Letters to the Press

PRESS RELEASE August 26, 2008 What You Should Know About RAW
(For background material see http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com/ )
I have written (for example in my article titled ‘India’s Technological and Economic Emancipation’ in my blog titled ‘Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S. : http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com/ ) about the continued control of Indian intelligence agencies by British and later American intelligence agencies after 1947. India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) was split off from the Intelligence Bureau which had continued after 1947 to be loyal to the British. Later the Americans supplanted the British and RAW functions as a branch of the CIA against India. As part of this relationship, CIA-RAW exercises extensive control over the Indian media and, among its various activities, engages in sabotage of indigenous research and development to keep India dependent on other countries for defence and other equipment (the nuclear deal is just another CIA-RAW operation of that kind, though of a scope and with consequences far graver than any such operation till now).
An example of this is a Bharat-Rakshak discussion thread about a black box installed by the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO) in the indigenously developed Arjun tank that documented the sabotage of its engines during trials by the Army; such sabotage has been the basis of the Army's rejection, on RAW's prompting, of the Arjun tank in favour of imports (as I said in the above article, India‘s Army is the collaborator Army that helped the British rule India and, even after Independence, all its regiments and units have retained their former identities and regularly celebrate the anniversaries of their founding by the British). A CIA-RAW operative, who serves as a moderator on Bharat-Rakshak and controls the forum, recently locked away this discussion thread so that numerous posts that had appeared documenting the sabotage of the Arjun tank were covered up. The major metropolitan newspapers, on most of which CIA-RAW exercises extensive control, have made no mention of the black box -- which was like the flight data recorder in aircraft -- installed by DRDO in Arjun tanks and the shocking findings about the sabotage even though a report on this was provided to them by the Indo Asian News Service (IANS).
There is across the board sabotage by various means by CIA-RAW to keep India down technologically, economically and militarily. RAW's grip over India is comparable to the old KGB's grip over the Soviet Union, with the difference that whereas the KGB worked for the good of the Soviet Union, except toward the end, RAW has always worked for its imperialist paymasters. The role of politicians in governing India is insignificant compared to that of CIA-RAW but RAW has no place in the public's consciousness or in discussions of public affairs in India.
An important point about the sabotage of Arjun is that people on the Arjun discussion thread on Bharat-Rakshak were aghast at the Army's behavior and calling for Army brass being tried for treason, etc. but it will be a mistake to stop with the Army; it is RAW which is behind such sabotage not just of Arjun but of India's interests, technological, economic and other, in a lot of areas. RAW has operatives in the Army at various levels but it is necessary to go to the root of the problem. RAW has to be destroyed and I have suggested that a brand new external intelligence agency be formed with the help of military intelligence (RAW is supposed to be India's external intelligence agency but at least 90% of its activities are within India, against India).
The destruction of RAW does not mean simply disbanding the agency and letting its employees continue their service to the CIA through other organisations, old or new, or in other roles. It is a mammoth agency with just the number of joint secretaries in the hundreds. It is India’s real ‘government’ and the politicians and civil servants largely obey its dictates. It puts the words in the mouths of cabinet ministers, etc., and determines most policies that are, erroneously, attributed to them. Any one, even a prime minister, whom CIA-RAW considers inconvenient is eliminated, if necessary by death, as I have said regarding the deaths of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and, later, Rajiv Gandhi in my article titled ‘How India‘s economy can grow 30% per year‘ in my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over US' on blogspot ( http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com/ )which can be found by doing a Google search with the words: nuclear supremacy India Satish.
Over the past many years, I have shown how almost all terrorist incidents in India since 1983 have been carried out by outfits controlled by the CIA either directly or through intelligence agencies in the region, including India’s RAW. The Jain Commision of Inquiry, which went into Rajiv Gandhi’s death, acknowledged that the LTTE, which carried out his assassination, was created and controlled by RAW. It was an open secret that MQM, in Pakistan’s Sindh province, when it was known as a terrorist organization, was a creation of RAW. But the same is true of many terrorist outfits that operate in India.
Another example of RAW’s multifarious activities, that I have described in press releases, articles and letters to the press since 1987, is its spreading heroin addiction and AIDS first in India’s Northeast then elsewhere to provide the United States with a population to use as guinea pigs for AIDS vaccine development, after the CIA was assigned the task of roping in a population for this purpose. I have described how Both Rajiv Gandhi (after being blackmailed with threats of exposure of the Bofors and HDW kickbacks by Swedish and German media at the CIA‘s instigation) and Vajpayee cooperated in this. But terrorism, etc., are the least of its activities; I mentioned those only because the existence of terrorism is publicly known. Its sabotage of India’s research and development activities, of which the sabotage of the Arjun tank is just one example, is among the deadliest of its activities.
The nuclear deal and its various aspects -- replacing indigenous production of uranium and reactors with imports, the capping, rollback and elimination of India’s nuclear weapons program, media control and buying up politicians, scientists, etc. for this purpose -- is just the largest and deadliest of such activities, leaving out the 24-hour satellite surveillance and all the crimes, at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars per year for the past 31 years, against India’s greatest scientist, described in my article titled ‘How India‘s economy can grow 30% per year‘. The point is that all the tens of thousands of RAW employees are guilty of the gravest treason and deserve the death penalty. So do all those -- politicians, civil servants and others -- who are willing collaborators of CIA-RAW.
(5th Expansion) PRESS RELEASE August 19-21, 2008: Size of Nuclear Blast That Will Destroy New Delhi/ Delhi
It needs to be emphasized that the traitor politicians and others in New Delhi need to be destroyed more than the separatists in Kashmir, for example, because the separatism in Kashmir and elsewhere, with its ancillary problems, is a product of and under the control of C.I.A.-RAW and the politicians, by keeping silent about this, are collaborating in it. The same about terrorism and all of India’s economic problems. By keeping silent about the central role of the United States in engendering -- through C.I.A.-RAW -- separatism and terrorism in India and in keeping India economically and militarily weak and by collaborating, by silence or otherwise, in bringing India into the deepest slavery to the United States through the nuclear deal, the politicians are collaborating with India’s number one enemy, the United States, which bribes them and keeps them, in and out of office, as its puppets. If the postponement of the Parliament session is to enable the nuclear deal to go through first, the politicians are not filling the jails (‘Jail Bharo’) against the imposition of this slavery to the United States by an illegitimate government but on ancillary issues -- such as Amarnath -- which are simply byproducts of American-inspired, through C.I.A.-RAW, separatism timed to take attention away from the invasion and enslavement of India through the nuclear deal. If the postponement of the Parliament session is to avoid dying in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/Delhi, that only shows that the politicians are aware of their own treason. With a thousand year history of slavery, treason and slavery come naturally to Indians and, since the Indians in New Delhi/Delhi are the ones obstructing a change in this state of affairs, they are the ones who have to be destroyed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/Delhi. This objective will be achieved even if they stay away from New Delhi/ Delhi. An indefinite postponement of the Parliament session does not mean postponement of the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi.
Despite what I said in the addendum dated July 30, 2008 below about the mediocre Indian (Amartya Sen) being the firangis’ dummy substitute for me and in the press release of August 7 ‘08 about India’s media shutting out the news and views of India’s greatest scientist, that mediocre Indian was brought to address India’s Parliament which, though in recess, was summoned for this purpose by calling meetings of all 20 or so of its committees on that day. This is only the latest in the series of crimes -- the worst in the history of mankind -- going on for the past three decades. As I said on August 7 ‘08, this cannot be allowed.
As I have said before, after India’s nuclear first strike on the United States, the Americans will be eating each other, including skin, innards and bones, till no one remains alive. Indians will not be eating each other; after the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi, they will leave the ground of the capital region covered with bleaching bones.
Killing a few million Indians in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi is nothing more than killing cockroaches. It will not make even a dent in India’s economic or military strength. On the other hand, it will open the flood gates to both economic prosperity for India and its nuclear supremacy over the United States and enable India to eliminate its number one enemy.
In the press release dated August 17 ‘08 below, I referred to Hindus in Kashmir having been driven out in an act of “ethnic cleansing”. But ethnically Kashmiri Hindus are identical to Kashmiri Muslims who are simply converted Hindus, converted by militarily stronger invaders. The same is true of the rest of the subcontinent’s Muslims. The separatism in Kashmir now or elsewhere in the subcontinent in 1947 is and was simply a consequence of Indians’ failure to have military supremacy. The cockroaches in New Delhi/ Delhi, who do not want military, that is nuclear, supremacy for India now cannot be exterminated soon enough. I am the only one calling for nuclear supremacy for India and pointing out that the so-called nuclear deal is utterly incompatible with India’s nuclear supremacy over the United States. The cockroaches of the media who are failing to report what I am saying and the rest of the cockroaches in New Delhi/ Delhi who are collaborating in the cover up of the news and views of India’s greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, all deserve and will get the swiftest death.
The conversion of Hindus to Muslims occurred because of the failure of Indians to have military supremacy over the Muslim invaders. But the separatism in 1947 and now was and is a consequence of Indians’ failure to have military supremacy over the firangis; as I have said, the communal riots, aimed at breaking up India, in 1947 were instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which remained loyal to the British after 1947 and the separatism in Kashmir and elsewhere now is instigated and controlled by RAW which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India. All of the government policies, including the nuclear deal, which keep India technologically, economically and militarily weak and enslaved to the firangi, are dictated by C.I.A.-RAW which controls the politicians, the civil servants, the military and the media and, through the media, controls the population. India’s independence now requires military, that is nuclear, supremacy over the firangis. The firangi and, in particular, the most powerful firangi country, the United States, is the enemy to destroy now. This requires first destroying the firangi’s agents in New Delhi/ Delhi -- the politicians, the civil servants, the military and the media. The people of New Delhi/ Delhi, like the residents of Delhi in 1858 who, by the hundreds of thousands, silently stood and watched the arrest of India’s emperor by a lone firangi (described below), are also collaborators in India’s slavery to the firangi and will be destroyed.
I have referred to a few million Indians dying in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi. In fact even a twenty kiloton blast, which will kill fewer, can be effective in destroying the firangi rule over India, so long as it destroys the RAW headquarters and the main government complexes. The point is that it is better to kill too many, right up to the entire population of New Delhi/ Delhi, than too few. Some of the newspaper offices are on Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, technically in Old Delhi. Because of the sprawling nature of New Delhi, Akashvani and Doordarshan offices, for example, are a fair distance from the main government complexes. Convenience decides the size of the blast.
