenal and going beyong a "minimum" deterrence and that the United States should prevent it, etc. This was in support of traitor K. Subrahmanyam's "minimum" deterrent for India and having the United States enforce the capping, rolling back and elimination of India's nuclear arms. The Minister of State for defence, Pallam Raju had once referred to the Army's sabotage to the Arjun tank trials that is described in my post about C.I.A.-RAW's media control on Bharatvadi ForumC.I.A. which can now make the Indian government do whatever it wants. They have declared, according to a document posted by a C.I.A.-RAW moderator named Gerard on Bharat-Rakshak a couple days ago, that the Indian government notified the IAEA on May 11, 2009 that it has completed all the legal and Constitutional requirements to bring the IAEA agreement into force and so it came into force on May 11, 2009 (earlier they were holding back for fear of the consequences) and have already started on the Fissile material Cut-Off Treaty. As I have also said, both the Samajvadi Party and the BSP stampeded after this election to declare "unconditional support" for the Congress party, which the latter disdainfully ignored, to get on the right side of the C.I.A. As I wrote, this is just the start. There is a whole armamentarium of techniques, involving both the carrot and the stick, that C.I.A.-RAW uses to bring and keep a country under its control. India never got out of control of the firangis but now its getting deeper into slavery than it has ever been.
India's missile men should forget about any laudatory communications from India's American enemies and do their job, which is to destroy the traitors in New Delhi, Washington and New York.
------------------------------------------------------------
A part of the sentence about Pallam Raju is missing from the post as it appeared above. It should be: The Minister of State for defence, Pallam Raju had once referred to the Army's sabotage to the Arjun tank trials that is described in my post about C.I.A.-RAW's media control on Bharatvadi Forum but today's news has him repeating Kapoor's complaint about Pakistan going beyond a "minimum" deterrent, etc. As I said in the post on Bharatvadi Forum about the C.I.A. hijacking India through microwaves from satellites, Raju and all the others owe their posts to the C.I.A. which can now make the Indian government do whatever it wants.
------------------------------------------------------------
I have said: "By controlling your behaviour into not using [your nuclear arms], your enemies neutralise them as surely as with any anti-ballistic missile system. It is like neutralizing a bomber aircraft by paralyzing the crew’s ability to press the necessary buttons. There is nothing India needs more urgently than to use its nuclear arms against the United States or its agents in New Delhi."

On December 10, 2005 I said: "One way the United States neutralises Russia's ability to defend itself against its on-going destruction by the United States is seen in a news item on a Russian wire service: "Delegation of Russian Air Force generals to visit USA:...a delegation of Long-Range Aviation generals and senior officers, led by Long-Range Aviation Commander...would arrive in the United States December 11...visit that would last through December 17... ". An item on this government-run wire service, after I referred to the bribery of Russian (and Indian) politicians by the United States, suggested that the "money option" in bringing the Russian armed forces under American control ( "Hut, two, three, four!" ) was being neglected. In a speech (written by RAW) to Indian military commanders a few weeks ago, after my reference to the vanishingly small numbers of arms to be received by the Russian armed forces, India's prime minister referred to "non- military" means of attaining objectives, alluding to my reference to "The effectiveness of high-level bribery in destroying a superpower" (addendum dated August 5 '05 in my page titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' on Bharatvadi Forum). But money is not always necessary; conditioned stimuli-- good food, drink and socialization with the enemy -- can also paralyze your will to act. When, after the first invasion of Iraq (during the second invasion of Iraq, American media reported almost all Iraqi military commanders in the field being successfully contacted with offers of bribes, etc., to not fight; almost all of the fighting was done by Iraqi people's militias in cars and SUVs charging American tanks and being cut down by the tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands to the last man without the Americans suffering a single casualty and without anyone having "blundered"; every Indian school boy reads about the charge of the light brigade but the Iraqi people have been and continue to be infinitely more heroic) by the United States, India's then chief of army staff said "Never fight the United States without nuclear weapons", he was brought to the United States to be 'neutralised' as the Russian generals are (addendum dated August 2 '05, same place as above). Russia's C.I.A.- agent president has direct control of its intercontinental nuclear missiles (when I referred to Vajpayee being a C.I.A. agent, the control of India's nuclear weapons was taken away from him though only for a while). Along with the destruction of its long-range bombers, such trips to the United States are meant to render these forces ineffective and make the Russian people as open to attack by the United States as have been the Iraqi people.
On May 31, 2007, I said: "The Iron Curtain against subversion by the United States was necessary for the military and economic strengthening of the Soviet Union. An Iron Curtain against subversion by the United States now will have to be drawn around the United States. It is possible with leaders with character, which are hard to come by. The Iron Curtain will not be against views but against bribery, including the bribery of contact (a bribe changes the behavior of the bribe-receiver in favor of the bribe-giver; engaging in polite, social intercourse with a mortal enemy of your country-- whom you ought to be vaporizing at the first opportunity-- changes your behavior in favor of the enemy even more powerfully than a monetary bribe and this change generalizes to other times and places when you are not in personal contact). A foolish leader who shakes hands or breaks bread with a mortal enemy of his country is engaging in or changing his behavior in favor of his enemy to an extent that even military conquest and occupation of his country by the enemy cannot accomplish. There are other threats to survival from contact with an evil entity such as the United States. Headline: "US to spend extra $30 bn to fight HIV/Aids, pledges Bush [on May 30 '07]". But it is contact with the United States because of which countries of the world have AIDS in the first place. If you cannot quarantine a rabid dog, you shoot it. Like decoys given out by an ICBM, the United States is skillful at getting "partners" to chase bogus threats (or threats which, like AIDS, originate from itself) and obscure the fact that it is the one threat to the world and mankind. "Identification of friend or foe" is essential to dealing with decoys and so is avoiding identifying an enemy as friend or partner."
Being on Bharat-Rakshak, engaging in polite exchanges with India's enemies that are the moderators and authors of most of the posts there, has an effect similar to that of Russia's long-range aviation officers socializing with people they will be required to annihilate. The annihilation of India's enemies in New Delhi as well as elsewhere (such as on Bharat-Rakshak) is long overdue. Although there are India's enemies all over India, destroying the ones in New Delhi, who are in a position to block India taking any effective steps to destroy its external enemy, will do the job because the destruction of the White Master will eliminate the entity to which the enemies in the rest of India are loyal and from which they draw their inspiration and sustenance.
-------------------------------------------------------------
In a post above, the last paragraph says:
"India's missile men should forget about any laudatory communications from India's American enemies and do their job, which is to destroy the traitors in New Delhi, Washington and New York."
This paragraph is likely to be confusing and does not properly state what I meant to say. The correct statement is:
India's problems can be solved by delivering, in a FIRST STRIKE, just two twenty kiloton warheads, one to Washington and one to New York, with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Instead of first destroying the traitors in New Delhi, then building up India's nuclear arsenal and then destroying the United States, the first strike above on Washington and New York with just two twenty kiloton warheads, one to each, with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation, will bypass the traitors in New Delhi and destroy the United States and this can be done without waiting, with the capabilities India already has.
---------------------------------------------------------------
On April 21, 2009 I said: "The following points need to be emphasized:- 1. The actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times. By controlling your behavior into not using them -- this can be done by physical (including contact), chemical, financial or verbal/ behavioral/psychological means including technological and other ‘aid‘/‘help‘ of various kinds-- your enemies neutralise your nuclear arms as surely as with any anti-ballistic missile systems. 2. Instead of first destroying the traitors in New Delhi, then building up India’s nuclear arms and then destroying the United States, one can by-pass the traitors in New Delhi by delivering just two nuclear warheads, of even twenty kilotons each, one to Washington and one to New York, with the capabilities India already has. 3. There is nothing India needs more urgently than to USE its nuclear arms against the United States."

On April 22, 2009 I said: "I have said that just two nuclear warheads of even twenty kilotons each delivered to Washington and New York will increase India's power millions of times. These will be accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. These two twenty kiloton deliveries will destroy not just these cities but the United States and will be even more effective than multiple warheads in the megaton range delivered to each major city of the United States."
Note the additional point contained in the last sentence "These two twenty kiloton deliveries will destroy not just these cities but the United States and will be even more effective than multiple warheads in the megaton range delivered to each major city of the United States." THINK about what it says and how that is true.
------------------------------------------------------------
It is their use in a FIRST STRIKE that is crucial and makes all the difference.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Also crucial is the warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation.
------------------------------------------------------------
By staying on Bharat-Rakshak, India's missile men are aiding India's enemies. Bringing the missile and space sections here will drastically cut traffic to Bharat-Rakshak and bring it here.
---------------------------------------------------------
Of course, if India's missile men do not have the courage to hit the White Master with the capabilities India already has, they can hit New Delhi with two nuclear bombs, one centered on RAW headquarters and the other on North & South Blocks and hit the White Master after India has built up an arsenal of ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States. If they do not have the courage to do even that, they can just bring the missile and space sections from Bharat-Rakshak to Bharatvadi Forum here so Indians can first get out of the mental slavery being imposed on them through Bharat-Rakshak before they can even think of doing either of the above things.
--------------------------------------------------------------


ADDED ON JUNE 11, 2009: The C.I.A. specialist on India who came on Bharat-Rakshak (see addendum dated March 23, 2008 below) had alluded to how easily intimidated India's missile men are. Even two-bit C.I.A.-RAW operatives on Bharat-Rakshak who serve as moderators there are able to easily bash the missile men around, even threatening them with a ban (as ramana once did) or telling them they are 'jumping up and down like monkeys' (as shiv once did) and now another piece of dog-faeces, a C.I.A.-RAW operative named Gerard who is a moderator there, has posted a list of punishments from the Indian Penal Code to intimidate India's missile men who can't stop sucking up to these flecks of filth and are totally unaware that their power exceeds that of the rest of the Indian state, including all the armed forces, police forces, judiciary, politicians, media, etc., etc. and that the two nuclear warheads delivered to the RAW headquarters and North & South Blocks respectively will put an end to all these traitors who claim to be the Indian state and that POWER -- raw power -- is the foundation of the state. They don't have to be GIVEN authority over these criminal- traitors; with the power of nuclear-armed missiles and the will to use them, it is up to them to EXERCISE the authority they already have in their hands.

Like I said, if they cannot exercise the power of nuclear-armed missiles, they can exercise the power to remove the missile and space sections from Bharat-Rakshak instead of sucking up to India's enemies there.

ADDED ON JUNE 14, 2009: I have said above that POWER -- raw power -- is the foundation of the state and that argument is of no avail. In this connection, here is a post from Bharat-Rakshak:-
----------------------------------------------------------
(By Rahul Mehta) " --- google on "right to revolt" and you will have ample examples
... ".
----------------------------------------------------------
Here is a result of Googling "right to rebel" :-
(From Wikipedia) In political philosophy, the right of revolution (or right of rebellion) is a right or duty, variously stated throughout history, possessed by subjects of a state that justifies their action to overthrow the government to whom the subjects otherwise would owe allegiance.
Doctrines of the right of revolution differ on several dimensions[citation needed]:
Whether the right is owned and exercised individually or collectively.
Whether the acquisition of a right to cast off a government also creates a duty to do so.
Whether the right is subject to restrictive conditions before it becomes effective, such as that the right exists only in the face of tyrannical government.
Whether the right is a result of natural law or of positive law.
.
.
.
China
The right of revolution was perhaps first articulated as part of an official state philosophy by the Zhou Dynasty (1122 – 256 BC) of China[citation needed]. To justify their overthrowing of the earlier Shang Dynasty, the Zhou kings promulgated the concept known as the Mandate of Heaven, that Heaven would bless the authority of a just ruler, but would be displeased and withdraw its mandate from a despotic ruler. The Mandate of Heaven would then transfer to those who would rule best. Chinese historians interpreted a successful revolt as evidence that the Mandate of Heaven had passed on. Throughout Chinese history, rebels who opposed the ruling dynasty made the claim that the Mandate of Heaven had passed, giving them the right to revolt. Ruling dynasties were often uncomfortable with this, and the writings of the Confucian philosopher Mencius (372 – 289 BC) were often suppressed for declaring that the people have the right to overthrow a ruler that did not provide for their needs.
[edit] Islamic Tradition
According to scholar Bernard Lewis, the Qur'an and Sunnah have several points to make on governance regarding the right of revolution in Islam:
The Quran, for example, makes it clear that there is a duty of obedience: "Obey God, obey the Prophet, obey those who hold authority over you." And this is elaborated in a number of sayings attributed to Muhammad. But there are also sayings that put strict limits on the duty of obedience. Two dicta attributed to the Prophet and universally accepted as authentic are indicative. One says, "there is no obedience in sin"; in other words, if the ruler orders something contrary to the divine law, not only is there no duty of obedience, but there is a duty of disobedience. This is more than the right of revolution that appears in Western political thought. It is a duty of revolution, or at least of disobedience and opposition to authority. The other pronouncement, "do not obey a creature against his creator," again clearly limits the authority of the ruler, whatever form of ruler that may be. [1]
[edit] Medieval EuropeThe Magna Carta marks one of the earliest attempts to limit a sovereign's authority and it is seen as a symbol of the rule of law.[2]
In Europe, the right of revolution may be traced back to the Magna Carta, an English charter issued in 1215, that required the King to renounce certain rights and accept that his will could be bound by the law. It included a "security clause" that gave the right to a committee of barons to overrule the will of the King through force if needed. The Magna Carta directly influenced the development of parliamentary democracy and many constitutional documents, such as the United States Constitution.
Thomas Aquinas also wrote of the right to resist tyrannical rule in the Summa Theologica. John of Salisbury advocated direct revolutionary assassination of unethical tyrannical rulers in his Policraticus. Likewise medieval theologian Robert Bellarmine also wrote on the necessity to resist tyrannical rule.
[edit] Use in History
Among the revolutionary movements claimed to seek justification as an exercise of the right of revolution include:
French War Of Religion: The right of revolution was expounded by the Monarchomachs in the context of the French Wars of Religion, and by Huguenots thinkers who legitimized tyrannicides.
Glorious Revolution: The right of revolution formed the basis of the philosophical defense of the Glorious Revolution, when Parliament deposed James II of England in 1688 and replaced him with William III of Orange-Nassau.
American Revolution: The right to revolution would play a large part in the writings of the American revolutionaries. The political tract Common Sense used the concept as an argument for rejection of the British Monarchy and separation from the Empire, as opposed to merely self-government within it. It was also cited in the Declaration of Independence of the United States, when a group of representatives from the various states signed a declaration of independence citing charges against King George III. As the American Declaration of Independence in 1776 expressed it, natural law taught that the people were “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights” and could alter or abolish government “destructive” of those rights.
French Revolution: The right of revolution was also included in the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen during the French Revolution.
.
.
.
-----------------------------------------------------------

For India, I have said:
"Paritranaya Sadhunam
Vinashayacha Dushkritam
Dharma Samsthapanarthaya
Sambhavami Yuge Yuge".

See the files attached to this E-mail for the Dushkritam that need to be destroyed. And all that is said above and below.

Two weeks ago, I had created a page on Bharatvadi Forum titled 'Evidence of K. Subrahmanyam Being a C.I.A. Agent'. Today, when I opened that page, I got a page simply saying 'The page you navigated to does not exist'. I created another page titled 'Evidence of K. Subrahmanyam being a C.I.A. Agent -- recreated on June 14, 2009', using a copy of the page in my computer. The page was 'successfully created' but when I clicked on 'View Page' just a few seconds after creating it, again got a page simply saying 'The page you navigated to does not exist'. I also uploaded 9 files from my computer on 'Evidence of K. Subrahmanyam being a C.I.A. Agent'. But when I view the files, I simply get a page saying 'The page you navigated to does not exist'. There was no problem creating 'pages', viewing them and uploading files 2 weeks ago. Apparently C.I.A.-RAW/K. Subrahmanyam are deleting them or otherwise making them inaccessible. C.I.A.-RAW have all my passwords and often delete and otherwise manipulate the contents of Inboxes, etc. in my E-Mail accounts, besides being able to manipulate the contents posted on various web sites and, like posting comments in my own name on merinews.com on my articles, are deleting, in my own name, pages and files I create on Bharatvadi Forum. As I say in the addendum dated February 26, 2006 on National Security Crisis Due to Microwaves from Satellites, they monitor my computer use at all times and, as I said above on May 13, 14, 16 '09 and on subsequent dates, the C.I.A. has hijacked India with microwaves from satellites.

ADDED ON JUNE 17, 2009: When I referred to "fine wines" in the addendum of May 1, 2009 above, I kept myself from saying what I wanted to say. But I think it is important so I will say it now. The active ingredient is always the same -- the horrible tasting ethyl alcohol. The rest is equally horrible tasting crud. You might as well sniff and taste urine and try to guess whether it is from a pasture-fed or grain-fed animal or what the human ate for breakfast, lunch and dinner before producing it, etc. All the fondness for various alcoholic beverages is the conditioned effects of ethyl alcohol's effects on the nervous system. As for fine cheeses (I eat four fine slices, containing as little carbohydrate or questionable ingredients as possible, or 2 and 2/3 to 2 and 1/2 ounces of cheese every day to provide the necessary animal protein, fat and precursors of important enzymes and hormones, such as tryptophan; as part of its program of harassing me, the C.I.A. contacts whatever grocery stores I go to and induces the owner-managers or suppliers to jack up prices of whatever staples I use two or three fold, besides numerous other kinds of harassment), you can develop a taste for 'fine faeces' depending on how it is marketed.

Once I have totally rid myself (I am almost there) of the diabetes and blood pressure medications imposed on me by the wonderful American medical system, I will be using diet
-- if you include water as a part of diet -- and exercise (walking) only as the incomparably better way of treating -- in fact, getting rid of -- not just diabetes and high blood pressure but other ills -- including eye problems such as inflammation and glaucoma -- which are all caused by the doctors' acts of omission and commission, i.e. are 'iatrogenic'. It is a scandal of the first degree that the practice of medicine is regulated by licensing boards consisting of members of the profession with vested interests in maintaining their financial exploitation of the public and covering up the organized criminal activity in their profession. Two months ago I received a communication from the Massachusetts department which licenses psychologists in support of such organized criminal activity maintained with the help of judges appointed by this crime syndicate; see the addendum of May 1, 2009 above regarding the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court appointed by this crime syndicate and the addendum dated May 5, 2009 above regarding my article "Crime in Psychology and the I.Q. Matter'.

ADDED JUNE 28-AUGUST 26, 2009: I am totally rid of all my diabetes and blood pressure medications (see above). This morning, my blood sugar level before breakfast was 79 mg/dL (up to 125 is considered normal though I consider keeping it below 100 desirable). When I checked my blood pressure two days ago, it was 97/60 mmHg (up to 130/85 is considered normal). The flecks of filth in Washington are arguing about 'reforming' the American healthcare system as they have been doing for the past 17 years. When a fleck of filth from the terrorist regime in Washington brought yet another 'invitation' from a fleck of filth in Washington to a fleck of filth in New Delhi and said they will fight 'terrorism' together, my blood sugar before breakfast went over 100 just for a day, to 114, due to the release of cortisol in my blood stream which can also bring the systolic blood pressure above 130 occasionally, but not as high as it did when I was taking four blood pressure medications.

Regarding the swine flu cases in India: see what I have said, above and below, about the C.I.A. starting AIDS and bird flu in India, etc.

It will take just two deliveries of twenty kilotons each, one to Washington and one to New York, to solve these and all other problems of the world. There is no need to wait for any thing.

Hillary Clinton is NOT welcome to India. She represents a country that is India's number one enemy and must be treated as such.

If Hillary Clinton is assassinated during her India visit by the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) or another such group -- all of which are sponsored and controlled by the C.I.A. via intelligence agencies in the region such as India's RAW, Pakistan's ISI and Bangladesh's intelligence agency though some like the Dawood group are also controlled by it directly -- it will have been done by the C.I.A. Pakistan's Zardari now acknowledges that Pakistan government entities have been using terrorist tactics. What he does not say is that these entities, like similar Indian entities, have been doing it under the sponsorship and control of the C.I.A. as the testimony by a U.S. official to the United States Senate's Foreign Relations Committee, cited above, acknowledged, because Zardari himself, his wife Benazir Bhutto, numerous other 'rulers' of Pakistan and of India, including the current 'ruler', Manmohan Singh -- all hold office under the sponsorship of and at the pleasure of the C.I.A. Elsewhere I have referred to an assassination, by plane crash, of a U.S. Senator the C.I.A. carried out to give George W. Bush a majority in the U.S. Senate. A few months ago, news reports on domestic surveillance by satellite in the U.S. referred to U.S. Senator Strom Thurmond having been under such surveillance for a number of years in the 1980s. This started after the American student who had later distributed my pamphlet at Boston University in 1984 (above) had in 1982, without my prior knowledge or approval, gone to the office of Strom Thurmond -- who was Chairman of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee and in 1981 had acknowledged a telegram of mine about my harassment at Harvard and elsewhere through the C.I.A. -- whose chief aide gave this student a hand-written letter for me offering to start an investigation into the matter "as a favor to" this student who was from Thurmond's home state and a constituent of his (I did not accept the letter and gave it back to the student, making a photocopy for my records). It was to keep the U.S. Senate happy that when Indira Gandhi -- who became prime minister via the C.I.A.-sponsored assassination of Shastri by the KGB -- as prime minister came on a visit to the United States, she appeared, at the suggestion of the C.I.A., to give 'testimony' before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee (she had already used the C.I.A. to assassinate her son, Sanjay, by plane crash as I have described below and, in more detail, elsewhere).

The Uttar Pradesh chief minister refers to herself as "Chamari hoon". But Vajpayee is also a chamar. So is Manmohan Singh. In fact, I find it difficult to think of any one in New Delhi who is not a chamar. This chamar-rajya has been imposed on India by the C.I.A. Uttar Pradesh is my home state; were it not for the C.I.A., there will be no chamar-rajya in Uttar Pradesh and I would be the ruler of India, not just Uttar Pradesh. As it is, a chamari is also the empress of India. The chamari from Washington is NOT welcome to India. In a press release in October, 1987 about the C.I.A.-started AIDS epidemic in India -- to use India's population as guinea pigs for developing an AIDS vaccine for which it got Rajiv Gandhi to agree with threats of exposing the Bofors kickbacks (see below; I have described this in great detail elsewhere) -- when there were only about 500 cases of AIDS infection in India, I had suggested that Indians "Start treating the Americans as mlecchas or untouchables". I sent a copy of this press release to Vajpayee who said "Aap door ki kaudi laate hain", etc. (the C.I.A. had his agreement also to using India's population as guinea pigs for AIDS vaccine development though for the sake of appearances he said he will share it with his colleagues and he had Sadhavi Rithambara speak publicly against the use of India's population as guinea pigs for AIDS vaccine development in response to that telephone conversation with him). It is high time for Indians to start treating the Americans as mlecchas, that is, untouchables, which is what they, in fact, are. In a letter of mine which appeared in the Boston Globe about 18 years ago, I had referred to the fact that the young Mahatma Gandhi was required to do penance and undergo purification before being allowed back into society on his return from England as was Jawaharlal Nehru though only Gandhi complied. This practice must be restored. Only then will chamar-rajya end in India.

There are also bhangis in New Delhi. One bhangi is K. Subrahmanyam who has an article in the Times of India dated July 14, 2009 saying Hillary Clinton "intends to build stage III of the relationship, with India as a key partner helping America shape the 21st century." So America will be the shaper of the 21st century and India will be its helper/assistant. Similarly, he says "This global economic crisis is likely to lead to a new world order where the US must review its strategy to sustain its position as the world's pre-eminent economic, technological and military power. It will need strategic partners. As Clinton said India could be one of the key partners as a democracy and an English-speaking country with the Indian diaspora playing a bridging role." Again, India's role is that of one among a number of assistants which will help America "sustain its position as the world's pre-eminent economic, technological and military power". It is one thing to be a chamar or bhangi. But this bhangi openly works for the C.I.A. (see the files attached to this E-mail). That this bhangi-traitor remains at large and able to publish articles in the Indian press prescribing India's policies shows the nature of this chamar-bhangi-rajya.

A report on the Hindustan Times home page today said Manmohan Singh, in France, wants greater defence and nuclear cooperation with France and said they "will fight terrorism together". I have to say Manmohan Singh is a bhangi, not chamar. After I sent the paragraph above about Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh being chamars, K. Subrahmanyam published an article meant to protect Vajpayee and have Vajpayee protect him. As I said on September 9, 2005 below "The sole purpose of Clinton's September 8 '05 visit to India was to secretly confer with C.I.A.- asset Vajpayee about future strategy following my remarks of September 2 '05, above; everything else was a smoke-screen. In particular, Clinton's visit resulted in greatly increased financial support from the C.I.A. to Vajpayee, enabling him to take an aggressive stance to assert his control over his party by greatly increasing bribes of C.I.A. money to party members". I have to say Vajpayee also is a bhangi, not chamar. This is what I said [below] on September 2, 2005: "It is common in India for legislators to receive 'American money'. Even if a thousand legislators and other officials receive a thousand dollars a month (which is several times their Indian salaries), it costs only a million dollars a month. They depend on American money, via their C.I.A.-supported leaders, for election expenses, etc. The same is done in Russia. The C.I.A. increasingly controls the Russian media (the placement of many C.I.A.-supplied headlines and stories on the major wire services shows hour-by-hour management of the Russian president by the C.I.A.), as it controls Indian media through the Research and Analysis Wing which functions as a branch of the C.I.A."

The chamari in Washington is not in the least bit deterred by being told she is not welcome to India. A nuclear strike on New Delhi with two twenty kiloton warheads during her New Delhi visit will take care of the problems she brings.

The atrocities on India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian by the C.I.A., the rest of the American government, media, etc., etc., with the fullest participation of RAW and the rest of the Indian government, politicians, media, etc., etc., have not evoked the slightest outrage, a single arrest, any uproar in Parliament, a single media report or any thing else in India and they have been continuing thus for the past 32 years and continue to this day. The chamari in Washington and her husband are the fullest participants in these crimes as is the chamari in Lucknow and her regime, not to speak of the chamari at 10 Janpath. If the chamari from Washington comes, her genitals should be cut out and force-fed to her husband the next time he comes to India to deliver bribes to Indian politicians. The chamari at 10 Janpath should have her genitals cut out and force-fed to the honorable members of Parliament. The chamari in Lucknow should have her genitals cut out and force-fed to her Brahmin aides. The chamari that is Sushma Swaraj should have her genitals cut out and force-fed to Vajpayee and Advani. The chamari in Rashtrapati Bhavan should have her genitals cut out and force-fed to the chamari at 10 Janpath. The bhangan who is Speaker of the Lok Sabha should be made to clean it all up.

Of course, none of the above is a substitute for effective action. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will go ahead.

Now I can eat carbohydrate -- dalia or farina made with plain milk -- and still have good blood sugar levels, or roti or paratha for that matter (though, since I don't have a kitchen, just a slow cooker and microwave oven in my small cramped room, I will have to buy them ready-made; I prefer dalia). Since I have seldom owned a car, getting exercise -- walking -- is no problem. Someone I knew well who got a science degree from Benares Hindu University around 1932 used to tell a story about its founder, Mahamana Madan Mohan Malaviya. He was due to address a public meeting and some one came to fetch him. Pointing to his kurta drying in the sun he said "Mera kurta sookh raha hai" (which he had just washed as people in India do and wear it again after bathing) and he will be right there. I bet in the Indian sun it took no longer to dry than it would have in an American dryer (written while I wait for my laundry to dry in an American dryer in a laundromat). Dalia, not fine faeces. Water (one and a half liter first thing on getting up in the morning, with no food or drink for at least an hour after that and one and a half liter in the evening, at least four hours after the last meal, with no food or drink for at least an hour after that; see 'Usha Paana Chikitsa' at http://www.ourkarnataka.com/Articles/yoga/health_tips_water.htm; or the books by Dr. F. Batmanghelidj, 'You're Not Sick, You're Thirsty!' 'Your Body's Many Cries For Water', etc., available from Amazon.com), not soda water. Walking, not driving, not even a Nano. And you will have no life-style diseases and most other diseases. Since the C.I.A., which made me totally blind for two years by tampering with an eye medication (I don't need any now) in transit and RAW, which killed Gen. B. C. Joshi for showing my 'influence' in his comments about higher education, are rampant in India, there are risks to even the healthiest life-style (I had to switch from a digital scale to a mechanical scale to weigh myself because the C.I.A. was manipulating readings by microwaves from satellites). But if Indians refuse to meet the chamari from Washington and treat her like the untouchable she is, they can reduce such risks, though they will only be eliminated by treating the United States as India's number one enemy, which is what it is and destroying it, which India can do without waiting for any thing.

An editorial in the New York Times of July 18, 2009 starts "The Bush administration and Congress rewrote American and international rules to allow India — a longtime nuclear scofflaw — to buy fuel and technology for its civilian nuclear program". The C.I.A.-RAW mouthpiece, Times of India, has spun this editorial with a report on it headed "India should behave like major world power: NYT". The most guilty in all this are India's dhimmi (I saw this term on Bharat-Rakshak; I think it roughly means dim-witted) missile men who have not yet launched two 17-kiloton warheads at Washington and New York which will destroy this enemy. They are wasting precious time arguing with Indians on the C.I.A.'s payroll -- which include the moderators on Bharat Rakshak -- who are rapidly bringing India into the deepest slavery to this enemy instead of either destroying Washington and New York directly or destroying the traitors in New Delhi and then destroying the United States.

It is dangerous ignorance for anyone to say that a laser facility such as the United States' National Ignition Facility, howsoever useful, can substitute for explosive tests of nuclear warheads. India must carry out explosive tests of light-weight high-yield thermonuclear warheads, to their full yields, without waiting. But it is also dangerous not to use the warheads India already has to destroy its enemies by destroying Washington and New York or destroying the traitors in New Delhi and then destroying the United States. Or to continue to collaborate with India's enemies in New Delhi in their crimes against India, as India's missile men are doing.

India's missile men have neither the knowledge, nor intelligence, nor courage, nor character, to do any thing on their own; they can only obey India's legitimate ruler, which is myself. I have repeatedly stated what I want done.

See, for example, what I have said about the undesirability of importing any military equipment and the desirability of pumping the money into indigenous research and development, instead. And the desirability of focusing on nuclear-tipped missiles than on tanks and fighter planes. And the undesirability of importing any nuclear fuel or technology. And the desirability of focusing on the military use of nuclear resources. And India's unlimited nuclear resources, including unlimited uranium from the sea.

Asserting that the United States faces a threat from "South Asia" (meaning India) by way of "climate change" similar to that from terrorism, the chairman of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee is proclaiming U.S. intent to invade India to overtly colonise it and impose the nuclear deal on it, which began with the U.S. assertion of colonial jurisdiction over India when it said U.S. officials did not need papers to come to India after the terrorist strikes in Mumbai in November '08 and which has continued with a U.S. airline reaffirming its commitment to continue to enforce U.S. Transportation Security Administration rules in India in violation of Indian law (as in the case of U.S. asserting colonial jurisdiction over India in November '08, C.I.A.-RAW is hiding this from Indians with news reports of the airline 'apologizing' to an Indian for any 'inconvenience' caused while obscuring the fact that the airline said in the same statement that it will continue to enforce the TSA rule in India as before and will frisk him again before boarding the plane if he travels to the U.S. again). I have said that the 'nuclear deal' is a way of doing 'peacefully' what the U.S. will otherwise impose by military means and the use of India's nuclear weapons in a first strike on the United States is the key to victory. Not to carry out, without delay, a full range test of Indian missiles being able to deliver a nuclear warhead to Washington and New York will be the highest treason.

Note that the report on the nuclear deal that Obama transmitted on July 21, 2009 to the U.S. Congress contains "Classified information associated with these issues ... in a separate classified annex". It contains the 'understandings, 'arrangements', etc. with the traitors in New Delhi and other provisions hidden from Indians. The "commitment to complete all steps of the nuclear deal" is the commitment to impose the slavery on India even if India does not want to buy any U.S. nuclear fuel, technology or equipment (the report was sent to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee after which its chairman referred to invading and militarily imposing overt colonial rule over India on grounds of the threat from "climate change" as has been done over Afghanistan and Pakistan on the grounds of "terrorism"; the cooperation of India's army chief has been obtained for attacks on India as has been that of Pakistan's army chief, etc., for U.S. attacks on Pakistan). The report also provides "developments that relate to India's nuclear related activities", which is acts of treason and sabotage of the nuclear program the Indian government has already secretly carried out. This 'government' cannot be allowed to continue in office nor a government of other political parties which have all been bought by the United States. Failing to obey India's legitimate ruler in removing these traitors will also be the highest treason. The chamari from Washington has just said "Iran and North Korea will face severe consequences if they do not abandon their nuclear ambitions". This applies just as much to India, as the New York Times editorial reference to India as a "longtime nuclear scofflaw" said. India's missile men must not allow themselves to be bought as India's nuclear scientists, such as Kakodkar, have been bought.

On March 3, 2006 below, I referred to U.S. security's frisking of Manmohan Singh at Palam airport when he went to receive Bush. When P. V. Narasimha Rao as prime minister went to the United States on a state visit, the head of the Special Protection Group was thrown to the floor and handcuffed when he insisted on taking his pistol with him on Rao's plane. Even the U.S.-appointed puppet/slave presidents of U.S.-occupied Iraq and Afghanistan receive 'protocol' (guards of honor, etc.) when they come to the U.S. The traitor members of India's parliament are exercised over protocol but not about a real difference in power between India and the United States which they do everything possible to make worse. By their behavior -- such as collaborating to the hilt in U.S. crimes against India -- they shout from roof tops their inferiority. Isn't Indian members of parliament going to a U.S. university to be "trained" the behavior of inferiors on their part? Attached to this E-Mail is evidence of K. Subrahmanyam being a C.I.A. agent; has he been arrested and charged with treason? India lends hundreds of billions of dollars to the U.S. by buying (worthless) American government bonds but these traitors impose the role of beggar on India by borrowing a few billion here and a few billion there from the World Bank, etc. In return for their treason they get 'protocol' and bribes from the white master. India's missile men must stop collaborating, by omission and commission, in their crimes against India and India's legitimate ruler and start obeying him, in their own best interests even if they do not care about India's interests.