PRESS RELEASE August 17, 2008: The Nuclear Destruction of New Delhi/Delhi
The peril to India -- the invasion of India in the form of IAEA inspections etc. and being bound in the deepest slavery -- requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi, not tanks and fighter planes. The RAW-organized “Azadi” rally in Kashmir this week with the RAW-mouthpiece, Times of India, carrying a celebratory headline of “azadi in air” as did other Indian media, not in Kashmir but in New Delhi/ Delhi itself (the celebratory headlines about the nuclear deal are similarly RAW-inspired) and the failure of the armed forces to destroy RAW -- a branch of the C.I.A. against India -- represent the depth and duration of C.I.A. control of India which requires a nuclear explosion to destroy. About a decade ago, when the Indian Air force was sending planes to Sri Lanka to deal with the LTTE, I wrote that it should bomb and destroy the RAW headquarters in New Delhi instead and the problem in Sri Lanka will automatically be solved. This is also true of all separatist movements in India, all terrorism and will remove the principal impediment to India’s technological, economic and military strength. But the military itself is loyal to the firangis, as are politicians, the civil servants and the people of New Delhi/ Delhi. The four million inhabitants of the Kashmir Valley -- who have driven out all the Hindus, in an act of ethnic cleansing, into refugee camps where they remain -- could in principle be herded into an extermination circle and killed with a nuclear explosion but that would not destroy firangi rule over India or rule by C.I.A.-RAW which requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi itself.
PRESS RELEASE August 15, 2008: Promoting Separatism In Russia & India:
(Note: The Soviet Union was known simply as “Roos” in India)
The following are my posts today on a Ukrainian online discussion board:-
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 101
Date: August 15, 2008 03:43PM
Russia should have resisted the internationalization of the Georgia operation, removed the American puppet and re-integrated Georgia with Russia into the union state of which Belarus is a part. The disintegration of the Soviet Union was a C.I.A. operation. The sooner that process is reversed the better for all of the republics that were its constituents.
Posted by: Tom (IP Logged) • Posts: 13691
Date: August 15, 2008 03:45PM
Spoken like a true soviet.
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 101
Date: August 15, 2008 03:53PM
This does not mean that they should go back to the same economic system necessarily; but politically they should be reintegrated.
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 101
Date: August 15, 2008 04:05PM
Georgia is Russia's internal affair and no meddling by the United States should be allowed.
Posted by: Tom (IP Logged) • Posts: 13706
Date: August 15, 2008 04:09PM
Since when did Georgia belong to Russia, or are you forgetting that its 2008, not 20 years ago. Wake-up and smell the coffee. Georgia can set its own destiny with whatever country the please. Thats what we call freedom, which is not known much in the Russia.
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 101
Date: August 15, 2008 04:10PM
Tom Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Spoken like a true soviet. Actually, I was speaking like a true Indian. The United States is constantly trying to do to India -- disintegrate it -- what it did to the Soviet Union. (http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com )
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 101
Date: August 15, 2008 04:33PM
When some people in the United States approached me for signature on a petition regarding the Baltics (this was when they were still part of the Soviet Union), I said "I am from India. We wouldn't let Kashmir go if we have to kill every single Kashmiri". In fact the number of lives that would be lost if Kashmir were separated from India would far exceed the population of Kashmir.
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 101
Date: August 15, 2008 04:44PM
Promoting separatism in other countries is a constant game -- but it is not a game, it is a form of warfare -- that the United States plays/wages. You know what they did to separatists in their own country -- in the American Civil War. The Russian operation in Georgia is a police operation, not a civil war. It is dealing with the consequences of American mischief in their country.
Posted by: Nestor (IP Logged) • Posts: 4073
Date: August 15, 2008 05:10PM
Thats why India is still a 3rd world country.........................."Дякую Тобі, Боже, .......... Що Я Не Москаль!!!!"
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 102
Date: August 15, 2008 05:49PM
I can only respond to what you wrote in English. India is not already an economic and military super power because of suppression by the United States of India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian and putting in place its puppets and lackeys, as it has now done in Russia, Ukraine and Georgia. But soon it will be both an economic and military super power and obliterate the United States from the face of the Earth. See [nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com]
Posted by: Nestor (IP Logged) • Posts: 4075
Date: August 15, 2008 06:08PM
Then please, have India return the $143,699,000 it recieves annually in US Foreign Aid. Amounting to an estimated 55 Billion dollars since world war II. "Дякую Тобі, Боже, .......... Що Я Не Москаль!!!!"
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 103
Date: August 15, 2008 06:16PM
The so-called "aid" is not only not needed, it is poison and will not be accepted when India is free of C.I.A.-imposed puppets and lackeys. What the Americans and their cousins, the British, have looted from India is incomparably greater than the amount of 'aid" you cite (though India's current prime minister, an American puppet and lackey, thanked the British for what they did to India when the British were giving him an honorary doctorate).
Posted by: Nestor (IP Logged) • Posts: 4081
Date: August 15, 2008 06:22PM
Well, send it back, I could use a nice tax refund..................."Дякую Тобі, Боже, .......... Що Я Не Москаль!!!!"
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 107
Date: August 15, 2008 08:01PM
I will quote from my very first post in this thread: "...As we know in India, separatism has no limits: ten fragments will break into a hundred, a hundred fragments into a thousand."
Posted by: Tom (IP Logged) • Posts: 13706
Date: August 15, 2008 09:26PM
Tom Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Since when did Georgia belong to Russia, or are > you forgetting that its 2008, not 20 years ago. > Wake-up and smell the coffee. Georgia can set its > own destiny with whatever country the please. > Thats what we call freedom, which is not known > much in the Russia. Is there any specific reason you didn't respond the this post? Or is it, you don't have a good explanation as to what should Georgia do and who Georgia belongs too?
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 107
Date: August 15, 2008 09:59PM
I was not saying Georgia belongs to Russia; they both belong together (the term "Roos" was used for the Soviet Union as a whole in India and elsewhere) in a union; that is why I referred to Georgia joining the union of republics of which Russia and Belarus are a part. Considering that Josef Stalin was a Georgian, it would be more accurate to say that Russia belonged to Georgia, if we have to use that term! Separatism can be promoted on various grounds, such as "freedom", without limit just as South Ossetia and Abkhazia have broken away from Georgia on such grounds. A suburb of Moscow could claim to be a separate country and demand freedom but all such claims of "freedom" are misguided. The former Soviet Union was a union of republics and I was saying they are better off together, whether they remain "Soviet" or not. Otherwise both Russia and Georgia are falling prey to mischief by mainly the United States.
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 107
Date: August 15, 2008 10:11PM
Online discussion boards like this one are full of posts by intelligence agents of various countries (American agents outnumber the agents of all other countries combined) who try to shape the climate of opinion on such boards and if you are here to promote the American agenda (I am not saying you are; but you could be), that is a different matter. Russia has been economically MUCH, MUCH worse off after the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the same is probably true of Georgia and other republics; but American agents naturally try to spin things to make it appear that they are better off after the break up -- because that is what suits American interests. Economic well-being is a major component of freedom.
Posted by: Tom (IP Logged) • Posts: 13706
Date: August 15, 2008 10:16PM
So, Georgia shouldn't choose its own destiny according to you. Then shouldn't India be a part of it neighbors? Should Canada be a part of the US? Should Germany be a part of France? Should the Dominicna Republic be a part of Haiti? So none of these countries as Georgia should choose its own destiny? Should Georgia (a democratically based country) should be a part of a non-democratic country as Russia. Are you okay, or has the Russian propaganda brainwashed your way of thinking? Tell me. After all you're writing about, why do you live in the US? Obviously, you won't answer that question.
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 107
Date: August 15, 2008 10:23PM
I am in the United States because the C.I.A. rules India through an Indian intelligence agency and others and I was forced back to the United States by grabbing my money and properties in India and, in various ways, making it impossible for me to live in India; in India I was (in principle, still am) a multi-millionaire even in dollar terms and here in the United States I live in the direst poverty, but they have left me with no freedom in the matter (see [satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com]). You are the one brainwashed by American propaganda, unless you are an American agent. Ever heard of the persecution of Sakharov and Solzhenitsyn? Mine is an infinitely worse case but you wouldn't have heard about it, because the evil empire of the United States is so much worse and so much more powerful. By the way, I am listed in Who's Who In America (2008 and earlier editions) and Who's Who In the World (2009 edition, published Oct. 2008).PRESS RELEASE August 14, 2008 Hey Stupid Residents Of Delhi/New Delhi, You Are About To Die In A Nuclear Explosion!
(This is a revised press release because all 26 of my articles/blogs published on sulekha.com, some of which were referred to in the press release sent earlier, have disappeared. In the press release of August 14 ‘08, three paragraphs have been added to the press release of August 12 ‘08).
The illegitimate, traitor 'government' in New Delhi cannot enter into any IAEA agreements for India. No IAEA inspections of any Indian facilities, beyond those that were under such inspections on January 1, 2006, will be allowed. Even those facilities that were under IAEA inspections on January 1, 2006 may, in fact will, be withdrawn from such inspections.
The traitors of the B.J.P. responded to my reference to the firangi control of India's media (see addendums below) by trying to divert attention away from the firangi enemy -- and the firangis' invasion of India in the form of the IAEA inspections -- and direct it toward other Indians (which is what Bangladeshis, like other muslims of the subcontinent, are); a B.J.P. spokesman referred to Bangladeshi "infiltration", never mind the firangis' invasion of India's nuclear program and infiltration -- which in fact is almost total control -- of Indian media, government, politicians, etc. The nuclear bomb that will destroy New Delhi will destroy the B.J.P. traitors as surely as any other (see addendums below).
As I have said (see addendums below) getting India's nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, whether or not India imports American reactors, has been a prime American goal because at least 75% of the damage to India's nuclear program would have been done once the facilities are placed under IAEA inspections, even if nothing further is done and no nuclear deal with the United States is finally signed and no foreign reactors, from the United States or from Russia or France, are bought. Any move to put Indian nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, beyond the ones under IAEA inspections at present, is a grave injury to the nation and an invasion of India like the American invasion of Iraq and deserves a response appropriate to an invasion.
A country that has ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States cannot be restricted from importing, without IAEA inspections, etc., however much uranium it wants from wherever it wants by the United States or any other power; the power of nuclear weapons is what India needs; electricity can be produced in numerous other ways for the time being. Agreeing to even talks on new inspections with the IAEA -- an instrument of American imperialism -- are acts of treason and deserve commensurately severe punishment. Nuclear supremacy over the United States has to be India's national objective and its one point agenda (see addendums below). The IAEA inspections are totally incompatible with nuclear supremacy over the United States and deserve to be summarily rejected without going into any details.
The assault on India's nuclear program, of which the IAEA inspections are the central part, is the present day version of a foreign invasion. Military supremacy over an invader is not optional but essential for survival. Military supremacy today means nuclear supremacy. But "nuclear supremacy" or "strategic nuclear supremacy" for India is not even mentioned by Indian politicians, press, 'strategic experts', etc., infiltrated and controlled as they are by the firangi enemy. As I have said, many Iraqi generals were bought up by Americans in the course of their 2003 invasion but it did not make it any less of an invasion and the invasion was expressly called an invasion on Iraq's nuclear program. The fact that many Indian politicians and others have been bought up does not make this any less of an invasion. This is a war for survival and for independence and requires the energy, speed, commitment and a full spectrum mobilisation appropriate to a war.Internal security is a necessary component of national security. For India, internal security requires the following:1) Citizen inspectors should constantly inspect all nuclear facilities, particularly those included in the 'civilian list' for IAEA inspections, for any signs of inspections by firangis or their agents brought in the past or future, by stealth or otherwise, to ensure that no IAEA inspections take place (see addendums below).2) No firangi should be allowed on the streets of Indian cities or elsewhere unless accompanied by firangi-watchers and firangi-hunters and can satisfy the latter that he/she is going for some legitimate purpose -- such as buying food -- and will not engage in activities to infiltrate/subvert Indian institutions or individuals in any way by engaging in conversations or other interactions/associations that are not legitimate such as asking the price of a food item he/she wants to buy.3) Any Indian found associating with firangis in any way should be beaten to death on the spot.In a country such as North Korea, firangi-watchers and firangi-hunters could ensure that no firangi can subvert any institutions or individuals in their country. But then the firangis enforce/threaten to enforce their control over their country by military force/invasion. IAEA inspections are always backed up by military force/invasions by the firangis. In India, the military and civil servants have always been loyal to the firangis, as I showed in the addendum dated July 25, 2008, titled 'The Day India's Emperor Was Arrested By A Lone Englishman' below . In addition, as I said in the same addendum, "No one in Delhi/New Delhi wants nuclear supremacy for India" (see my article titled 'Why Nuclear Supremacy?' in addendum dated July 19, 2008, below ) and thus the entire population of Delhi/New Delhi consists of traitors. That is why killing off the politicians, the military, the civil servants and the rest of the population of Delhi/New Delhi with a nuclear bomb is necessary to save India as a whole; the ban against the firangis can then be enforced in the rest of India till India has ten thousand nuclear warheads and can kill off the entire population of the most powerful firangi country.Like the recent bomb blasts in Bangalore and Ahmedabad and the firing along the Line of Control in J & K, the Amarnath land row, "the worst communal flare-up … since 1947" (Hindustan Times), has been instigated by C.I.A.-RAW to take attention away from the firangi enemy and his invasion of India with the IAEA inspections, etc. -- just as the communal riots in 1947 were instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which, as I have said, remained loyal to the British after 1947, so the stupid Indians killed one another by the millions while keeping the top firangi, Mountbatten, Governor General of "independent" India. As I have repeatedly said (see my letter dated May 15, 2004 below) "No more than about 80,000 British, women and children included, ruled India for centuries. Nothing that can be said about the stupidity and slavisheness of Indians will be an exaggeration.” But, with a nuclear bomb killing a few million of these stupid Indians in Delhi/New Delhi, India as a whole can be saved (see my articles 'Imminent End Of Firangi Rule Over India' in the addendum dated July 19, 2008 below and 'After The Destruction Of New Delhi' in addendum dated July 30, 2008 below ).
India’s media have continued to shut out the views of India’s greatest scientist while the mediocre Indian who was given the Nobel prize as a dummy substitute for him ( see addendum dated July 30, 2008 below) is going to address India’s parliament, according to Indian press reports. Such goings on cannot be allowed.
In the addendum dated August 1, 2008, below I referred to “thousands of headlines that are missing from India’s media”. But theirs are not simply crimes of omission; some of them participate in the crimes they are covering up. As I said in the addendum dated August 1, 2008, all Indian media are controlled by the firangis. The media people in Delhi/New Delhi will also die in the nuclear explosion that will destroy Delhi/New Delhi.
The participation by the media in these crimes has had the direst consequences for India, economically, militarily and strategically. A columnist (Tavleen Singh) two decades ago referred to the rewards for such participation such as “senior journalists” being given, “virtually free”, government accomodations in New Delhi that would rent at a minimum of fifty thousand rupees per month at market rates (now they would rent at several lakhs per month) -- upon which she was sent on C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored junkets to the United States to see how well mediocre Indians (like Amartya Sen) were doing at U. S. universities and now she has been an enthusiastic participant in these crimes for many years -- but such participation extends all across the media, from “lifafa” journalists (a term used on Bharat-Rakshak for journalists who receive envelopes full of cash from the American embassy) to those who simply aspire for a green card. Others participate without any specific inducement. But the participation is universal. A non-specific destruction of New Delhi by a nuclear bomb -- except that it will be centered on RAW headquarters -- will destroy the media also non-specifically.
Arun Shourie, after he was no longer chief editor of the Times Of India, said “Akhbar nahin, sarkar hai” (it is not a newspaper, it is the Government). But the same applies to the media as a whole. Shourie first received documentation of the crimes against India’s greatest scientist in 1982, sent by Indians at a U.S. university who knew of Shourie’s fame. With a Ph.D. in Economics from a U.S. university, he was undoubtedly a member of the Cabinet Committee on Economic Strategy that Vajpayee formed to steal my proposal about money. His columns against the nuclear deal do not make him any less of a participant in the above crimes. I received ‘coverage’ from a reporter from The Asian Age who was waiting to interview me, of all the candidates, after I filed my nomination from the East Delhi Lok Sabha constituency in 1996, to learn my “strategy” for winning and, after the election, the provincial head of the Congress Party showed knowledge of the fruits of that interview -- not because it was published -- and commented to me on the futility of my running since I was not known to the public. The media people who will die in the nuclear explosion that will destroy Delhi/New Delhi will include both those who are known and those who are unknown to the public.
Of all the PILs to the Supreme Court regarding the nuclear deal, only mine had asked for the removal from office and prosecution of Manmohan Singh for treason and violation of his oath of office by failing to uphold India’s sovereignty and the Supreme Court has failed to act on my PIL (I have pointed out in addendums below that whereas the Supreme Court has dismissed various PILs regarding the nuclear deal on various grounds, it cannot dismiss mine because my PIL points to violations of specific provisions of the Constitution by specific acts by a specific individual and seeks a specific remedy; so it has simply failed to act on mine). In doing so, the Supreme Court is also participating in the cover up of the above crimes against India’s greatest scientist and the greatest Indian of all time that were pointed to in the PIL and is, thus, participating in those crimes. The loyalty of the judiciary, no less than that of the military and the civil servants, has always been to the firangi and the judiciary in all its aspects -- from robes and language to the enforcement of British-made laws -- is a flagrant continuation of firangi rule over India. The nuclear bomb explosion in New Delhi/Delhi that will destroy firangi rule over India will destroy the Supreme Court also.
The criminals of the Supreme Court, loyal as they are to the firangis (above), could not give a hoot for India’s sovereignty and they show it in their behaviour. India’s Parliament, from the Speaker to individual MPs, has also shown its indifference to India’s sovereignty. The surrender of India’s sovereignty by the Executive is known to everyone. India’s sovereignty rests only in me. I am India’s sovereign.
Indians as a rule are inferior Indian niggers unfit to talk about strategic matters, especially when it involves the White Master in any way, which it always does. That is why in his only reference to India in his 'Mein Kampf', Adolf Hitler said "As for India, I would rather see India under the British than under any one else". It is not just that a handful of the British from half way around the world ruled India for centuries; a lot of other people did that from various countries for a thousand years.
A modern day Babar will start each day by killing a million Indians before breakfast every morning, though some think three million will be better (this number can be herded into fairly small extermination circles and then a neutron bomb exploded over them).
I am an Indian, but as far above the other Indians as an avatar is above ordinary mortals.
EXPANDED ADDENDUM DATED AUGUST 5, 2008: With Firangi-Enslaved Indians, Argument Is Of No Avail:
In a country such as North Korea, firangi-watchers and firangi-hunters could ensure that no firangi can subvert any institutions or individuals in their country. But then the firangis enforce/threaten to enforce their control over their country by military force/invasion. IAEA inspections are always backed up by military force/invasions by the firangis. In India, the military and civil servants have always been loyal to the firangis, as I showed in my addendum dated July 25 ‘08 below. In addition, as I said in the same addendum, “No one in Delhi/New Delhi wants nuclear supremacy for India” and thus the entire population of Delhi/New Delhi consists of traitors. That is why killing off the politicians, the military, the civil servants and the rest of the population of Delhi/New Delhi with a nuclear bomb is necessary to save India as a whole; the ban against the firangis can then be enforced in the rest of India till India has ten thousand nuclear warheads and can kill off the entire population of the most powerful firangi country.
Like the recent bomb blasts in Bangalore and Ahmedabad and the firing along the Line of Control in J & K, the Amarnath land row, “the worst communal flare-up … since 1947” (Hindustan Times), has been instigated by C.I.A.-RAW to take attention away from the firangi enemy and his invasion of India with the IAEA inspections, etc. -- just as the communal riots in 1947 were instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which, as I have said, remained loyal to the British after 1947, so the stupid Indians killed one another by the millions while keeping the top firangi, Mountbatten, Governor General of “independent” India. As I have repeatedly said below “Nothing that can be said about the stupidity and slavishness of Indians will be an exaggeration”. But, with a nuclear bomb killing a few million of these stupid Indians in Delhi/New Delhi, India as a whole can be saved.
FURTHER ADDED ON AUGUST 4, 2008: I am reproducing below my two most recent articles sent to merinews.com. One of them was published with alterations which, though serious -- for example, the title was changed from “No IAEA Inspections Will [emphasis added] Be Allowed In India” to “IAEA inspections should not be allowed in India”, totally altering the central message of the article -- were nowhere near what C.I.A.-RAW did to my second article which, as published, had no resemblance to my views. When, in a comment on the second article, I referred to the first article, C.I.A.-RAW deleted the first article. The two articles, as I sent them, are as follows (where there are references to my other articles, they can be found in the addendums below):-
(Sent on August 4, 2008) National Security: Ridding India of Firangis & Their Agents
Internal security is a necessary component of national security. For India, internal security requires the following:
1) Citizen inspectors should constantly inspect all nuclear facilities, particularly those included in the ‘civilian list’ for IAEA inspections, for any signs of inspections by firangis or their agents brought in the past or future, by stealth or otherwise, to ensure that no IAEA inspections take place (see my article ‘No IAEA Inspections Will Be Allowed In India‘, below).2) No firangi should be allowed on the streets of Indian cities or elsewhere unless accompanied by firangi-watchers and firangi-hunters and can satisfy the latter that he/she is going for some legitimate purpose -- such as buying food -- and will not engage in activities to infiltrate/subvert Indian institutions or individuals in any way by engaging in conversations or other interactions/associations that are not legitimate such as asking the price of a food item he/she wants to buy.3) Any Indian found associating with firangis in any way should be beaten to death on the spot.