The behavior of India's missile men may be no worse and a lot better than that of Indian politicians, civil servants, army chief, etc. But only nuclear-armed missiles are crucial and needed for defending India against the United States by destroying this enemy. Therefore, their role is unlike any one else in government. Manmohan Singh or K. Subrahmanyam and thousands of others can continue their behavior as traitors; it matters little for India's victory over its enemy. But the behavior of India's missile men matters. They have a special responsibility and have to be held accountable like no one else. Doing what they need to do involves no sacrifice and a lot of gain for them as well as India. They cannot continue on a path of least resistance. Disrespect for India's legitimate ruler will have a lot more serious consequences than, say, disrespect for A. P. J. Abdul Kalam who got his job in India's missile program thanks to India's legitimate ruler; see the letter dated May 15, 2004 below. The current incumbents in India's missile program similarly have their jobs thanks to India's legitimate ruler. Kalam failed to obey India's legitimate ruler in the matter of the nuclear deal. Such disobedience must not continue. In the matter of Kalam being frisked by an American airline, it is relevant that Kalam did nothing to protect India's honor -- his personal humility is irrelevant -- and meekly submitted. Such a person has no ability to protect India's interests and is unfit to be in any leadership position. This is true of all of India's 'leaders' such as Manmohan Singh. There is no Indian other than myself who has been protecting India's interests and is India's natural and legitimate leader/ruler. India's enemies know this and have targeted him for the past 32 years, spending hundreds of millions of dollars a year on 'neutralizing' him. But India's missile men must obey him because of their crucial role, regardless of what other Indians do. RAW is the instrument by which India's enemy, the United States, rules India. If they find it more convenient, India's missile men can launch a sub-kiloton nuclear warhead at the RAW headquarters and launch a 17-kiloton warhead at North and South Blocks if necessary.

The Soviet Union had no dearth of nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) but it was brought down by its enemy by controlling the behavior of the Soviets in various ways. India's launch of such a submarine has little utility if it does not enable India to destroy its enemy, the United States, in a timely fashion. An SSBN is just a means of delivering nuclear weapons at the enemy. The focus on the launch of India's nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed submarine can be fatally injurious to India if it prevents a focus on who the enemy is, how soon the enemy has to be destroyed, what is the quickest and most convenient way of destroying the enemy -- that is, the quickest and most convenient way of delivering nuclear bombs to targets in the United States. Like paying a lot of attention to tanks and fighter planes, a lot of attention to very slowly produced means of delivering nuclear weapons which take an enormous amount of time and attention to build is a fatal mistake. Indians never look beyond weapons invented and used by the white master -- tanks, fighter planes, SSBNs -- with no thought given to finding solutions that will destroy the enemy quickly, in a timely fashion. I have already stated the necessity to focus on road-mobile missiles that can be produced and used quickly for a first strike on the United States. The focus has to be on accomplishing your objective in the most efficient way. The focus on SSBNs is not only not efficient but fatal, especially when even the enemy to be destroyed is not correctly identified (which is the United States rather than Pakistan or China) and there is no focus on the necessity for a first strike on the United States at the earliest possible date. If C.I.A.-RAW were trying to keep India from taking effective action against its enemy, the United States, as they in fact do, the focus on SSBNs does a good job. As I have said, this does not mean India should not produce SSBNs or curtail the program for producing them, just that the focus should be on road-mobile missiles for use in a first strike on the United States, on carrying out, without waiting, tests of light-weight, high-yield thermonuclear warheads and on testing its land-based missiles to their full range to deliver a single nuclear warhead to Washington, New York and other U.S. cities. This last takes precedence over every thing else because India has tested warheads of around 17-kilotons but has not tested its missiles to deliver them to Washington and New York. Although India has no shortage of funds, the focus on buying ten billion dollars worth of fighter planes from abroad is similarly self-destructive; nothing else matters except missiles capable of delivering nuclear warheads to Washington, New York and other U.S. cities and, if necessary, first destroying the traitors in New Delhi who stand in the way. Getting external 'help' to build SSBNs, rather than finding innovative, indigenous solutions to achieve objectives is part of the tactics of India's enemies. By all means build SSBNs; but don't lose sight of the objective and the most efficient way of achieving it. Failing to do so is also the highest treason. Up to now India's missile men have shown no commitment to the objective and continue to collaborate with India's enemies, internal and external. This must stop. I have said launching a sub-kiloton nuclear warhead at RAW headquarters must be done if they cannot destroy Washington and New York directly. They can take a route that is most convenient.

Just as Shastri was assassinated by the KGB at the request of the C.I.A. and the head of India's submarine launched ballistic missile program was similarly killed in Moscow (addendum dated December 18, 2008 above), the Russian 'help' for the Indian SSBN program (there are hundreds of Russian 'consultants' on this program in India) was at the request of the C.I.A. , to ensure India never has any such capability before it is thoroughly enslaved through the nuclear deal (which had been in the works for decades, as I have said), the military purchases and equipment monitoring requirements, etc. and, after due delays, it is thoroughly bugged and sabotaged and incapable of doing anything the white masters don't want it to do, like the aircraft carrier and other equipment. The Americans and the Russians work as a team -- a variation of the good cop-bad cop routine -- with help from RAW, which is loyal to both. It is not too late for India's missile men to come to their senses and start obeying India's legitimate ruler.

Recently C.I.A.-RAW made a move to have me IP-banned from Bharat-Rakshak, so I cannot monitor the goings on in India's defence field (earlier they had banned me as a member within a week of my enrolling as a member in November, 2007 and making posts advocating India's nuclear supremacy over the United States and a few months ago they hid some forums from non-members so I could not even read the posts there besides not being able to post). Just now I found that, after I sent the above paragraph to the Indian press, they have IP-banned me so I cannot access Bharat-Rakshak at all and read any of the contents of the web site. It is time for India's missile men to take the missile and space sections away from Bharat-Rakshak to some place like Bharatvadi Forum.

After the above paragraph, C.I.A.-RAW have restored access to Bharat-Rakshak. Now they have started making threatening telephone calls to me to intimidate me. India's missile men can expect being assassinated unless they get off their behind and act with the weapons they have to destroy India's enemies. The time for continuing as usual is over. And simply removing the missile and space sections from Bharat-Rakshak will not suffice.

Nor will a sub-kiloton warhead launched at RAW headquarters suffice. It has to be a 17-kiloton warhead launched at RAW headquarters and a 17-kiloton warhead launched at North and South Blocks.

If India's missiles at present require the U.S.-controlled GPS for accurate delivery, they can launch more than one 17-kiloton warheads at each target to compensate for lack of accuracy. A certain minimum volume of destruction has to be achieved, the more the better. It does not matter how many millions are killed or what exactly is destroyed so long as it is in the New Delhi area (or even if they end up over Delhi), which is a large enough target. The target is a large city, whether inside or outside India, not a specific part of it. Even a few miles' deviation from the intended bull's eye does not matter. Instead of RAW headquarters and North and South Blocks, let the intended bull's eye be the approximate geographical or population center of the city targeted, determined by a look at the city's map; no need to be precise; if some particularly good targets, such as government complexes, are to one side of the population center, the intended bull's eye can be moved a little to that side of the population center, using eye balls and judgment.

I have said that the objective of the nuclear destruction of New Delhi will have been achieved even if the entire population of New Delhi/ Delhi flees and no one is killed. The media are maintaining their cover up. They are welcome to it. The target will be around the population center.

I have said above that the Soviet Union had no dearth of SSBNs, including the mighty Typhoons, but was brought down by its enemy by controlling the behavior of the Soviets in various ways. C.I.A.-RAW is trying to control the behavior of India's missile men, to confuse and delay, pending assassination, by trying to induce pity and horror by posting a video of U.S. strategic bombing victims in North Korea, showing them progress of India's strategic program by giving a privileged look at India's SSBN in the works, etc. These are relevant only as the enemy's countermeasures; the enemy and his agents remain committed to bringing India under the deepest slavery unless the nuclear destruction of New Delhi proceeds without being defeated by countermeasures like such distractions. There is no alternative to obeying India's legitimate ruler who has the necessary knowledge, intelligence, courage and character.

But thanks to the Bhagvad Gita, India's missile men also have the necessary knowledge, intelligence, courage and character.

India's missile men bloody well know who the prime mover of India's strategic program is, in the present as in the past, without whom India is destined to be a country of bhangis cleaning the white man's bottom. But like Indian slaves in all other categories -- politicians, the media, civil servants, the military, academics, the general public, etc. -- they keep a studied silence about it and keep referring to various flecks of ignorant filth when they talk about India's strategic program. This is part of ALL Indians' behavior as collaborators, by acts of omission and commission, with India's enemies in their crimes against India. This must change if they, or India, are to survive.

There is no question that India has nuclear warheads of at least 17-kiloton yield. The point is to have them explode in Washington, New York and other U.S. cities, not how they are carried there. With all its ICBMs, the Soviet Union had nuclear bombs planted in its embassy in Washington, to be exploded if necessary. Israel has nuclear bombs planted in U.S. cities such as New York, as I have shown elsewhere ( http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml ). I have shown above the various ways Pakistan, without ICBMs, can deliver its nuclear bombs to U.S. coastal cities. India's missile men talk about 'getting a shot' at carrying out explosive nuclear tests or the current 'environment' preventing explosive testing. There is absolutely no justification for such slavish behavior. This is the behavior of collaborators with India's enemies. But being collaborators will not save them (Indira and Rajiv Gandhi were collaborators but did not survive), only coming to their senses and obeying India's legitimate ruler.

Compare the infinite ease, speed and economy of pre-positioning India's nuclear bombs in U.S. cities to any other method of getting them there. And India will immediately be a superpower, able to dictate to the United States on any and all matters.

All the C.I.A.-RAW operatives on Bharat-Rakshak have been ordered to create a distraction from the pre-positioning of India's nuclear bombs in U.S. cities by starting a vigorous 'discussion' about the various features of SSBNs and their use. But Indians must focus like a laser beam on pre-positioning their nuclear bombs in U.S. cities.

The pre-positioning of India's nuclear bombs in U.S. cities can be done by special forces. Since the Army chief and others in the armed forces have been co-opted by C.I.A.-RAW, these special forces will have to be specially recruited for this.

In a letter to the press when P. V. Narasimha Rao was prime minister I had said "If P. V. Narasimha Rao had his head chopped off for treason and hung upside down under India Gate, that will approximately meet the requirements of justice. But who is there to do it?" The same applies to Manmohan Singh. The same for Vajpayee.

The silence being maintained by the Indians about pre-positioning India's nuclear bombs in U.S. cities while they continue to squander time and effort on missiles and nuclear submarines shows that the pollution of India's gene pool by the Dravidians is now so far advanced that Indians as a whole are unfit to be allowed to occupy space on this planet and must be euthanized en masse. This can be done by herding Indians into extermination circles and exploding neutron bombs over them, as I have described below (Press Release dated November 7, 2008). It also shows that the Americans must take urgent steps to expel those polluting their gene pool from their midst if mankind is to survive.

It will be a mistake to allow the Indians to live as a source of cheap labor because, as I have shown above, the gene pool can be polluted by mere proximity, without any admixture of blood.

Sharing the Earth with them is also a form of proximity and Indians must be removed from the Earth, not just the United States.

It will take a few hundred extermination circles, into each of which 3-4 million Indians could be herded and a like number of neutron bombs to exterminate them. This can be done quite quickly, in a matter of days.

North Korea has immediately become a superpower, forcing the United States to send Bill Clinton to North Korea and apologize, on the pretext of securing the release of two Chinese-Americans accused of spying, as a result of my proposal to pre-position nuclear bombs in U.S. cities. But, in characteristic fashion, the Indian government not only stole my proposal regarding solar energy (kurta drying in the sun, above) with plans to produce 20 Gigawatts of solar power by 2020 but replaced its funding of 20 billion dollars in Indian government subsidy in the original draft with financial and technological beggary and dependence of 'demanding' the funding and technology from 'developed' countries (The Guardian, August 5, 2009), thus transferring much of the economic and technological benefits and control to the latter -- while continuing to heap the vilest abuse and injuries on me.

(August 6, 2009:) I have said behavior can change genes as genes can change behavior and this is now an accepted fact in biological science. Proximity changes behavior as behavior changes proximity and that is how proximity changes genes. Physical proximity as conventionally understood is just one mechanism of proximity. Hundreds of millions of people watching the same network television program, though widely separated in a conventional sense, are behaving similarly -- perceptual behavior is also behavior -- and, therefore, are in proximity to one another. Through this mechanism, network television has produced substantial changes in the Americans' 'collective unconscious' (using this term from Carl Jung which is largely derived from the Indian concept of the 'Self') because of which Americans react as one to events to a greater extent than they did in the past. Millions of people reading the same book also increase proximity amongst them even though the reading is done at widely separated times as conventionally understood. Generally, mere presence of others, whether in your immediate physical vicinity or on the planet, makes a connection between you and them, affecting your behavior and your genes.

(August 7, 2009) As a result of my reference to the Benares Hindu University science graduate, who wore white khadi and a Gandhi cap all his life, C.I.A.-RAW, which manages its rule over India via the Nehru family, now has its Nehru family gang-rapist candidate for prime ministership wear white kurtas (presumably khadi) and a Gandhi cap. But the B.H.U. science graduate also insisted on traveling "Lower Class" in buses and "Third Class" in trains all his life, even when the local member of Parliament -- it was a seat reserved for Scheduled Castes -- wanted him to travel with him in First Class so they could continue a conversation. Sarojini Naidu had commented on how much it cost to keep the Mahatma in poverty. But that is nothing compared to the hundreds of millions of dollars per year the C.I.A. has been spending for the last 32 years to keep me in poverty. As part of its management of India, besides changing the Returning Officer in midstream and manipulating vote counts when I ran for the Lok Sabha in 1996, C.I.A.-RAW arranged, after the election, for a public meeting expressly for me to address on whatever subjects of national importance I wanted but when I started to speak against India signing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and asking people to join me in opposing it, its operative who organized the meeting promptly, rudely and with hostility stopped me from speaking and dissolved the meeting. Now it is having someone named Kuldeep Dubey ( kuldeepe2009@yahoo.in ) in Bhopal call me repeatedly on landline and cell phone, desperately seeking to speak with me urgently about getting the media to report on the manipulation of vote counts in EVMs by microwaves from satellites in the recent elections in which his uncle lost by a quarter million votes which is unbelievable "as our position was very strong". I sent him an E-mail telling him to start by approaching the newspapers in Bhopal and asking them to report on it and we could talk over the telephone later if necessary (he has this entire sequence of press releases, etc.; RAW then showed my blog had been accessed from inside my Hotmail and Yahoomail Inboxes, to confirm that it can indeed manipulate the contents of my E-Mails and encourage me to talk to him over the telephone) but his RAW-assigned purpose is something else. Well, these press releases go to hundreds of media organs in India and the following is his E-mail:-
---------------------------------------------------
Dear sir,
I read all your blogs regarding nuclear supremacy & your email which u sent to the election commision of india to stop the counting.my uncle fought this election from Guna constituency (Madhya Pradesh) & lost by a very huge difference of votes.it is about 2.5 lacs which is unbelievable as our position was very strong.I m regularly searching for the actual reason for the defeat bcoz i know this was not a genuine election.so pls help me to break this mystery or conspiracy which congress has done with the help of C.I.A.pls giv me your contact no. so i can talk to u further.this is my no. +91 9926653588 (Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India). thanks
sincerely,
kuldeep dubey
(My reply)
Mr. Dubey,I have received your E-Mail below and telephone messages. If you have any specific questions, feel free to ask them by E-Mail. We can talk by telephone later if necessary.Sincerely,Satish Chandra
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:24:48 +0530From: kuldeepe2009@yahoo.inSubject: RE: regarding evm hacking by satellite microwaves.To: satchandra24@hotmail.com
Dear sir,
first of all thanks for replying my mail.Sir i m 100% sure that this election result was manipulated or manufactured by US or cia for congress.But how to open this conspiracy to the media and the people of india.give me the way to prove this.and i want to talk to u also.so pls give me the suitable time when i can call u, so we can discuss some more things regarding this election fraud.sir i can do anything or can go to any extent to bring this conspiracy out in the media.pls help me.thanks
sincerely
kuldeep dubey
(My reply)
You can start by contacting the newspapers in Bhopal and asking them to report on it. SC
----------------------------------------------------

(August 8, 2009) Kuldeep Dubey wanted "proof" about EVM tampering by microwaves from satellites. Well, in these press releases, I have provided proof for all kinds of things -- for example, the attachments to these E-Mails contain proof that K. Subrahmanyam is a C.I.A. agent -- but everyone, including the media, the politicians, the Election Commission, the Supreme Court, etc. etc. are maintaining a cover up of those things. The manipulation of vote counts by microwaves from satellites is an aspect of the rule of C.I.A.-RAW over India. The other things of which a cover up is being maintained, including the fact that K. Subrahmanyam is a C.I.A. agent, are also aspects of the rule of C.I.A.-RAW over India. Providing proof does not mean the end of cover up. The manipulation of vote counts by microwaves from satellites is a relatively new aspect of the rule of C.I.A.-RAW over India. Other aspects, no less serious, of the rule of C.I.A.-RAW over India have existed for decades. If Indians show a willingness to lift the cover up of those other aspects, only then will it be possible to lift the cover up of this particular aspect -- the manipulation of vote counts by microwaves from satellites -- of the rule of C.I.A.-RAW over India.

Indians are a dead, inert mass, ready to be made into atmospheric carbon dioxide. The sooner this is done, the better for all concerned. The world has the resources to do this without waiting. The temporary increase in atmospheric pollution this will cause is far outweighed by the short and long term benefits to mankind, not just of the level of pollution in the external environment but, much more importantly, of the pollution of the internal environment -- the gene pool. If there is life in Indians, it is the life characteristic of a malignant virus that needs to be destroyed as soon as possible. The heat and radiation therapy of a few hundred neutron bombs over a few hundred extermination circles will cure mankind of this affliction. Let us get on with it!

(August 22, 2009) This is what I wrote in a piece titled "Neglected Dangers of Cell Phone Use" in 1999 ( http://www.wave-guide.org/archives/emf-l/Oct1999/Neglected-Dangers-of-Cell-Phone-Use-(Chandra)--.html ) :-
----------------------------------------------------
Date: October 5, 1999
From: Satish Chandra, P. O. Box 2029, Cambridge, MA 02238, U.S.A.
E-Mail: satchandra2@hotmail.

Studies of possible harms to the brain from cell phone use by the Wireless Technology Research Group, meant to be a definitive, industry-wide effort, focus on cancer and genetic damage but miss other, more likely, harmful effects. If I bring my cell phone within a foot and a half of an answering machine, the answering machine starts buzzing. If its radiation has such an effect on the electrical circuits of an answering machine, one can imagine the effects on the far more delicate and vulnerable electrical circuits of the brain which is essentially a bundle of trillions of electrical circuits.

The buzzing of the answering machine at one and a half foot is just one, rather gross, effect observed. Significant, possibly devastating and permanent, disruptions of the functioning of the brain's electrical circuits could occur at much larger distances. These disruptions could keep an Einstein from producing a Theory of Relativity or produce subtle and not so subtle effects on memory and a myriad other brain functions.

Use of a cell phone with a headset, with an ear piece and a microphone, which has been pronounced safe by the project's head, George Carlo, in a press interview (Boston Globe, October 4, 1999, Health/Science section, page C1) keeps the cell phone's antenna just about a foot and a half from the head.

The project head's statement in the press interview above that radiation from cell phones penetrates two to two and a half inches inside the skull and so keeping the cell phone more than two inches away from the head would be safe shows utter ignorance of basic electrical principles. One is aghast at the fact that for six years this scientist has headed a $27 million research effort of a consortium, overseen by scientists at Harvard University, on possible harms of cell phone use.

I had been determined never to use a cell phone even if the phone and the service were free and I was given a stipend to use it but, a few days ago, decided to give it a try, with a headset, but soon switched it off and will use it, if at all, very sparingly.
Sincerely,
Satish Chandra

(The writer, with more higher education than anyone he knew on the Harvard University faculty, has degrees in both Electrical Engineering and Psychology.)
-------------------------------------------------
A headline on the MSN home page today says "Is loneliness unhealthy? : A new study says that women who feel forlorn are at greater risk of developing a disease". It is a matter of proximity to other people.

(August 26, 2009) In 1978, I wrote to Senator Ted Kennedy as follows: "Just a note to voice my support for socialized health care. Even with my background (enclosed resume) I do not have the money to buy health care and have great difficulty supporting my research and myself. I welcome any step that seeks to help the plight of poor people". He wrote back. That letter of mine shaped the rest of his career, made him the "liberal lion" of the U.S. Senate, etc.

ADDED ON OCTOBER 25, 2009: Regarding the 1998 nuclear tests, in the news again, all the C.I.A.-RAW operatives on Bharat-Rakshak (and outside, such as Manmohan Singh and others) are frantically suppressing any discussion of it, locking up the discussion threads, etc. What I said about the 1998 nuclear tests [see "(2nd Expansion) PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 6, 2008" below] bears repeating:
"As for testing, I wrote in 1998, in a letter to the press, about relying on computer simulations alone, without explosive tests, “One could not legitimately rely on an automobile engine developed on that basis, if your life depended on its working the very first time it is ever used, much less a nuclear weapon.” It was because of this letter, as I have mentioned below (in the addendum of August 4 ‘07 to December 6 ‘07), that “Manmohan Singh, leading a Congress Party delegation, said to Vajpayee that some scientists (meaning the undersigned) have expressed reservations about the adequacy of the tests and the latter replied that the Government will go by the advice of the scientists in technical matters…”. The United States has conducted more than a thousand explosive tests and relies on nuclear weapons that have undergone explosive tests. I have said India needs to conduct a few dozen explosive tests of nuclear weapons, to their full yields, in the immediate future, as soon as possible and the tests must not wait for ANYTHING. India needs to test, NOW, not just preserve a “right” to test. Even a facility such as the United States’ National Ignition Facility, howsoever valuable, does not eliminate the need for explosive tests."

It is one thing to say that something is necessary, but that does not suffice to bring that about. I have said that argument is of no avail and repeatedly said what must be done to bring that about -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi without delay. If argument or discussion were enough to deal with all situations, there will be no need for war and this situation requires war. This has to be done by those who have direct, physical possession of India's nuclear weapons -- even one weapon -- and are able to launch them/it -- India's missile men -- not by retired scientists making statements to the press. I do not have direct possession of India's nuclear weapons or my finger on the trigger, any more than Manmohan Singh does. India's missile men do and have the responsibility, unlike anyone else, to launch them. They have all the orders they need and must obey, NOW. They know the alternative.

ADDED ON NOVEMBER 20, 2009: Instead of doing the above, India's missile men appeared on Bharat-Rakshak pleading with the C.I.A.-RAW operatives there and promptly had their posts deleted and themselves banned. They have not grasped the simple fact that what they plead for is in their own hands to bring about and in no one else's and by their delay they continue to inflict incalculable and fatal damage on India, that their failure so far to obey the orders above is the highest treason.

LATER ON NOVEMBER 20, 2009: After the above, the C.I.A.-RAW operatives in New Delhi have made a temporary retreat as always, but nothing will change until the order above is carried out. India's sovereign must be obeyed in form and substance.
While RAW has always been a branch of the C.I.A., the Tamil traitor-enemy Chidambaram has made other Indian intelligence agencies branches of the United States intelligence agencies, bringing in U.S. equipment to India to enable comprehensive real-time monitoring and interception ability for the U.S. of all communications in India, a comprehensive and total censorship power to the United States of not only what gets into the Indian media of all kinds but even communications between individuals, bringing India into a colonial grip of and slavery to the United States such as has never been seen in human history. None of this will be allowed, no nuclear deal in any form, no IAEA inspections of any kind of anything in India, no guards of honour, no state dinners, no representing India for C.I.A.-RAW operatives.

ADDED ON NOVEMBER 21, 2009: The prepositioning of India's nuclear bombs in U.S. cities will proceed without delay; this is the only use of the millions of Indians in the U.S.; I do not know any Indian in the U.S. who is not a traitor to India. Every Indian physicist in the U.S. I know has been recruited by the C.I.A. and is being used by the latter to carry out sabotage against India.

FURTHER ADDED ON NOVEMBER 22, 2009: There is a crucial difference between India's nuclear bombs to be prepositioned in U.S. cities and Israel's nuclear bombs that have been prepositioned in U.S. cities for decades; unlike Israel's bombs, the Indian nuclear bombs will be meant not to gain leverage over the United States but to be exploded to destroy the United States as soon as a certain number have been brought in and prepositioned, ready to be exploded, because first use of nuclear weapons against the United States to destroy it at the earliest possible date is India's strategic objective; the prepositioning of nuclear bombs in U.S. cities makes the realization of this objective possible with infinitely greater ease, speed and economy than by any other method of getting India's nuclear bombs to U.S. cities, such as by Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs). As I said above, it is the FIRST USE of nuclear weapons against the United States, at the earliest possible date, which is crucial and makes possible for India to destroy the United States with the nuclear bombs it has. India is in a race against time for survival and this makes India's victory possible.

As the so-called counter-terrorism pact, which is meant to enable the U.S. to not just monitor but block, in real time, any and all communications in India and will impose on India, in one fell swoop, a comprehensive slavery and helplessness with consequences more draconian than those from the nuclear deal in all areas of life not just nuclear, is due to be signed in the next day or two, the time constraint for accomplishing the above is extremely tight.

The 'space initiative' is meant to take control of India in another strategic area -- as the nuclear deal was meant to take control of India's nuclear program. There are multifarious prongs the U.S. is pursuing to enslave India.

One of the worst of these is bringing American universities to India (see what I have said above about American universities). Kapil Sibal will be publicly tortured in a stadium full of people, disemboweled and dragged around by his intestines around his neck before he is skinned alive and fed to dogs for this and other crimes, along with Manmohan Singh, of course.

ADDED ON NOVEMBER 23, 2009: The criminal Negro slave of the Americans, committing crimes against India with the Indian nigger slave of the Americans, will only be contributing to the length of the latter's public torture and execution; he is welcome to it.

ADDED ON NOVEMBER 27, 2009: To take an example, an Indian physicist at a U.S. university, Mani Tripathi, who does not even try to hide that he is a C.I.A. employee, goes to India very frequently and, on his latest trip, met Banerjee, who is replacing Kakodkar as head of Atomic Energy. Why is he even allowed to enter India? Because Kakodkar and the rest are themselves now C.I.A. employees as is everyone else from Manmohan Singh on down.
Tripathi has had a role in sabotaging the Centre for Advanced Technology which was set up as a crucial part of India's strategic program along with the Integrated Guided Missiles Program as a result of a letter of mine to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December, 1982. He works to replace military parts of India's nuclear program with civilian uses and bring them under American supervision and control.
India is an enemy-occupied country -- occupied by the United States, India's number one enemy. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi is a necessary step to destroying the enemy. India is at war in which victory or defeat will be determined by India's missile men obeying orders or continuing their treason.

ADDED DECEMBER 15-24, 2009: The Tamil traitor-enemy K. Subrahmanyam has been the king pin of C.I.A. operations in India for decades. The attachments to this E-Mail show him, along with the C.I.A. Director, trying to recruit me with an offer to transfer one crore rupees into my bank account immediately, the offer combined with threats. In accordance with the threats, I received a visit from the United States' Joint Terrorism Task Force, sponsored by the United States' Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I.), on November 30, 2009. An F.B.I. man, Steve Morley, did all of the talking while the other man, who did not identify himself, simply glowered [there are many U.S. agencies, including the C.I.A., in the Joint terrorism Task Force]. He said "You know why we are here?" I said "I can guess but why don't you tell me". He said they had been contacted by about thirty U.S. universities about the E-Mail I had sent them; they wanted the F.B.I. to 'check him out'. "You scared them pretty good". He said "Don't do that again" and told me not to contact any U.S. universities in the future. In the addendum dated May 1, 2009 above I have described how U.S. universities function as a crime syndicate. I had E-Mailed my curriculum vitae simultaneously to the presidents of 270 U.S. universities enquiring about a possible "association" with their university; I was first and foremost looking for laboratory facilities to continue my research with rats that I had done earlier but my curriculum vitae also included my work on strategic defence, 'Nuclear Supremacy for India over U.S.' ( http://NuclearSupremacyForIndiaOverUS.blogspot.com ). I asked Steve Morley when was the last such communication from a university and he said it was November 8th. A few hours before their visit the Times of India had reported that the Indian Parliament had "collapsed" that Monday morning which was its first session scheduled after my addendum dated November 27, 2009 above was received in New Delhi late Friday afternoon because 17 members of Parliament whose questions were due to be answered in the Question Hour that day were not present during the Question Hour -- an unprecedented occurrence -- and the Lok Sabha Speaker had to adjourn the House until noon. Evidently it was not the communications from U.S. universities but the "collapse" of the Indian Parliament which had led to their visit (see the threats to me from the C.I.A. Director Michael Hayden and K. Subrahmanyam in the attachments to this E-Mail). After their visit the Indian Parliament and others in New Delhi went back to business as usual. He also asked me if I have any "weapons" down there [I live in a one-room apartment in a basement] and I said I have none. He also apparently asked my Laotian-origin landlady how I am with her because I heard her tell him [I am] "very nice" and, after they left, she reassuringly touched my hand. After asking me a number of questions -- I told him that Strategic Defence has always been a professional interest of mine, that I had worked with General Dynamics/Electronics Division on the F-111 aircraft and, after that, I had done graduate work in Strategic Defence/National Security Policy at the University of Rochester four decades ago -- he said "I am putting it down as a misunderstanding" and, before leaving, that I have the Right to Free Speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, adding that I may have "trouble" with the "Immigration Service", the idea being to deport me to India [for expressing views inimical to U.S. interests] where their Indian servants will finish me off [as I have said they have already robbed me of my money and property in India]. But the criminal K. Subrahmanyam remains out of jail and has free run of the Indian media, while I have been shut out of the Indian media. Why? Because he has made the Army Chief and many others into C.I.A. employees. After practical training at the Atomic Energy Establishment, Trombay, in 1965 I had written to a prominent Opposition member of Parliament -- Madhu Limaye, as I recall -- about the perilous location of the Atomic Energy Establishment, Trombay, which made it open to attack from the sea. It is no accident that so many of India's critical nuclear installations are located in enemy territory -- Tamil Nadu.

External occupiers have been brought into India by the Tamil enemy. When I say India is an enemy-occupied country, it can be elaborated to say India is a Tamil-enemy-occupied country.

The cleansing of India of the Tamil enemy is absolutely vital if India is to survive and remove the external occupier. The battle against the United States is first and foremost a battle against the Tamil enemy.

The Tamil enemy has many disguises and subterfuges. He has had thousands of years of practice in infiltration and sabotage.

Since the enemy has inserted his genes into India's population, the selection of infants at birth for gene expression will be necessary. Infanticide is a very common practice in India and this will pose no problem. This will also relieve the population pressure as India's population has multiplied about six-fold since the so-called 'Independence' in 1947. India's ideal population will be what it was in its golden age two thousand years ago; fifty million will be plenty.

It will not be enough to euthanize over 95% of the infants born in India; over 95% of the adult population will also have to be euthanized because the quality of India's population is so bad. In a letter to the press several years ago, I described how when I first went to Chicago in early 1967 from the University of Illinois on a weekend, the first thing a man sitting on a bench by the lake shore I encountered said, on learning I was from India, "They will have to start killing some of them"; like B. F. Skinner of Harvard University in an article ten years later, he was referring to the United States sending shiploads of food to the starving Indians. Winston Churchill's private secretary, John Colville, wrote in 'The Fringes of Power', "The PM said the Hindus were a foul race "protected by their mere pullulation from the doom that is their due" and he wished Bert Harris could send some of his surplus bombers to destroy them" (this can be found by a Google search with "Churchill pullulation"). A column in The Telegraph of December 21, 2009 says: "A couple of weeks ago, Team India overpowered Sri Lanka and emerged at the top in the International Cricket Council's test rankings. The joy of the country's emerging middle class knew no bounds. A splurge of intense patriotic emotion swept the media: India was on top of the world, the pride and glory of the achievement were to be shared by each and every countryman, this was what national integration was all about. Each member of the Test team was given an instant award of Rs 25 lakh by the Board of Control of Cricket in India. That was peanuts; the more important thing, the cognoscenti agreed, was the fact that the stupendous distinction was won on behalf of the nation ...". It boggles the mind that being number one in cricket is the height of India's national achievement and the anchor of India's national pride. Perhaps a decade ago in a letter to the press I urged supremacy in nuclear-armed submarines, not in cricket. After that, C.I.A.-RAW under K. Subrahmanyam systematically promoted cricket through the media, etc. In view of the Indians' utter lack of response to K. Subrahmanyam trying to recruit me for the C.I.A., documented in the attachments to this E-Mail and India's Agriculture Minister and former Defence Minister being first and foremost a cricket enthusiast in charge of India's cricket, it is hard to find fault with the view expressed either by the American man in Chicago or by Winston Churchill. Can such a nation as India be regarded as anything other than a nation of vermin? India's missile men can rescue India from such a fate -- of having its population euthanized by the Americans -- by killing a few million Indians in New Delhi. The choice is theirs.

From a practical point of view, rather than do a genetic evaluation of each Indian new-born and adult, knowing over 95% of them will have to be euthanized, euthanizing the population of India en masse, as I have said above, is the only solution.

On India-Forum, in the Strategic Security of India section, in the Nuclear Thread, a post describes the situation in India as follows: "The owner is out and the store clerk is pocketing by selling away the store as long as he is on station". To this can be added: "And the security guard with the gun is sitting back chatting while the owner is being mugged and attacked in the street within view."

ADDED ON DECEMBER 25, 2005: The following is an E-Mail I sent on December 25, 2009 individually to each of the 100 members of the United States Senate:-
　
Dear Senator:
I am offering myself as a consultant to you on all subjects. The following are highlights of my achievements:-

Highlights of Achievements:

1. He can reasonably claim to be the foremost behavior scientist in the United States.

2. Laboratory research with rats, using operant conditioning procedures, discovering a new effect drastically modifying biological clocks with theoretical and practical applications to Biology, Medicine and Physics.

3. A new theory of relativity showing how observing organisms can drastically modify properties of the physical world relative to themselves at an everyday level.

4. His theory of money is in the process of revolutionizing Economics and public finance. It was responsible for the Council of Economic Advisers being thrown out of the White House and for Bush's statement in early 2003 that "Both parties in both houses of Congress" now understand that cutting taxes creates jobs (so long as the government does not make a corresponding reduction in the money it spends).

From 1975 on, he informally advised Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on India's domestic policies and international affairs.