The nuclear deal, of which the IAEA inspections are a part, is being IMPOSED on India -- the control of politicians and others by bribery, etc., is also a part of the imposition though the ultimate threat of military action is its foundation -- and this imposition is a manifestation of India's state of subjugation to the firangi which has other aspects -- such as sending 80,000 postgraduate students to the United States every year, making no serious effort to educate them in India, putting half a million engineers and others on the payroll, directly or indirectly, of the United States every year, so they join the millions other Indians, military and non-military, on British payrolls willing to give their lives for their British masters and now are willing to give their lives for their American masters. The opposition to the nuclear deal is founded on an opposition to subjugation to the firangi, which requires demanding strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States. Not demanding nuclear supremacy over the United States leaves India open to the nuclear deal and other things being IMPOSED on a subjugated India, subjugated by killing uncounted millions in the past and the subjugation maintained by the threat of killing even more in the future. The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh) said: "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:..." As I have shown, the killings and the subjugation continued right up to 1947. The ability of the Americans to kill and subjugate is incomparably greater than that of the British and India is faced with an even deeper slavery to the Americans with the nuclear deal which, as I have said, is a multi-pronged invasion of India. One does not need to refer to the holocaust beginning 1857 to know the incomparably greater American threat and its consequences. Attaining strategic nuclear supremacy over the firangi and using this supremacy to eliminate this incomparably greater threat is India's real War of Independence
Weapons are the foundation of sovereignty. Adopting strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States as a national objective -- which is the operative part of sovereignty, rejecting subjugation to the firangi -- automatically makes the nuclear deal untenable and unthinkable. Without adopting nuclear supremacy over the United States as a national objective, the nuclear deal also will continue to be IMPOSED on India by various methods. Adopting strategic nuclear supremacy as a national objective not only wards off the nuclear deal and frees India from subjugation to the firangi but also opens the floodgates to prosperity and achievement in every sphere that a billion-plus people are capable of (see my articles ‘How India‘s Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year Or More‘ and ‘A Magical Solution To India‘s And The World‘s Economic Problems‘ in the addendum dated July 30, 2008, below). Unlike the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, India's nuclear supremacy will be directed at eliminating the threat, because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy. The threat must die for India to live. A single-minded pursuit of strategic nuclear supremacy is required for this. The firangi and his Indian agents subvert and obstruct this. The three steps for India’s internal security listed above are necessary to deal with the subversion and obstruction.
(Sent on August 2, 2008) No IAEA Inspections Will Be Allowed In India
The illegitimate, traitor ‘government’ in New Delhi cannot enter into any IAEA agreements for India. No IAEA inspections of any Indian facilities, beyond those that were under such inspections on January 1, 2006, will be allowed. Even those facilities that were under IAEA inspections on January 1, 2006 may, in fact will, be withdrawn from such inspections.
The traitors of the B.J.P. responded to my reference to the firangi control of India’s media (see addendum dated August 1, 2008, ’Suppression By The Media’, below) by trying to divert attention away from the firangi enemy -- and the firangis’ invasion of India in the form of the IAEA inspections -- and direct it toward other Indians (which is what Bangladeshis, like other muslims of the subcontinent, are); a B.J.P. spokesman referred to Bangladeshi “infiltration”, never mind the firangis’ invasion of India’s nuclear program and infiltration -- which in fact is almost total control -- of Indian media, government, politicians, etc. The nuclear bomb that will destroy New Delhi will destroy the B.J.P. traitors as surely as any other (see my article ‘Imminent End of Firangi Rule Over India‘ in addendums below).
As I have said (see my article ‘Objections to the Nuclear Deal’ in addendum dated July 19, 2008 below) getting India's nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, whether or not India imports American reactors, has been a prime American goal because at least 75% of the damage to India's nuclear program would have been done once the facilities are placed under IAEA inspections, even if nothing further is done and no nuclear deal with the United States is finally signed and no foreign reactors, from the United States or from Russia or France, are bought. Any move to put Indian nuclear facilities under IAEA inspections, beyond the ones under IAEA inspections at present, is a grave injury to the nation and an invasion of India like the American invasion of Iraq and deserves a response appropriate to an invasion.
A country that has ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States cannot be restricted from importing, without IAEA inspections, etc., however much uranium it wants from wherever it wants by the United States or any other power; the power of nuclear weapons is what India needs; electricity can be produced in numerous other ways for the time being. Agreeing to even talks on new inspections with the IAEA -- an instrument of American imperialism -- are acts of treason and deserve commensurately severe punishment. Nuclear supremacy over the United States has to be India’s national objective and its one point agenda (see my article ‘Why Nuclear Supremacy?’ in addendums below). The IAEA inspections are totally incompatible with nuclear supremacy over the United States and deserve to be summarily rejected without going into any details.
The assault on India's nuclear program, of which the IAEA inspections are the central part, is the present day version of a foreign invasion. Military supremacy over an invader is not optional but essential for survival. Military supremacy today means nuclear supremacy. But "nuclear supremacy" or "strategic nuclear supremacy" for India is not even mentioned by Indian politicians, press, ‘strategic experts‘, etc., infiltrated and controlled as they are by the firangi enemy. As I have said, many Iraqi generals were bought up by Americans in the course of their 2003 invasion but it did not make it any less of an invasion and the invasion was expressly called an invasion on Iraq's nuclear program. The fact that many Indian politicians and others have been bought up does not make this any less of an invasion. This is a war for survival and for independence and requires the energy, speed, commitment and a full spectrum mobilisation appropriate to a war.
PRESS RELEASE: August 4, 2008 C.I.A.-RAW Mischief In The Media:
The following are four of my comments after merinews posted my article on India's internal security after grossly altering it, totally misrepresenting my views:-My first comment :
The article, as published here, has been heavily edited and all of the most important points have been obscured or eliminated; the points in my article as I sent it can be seen in my blog titled 'India's Nuclear Supremacy Over The United States' which can be found by doing a Google search with the words: nuclear supremacy India Satish
My second comment:
The article as published here does NOT represent my views. I have said no IAEA inspections should be allowed and citizen inspectors should constantly inspect Indian nuclear facilities for any signs of IAEA inspections. The points about internal security in my article as I sent it were as follows:- National Security: Ridding India Of Firangis & Their Agents: For internal security: 1) Citizen inspectors should constantly inspect all nuclear facilities, particularly those included in the ‘civilian list’ for IAEA inspections, for any signs of inspections by firangis or their agents brought in the past or future, by stealth or otherwise, to ensure that no IAEA inspections take place. 2) No firangi should be allowed on the streets of Indian cities or elsewhere unless accompanied by firangi-watchers and firangi-hunters and can satisfy the latter that he/she is going for some legitimate purpose -- such as buying food -- and will not engage in activities to infiltrate/subvert Indian institutions or individuals in any way by engaging in conversations or other interactions/associations that are not legitimate such as asking the price of a food item he/she wants to buy. 3) Any Indian found associating with firangis in any way should be beaten to death on the spot. Satish Chandra My third comment:
I also notice that my article which merinews had earlier published under the heading 'IAEA inspections should not be allowed in India' has been deleted. As I have said, CIA-RAW control the Indian media and, besides posting a lot of abusive comments on my other aricles, they have been altering and deleting my articles and decide which of my articles will be published. For my views on the subject, see the addendums below.
(I have found that C.I.A.-RAW can also make my articles/blogs on sulekha.com disappear at will and make articles/blogs by me disappear from Google searches. A list of my articles someone posted on Bharat-Rakshak.com was deleted by C.I.A.-RAW operatives who control that forum. These are just some of their acts within the past 24 hours.)My fourth comment:I have sent the following letter to the editors of merinews:
I find that the article I sent you under the heading 'Ridding India Of Firangis & Their Agents' has been published after altering it so that it seriously misrepresents my views; also, that my article which you earlier published under the heading 'IAEA inspections should not be allowed in India' has been deleted without any explanation, further adding to the misrepresentation of my views. I demand an immediate explanation and retraction. You have the right to decide which articles to publish but NOT to misrepresent my views by grossly altering them. Satish Chandra
PRESS RELEASE: August 2, 2008 National Security: Ridding India Of Firangis & Their Agents
FURTHER ADDED AUGUST 2, 2008: National Security: Ridding India Of Firangis & Their Agents:
For internal security:
1) Citizen inspectors should constantly inspect all nuclear facilities, particularly those included in the ‘civilian list’ for IAEA inspections, for any signs of inspections by firangis or their agents brought in the past or future, by stealth or otherwise, to ensure that no IAEA inspections take place.
2) No firangi should be allowed on the streets of Indian cities or elsewhere unless accompanied by firangi-watchers and firangi-hunters and can satisfy the latter that he/she is going for some legitimate purpose -- such as buying food -- and will not engage in activities to infiltrate/subvert Indian institutions or individuals in any way by engaging in conversations or other interactions/associations that are not legitimate such as asking the price of a food item he/she wants to buy.
3) Any Indian found associating with firangis in any way should be beaten to death on the spot.
Satish Chandra
PRESS RELEASE: August 2, 2008 No IAEA Inspections Will Be Allowed In India:
ADDED AUGUST 2, 2008: No IAEA Inspections Will be Allowed In India:
The illegitimate, traitor ‘government’ in New Delhi cannot enter into any IAEA agreements for India. No IAEA inspections of any Indian facilities, beyond those that were under such inspections on January 1, 2006, will be allowed. Even those facilities that were under IAEA inspections on January 1, 2006 may, in fact will, be withdrawn from such inspections.
The traitors of the B.J.P. responded to my reference to the firangi control of India’s media (see my article ’Suppression By the Media’ in addendum dated August 1, 2008) by trying to divert attention away from the firangi enemy -- and the firangis’ invasion of India in the form of the IAEA inspections -- and direct it toward other Indians (which is what Bangladeshis, like other muslims of the subcontinent, are); a B.J.P. spokesman referred to Bangladeshi “infiltration”, never mind the firangis’ invasion of India’s nuclear program and infiltration -- which in fact is almost total control -- of Indian media, government, politicians, etc. The nuclear bomb that will destroy New Delhi will destroy the B.J.P. traitors as surely as any other (see my article ‘Imminent end of Firangi Rule Over India‘ in addendum dated July 19, 2008).
As I have said (see my article ‘Objections to the Nuclear Deal’ in addendum dated July 19, 2008) getting India's nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, whether or not India imports American reactors, has been a prime American goal because at least 75% of the damage to India's nuclear program would have been done once the facilities are placed under IAEA inspections, even if nothing further is done and no nuclear deal with the United States is finally signed and no foreign reactors, from the United States or from Russia or France, are bought. Any move to put Indian nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, beyond the ones under IAEA inspections at present, is a grave injury to the nation and an invasion of India like the American invasion of Iraq and deserves a response appropriate to an invasion.