The following is my detailed curriculum vitae:-
http://SatishChandraCurriculumVitae.blogspot.com
Sincerely,
Satish Chandra

ADDED ON DECEMBER 27, 2009: A story in The Telegraph of December 28, 2009 on the sex scandal of N. D. Tiwari says that the Italian woman whom C.I.A.-RAW has made India's empress "is known to follow the "public is public, private is private" dictum". But she, along with many others, including the current prime minister, cabinet ministers, etc., has been participating in the C.I.A.'s 24-hour satellite surveillance of me for the past 32 and 1/2 years with its "wholesale invasion of privacy" that I referred to in telegrams to Indira Gandhi as prime minister and to many others in 1981 and all Indian prime ministers have been kept in office by C.I.A.-RAW via the C.I.A.'s satellite surveillance of me for the past 32 and 1/2 years; I have described above and below how this satellite surveillance of me has been used and what its consequences have been and will be.

ADDED DECEMBER 30, 2009 TO JANUARY 10, 2010: If the criminal Negro slave of the Americans wants to survive, he will have to kill the C.I.A. without delay, not an easy task as the C.I.A. kills even U. S. presidents (it killed John F. Kennedy; see the book 'Family of Secrets' by Russ Baker, available from Amazon.com) if they challenge its position as the supreme ruler of the United States and the world. Of course, the supreme ruler of the world is none other than the Lord, who is myself who, when acknowledged thus in form and substance, will bring the population of the world down from six billion plus to no more than 500 million; almost the entire populations of the United States and India will have to be euthanized due to the participation of Americans and Indians in all walks of life in the crimes against the Lord. If the F.B.I. wants to do something about terrorism, it should do something about what I said in my work published under the heading "Terrorism" in a United States newspaper on October 20, 2001 (
http://www.thecurrentonline.com/2.14134/web-submission-terrorism-1.1969806 ), which was included in my E-Mail to U.S. university presidents (addendum of December 15-24, 2009, above): "SEPTEMBER 15, 2001: The worst act of terrorism against the United States is the planting of nuclear weapons in the largest U.S. cities by Israel and its friends in the U.S. ...". And, of course, about the sponsor of terrorism around the world and of all terrorism in the Indian subcontinent, the C.I.A. which routinely murders and harasses U. S. citizens in the United States, not just U.S. presidents, as I know from personal observation (see what I said in SECOND ADDENDUM OF MARCH 15, 2006, below); I came to know of the book by Russ Baker above only a few weeks ago from an interview of the author on U.S. public television station, WGBH, of Boston. The C.I.A. itself was created and is run by Harvard University professors such as J. K. Galbraith and B. F. Skinner which is why U.S. conservative William F. Buckley, whose first job after graduation from Yale was as a C.I.A. agent in Mexico delivering envelopes full of cash to all and sundry, from student leaders to journalists to politicians of all stripes, etc., as he has described in print, said he 'would rather be ruled by the first 100 names in the Boston telephone directory than by Harvard professors' (see addendum dated April 29, 2009 above). Harvard University will have to be eradicated without a trace and all its affiliates and alumni killed. In India, RAW, a branch of the C.I.A., will have to be eradicated without a trace and all its employees and affiliates killed which requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi without delay. If the U.S. Congress wants to do something about healthcare -- the crime syndicate headed by Harvard University controls healthcare -- then all its members will first have to read the books by Dr. F. Batmanghelidj, referred to above, also available from Amazon.com and also read my Brief filed (before I came to know of the work of F. Batmanghelidj) with the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in my case against a Harvard professor, an eye doctor, who tried to make me blind (the C.I.A. later succeeded in making me completely blind for two years by tampering with my Russian-origin eye medication in transit) and others; the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts appointed by the crime syndicate headed by Harvard University (see addendum dated May 1, 2009 above) suppressed my Brief but its copies can be obtained from me by contacting me by E-Mail ( satchandrag@gmail.com ) or telephone (401-603-2998); be forewarned that the C.I.A. routinely interferes with my communications, not just by microwaves from satellites but even the U.S. Postal Service. RAW had arranged for me to be attacked in the streets, first by blacks then by whites and I had to stop going out of the house. It has done so again now in the Providence, R.I. area where I now live and my mobility therefore is very limited as I use walking and buses for transportation, while the Italian woman made the empress of India by C.I.A.-RAW has traffic in much of Delhi/New Delhi stopped and all citizens ordered to face away from the road and toward walls when she travels by road and has plush special jets transport her between places, escorted by thousands of security personnel. The same for India's C.I.A.-appointed prime ministers and many others. India's missile men are complicit in these crimes.

If India's missile men don't come to their senses and start obeying orders, I will recommend flattening all DRDO facilities and killing all DRDO personnel -- an easy task for the United States. India's missile men have a choice -- destroy RAW as I have ordered or be destroyed. There is no time left to dawdle. The criminal Negro slave of the Americans has the same choice -- kill the C.I.A. without delay or be killed by the C.I.A.

Also complicit are the criminals of the Supreme Court who pretended, at the behest of C.I.A.-RAW, to have lost a case I filed after duly acknowledging it; their crime was reported in a front page lead story by 'News India-Times' Weekly of New York because of which its Editor-Publisher, an American and Israeli citizen of Indian origin, was jailed for several years at the behest of C.I.A.-RAW as I have said below. Among hundreds of examples I could cite, I have described below how a Muslim press cartoonist in New Delhi was brutally tortured and murdered by C.I.A.-RAW for a cartoon showing the Italian woman being tossed out of an airplane after I suggested in a letter to the press that she be tossed out of an airplane. As I have said, even before she held any government or party post she was treated like the empress of India and all visiting heads of state were required to call on her where she lived in the prime ministerial residence, even when the BJP was in power. The criminals of the Supreme Court routinely dismiss any complaints about the billions of dollars she has in foreign bank accounts, etc. and the BJP, when charging the bribery of its MPs in the confidence vote on the nuclear deal, took care not to charge her with the bribery though by the accounts of its own MPs who were bribed it was her secretary Ahmed Patel who gave final approval for all payments. The BJP's Advani has been given equally plush jets, thousands of security personnel, etc. as payment for participation in these crimes for which India's missile men must bear the ultimate guilt and punishment as agents of the C.I.A. against India.

If the criminal Negro slave of the Americans thinks the Secret Service will protect him from the C.I.A., compare the frisking of the Indian nigger slave prime minister as he waited to receive Bush at New Delhi's airport, described below, to the laxity with which gate-crashers were allowed to come up to him at the recent State Dinner by the Secret Service which could not give a hoot to protect a Negro slave. On an earlier State Visit, by an Indian nigger slave prime minister named Rao, when the Indian nigger slave head of India's Special Protection Group accompanying him wanted to take his hand gun with him on an airplane, he was thrown to the floor and hand-cuffed "in true American fashion" as an account in an Indian nigger slave newspaper admiringly described it.

When Bush Jr. was president, I pointed out in a letter to the press that an air crash that killed a jewish senator from the Midwest was engineered by the C.I.A. to enable Bush Jr. to take control of the U.S. Senate; as the 'Family of Secrets' points out, Bush Jr. has been a life-long operative of the C.I.A. It was I who had urged Bush Jr., in a letter to the press, to do whatever was necessary to keep control of the U.S. Senate because I considered the jews' control of the country far more deadly; I had made Bush Jr. president to prevent jewish control of the country -- see
http://www.thecurrentonline.com/2.14134/web-submission-terrorism-1.1969806 . If the U.S. Congress has any sense, it will drop everything -- healthcare, wars, terrorism, everything -- and work with the criminal Negro slave to kill the C.I.A. without delay. In a letter to the press I had also pointed out that an air crash that killed Madhavrao Scindia -- a 21-gun salute maharajah under the British and a potential rival to the Italian woman whose white skin, though she was a waitress, and C.I.A.-provided billions of dollars in foreign bank accounts, some of it channeled through the KGB which had often acted as the C.I.A.'s proxy as in the murder of Lal Bahadur Shastri in Tashkent, trumped everything-- of the Congress party was engineered by C.I.A.-RAW to eliminate the potential rival. Since all members of the Indian Parliament are C.I.A. employees, the C.I.A.'s rule over India can only be ended by killing the C.I.A. since India's missile men are now C.I.A. employees.

All the problems of India and, believe it or not, of the United States can be solved by tossing the Italian woman out of an airplane. Since the Italian waitress who is empress of India is a creation of the C.I.A., this requires killing the C.I.A. which only the U.S. Congress can do. Their failure to do so is as deadly for the United States and themselves as it is for India and the rest of the world. I saw some extremely stupid U.S. Congressional hearings on terrorism and no-fly lists and real I.D.s and past I.D.s and what not on C-SPAN yesterday and the rest of Congressional schedule is filled with equally stupid hearings and debates on the Economy and what not when all they can do -- the only thing they can do -- to avoid perdition is listen to and obey the Lord. I saw a Mass by the Pope in St. Peter's Basilica yesterday, January 1, 2010, which was the 43rd World Peace Day or something for them; boy, is the Pope out of touch with the Lord! I had written to the Pope when I was in "dire" economic circumstances after being forced out of Harvard in 1978 but got no answer and some U.S. Cardinals I wrote to replied but took no action. I have quoted William F. Buckley quoting "preacher" Jerry Falwell's "chilling remark" above that "If God allows America to continue, he will owe an apology to Sodom and Gomorrah". When I was assaulted in that Harvard University seminar, the first thought that crossed my mind, along with the image of a salvo of nuclear-armed missiles headed toward India, was "Indians don't deserve to survive". The same seems true of Americans. I had written to the Pope because of the role of the jews as enablers of all the crimes against me, even by the C.I.A., but the United States is merely a Greater Israel and the world of today, including the Vatican, is a jew-occupied world; see http://www.thecurrentonline.com/2.14134/web-submission-terrorism-1.1969806 . Israel can easily be destroyed by nuclear weapons -- even by the nuclear weapons and missiles India already has -- even if the jews explode the nuclear weapons they have planted in the largest U.S. cities such as New York, which will kill more jews and very likely have done or will in Indian cities such as New Delhi. But as I have said in my work above published in thecurrentonline.com , there is a vacuum of leadership in Washington, not to speak of New Delhi and only I can fill it. Harvard University used to have a strict quota to limit the number of jews there and I had suggested in a letter to the press an Amendment of the U.S. Constitution to re-introduce the restrictions medieval Europe had on what the jews could and could not do in society but that led Bush Jr. to launch the second invasion of Iraq; restrictions will not do, only the total destruction of this criminal group/criminal tribe. Curiously, all this can be accomplished by tossing the Italian woman out of an air plane because I will then be the ruler of India. As I have said above, the jews are probably from India's criminal tribes that were expelled or migrated out of India milleniums ago. India's criminal tribes are from the aboriginal people of India -- the Dravidians, as are the various Untouchables now called Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Scrapping India's Constitution, written by an Untouchable and reintroducing the restrictions India had on what the Untouchables could and could not do in society, ending the chamar-rajya in India will automatically end the Italian woman's rule over India because, as an Untouchable in traditional Indian terms, she will be tossed out of the prime-ministerial residence and everything else. This is not only a highly practical solution -- Untouchability continues in rural India where the real India resides -- but a sorely needed one if India is to survive.

Mahatma Gandhi gave the title "The Story of My Experiments With Truth" to his autobiography which is mostly the story of his experiments with diet. It contains ruminations on whether India could have avoided occupations by foreigners if Hindus ate meat. India's vegetarianism is a consequence of the propaganda of pacifism which has been suicidal for India. The Aryans of the Rig Veda ate beef. Along with renouncing the propaganda of pacifism, Indians have to renounce all its consequences, including avoidance of meat and actively promote activities that enhance aggression. Red meat is better than white meat. A few months ago I re-started eating meat, specifically beef. In an article titled "Accelerating India's Development" that appeared in Kashmir Times in 1996-97, I said Indians' poverty, apathy, lack of productiveness, etc. in relation to the West -- which gives relatively free rein to the instinct of aggression -- are all the proper consequences of decisions made thousands of years ago as to what is important and worth pursuing but that when the barbarians press on you, overrun you, engulf you, an adjustment of what to do with aggression may be necessary. I said a village youth is made a soldier in a modern army in a matter of months and the rapid expansion of the Indian army during World Wars I and II shows that many generations can be produced in a short time; let a 'development army' of first ten million, then one hundred million be formed, each soldier equipped with a rifle etc., of course -- no need for foreign investment or technical aid for this -- but different from the regular army in that it will run its own farms and factories to be self-sufficient in all its basic needs. As the most advanced civilisation in the world, Indians can come up with numerous ways to enhance their aggression and establish dominance over the world so Indians can finally "chart their own destiny and possibly save the world". People such as K. Subrahmanyam can be given to the Adi Dravidar to eat raw. Tossing the Italian woman out is the first step, getting rid of the chamar-rajya in Uttar Pradesh is the second step.

A few months ago, the Harvard Square subway station had huge boards and banners all over from a shoe company saying "If you are not fast, you are food", with pictures of various animals ready to make you food. At present, Indians are food for the Americans. So are the Chinese who have been made into slave labour for the American consumer regardless of the propaganda in the Indian press. Killing off all the American agents is the third step. If the Italian woman and K. Subrahmanyam have already been taken care of, this will include Manmohan Singh and the rest of the Indian government, Parliament, Army Chief and other service chiefs, the media people and everyone else in New Delhi one could think of.
This will require the nuclear destruction of New Delhi but India's missile men are themselves American agents. The alternative is re-introducing the restrictions India had on what the Untouchables could and could not do in society which is not only highly practical and essential for India's survival but also mandatory if India's government is to represent the Indian people since, to repeat, Untouchability continues in rural India where the real India resides. Can you find a single member of Parliament, for example, who would recommend re-introducing Untouchability? That is evidence that every member of India's Parliament is an alien agent. The same for all of the other people in New Delhi I have enumerated. What is the evidence that India's missile men are American agents? Here is a post today by India's missile men on India-Forum:-

"Bofors is now owned by massaland (United of US and BAE of UK), so there are not too many games in town.Chicken feed order to USA is OK, but only when it ensures sufficient lifetime spares in stock room and local ammunition factory to make as much ammo as needed.

Nod to US gun purchase minus bids
"
Putting the money into Indian Research and Development is not an option!

A headline says "Get Garg's killer, India tells Australia". But Garg's killer was RAW. It has been clear to me throughout that the attacks on Indians in Australia were being arranged by RAW to reverse the rapid shift of Indian students from the United States to Australia because Indian students going to the United States is a principal source of the United States' control over India; C.I.A.-RAW's principal mouthpiece, The Times of India, has taken the lead in trumpeting the attacks on Indians in Australia for this reason throughout this campaign.

The criminal Negro slave of the Americans has told the American security agencies they "screwed up". I suppose he will tell the C.I.A. it "screwed up" regarding me, not committed a racially-motivated hate crime, the worst crime in the history of mankind, at the behest of a criminal Harvard professor "enraged" by exposure of his plagiarism and defrauding of the Americans and the world (see my letter to the press dated April 28, 2006 in the addendum dated April 29, 2009 above). The crime syndicate of which he was part not only fully participated in the crimes at the time but has continued to compound them over four decades. Since he got his law degree from this crime syndicate, I suppose he will tell the crime syndicate it "screwed up". I got an E-Mail at 2:08 A.M. Eastern time on January 4, 2009 from the chairperson of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence saying "Because of the volume of e-mail that is received by my office, we can only respond to email that includes a California postal address. Please resend the text of your e-mail message, including your postal address, and I will respond to you as soon as possible"; perhaps he will tell the U.S. Senate it "screwed up". Since he does no work himself and relies on the booty from the C.I.A.'s crimes against me (his telling the security agencies they "screwed up" was due to my reference to 'enhancing aggression', above), who will tell the American electorate it "screwed up"? Since the American electorate relies on the slave labour of the Chinese and Indians -- booty brought in by the C.I.A. -- for goods the American consumer consumes, who will tell the Indian electorate it "screwed up"? Since the Indians do no work themselves relying on the work done by me instead, booty brought in by C.I.A.-RAW -- not in Research and Development, not in security, not in education, the Economy or anything else -- it is the Indians who are screwing themselves being nigger slaves of the Americans, instead of obeying me, since they have still not arrested K. Subrahmanyam or done anything about their Dravidian enemies, or the "intelligence" of their "intelligence agencies" which, as branches of the C.I.A., can only be dealt with by the Americans who are being "screwed" by the C.I.A. as the criminal Negro slave of the Americans said.

The attempted bombing of a U.S. jetliner in Detroit is no exception to what I have said about terrorism below and above; it was staged by the C.I.A. as part of its principal means to remain the supreme ruler of the United States and the world and was just like the innumerable terrorist incidents RAW and ISI, branches of the C.I.A., have staged through various C.I.A.-controlled outfits such as the LeT in the Indian subcontinent. The C.I.A. has many such outfits around the world; as I have said below, even the terrorism in Russia has been the handiwork of C.I.A.-controlled entities, including the Russian intelligence agencies. The C.I.A. killed John F. Kennedy and ousted Nixon from office but a white president has at least a chance of killing the C.I.A.; there is no chance of this with a Negro slave president. The disaster that is India because of the genetic pollution of the Aryan stock is the future for America; making president an offspring of a foolish anthropologist marrying a Negro greatly accelerates the process.

India, with its practice of Untouchability, has a chance of saving the world if it attains nuclear supremacy over the United States, which it can.

The biggest service the criminal Negro slave can do to the United States is to resign without delay. If he does not, he must be ousted. Because failure to destroy the C.I.A. -- rubbing it out of existence -- will mean India attaining nuclear supremacy over the United States and the inevitable consequence will be rubbing the United States out of existence. So far as India is concerned, the United States equals the C.I.A. The tyranny of the C.I.A. over India is such as to make this India's one-point agenda.

The United States has established over Afghanistan on a fabricated and flimsy excuse and is establishing over Pakistan full-fledged colonial rule, the aim being establishing such rule over India. The nigger slave prime minister and the rest of the Indian government are collaborators in this. I am telling patriotic Indians "If you are not fast, you are food!"
It will not be just using Indians as slave labour. One use will be removing organs from live Indians for transplant to Americans and that will be just the start. I said in 1981, quoting the most influential American psychologist of his time, that when they don't need Indians and such as cheap labour, they will get rid of them because "sharing the Earth with other races and their survival is intolerable to the white race". It was this that prompted Indira Gandhi as prime minister to send an Indian expedition to Antarctica to stake India's claim to that part of the Earth. I showed in letters to her in 1982 why it was impossible for India to survive without nuclear supremacy over the United States and other white nations which led her to launch programs aimed at India's nuclear supremacy over the United States and other white nations which led to her assassination by K. Subrahmanyam through RAW under instructions from the C.I.A. "If you are not fast, you are food" means kill or be killed. This is so because of the nature of the American psyche I have described below (addendums of June 22, 2007 and later), likening it to that of a psychopathic serial killer, giving example of a little girl killed by such a killer.

An Op-Ed by a former C.I.A. employee, Grenier, in the New York Times of January 10, 2010 says "my colleagues and I could have come up similarly short on any number of occasions in Pakistan and Afghanistan during the run up to 9/11 and the resulting American-led invasion", admitting that the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 was staged by the C.I.A., as many Americans and others around the world have been saying, to provide a justification for the invasion of Afghanistan (and then of Pakistan, then of India; treating India north of the Vindhyas as part of a greater Middle East that I referred to is part of this plan), just as the recent attempted bombing of an airliner in Detroit was staged by the C.I.A. (I am the first to say this so far as I know) and is being used as a justification for a prospective invasion of Yemen and makes the point that C.I.A. personnel are no more psychopathic serial killers than members of the United States military and that "Members of Congress who had enthusiastically encouraged aggressive interrogations in the wake of 9/11 suddenly suffered amnesia when the political zeitgeist shifted". But I referred above to "the nature of the American psyche", not that of a segment of it. "So far as India is concerned, the United States equals the C.I.A.". He refers to politicians "posturing" out of "fear". The fear is that of India "rubbing the United States out of existence". Rubbing the United States out of existence requires nuclear supremacy for India over the United States which requires rubbing Manmohan Singh and his government -- who are the present day equivalents of the "fifty black sowars" who accompanied the lone Englishman who went to arrest India's emperor -- out of existence which can easily be done any day and any time without delay. Manmohan Singh and his government have been brought and kept in office by C.I.A.-RAW. RAW needs to be rubbed out of existence, starting with its headquarters, which can easily be done any day and any time without delay.

ADDED JANUARY 12 TO JANUARY 25, 2010: India, Phoenicians and Jews
I have said above that the Jews are originally from India. Gene D. Matlock in "About the Phoenicians and the Jews! ( http://www.viewzone.com/phoenician.html ) says:-
"The memory of the horror that fell upon the United States and the rest of the world on Sept. 11, 2001 will remain with us for many generations to come. The root of all this trouble stems from Man's forgetfulness and abysmal ignorance that two ancient brothers, who are ethnic twins, known by the family name of Kheeberi (Heber). ... These two brothers were called Phoenicians and Jews (Hebrews) ... The Hindus call them The Asvin Brothers and The Nasatya Twins. The Southwestern Indian tribes call them The War Twins. ... The Navajos call them collectively Ethkyn-Nah-Ishi, a name that cannot hide one of the names of the ancient Scythians (Skythians): Ashkenazi, the same Scythian group that gave the world Guatama Buddha. ... One of the largest tribes in South America, the Guaraní, Derive their collective name from Kuvarani: "Kubera's People." The sun, Kuarehy (Kuvarei,) is the home of the Guarani supreme god Tupa. Tupa may derive from Suva, a name of Shiva. ... The Guate in Guate-mala is the only way the Mayans could pronounce Kubare. Mala was one of the seven islands of the Antara-Dwipa of God Vishnu. Antara means "distant; another country; in the middle; on the way." The reader will readily recognize that Antara is similar to the name of the Carribean island chain of Antilla (Ant-EE-yah), where Columbus first anchored his three ships, the Pinta, Nina, and Santa María. Dwipa/Dvipa means "An island; Peninsula; A division of the terrestrial world." The Caribbean tribes would have pronounced Antara as Antila or Antala. Kuvere-Mala (Guatemala) is also a part of the Mayan lands known as Nacaste, derived from the Sanskrit Naga-Shetra (Land of the Nagas). ...The history of the fathers of all non-Africanoid humanity, a.k.a., Scythians, and all civilizations began only "God-knows-when" in the Khyber Mountain region of Afghanistan and Pakistan. In those days, the country we call India stretched from Alaska, down through Siberia, Russia, all of Central Asia, all of what we now call "India," as far as Antarctica. The Bible states that the world began in about 5,000 BC. That myth confuses and misdirects scholars, leading them into serious errors, for the Phoenicians themselves claimed to have been civilized since about 30,000 BC. ... In 1904, Jogendra Mohon Gupta, wrote an essay in which he thoroughly described his hypothesis that the Phoenicians were the fathers of all world civilizations:
The Phoenicians held their own civilization to be the most ancient and declared it to be thirty thousand years old. There is however no doubt that they were one of the first civilized nations of the world, if not the first, and that Phoenicia was not their first home. Instead of tracing them to their first settlements on the coasts of Arabia or Persia or in Afghanistan the historians of Europe have located them at once in Phoenicia, and hence the mistake that points to the origin of all civilization in Egypt. I would not discuss here the question whether Afghanistan was the first home of the Phoenicians or not. But I would affirm that the Panis or Panih of the Rig Veda were the same people as the ancient Phoenicians of Afghanistan. (To read his complete essay, see my book, From Khyber (Kheeber) Pass to Gran Quivira (Kheevira), NM and Baboquivari, AZ - When India Ruled the World!)" ... Edward Pococke also provides us with enough information to intuit accurately the relations that the Phoenicians and Jews had with India in ancient times:
... it is evident that the land which once sent forth to distant conquest, and to the foundation of such thriving settlements, these Tartarian tribes, must have vastly retrograded in the scale of civilization. What can be said of the present semi-barbarous land, which produced the Hiv-ites, for these were the people of Khiva! It is but too evident, that an immense retrogression in civilised life, and in the arts of war and peace, must have taken place in the Tartarian regions; for we have no right to assume that any of the great families of mankind were less civilized than the Egyptians, who formed a component part of the same emigration. The people of Khiva, however, seem to have been scattered over the surface of Cama, though they are found principally in the vicinity of Gaza. (p. 218.) ... Let us now take a view of the maritime portion of this remarkable country, where the most interesting monuments still remain, establishing the fact of that ancient Greek connection with India, so often alluded to by so many writers, so pertinaciously denied by some, so suspected by others. There to the north, dwelt the singularly ingenious and enterprising people of Phoenicia. Their first home was Afghanistan, that is, the land of the Ophi-enses or Serpent Tribe ... whose symbol was the Serpent ... this people were styled Bhainikoi (Phainikoi) or "The Hyas." (pp. 218-219.) ... Pococke also states:
Behold now the simple fact: The Cabeiri are the Khyberi, or people of the Khyber ... The Cabeiri are ... Cuvera, the Hindoo god of wealth and regent of the North, - that is, in simple language, the Kyber; it's region is wealthy and abounds with rubies; gold is found in the rivers in its vicinity, and it was likewise the ruling northern power in those days ... There is yet another important view in which the Khaiberi are to be considered. They are the Khebrew-i, or Hebrews.
... We have, then, in the Cabeiri, the representatives of a form of Bud-histic worship and Bud'histic chiefs, extending from the Logurh district (Locri) to Cashmir, the object of worship of the Hya (Yah), and the Phoenician race, for they are but one. They are the Khebrew-i, or Hebrews ... The tribe of Yudah (Judah) is in fact the very Yadu (Yadava) ... The people of God were literally taken out from amongst the other tribes, to be especially sanctified for the moral and religious generation of mankind.
Hence it is, that among the Greek writers of antiquity such a stress is always laid on the piety of the "Hyperboreans," that is the people of Khaiber, or the Hebrews ... I have no doubt whatever, that the northern limits of Afghanistan will be demonstrated to be the starting point of these two great families of language, and consequently of nations. The Afghans have claimed descent from the Jews, or Ioudaioi (Youdai-oi); the reverse is the case. The Haibrews or Khaibrews, are descended from the Yadoos. In that very land of the Yadoos, or Afghans - Dan and Gad, still remain of the feeble remnants of Jewish antiquity. (pp. 220-221, in passim.) ... Mystics, astrologers, and New Agers like to make much of these "Gemini Twins." However, nothing "magical" or "Outer-Spacey" turned them into deities. Having learned the movements of ocean currents, prevailing winds, and the like, they were able to touch the shores of every country on the globe. Every single tribe and nation on earth, even the most savage tribes living in the most impenetrable jungles, came to know about the "Gemini Twins" - or should I say, Cyber-Twins?
Their Sanskrit names, Pani (Trader) and Yuddhi (Warrior; Conqueror), clearly explain the part that each Hebraic clan had to play in this historic relationship.
In those remotest of times, places like Afghanistan weren't so barren and hostile to human life as they are now. The area was exceedingly fertile. As time went by, the Khyberis or Kheebers came to own all the arable land, creating vast feudal estates. Although their religion preached that mankind should be humanitarian, they became selfish and cruel to landless peasants and nomads. As their wealth in land and cattle grew, the nomads or Abels (not cattle), had less and less free space to graze their sheep and goats. Finally, the Khybers and the Abels began to make war on each other. Little by little, the Abels were absorbed into the feudal system as slaves. An enlightened king of the time, whom we now worship as Yahve or Jehovah, intervened in order to prevent a ghastly genocide. He ordered the settled Ganaana (Canaanites or Kheeberis) to quit monopolizing all the land and look for other ways to get rich, such as trading. Many of the Kheeberis, both traders and farmers, spread out, going down to what is now Rajasthan, Gujarat, Maharasthra, and other parts of Western India. On the Western coast of Northern India, they built shipyards and started making trading expeditions abroad. Their Sanskrit names, Pani (Trader) and Yuddhi (Warrior; Conqueror), clearly explain the part that each Hebraic clan had to play in this historic relationship. ...
The boats of the Phoenicians, accompanied by their warrior-trader partners, the Yuddhis, cautiously ventured beyond India. Competition in the copper market encouraged more and more Phoenicians to take to the seas. The Phoenician traders began to squabble among themselves, to see who got the best trade routes, seaports, and the like. A king of that time, possibly King Pancika (Phoenician), portrayed in the statue of him and his wife Hariti, shown in this article, ordered them to quit concentrating mainly on India and establish permanent colonies on distant shores. ... As the now widespread Cabeiris opened up new copper and gold mines in various parts of the world, demand for the mining and industrial output of the North Indian Khyber people began to decrease dramatically. Other problems also plagued Sivapuri (another name of the Khyber region, which comprised Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Kashmir). Khyberia was running out of copper. In desperation, mining engineers encroached upon the property of the farmers and cattle ranchers, seizing whatever properties still containing valuable mineral wealth. Severe climatic changes in about 5,000 BC made much land unfit for farming and grazing, both for settled farmers and nomadic shepherds. During this time, the biblical flood, actually confined to that part of Northern India, sent many hundreds of thousands of Indians fleeing to other countries. They became the fathers of Egypt, Greece, Rome, Sumeria, China, and other brilliant civilizations. ... Disastrous weather conditions appeared to fight on the side of the Brahm-Aryans or Devas, as the enemies of the Kheeberis were called in those days. Serious flooding inundated the lowlands; a devastating earthquake caused the Indus river to change its proper bed. The existing coastline and seaports sank under the sea which moved inland by more than fifty miles. These natural calamities, plus about 1,500 years of fighting, finally brought the Indus Valley civilization to its knees in approximately 1,900 BC. Most of the Panis and Yuddhis abandoned India forever. ... Abraham and Sarah, the ancestors of Hinduism, Judaism, Islam, and Christianity, left with them. These hordes of refugees were mainly Javan (Yavana), young people, who were high caste leaders (Khatti, Kshatriya, or "Hittites" as we know them), warriors (Yuddhi or "Jews"), Panis (Phoenicians), skilled craftsmen, clerks, and other high level commoners (Marutta or "Amorites"), Kaul-Devas (Chaldeans or the priestly caste) ­ all of whom were Cabeiris or Quiviras (Phoenicians and Jews) i.e. Yadavas. Joining the descendants of those who had left India after the Great Flood, they brought new blood and vigor to Sumeria, Greece, Egypt, Israel, Rome; to Mayapán, in Yucatan, the lands of the Incas and Moshicas in Peru, Chinese civilization, and to every other civilization on earth. ... The ancient Indian caste divisions didn't work in the old days, just as they don't work now. Not everyone wanted to work at hereditary occupations. Little by little, these castes turned into so-called "ethnicities," becoming for us Brits or British (Bharats), Scots (Scythians), Goths, Welsh, Visigoths, Hittites, Kassites, Kushites, Amorites, Celts (Kelts), Canaanites, Palestinians, Jutes (Juddhis), Samarians (Sham-Arya), Bavarians (Bhav-Arya), Scandanavians (Skanda-Nava), Hopi Indians (Hopis), Hispanics (Ishpanis) Nahuas of Mexico (Navajas, Sanskrit for "Sailor"), Ai-Guptos ("Egyptians," a word derived from a Sanskrit word Gupta, meaning a keeper of cattle) and variations of every other so-called "tribe" or "ethnicity" on earth. ... .
Rajeswar Gupta, in "A History showing how the Phoenicians had their earliest home in India" ( http://phoenicia.org/rigveda.html ), says:-
"A great war broke out in the remote old days between the Indian Aryans and the Phoenicians in which the latter were defeated and compelled to leave wholly or partially the land of the Aryans. ... Most of the Suktas of the Rig Veda either describe or refer to this and many other wars. ... The Rig Veda, therefore, is not a poem only but a history. The current meanings of most of the Suktas will accordingly have to be altered and the Rig Veda SANHITA itself explained in a way different from the accepted one. ... The Phoenicians were the first of the civilized nations of the world. The civilization of Assyria, Babylonia, Egypt, Greece and other ancient countries owed its origin to the union of the civilization of the Aryans with that of the Phoenicians. ... The Phoenicians originally lived in Afghanistan or in some part of India, whence driven out they migrated gradually westwards. While still residing in the neighbourhood of India they colonized and traded with Arabia and the countries bordering on the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. ...
The Phoenicians had colonies in many countries from each of which they were driven away by the natives after severe struggles. In this way they were expelled from India, Egypt, Greece, and Rome, or they mixed with the natives when they lost their supremacy in those countries. ... The primitive civilization of the world was born long before the time known to us. ... In ancient time the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea were connected together by a strait through which the Phoenician and Aryan trading ships entered the Mediterranean Sea and Indian goods were taken to Europe. As that passage gradually silted up the connection between India and Europe broke off. ... The stealing of cows by the Panis forms one of the most important factors of the Rik-Sanhita. The Suktas in which the Panis are mentioned, in which allusion is made to cows, or in which Indra is the god, are mostly related, directly or indirectly, to the stealing of cows. The commentator Sáyanáchárya admits this to be the case almost everywhere. Mr. Romesh Chunder Dutt, following the footsteps of Professor Max Muller, finds those of the Suktas or riks to contain the story of the stealing of cows in which the word Pani occurs, and considers the views of Sáyana as far fetched with regard to other Suktas and riks ... In the commentary Sáyana makes reference to the Panis in explaining Sukta 33 of the first mandala (Vide page 79 of Mr. Dutt's edition), which runs . "Desiring to get back the cows, stolen by the Asuras known as the Panis, &c." ... the homes of the Asuras of the Pani tribe were burned by the messengers of the Devas (gods) when they were discovered with the stolen cows ...
Prof. Max Muller would even trace the origin of the Trojan war in the epic of the immortal HOMER to the stories of the Panis and Sarainá in the Rig Veda ...The misconceptions of the Western scholars are more-over largely due to their acceptance of the current meanings ideas and of the Vedic words in explaining long-forgotten usages. It should be remembered that the modern meanings of words have reference to the modern state of the human society. An attempt to explain the Vedas, which are four or five thousand years old, in the light of present day signification of words is undoubtedly vain and useless. In two or three hundred years even many words and their meanings as well become obsolete and antiquated. What wonder, therefore, that a large number of words of an ancient work like the Vedas should be entirely forgotten after the lapse of so many centuries? The use of many words in their original Vedic sense has been forbidden even after the days of Sáyana. The dictionaries which are the repositories of words and their meanings were themselves compiled long after the Vedas when a great many of the words had lost their etymological signification; and the grammar has only puzzled the scholars in arriving at the correct import of the Vedic words, as it deals with but a few of the various meanings which particular words conveyed. Hence it is that the principal Vedic words have been made to mean what was not contemplated by the sages of old who used them first. The words Sarainá, Pani, Go, Indra, Soma, the twins Asvi, etc., are of this class and difficult to unravel. ... I wish Prof. Max Muller had taken the same pains to ascertain the meaning of the word Pani as he had done for Saramá ... The expression Revatá Paniná (4. 25. 7) shows that the Panis were rich ... The expression Paner maneeshán (3. 58. 2) shows that the Panis were wise ... Abasam Panim (6. 61. I) would show that the Panis were given to introspection ... The rik 7-6-3 tells us that the Panis did not perform any Yajnas or sacrifices; were garrulous, arrogant or haughty; had no respect for Yajanas and were Dasyus i.e., idlers or robbers. According to Sáyama they were usurers also ... In 1. 33. 3 the word Pani is used for traders. Mr. Dutt, evidently following the European scholars, adopts the meaning of the term as traders in this rik. It is therefore clear that the Panis were a trading people and sold things for their value ... The rik 6. 5 1 14 represents the Panis as gluttons. For their voracious eating they were regarded as monsters. The word is also explained to mean illiterate traders ... They were indeed a nation of traders without sacrifices, selfish, illiterate and usurious ... A nation of traders of those ancient days recalls the Phoenicians of old, for they were the only trading people then. In those days the Phoenicians were known as the Panis. The Aryans spoke of them as the Panih and the Romans as the Punic ... The question now is, how did the Panis come to be the neighbours of the Aryans? ... Prof. Keightly says that the Phoenicians called themselves Kedmus In the Semitic language Kedmum means the East. it is probable that the Phoenicians came from the East and so gloried in the name of Kedmus, i.e., an Eastern people. This again would show that civilization had travelled from the east and had not its origin in Egypt ...
Herodotus, known in the West as the father of History, was born in Asia Minor in 434 B.C. He travelled over many countries and recorded the experiences of his travels. He says: "The more learned of the Persians assert the Phoenicians to have been the original exciters of contention. This nation migrated from the borders of the Red Sea to the place of their present settlement, and soon distinguished themselves by their long and enterprising voyages. They exported to Argos, amongst other places, the produce of Egypt and Asia." Chapter I. Book 1 ... Prof. Larchar of Ireland says: "Some authors make the Phoenicians to have originated from the Persian Gulf." And in Pockock's 'India in Greece' we have (vide page 218), "There to the north dwelt the singularly ingenious and enterprising people of Phoenicia Their first home was Afghanistan ... I could multiply such quotations in support of my views. These lead me to conclude that from Afghanistan the Phoenicians went to the coast of the Persian Gulf, from the Persian Gulf to the borders of the Red Sea in Arabia and thence to Phoenicia, their last colony and home. I should like to observe here that they had, before their occupation of Phoenicia, colonized Egypt and the islands of the Mediterranean Sea. They had colonies in Greece and in the adjacent countries even. In fact with the Phoenicians or Panis the light of civilization travelled from the cast to the west ... The Phoenician held their own civilization to be the most ancient and declared it to be thirty thousand years old. There is however no doubt that they were one of the first civilized nations of the world, if not the first, and that Phoenicia was not their first home. Instead of tracing them to their first settlements on the coasts of Arabia or Persia or in Afghanistan the historians of Europe have located them at once in Phoenicia, and hence the mistake that points to the origin of all civilization in Egypt. I would not discuss here the question whether Afghanistan was the first home of the Phoenicians or not. But I would affirm that the Panis or Panih of the Rig Veda were the same people as the ancient Phoenicians of Afghanistan ... The word go occurs in almost all the riks in which the word Pani is used, and also in those Sutras in which Indra is the god or Ushá is the goddess. Prof. Max Muller has generally explained go as the rays of the Sun. I have not yet been able to know how other Western scholars explain the word. Mr. Dutt has followed Prof. Max Muller and has presented his view as shared by, a number of Vedic scholars. Sáyana interprets the word as water in certain passages, and as the re rays of the Sun in others, vide 4. 5 1. 3 and 4. 52. 2. There are, again, places where he gives no synonym for the word at all ... Sáyana flourished in the fourteenth century A.D., when the Sanscrit vocabulary had been almost perfected. The word go then had for its synonyms Heaven, ray, thunder, the moon, the sun, animal, the cow-sacrifice, cow, water, organ or sense, word, etc. And yet with all these before him Sáyana did not try to explain away the word go when he came across it in the incidents relating to the theft of the go by the Panis. A reference to the various passages will show that in such cases he has taken the word go to mean the cow or cows and not the rays of the sun ... It is said in 4.58.4 that the Panis kept concealed in the go three kinds of butter and the gods came to know of it. It is absurd to suppose that go which produced milk, curd and butter were rays of the sun and not cows. There cannot be the least doubt that go meant cows ...
I quote below the passage as rendered in English by Professor Max Muller ... The Panis: 'These are the cows, O Saramá which thou desirest, flying about the ends of the sky, O darling. Who would give them up to thee without fighting? For our weapons too are sharp' ... Saramá: 'Let only the Rishis come here fired with Soma, Ayasya (Indra) and the ninefold Angiras; they will divide this stable of cows; then the Panis will vomit out this speech ... The Panis: 'Art thou, 0 Saramá, come hither driven by the violence of the Gods? Let us make thee our sister, do not go away again; we will give thee part of the cows, 0 darling.' ... Saramá: 'I know nothing of brotherhood or sisterhood; Indra knows it and the awful Angiras. They seemed to me anxious for their cows when I came therefore get away from here, 0 Panis, far away.' ... 'Go far away, Panis, far away; let the cows come out straight the cows which Brihaspati found hid away, Soma, the stones, and the wise Rishis.' ... If Pani means the Phoenician merchant and go the cow ... Professors Max Muller, Monier Williams and others have taken the Vedic story of the theft of cows as an allegorical representation of the conflict between light and darkness or day and night Hence they have explained a good many riks as hymns in praise of Nature I am sure these scholars have not at every step followed the proper meaning of the Vedic words but have adopted what they themselves thought to be their plausible meaning ... It would seem that for some reason or other the study of the Rig Veda was for many centuries forbidden, and so the present confusion about the meaning of the Vedic words. The age of the Puranas evidently had its origin in an attempt to discover the original meaning of those words. In their ignorance of the proper signification of the epithets the commentators thought out gods and goddesses hoping to give a rational explanation of the sacred books. Thus they were led to ascribe to inanimate objects desires and functions which they could never exercise or possess, forgetting that the words in question in the Vedas related to men and their actions. And thus did the age of the Puranas or Mythology come into existence clothing the Vedas with absurdities. Still however in the hands of the Indian scholars like Sáyana and others the Vedas were not wholly divested of their historical garb. But the Western scholars, on the other hand, led by Professor Max Muller, have gone a step further -- they have declared the Vedas to be nothing more than hymns in praise of Nature. Hence the difference in the interpretations of the Rig Veda by the savants of the East and the West. Investing the Vedas with mythical ideas Sáyana has interpreted Saramá to be the Dog-messenger of the gods, while to Max Muller and his followers she is only the storm or the Dawn to suit their theory that the Vedas are but a collection of hymns. In the latter is lost the vestige of historic worth of the Vedas that is still traceable in the former. I am led to discard both these views . I accept the Vedas as a history recording the actions of men-that this -- view is correct will be amply demonstrated in this treatise. ... Sukta 108, quoted above,' if properly interpreted, will show that Saramá could have been nothing but a woman. In fact the expressions used therein cannot be correctly and rationally explained except in relation to man. For this and various other reasons I have interpreted Saramá as an imprisoned (or prisoner) Pani (Phoenicians) woman. ...
Another point worthy of notice in this connection is that all primitive words originally meant objects or things. Abstract or metaphorical meanings, as they implied intellectual development, came in long afterwards. The Rig Veda was composed in the primitive age of words and it was almost impossible for them to have been used metaphorically at that stage. The metaphorical and allegorical interpretation of the Vedas by the Western scholars cannot therefore be considered sound and reasonable. ... I may now say with Sáyana that the Panis stole the cows of the Angirás or of their friends. The Angirás defeated the Panis with the help of Indra and other powerful allies and regained their cows. I must however admit here that I am not yet certain whether the Panis stole the cows of the Angiras or the Angiras attempted to take by force the cows belonging to the Panis, for the Angiras and their partisans would not unoften seize the cows of others: vide Suktas 6-45-24 and 6-45-32. This shows that the Angiras would ask for cows from Kavitsa and Bribu. Some of the owners would part with their cows without any objection to continue their friendship with the Angiras, but some would object and a fearful strife would ensue. The Angiras would ask the Panis to give them their cows, but they would not do so willingly. So the Angiras sometimes took their cows by force -- vide 1-93-4. Many of the Aryan families were afraid of the Angiras and they would not oppose them. But the Panis were 'rich and powerful and possessed many hill forts and fortified towns: 6-45-9. So they were not afraid to defy Angiras. ... In riks 4-93-1 and 1-39-6 the cow is mentioned as in article of food. It is therefore evident that the Angiras were in the habit of taking beef and other meat. I have shown before elsewhere in my Bengali journal the Anjali, (Part 12, Vol. 1) that the Indian Aryans used to take animal food and intoxicating drinks, for which they fought amongst themselves I am not yet sure if the Panis were Aryans, but there is no doubt that they had a terrific quarrel with the flesh eating Angiras and their party for their cows and other cattle ... It is now necessary to determine who the Angiras were. They were the principal branch of the Aryans. Rik 2-24-6 describes them as learned. Brahmanspati or Brihaspati was their leader or headman. In rik, 5-101-1 Sáyana interprets Brahmané in relation to the caste or the family. of the Brahmans or the Angiras. This would show that the Brahmans of the later days were no other than the Argiras of the Vedic period. The word Brahmavih occurs in rik 9-33-1 . Sáyana explains it as Mantraíh that is by incantations or the sacred words. According to Pandit Ramanath Sarasvati the word means by the worshippers. Mr. Dutt however following Professor Wilson (and perhaps accepting the reading Nibrahmavih) makes it mean by those who were tenable to accept the mantras, but says in the note that the meaning of the passage is not clear. I think the meaning would be clear enough if the word were taken to denote the Angiras. It should be remembered that according to Sáyana the Brahmans are the descendants of the Angiras. ... The Angiras were flesh-eaters whilst the Panis were cowherds. That the flesh-eaters would often oppress the herdsmen can easily be understood. The Panis prepared three kinds of articles of food from the milk of their cows. Sáyana has described them as Ksheer or condensed milk, Dadhi or curd and Chrita or Clarified butter. I think the Persian Panir (cheese) is one of these three preparations. Most probably it is a modification of the first condensed milk. The article was first prepared by the Panis and so the name Panir The Panis not only made these preparations but also traded in them, and hence their love and care of cows and other cattle. Their rivals the Angiras, however, would kill the animals for the sake of their meat. Their interests were thus diametrically opposed and they fought for the cows. I hold the Angiras to have been the aggressors. ... I should mention here that to make the various preparations of milk the Panis required earthen pots and therefore knew the art of pottery and other kindred arts for making the requisite tools, etc. They also knew the art of cooking. The god "Chatuh Sringah" that is, having four horns, was nothing but a rod for churning milk and was used for preparing clarified butter. Another instrument was named the Dasa Yantra Utsa (6-44-24) It must have been a sort of lactometer. Different Vedic scholars have explained it differently though. There is however no doubt that the Panis knew how to cook and used to take cooked food. But the Angiras simply roasted their meat and other articles of food before taking them. This operation of roasting was known by such names as Kratu and Yajna, i.e., sacrifice. It may be that particular terms were applied as the occasions were ordinary or special. The Angiras hated the Panis and called them Akratu and Ayajna (that is men who did not perform the sacrifice), as the latter were not in the habit of roasting their articles of food. On the other hand it can easily be imagined that the Panis treated the Angiras with contempt for their sacrificial observances. Such epithets as vain, arrogant, etc., applied to the Panis would show that the feeling of hatred originated with them. The hatred of the Angiras was merely reciprocal The fact that the Panis were More advanced would only confirm my theory. ... In ancient times it was impossible for men to live in villages as at present. If they were afraid of the depredations of wild beasts, they were no less afraid of the outrages of human enemies which were yet more violent. For this the custom then was to live in Gosthis that is clans or communities. The Panis formed one such clan and they were further subdivided into houses or families. Each clan or house in those days lived in what is now called a Busti in the Upper Provinces of India. The bustis or localities were known as nagars or towns. The towns were protected by walls or trenches around them. I have already said that the Panis had many towns and forts and also an army. The clans of the Asuras, the Ilbis, the Ahis, the Bals, etc. were friends of the Panis and were opposed to the Angirás, the Agnis, the Bayûs, the Marûts, etc. The war they were engaged in might fittly be called the first Kurukshetra war, I believe all the rising families of ancient India took part in this great fight siding with one or the other party. and I have no doubt that branches of the Dása or the primitive families also had their share in it. ... I take Agni, Bayû, Marût and others to represent different families or clans like the Panis. This I could prove not only, from the Rig Veda but from various other ancient works also. It is easy to see that the terms as used in the Suktas of the Vedas refer to men. Their present interpretation to denote natural phenomena or the elements in the various passages in which they occur in the Vedas, is more modern: the words originally meant families of men, but underwent a change in the course of time to acquire their present meaning. Professors Max Alluller [ sic ], Kuhan and others have tried to fix their meaning tracing them to their root., It should be remembered that the Vedic words had already lost their original impart when their roots were formulated, and an attempt to explain them in the light subsequently obtained could not meet with unqualified success. ... The Panis and their party have been mentioned as Adevas (a=no or not, and devas = gods). It is therefore not strange if their animals, and their friends have been called Devas. The word Arya is of comparatively modern origin though it, like the word Dása occurs in several Suktas, and so I cannot agree with those who hold the Vedic war 'to have been a war between Aryans and non-Ayans. The word Arya came to be applied to all the clans including the Panis, the Asuras, the Bals the Angiras and others, at a later period. ... The frequent application in the Plirva (old) and nûtana (new) the Rig Veda of the words is worthy of notice, as also the mention of Indra as Yuvá -- a word used to qualify other gods also. According to Mr. Dutt, yuvá in several places young. But I think it means new to distinguish the Indra of later days from the Indra of old. The constant use of these three words -- purva, nútana and yuvá leads me to infer that the Rig Veda contains a description not of one but of two great wars one the Panik or Phoenician and the other the Asúrik or pertaining to the Asúras. The Phoenician war was the earlier of the two and it was in the days when the old rishis or sages flourished: the Asúrik war came after when new rishis appeared. The Indra who figured in the Panik war had riot the distinctive term yuvá which characterised the Indra of the Asurik war. There may be Suktas relating to other wars, but these two lasted long and were the most terrible in those old Verdic days. The Panis were not, however, the only trading people hose old Vedic days. Many other nations and races either singly or jointly all or most traded with the Panis in various parts of the then known world while some families espoused the cause of the Angiras. Perhaps vide 31, 32 and 33 of Sukta 45, mandala 6, relate regarding the Bribus. These Bribus, I think, were no other than the modern Brahui or Brahoe of Beluchistan for which reference may be made to Chamber's Encyclopaedia Vol II, or Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. III. They were skilled carpenters. The Tvastas were a branch of these Bribus, Professor Max Aluller has given an account of the Bribus in Vol. 11 of his "Chips from a German Workshop" According to him they were a family of carpenters from whom the Rhiblús also learnt the art. I think the Rhiblús who were allies of the Angiras learnt the art of carpentry from the Bribus who sided with the Panis. The fact is that all of them were men and not gods. vide Suktas 20 and 40 of the first mandala. ... The word Pûshá is mentioned in Sukta 42 of the first Mandala and also in several other Suktas. The Angiras were not acquainted with the whereabouts of the Panis and so sought the help of the Pushas in finding them out. The Pushas were thus the guide of the Angiras. If we eliminate the more modern and the special Suktas we shall find that the Rig Veda is a history of the Panik and the Asurik wars. The gods mentioned in them were friends of one or other of the parties engaged in the wars. They were all different branches of the ancient human race and not gods of the elements, nor deified powers of Nature. ... I have already said that the Angiras were hated by the Panis for their sacrificial rites. In fact the hatred was carried so far that the Panis appeared wherever the Angiras performed their sacrifices and caused great disturbances. The Angiras retaliated by seizing and destroying the commodities of butter and cheese of the Panis. The practice of offering up ghee or clarified butter to the sacred fire may be traced to the attempt of the Angiras to burn the ghee they obtained by Plunder from the Panis. In this act the Angiras had had the support of their friends Mitra and Varuna: vide 1-2-7 in which they invoked the latter to their help. Mercilessness in the treatment Of the fallen enemy characterised the spirit of vengeance in those "remote old days. I cannot say that the humanitarian civilisation the present day is without any trace of it. The captives were then kept in dark dungeons strongly bound in chains or cords, in the custody of the Varunas who acted as gaolers and were known as Pasees or Binders. It was the duty of the latter to secure the enemies in the field of battle When conquered and put them in chains. Sometimes they would go out as pirates and surprise their enemies whom they would bring away in chains or cords. In the Suktas 24 and 25 of the first mandala the rihsi is mentioned as Súnah Sep would Sep which would appear to have been used as a general term for the Phoenician prisoners These Suktas describe how they were secured by means of pás, that is, chain or cord. The following passages will help to make me clear: -- "Of the gods of various orders whose graceful name shall I utter? Who will again set me free in this wide world: that I may see my parent "May he (Varuna) chastise the enemy who has pierced my heart." 1-24-28. I pray to you for long life." May the king set us at liberty." 1 24-12. ... Unfasten from above, O Varuna, the upper cords that bind us down and the lower ones from below. Loosen also the ties in the middle. We shall then, 0 thou son of Aditi, live sinless without breaking thy vows." 1.24-25. ... The above extracts show that those who were thus lamenting and asking for mercy did not know the gods well They only besought him for clemency who they thought could release them. It is therefore clear that lamantations who arose parties of the Adevas (no-gods) were subjected to the cruellest torture when imprisoned by their enemies. ... The enemies and their houses were burnt down in retaliation: They (the Angiras) made fire with their own hands and hurled it on to the hills (the hill forts of the Panis), for the destroying fire was not there before." 2-24-7. ... "Thou hast burnt to ashes the robber captured from the land of the Deva." I-33-7. ... Jealousy and envy brought about a difference in the customs and usages of the opposing parties. I would trace the different modes of writing from right to left and from left to right to the mutual enmity of the Devas and the Adevas -the latter writing from right to left and the former from left to right. The Panis as traders had learnt early the art of writing for which the Devas disliked them. Even the Vedas remained unwritten for many centuries and continued as Srutis being committed to memory and thus handed down from generation to generation. From an aversion to writing anything written was scorned or ridiculed as after the fashion of the Panis or Panisads. Panisad would appear to be the Greek name for Pani. Hence the name " U-Panisad " or " Upanisad" derived from a dislike to writing. In very many riks the term "U" or "Uh" has an interjectional use and is expressive of an emotion of pain or scorn. I think the word Upanisad (Upanishad), is born of scorn for the Panis. It is remarkable that the derivation of this word Upanishad is not yet satisfactorily traced A reference to the authorities extant will bear me out. ... The Date of the Panik War
On the date of the civilisation of the world must count from that date. It would at present appear, that history has not recorded any event earlier than this war, and as our early civilisation is mainly related to the Panis and their times the date of this war must be a very important factor in our researches. ... I hold with the Panis that they are the first of the a civilised nations of the earth. If they were the first to see the light of civilisation, they did also, under the guidance of Providence; spread that light among various peoples in the ancient world; in fact they carried it from one country into another either to be expelled in the end or to merge themselves in the nationality of the people with whom they came in, contact. The Panis had colonies in Afghanistan, Persia, Arabia, Turkey, Egypt and Greece, and their supremacy gained ground in one when it declined in another. It will be enough for me to say for the present that facts are on record which conclusively prove that the Panis at least visited all these countries for purposes of trade and they introduced India to other ancient countries of the world in those days. ... Many are the adherents of the theory propounded by the Western scholars that from Central Asia the Aryans migrated to India and the other countries. It is not easy to determine exactly who these Aryans were. I am inclined to think that originally there was no nation bearing that name. The word as used in some of the riks of the Rig Veda does not appear to refer to any particular nation. The word "Aryan" came to be used after the Phoenician War. It is probable that the Angiras and their allies were given that name for their agricultural pursuits. This would nullify the theory of their migration from Central Asia. After the Great War the survivors of the rival parties who were left together formed into a new nation under the name of the Aryans. The word Asura has been repeatedly used in the Rig Veda, and I have already shown elsewhere that Assyria was named after them to denote the country they lived in. After the war a branch of the great Asura clan passed over into Asia Minor and founded Assyria, In India they as well as their country had been known by the name of Asura This leads me to conclude that it was from India and not from Central Asia that the Aryans -migrated into different lands using the trading ships of the Panis in their travels- a conclusion which dispenses with the theory of their migration overland also. ... The Phoenician ships sailed from the coasts of India and entered direct the Mediterranean Sea through the Strait of Suez, for in those remote days Suez was a strait and not an isthmus as it afterwards became through the silting up of the channel. The subsequent closure of the passage not only broke off the communication between the East and the West but also separated the Panis inhabiting the two quarters. Hence it was that long afterwards India appeared as a dream land to the ancient Greeks and other nations. The Panik War had taken place long before the strait of Suez was closed. That Suez was originally a strait will be evidenced by the facts here adduced. The present isthmus is sandy, which shows that there was a time when it formed part of the sea. Geology will bear testimony to this. The following extracts also support my view: "From hence inland to Heliopolis the country of Egypt is a spacious plain, which, though without water, and on a declivity, is a rich and sandy soil." ...
All this would show that there was a time when Suez was under water through which the Phoenician vessels sailed to the Mediterranean, and Heliopolis was an important port of the Panis. It was when Suez was a branch of the sea with Heliopolis on it, or before that age even, that the great Phoenician war broke out. The union between the east and the west broke off as Suez turned into an isthmus. ... The Strait of Suez had nearly silted up when Moses crossed the Red Sea and the Israelites safely passed over the shallow water. According to many Moses flourished two thousand years before Christ, and it must have taken two thousand years more for Suez to have filled up. The fact that Heliopolis had then fallen into decay before the growing fame of Memphis, would support this theory. It is said that Menes, the first king of Memphis, founded the city more than four thousand years before Christ, and according to the Greeks the gods of the name of Helios reigned in Egypt long before that date extending over a period of about fourteen thousand years. There can be no doubt that these rulers of Heliopolis, the so called gods Helios, were none other than the Pani of old Heliopolis therefore must have fallen into ruins at least four thousand, if not six thousand years before Christ. It should be noted here that Heliopolis was the cradle of the Egyptian civilisation of which, the Panis were undoubtedly the originators. ... According to the Western scholars the Rig Veda was composed in 2000 B.C. As I have already shown the Phoenician war to have taken place in 4000 BC the Rig Veda may safely be assumed to have been 'composed about that time. It should be remembered that the great Book took many years to compile and it is not improbable that a number of the Suktas were composed in 4000 B.C. I would even say that the Pauranic or Poetic Age began two thousand years before Christ. It is not therefore unlikely that the historical part of the Rig Veda was anterior to the Pauranic age by another two thousand years. Mr. Tilak, the well known Mahratta scholar, has, in explaining the astronomical import of a particular Sukta, demonstrated that the Rig Veda was composed six or seven thousand years before Christ. The Phoenician war, as recorded in the Rig Veda, may therefore be referred to a date at least six or seven thousand years before the Christian era, if not earlier. ...
With a few words more I shall conclude the subject. In every nation or race, old or new, civilised or uncivilised, war-songs have been handed down from generation to generation. The small stock of songs that the wild hill tribes possess is only a collection of war-songs Colonel Todd's history of Rajasthan is based on such songs. In fact the songs of Bháts or eulogists, so well known in this country were current even in the Vedic age, and I have no hesitation in affirming that in war-songs and songs of victory the Rig Veda had its origin, at least they form the bulk of the great work. The old war songs of ancient India composed the true Rig Veda and many other songs on various subjects came to be added to them I subsequently The Rig Veda is thus not a collection of hymn and anthems but of war songs recording the primitive history of the world. It may therefore be concluded that the first history of each nation or race of man began with war songs.
I have in the previous section already mentioned the city of Heliopolis of Egypt. In Greek "Heliopolis" means "the city of the sun. In India also there was an ancient city of that name which would appear to have belonged to some family of the Panis. A city or town in those days would be named after the family or clan that inhabited it, and so the clan of the Heliopolis named their towns after their own wherever they went. This I conclude from the name Ilibis which occurs in the Rig Veda, the word being only another form of Heliopolis. All the towns of the name of Heliopolis -in India, in Egypt, or elsewhere were founded by the llibis.
Modern Morea in Greece had for its ancient name Peloponnesus which I think originally meant palli or residence of the Panis. That Greece was not unknown to the people of ancient India has been very ably shown by Prof. Pococke in his work "India in Greece." In fact the fame of India was carried throughout the ancient world by such races as the Ilibis, the Panis, the Bals, the Asuras and others.
If may be safely affirmed that Balkh, Baalbek and other ancient cities bearing similar names were founded by the Bals. We know from the Rig Veda itself that the north west of ancient India was inhabited by these races who used to fight amongst themselves. The Rig Veda is therefore not only a history of ancient India but of the antire ancient world, and so the whole human race is interested in its correct and proper exposition. And as more light is thrown on the subject new truths will be discovered in the various branches of human knowledge. For this purpose it is necessary that the great work should be translated in the different languages of the world.
When in the old days the isthmus of Suez was a strait connecting the Red Sea with the Mediterranean not only was there an exchange of merchandise between the countries on either side but also of thoughts and experiences. With the closing up of the passage such exchange ceased and the nations and races grew up independently each in its own way, the western nations making rapid progress in material prosperity and the eastern in spiritual. Many centuries after Suez has again been opened up to renew the lost connection between the east and the west to fulfil the purposes of a beneficent Providence.
As Bháts or eulogists in the present days sing in praise of heroes and dynasties, so in the old days the Rig Veda was sung by the Rishis or sages and the assembled people heard with rapture the glories of their forefathers. In explanation of the discontinuance of the Vedic songs and psalms in India I can only say what I myself think on the subject. In many places of the Rig Veda mention is made of bovine food which the antagonists of the Panis were in the habit of taking. I am not sure if the word at first meant cattle generally, but it is certain that subsequently it represented the cows only. And it is easy to conceive how the study of the Rig Veda came to be interdicted as containing obnoxious passages when cow-killing was considered a great sin at least in the Pauranic age. In fact the Rig Veda fell into disuse with the introduction of the worship of the cow, nay the unfortunate householder who dared to possess the work was cursed to death from thunder and lightning. The result was that at last not only the doomed Rig Veda, but the entire Vedas fell into oblivion leaving behind only an unshaken veneration for them in the minds of people of the country.
Professor Sergi holds that the ancient civilisation of Europe is derived from the coasts of Mediterranean and he doesn't accept the theory that the Aryan civilization was the first and most ancient in the scale. I believe I have been able to show in this examination of the Rig Vida -- which is a repository of facts not action -- that it was not from Central Asia, as is ordinary supposed, but from India -- the land of Ilibis, the Panis, the Asuras, the Angiras and others -- that the light of civilisation spread far and wide to wake up the whole world to progress and enlightenment.
Appendix
The Phoenicians derived their name from Phoenicia, meaning the inhabitants of Phoenicia. The diphthong oe in the word shows that with the sound of o (as in order) it should read as Phonicia and with the sound of e as Phënicia. It is thus clear that by some the word was pronounced as Phënicia, and Phonicia had its origin in Phonis. The pronunciation of P and Ph are so closely allied that it is not unoften that the one takes the place of the other Ph is P hard. The conclusion therefore is that Panis is only a different form of Phonis and the Panis of old were known as the Phoenicians in later days. In fact the word Phoenician has sprung from the word Panis which was the original name of the race. The country inhabited by the Panis came to be known as Pânisé Pânisia -- transformed into Phönicia or Phoenicia, and as time went on the inhabitants of Phoenicia were called Phoenicians instead of Panis.
Two eminent scholars of the day have already expressed their opinion off the subject of this treatise regarding the historical aspect of the vedas. I append them below as they may encourage others like me in this interesting study.
1. Translation of a letter in Bengali addressed to the author by Mr. R. C. Dutt, member of the Indian Civil Service:
I have read your assay on the Panic War. I am glad to see the scholarship and research you have brought to bear on the subject.
I see nothing improbably in the theory that there was a race called Pani or Panis, that the Indian Aryan seized their cows and that many of the suktas of the Rig Veda were composed to record historical events. In fact your exposition seems more plausible than that of Prof. Max Muller. But I am unable to decide which of these two expositions is correct: indeed I cannot say if it is possible to come to a decision on the subject after so many thousand years.
To what nation or race did the Panis belong, if they were really men? You say they were Phoenicians. A good many proofs are wanted before the statement can be accepted. That the Phoenicians always came to ancient India by the land route: that they quarreled and fought with the Indian Aryans, and that the latter knew them as Panis: or, that the Phoenicians have in their own works mentioned the Aryans living on the banks of the Indus -- these are conclusions which require to be amply demonstrated. I do not say that your theory is a groundless one, but still it is only a theory for the present. Hundreds of hill tribes inhabited Afghanistan, and it s not improbable that they quarrelled with the Indian Aryans for cattle (cows), and that some of them were referred to as the Panis in the Suktas of the Vedas.
I cannot accept your meaning of the word Saramá as correct. It may be taken to mean the Dawn even if the word Pani signifies some hill tribe or a trading people -- "at dawn of day the Aryans discovered the concealed cows and recovered them with the help of Indra."
There can however be no doubt that the word go means cows if your interpretation of the word Pani be correct.
Sd. Romesh Chunder DuttMay 1, 1902
[The Phoenicians dwelt in some part of Afghanistan long before they colonised Phoenicia, and the wars described in the Vedas refer to those days. Defeated in those wars or for some other reasons they migrated westward and founded the colony of Phoenicia. Or it may be that Phoenicia was their principal colony in those remote Vedic days, and after their defeat in the wars referred to in the sacred books they removed there for good. Mr. Dutt's suggestion, therefore, that the Phoenicians came to India by land, is not borne out by my conclusions -- Author.]
2. The following appeared in the columns of the Indian Mirror (Calcutta), of the 22nd May 1902, from the pen of the eminent Sanscrit scholar Prof. Satis Chandra Acharya Vidyabhusan M. A. of the Presidency College (Calcutta):
" It was nearly ten years ago that I marked with surprise several passages in the Rig Veda (as for instance, in Mandala VI, Sukta 53) where the word Pani repeatedly occurred. Looking into the commentary of Sayanacharya, I found the word Pani interpreted as Vaninj, a merchant. In the Chapter on Unádi suffixes in Panini's Sanskrit Grammar, the word Vanij was found to be derived from the root Pan. I then suspected that the word Pani, meaning a merchant and occurring in the Rig Veda, might refer to the Phoenician race. Eventually I gave expression to the fact in several places, and lately in the introduction to my edition of Kachchayana's Pali Grammar. I expressed my view on the subject With great diffidence. Now I am very glad to find my view confirmed by our learned friend; Babu Rajeswar Gupta, Head Master of the Rangpore Normal School, and Editor of Anjali, who has published a long and interesting article on the subject in the Chaitra number of his journal. The article is an admirable one and is a product of deep researches into the Vedic literature. It reflects great credit on the scholarship of the writer and has brought to light some very important facts of earliest history."
Published by Jogendra Mohan Guupta, 1904.Printed by Sanyal and Co. at the Bharat Miihir Press25, Roy Bagan StreetCalcuttaIndia"

I have said above that Buddhism and Jainism have been responsible for the propaganda of pacifism which has destroyed India and "one of the names of the ancient Scythians (Skythians): Ashkenazi, the same Scythian group that gave the world Guatama Buddha. ..." Ashkenazis are jews. Buddha was an enemy agent; that is why the Taliban destroyed the 600 feet tall statues of Buddha, as I have said above.

After my reference to fear of India "rubbing the United States out of existence", the criminal Negro slave of the Americans is putting another $33 billion in the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, the most sacred part of India. C.I.A.-RAW still control the Indian government and media and the propaganda and policies to destroy India in every possible way continue.

The C.I.A.-staged attacks on September 11, 2001 to justify the invasion of Afghanistan and eventually of India is part of a long chain of such acts; murdering Americans in the United States to justify invasions of other countries is a practice of U.S. intelligence agencies going back at least to the time of John F. Kennedy. James Bamford has published three books on the United States' National Security Agency -- a sister agency of the C.I.A. The second of these, 'Body of Secrets', published in 2001, according to Robert D. Steele, "a professional intelligence officer", writing on May 12, 2001(see http://www.amazon.com/Body-Secrets-Ultra-Secret-National-Security/dp/0385499086/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1263463220&sr=8-3 ) discloses that "The Joint Chiefs of Staff was "out of control" during our confrontations with Cuba, and proposed to the President of the United States that U.S. military capabilities be used to murder Americans in order to provide a false cover for declaring war on Cuba." Kennedy was murdered by the C.I.A. for balking at these plans. A documentary in the program, 'The Spy Factory', on the United States Public Television station, WGBH of Boston, describes how those who executed the successful attack on the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 were under the National Security Agency's complete surveillance and control in the days, weeks and months before the successful September 11, 2001 attacks and it deliberately, repeatedly, systematically and flagrantly denied the U.S. Federal Bureau of Intelligence (F.B.I.) requests, made before the attacks, for information -- transcripts of specific telephone conversations of the specific individuals who carried out the successful attack that it had and admitted even at the time it had -- that would have thwarted the attacks. It denied the requests because the attacks were sponsored by and carried out under the control of the C.I.A., the National Security Agency and the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. These three entities were represented in the person of Michael Hayden, a U.S. Air Force general, who was head of the National Security Agency at the time of the attacks, was head of the C.I.A. for six years after that and who planned and carried out the attacks. See the attachments to this E-Mail for what he, along with K. Subrahmanyam, said to me.