A country that has ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States cannot be restricted from importing, without IAEA inspections, etc., however much uranium it wants from wherever it wants by the United States or any other power; the power of nuclear weapons is what India needs; electricity can be produced in numerous other ways for the time being. Agreeing to even talks on new inspections with the IAEA -- an instrument of American imperialism -- are acts of treason and deserve commensurately severe punishment. Nuclear supremacy over the United States has to be India’s national objective and its one point agenda (see my article ‘Why Nuclear Supremacy?’ in addendum dated July 19, 2008). The IAEA inspections are totally incompatible with nuclear supremacy over the United States and deserve to be summarily rejected without going into any details.
The assault on India's nuclear program, of which the IAEA inspections are the central part, is the present day version of a foreign invasion. Military supremacy over an invader is not optional but essential for survival. Military supremacy today means nuclear supremacy. But "nuclear supremacy" or "strategic nuclear supremacy" for India is not even mentioned by Indian politicians, press, ‘strategic experts‘, etc., infiltrated and controlled as they are by the firangi enemy. As I have said, many Iraqi generals were bought up by Americans in the course of their 2003 invasion but it did not make it any less of an invasion and the invasion was expressly called an invasion on Iraq's nuclear program. The fact that many Indian politicians and others have been bought up does not make this any less of an invasion. This is a war for survival and for independence and requires the energy, speed, commitment and a full spectrum mobilisation appropriate to a war.
Satish Chandra
ADDED AUGUST 1, 2008: Suppression By The Media:
1) As a boy, I used to devour the publications of Gita Press, Gorakhpur. On looking up its web site today, I found that not only are all the things I read -- even the special annual issues of Kalyan, each as thick as the Ramayan or Mahabharat, such as the Nari Ank, which came out in 1948 and which I remember reading through more than once as if it was 5 years ago, still available, at prices that are stunning, it even runs a Vedic school where the brahmacharis are "taught parts of the Vedas, Sanskrit, Hindi, English and modern secular subjects. Presently, a nominal monthly fee of Rs.300 is charged for boarding, lodging, education, clothes and medicine." India needs a million such schools. I wonder if they follow the oral tradition of memorising the Vedas and other works. I am sure they do; it wouldn't be a Vedic school otherwise. For advantages of the oral tradition, see my article 'A Harvard Sophomore's Plagiarism & B. F. Skinner's' below which also describes the different treatments of their plagiarism by the media.
2) The B. J. P. says it is going to boycott a firangi-controlled TV news channel for suppressing the video recording of members of parliament being bought by the firangis through their Indian agents. But all Indian media are controlled by the firangis, except perhaps the Gita Press, Gorakhpur. What I said below bears repeating:
The refusal by pieces of filth such as Advani to recognise the United States as India's number one enemy is sustained by thousands of C.I.A.-RAW-inspired headlines in India's media such as "Indian-American becomes Governor of Louisiana" which should instead say "Indian rewarded for conversion to Christianity with governorship: As reward for conversion to Christianity at age 18, as Americans themselves admit and his numerous published essays and articles on his conversion, Indian made Secretary of Louisiana's Health and Hospitals at age 24, President of the University of Louisiana system at age 27, then Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services in Bush Administration, then member of U.S. Congress and now youngest Governor in U.S. at age 36" ( http://cenlamar.wordpress.com/about-cenlamar/lamediawatch/bobby-jindal-the-story-they-dont-want-you-to-read ). Even more important are the thousands of headlines that are missing from India's media, thanks to C.I.A.-RAW, the story they really don't want anyone to know, saying "India's greatest scientist and greatest living Indian publicly tortured in Harvard seminar, systematically and totally starved for up to 3 weeks at a time, made semi-starved and homeless and even blind for years, kept under 24-hour audio and video surveillance as well as surveillance of communications and electrical typewriter and computer use, document creation and photocopying, etc., by satellite for more than past 3 decades, systematically harassed, kept in forced poverty and ‘neutralized’ and robbed of his work at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars per year, robbed of crores in his money and property in India by C.I.A.-RAW, forced back into exile in the U.S., all with full cooperation and participation of India's RAW and India's C.I.A.-RAW-controlled prime ministers, politicians and media -- to keep India poor, weak and enslaved: The most intelligent, most handsome man on Earth, a living Incarnation, plans nuclear supremacy for India in near future, to destroy India's number one enemy, the United States, with ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles and will machine gun and bulldoze into trenches all traitors who stand in the way."
Since then I have said that, instead of being machine-gunned and bull-dozed into trenches, the traitors in New Delhi will be eliminated with a single nuclear bomb explosion.
FURTHER ADDED ON JULY 30, 2008: Relevant to what is said in the addendum below are some comments I made on my article (‘How India’s economy can grow 30% per year’) on merinews.com; note that the Indian government’s recent brave stance in WTO negotiations has been prompted by what I said about exports and imports in one of my comments reproduced below; CIA-RAW continue to steal my work while committing the most heinous crimes against me:-
My first comment on my own article on merinews.com:
A fragment from my blog (since the ignoramus -- though, in fairness, he may be no more ignorant than economists in general -- below referred to 'devaluing the currency' ) : "When an American psychologist was given the Nobel Prize in Economics a couple of years ago, I pointed out that his work had not the millionth part of the significance my work has for Economics. ... "Balance between exchange rates and inflation"? Exchange rates are irrelevant for an economy which grows on money printed and invested by the government and inflation is not a problem when the production of goods and services keeps pace with the money supply. "Rational tax system"? Taxes are not needed and are an irrational holdover from the past when a government can print all the money it wants. All the so-called 'macroeconomic issues' are simply swept away and become irrelevant when you implement my proposal about money. " I have also shown that a crore of goods and services sold domestically is worth several crores of goods and services sold abroad, so far as the effect on India's prosperity is concerned. An economy the size of India has no need to either export or import for prosperity, though it may still do so for various reasons, including using exports and imports as a geopolitical tool. The best use for the brainless and impertinent person who posted below that I can think of is grinding him up -- along with other economists, if he is one -- for use as fertiliser, to grow onions, stinking onions. Or he can be made into canned dogfood and exported to earn foreign exchange; as I said in a column which appeared in Indian Express more than a decade ago, that is about all the foreign exchange India really needs.
My second comment on my own article on merinews.com:
Continuing with what I said below: The author is the world's greatest behavior scientist -- acknowledged in those terms -- and a science of behavior is the foundation science all social sciences, including Economics. As he has shown elsewhere, economists are absolutely the most clueless people he has even encountered -- who rely on ad hoc, half baked theories of behavior -- and a basic science of behavior provides much more powerful tools. But beyond the inadequacies of their theories of behavior, I have shown how they are unable to reason in any kind of a productive way.
My third comment on my own article on merinews.com:
The poster below is brainless and knows nothing of Economics. The money printed under my proposal about money will be used as investment so that the production of goods and services increases right along with the money supply. Foreign investment is neither needed nor desirable when you have an unlimited amount of investment capital available by simply printing the money. All the issues -- inflation, etc. -- have been dealt with in my blog ( which can be found by doing a Google search with the words: India nuclear supremacy Satish )and elsewhere and can only be touched upon in a short article like this. This poster should read, study and absorb what is said here and in the blog before he comments on my proposal about money, though being a functional illiterate may make that impossible for him. My proposal about money is the greatest development in social science -- greater than Marx or Freud -- and, arguably, the greatest development in human history. Its author is India's greatest scientist -- look up his bio in Who's Who In America and Who's Who In the World -- and as far above the poster below as the poster below may be above a cockroach. As even this article notes, both the United States government and the Indian government had proceeded to implement my proposal about money by stealth.
My fourth comment on my own article on merinews.com:
As I have said in my blog, ignorant and enslaved 'inferior Indian n i g g e r s' like the one commenting below are the rule rather than the exception in India but India can surpass the United States both militarily and in economic strength despite such people.
My fifth comment on my own article on merinews.com:
As I pointed out in my letter dated September 6, 2001 in thecurrentonline, the Cabinet Committee on Economic Strategy that was formed by the Vajpayee government to steal my proposal about money was separate from the already existing Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs. My letter sequence, which appeared in thecurrentonline under the editors' title "Terrorism", can be retrieved by entering my name in the search box on the newspaper's web site.