In his 'A Pretext for War: 9/11/ Iraq and the Abuse of America's Intelligence Agencies', (I became aware of the existence of this book only on January 14, 2010; before that I was only aware of the first of his books on the National Security Agency, "The Puzzle Palace", which I had seen some time after it was published more than 25 years ago) Bamford "writes about the largest terrorist training camp in the world, located on 1,200 acres in North Carolina, USA, ran by the US military. Bamford writes that the training here involves blowing up busses using fertilizer and fuel oil (yes, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed was educated in North Carolina). Coupled with the revelations of Part III of the book, where Bamford talks about the Office of Special Plans set up by the neocons to deceive the masses, any critical thinker can figure out what really took place on 9/11" ( http://www.amazon.com/Pretext-War-Americas-Intelligence-Agencies/product-reviews/140003034X/ref=cm_cr_dp_synop?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=0&sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending#R3R3Z7PIVHYF8L ). About the third of Bamford's books on the National Security Agency, 'The Shadow Factory', The Washington Post's review of the book says: "Before Sept. 11, 2001, the National Security Agency bent over backwards to assure Americans that it respected their privacy. The supersecret intelligence agency's then-director, Gen. Michael Hayden, told Congress in April 2000 that if, at that very moment, Osama bin Laden himself were walking across the Peace Bridge from Niagara Falls, Canada, as soon as he reached the New York side "my agency must respect his rights against unreasonable search and seizure." ... In The Shadow Factory, James Bamford's important and disturbing new book about the NSA, we learn that as the general spoke, two of bin Laden's men already had arrived on American soil and were taking flying lessons. We also learn that, contrary to the implication of Hayden's testimony, the NSA was intercepting their communications. A few months earlier the huge agency, based at Fort Meade, Md., 27 miles outside of Washington, had begun surveillance of a bin Laden operations center in Sana'a, Yemen. This was not just another intercept: Bin Laden had declared war on the United States, his organization had bombed our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and the NSA had good reason to suspect that he was plotting more attacks. As the 9/11 Commission later established, U.S. intelligence officials knew that al-Qaeda had held a planning meeting in Malaysia, found out the names of two recruits who had been present -- Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi -- and suspected that one and maybe both of them had flown to Los Angeles. Bamford reveals that the NSA had been eavesdropping for months on their calls to Yemen, yet the agency "never made the effort" to trace where the calls originated. ... "At any time, had the FBI been notified, they could have found Hazmi in a matter of seconds. All it would have taken was to call nationwide directory assistance -- they would have then discovered both his phone number and address, which were listed in the San Diego phone directory," Bamford writes. "Similarly, if the NSA had traced any of the incoming calls to the [Yemen] ops center, they would have located two of the callers on California soil." ... " ( http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0307279391/ref=ord_cart_shr?_encoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance ).

Whatever the criminal Negro slave of the Americans says about the obscene and criminal behavior of bankers applies even more forcefully to himself as he maintains an obscene silence about the C.I.A.'s and NSA's crimes against Americans and against nations around the world, obscenely benefiting from the booty brought in by the C.I.A. from its crimes against me, for example, killing thousands of Americans and thousands and millions around the world in invasions and wars justified by fake excuses provided by the C.I.A. with its terrorist acts against Americans for this purpose and participating in its infinitely more numerous and extensive terrorist acts around the world. Others in his government, members of the U.S. Congress, etc., similarly profit from, participate in and maintain a silence about the C.I.A.'s and NSA's crimes against Americans and against the world with behavior far more obscene and criminal than the bankers'.

Unlike the C.I.A.'s crimes against Americans, RAW's crimes against India are manifestations of India's occupation by the Tamil enemy, in the person of K. Subrahmanyam (see the attachments to this E-Mail).

I have recommended above euthanizing the entire population of India as hopelessly polluted in its genetic make up and referred to bringing down the world's population from six billion plus to no more than 500 million. What the man in Chicago (above) said about sending shiploads of food to the starving Indians -- "They will have to start killing some of them" -- represents the true feelings of Americans toward Haiti. After this week's earthquake I thought this was Nature cooperating in the reduction of the world's population and thought perhaps the Americans will send some bombers to finish Nature's work. The question is: why can't the Haitians take care of themselves? Can any one imagine any colonial power hindering the development of Israel, with a population of seven million, on which Indians, with a population over a billion, depend for their defence? Why haven't the Haitians developed a nuclear arsenal to compel Americans to work as their slaves to provide them with consumer goods as the United States has made the population of China and India into slave labor for the American consumer? Just witness the behavior of Indians toward me -- India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian -- described above and below and toward the piece of dog-faeces they have made their empress to see whether Indians deserve to survive. If they had any spark of life, they would have thrown her out of an airplane long ago -- any life they have is the life characteristic of a malignant virus that needs to be destroyed as soon as possible, as I have said above -- and made me their sovereign as I rightfully should be. The same can be said for Americans who have made a criminal Negro slave their president while committing the worst crimes in human history toward me. I have referred above to "sharing the Earth with other races and their survival" being "intolerable to the white race". Keeping them alive to use them as slave labor promotes its own genetic pollution and threatens its own survival.

Yesterday, January 18, was a national holiday in the United States for Matin Luther King's birthday. Congressman John Conyers, co-founder of the Congressional Black Caucus, had unsuccessfully introduced legislation every year for fifteen years to make it a holiday. In 1982-83, when Conyers came to Harvard University, I gave him a letter including a copy of my friend-of-the-court Brief in the trial of Reagan's would-be assassin documenting the racially motivated crimes at Harvard against me and how the black Federal judge presiding over the trial committed obstruction of justice to suppress my Brief documenting the presence of organized criminal activity in the mental health field, the testimony of whose members resulted in the acquittal of Reagan's would-be assassin on grounds of insanity. Upon this, Reagan in November 1983 signed the bill making King's birthday a national holiday after impassioned speeches by members of the U.S. Senate, orchestrated for this purpose, in support of the holiday passing the bill. Conyers was also made chairman of "the most powerful committee of the U.S. Congress", as he characterized it two years ago, the House Judiciary Committee. The Times of India correspondent in Washington, J. N. Parimoo, was given an extraordinary "exclusive interview" by Reagan before he returned to India for refusing to report on the crimes against me in the U.S. An undergraduate student of Indian origin who was head of the Indian organization at M.I.T. -- this was when I was no longer living in that M.I.T. library -- had on his own arranged for me to speak on the crimes against me in a large classroom at M.I.T. -- only one hostile Indian graduate student ('the ENTIRE C.I.A. is after you!', though I did not say it was the entire C.I.A.), one Sri Lankan and two Americans showed up and the virulent hostility of the Indian made the rest of them also hostile -- and Clinton as president later put the Indian who arranged for the meeting on a panel which met with him because my advising Indira Gandhi as prime minister was responsible for his organizing it. He was recently brought to India by C.I.A.-RAW and was in the news for his spat with the head of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) to make him "controversial" because he had characterized me as "controversial" -- a term applied to famous and newsworthy people. A column in the New York Times a couple of days ago had a heading something like 'If NBC [National Broadcasting Corporation] keeps sinking, why does its president [Jeff Zucker] keep rising?' The answer is when Zucker was president of the Harvard campus newspaper, 'The Harvard Crimson', I had given him material about the crimes against me at Harvard which he suppressed. When I sent material regarding the crimes against me to American conservative William F. Buckley, editor of 'National Review', he began to promote Dinesh D'Souza, an undergraduate from India on a Rotary scholarship at Dartmouth College, making him a domestic policy adviser in the White House right out of college, gave him a white American wife, etc. When I wrote about the crimes against me at Harvard to a Harvard Political Science professor who had been Carter's National Security Adviser, he began to bring large numbers of Indian graduate students to his department including Fareed Zakaria whom the New York Times vowed to make the United States' National Security Adviser, giving him a white American wife, etc. There are hundreds of such examples. The Martin Luther King birthday holiday, the white American wives given to D'Souza and Zakaria -- all promote the genetic pollution of the white race and are examples of how the Americans are committing national suicide in service of their crimes against me.

What are present day Indians like with whose genes the Americans are polluting their own gene pool? The following are five headlines out of 27 headlines on page 1 of the 'India News' section of an international news accumulating service (emphasis has been added to the key words which illustrate the relationship of the Indian nigger slaves to the white master whose approval, "praise", attention or telling Indians they are "important" sends them into ecstasy; consider whether you have ever seen such headlines in the U.S. press about visiting Indian officials of whatever rank):-
1. "Breaking News: Gates PRAISES India's Restraint post 26/11";
2. "India IMPORTANT for peace in region: Holbrooke";
3. "Holbrooke all PRAISE for India";
4. "U.S. HAILS India's reaction post 26/11";
5. "US defence chief PRAISES India's restraint after Mumbai attacks".
No matter what the issue, year or decade, such headlines celebrating PRAISE from the white master are typical of the Indian press. Then consider what this tells you about the character and genetic make up of the Indian nigger slaves. Such verbal evidence is not the real evidence. Business letters in the British style taught in Indian schools a few decades ago used to close with "I beg to remain your most obedient servant", etc. The evidence is their failure to defend themselves against external aggressors and continued failure to do so -- not against other Indians which is what Pakistanis are but against the white master.

I was watching on C-SPAN a hearing by the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, January 20, 2010, on security measures against terrorism. Boy, are these a bunch of stupid nigger slaves of their country's enemies! First let me say within the last two days I learnt one of the vice-presidential candidates in the last U.S. election was unable to keep herself from referring to her opponent as Obiden instead of Biden, that for this reason she was instructed to address her opponent in a debate by his first name, Joe, instead but that despite that she could not help referring to him as Obiden once in the debate, that this problem was considered a "verbal tic". Someone with such a defect is unfit for ANY public office -- even a beauty queen or Miss Alaska as she reportedly once was -- much less for vice-president. The stupid nigger slaves of U.S. enemies on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee and rest of the U.S. Senate are simply unfit to hold any public office. This hearing was mainly about no-fly lists, etc., to prevent entry of terrorists into the United States and witnesses included the F.B.I. Director. Just two glaring examples of the unfitness of these nigger slaves of U.S. enemies to hold public office. One, I have shown in my work titled "Terrorism" published in thecurrentonline.com ( http://www.thecurrentonline.com/2.14134/web-submission-terrorism-1.1969806 ) that Israel and its friends in the U.S. have planted nuclear bombs in the largest U.S, cities. Two, I have shown above that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were sponsored by the C.I.A. as are almost all terrorist incidents against the U.S. and around the world and said that the recent terrorist incident on a plane in Detroit -- which was the focus of this hearing -- was no exception. After what I said about the Martin Luther King birthday holiday above, a U.S. senator from South Carolina blocked a black from being head of the Transportation Security Administration. Jews are about two percent of the U.S. population and I got tired of counting the number of jews on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, not to mention the witnesses. What are the chances that this U.S. senator from South Carolina will go beyond such feeble, token steps and sponsor a Constitutional Amendment to re-introduce the restrictions medieval Europe had on what jews could and could not do in society or even legislation to eliminate the brainwashing Americans undergo from the earliest age -- several years ago in letters to the press I showed how Bush Jr. as president-elect showed the effect of such brainwashing -- from holocaust studies, etc., in schools? Perish the thought! I have shown in the above work in thecurrentonline.com that I am the true leader of the Americans and everyone else is a usurper. What are the chances that the Americans will come to their senses and realize their survival depends on it?
As of today, the Haiti earthquake has dropped off American TV and replaced by the infidelity of an obscure politician and "sex addiction" of a golfer though there is no such thing as sex addiction; then you will have to call John F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton sex addicts as well. The U.S. push for healthcare reform -- their number one issue -- is due to exploding costs of healthcare but there are treatments incomparably more effective, incomparably cheaper and accessible and incomparably better in side effects -- as I said in my Plaintiff/Appellant's Brief that was suppressed by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Chief Justice appointed by the Harvard crime syndicate (above) -- but there is no mention of this by anyone thanks to this crime syndicate and America's enemies -- the C.I.A. and the jews. The dim wits and imbeciles of the U.S. Congress are utterly incapable of dealing with any of this. Killing just one of America's enemies -- the C.I.A. -- will solve all of America's problems just as killing RAW -- the C.I.A.'s branch in India -- will solve all of India's problems; in fact, just killing K. Subrahmanyam, the Tamil enemy (see the attachments to this E-Mail) will solve all of India's problems. Alternatively, just throwing the Italian waitress C.I.A.-RAW has made India's empress out of a plane will solve all of India's and America's problems.

India is among the worst in disaster relief but even in India airdrop of food and other supplies -- by fixed wing aircraft not helicopters -- is the first thing done for victims of disaster who are usually totally cut off from the rest of the world and inaccessible except by air-drops and this can be done within hours of a disaster with aircraft streaming in just a minute or less apart if you have that many aircraft and there is never a single security person on the ground and there is no rioting and little, if any, fighting, just a scramble to be the first to grab the supplies. Letting victims die and riot for utter lack of food or water with the excuse that troops have to be on the ground first to prevent "riots" over the food if it is air-dropped, as the former C.I.A. Director now Defense Secretary told a press conference after the earthquake, is either incredibly stupid or deliberate. If there are enough air drops and, if necessary, announcements over loud speakers from airplanes that there is lots more coming and there will be enough for everybody -- or even if there is not -- will prevent any starvation or rioting because people will share and eat just half a loaf for the most part. In a letter to the press after Katrina I had said that the mischievous smile on Cheney's face as Bush described to his cabinet and others how aid was reaching New Orleans in the form of an aircraft carrier a week after the disaster, etc. was due to deliberate delay because the victims were mostly non-white. It was similarly deliberate in Haiti.

Relevant to the starvation of the Haitians is the similarly deliberate starvation I underwent for up to three weeks at a time living in that M.I.T. library (above) with the fullest knowledge and participation of the Indians at M.I.T., the Indian government, the American government, media, academia (before I was terminated from Harvard, B. F. Skinner's assistant, Robert Epstein, came to my office in William James Hall at Harvard to tell me 'If you find yourself without food or shelter, go check into a hospital'; the question is -- why should someone with my background, my achievements, acknowledged by B. F. Skinner himself, my connections, etc. ever find himself without food or shelter but that is what they had planned and that is exactly what happened though Indira Gandhi was prime minister again when I was starving in that M.I.T. library; after three weeks of starvation, I went to Cambridge Hospital where the physician asked me, as hospitals do, who they could contact if something happens to me and I gave them the name of B. F. Skinner; he called Skinner who told him I am "a very capable", person, etc. and he refused to admit me saying "you are a very capable" person; on a second attempt, at Massachusetts General Hospital, the physician told me "This is not the Holiday Inn!"), numerous foreign governments, etc., etc., because of my race, as have been all the other crimes, including starvation and homelessness, of India's and the world's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, without any need of air-drops, in the glare of 24-hour surveillance by satellite -- which continue to this day, with the participation of the C.I.A. Director (see attachments to this E-Mail), Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, etc., then and now, not to speak of the Clintons, the Bushes, the Reagans, the Times of India, the Nehru family, Vajpayee and any one else you can think of -- and yes, the participation of Haitians in the U.S.

A letter in the New York Times of January 26, 2010, under the heading "Out of Tragedy, Questions About God", says "Instead of admitting that we do not know how to reconcile a loving God with terrible disasters like Haiti ...". Can you imagine the punishment that awaits the Americans and the Indians? While I lived in that M.I.T. library in 1980, a Haitian immigrant who worked as a janitor there repeatedly and violently threw himself against the door of the stall in the men's room where I was using the toilet till I gave out a submissive squeak and, in 1981, when I had paid good money to rent a room in the Cambridge YMCA, a Haitian immigrant behind the reception counter gratuitously and out of the blue said to me, a guest, "He thinks he is something! He is NOTHING!" and then told me I was "Fresh!". An elderly white American, another guest, sitting in the lounge in front of the reception counter, toward whom I looked appealingly, looked utterly shocked and outraged and said to me "Talk to him!". Years later, a Haitian young woman celebrated and taunted me about the degradation being imposed on me by the Americans.

ADDED FEBRUARY 3-13, 2010: At my new address, the wireless internet connection is not working. So this is just a quick transmission with an ethernet cable from a cold basement. I said above that, with the most advanced civilization in the world, Indians can come up with numerous ways to enhance their aggression. One way is Brahmacharya. Veerya literally means bravery; when you lose your Veerya, you lose your bravery; when you retain your Veerya, you enhance your bravery. As Indians ought to know, even imaginings of a carnal nature are a form of Maithun and make you lose your bravery. The litmus test of Indians lifting themselves out of hell will be when they start treating the Americans as the untouchables they are. They can start by treating the untouchables in India as untouchables, including an untouchable such as Manmohan Singh (most Sikhs are from Hindus of the lower castes). A landmark will be when Indians throw the untouchable woman ruling as the empress of India from 10 Janpath from an airplane. Focus on enhancing your aggression; economic prosperity and military dominance over the globe will follow. That is all for now.

Since the problem is the Dravidian genes of the present day Indians, it is questionable whether the Indians can lift themselves out of hell. By enhancing their aggression -- thus changing their behavior -- they may be able to change their gene expression. This is their only hope and the best advice one can give them. Since the genes of the Indians in the land of the Rig Veda, Afghanistan, are not so badly compromised, these Indians may be able to cleanse the rest of the subcontinent. But instead of first developing nuclear weapons, without which they cannot cope with the external aggressors, they have been instigated by the C.I.A. to make ineffectual, premature attacks on the external enemy, to give the United States an excuse to invade and occupy their lands so as to impose slavery on them and pre-empt any challenges to U.S. dominance. So it is not clear that even the Indians in the land of the Rig Veda will succeed. The Indians in the so-called Pakistan have nuclear weapons but with nigger slaves such as Zardari as their heads, the Pakistani Indians seem just as doomed as the Dravidians of the rest of the subcontinent.

Dravidian genes are Dasyu genes, slave genes. Slaves have their uses. They can be extremely useful. But don't let them be rulers and decision makers. The division of work in society according to caste (that is genes) must be observed. I had said to Govind Sharan Singh above, in 1979-80, that people such as Atal Behari Vajpayee swear by "Democracy", the task assigned to him as well as to Jawaharlal Nehru by their British masters. But, I said to him, India needs not "Democracy" but "Dharma, social order!" The quote above from the Bhagvad Gita in fuller form is:
"Yada Yada Hi Dharmasya Glanir Bhavati Bharata
Abhyutthanam Adharmasya Tadatmanam Srijamy aham.
Paritranaya Sadhunam Vinashayacha Dushkritam
Dharma Sansthapanarthaya Sambhavami Yuge Yuge."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szuOU-g4h-g

India's missile men on India-Forum on February 9, 2010 said: "As Shri Sathish Chandra mentioned long ago, Agni-3 is a very flexible rocket platform that give rise a family of missiles; with varied payload combination and rocket stages that can mixed and matched for various performance configurations. Agni-3TD has validated the base elements of rocketery on which these varients can easily morph."
In response, the Indian government had the heads of DRDO and its missile lab on February 10, 2010 say India has no plans to develop missiles of more than about a 5,000-kilometer range, does not need more than a handful of missiles, its missiles do not maneuver, has no plans for missiles to shoot down satellites, etc.
I said above "India's missile men bloody well know who the prime mover of India's strategic program is, in the present as in the past, without whom India is destined to be a country of bhangis cleaning the white man's bottom. But like Indian slaves in all other categories -- politicians, the media, civil servants, the military, academics, the general public, etc. -- they keep a studied silence about it and keep referring to various flecks of ignorant filth when they talk about India's strategic program. This is part of ALL Indians' behavior as collaborators, by acts of omission and commission, with India's enemies in their crimes against India. This must change if they, or India, are to survive."
Before that I said above "the Soviet Union had no dearth of SSBNs, including the mighty Typhoons, but was brought down by its enemy by controlling the behavior of the Soviets in various ways. C.I.A.-RAW is trying to control the behavior of India's missile men, to confuse and delay, pending assassination, by trying to induce pity and horror by posting a video of U.S. strategic bombing victims in North Korea, showing them progress of India's strategic program by giving a privileged look at India's SSBN in the works, etc. These are relevant only as the enemy's countermeasures; the enemy and his agents remain committed to bringing India under the deepest slavery unless the nuclear destruction of New Delhi proceeds without being defeated by countermeasures like such distractions. There is no alternative to obeying India's legitimate ruler who has the necessary knowledge, intelligence, courage and character."
Before that I said above "Just as Shastri was assassinated by the KGB at the request of the C.I.A. and the head of India's submarine launched ballistic missile program was similarly killed in Moscow (addendum dated December 18, 2008 above), the Russian 'help' for the Indian SSBN program (there are hundreds of Russian 'consultants' on this program in India) was at the request of the C.I.A. , to ensure India never has any such capability before it is thoroughly enslaved through the nuclear deal (which had been in the works for decades, as I have said), the military purchases and equipment monitoring requirements, etc. and, after due delays, it is thoroughly bugged and sabotaged and incapable of doing anything the white masters don't want it to do, like the aircraft carrier and other equipment. The Americans and the Russians work as a team -- a variation of the good cop-bad cop routine -- with help from RAW, which is loyal to both. It is not too late for India's missile men to come to their senses and start obeying India's legitimate ruler."
Before that I said above "The behavior of India's missile men may be no worse and a lot better than that of Indian politicians, civil servants, army chief, etc. But only nuclear-armed missiles are crucial and needed for defending India against the United States by destroying this enemy. Therefore, their role is unlike any one else in government. Manmohan Singh or K. Subrahmanyam and thousands of others can continue their behavior as traitors; it matters little for India's victory over its enemy. But the behavior of India's missile men matters. They have a special responsibility and have to be held accountable like no one else. Doing what they need to do involves no sacrifice and a lot of gain for them as well as India. They cannot continue on a path of least resistance. Disrespect for India's legitimate ruler will have a lot more serious consequences than, say, disrespect for A. P. J. Abdul Kalam who got his job in India's missile program thanks to India's legitimate ruler; see the letter dated May 15, 2004 below. The current incumbents in India's missile program similarly have their jobs thanks to India's legitimate ruler. Kalam failed to obey India's legitimate ruler in the matter of the nuclear deal. Such disobedience must not continue. In the matter of Kalam being frisked by an American airline, it is relevant that Kalam did nothing to protect India's honor -- his personal humility is irrelevant -- and meekly submitted. Such a person has no ability to protect India's interests and is unfit to be in any leadership position. This is true of all of India's 'leaders' such as Manmohan Singh. There is no Indian other than myself who has been protecting India's interests and is India's natural and legitimate leader/ruler. India's enemies know this and have targeted him for the past 32 years, spending hundreds of millions of dollars a year on 'neutralizing' him. But India's missile men must obey him because of their crucial role, regardless of what other Indians do. RAW is the instrument by which India's enemy, the United States, rules India. If they find it more convenient, India's missile men can launch a sub-kiloton nuclear warhead at the RAW headquarters and launch a 17-kiloton or larger warhead at North and South Blocks if necessary."
But after that I said above "Nor will a sub-kiloton warhead launched at RAW headquarters suffice. It has to be a 17-kiloton [or larger] warhead launched at RAW headquarters and a 17-kiloton [or larger] warhead launched at North and South Blocks."

Even at this moment, the United States' satellites are doing immense damage to India -- ranging from the operation against "Shri Sathish Chandra" for the past thirty three years to the manipulation of Indian election results to put American puppets in office in India and need to be shot down without the slightest delay.

Despite the genetic pollution of the rest of India's population, simply killing each and every Tamil snake regardless of appearances will enable India to survive and purify itself. This is a simple and easy to follow rule.
A Tamil snake named "Ramana" on Bharat-Rakshak is publicising a red herring floated by Tamil snakes of capitulation to China. But capitulation to China is just a corollary of capitulation, which Tamil enemies such as K. Subrahmanyam have been promoting, to the United States which has already invaded and is occupying the part of India that is the land of the Rig Veda and will expand its occupation to the rest of the subcontinent. The behavior of the United States' Chinese slaves -- for which the United States' contempt is only slightly less than its contempt for Indians -- is at the prompting of the United States which remains the enemy to destroy; China and all other threats will automatically be taken care of.
Such red herrings, besides wasting time, are meant to distract from the action needed NOW against the United States and are meant to shift the focus from resisting the United States to resisting China for which, according to the Tamil snakes, India must submit to the United States.
Kill the Tamil snakes and rub the United States out of existence is India's agenda.

Start with the Tamil snakes in the Cabinet and the civil service and work your way down. Both the Home Minister and Home Secretary are Tamil snakes. But simultaneously deal with the Tamil snakes in the streets and at every level and in every nook and cranny. Start from the bottom up, from the middle, start everywhere. Start with the Tamil snakes in the Supreme Court, in the media, in shops and factories and residential colonies, in towns, in villages, in the cities.

ADDED ON FEBRUARY 25, 2010: Craigslist Advertisement:-
---------------------Start of advertisement-----------------------------
GMAT prep-individual instruction is MUCH better than classes
Date: 2010-02-24, 10:37PM ESTReply to: see below
I have a background in Engineering, Management and Behavioral/Social Science and provide individualized help tailored to a client's needs. My score in the Admission Test for Graduate Study in Business (as the GMAT used to be called) was the highest at the Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester and one of the highest in the United States. My GRE scores have been similar. $80/hour, scheduled according to mutual convenience. Commercial test prep companies charge more than twice this amount per hour, require you to buy a package of 15, 25 or more hours for several thousand dollars and their instructors are not one-tenth as well qualified (see below); typically, they charge you $170 per hour and pay their instructors $17 per hour; ninety percent of the fee you pay is for their marketing. [Such are the wonders of the "market economy" to which a brainless wonder -- himself a product of marketing -- called Obama swore allegiance recently to refute people who accuse him of pushing the country toward "socialism" under my influence (I am listed in Who's Who in America and Who's Who in the World). But socialist economies also require managers; they just do the production and distribution by different criteria]. You could also take test prep classes, from the commercial companies or those run by local colleges; they cost a little less than individual instruction but, with thirty two people in a class, provide you with three percent of the attention and benefit you will get from individual instruction. Tel: (401) 603-2998
----------------------------------------------------------------
With more higher education than anyone I knew on the Harvard University faculty, I have two undergraduate degrees and ten years of graduate work in three different fields (2 years in Engineering, at Carnegie-Mellon University and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; two years in Management, at the University of Rochester Graduate School of Management; and six years in Psychology -- at the State University of New York at Buffalo and Harvard University). I am a member of the New York Academy of Sciences, Association for Psychological Science and American Chemical Society. I have been providing educational help to private clients for decades. This has included individual teaching of students with various issues at the graduate (such as helping a student with a spinal injury in a Master's in Social Work program at Boston University, with clinical and other courses; in a graduate program in Sociology at Northeastern University with emotional and cultural issues, with a variety of courses; and in a graduate program in Library Science, with Research Methods and statistical analysis, etc.) and undergraduate (such as helping an English major at Tufts University with a writing block that had prevented her from graduating for several years to finally graduate; a Business major at Boston College with several suicide attempts, eating disorders and other issues, with Operations Management, etc.) levels to successfully complete their programs. Most of my clients, though, do not have such issues but would like to do better, in the standardized admission test or in the undergraduate or graduate program at various stages, including a Master's thesis or a doctoral dissertation.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Here is a question I would like to see included in the GMAT exam:- Someone I know well made a "balance transfer" to a credit card account he had opened with the Bank of America which promised a certain low rate of interest on such a transferred balance for which it charged a substantial transaction fee. A few weeks after he made the balance transfer, Bank of America raised the interest rate on the transferred amount as well as on purchases by a hefty five percent or so, based on "the pattern of your payments" though he had never made a late payment and always paid more than the minimum required except once when the minimum required was automatically paid as scheduled by him in advance. The question is (answer yes or no to each part): i) should the Bank of America executives be in jail for committing this criminal fraud; and ii) should Obama be defending their bonuses -- which he earlier referred to as "obscene" though not criminal -- running up to hundreds of millions of dollars to each of certain individual executives obtained by such criminal fraud because, according to him, 'this is what the market economy is about'; and iii) with Obama spending hundreds of billions of dollars in public money on committing crimes including fraud -- much worse fraud than the Bank of America executives' -- murder and anything else you can think of through various U.S. government agencies to keep himself and his cronies in office and benefit financially and otherwise through such crimes, he has no moral or legal authority to take action against the Bank of America executives?
-----------------------------End of advertisement---------------------

ADDED ON FEBRUARY 26-27, 2010: So far as India is concerned, this is all that matters:-
Kill the Tamil Snakes
http://killthetamilsnakes.blogspot.com/

Let's get on with it!

Just now I found in my Hotmail Inbox an E-Mail "From: satchandra04@msn.com on behalf of Rahul Mehta (mehtarahulc@yahoo.com)" sent to a large group of people, containing a set of questions that I have had nothing to do with. As I have said repeatedly above and below, C.I.A.-RAW have all my E-Mail and other passwords, etc. and have repeatedly demonstrated sending E-Mails to me from my own E-mail accounts as well as to others. Tamil snakes like K. Subrahmanyam have been engaging in such harassment and crimes against me in collaboration with the C.I.A. (see the attachments to this E-mail) for decades through their satellite surveillance of me and interference with my communications, etc. I have NOT sent any E-Mail to any one "on behalf of Rahul Mehta" or any one else and this is another one of the Tamil snakes' doings in collaboration with C.I.A.-RAW.
At various times, I have quoted, above and below, from various posts on Bharat-Rakshak, India-Forum, Pakistan Defence Forum, etc. many of which are from C.I.A.-RAW operatives. One such quote was from a Rahul Mehta on Bharat-Rakshak; I don't know whether he is a C.I.A.-RAW operative or who the hell he is or what is the purpose of claiming that the above E-Mail containing a set of questions purportedly from his web site was being sent by me 'on behalf of him', but I have nothing to do with him, the above E-Mail or the questions it contains.

The above is another distraction from C.I.A.-RAW. But Indians have to focus like a laser beam on this:-
Kill the Tamil Snakes
http://killthetamilsnakes.blogspot.com/

ADDED ON MARCH 13, 2010: With billions of dollars in C.I.A. money with which she rules India, the Italian woman naturally calls the Tamil snakes her allies but Indians have to kill the Tamil snakes:
http://killthetamilsnakes.blogspot.com/

Of course, the C.I.A.'s billions are hundreds of times, thousands of times, recouped by it from India. As I have said below, when the proposal to import two Russian nuclear reactors was first floated through Vajpayee, the Department of Atomic Energy had strenuously opposed it saying it will only benefit the Russian nuclear industry, etc. Now all the objections (below) to the import of foreign nuclear reactors, technology, fuel, etc. have been forgotten. A headline in India's C.I.A.-controlled press on March 12, 2010 in the Hindustan Times called the plans to import Russian nuclear reactors a Russian "gift" to India. The same about the import of foreign defence technology and equipment (below). As I have said, there should be an iron-clad rule against the import of foreign technology and equipment and all these trillions of rupees must be pumped into Indian research, development and production. This is not being done because of the Tamil snakes (see the attachments to this E-mail). Solving all the problems of India -- economic, defence -- requires killing the Tamil snakes and rubbing the United States out of existence and this is India's agenda.

No other Indian has the knowledge, intelligence, courage or character to accomplish what needs to be done. That is why the Tamil snakes and the serpent United States have focused all their efforts against the undersigned.

"Yada Yada Hi Dharmasya Glanir Bhavati Bharata
Abhyutthanam Adharmasya Tadatmanam Srjamy aham.
Paritranaya Sadhunam Vinashaya cha Dushkritam
Dharma Sansthapanarthaya Sambhavami Yuge Yuge."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szuOU-g4h-g

ADDED ON APRIL 2 - JULY 8, 2010: The stupidity and cowardice of India's missile men is responsible for all of India's problems. They occupy themselves with unproductive activities when all that is needed is prepositioning India's nuclear bombs in U.S. cities OR getting rid of the traitor regime in New Delhi.

I have said all of the insurgencies in India are sponsored and controlled by C.I.A.-RAW. The new Army chief had said the Army will no longer participate in anti-insurgency operations which have reduced the effective strength of the Indian Army by half; to neutralise that, RAW carried out the slaughter of 75 CRPF personnel just as the slaughter of IPKF in Sri Lanka was with the help of RAW-provided intelligence by RAW-controlled LTTE and Kargil was a C.I.A.-RAW sponsored operation to help Vajpayee remain in office. The stupidity and cowardice of the Indian Army is similar to that of India's missile men. There is no hope for India unless they start obeying India's legitimate ruler.

In response to the above paragraph, Obama has summoned American servant Manmohan Singh for a hurriedly arranged meeting -- for which he advanced his trip by 36 hours -- on Sunday. The global nuclear meeting -- the original purpose of the trip -- like all American initiatives is meant to disarm other countries and enhance and preserve American dominance. Nothing that this C.I.A.- appointed traitor agrees to will bind India.