ADDED JULY 30, 2008: After the Destruction of New Delhi:
I have said that after the destruction of New Delhi, India’s government will be in Hyderabad and its contact number will be the telephone number of DRDO. As I have said, a skeletal staff of just a few dozen, based in Hyderabad, can perform the functions of the Central government -- giving instructions to and answering questions from the state governments and other entities and providing them with funds in accordance with my proposal about money outlined in my article, ’How India’s Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year Or More’ below. Further elaborations are in an article ‘A magical Solution To India’s And The World’s Economic Problems‘; these two articles together are being reproduced below (I have dealt with many other ancillary issues related to my proposal about money in letters and articles to the press over the past dozen years but these two articles address the major issues):-
1) How India's Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year Or More
Suppose a government wishes to increase the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by twenty, thirty or forty percent in a given year over and above, say, a seven percent increase that is expected. All it has to do is print and spend an additional amount, equal to twenty, thirty or forty percent of the GDP, in that year on productive purposes. By definition, the GDP would have increased by an additional twenty, thirty or forty percent that year (not counting the multiplier effect, referred to my letters to the press, which will depend on how the money is spent). Printing the money takes no creativity, thinking up productive purposes to spend it on does not take much either. The money can be spent directly by the government, through private parties or both ways though, of course, by spending the money directly, the government does not have to wait for private parties to come up with proposals. The important thing is that how much the GDP grows next year-- seven percent or twenty seven percent or more-- is strictly in the government's own hands. Terms such as "deficits" (there are no deficits when all the money a government spends is printed by it; if the government does take in money as taxes or charges, the effects of deficits on interest rates occur only if the government borrows the additional money, not if it prints it) and "overheating" of the economy are worthless concepts which only serve to maintain the status quo in which various people have a vested interest. As I wrote some years ago, "people get pleasure from the pain and deprivation of others and [reference to a head of government], who is no exception, will not want [a change]". Note that the recommendation above is to print and spend an amount equal to twenty, thirty or forty percent of the GDP IN ADDITION TO whatever the government was otherwise going to do by way of taxing (unnecessary as it is) and spending, etc. Since the production of goods and services, including consumer as well as capital goods, will rise right along with the additional spending, any effects of the additional spending will be benign. Even if some adverse effects are postulated, in no way can they overcome the huge advantage from a GDP growth of twenty seven percent or more over seven percent in a year. During war, government spending on equipment and supplies (guns and bullets, etc.) can suddenly increase ten, twenty or fifty times. During World War II, the United States government put in place price controls (under J. K. Galbraith) to curb the inflationary effect of such spending (since production capacity was diverted to war equipment and supplies from consumer items). (It was the enormous increase in U. S. government spending during World War II that gave rise to its 'National Debt'). A similarly sudden and large increase in government spending in peace time on the production of food, clothing, shelter, transportation, etc., for the citizenry will not result in the kind of price rise the United States expected in World War II, because the production of consumer goods and services will increase along with the money supply-- even if a lot of the additional spending is directed to military purposes. In any case, price controls can be used in peace time, if necessary, as in war time. The United States, sitting on top of the world economically and militarily, may not feel any need to increase its GDP by twenty seven percent or more in a year. For governments of countries such as India, not to do that is treasonous as well as stupid. With a growth rate of twenty seven percent per year, a country's GDP will double every three years. India's per capita income will equal that of the United States in fifteen years (the development and implementation of environment-protection technologies will be a part of the expenditure program) and Russia's in six years. And this will not depend on the vagaries of markets (in no way can markets bring this about) but, as pointed out above, will be strictly in a government's own hands. 'Oligarchs' (there are a lot of oligarchs in India but the masses remain impoverished) can never equal a government's ability to print money and, in any case, a government has to be a dispenser of justice as well as money (often justice equals money). All the advantages of motivation, etc., ascribed to 'free enterprise' are also available to a government, as I have pointed out. Apart from standards of living, there are military and geo-strategic consequences and the ever-increasing despotism of the United States means that this has to be done on a war footing. India's government does not do it because several of India's prime ministers (Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee) have been on the payroll of the C.I.A. and its real 'government', the Research and Analysis Wing, functions as a branch of the C.I.A. (see my article 'India's Technological and Economic Emancipation'). But what about a country such as Russia? Here another factor needs to be considered. American press reports 3-4 years ago referred to satellite-based technology the United States has had in place to monitor "the conversations of foreign leaders" (not just conversations over the telephone or other electrical/electronic media though it includes ability to monitor electrical/electronic communications of all kinds also). Since at least 1977, the United States has been able to keep individuals under 24-hour video and audio surveillance by satellite. Psychologist B. F. Skinner of Harvard made no secret of "my spies" keeping me under such surveillance, one use of which is a C.I.A. program started by Skinner to "control" a targeted individual's behavior by various verbal (including the use of conditioned stimuli, ratio schedules, etc.) and other means. I was targeted primarily due to Skinner's personal motivation flowing from the fact that I had exposed his plagiarism and destroyed his school of psychology (see my article 'A Harvard Sophomore's Plagiarism and B. F. Skinner's') but also because I have been the only threat to the United States' ability to keep India economically, technologically and militarily weak and under its boots (in part through my 'influence' on Prime Minister Indira Gandhi --about which Skinner asked "How about your political contacts on either side-- Mrs. Gandhi?" though I had not breathed a word about any such 'contacts' -- and former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi-- both of whom were assassinated for this reason by India's Research and Analysis Wing on the C.I.A.'s orders). But it would have been surprising if the United States had not used such surveillance and control over other foreign leaders. An article in a Russian newspaper by an American capitalist consultant on Russia a couple of months ago referred to "the mysteriously self-destructive behavior" of Russia's leaders, referring to the dismantling of the benefits system (the same system of benefits can be administered by private contractors, if desired, who will be paid by the government and those who got free transportation before can still get free transportation), but such behavior started in the mid-eighties, with Mikhail Gorbachev. It is more than likely that similar surveillance and control has been used against Soviet/Russian leaders. It is noteworthy that both the United States government and the Indian government had proceeded to implement my proposal about money, as I have described in letters dated August 1, 2001, September 6, 2001 and April 13, 2001 (also letters about stock market manipulation by the U.S. Treasury Department by pumping money into the stock market; Bush made a trip through an underground tunnel from the White House to the Treasury Department to see the set up created for such manipulation) that appeared in the American online newspaper thecurrentonline: http://www.thecurrentonline.com/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1
The Vajpayee government set up a separate Cabinet Committee on Economic Strategy -- separate from the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs which already existed -- for the purpose of stealing my proposal about money. When I pointed out that they were trying to STEAL my proposal about money, they stopped implementing it.
I have said below and in letters to the press in 1998 and subsequently that the firangis gave the Nobel prize in Economics to the mediocre Indian named Amartya Sen as a substitute for the Nobel prize for me since they would not let their crimes against me, committed in collaboration with India’s RAW and India’s prime ministers, be exposed. When Clinton, as president, held a White House conference on the “New Economy”, the “New Economy” was the economy that my proposal about money leads to; of all the dozens of Nobel prize winners in Economics, he invited Amartya Sen to the conference -- though Sen had absolutely nothing to do with the “New Economy” -- because he is their mediocre Indian substitute for the greatest Indian of all time they have been committing crimes against. When Amartya Sen was given the Nobel prize, Vajpayee left New Delhi for several days to avoid meeting him, because he knew Sen was the firangis’ dummy substitute to cover their crimes against me, but RAW kept Sen waiting in New Delhi several days till Vajpayee yielded and gave him all the honours CIA-RAW wanted him to receive as a substitute for me.
2) A Magical Solution To India's & the World's Economic Problems
At the time of the 'supercyclone' that hit India in Orissa about nine years ago, I pointed out that the more money the Indian government prints and spends on relief, the more the Indian economy will benefit ( see my proposal about money in my article ‘How India‘s Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year Or More‘ above), because the amount so spent will increase the Gross Domestic Product by several times that amount. So long as the money so spent is used for productive purposes-- on both goods and services-- and is not taken from money earmarked for other purposes but is additional money printed by the government, the more money the government prints and spends, the better for India. Instead of a thousand crores, the government should spend a hundred thousand crores and even more, on short term as well as long term measures. I said the same at the time of the tsunami disaster in 2004. I said India lacks neither money nor manpower-- civil or military-- to deal with this or any other problem and should reject the military "coalition" which the United States had seized the opportunity to draw India into. The death and destruction the United States has inflicted on Iraq is greater than any country has suffered from the tsunami. All countries should refuse any assistance from the United States or cooperation with it in tsunami relief or any other enterprise. In a letter to the Indian press several years ago, I pointed out that Indian Railways need not collect any fares from passengers (or freight charges) at all since the government can print all the money it needs to pay for the service, at a negligible cost (the cost of printing the money) and, in the process, greatly benefit the economy. In fact, as I have said (letter published in three parts in The Observer of Business and Politics, New Delhi, on March 11, 12 & 13, 1997), the government need not take in any money at all-- in the form of taxes, charges or borrowings-- when it can print all the money it wants. The more money the government prints and spends for goods and services, the more the economy will benefit (printing paper currency can be replaced with, say, electronic insertion of funds into accounts for certain purposes). This applies to all goods and services and all governments. On the issue of the monetization of government benefits in Russia in 2004, I said that providing benefits in kind has the advantage of ensuring that the money is used for productive purposes.
After I wrote the above, an editor in Hong Kong asked "Ever heard of inflation?" I replied that I have dealt with the issue of inflation, both in the 1997 letter cited above and elsewhere. When I said that providing benefits in kind will ensure that the funds are used for productive purposes, it also meant that it will ensure there is a corresponding increase in the production of goods and services. Inflation occurs when the production of goods and services does not keep pace with the money supply. In the 1997 letter I refer to controlling prices, if necessary. Going beyond the demand-supply mechanism involved in inflation, I have pointed to the role of "inflationary expectations" in generating inflation and what the government can do to avoid generating "inflationary expectations". For example, I have pointed to the feasibility and desirabilty of not raising railway fares even if fuel prices go up and not raising fuel prices even if the price of imported crude oil goes up-- to avoid generating "inflationary expectations". I said that India pays for imported crude oil in dollars and so its ability to import oil depends on the size of its dollar holdings. The consumers in India pay for oil products in rupees. The government need not raise the prices of oil products; it could even provide oil products -- or anything else, such as food, housing, transportation, etc., -- to the people free of charge because it can print all the money it wants and can reimburse the producers of such goods and services simply by printing the money. In the case of disaster relief, I said that the government could simply invite any and all individuals and organisations to “find a need and fill it and be reimbursed at double your cost”. I said that in normal times, a 50% profit may be incentive enough. The Indian Finance Minister now regularly uses this term “inflationary expectations” and my argument has had the effect of the government often not raising prices of oil products, railway fares, etc., when it otherwise would have. But it is far from applying the consequences of my argument consistently.After I pointed out a "multiplier effect" because of which each rupee printed and spent by the government increases the Gross Domestic Product by several rupees, the United States Department of Labor estimated that each dollar the U.S. government provides to unemployed people as unemployment compensation increases the Gross Domestic Product by more than two dollars. The multiplier effect occurs because, suppose you are building a new railway line; the suppliers of the goods and services that the government buys to build the railway line use that money to buy further goods and services (which may be inputs into the goods and services they are selling to the government such as steel, vehicles and wages to their employees who will use the money to buy other goods and services such as clothing and food or TV sets); the suppliers (of steel, vehicles, etc.) to the government‘s suppliers will use the money to buy still further goods and services, and so on; the money the government spends on building the new railway line starts off chains of economic activity that has the effect of increasing the Gross Domestic Product by several times the amount of money the government spent on building the new railway line. The same applies to money spent on disaster relief, or anything else.
ADDED JULY 29, 2008: Not Much Time Left To Destroy The Traitors In New Delhi:
The United States made a missile strike on Pakistan during Pakistan’s prime minister’s visit to the United States. A missile strike by firangis on Pakistan is a missile strike on India. The firangis’ occupation of Afghanistan is occupation of India. These are part of the firangis’ multi-pronged invasion of India of which the worst part will be bringing the IAEA inspections to India. There is not much time left to destroy the traitors in New Delhi so India can get on with the task of destroying the firangi enemy.
ADDED JULY 28, 2008: Diverting Attention From The Firangi Enemy:
I have said below that almost all terrorist incidents in India since 1983 have been carried out either by groups directly controlled by the CIA or controlled by the CIA through intelligence agencies in the region, including India’s RAW. CIA-RAW carried out the blasts in Bangalore and Ahmedabad to ‘neutralise’ what I wrote below on July 25 ‘08 and divert attention from the firangi -- in particular, the most powerful firangi country, the United States -- as India’s number one enemy and direct it toward other Indians (which is what muslims of the subcontinent are). The destruction of New Delhi by a nuclear explosion, centered on RAW headquarters, will destroy the traitors who obstruct India’s nuclear supremacy over the firangi enemy.
ADDED JULY 25, 2008: Destroying New Delhi:
Who will be destroyed by the nuclear bomb in New Delhi besides the Laloo Yadavs and Chatterjees (see below)? A bent old man who bent even lower to the Yadavs the day after he recorded the Yadavs, with bags of money, facilitating the invasion of India by firangis and was himself recorded, with folded hands, paying obeisance to the Yadavs. The military and the civil servants who have always been loyal to the firangis (see below). The population of Delhi/New Delhi which, by the hundreds of thousands, stood and watched silently India’s emperor, after surrendering his sword, arrested and led away by a lone Englishman with “fifty black sowars” -- the Englishman sent the Indian emperor’s jewel-encrusted sword to the British monarch -- though, as the Englishman wrote home to England, anyone of them -- his fifty black sowars -- could have brought him down with a single shot.
Why did the Indian emperor have to surrender his sword to the lone firangi and submit to being arrested? He had a sword but he lacked supremacy in arms. Today supremacy in arms is nuclear supremacy. No one in Delhi/New Delhi wants nuclear supremacy for India. These are the people who will be destroyed.
ADDED JULY 24, 2008: I said below that Som Nath Chatterjee is among the many, many politicians, etc., who have been bribed. This bugger could be ground up and made into fertiliser to grow onions, stinking onions! (He seemed to flee New Delhi for Hyderabad on the pretext of having a medical check up and may do so again so he may not die in the nuclear blast that will destroy New Delhi). Earlier I thought that he could be used, like Laloo Yadav -- who is lionized for teaching management to firangis while over twenty thousand passengers have died in Bombay trains in the past five years because they have to ride on roofs of trains or hang outside due to over-crowding -- for lard; I thought Laloo Yadav could be tied to the railway tracks and have an express train run over him; then his lard could be extracted and mixed with the diesel fuel in a locomotive. (Laloo Yadav got out of the fodder scam by singing in the Lok Sabha “Maiya meri main nahin makhan khayo”, making even his enemies titter and forgive him; you can’t get any makhan out of him but I thought you could get lard for locomotive fuel). There will be no forgiveness, for anyone, now. Ten thousand nuclear bombs are utterly unforgiving and so is the single nuclear bomb that will destroy New Delhi.
ADDED JULY 23, 2008: Imminent Destruction Of New Delhi With A Nuclear Bomb:
As I said below, after the destruction of New Delhi, India’s government will be in Hyderabad and its contact number will be the telephone number of DRDO. A skeletal staff of just a few dozen, based in Hyderabad, can perform the functions of the Central Government -- giving instructions to and answering questions from the State governments and other entities and providing them with funds in accordance with my proposal about money ( described below).
FURTHER ADDED ON JULY 22, 2008:
It is not just the Intelligence Bureau that continued to be loyal to the British after 1947. So did Nehru:“Starting about 10 hours before he tendered his resignation, Vajpayee, through the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, tried hard to induce the undersigned to issue a statement urging him to not resign (as I have said over the years, he, like Indira and Rajiv, has been a life-long paid agent of British and American intelligence agencies, with the Soviets providing some antidote which gave India a semblance of independence; Indira was made prime minister by the KGB's assassination of Shastri; and as Nehru admitted to U.S. ambassador Galbraith, he was a life-long agent of the British). No more than about 80,000 British, women and children included, ruled India for centuries. Nothing that can be said about the stupidity and slavishness of Indians will be an exaggeration." ( from letter dated May 15, 2004 below).In India traitors have been the rule rather than the exception. Anyone concerned with India's defence has to take account of that. India will be saved by the destruction of New Delhi with a nuclear detonation and then the destruction of the United States with ten thousand nuclear warheads.
ADDED JULY 22, 2008: To see how the nuclear deal is an operation of CIA-RAW, go to merinews.com and see the comments posted on my article ‘Nuke deal hurts India’s national objective’ :-
http://www.merinews.com/commentAll.jsp?articleID=137848
http://www.merinews.com/catFull.jsp?articleID=137848
Since the comments may be changed/deleted by CIA/RAW as has been done numerous times, they are also included in this E-Mail as attachments.
ADDED JULY 19, 2008: MAKING INDIA DEFENCELESS AGAINST AMERICAN NUCLEAR MISSILES:RAW was split off from the Intelligence Bureau which had remained loyal to the British after 1947. Later the Americans supplanted the British and RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India. Despite DRDO's emphatic statements that it does NOT need foreign collaboration for its missile defence program (see below), RAW has forced American 'collaboration' -- from Lockheed Martin -- down its throat, for example in developing the Imaging Infrared Seeker (IIR Seeker) for India's program for defence against Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs). The purpose is to bring India's defences against American ICBMs under American scrutiny and control, rendering India defenceless against American ICBMs. I had said that India's Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) will be considerably superior to the United States' and avoiding foreign 'help' was essential for India's nuclear supremacy over the United States. I have said that the nuclear blast that will destroy New Delhi (see my article 'Imminent End of Firangi Rule Over India' below) will be centered on RAW headquarters because RAW is the principal instrument of continuing white rule over India.
Imminent End of Firangi Rule Over India:
I have written (for example in my article titled ‘India’s Technological and Economic Emancipation’ below) about the continued control of Indian intelligence agencies by British and later American intelligence agencies after 1947. India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) was split off from the Intelligence Bureau which had continued after 1947 to be loyal to the British. Later the Americans supplanted the British and RAW functions as a branch of the CIA against India. As part of this relationship, CIA-RAW exercises extensive control over the Indian media and, among its various activities, engages in sabotage of indigenous research and development to keep India dependent on other countries for defence and other equipment (the nuclear deal is just another CIA-RAW operation of that kind, though of a scope and with consequences far graver than any such operation till now). An example of this is a Bharat-Rakshak discussion thread about a black box installed by the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO) in the indigenously developed Arjun tank that documented the sabotage of its engines during trials by the Army; such sabotage has been the basis of the Army's rejection, on RAW's prompting, of the Arjun tank in favour of imports (as I said in the above article, India‘s Army is the collaborator Army that helped the British rule India and, even after Independence, all its regiments and units have retained their former identities and regularly celebrate the anniversaries of their founding by the British). A CIA-RAW operative, who serves as a moderator on Bharat-Rakshak and controls the forum, recently locked away this discussion thread so that numerous posts that had appeared documenting the sabotage of the Arjun tank were covered up. The major metropolitan newspapers, on most of which CIA-RAW exercises extensive control, have made no mention of the black box -- which was like the flight data recorder in aircraft -- installed by DRDO in Arjun tanks and the shocking findings about the sabotage even though a report on this was provided to them by the Indo Asian News Service (IANS). There is across the board sabotage by various means by CIA-RAW to keep India down technologically, economically and militarily. RAW's grip over India is comparable to the old KGB's grip over the Soviet Union, with the difference that whereas the KGB worked for the good of the Soviet Union, except toward the end, RAW has always worked for its imperialist paymasters. The role of politicians in governing India is insignificant compared to that of CIA-RAW but RAW has no place in the public's consciousness or in discussions of public affairs in India.
An important point about the sabotage of Arjun is that people on the Arjun discussion thread on Bharat-Rakshak were aghast at the Army's behavior and calling for Army brass being tried for treason, etc. but it will be a mistake to stop with the Army; it is RAW which is behind such sabotage not just of Arjun but of India's interests, technological, economic and other, in a lot of areas. RAW has operatives in the Army at various levels but it is necessary to go to the root of the problem. RAW has to be destroyed and I have suggested that a brand new external intelligence agency be formed with the help of military intelligence (RAW is supposed to be India's external intelligence agency but at least 90% of its activities are within India, against India).
The destruction of RAW does not mean simply disbanding the agency and letting its employees continue their service to the CIA through other organisations, old or new, or in other roles. It is a mammoth agency with just the number of joint secretaries in the hundreds. It is India’s real ‘government’ and the politicians and civil servants largely obey its dictates. It puts the words in the mouths of cabinet ministers, etc., and determines most policies that are, erroneously, attributed to them. Any one, even a prime minister, whom CIA-RAW considers inconvenient is eliminated, if necessary by death, as I have said regarding the deaths of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and, later, Rajiv Gandhi in my article titled ‘How India‘s economy can grow 30% per year‘. Over the past many years, I have shown how almost all terrorist incidents in India since 1983 have been carried out by outfits controlled by the CIA either directly or through intelligence agencies in the region, including India’s RAW. The Jain Commision of Inquiry, which went into Rajiv Gandhi’s death, acknowledged that the LTTE, which carried out his assassination, was created and controlled by RAW. It was an open secret that MQM, in Pakistan’s Sindh province, when it was known as a terrorist organization, was a creation of RAW. But the same is true of many terrorist outfits that operate in India. Another example of RAW’s multifarious activities, that I have described in press releases, articles and letters to the press since 1987, is its spreading heroin addiction and AIDS first in India’s Northeast then elsewhere to provide the United States with a population to use as guinea pigs for AIDS vaccine development, after the CIA was assigned the task of roping in a population for this purpose. I have described how Both Rajiv Gandhi (after being blackmailed with threats of exposure of the Bofors and HDW kickbacks by Swedish and German media at the CIA‘s instigation) and Vajpayee cooperated in this. But terrorism, etc., are the least of its activities; I mentioned those only because the existence of terrorism is publicly known. Its sabotage of India’s research and development activities, of which the sabotage of the Arjun tank is just one example, is among the deadliest of its activities. The nuclear deal and its various aspects -- replacing indigenous production of uranium and reactors with imports, the capping, rollback and elimination of India’s nuclear weapons program, media control and buying up politicians, scientists, etc. for this purpose -- is just the largest and deadliest of such activities, leaving out the 24-hour satellite surveillance and all the crimes, at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars per year for the past 31 years, against India’s greatest scientist, described in my article titled ‘How India‘s economy can grow 30% per year‘. The point is that all the tens of thousands of RAW employees are guilty of the gravest treason and deserve the death penalty. So do all those -- politicians, civil servants and others -- who are willing collaborators of CIA-RAW. There are several points that need to be made regarding this.
1) DRDO are India's real warriors, not the military. In the old days, the sword-makers could make the swords, but warriors had to wield them. Even today's tanks and fighter planes need warriors to drive or fly them. But DRDO, along with the nuclear scientists and production units such as Bharat Dynamics, can make nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles and the people who do the research and development and production can also push the button to send them off to obliterate the enemy. The military muscle from nuclear-tipped ICBMs is millions of times greater than the power of tanks and fighter planes. The scientists and engineers are also the real soldiers. They should have their hand on the nuclear button, not the military or the politicians. The military simply obey the politicians and India's politicians are all traitors on the payrolls of the C.I.A. etc. The military are not needed to launch the nuclear-tipped ICBMs; that can be done by scientists and engineers pushing a button sitting at a desk. The tanks and fighter planes the military can drive/fly are insignificant and nearly worthless in the military power they provide. Since they (the military) also obey the traitor politicians and civil servants, they are worse than worthless. It is time scientists and engineers are recognised for what they are -- the true defenders and guardians of the country.
The military should obey and take orders from DRDO; the same for civil servants and politicians. This can be done by amending the Constitution; but the politicians will not agree to amending the Constitution, so it will have to be done in other ways.