MAY 1, 2010: A C.I.A.-RAW operative on Bharat-Rakshak made a series of posts, directed at India’s missile men on India-Forum, to the effect that “We are sold out to America as a nation” and persuaded the latter that it is the ‘incentivization’ of the “political system (and its elites)” which is responsible for keeping India “weak” and not RAW and the Tamil snakes who bring about and maintain this state of affairs. Worms like Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh are not India’s “elite” nor was Nehru who was a life-long British agent, as I have said. There is only one elite in India “whose toe nail clippings are worth more to India and the world than the rest of the billion-plus Indians combined” , on suppressing whom the United States has been spending hundreds of millions of dollars per year including 24-hour satellite surveillance for the past 33 years.
To ‘neutralise’ what I have said above about C.I.A.-RAW sponsoring and controlling all insurgencies in India, RAW has staged a revelation that CRPF and U.P. police personnel sold arms and ammunition to the insurgents. There have been thousands of such staged events including one that ascribes the blame for the radioactive material found in Delhi to Delhi University and not to India being made a garbage dump for the United States and many staged attacks on Indians in Australia to keep Indians coming to U.S. universities because they were increasingly going elsewhere and Indian students coming to the U.S. is a major avenue of the United States’ control of India and its “elite”.
When Obama patronizingly patted Manmohan Singh on the back/arms, which a columnist in The Telegraph lamented, it was to reassure him of continued C.I.A. and United States protection and support for which he had summoned Manmohan Singh to a hurriedly arranged meeting, as Bill Clinton’s trip to India to meet Vajpayee in Lucknow was to assure him of continued C.I.A. money and support in response to something I wrote about Kargil, etc.
I have said, one, that RAW’s number one mission -- see ‘What You Should Know About RAW’ -- is to keep India technologically weak and dependent and, two, that tanks and fighter planes are worthless for delivering nuclear bombs to the continental United States which is all that matters for India’s defence. Pakistan itself is “a firangi-controlled insurgency within India, created by the firangis to serve their purposes”. Taking care of C.I.A.-RAW’s and the Tamil snakes’ suppression of India’s greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian will take care of all of India’s problems.
MAY 2, 2010: I have said that both India’s RAW and Pakistan’s ISI are branches of the C.I.A. ; RAW is used to commit terrorist acts in Pakistan as well as in India and ISI is used to commit terrorist acts in India as well as in Pakistan -- with each other’s knowledge and cooperation. The Indian woman diplomat in the embassy in Pakistan arrested for spying for Pakistan was a conduit for RAW -- her boss was a RAW man -- providing information to ISI; she, RAW and ISI -- all were working for their C.I.A. masters.
MAY 3, 2010: In the 26/11 attack on Mumbai, India’s RAW was as much a participant as Pakistan’s ISI and the entire operation was supervised by that C.I.A. man in a Mumbai hotel. It was the United States which was waging war against India. Kargil, the attack on Parliament and numerous other such events were carried out by the C.I.A. for the benefit of their agent Vajpayee who, while occupying the post of prime minister, was waging war against India; ultimately, it is the United States which has been waging war against India for several decades.
MAY 12, 2010: According to a report “[ dnaindia.com , May 12, 2010]: India will soon have an umbrella organisation of investigating agencies to provide quick-time response to the demand for information on suspected terrorists and offenders of the law. The National Intelligence Grid (NatGrid), a centralised data system, according to sources, has received the green signal from prime minister Manmohan Singh. The official announcement on its formation is expected in a couple of days..,NatGrid, brain-child of Union home minister P Chidambaram, will help cut down time consumed in collating data — it takes months normally — from several agencies of the government. After the creation of the National Investigating Agency (NIA) to coordinate and act on intelligence inputs on terror, this is Chidambaram’s second significant step towards an organised approach to deal with terrorist activities…According to informed sources, the data with 21 agencies and departments of government will now be forwarded to the NatGrid for integration. The data will include Pan card, voter ID card and ration card details, income tax returns, degrees obtained from schools and colleges, bank account numbers, financial transactions, travel documents, passport details, police stations and jails across the country among others…The cabinet committee on security (CCS) headed by the prime minister is understood to have cleared the proposal despite serious reservations expressed by the ministries of finance and defence…Sources say finance minister Pranab Mukherjee objected to the proposal of NatGrid on the grounds that it will violate the privacy law. Defence minister AK Antony reportedly expressed reservations contending that the system of Joint Intelligence Committee, where all top notch intelligence agencies share information, was working satisfactorily; hence there was no need for a new body…
Chidambaram has been insisting on the creation of NatGrid on the grounds that a centralised data system is essential to fight terrorism and crimes in the country. A large number of investigating agencies, including Research & Analysis Wing (RAW), Intelligence Bureau, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Narcotics Control Bureau, Enforcement Directorate, Central Bureau of Investigation, Military, Air & Naval Intelligence, Customs, Directorate of Income Tax (investigation), and state police agencies have loads of information with them. However, there is no umbrella organisation to maintain centralised data. It takes weeks, if not months, to cull information…“The NatGrid will provide a system of information to all the agencies about any person the moment a button is pressed,” he argued at the CCS meeting. Chidambaram managed to convince his cabinet colleagues that creation of NatGrid will go a long way in fighting terrorism. He argued that the country cannot pay the price in the name of privacy…According to sources, the prime minister was convinced that such an agency will help security and intelligence agency in achieving the goals set to fight terror and reduce time taken to track criminals…After NatGrid, Chidambaram’s next mission is to create the National Counter Terrorism Council (NCTC), an umbrella body to fight terror.” This is part of what I said on November 20, 2009 above: “While RAW has always been a branch of the C.I.A., the Tamil traitor-enemy Chidambaram has made other Indian intelligence agencies branches of the United States intelligence agencies, bringing in U.S. equipment to India to enable comprehensive real-time monitoring and interception ability for the U.S. of all communications in India, a comprehensive and total censorship power to the United States of not only what gets into the Indian media of all kinds but even communications between individuals, bringing India into a colonial grip of and slavery to the United States such as has never been seen in human history.”
India’s missile men are sitting back doing nothing, sunk as they are in their stupidity and cowardice.
MAY 16, 2010: I have said that the failed Christmas bombing of an airliner in Chicago last year was staged by the C.I.A. and had no doubt that the failed car bombing in New York recently was also staged by the C.I.A. Just saw something on Bharat-Rakshak “Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP)” thread which confirms this: the U.S. television talk show host Jay Leno said “It is interesting: U.S. investigators are trying to understand how the Times Square bomber took numerous trips back and forth to Pakistan even though he the guy’s name was on the no-fly list. Know what I think happened? I think the government confused the no-fly last with the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ list”. The correct answer is that, like Headley of the 26/11 attacks on Mumbai whom the Americans have been protecting, this failed New York bomber was working for the C.I.A. which is the sponsor of ALL terrorism in the subcontinent as the U.S. official’s testimony to the U.S. Congress that I have cited above admitted.
MAY 18, 2010: In response to the above paragraph “The White House is dispatching national security adviser Gen. James L. Jones and CIA director Leon R. Panetta to Pakistan to push Islamabad to intensify efforts to investigate the Times Square bomb plot and take steps to close terror’s “safe haven” in that country, according to the New York Times./ … Jones … might ask Pakistan’s military to push harder into North Waziristan … other possible American requests … were more intense surveillance of suspected terrorists and allowing more American military advisers [ an American mode of their colonial supervision of a country’s armed forces ] to operate in Pakistan./ The United States is also proposing to open a new consulate in Quetta … where the CIA would likely have a sizable presence. … The Obama administration sees the Times Square a reason to push the Pakistanis to do several things it has long desired, the Times said.” (IANS report on Hindustantimes.com , May 18, 2010). “ “Sometimes things like this are an opportunity”, the official said”, according to the above New York Times report. The C.I.A.-sponsored terrorism in the subcontinent has been used to establish full-fledged colonial rule over Afghanistan (a part of India), creeping colonial rule over Pakistan (a part of India) and is well on its way to bringing the rest of India in its colonial grip (see the paragraph dated May 12, 2010 above). The Tamil enemies who have brought external occupiers into India continue on that path: “PC [the Tamil enemy P. Chidambaram ] seeks greater mandate to take on Maoists” (headline on dailypioneer.com, May 18, 2010). I have repeatedly shown that all India’s political parties -- Congress, BJP, CPM and CPI -- are controlled by the C.I.A. Is it the Dravidian genes they carry which makes India’s missile men continue to disobey India’s legitimate ruler? They have all the orders they need and must act, NOW!
Various pieces of dog-faeces in India are busy giving the Americans the ‘opportunities’ referred to above, with service chiefs, ministers, politicians, etc. routinely referring to threats “in our neighbourhood”. But the United States is EVERYBODY’s neighbour; it has already invaded the Indian subcontinent and is occupying parts of it. As I once asked these pieces of dog-faeces (May 14, 2006 below) “Was Britain India’s neighbour?” Taking care of the United States and the Tamil snakes will take care of all other threats. I said (see “Why Nuclear Supremacy?” below) “Start with India’s Army Chief and ask “Are you in favour of strategic nuclear parity with, or supremacy over, the United States as a national objective?” If the answer is not “Yes”, he should be shot on the spot. The same for all other generals and admirals, etc. The same for Manmohan Singh and members of his Cabinet. The same for leaders of political parties. The same for journalists writing on the nuclear deal. The same for ‘strategic analysts’, etc.” All these pieces of dog-faeces will be taken care of in one fell swoop. India’s missile men should try not to be like all the pieces of dog-faeces that litter the Indian landscape.
MAY 21, 2010: The Agni II missile should not be used for “rolling down … Rajpath [as] show and tell to those who matter”. Its only use is to get rid of those pieces of dog-faeces with a launch against RAW headquarters and another against North and South Blocks so India can get on with the task of defending itself against the United States.
MAY 22, 2010: In view of the immense suffering and losses on India being inflicted by the above pieces of dog-faeces, the deaths of 160 passengers (all of whom were in that plane because of the immense suffering and losses on India being inflicted by the above pieces of dog-faeces) is of little moment but, in a typical show of their stupidity and cowardice, India’s missile men mourn the deaths of these 160 air passengers instead of getting rid of the above pieces of dog-faeces with the two launches above.
I once said (below) about the piece of dog-faeces Manmohan Singh that ‘It does not matter whether he is beaten to death, machine-gunned or run over with a tank; the sooner this criminal-traitor is executed, the better for the country. But the service chiefs who will have to do it are themselves pieces of dog-faeces. The only way to get rid of all these pieces of dog-faeces is by means of the two missile launches above. That is why I said above that India’s missile men should try not to be like all the pieces of dog-faeces that litter the Indian landscape.

MAY 27, 2010: India’s missile men said [Start quote]: “[Chandragupta, on 27 May 2010 - 06:35 PM, said:] “Whether its behind the screens or not, Indian missiles does need to have a lot of throw weight capability for any stated range. And If MIRV is taken into account, then definitely they need to for annihilating a nation in second strike. Because those in BARC screwed us a big time. They want us to do repetitive tests to prove the consistency of the carrier, but unfortunately they didn’t proved their consistency … In this kind of scenario, everyone is totally dependant on us which makes sense that we need to have a large throw weight capable missiles for any stated ranges. And guess what? they are having overflowing supplies of fissile materials in their warehouses and labs, but not in a position to test the designed warheads and wants us to test our systems instead to prove reliability.... I donno how fair is this theory. But at the end of the day we are obeying our orders and making systems with throw weights of twice the stated while taking the whip.”

BARC's R Chidambram of fizzle bum fame ki Jai Ho .....All because of BARC's failure, that India now needs a missile force armed with puny yield bombs, so that must now be capable of delivering 10 x time more warhead weights. Need 10x more nuclear powered submarines (protected by ring of 10x more hunter killer N submarines), and missiles that are 2-3 times heavier to deliver the heavy fission/FBF payload at ranges that will deter interventionist countries that are beyond immediate oceans. A very heavy price India has to pay for follies of BARC and R Chidambram.” [End Quote].

No one who takes national security seriously -- only the undersigned in all of India does -- will sit back quietly with a few sarcastic “fizzle bum fame ki Jai Ho …”, etc. What prevents India from carrying out more nuclear weapons tests NOW? Nothing except India’s missile men’s stupidity and cowardice, refusal to obey orders of India’s legitimate ruler and their continuing to collaborate with India’s enemies in ‘screwing India big time’. In other words, India’s missile men are behaving like all the other pieces of dog-faeces that litter the Indian landscape. India’s nuclear bombs and missiles are meant to kill enemies with. The biggest enemies, the ones who need to be killed first, are there waiting to be killed i) in RAW headquarters and ii) North and South Blocks.
In the “(Expanded) Press Release August 27, 2008” below I wrote: “4. It was to neutralize my saying that Vajpayee’s “Hate is not on the agenda” amounted to saying “Defence is not on the agenda” (see “A Note About Hate” below) that the C.I.A. arranged for Vajpayee to carry out the 1998 nuclear tests, to be followed by a capping of India’s nuclear program, signing the CTBT, etc. The United States had made a big show of having been surprised by the tests and announced a drastic increase in its intelligence agents in India, etc. and, in a letter to the press right after the tests saying that the tests had been pre-arranged with the United States, I asked why would any one ANNOUNCE they will increase the number of intelligence agents in India, etc. ? A little before the tests, a report in the Times of India -- which disappeared shortly after I saw it on the Internet -- referred to pressures, both internal and external, not to carry out the tests. Such pressures could only be exerted if the external power exerting the pressure knew about the impending tests. … “. It is by collaborating in the conspiracy of silence about the undersigned that India’s missile men are collaborating with India’s enemies because it is through their crimes against the undersigned that India’s enemies have been committing their crimes against India.

MAY 28, 2010: DRDO should undertake to design, develop and test thermonuclear weapons independently of the Department of Atomic Energy -- under a mandate from the undersigned who is also the father of India’s strategic program including the Integrated Guided Missiles Development Program -- setting up whatever facilities are needed for the purpose and commandeering raw materials for the purpose from wherever they are produced. Any interference with this program -- or even if there is no interference -- will lead to the long-overdue nuclear destruction of RAW headquarters and North and South Blocks. DRDO should keep the nation informed of the progress of this program. India’s missile men could start a thread titled “Developing Thermonuclear Weapons Within DRDO” on India-Forum for this purpose.

JUNE 1, 2010: If it was the Tamil snake R. Chidambaram who was responsible for ‘screwing India big time’ in 1998, will India’s missile men discharge their responsibility to kill this Tamil snake and those who are sheltering him as Science Adviser to the Prime Minister to this day and, even more importantly, to rectify the situation by resuming the development and testing of thermonuclear weapons within DRDO as India’s legitimate ruler and the only one in India who takes national security seriously has said they must do? If there are problems which make the development and testing of thermonuclear weapons within DRDO impossible, what are they? Is it not because they have been bought by another Tamil snake and C.I.A. agent K. Subrahmanyam (see the attachments to this E-Mail)? Why are they silent about THIS Tamil snake (K. Subrahmanyam) despite documentary evidence (in the attachments to this E-Mail) of his treachery to India and being a C.I.A. agent?

JUNE 2, 2010: On a You Tube video regarding Israel's attack on the aid flotilla, I posted the following comment:
"I have always held that India should use its nuclear weapons to wipe Israel from the face of the Earth. Unfortunately, Israel and America rule India via its Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), the Tamil snakes and India's stupid 'educated' class (I have more higher education than anyone I knew on the Harvard University faculty). For my views, click on my user name, then click on my blog ('Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.') in my profile."
To this an Indian named vishalgutsy from C.I.A.-RAW commented:
"ure a jackass , if u think that."
To this I responded:
"This piece of dog-faeces named vishalgutsy is typical of the pieces of dog-faeces that litter the Indian landscape. They are unfit even to be made into dog-food.
"He is from RAW which follows me wherever I make a post on the Internet and makes some such hostile and abusive post. As you will see from my blog, their days are numbered."
Then another Indian from RAW named manusharmaaugust commented:
"Retard!!! Self-contradicting sentences... Such as "I have more higher education..." WTF????? Learn the language before commenting."
To this I responded:
"This illiterate piece of dog-faeces who cannot read or write is telling India's greatest scientist and greatest living Indian who, incidentally, has more higher education than any one he knew on the Harvard faculty to 'learn the language', etc. Unfit even to be made into dogfood, such Indians will be used as fertiliser to grow onions, stinking onions!"
I added:
"As a rule, Indians are inferior Indian niggers, unfit to talk about strategic matters [especially if it involves the white master in any way, which it always does]. That is why in his only reference to India in his Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler said "As for India, I would rather see India under the British than under any one else".
"It is not just that a handful of the British from half way around the world ruled India for centuries; a lot of other people from various countries did that for a thousand years before that. A modern day Babar will start each day by killing a million Indians before breakfast every morning, though I think 3 million will be better (this number can be herded into fairly small extermination circles and then a Neutron Bomb exploded over them).
"I am an Indian but as far above the other Indians as they may be above cockroaches ( click on my user name, then on my web site -- 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' -- in my profile."

Right now the United States is bombing and killing in Indian territory(Afghanistan and Pakistan) at will and literally occupying large parts of it and the Indian nigger slaves are in Washington for a "strategic dialogue" with their white master while Indian press headlines breathlessly report the white master is promising again to make India a great power. What I said about wiping Israel off the face of the Earth was first and foremost because of the injuries Israel and the jews have inflicted on India, not because of their crimes against Palestinians.

I am still waiting for a response from DRDO as to what is preventing it from undertaking the development and testing of thermonuclear weapons within DRDO.

About one of the members -- Kapil Sibal -- of the inferior Indian nigger team in Washington for a "strategic dialogue" with their white masters I said above that he "will be publicly tortured in a stadium full of people, disemboweled and dragged around by his intestines around his neck before he is skinned alive and fed to dogs for this and other crimes, along with Manmohan Singh, of course." The same applies to the other members of the inferior Indian nigger team.
India needs enough thermonuclear warheads to destroy the territory of the United States from coast to coast, from New York to Los Angeles and everything in between and from Chicago to Houston and everything in between. For this India needs ten thousand thermonuclear warheads. To produce them, all of India's nuclear reactors will be run in the military mode.

JUNE 4, 2010: The C.I.A. tried to have me run down by a car backing out of a drive way at jet speed as I walked home on the side walk near my home about 2 p.m. today. A loud "MOTHER FUCKER .....!!!" by the black man just before he tried to run me down showed he had been primed for the task.

JUNE 5, 2010: I have said about half a dozen times here and it needs to be said again: a laser ignition facility CANNOT be a substitute for full-yield explosive tests of nuclear weapons; anyone who says otherwise is like R. Chidambaram, an ignoramus or a traitor or both and is sabotaging India's national security and that will not be permitted. To cite C.I.A. agent Manmohan Singh's capping of India's nuclear program as the reason for this is to collaborate with this C.I.A. agent instead of removing and punishing him; such people are part of the problem and deserve punishment no less severe than the C.I.A. agent Manmohan Singh himself. I have said all of India's nuclear reactors will be run in the military mode to produce ten thousand thermonuclear warheads that have undergone repeated full-yield explosive tests; anyone who talks of submitting to traitor Manmohan Singh's "capping" of India's nuclear program and proposes stupid alternatives to field testing such as laser ignition facilities -- which can only be adjuncts in designing weapons, not substitutes for full-yield explosive tests and, in India's case, will cause unacceptable and unnecessary delays even in designing weapons -- is himself a traitor and will be treated as such.
With an arsenal of ten thousand thermonuclear weapons, India will, of course, need a full fledged stewardship program -- though India's arsenal will be used to DESTROY its enemies for crimes already committed, not to play a stupid game of 'deterrence' -- but that does not mean that tools that can be useful in the stewardship of the arsenal can substitute for full yield field tests for creating the arsenal in the first place. Yes, deterrence will be needed while the arsenal is being created and for that nuclear weapons pre-positioned in American cities by India's special forces -- this can be done in a matter of days and weeks starting today -- will serve beautifully.

JUNE 8, 2010: A PTI story on June 7, 2010, began "US feels that Kashmir issue won't be part of the agenda during talks between foreign ministers of India and Pakistan next month ... ". I sent the following comment to the editors of PTI, of Times of India and The Pioneer (where I saw this story): "Pieces of dog-faeces, why, in a story about talks between India and Pakistan, is the focus on what the White Master "feels" or says about the talks?". The answer is that India's Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) which controls the media and the entire government, is a branch of the C.I.A., is itself controlled by the Tamil snake K. Subrahmanyam who has been responsible for shutting the undersigned from the Indian media and is responsible for bringing India to this pathetic state. To repeat -- the Tamil snake K. Subrahmanyam who, as the C.I.A.'s 'viceroy in charge of India', has controlled RAW -- which has always been on the payroll of the C.I.A. -- is responsible for this pathetic state of India, including the fact that absolutely no one in India moves against this Tamil snake despite documentary evidence of his being a C.I.A. agent in the attachments to my E-mailed press releases for the past several months. The C.I.A. rules India via RAW and the Tamil snakes. All that it needs to do to keep India down is to keep the undersigned out because absolutely no one in India has a millionth part of the ability of the undersigned to save India.

JUNE 11, 2010 PRESS RELEASE: WORLD NEEDS A BETTER WAY THAN BHOPAL GAS LEAK TO EUTHANIZE INDIA'S POPULATION
By Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 557, Buffalo, NY 14209, U.S.A.
Telephone: (401) 603-2998
E-Mail: satchandrag@gmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Blog: http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com

1. Force is the foundation of sovereignty and justice. At the time of the 26/11 attacks on Mumbai, U.S. government officials arrived in Mumbai uninvited, "brusquely" told Indian officials they are U.S. government officials and do not need papers to come and, instead of arresting and jailing these invaders (see my blog 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' : http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com ), the Indian government pretended it had invited them, gave them immediate and unlimited access to all evidence and the sole surviving attacker, etc. The U.S. government routinely demands that terror suspects in other countries be "rendered" to it -- that is, turned over to it without any legal proceedings -- immediately. As I described in my letter in the American Lawyer and in my Op-Ed article in Charleston Gazette in 1985, the suit against Union Carbide filed in Federal District Court in New York was dismissed because of my friend-of-the-court brief which showed how it will harm Indian sovereignty. The exercise of sovereignty by India to get Warren Anderson extradited to India requires the following: About 30,000 Indians were killed in the Bhopal gas leak. India should announce that ten times as many Americans will be killed by a nuclear explosion in an American city by a nuclear bomb prepositioned by India's special forces unless Warren Anderson is turned over to India by a certain deadline, such as within a week of the demand. And that if there is any retaliation against India, more such prepositioned nuclear bombs will go off in additional U.S. cities. See my blog, 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' ( http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com ).

2. The U.S. government claims the presence of 'terrorists' -- the term it applies to Afghan patriots such as the Taliban -- as the justification for its invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc. As I have described in my blog ('Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.'), Jews and the C.I.A. have been committing terrorist and criminal acts against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian for about 4 decades, inflicting immeasurable injuries on India, not just on this scientist. This is reason enough for India to invade & occupy the United States, demand that all jews be 'rendered' to India where they will be duly punished and the same for all C.I.A. employees, past and present. And that failure to do so will be cause for India to launch acts of war against the United Sates such as destruction of its cities by nuclear bombs prepositioned in U.S. cities by India's special forces.

3. Since all the above crimes of the C.I.A. have taken place with the fullest knowledge and participation of U.S. presidents, India should demand that all living U.S. presidents from Carter onwards be "rendered" to India (in the case of dead presidents, their bones should be dug up and rendered to India) where they or their bones will be tendered in a tank of concentrated sulfuric acid before being ground up for use as fertiliser.

4. The United States has committed far bigger crimes against India than Bhopal for which India must destroy the United States's territory from coast to coast, from New York to Los Angeles and from Chicago to Houston with ten thousand thermonuclear warheads (see my blog 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.'). This requires killing RAW and the Tamil snakes and the Nehru family which has been the designated ruler of India first by British intelligence and later by the C.I.A.

5. I have written (see my blog 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.') that 'a modern day Babar will start each day by killing a million Indians before breakfast every morning, though I think 3 million will be better (this number can be herded into fairly small extermination circles and then a neutron bomb exploded over them)'. Indians have a choice: continue their conspiracy of silence and collaboration in crimes against the greatest living Indian and be killed like flies as they deserve to be, or change their behavior. Right now they are on the path of being killed like flies. They should not complain about Bhopal, which was a consequence of their behavior and was just a foretaste of bigger things to come. I have often said I am as far above the other Indians as they may be above cockroaches. It is highly significant that the Indians in Bhopal were killed by a gas that is used to make pesticides. That is, they died the death of insects, as they deserve to. Members of the Nehru family are among these insects. As I have said, Indira Gandhi, while Prime Minister, wrote to me on July 29, 1982, in response to my letter of July 27, 1982 to her about the crimes against me, that she was "passing it on to my Principal Secretary to deal with it", but I never heard from the Principal Secretary, P. C. Alexander. I have written that he should be hung up by the heels and asked why. He has just spoken up about Bhopal. But he should be hung up by the heels and asked about the case of infinitely greater injury to India about which Indira Gandhi wrote she was "passing it on to my Principal Secretary to deal with it".

6. I have said 95% of India's population needs to be euthanized and, as a practical matter, the entire population of India will have to be euthanized. The world needs a better method than the Bhopal Gas Leak to euthanize India's population. I have said a few hundred neutron bombs exploded over a few hundred 'extermination circles' -- each extermination circle can hold, say, 3 million Indians -- will accomplish the job.

JUNE 14, 2010: After perhaps 14 years, I had a meal of mangoes (frozen chunks which I had to thaw in a microwave oven; not quite the real thing) and milk. The last time I had such meals was when I was in India in 1996. When living at home in India, it would be unthinkable to eat anything else but mangoes from our orchards and drink milk, in the mango season. I have lived in the United States for 44 years -- an enforced exile; is there better fare to be had here? No, no, absolutely not. Give me my mangoes (we had dozens of varieties in our orchards) and milk and I would want nothing else.
The only problem is the firangis and what they have done to India. I have no alternative but to take care of the firangi problem first -- and it is taking a whole life time. Yes, the mango orchards are lovely, dark and deep. But I have promises to keep. And miles to go before I sleep. And miles to go before I sleep.
So now my focus is on those ten thousand thermonuclear warheads India has to produce, not on mangoes and milk.

Here is something I wrote several decades ago:

Singing in the bathroom
Singing in the bathroom
Is an old habit of mine
I sing old songs that I have known
For a long, long time
A line of this and a line of that
Never a whole song
I don't know any or, if I ever did
I have forgotten them
But I will continue to sing when I take a shower
And hum and whistle
For though life may hang heavy with cares on my brows
But the songs make it respectable.

But it has been over four decades since I sang while taking a shower.

JUNE 15, 2010: The Bhopal case is an illustration of what I wrote on August 8, 2009 above: "Indians are a dead, inert mass, ready to be made into atmospheric carbon dioxide. The sooner this is done, the better for all concerned. The world has the resources to do this without waiting. The temporary increase in atmospheric pollution this will cause is far outweighed by the short and long term benefits to mankind, not just of the level of pollution in the external environment but, much more importantly, of the pollution of the internal environment -- the gene pool. If there is life in Indians, it is the life characteristic of a malignant virus that needs to be destroyed as soon as possible. The heat and radiation therapy of a few hundred neutron bombs over a few hundred extermination circles will cure mankind of this affliction. Let us get on with it!"

The life of a nation includes and can be defined by the life of a leader whose psyche and genes they come to share. By cutting off the life of the Indian who is the life and light of India from the Indian people, putting in place long time agents of British intelligence and the C.I.A. such as the Nehru family and Vajpayee instead, C.I.A.-RAW have ensured the decay and death of the Indian nation. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi (above) can change this situation and bring India back to life. But India's missile men have not the life to do this.

JUNE 18, 2010: Just in the matter of Bhopal, in any country with a spark of life the Nehru family and government ministers would have been lynched long ago.
I said "Just in the matter of Bhopal" because the Bhopal matter is publicly known and cannot be covered up. In the case of infinitely greater injury to India which requires destroying the United States from coast to coast, the media themselves are covering it up in collusion with the government.

JUNE 19, 2010: A story dated June 18, 2010 on IBN Live is headed "Past Panels on Bhopal a Trail of Broken Promises". I wrote on June 14, 2010 above "I have promises to keep ... So now my focus is on those ten thousand thermonuclear warheads India has to produce ...". This requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. A PTI report dated June 17, 2010 from Washington says "US Working Out New India Specific Export Control Regime: Anticipating a wider cooperation with India on Space and Defense, US is working out a new India specific export control regime to ease restrictions on export of hi-tech equipment" and "Blake said ... "we think that there are enormous opportunities for American companies to do more and work more with their colleagues in the space area and also in the defense area"...". From an emphasis on self-reliance, all strategic areas -- nuclear, space and defense -- are rapidly being brought into dependence on and control of the United States, with imports replacing indigenous research, development and production. Is the cover up of the case of infinitely greater injury to India which requires destroying the United States from coast to coast being lifted? No. It will only be lifted with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. After the first meeting of the Group of Ministers on Bhopal on June 18, 2010, its head said "We will give our best and most sympathetic consideration to these people who have suffered as a result of this tragedy". This is the attitude of the American chairman of Union Carbide. He deserves to be killed along with the Americans and all the American servants in New Delhi. I have shown how India can very quickly be number one both economically and in defense. This is the promise I have to keep. Absolutely no one in India has a millionth part of the ability of the undersigned to do this. The cover up is responsible for the decay and death of the Indian nation I have referred to above. It has required hundreds of millions of dollars per year for the past 33 years in continuous satellite surveillance and 'neutralization' of the undersigned because the American enemy understands that keeping the undersigned out of India and the consciousness of Indians is the key to keeping India down. It has required control over the Indian media -- which is control over Indians' consciousness. It has required sending India's members of parliament and civil servants to be "trained" in American universities, making the colonial relationship formal and normal. It has required unimaginable crimes against India's and the world's greatest scientist, stealing his work while committing crimes against him unprecedented in the history of mankind. But they have not been able to douse the life and light of India, just cut it off from the Indian people. The decay and death of the Indian nation, now well advanced and seen in the Bhopal matter, is genocide, extermination of India's population. I have said what will be done to destroy the United States from coast to coast and exterminate its entire population. No one in India has the ability to think of this or bring it about. But this is what justice requires and this is what will be done. All the others have to do is obey India's legitimate ruler because they neither have the knowledge, nor intelligence nor courage nor character to do anything on their own. With nuclear weapons, a very few people can bring this about, that is, a very few people need to obey. I have said who those people are.
Along with cutting off the undersigned from the consciousness of the Indian people, the C.I.A.-RAW controlled media keep the Nehru family, designated by British intelligence and later by the C.I.A. to be ruler of India, in the public consciousness at all times. Compare the security given to them to the security given to the greatest living Indian and the only Indian who takes national security seriously. The Home Minister is responsible for providing security. What is he doing to provide security to the undersigned?
If the Law Ministry has recommended seeking extradition of Warren Anderson again, it is meaningless unless it is backed up by an implicit or explicit threat of the use of force by India against the United States because force is the foundation of sovereignty and justice (see above). All those who have undermined India's ability to have nuclear supremacy over the United States -- such as through the nuclear deal -- are complicit in Warren Anderson's flouting of Indian law and must be duly punished; this includes the entire Indian Cabinet.

JUNE 20, 2010: Instead of taking action that will bring results, such as pre-positioning nuclear weapons in U.S. cities, cutting all ties with the United States and preparing to destroy it from coast to coast, Indian nigger slaves go to a stupid and extremely harmful court system imposed on them by the British to introduce decades and decades of delay, uncounted costs, immeasurable injustice and destruction of dharma and society. Economic, technological and military progress that could be accomplished in a couple of years does not get accomplished even in decades and there is backsliding into an overtly colonial relationship as has been occurring for a decade now. This is inevitable because India is ruled by the C.I.A. through RAW and prime ministers and others it directly employs. The litmus test of progress is whether the cover up of the United States' crimes against India which require destroying the United States from coast to coast has been lifted. It is no use waiting for it to happen; it will never happen unless it is brought about by direct action -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. Generals in a war sacrifice tens of thousands, sometimes hundreds of thousands of lives for a larger goal. This will be similar. India's missile men need to observe their dharma and obey India's legitimate ruler, not those appointed by the C.I.A.
Is there a way one can determine that these are not India's legitimate rulers or even defenders? I said below "Start with India's Army Chief and ask "Are you in favour of strategic nuclear parity with, or supremacy over, the United States as a national objective?" If the answer is not 'Yes', he should be shot on the spot. The same for all other generals and admirals, etc. The same for Manmohan Singh and members of his Cabinet. The same for leaders of political parties. The same for journalists writing on the nuclear deal. The same for 'strategic analysts', etc." Are Manmohan Singh and the rest of the Indian government, by their actions such as the nuclear deal, in favor of nuclear supremacy over the United States as a national objective? Do you need to ask? Don't their actions provide a definitive answer?

Indian government ministers going to the United States this week to rub shoulders with U.S. corporate CEOs is reason enough to lynch the former. This is similar to the VVIP send-off given to Warren Anderson. Investment? The Indian government has unlimited investment capital just by printing the money, so long as it is used for productive purposes, as I have shown. Technology? As I have shown, even if foreign technology is offered on a platter and free of charge, it is better for India to reject it and develop technology within India. Besides a tenfold, fifty-fold increase in money and manpower devoted to research and development in government labs, the government could give out, as grants with no repayment needed, two lakh crores, five lakh crores per year to industrial houses for research and development -- just ensuring it is indeed used for research and development. India lacks for neither money nor manpower, just rulers who are not traitors. First and foremost, it requires killing RAW which is a branch of the C.I.A. whose number one mission is sabotaging Indian research and development by various means and keeping India dependent on and under the control of the United States and other white countries. Of the two nuclear bombs I want India's missile men to explode in New Delhi, the first will be on RAW headquarters.
A headline today says "BP [British Petroleum] reportedly to raise $50 billion for spill"; which court judgment mandated British Petroleum to spend $50 billion "to cover the cost of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill"? This is not the "$20 billion fund to compensate victims of the accident" which is eventually expected to reach over $70 billion; which court mandated the $20 billion fund? Just executive actions of the U.S. government. Are Indian government ministers going by the half dozen to the United States to rub shoulders with U.S. corporate CEOs capable of such executive action? Is ANYONE in India capable of such action against whites? Another mission of RAW is to keep Indians subservient and servile to whites, by control of the media, educational dependence and in other ways. Just look at the terminology used in the current coverage of the Bhopal matter; the Indian government will make a fresh "plea" for the extradition of Warren Anderson; do you know the difference between a "plea" and a "demand"? To make a demand, you need the power to apply force, which requires nuclear supremacy for India over the United States because all these issues boil down to the ability to apply force. And this boils down to replacing India's C.I.A.-appointed government with its legitimate ruler. Regarding the Nehru family being the C.I.A.-designated ruler of India, an article in The Pioneer of June 21, 2010 says "In the 1980s, Mrs Gandhi overruled the proposal of HN Sethna, then chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, to ignore US protests and try thorium derivatives in the Tarapur nuclear facility along with spent uranium that would make India independent of imported uranium required as fuel for the atomic power plant" (of course, as I have shown, the situation regarding the import of nuclear fuel and reactors is infinitely more scandalous than what is said in this article) while a blizzard of reports and articles in India's C.I.A.-RAW controlled media has promoted this weekend the half-white member of the Nehru family as India's next ruler. How many reports and articles have you seen about "the most intelligent, most handsome man on Earth whose toe nail clippings are worth more to India and the world than the rest of the billion-plus Indians combined"?

JUNE 21, 2010: Sunk as they are in slavery and slavery-induced stupidity, Indians do not see that what laws are applied and how they are interpreted is determined by the ability to apply force. They are looking for "evidence" against Anderson, but evidence does not matter, only the ability to apply force does. I have shown above how to get Anderson sent back to India, how India can bring the necessary force to bear on the United States. But these buggers are in the employment of the United States.

Being employed by the United States has its rewards. Fifteen hundred crores for Bhopal disaster is about what the Indian government has spent for luxury jets for the white woman, insect Advani and traitor Manmohan Singh. Is it any wonder they are all silent and indifferent to the tiny matter of Bhopal? And a tiny matter it is. Fifteen hundred crores is a tiny fraction of what the Indian government will spend on the unnecessary and harmful import of American C-17 transport aircraft and an even tinier fraction of what it will spend on unnecessary and harmful import of 126 fighter aircraft. It is a tiny fraction of what the ministers who decided on it or who are going to the United States to rub shoulders with American corporate CEOs have collected in kickbacks and bribes from the Americans they represent.

JUNE 22, 2010: For each so-called freedom fighter, there were a hundred Indians employed by the British in both civilian and military jobs. Now the situation is a hundred times worse. It will be hard to find an 'educated', professional or ruling class Indian who does not have close relatives employed by the Americans. Whether it is high level judges, high level military officers, high level politicians or high level civil servants -- all have children employed in the United States. Do you expect these people to work for India or the United States? They all work for the United States. Is it possible for India to have a government that works for India? No. Forget it. It is not possible.

JUNE 23, 2010: Indians need to realize the determining role of force even in economic relations. When insects such as Pranab Mukherjee talk of closer economic relations between India and the United States, they mean making Indians into slave labor for the American consumer as the Chinese have become so that the Americans no longer produce things, the Chinese toil to produce things for them to consume and all the Americans have to do is keep the whip over the Chinese and get the cooperation of China's ruling class by giving employment to their family members in the United States as they do to Indians. This master-slave relationship can be reversed or ended by bringing superior force to bear against the United States. Only I can provide such superior force to India and make India master, rather than slave, of the United States, exercising the power of life and death over the Americans and exterminate them to put an end to this scourge.

India must get rid of 90% of its conventional forces and replace them with nuclear forces. Conventional forces are worthless for destroying the United States. Taking care of the enemy United States will take care of all other enemies. It is not just the production of consumer goods that the United States has transferred to slaves abroad. It is doing so for its fighting and invading as it has transferred its fighting and invading to Pakistan and is on the way to doing so with India. It is not just that all insurgencies and terrorism in India is C.I.A.-sponsored; so is the sea piracy around Somalia etc. which has been used to draw the Indian Navy into serving under the United States and these buggers are only too happy to resume the role they used to play for the British in Mesopotamia and elsewhere in World War I and II, etc.

JUNE 24, 2010: All of the above requires destroying RAW first. India's missile men must break their silence and say whether they are willing to destroy RAW. If not, I will go to the next step -- of destroying India's missile men.

India must demand custody of Warren Anderson simply on the basis of the fact that he has jumped bail and is a proclaimed offender, without going into the merits of the case against him for the Bhopal gas leak. Jumping bail is as much of an offense in the United States as it is in India and cause for arrest and prosecution, regardless of the grounds -- responsibility for the Bhopal gas leak, the resulting deaths, etc. -- on which he was originally arrested and thus meets the terms of the extradition treaty. A demand for his extradition should not refer to his responsibility for the Bhopal gas leak at all; it should only refer to his jumping bail and being a proclaimed offender. All the evidence needed for this is evidence that he has jumped bail, not evidence of his responsibility for the Bhopal gas leak.

A headline said 'Jaswant Singh returns to BJP, thanks Advani'. He should have thanked me instead because it was my reference to "insect Advani" which led to his return. He should explain what he did as Foreign Minister when Bush in the Oval Office spoke to him, referring to me, of "the immense talent of Indians and the immense wealth [they] have given" to the U.S. (letter dated April 13, 2001 in http://www.thecurrentonline.com/2.14134/web-submission-terrorism-1.1969806 ).

Bush's statement implied that there was some sort of a deal between the American and Indian governments regarding me, because both governments knew of and were committing the ongoing crimes against me. Let us hear what the deal was, you piece of dog-faeces! Was the deal that the Indian government will keep quiet about the Americans' crimes against me and actively participate in the crimes in exchange for favors received from the United States? You have to answer this question and do not have the choice to remain silent because the consequences of silence will be a horrible death for you and all the "familiar faces" you are glad to return to -- and a lot, lot worse. The game is up, your deal is up and you better speak up and answer the question. You know about Hiroshima and Nagasaki ; it is going to be a lot, lot worse in New Delhi and you will not escape if you flee New Delhi.

JULY 7, 2010: C.I.A.-RAW carried out the shooting death of Rear Admiral Jamwal, an expert in undersea warfare. But this is hardly new for them; the biggest such operation they have carried out -- which is still in progress -- is the operation against the undersigned which has been in progress for 33 years (see the role of K. Subrahmanyam in this operation in the attachment to this E-Mailed press release). I am India's expert in strategic defence and the father of India's strategic program including the Integrated Guided Missiles Development Program. What will you do to the people who carried out the shooting death of Rear Adm. Jamwal? What will you do to the people who have carried out this operation against me -- more serious a million times than the shooting death of Rear Adm. Jamwal? Who shot Jamwal? You know the Indian participants in the operation against me -- K. Subrahmanyam, Indira and Rajiv Gandhi, Atal Behari Vajpayee and countless others including Jaswant Singh (above), L. K. Advani, etc. RAW, of course. Entire 'Committees of Secretaries' of the Indian government. All of India's media. The Tamil snakes. And countless others. The kingpins are -- K. Subrahmanyam, all of the prime ministers and cabinet ministers referred to above, all the RAW heads and others. Who will arrest them? Their crime/guilt is known to all. The only punishment for it is death. The only way to carry out the punishment is by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. Including the service chiefs, who spend no time on the defence of India. The entire Ministry of Defence which spends no time on the defence of India. All other Government of India ministries. All the presswallahs, who spend no time on informing the Indian public of the most vital matters. All the politicians who spend no time on either the defence or economy or anything else in India's interest. All their servants, hangers-on, associates and associates of associates, the shopkeepers they patronise, the buses and taxis they use, the policemen who protect them -- everyone else who comes in near or distant contact with them, which is everyone in New Delhi. When is the best time to carry out the death sentence on them? NOW is the time, the sooner the better. How to prepare the country for it? There is no need to prepare the country beyond what I have done through these press releases for a long time now. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will hardly make a dent on India. Not to India's economy, not to India's military strength, not to India's population. It will excise this cancer which is New Delhi and enable India to live, survive and thrive. To defend itself, to feed itself, to chart its path forward. The British killed ten million Indians in the ten years following 1857 -- a substantial part of India's much smaller population then. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will kill a much smaller percentage of India's population -- in India's interest, not Britain's. Rear Adm. Jamwal was killed in the United States' interest, the operation against me has been going on in the United States' interest. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi and those living there will be in India's interest. It will be the first time in a long time that any thing in New Delhi will serve India's interests. The bodies of the dead will decay and evaporate quickly enough in the July sun, leaving the landscape covered with bleaching bones. The area can be left alone while the sun does its work on the corpses. India will be ruled from elsewhere and in a different way. The state governments should continue functioning normally so far as possible. Washington, D.C. and New York city should be targeted with two nuclear-tipped missiles, of whatever yield, in case the United States thinks of intervening. The state governments will be funded as I have said below. The same for all other entities funded by the Indian government. They should all continue functioning normally so far as possible. Mass communications outside of New Delhi will remain. Instructions will be sent as and when necessary. The corpse of Delhi will be cremated by the sun. The rest of India will live.

JULY 8, 2010: There is an alternative route to the same goal -- the nuclear destruction of Washington, D.C. and New York city by two nuclear-tipped missiles, of whatever yield. Their destruction should be accompanied by a warning that additional U.S. cities will be similarly destroyed if there is any retaliation. If there IS retaliation, it will hardly hurt India, as I have shown below, but the destruction of the United States will have been accomplished, as I have shown below. I have shown below that even if 95% of India's population is killed by the United States, the remaining population of about 50 million will be comparable to India's population in its golden age and India will not only survive but flourish. But the United States will not survive even two 20 kiloton blasts in Washington and New York city. India will win a nuclear war with the United States no matter what the United States does.

My own preference is for the first alternative.

Let the first alternative above go forward.

Satish Chandra

PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 8, 2008 The Aim of the Nuclear Destruction of New Delhi
A few years ago in a statement to the press saying how Yoga should be the central part of Indian educational curricula and the degree of proficiency in it should be the criterion for hiring and promotion in government jobs for example, how the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the production of food, clothing, etc., are irrelevant for India “because advanced Yoga practitioners who control their breath live on a handful of rice a day and have the bodies of perfect athletes at a very advanced age“, I said ‘Nothing said above frees India from the obligation to dominate, rather than be dominated by, the intellectually and morally inferior ‘mlecchas’ of the West and do whatever is necessary to enslave and, if necessary, exterminate them. And it WILL be necessary’.
This is what India’s nuclear supremacy over the United States is about for which New Delhi/ Delhi has to be destroyed with a nuclear explosion.
Do not for a moment believe the propaganda about equality in the United States. If India is to emerge from slavery, it has to have nuclear supremacy over the United States.
Satish Chandra
PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 7, 2008 Digging Tunnels As Shelters From Nuclear Explosions On India’s Borders, Etc.
1. The following is a post on Pakistan Defence Forum about the Indian army’s plans to dig tunnels on India’s borders with Pakistan and China as shelters from nuclear explosions ( http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence-military/15903-india-considers-tunnel-network-pakistan-china-borders.html ) :
The first overground nuclear explosion in India is going to be one that will destroy New Delhi/ Delhi -- see the first 22 posts, especially the press releases in post numbers 13 through 22 -- in this thread:India Should Supply Arms To Pakistan To Help Defend Its Borders Against U.S. AttacksSo digging tunnels on India's borders is senseless. But then no one can accuse India's army of having any sense.
2. The following is another post on Pakistan Defence Forum
( http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence-military/15785-india-should-supply-arms-pakistan-help-defend-its-borders-against-u-s-attacks-5.html ) :
Satish Chandra's biography is in Marquis' Who's Who in America (2008 and earlier editions) and in Who's Who in the World (2009 edition).There is an expression in Sanskrit "Neti, neti" which means "Not this, not this"; it is applied to God and means that any description of God in particular terms is inadequate/incorrect because no matter how you try to describe Him, God is a lot more than that. Some people (for example, a professor of philosophy at a United States university) have suggested that Satish Chandra is an incarnation of God ("avatar"). He is India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, but he is unknown to the Indian public, for reasons of the kind that are indicated in posts number 21 and 22 of this thread. He has been responsible for India's nuclear weapons and strategic program -- it was a letter of his to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December '82 which resulted in the start of India's Integrated Guided Missiles Program and the Center for Advanced Technology, for example -- but his theory of money was responsible for the "New Economy" that U.S. president Clinton celebrated which, as Clinton's successor Bush told India's Jaswant Singh later on, has brought immense wealth to the United States (see How India's Economy Can Grow 30% Per year Or More ). He is an engineer, a behavior scientist and a lot more; he has more higher education than anyone he knew on the Harvard University faculty (see his web page: Psychotherapy - eBoard ); he is also listed in Who's Who in Science and Engineering and Who's Who in Medicine and Healthcare. As is stated in post # 1 of this thread, he has been the only threat to the continuance of firangi rule over India. He is generally acknowledged to be the most patriotic Indian alive but, as can be seen in the posts at the beginning of this thread, he is going to destroy New Delhi/Delhi with a nuclear explosion ("Neti, neti"). When, after the 1998 nuclear tests by India, Satish Chandra expressed doubts about the loyalty and trustworthiness of Vajpayee, who was prime minister, the control of India's nuclear weapons was taken away from Vajpayee and given to India's president, Narayanan. When prime minister, Vajpayee often referred to Satish Chandra simply as "Pakistan". When Benazir Bhutto was prime minister, she referred to the "game plan being hatched by extra-constitutional forces [meaning Satish Chandra] to come to power [in Pakistan]". When Gen. Musharraf assumed office after his coup, Satish Chandra, in a letter to the press, commented on it and Gen. Musharraf went on television just to say "Let no external forces think that they can take advantage of the prevailing situation". The best way to know about him is to read his blog: Nuclear Supremacy for India over U.S. in its entirety.By the way, Satish Chandra has said that India's RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A. and has been responsible for almost all of the terrorism in India since 1983; see the thread by Ali.009 in this forum -- What Satish Chnadra wants you to know about India RAW -- and RAW sends its operatives to post a lot of abuse of Satish Chandra on forums like this.
3. The following is an excerpt from another post on Pakistan Defence Forum ( http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence-military/13397-russian-made-akula-nuclear-sub-set-join-indian-navy-india-rushes-star-2.html ) :
The following are some of Satish Chandra's other comments about India's weapons development program (Satish Chandra is the father of India's strategic weapons program; India's Integrated Guided Missiles Program and the Center for Advanced Technology, for example, were started as a result of a letter of his to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December, 1982). Whatever is said below about the intellectual capabilities of Indians also applies to Pakistanis. :-
4. The following are posts on Pakistan Defence Forum in a thread about Pakistan warning the United States against missile strikes on its territory ( http://www.defence.pk/forums/strategic-geopolitical-issues/15883-pakistan-warns-us-over-missiles.html ) :
i) This is not a warning; it is more like pleading or begging. Indians have a similar master-slave relationship with the United States. There IS another way:-How Pakistan Can Quickly Become A Superpower & Obliterate The U.S. AttackerSatish Chandra has written:"Indians as a rule are inferior Indian niggers unfit to talk about strategic matters, especially when it involves the White Master in any way, which it always does. That is why in his only reference to India in his 'Mein Kampf', Adolf Hitler said "As for India, I would rather see India under the British than under any one else". It is not just that a handful of the British from half way around the world ruled India for centuries; a lot of other people did that from various countries for a thousand years.A modern day Babar will start each day by killing a million Indians before breakfast every morning, though some think three million will be better (this number can be herded into fairly small extermination circles and then a neutron bomb exploded over them).I am an Indian, but as far above the other Indians as an avatar is above ordinary mortals."It must be remembered that the Muslims of the subcontinent are by and large converted Hindus, converted by militarily stronger invaders and, therefore, Pakistanis share many of the characteristics of Indians and Pakistan's relationship to the United States is similar to that of India.
ii) Satish Chandra has written:"How did this slavery to the white man come about? An answer is in The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh): "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:..." Present day Indians’ behaviour is profoundly affected by the terrorization and subjugation inflicted on them by the British. This came on top of the terrorization and subjugation inflicted by Muslim invaders in the preceding 800 years. Since Muslims are no longer strong, Indians are coming out of fear of the Muslims but the fear of the white man keeps getting deeper and deeper as the white man’s power in relation to Indians keeps increasing. India is faced with an even deeper slavery to the Americans with the nuclear deal and all the other prongs it comes with. Attaining strategic nuclear parity, then supremacy and using this supremacy to eliminate this incomparably greater threat, will be India's real War of Independence. One does not need to refer to the holocaust beginning 1857 to know the incomparably greater American threat and its consequences, which I know directly but which remains a secret from the Indian people."Satish Chandra has shown how India will get out of slavery to the firangis; see the first 22 posts, especially the press releases in post numbers 13 through 22, of this thread:India Should Supply Arms To Pakistan To Help Defend Its Borders Against U.S. AttacksAs you can see, it requires the destruction of New Delhi/Delhi by a nuclear explosion but it will liberate the subcontinent as a whole from slavery to the firangis.For the full picture of how the liberation of India and the rest of the subcontinent from slavery to the firangis will occur, go to:Nuclear Supremacy for India over U.S.
　
PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 6. 2008 The Dow Reflects the True Feelings of Americans About Obama
This press release should be read in conjunction with the press release dated September 20, 2008 below.
The Dow Jones stock market index reflects the true feelings of Americans about Obama. All the while it looked that Obama will win the election, the Dow Jones index has been plunging. After centuries of enslavement, white Americans are willing to be ‘nice’ to blacks and the lessening of overt aggression toward blacks in recent years has been accompanied by a greatly increased aggressiveness toward brown people. But making a black their president depresses them. Aggression is a basic motivator and in the language of feelings it is reflected in ‘race pride’, ‘positive self image’, etc. Depression occurs when aggression that would normally be directed outward is directed inwards because something has evoked aggression that is unacceptably strong; having a black as president evokes such strong aggression. Being ‘nice’ to blacks -- in the months preceding the elections, I observed numerous instances of whites, young and old, male and female, going out of their way to treat blacks near them in the subway as equals, conspicuously initiating ‘social’ chit-chat with them, yielding seats to much younger black women, etc. -- involves such redirection of aggression inwards which is characteristic of depression and this is reflected in the depressed stock market.
In an article that appeared in Kashmir Times in 1996-97 and in other articles, letters to the press, etc., I have said how India’s economic and technological state is a consequence of managing aggression in ways that have become dysfunctional and given solutions; for example, in
i) article below “Nuclear Deal -- An Invasion of India in Progress” which says “A single-minded pursuit of strategic nuclear supremacy will revitalise the nation as nothing else can and inaugurate a new chapter in the nation’s and the world’s history”;
ii) addendum from August 4 ‘07 to December 6 ‘07 below which says: “A national objective of strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States will be a motivator like nothing else can; it will transform India’s psychology and produce economic prosperity also as nothing else can, with an application of my proposal about money utilising the unlimited amount of capital at the government’s disposal. A national objective of strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States will make crystal clear what India must do in all areas of domestic and foreign policy and put an end to present day policies and problems which have their roots in a slave mentality. All this is already implicit in Article 51 of the Constitution…”.
In the press releases below, I have said that argument is of no avail with the deeply enslaved Indians and obstacles to the realisation of the above objective will be removed by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/Delhi.
Satish Chandra (http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com )
PRESS RELEASE OCTOBER 26, 2008 ISRO Should Continue With The Moon Mission Normally Regardless Of The Nuclear Destruction Of New Delhi/ Delhi
The answer to the question below (“Why Are American Companies Providing India’s Satellite Navigation System -- Gagan?” ) is, of course, that such dependence and vulnerability is precisely the aim of India’s real ‘government’, RAW, which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. RAW itself sits at C.I.A.-supplied terminals to participate in crimes against the only Indian who has been a threat to the continuance of firangi rule over India as do some cabinet ministers ( addendum of January 10 ‘08 below), media people, etc. Most politicians in India’s so-called parliament have fled New Delhi to escape the nuclear explosion but it does not matter who flees and who remains.
ISRO should continue with the moon mission normally regardless of the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi.
PRESS RELEASE OCTOBER 24, 2008 Why Are American Companies Providing India’s Satellite Navigation System -- Gagan?
The following are my posts today on Indian Defence Forum:-
(Satish Chandra) Why are American companies providing India's satellite navigation system -- Gagan? This is at least as perilous as the Sankhya Vahini which was scrapped on national security grounds. This deserves a swift death -- not the project but getting it from American companies.http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/3636129.cms
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Reply from ajay_ijn) GAGAN is an Augmentation system to be specific, it corrects GPS Signal and makes it more accurate. Electronic Industry is just non-existant in India, there would have been no other option for ISRO. Raytheon already has experience to implement them in US, So they are the best candidate. This is a system aimed an civil aviation, one doesn't know its strategic potential.Raytheon is only providing ground equipment. ISRO will test Gagan signals by leasing an Inmarsat Satellite and will deploy full fledged system on a GSAT Satellite. It was to be launched by now, but probably ISRO was busy Chandrayaan.ISRO has another, its own Navigation System Project where IRNSS, group of 7 Satellites which can provide Navigation services within South Asia. PSLV is slated to launch to those satellites from 2009.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Satish Chandra) In importing ANY electronic equipment from the United States, the following must be kept in mind [these are two excerpts from my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' : http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com/ ] :-"ADDED ON FEBRUARY 26, 2006: National security crisis due to microwaves from satellites: I. Microwaves from satellites can be used not just for audio and video surveillance (see addendum dated February 10, 2006 to letter dated May 11, 2005, above). Three days ago, I had put my computer to sleep when I went to sleep. As I approached my work table on getting up a few hours later, the computer switched on without my doing it ; the C.I.A. had switched it on remotely by microwaves hoping I will continue something I was doing on the computer before I went to sleep and this occurred several more times. In the past, when I was doing something, such as preparing one of these letters to the press, on my computer, the screen would suddenly be replaced with, say, a Google search box without my doing anything and it appeared the C.I.A. was remotely controlling my computer over the Internet, but its switching on without being connected to the Internet or the telephone line showed the control was by microwaves. Even signals over the telephone lines usually travel, at least part of the way, over microwaves. This shows that the C.I.A. can control any digital equipment, not just computers, by microwaves from satellites. This applies to all digital equipment, such as that used in a multitude of defence applications, electric power grids, nuclear power plants, etc., even if the equipment is not connected to the outside world by telephone lines. This means that all digital equipment should be shielded so it cannot be operated by microwaves from satellites. The turning on and off of a television set, changing its channels, etc., by a remote is done similarly though TV remotes use infra-red rays instead of microwaves. In a letter to the press several years ago, I also mentioned that the C.I.A. was able to remotely monitor what was being typed on an old-fashioned electric typewriter.""(March 23 ‘08) India’s nuclear supremacy and microwaves from satellites:In a letter to the press a few years ago, I referred to Indians’ lack of appreciation of the importance of research and of scientists and gave an example of the Japanese in World War II thinking they had equaled the Americans in aircraft carriers, fighter planes and the rest and the Americans then came out with the atom bomb. In my addendum dated February 26, 2006, titled “National security crisis due to microwaves from satellites” below I described the threat to national security from microwaves from satellites. On the Bharat Rakshak online forum, an American who seems a C.I.A. specialist on India is asking that India acquiesce in a United States’ invasion and permanent occupation of Pakistan (and later of India). He says “even at the moment for example … Pakistan’s air-defenses have been electronically neutralized to allow the ingress of predator drones” and that “the USA has already electronically neutralized the Pakistani nuclear capabilities. The weapons are also dispersed in bits and pieces with no possibility of ever putting even one of these together. Doing so would invite a massive conventional or nuclear response from the USA. Only taking physical control and destruction of these weapons remains which should pose no major problems as the Pakistan armed forces are fully co-operative”. The electronic neutralisation of Pakistan’s air defences and nuclear weapons has almost certainly been done by microwaves from satellites as I said in the addendum dated February 26 ‘06 below can be done. India’s missiles and nuclear weapons can presumably be similarly disabled by microwaves from satellites but shielding them and other equipment from microwaves from satellites can easily be done with metal foil; communication links for missiles and other equipment may have to be redesigned so they work despite the shielding. DRDO should continue, taking control of the Indian government, toward nuclear supremacy over the United States described below."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Reply from phanijaladi) AOA,IS IDF [Indian Defence Forum] looking like a bunch of toddlers?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESS RELEASE OCTOBER 11, 2008 After the Nuclear Destruction of New Delhi and Before the New Government of India in Hyderabad Begins Functioning
After the nuclear destruction of New Delhi, till India’s new government in Hyderabad starts functioning, questions and enquiries from the state governments and other entities should be sent to me by E-Mail at : satchandra24 at hotmail dot com .
Those who would like to leave the New Delhi/Delhi area are free to do so; as I have said, the nuclear explosion will be just as effective in destroying firangi rule over India even if the entire population and all politicians, civil servants, military, the media, etc., leave New Delhi/Delhi before the explosion. However, the nuclear explosion will not wait for them to leave.
Beyond the nuclear destruction of New Delhi lies the economic prosperity and military supremacy of India and the nuclear destruction of the United States. There are costs -- time is the most important -- and no advantage in waiting for anything.
PRESS RELEASE OCTOBER 2, 2008 Timing of the Nuclear Destruction of New Delhi/Delhi
The government offices are closed today but the timing of the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/Delhi, which will aim to kill the maximum number of traitors in the RAW headquarters and other government complexes as well as outside and will best be done when they are in their offices during working hours on a working day, will be determined by convenience and no day or time is ruled out.
PRESS RELEASE OCTOBER 1, 2008 Instructions to State Governments and Other Entities Regarding the Impending Nuclear Destruction of New Delhi/Delhi
As I have said, after the nuclear blast in New Delhi, the dead will be left to leave the ground of the capital region covered with bleaching bones. Those who are far away from ground zero and survive will flee to the surrounding areas in Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab and Rajasthan. There is not much the governments of these states can do to prepare themselves for the influx except be aware that it is going to occur and tell the people of their states to expect it. All state governments should know that, after the destruction of New Delhi/Delhi, India’s government will be in Hyderabad and its contact number will be the telephone number of DRDO in Hyderabad; further instructions will be provided by E-mail after the destruction of New Delhi. They will be funded by the new Indian government in accordance with my proposal about money; in the period immediately after the destruction of New Delhi, they should continue their normal functions so far as possible. The same for other entities that are part of or supported by the Central government. To avoid panic, the state governments should inform their personnel and the people of their states of the impending destruction of New Delhi/Delhi or face the consequences of not doing so.
PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 27, 2008 Source of Manmohan Singh’s ‘Deep Love’ For Bush
Indian politicians have condemned Manmohan Singh’s telling Bush that the people of India “deeply love” him. They should see the source of Indians’ love for the white man as I explained below many months ago:-
“There is a basic difference between the treason of Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee and that of Manmohan Singh. The holocaust after 1857 in which the British killed ten million Indians in the first decade to terrorize and subdue them was in large part committed with the help of Sikhs. This terrorization and subduing continued right up to the end of direct British rule, exemplified by the Sikh soldier, riding in a jeep with the British viceroy, cutting down with his submachine gun any Indian, man woman or child, that came in view on either side of the road. The role of the Sikhs, who were originally founded to save India from foreign invaders -- the invaders were then Muslims -- reversed from 1857 on and they became a principal instrument of the British terrorization and subjugation of India. The Sikhs know how successful this terrorization and subjugation was -- it is this terrorization and subjugation because of which Indians today dare not even mention nuclear supremacy for India much less demand it -- and their role in it determines their attitude toward whites and toward Indians. This is why Manmohan Singh considers himself answerable to no one except Bush and the white man as he imposes the terrorization and subjugation of the nuclear deal on India, makes no attempt to hide his loyalty to the white man and shows open contempt for Indians…. Like Manmohan Singh and others praising British rule over India (he did that when receiving an honorary doctorate from Cambridge University; he was prime minister of India at the time), there are many Indians who praise American rule over India. Like the many Indians loyal to Queen Victoria, there are many Indians loyal to the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India [she was treated as the empress of India even before she held any party or government post and all visiting heads of state were required to call on her at her residence; this was so even during BJP governments at the Center]. … In war, officers are under orders to execute on the spot any soldiers who are too terrorized to fight or obey orders to advance on enemy positions. … The terrorization and subjugation Indians have undergone at the hands of the British is responsible for Indians refusing to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy over the United States. It is necessary to execute -- machine gun and bulldoze into trenches -- at least a few thousand such Indians, who are in key positions -- such as RAW employees, politicians and media people -- to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy (they may be terrorized or bought up or both though being bought up is greatly facilitated by being terrorized; the terror, when long standing, is usually repressed meaning unconscious and being subjugated often involves both terror and carrot but terror is the foundation of the treason of RAW employees and people such as Vajpayee and Mani Shankar Aiyar though all they may feel is love and loyalty for the white man; terror facilitates such love [emphasis added]; a former head of RAW, Vikram Sood, in a column in Hindustan Times, repeatedly quoted the white/Christian head of the missionary school he attended as the fount of all wisdom on various issues and referred to Indians as worshippers of snakes and monkeys on a Times of India blog -- I have referred in a letter below to RAW arranging for practitioners of an Indian discipline, whose understanding of gravity and inertia I called superior to that of Albert Einstein, to be physically attacked and driven away in Noida and Madhya Pradesh on the C.I.A.'s orders -- but such behavior of RAW employees, the behavior of desi people like Laloo Yadav and even thoroughly devout and traditional Indians and of all Indians in everyone's household, neighbourhood and community is profoundly determined by the terrorization and subjugation the British inflicted on Indians and this terrorization and subjugation is responsible for the fact that no Indian dares to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy for India …), for India’s nuclear supremacy to go forward.”
Since I wrote the above, I have said that, instead of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches, Indians in a position to obstruct India’s nuclear supremacy over the most powerful white country will be destroyed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 25, 2008 Time To Destroy New Delhi
The time for the nuclear destruction of New Delhi has arrived.
(Expanded) PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 C.I.A.-RAW Terrorism In India And Elsewhere And C.I.A.’s Subversion & Control Of Governments In Various Countries
From my direct knowledge of RAW and the C.I.A. whose target I have been for over 31 years, I have been saying for years that almost all terrorist incidents in India since 1983 have been carried out by RAW which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. I have also written below about the C.I.A.’s control of India’s and Russia’s governments (see addendum dated September 10, 2008 below), including Russia's intelligence agencies. I wrote, when Yeltsin was president, that the bombing of apartment buildings in Moscow which killed hundreds was carried out by Russian intelligence agencies and chided the Russian government for imitating India's RAW. Beslan residents and former Russian intelligence officers with direct knowledge have been vehement that the Beslan massacre was carried out by Russian intelligence agencies, as many massacres in India have been carried out by RAW. I find that something similar to what I have been saying is being said by others (see I. and II. below in this press release) though their knowledge is not direct like mine.
The nuclear explosion in New Delhi, centered on RAW headquarters, will put an end to C.I.A.’s rule over India, of which terrorism is only a small part (see my press release dated August 26, 2008 titled “What You Should Know About RAW“ below). It is no use chasing individual groups, controlled by the C.I.A. directly or through RAW and other intelligence agencies in the region, intercepting their communications, etc. The problem of C.I.A. rule will only be solved with the destruction of RAW and then only temporarily. Firangi rule over India is much larger than terrorism and requires the destruction not just of RAW headquarters (which, in principle, could be done by conventional means) but a lot of the rest of New Delhi as well, so that the main government complexes are destroyed and this requires a nuclear explosion. The politicians, the civil servants, the military brass, the media, etc. have to be destroyed simultaneously and left to leave the ground of the capital region covered with bleaching bones. Just as a critical mass of fissile material has to be brought together for a nuclear explosion to occur, a critical amount of destruction of traitors in these various categories has to occur to enable the opening of the floodgates of economic prosperity for India and its nuclear supremacy over and destruction of the United States that will solve the problem of firangi rule over India permanently.
I. (From http://gideon.sulekha.com/blog/post/2008/09/us-embassy-marines-linked-to-islamabad-marriott.htm ) US Embassy & Marines linked to Islamabad Marriott Hotel Atrocity - US state terrorism in India and Pakistan?
Buzz up! ShareThisSep 21 2008 Views 88 Comments (0) Leave a Comment Tags: india pakistan us israel apartheid israel uk iraq afghanistan cia mossad terrorism Delhi Serial Blasts ...more on Delhi Serial Blasts
The leading Pakistani newspaper the Pakistan Daily has reported evidence of a US involvement in the Marriott Hotel bombing atrocity in Islamabad (see “What was mysterious activity going on in the Marriott Hotel Islamabad by US Marines?”: http://www.daily.pk/politics/politicalnews/7422-what-was-mysterious-activity-going-on-in-the-marriott-hotel-islamabad-by-united-states-marines.html ).
In short, according to this report, a key eyewitness, “member of parliament Mumtaz Alam who belongs to the PPP, the ruling party was there eye [and] witnessed the whole scene when the white truck of US embassy came to the gate of Marriot Hotel and US marines themselves unloaded the steel boxes from the trucks and shifted them to the fourth and fifth floors without passing through them the scanners at the entrance of the hotels. When the truck was there, all the entrance and the exit passage way to the hotels were closed. And now this blast has occurred at the Marriott, while that mysterious activity was going on.”
US state terrorism is as American as apple pie from South America, Central America, the Caribbean, Africa and the Middle East from Occupied Palestine to US-invaded and bombed Pakistan (the first Anglo soldiers on the ground in the former British Raj since 1947 are US soldiers currently invading the Pakistani North West Frontier Provinces of Waziristan despite the protests of the first democratically-elected Pakistani Government in 10 years - the first Anglo troops on the ground in former British India since 1947).
For early US state terrorism from an eye witness insider, read Agee, P. (1975), Inside the Company. CIA Diary (Penguin, London) in which former CIA operative Philip Agee describes how his colleagues went around bombing Catholic Churches in Ecuador with the successful outcome that "communists" and "Socialists" would be blamed for the atrocities.
Of course US state terrorism is very likely to have been involved together with Zionist Israeli state terrorism in the 9-11 atrocity (see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/18569/26/ , Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga: US CIA & Israeli Mossad did 9-11 ) .
Simple cause and effect tells us that US state terrorism is unquestionably involved in the post-9-11 carnage in Occupied Iraq (2 million post-invasion excess deaths, 6 million refugees) and Occupied Afghanistan (4-6 million post-invasion excess deaths, 4 million refugees) (see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/25184/42/ , “9-11 Excuse for US Global Genocide. The real 9-11 atrocity: 9-11 Million Dead in Bush Wars”).
The role of US state terrorism and US-backed Apartheid Israeli state terrorism in violent overt and covert acts around the world is well attested from the US death squads in Latin America, Israeli and US involvement in the Genocide of Guatemalan Indians (the Guatemalan Mayan Indian Genocide that involved 0.1 million dead, one million in internal exile and 1.9 million 1960-1996 violent and non-violent excess deaths; see “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950” (G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007: http://mwcnews.net/Gideon-Polya and http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/ and http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Middle_East/Israel_Guatemala.html ) to the killing fields of the New American Empire that stretches from Occupied Haiti to Occupied Somalia and thence from Occupied Palestine, Occupied Syria, Occupied Diego Garcia, Occupied Iraq, Occupied Afghanistan and NOW US-bombed and US invaded Waziristan in now-democratic Pakistan.
The 1950-2005 excess deaths (avoidable deaths, deaths that did not have to happen) in countries occupied for some time by the US in the post-1945 era totals 82 million – and due to horrendous post-invasion excess deaths in the ongoing Palestinian Genocide (0.3 million), Iraqi Genocide (2 million) and Afghan Genocide (4-6 million) the death toll from US state terrorism and US-backed Apartheid Israeli state terrorism is steadily increasing.
The country-by-country breakdown of 1950-2005 excess deaths/2005 population ratio in the US and in post-1945 US-occupied countries (excluding Germany and Japan) is as follows (m = million; * indicates another major Occupier): US [8.455m/300.038m = 2.8%] - Afghanistan* [16.609m/25.971m = 64.0%], Cambodia* [5.852m/14.825m = 39.5%], Dominican Republic [0.806m/8.998m = 9.0%], Federated States of Micronesia [0.016m/0.111m = 14.4%], Greece* [0.027m/10.978m = 0.2%], Grenada* [0.018m/0.121m = 14.9%], Guam [0.005m/0.168m = 3.0%], Haiti* [4.089m/8.549m = 47.9%], Iraq* [5.283m/26.555m = 19.9%], Korea* [7.958m/71.058m = 11.2%], Laos* [2.653m/5.918m = 44.8%], Panama [0.172m/3.235m = 5.3%], Philippines [9.080m/82.809m = 11.0%], Puerto Rico [0.039m/3.915m = 1.0%], Somalia* [5.568m/10.742m = 51.8%], US Virgin Islands [0.003m/0.113m = 2.4%], Vietnam* [24.015m/83.585m = 28.7%], total = 82.193m/357.651m = 23.0% (for detailed tables and quantitative details of the carnage from US state terrorism, UK state terrorism and US-backed Apartheid Israeli state terrorism see: http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/2008/08/body-count-global-avoidable-mortality.html ) .
Indians faced with this evidence of horrendous US state terrorism should seriously consider Means, Opportunity and Motive (MOM) in the recent bombing atrocities in India – and finger points compellingly at US state terrorism and US-backed Israeli state terrorism. The only beneficiaries from these atocites are Bush America and Apartheid Israel and the close ties of the US Government and CIA with both the Indian and Pakistani Governments and Security gives them a carte blanche to commit terrorist acts in the sub-continent – just as they had carte blanche to bomb Catholic churches in Ecuador in the 1970s.Peace is the only way. Sanctions and Boycotts - successful against US-, UK- and Apartheid Israel--backed, anti-Indian, anti-Asian, racist Apartheid South Africa - are the way ahead to protect India , Pakistan and the world from US state terrorism, US-backed Israeli state terrorism and UK state terrorism.
II. (From http://www.daily.pk/politics/politicalnews/7422-what-was-mysterious-activity-going-on-in-the-marriott-hotel-islamabad-by-united-states-marines.html ) Alex Jones September 21, 2008 Votes: +5
Below is documentation of the usa system of destroying governments-- even"friendly" govenments--which has operated for 200 YEARS-- In fact it is the "friendly" governments that are easiest to destroy because they stupidly welcome the usa destroyers into their lands. http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/gladio.html http://italy.indymedia.org/news/2004/01/473314.php?home=1 http://www.isn.ethz.ch/php/collections/coll_gladio.htm http://www.danieleganser.ch/zeitungsartikel/pdf/Ganser_ISN_Gladio_Security_Watch_15.12.04.pdf http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m14342 http://www.911blogger.com/node/2582 http://www.911blogger.com/node/3639 http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/270906jesseventura.htm http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/secret_warfare_and_natos_stay_behind_armies.htm http://www.isn.ethz.ch/PHP/COLLECTIONS/COLL_GLADIO.HTM http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/09/346111.shtml http://italy.indymedia.org/news/2004/01/473314.php?theme=1 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/138861 http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=32 http://www.rense.com/general74/edge.htm http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/11/99655.php http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/107756.php http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/121206falseflag.htm http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/104955 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/111171
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Alex Jones September 21, 2008 Votes: +4
Below is documentation of the usa system of destroying governments-- even"friendly" govenments--which has operated for 200 YEARS-- In fact it is the "friendly" governments that are easiest to destroy because they stupidly welcome the usa destroyers into their lands. http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/gladio.html http://italy.indymedia.org/news/2004/01/473314.php?home=1 http://www.isn.ethz.ch/php/collections/coll_gladio.htm http://www.danieleganser.ch/zeitungsartikel/pdf/Ganser_ISN_Gladio_Security_Watch_15.12.04.pdf http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m14342 http://www.911blogger.com/node/2582 http://www.911blogger.com/node/3639 http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/270906jesseventura.htm http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/secret_warfare_and_natos_stay_behind_armies.htm http://www.isn.ethz.ch/PHP/COLLECTIONS/COLL_GLADIO.HTM http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/09/346111.shtml http://italy.indymedia.org/news/2004/01/473314.php?theme=1 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/138861 http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=32 http://www.rense.com/general74/edge.htm http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/11/99655.php http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/107756.php http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/121206falseflag.htm http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/104955 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/111171 http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=525539&category=OPINION&newsdate=10/15/2006 http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/khou041202_jt_defenders.184ee72.html http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/11/06/secret_existence.php and Destabilisation is the name of the game http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m42274 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=42352 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=42302 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=42286 http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4443788&page=1 http://winterpatriot.blogspot.com/2008/03/sermon-obama-repudiated-was-one-we-all.html http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=42369 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=42076 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/160043 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/160072 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=42361 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=4207 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=42077 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=42383 http://paktribune.com/news/index.php?id=186675 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/160162 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=42402 http://www.thecatsdream.com/blog/2008/03/what-independent-says-and-what-it-omits.htm http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=42425 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=42422 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/160098 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/160382 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=39696 http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=32310 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17865.htm http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=28977 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/125317 http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/02/false-flags-in-america.html http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/125137 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/148368 http://www.rense.com/general77/fer.htm http://www.uruknet.de/?colonna=m&p=32616 http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/156255 http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/02/declassified-memo-au.html http://www.boingboing.net/2004/07/15/hersh-children-raped.html http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/290906sexuallytorture.htm
PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 20, 2008 A Negro for President?
The following is a post I made on craigslist, Boston :-
A Negro for President?
Reply to: see below Date: 2008-09-20, 7:13PM EDT
You’ve got to be kidding. (AP)"Poll: Racial views steer some away from Obama One-third of polled white Democrats harbor negative views toward blacks" I am told I am handsome (my photograph is at http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com ) and a genius. Because of my achievements as a scientist (I can reasonably claim to be the foremost scientist in the world in my field), I am listed in Who's Who in America (2008 and earlier editions) where I have lived for 42 years and in Who's Who in the World (2009 edition). But I have to live in a tiny room in the ghetto with poor blacks which is a lot better than having to live, as I did, in a Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) library for six and a half months sleeping on the chairs at night and going without food for up to 3 weeks at a time (in principle, I am a multimillionaire in India, even in dollar terms) after having been mugged in a Harvard seminar because my work had put me in a position of leadership in my field. All because of my race (I was told I was "colored", never mind if technically a Caucasian).
A Negro was made Chief of the Army Staff before the first invasion of Iraq because, just as policemen who are low caste Hindus are the most aggressive toward Muslims in India, blacks in America are the most aggressive toward brown people. Obama has already promised to "invade" Pakistan. If he becomes president, God help the world, including America.
　
(Expanded) PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 19, 2008 The Nuclear Destruction Of New Delhi Remains Imperative
Following what was said in the press release dated September 16, 2008 below, the United States has backtracked and, in the opening statement at a U.S. Senate committee’s hearing on the nuclear deal, a U.S. senator (Lugar) said that the U.S. president has certified that India has completed the formalities required for the IAEA agreement “prior to signature”. Similar backtracking may have occurred regarding the MTCR. But the basic problem remains. As I said in the press release of September 8-13, 2008 below “the United States cannot be deterred, only destroyed and nuclear supremacy requires a minimum of ten thousand nuclear warheads. To get the fissile material for these, all of India’s reactors will be run in the military mode. No IAEA safeguards will be allowed on any reactors or anywhere else. No light water reactors will be imported. No nuclear technology needs to be imported and none will be. Nuclear warheads will be tested to their full yields and missiles to their full ranges. .. For India, this is a life and death issue which subsumes within it all other issues, whether of security or prosperity.” Solving the basic problem requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi.
An important marker of where things stand is whether the media are carrying what is being said in these press releases. They are not. That means nothing has changed.
PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 The Time To Destroy The Traitors In New Delhi Is NOW
According to press reports
i) The United States president has ‘certified’ to the U.S. Congress that India has completed all the formalities regarding the IAEA agreement; earlier reports had said that India will sign the IAEA agreement only after the 123 agreement is formally signed;
ii) India has given its formal adherence to the Missile Technology Control regime (PTI report of Jaswant Singh’s statement in The Pioneer, September 17, 2008, Internet) :
" Manmohan Singh has crippled India’s missile development programme by committing to the Missile technology Control Regime (MTCR) in two letters to U.S. President Bush early last week… Bush has recently informed the US Congress of India's formal commitment to the MTCR. This was done by the (Indian) Ministry of External Affairs in separate letters on September 8 and 9, 2008. … the MTCR made it mandatory upon its adherents to restrict the development of missiles, complete rocket systems, unmanned air vehicles and related technologies and that the regime limits payloads to 500 kg and range to just 300 km.”
The time to destroy the traitors in New Delhi is NOW.
(Expanded) PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 14, 2008 India Should Supply Arms To Pakistan To Help Defend Its Borders Against Attacks By The United States
India should supply arms to Pakistan to help defend its borders against attacks by the United States which, as I have said, are attacks on India. This should include the entire range of armaments -- ground, air and naval -- as well as nuclear arms. If Iran is willing to host Indian nuclear armed missiles to defend the region, including Pakistan, from the United States, India should deploy them in Iran also. The same for other countries in the region, such as Syria. As I have said, an occupation of Afghanistan by the firangis is occupation of India. India must act to militarily eject the firangis from Afghanistan without delay. I wrote a decade ago that it is India’s responsibility to eject the United States from the Middle East.
All this requires destroying the traitors in New Delhi first and it is time to do so.
As I have said, the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will open the flood gates to both economic prosperity for India and its nuclear supremacy over the United States and enable it to eliminate this threat, not just to itself but to the world.
ADDED ON SEPTEMBER 10, 2008: American Puppets In Russia And IndiaThe following are two of my posts today on a Ukrainian online discussion board:-1. Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 114 Date: September 10, 2008 08:29PMI wrote above: "The mistake is to seek legitimization of the separation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia from Georgia rather than of the re-integration of Georgia as a whole into a union with Russia. A couple of years ago I wrote that the Russian parliament should adopt a resolution nullifying the illegitimate dissolution of the Soviet Union and give the government the right to take steps to change the reality on the ground at times and in a manner of its convenience and choosing. Both the de jure and de facto re-integration will be legitimised simply by the fact that a great power will be doing it, that is, by Russia itself. The Russian parliament can still pass such a resolution (effecting the de jure re-integration of Georgia with Russia) and override the resolution recognizing the separation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia from Georgia, which was a timid and self-destructive step inviting the aggression of others. " The "self-destructive" part is already coming true; according to news reports, the Russian parliament's recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia as sovereign entities has given new hope to regions in Russia like Tatarstan which want to break away from it. Those who 'manage' Vladimir Putin tried to 'neutralize' the reference to its being a "timid" act by having the media report his shooting a tiger with a tranquilizer gun and saving a TV crew it was heading for. But Russia is still headed for self-destruction.2. Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 114 Date: September 11, 2008 04:05AMIn a letter to the press dated February 8, 2006 (below ) I wrote "A former senior C.I.A. officer referred to Yeltsin as "a creature of C.I.A. support". This is even more so for the present incumbent." In a letter to the press dated September 2, 2005 (below) I wrote "The C.I.A. increasingly controls the Russian media (the placement of many C.I.A.-supplied headlines and stories on the major wire services shows hour-by-hour management of the Russian president by the C.I.A.), as it controls Indian media through the Research and Analysis Wing which functions as a branch of the C.I.A." The true nature of Vladimir Putin's relationship to the United States is indicated by a U. S. senator referring to him as "a spoiled child", as I mentioned in a letter to the press dated May 6, 2005 (below): "The C.I.A. controlled India's puppet prime ministers in part by providing misleading information which it was able to do because of their treasonous relationship with it (which kept them in office). ... A head of state who is a puppet of a foreign intelligence agency can in no way serve the interests of his country. .. Perhaps a month ago, while announcing his intention to press for expulsion of Russia from the G-8, a United States legislator referred to the Russian president as a "spoiled child". He referred to the Russian president as a child in part because of the ease with which the C.I.A. is able to control him by providing him misleading information. The Russian president refers to this as 'a very high level of relations with the United States'." As soon as I started writing about Russia in my letters to the press, sometimes making critical references to policies of the Russian government, the C.I.A. started providing the Russian intelligence agencies and President with a real time, continuous feed of the U.S. National Security Agency's satellite surveillance of me -- as it does to India's RAW -- which it has been engaged in for over 31 years. It could only let them know of this, a part of the worst crime in the history of mankind, if it had the Russian president and intelligence agencies in its pocket, as it does India's prime ministers and RAW. Putin's resuming patrols by Russian strategic bombers, etc., after my references to Putin destroying Russia's defences is like the C.I.A. arranging for India's Vajpayee to carry out the 1998 nuclear weapons tests to 'neutralize' my reference to his effectively saying "Defence is not on the agenda". The post above by a U.S. intelligence agent referring to the tiger shooting by Putin being a publicity stunt was made to make me think it is not the C.I.A. which manages Putin.
(5th Expansion) PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 8-13, 2008 The Nuclear Destruction Of New Delhi/ Delhi Will Go Ahead Regardless Of Public Awareness In Advance
The nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi is easy. The main task is to ensure that the people in India and outside know i) that it is going to occur and, so, are not surprised; ii) that, after the blast, India’s government will be in Hyderabad and its contact number will be the telephone number of DRDO. For that, these press releases of mine have to be disseminated both inside and outside India. With the Internet and E-mail, that is also easy. I have sent these to thousands of media organs inside and outside India. The more widely they are disseminated, the better. All those who are against India’s slavery to the firangis should pitch in. This includes all those against slavery to the firangis in Pakistan and other Muslim countries. Doing so and contributing their bit to the task of ending firangi rule over India will be infinitely more effective in stopping firangi attacks on Pakistan, for example, -- which, as I have said, are attacks on India -- than anything else they could do. About a decade ago, in letters to the press, I had urged Pakistan to disseminate nuclear technology, materials and even weapons to other Muslim countries as widely as possible and I have said below (in the addendum of August 4 ‘07 to December 6 ‘07) that Article 51 of India’s Constitution which says “The State shall endeavour to … maintain just and honorable relations between nations” implies it will do so also “by assisting victims of imperialism acquire necessary weapons, including nuclear weapons”. Disseminating these press releases by the Internet and E-mail is much easier. The people of China should also contribute in this task (note that in the press release dated September 3 ‘08 below, I have added “in China, in the Opium Wars to impose opium imports on China”) because the United States is the common enemy of mankind. The media in India are under almost total control of C.I.A.-RAW. But, with the Internet and E-Mail, individuals can wield the same power as newspapers, radio and TV. It is time that individuals against slavery to the United States in India and outside start exercising this power.
The nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will, however, go ahead regardless of public awareness in advance. The politicians, the civil servants, the military, the media and the people in New Delhi/ Delhi will, of course, have been destroyed in the blast. The rest of India and the world outside can be informed of what has occurred, where the Indian government is and how to contact it, etc., by E-Mail and the Internet right after the blast.
Ideally, everyone in New Delhi/ Delhi will have been killed in the blast. In fact, however, there will be a gradient of destruction radiating from ground zero. If the media had carried these press releases, those killed would have been mainly the hard core traitors. As I have said in the press release of August 19-21, 2008 below, even the destruction of RAW headquarters and the main government complexes can be effective in destroying firangi rule over India, but it is better to kill too many, right up to the entire population of New Delhi/ Delhi, than too few. How many are actually killed depends on the media and those who control the media, mainly RAW and the media and RAW have made the choice not to inform the public before the blast. Either way, it makes little difference to the objective of the blast.
As I have said, the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/Delhi will be the first such use of nuclear weapons -- within the country, against agents of a foreign power -- and the next step, after the firangi rule over India has been destroyed, will be to attain nuclear supremacy over the firangi enemy and destroy it. India’s enemies, both in and outside the country, are rushing to avoid this fate. But a nuclear blast destroying New Delhi/ Delhi takes no time and, no matter how much they rush, they cannot avoid it.
As I have said, the United States cannot be deterred, only destroyed and nuclear supremacy requires a minimum of ten thousand nuclear warheads. To get the fissile material for these, all of India’s reactors will be run in the military mode. No IAEA safeguards will be allowed on any reactors or anywhere else. No light water reactors will be imported. No nuclear technology needs to be imported and none will be. Nuclear warheads will be tested to their full yields and missiles to their full ranges.
For India, this is a life and death issue which subsumes within it all other issues, whether of security or prosperity. For the main Opposition party, the nuclear deal is not even in its list of four election issues (The Telegraph, September 14 ‘08, Internet). It is time to put an end to firangi rule over India.
(2nd Expansion) PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 6, 2008 The Nuclear Destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi Will Go Ahead Regardless of Whether the Nuclear Deal Goes Through
As I have repeatedly said below, if the nuclear deal does not go through, the United States will try to take out India’s nuclear weapons program in other ways, from counter-proliferation strikes, nuclear and other, to enforced budget cuts, etc. and, without the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi, India will continue to remain technologically, economically and militarily weak and will continue to slide into slavery to the United States. As I said below, through the nuclear deal, the United States is saying “Drop dead or I’ll kill you”. If India does not drop dead, the United States will pursue other options; the nuclear deal was simply among the ‘peaceful’ options; bribery and the control, through RAW and otherwise, of politicians, civil servants, the military and the media enable it to pursue numerous other ‘peaceful’ options; the nuclear deal was just one prong of the July 18 ‘05 joint statement and the defence framework agreement signed a few weeks before that. New Delhi/ Delhi’s politicians, civil servants, military, the media and population will continue to submit and collaborate in those other options; if the nuclear deal does not go through, it will not be for any lack of cooperation from the Indians in their own slavery which is multi-faceted and long-existing and is best illustrated by the Indians‘ collaboration, to the hilt, in the United States‘ crimes for the past 31 years against India‘s greatest scientist and greatest living Indian; a nuclear weapons program aimed at nuclear supremacy, which I urged in a letter to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December, 1982 which led to the start of the Integrated Guided Missiles Program, the Center for Advanced Technology, etc., simply threatens the United States’ ability to bring and keep India in a comprehensive state of slavery. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will go ahead even if the nuclear deal does not go through.
Without an end of the cover up regarding the above scientist India cannot be free. The traitors in New Delhi have to die for the cover up to be ended.
It needs to be emphasised that, because of the nature of the United States, India has no options other than to kill or be killed/enslaved. Failing to adopt nuclear supremacy as India’s objective wastes invaluable time and those who cover up what I have been saying about this are as much India’s enemies as the United States itself.
As for testing, I wrote in 1998, in a letter to the press, about relying on computer simulations alone, without explosive tests, “One could not legitimately rely on an automobile engine developed on that basis, if your life depended on its working the very first time it is ever used, much less a nuclear weapon.” It was because of this letter, as I have mentioned below (in the addendum of August 4 ‘07 to December 6 ‘07), that “Manmohan Singh, leading a Congress Party delegation, said to Vajpayee that some scientists (meaning the undersigned) have expressed reservations about the adequacy of the tests and the latter replied that the Government will go by the advice of the scientists in technical matters…”. The United States has conducted more than a thousand explosive tests and relies on nuclear weapons that have undergone explosive tests. I have said India needs to conduct a few dozen explosive tests of nuclear weapons, to their full yields, in the immediate future, as soon as possible and the tests must not wait for ANYTHING. India needs to test, NOW, not just preserve a “right” to test. Even a facility such as the United States’ National Ignition Facility, howsoever valuable, does not eliminate the need for explosive tests.
PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 3, 2008 The Nuclear Destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi Will Go Ahead Regardless of the Empty Noises of the Political Parties
In the addendum of December 12 ‘06 to January 9 ‘07, below, I wrote “Mukherjee’s confidence that despite some “political flak” the deal will get through was based on knowing that the BJP and the Left leaders also will obey their American bribe-givers..”. For over three years, I have suggested below numerous ways, both inside and outside Parliament, some of them extremely easy any one of which would have instantly blocked the deal. The treachery of the BJP and the CPI(M) is even more treacherous than that of the Congress party because whereas the latter’s treachery is open and visible, the former have been making noises against the nuclear deal for over three years while shunning any effective steps to block the deal that were available to them and, in fact, supporting the deal with the other side of their mouths (welcoming IAEA inspections in the case of the CPI(M), “strategic partnership” with the U.S. and letting the deal go through & simply renegotiating it if we come to power, in the case of the BJP). A former director of RAW wrote that the CPI(M) waited to withdraw support until alternative support from the Samajwadi Party was available for the nuclear deal to the Congress party. For the BJP traitors, British colonial rule over India in which millions of Indians fought for the British in Mesopotamia (now Iraq), in North Africa, in China in the Opium Wars to impose opium imports on China, against India’s emperor in 1857, etc., was a “strategic partnership”. Calling bribery of MPs “horse trading” (horse trading is legal; bribery is not), proceeding at a snail’s pace in the parliamentary committee inquiry to let the deal go through first, failing to file a criminal complaint or to directly go to the Supreme Court demanding dismissal of the prime minister for failing to uphold his oath of office or putting the deal on hold till the inquries are complete, etc., are part of the hundreds of ways the political parties have been collaborating in letting the deal through. The media and others are participating in this. The noises being made now by the political parties opposing the nuclear deal are no different from the noises they have been periodically making in the past; the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will take place regardless of such noises.
2nd PRESS RELEASE DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 2008: Willingness To Use Nuclear Weapons Is The Most Important Component Of National Security & Prosperity
In my letter dated June 27, 2004, below, I wrote “Technology, however, is necessary but not sufficient for independence; if the perceived willingness -- perceived by yourself and others -- to use your arms is zero, their value -- deterrent and other -- is zero. The United States has a decisive advantage -- ideological, economic and military -- over the rest of the world because of its demonstrated willingness to use its nuclear arms.” This applies as much to the use of nuclear arms within the country against agents of a foreign power -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will be the first such use of nuclear arms -- as outside the country. Also, as I have repeatedly emphasised, nuclear arms against the United States are needed not to “deter” it but to actually destroy it because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy, that is, to overcome deterrence. In other words, the United States cannot be deterred, only destroyed. For this India needs nuclear supremacy over the United States and a minimum of ten thousand nuclear warheads -- an objective that is well within India’s reach; attaining this objective requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi first.
PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 1, 2008: Nuking New Delhi Then The United States
The following is my post on a Ukrainian discussion board:
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 111
Date: August 30, 2008 11:58AM
A headline says "Russia slams G-7 'bias' over Georgia". A great power does not seek endorsements from other countries -- either from the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation or the G-7 -- of its internal affairs. Russia is still a great power but does not behave like one. The mistake is to seek legitimation of the separation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia from Georgia rather than of the re-integration of Georgia as a whole into a union with Russia. A couple of years ago I wrote that the Russian parliament should adopt a resolution nullifying the illegitimate dissolution of the Soviet Union and give the government the right to take steps to change the reality on the ground at times and in a manner of its convenience and choosing. Both the de jure and de facto re-integration will be legitimised simply by the fact that a great power will be doing it, that is, by Russia itself. The Russian parliament can still pass such a resolution (effecting the de jure re-integration of Georgia with Russia) and override the resolution recognizing the separation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia from Georgia, which was a timid and self-destructive step inviting the aggression of others. The United States goes around invading and doing what it damn pleases -- partitioning, brutalising the population, exploiting and looting, committing genocides and thousands of large scale atrocities, hanging the President and what not -- with countries half way around the world; Russia seeks the pleasure of the United States about acting in its own sister republics. There will be a lot of support in Georgia, including from the people of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, for Georgia's re-integration with Russia. Speaking as an Indian, we will destroy this monster, this evil, the United States (http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com ). Instead of making common cause with the United States against us, Russia should recapture its utopian vision (see the very first post in this thread). Russia sought the support of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation in the Georgia matter -- from the East; whether or not a great power would have sought such support, it was a responsible and positive thing to do. Unfortunately, China's self-interest, as it sees it currently, is not in the re-integration of the republics of the Soviet Union. But India was there as an observer and, whether through the SCO or bilaterally or both, India should have strongly supported the re-integration of the former republics of the Soviet Union. Unfortunately, India is currently 'ruled' by puppets and lackeys of the United States busily giving away India into slavery to the United States. So, understandably, Russia has turned to its near-West and sought more observers from the OSCE. No harm in that as an intermediate step. But, for the longer term, a vote in the Russian parliament nullifying the illegitimate dissolution of the Soviet Union will set the stage for the reversal of that disaster and the reversal can be done gradually and peacefully, for the most part. THAT is the organization -- a restored union of republics -- Russia should focus on joining more than the G-7 or the OSCE. That seems to be a pre-requisite before it can feel and act like a great power again. More importantly, it needs to find a mission and ideology, instead of being a camp-follower of the United States. Such a mission and ideology is available in my proposal about money, referred to in the first post of this thread, but that is being suppressed by the United States and Russia, like India, is unfortunately collaborating in the suppression. Russia has to stop doing that not just for a future better than it is currently headed for but better than what the Soviet Union was headed for. My own focus is and has to be on bringing that about in India first. The United States controls India's 'rulers' by not just direct bribery but by keeping track of the billions in kickbacks they keep in foreign bank accounts. About a year ago, press reports said Russia's president has more than a hundred billion dollars in foreign bank accounts. India's 'rulers' have no interest in serving India's interests. Through an Indian intelligence agency that functions as a branch of the C.I.A., the United States keeps control over India's politicians, civil servants, military and the media and, through the media, over the population. It has used the same paradigm in controlling Russia. Things will not change until the United States is directly destroyed with a nuclear first strike with thousands of nuclear weapons. Russia will not do it but India will.
(EXPANDED) PRESS RELEASE AUGUST 27, 2008: RAW and the Problems of DRDO & Kashmir
1. The following is my post on Indian Defence Forum in response to a post regarding the problem of attracting and retaining scientific and engineering talent that the Defence Research & Development Organization (DRDO) is facing:-
“Isn't the problem that of paying the scientists and engineers wages competitive with the private sector? In non-technical cadres like the IAS, people -- including from the IITs, etc. -- come because there are a lot of social and other 'perks' associated with being, say, a district collector, including financial ones; many IAS people become crorepatis in no time at all regardless of their official pay. A scientist or engineer, toiling away in a lab or workshop has no such 'perks' -- aside from the satisfaction of working for the motherland. And they have been doing wonderful work. The necessity of paying competitive wages to DRDO, AEC and ISRO scientists and engineers (similar issues exist in the armed forces) has been often emphasised. Such policies are usually determined by the Research & Analysis Wing (RAW), whether through a pay commission or otherwise and, as I have shown (http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com;/ I have collected some of my comments on RAW in that blog into a press release, dated August 26, 2008 and will post it also in the blog), RAW, which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India, is dedicated to sabotaging India's indigenous research and development, especially in the defence field. The failure to address the problem of attracting and retaining talent by paying competitive wages is part of such sabotage. I have said that RAW has to be destroyed for India to realise its potential in both the economic and defence fields.”
2. Recently there have been a number of columns/articles in Indian newspapers urging the grant of ‘azadi’ to Kashmir. Like the celebratory headlines (such as “azadi in air” in the RAW-mouthpiece Times of India) that I referred to below, these columns/articles are all RAW-sponsored. As I said many years ago, RAW keeps a large stable of writers/journalists for such purposes. These columns/articles were sponsored by RAW in response to what I said about Kashmir, when approached for signature on a petition regarding the Baltics and mentioned in the Press Release dated August 15, 2008 below (“I am from India. We wouldn’t let Kashmir go if we have to kill every single Kashmiri”). These columns commenced with one by Arundhati Roy who was brought by RAW into its stable when I wrote a critical review of her novel. Later, when I referred to her as ‘The inferior Indian nigger woman whose claim to press coverage is her pornographic novel calling Indians cannibals (which they are not; see my review of the book which the inferior Indian niggers of the Indian press never published, in part due to the intervention of the inferior Indian niggers of the Indian Stupid Agency which promoted her by, among other things, arranging for her to be feted in Sri Lanka after my review)…’, RAW turned her overnight into a social and political activist and arranged for her to give a press conference on some Indian social issue in New York City because the New York correspondent for the United News of India (UNI) had once volunteered to arrange a press conference for me in New York on the subject of the United States using India’s population as guinea pigs for AIDS vaccine development on which I had been writing. (When the Boston Globe published a letter of mine, after its editorial on the rising incidence of dowry killings in India by relatives demanding cars, VCRs, etc., in which I said it was a consequence of rising “consumerism” due to contact with the West which used to be forbidden so that both the young Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru were required to do penance and undergo purification before being allowed back into society on their return from England, though only Gandhi -- who later launched a mass movement to shun Western consumer goods and ritually burned them in bonfires -- complied, RAW sponsored large annual conferences at Harvard University for several years on the subject of India’s dowry deaths -- just one of hundreds of such acts of ‘neutralizing’ me it has undertaken). Roy’s article urging ‘azadi’ for Kashmir was followed by similar columns by Vir Sanghvi in Hindustan Times and by S. A. Aiyar and Jug Suraiya in the Times of India -- all of them operatives of C.I.A.-RAW -- and others while RAW organised further ‘azadi’ rallies in Kashmir of the kind I referred to below. The Times of India also sponsored a public opinion poll asking whether India should let Kashmir “go”, to make the unthinkable thinkable in India (see the Press Release dated August 26, 2008 below, “What You Should Know About RAW”).
3. In a post on the Indian Defence Forum three weeks ago I said:
“It is not just that India's home-grown missile scientists are the best in the world or even the Arjun tank is more than a match for any in its class. With a proper budget and man (and woman) power -- I have been calling for at least a tenfold increase in the DRDO budget and a tenfold increase in its scientific and technical head count and this can be done very easily ( http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com/ ) -- there is nothing that can keep India from being militarily supreme in the world.Except the nuclear deal and the United States' invasion of India in the form of the IAEA inspections, etc. The nuclear deal is meant to bind India into perpetual slavery. With it, all of the above potential will be suppressed and that is the main purpose of the nuclear deal. That is why DRDO has to take control of the Indian government (see http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com/ ).”
The stupidity and slavishness of Indians, extending their thousand years of slavery, is on display yet again; all those who have been opposed to the nuclear deal have shifted to simply demanding a “clean and unconditional” NSG waiver, as if all the things that have gone before -- the IAEA inspections, the 123 agreement with its provision for domestic laws, the separation agreement and the joint statement of July 18 ‘05 with its multifarious provisions for slavery -- don’t matter. Argument is of no avail with the deeply enslaved Indians. Only the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will end it.
4. It was to neutralize my saying that Vajpayee’s “Hate is not on the agenda” amounted to saying “Defence is not on the agenda” (see “A Note About Hate” below) that the C.I.A. arranged for Vajpayee to carry out the 1998 nuclear tests, to be followed by a capping of India’s nuclear program, signing the CTBT, etc. The United States had made a big show of having been surprised by the tests and announced a drastic increase in its intelligence agents in India, etc. and, in a letter to the press right after the tests saying that the tests had been pre-arranged with the United States, I asked why would any one ANNOUNCE they will increase the number of intelligence agents in India, etc. ? A little before the tests, a report in the Times of India -- which disappeared shortly after I saw it on the Internet -- referred to pressures, both internal and external, not to carry out the tests. Such pressures could only be exerted if the external power exerting the pressure knew about the impending tests. Note that, as I mentioned in a letter to the press several years ago, the control of India’s nuclear weapons was taken away from Vajpayee and given to K. R. Narayanan (who was President) -- unless Vajpayee relinquished it voluntarily -- after I wrote along the above lines questioning Vajpayee’s loyalty/ trustworthiness.
As I have written more than once below, Kargil was a C.I.A.-RAW operation, with the cooperation of Pakistan’s C.I.A.-controlled army chief, to make Vajpayee win the pending election after Vajpayee had lost a confidence vote. As I have written below, Clinton’s visit and meeting Vajpayee, a lifelong agent of the British and the Americans, in Lucknow a couple of years ago were to give him further C.I.A. money, etc. That is why Vajpayee’s lifelong assistant and fool (see my letter dated July 11, 2005 below saying “Vajpayee had arranged for a small explosion to be set off near the British School in New Delhi, run by Britain's embassy, which caused no damage or injuries but which gained him credit with his followers for a 'nationalist' stance against English-medium schools. A little act like that can keep his followers fooled and enable him to 'string them along' for at least a half dozen years”; Nehru succeeded in fooling everyone all the time, at least till about 25 years after his death; about a decade ago, I wrote about Indira Gandhi‘s “I am a soul in agony” -- which The Times of London carried as a banner in the top margin of its pages -- after the British told her of Nehru being a lifelong loyalist to the British throne and later standing like a courtier with folded hands before the British queen at Rashtrapati Bhavan and being given, as a substitute for the British queen, the latter‘s annual Christmas address on British radio and TV), Advani, has not vigorously pursued the bribery in the recent confidence vote, called the continuation in office of this government illegitimate (quite to the contrary) or filled the jails (“Jail Bharo”) for this illegitimate government pursuing the nuclear deal; the C.I.A. can counter that by revealing Vajpayee and others in the BJP being on its payroll. As I have said below, the role of politicians in governing India is insignificant compared to that of C.I.A.-RAW but RAW has no place in the public’s consciousness or the discussion of public affairs in India. Some of the crimes against me were committed at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. To neutralize that, Jaswant Singh, a couple of years ago, was brought to the Kennedy School for a period of time as a Fellow (also to facilitate bringing entire batches of IAS people to be “trained” at the Kennedy School -- whose faculty will determine their eligibility for future promotions -- and make them formally subservient to the United States; similar programs are in place to “train” Indian Members of Parliament at U.S. universities).
After my press release of August 26, 2008, below, referring to documentation of the sabotage of the Arjun tank, retired Gen. J. J. Singh, now Governor of Arunachal Pradesh, who, as Chief of Army Staff, had trashed the Arjun tank and voiced strong support for the nuclear deal, said India and the U.S. are “natural partners” and welcomed the growth, in “leaps and bounds”, of military cooperation with it. A headline yesterday said the U.S. and Russia will “help” ISRO track its Chandrayaan mission. The Chandrayaan mission had been planned to be autonomous. On January 24, 2006 I wrote below “It is reported (The Pioneer, January 15 '06, Internet) that the U.S. space agency, NASA, is to "review" the "preliminary design" of India's 'Chandrayan 1' moon mission preparatory to putting its payload on it. Just as the move to shove foreign nuclear technology down India's throat through RAW is meant to enable the U.S. to take control of India's nuclear program, this is a move by the C.I.A., through RAW, to enable the U.S. to take control of India's space program which had taken on European payloads for this mission and given excuses of funding problems, etc., precisely to avoid the U.S. payload and the nefarious design behind it. India should reject all such 'cooperation' and not allow the U.S. to touch its space program with a million mile pole.” As in the case of the nuclear program, top ISRO scientists have been bribed to bring the space program under American control. Former ISRO chief, Kasturirangan, now a member of the Rajya Sabha, strongly supports the nuclear deal also (governorships and Rajya Sabha memberships are one of the ways C.I.A.-RAW rewards traitors).