2) In taking control of India’s government, the rule is: anyone in government who is not oriented toward and committed to supremacy over the United States -- the most powerful white country -- is oriented toward and committed to slavery to the United States and is a traitor deserving death. The orientation toward and commitment to supremacy over the United States must be vocal and explicit. At present India’s government -- for example all civil servants from the top to the bottom -- consists of traitors.3) Sometimes killing traitors within the country is necessary before an external enemy can be dealt with. In this nuclear age, a nuclear solution can deal with traitors within the country. A single nuclear detonation, arranged by DRDO and the nuclear scientists, centered on RAW headquarters will rid India of RAW, the traitor politicians and civil servants and the top brass of the worse than worthless military. Since there are very few DRDO and nuclear installations around New Delhi, India’s military and economic strength will not be damaged.4) There were no more than about 80,000 British, women and children included, in India at any time. This tiny nation, from half way around the world, ruled India for centuries. With a thousand year history of slavery to various foreign invaders, it is not surprising that Indians are extremely stupid in defence matters (see my article 'India's Technological and Economic Emancipation'). It is my task to educate them. But traitors, of whom there are plenty in India, cannot be educated, only shot. A nuclear detonation in New Delhi is an efficient way to get rid of the traitors. When the Soviet Union fought Hitler's armies in World War II, it took steps that resulted in the deaths of millions of its own countrymen but those steps were necessary to save the country as a whole. The destruction of New Delhi is similarly necessary to save India as a whole.
A NOTE about hate: In army training, for example in bayonet practice, you are taught to hate the enemy; it is essential if you are to survive and win. On Bharat Rakshak forum, the operatives of CIA-RAW, through the numerous anti-Muslim, anti-Pakistan threads they nurture, direct the aggression of Indians toward other Indians while they suppress any mention of the necessity to defend against the real enemy -- the ’white man’ and the most powerful ’white country’, the United States. In a letter to the press in 1998, just before Atal Behari Vajpayee assumed office as the Prime Minister of India, I wrote, referring to IK Gujral’s statement as prime minister about the necessity for Indians to inculcate the scientific spirit in themselves; about the necessity for Indians to inculcate in themselves “hatred for the white man (and woman),” to which Vajpayee replied, “hate is not on the agenda,” to which I replied that this amounted to saying “defence is not on the agenda.” The agenda remains unfulfilled. It will move ahead with the destruction of New Delhi with a nuclear detonation and will be fulfilled with the delivery of 10,000 nuclear warheads to the United States.
It needs to be emphasised that even today the range of India’s Agni III missile is more than three times its stated range; with a one tonne (1,000 kilogram) thrown weight (this includes warheads, decoys, release and guidance mechanisms for warheads, etc), its range is over 10,000 kilometres (see the missile section of Bharat-Rakshak.com ); with light weight thermonuclear warheads -- India’s strategic warheads are supposed to weigh from 100 to 250kilograms -- it can hit any point on earth. Its range during the recent test was deliberately reduced by various means such as a large throw weight (one and a half tonnes), using an angle of flight that reduces range, in-flight braking, etc. Even without the enhancements already developed or soon to be available, India can hit any point on the territory of the United States with its nuclear armed missiles. The industrial facilities for their mass production are already in place. The scientists have done all this despite the obstacles created by the traitor politicians. A lot more testing of both missiles and warheads -- the missiles should be tested to their full ranges and the warheads to their full yields -- is a must but the politicians have been blocking this.
The Centre for Advanced Technology (CAT) near Indore was created at the same time as the integrated guided missiles programme, as an integral part of India’s strategic programme; both were created in response to the same letter of mine to late Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December, 1982. If it has been dismantled -- partly or otherwise -- under the United States’ dictates, that is an extremely serious matter.
Defence Research and Development Organisation’s (DRDO) critical laboratories and facilities are already far away from New Delhi; whatever is in or around New Delhi should also be shifted far away and the headquarters should be in Hyderabad. What is in New Delhi is mostly bureaucratic paperwork; there may not be time to move that out before New Delhi’s destruction nor is it necessary. People can be out and far away in a matter of hours.
After the destruction of New Delhi, India’s government will be in Hyderabad and its contact number will be the telephone number of DRDO. As I have said, a skeletal staff of just a few dozen, based in Hyderabad, can perform the functions of the Central government -- giving instructions to and answering questions from the state governments and other entities and providing them with funds in accordance with my proposal about money (see my article, ’How India’s Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year Or More’).
The following are some earlier articles:-
I) What Is Nuclear Supremacy?
II) Why Nuclear Supremacy?
III) Objections to the Nuclear Deal
IV) Nuclear Deal -- An Invasion of India In Progress
V) India’s Technological and Economic Emancipation
VI) How India’s Economy can Grow 30% Per Year Or More
VII) A Harvard Sophomore’s Plagiarism & B. F. Skinner’s
I) What Is Nuclear Supremacy?
I have been advocating nuclear supremacy for India over the United States. First I will explain what is meant by nuclear supremacy.
During the Cold War, the US and the Soviet Union were said to be in a relationship of ’Mutual Assured Destruction’ (MAD), meaning if either side launched a first nuclear strike on the other to destroy the other’s nuclear weapons, cities, etc, the other side will have enough nuclear weapons to survive the first strike to obliterate the side which launched the first strike. The purpose of the anti-ballistic missile treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union was to preserve this state of mutual assured destruction, so that neither side will have an incentive to launch a first strike on the other.
A few years ago, the US unilaterally got out of the anti-ballistic missile treaty and started developing systems to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles. An article in Foreign Affairs magazine about a year ago said that America is now close to nuclear supremacy over Russia, or already has nuclear supremacy, because it can now launch a first strike against Russia and destroy all its nuclear weapons or its ability to launch them because of a severe degradation in the number and readiness of Russia’s nuclear weapons after the disintegration of the Soviet Union and thus destroy Russia with a first strike without being destroyed in return.
India’s Defence Reseach and Development Organisation (DRDO) scientists have said that the systems to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles (of short and medium range), which they recently tested, are superior to the US and within three years they will have systems to shoot down ballistic missiles of intercontinental range (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles, or ICBMs) such as the ICBMs posessed by the US (the United States does not and will not have the ability to destroy large numbers of incoming ICBMs).
By saying that India will have nuclear supremacy over the United States, I am saying that India will be able to launch a first strike against the United States and destroy it without being destroyed in return.
For the financial side regarding India’s ability to attain nuclear supremacy over the United States, see my articles ’Technological and Economic Emancipation of India’ and ‘How India’s Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year’.
For the US, striving for nuclear supremacy over all nations of the world is an axiom of its foreign policy. An example of its determination to prevent India from emerging out of slavery is in the following report from ’The Guardian’, dated January 22, 2008 where a former chairman of the United States’ joint chiefs of staff and others talk of a nuclear strike on India (without actually naming it) to keep it in a state of slavery:-"The West must be ready to resort to a pre-emptive nuclear attack to try to halt the imminent spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, according to a radical manifesto for a new North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO0 by five of the West’s most senior military officers and strategists."Calling for root-and-branch reform of NATO and a new pact drawing the US, NATO and the European Union together in a grand strategy to tackle the challenges of an increasingly brutal world, the former armed forces chiefs from the US, Britain, Germany, France and the Netherlands insist that a first strike nuclear option remains an indispensable instrument since there is simply no realistic prospect of a nuclear-free world.
"The manifesto has been written following discussions with active commanders and policymakers, many of whom are unable or unwilling to publicly air their views. It has been presented to the Pentagon in Washington and to NATO’s secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer.
"The risk of further (nuclear) proliferation is imminent and, with it, the danger of a nuclear war, albeit limited in scope, might become possible," the authors argued in the 150-page blueprint for urgent reform of Western military strategy and structures. "The first use of nuclear weapons must remain in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction.
"The authors -General John Shalikashvili, the former chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff and NATO’s ex-supreme commander in Europe, General Klaus Naumann, Germany’s former top soldier and ex-chairman of NATO’s military committee,General Henk van den Breemen, a former Dutch chief of staff, Admiral Jacques Lanxade, a former French chief of staff, and Lord Inge, field marshal and ex-chief of the general staff and the defence staff in the United Kingdom (UK) - paint an alarming picture of the threats and challenges confronting the West in the post-9/11 world and deliver a withering verdict on the ability to cope."What if the US makes the first nuclear strike on India well before India has developed a first strike capability against it - such as making a nuclear strike on India this year? Such ’counter-proliferation’ nuclear strikes have been part of the US policy for many years and there is nothing really new in the above recommendation. For many years now, India has had nuclear-armed submarines capable of obliterating the United States’ largest cities on its coasts within striking range of its coastal cities at all times, so the US can make a ’counter-proliferation’ strike on India only at the cost of losing its largest cities.
I have said that India can win an arms race with the United States - India produces about half a million engineering graduates per year against the US’ seventy thousand and has an unlimited amount of investment capital for the necessary research, development and production, which will also greatly benefit its economy as a whole. India has no alternative but to attain nuclear supremacy over the United States and eliminate this threat. All that is needed is a clear cut national commitment to this objective.
II) Why Nuclear Supremacy?
I have explained the concept of nuclear supremacy in the article titled “What is nuclear supremacy?”. In this connection, some basic facts have to be understood:
1) The law of the jungle still prevails in international relations. Striving for military supremacy -- which in this age means nuclear supremacy -- over all nations needs no explanation; its necessity is as obvious as the fact that water flows downwards. Only a country such as India with a thousand year history of slavery to various foreign invaders is unable to see the obvious.
2) Geopolitics, so far as it concerns India and the West, is all about white vs. non-white. The same behavior can have more than one possible explanations; my assertion of the role of race (white/non-white) in determining the United States' behavior toward Indians and India is based on observations made as a behavior scientist in the United States where I have lived for 41 years. What is often referred to as beneficial American 'aid' is actually poison; it is neither needed nor desirable and keeps India from developing its own capabilities. In the nuclear deal, it is not even aid but slavery. The aggressiveness of the United States toward non-white countries is such that there is no option for India but to attain nuclear supremacy over it and put this mad dog to sleep (meaning death). This is the reality and there is nothing very surprising about it. There is no need for India to be another Iran; India has four times the population of the United States and produces 7 times the number of engineers per year that the United States does. It is the effect of a thousand years of slavery and the British rule because of which Indians think of India as an Iran which needs to be afraid of the United States.
3) How did this slavery to the white man come about? An answer is in The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh): "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:..." Present day Indians’ behaviour is profoundly affected by the terrorization and subjugation inflicted on them by the British. This came on top of the terrorization and subjugation inflicted by Muslim invaders in the preceding 800 years. Since Muslims are no longer strong, Indians are coming out of fear of the Muslims but the fear of the white man keeps getting deeper and deeper as the white man’s power in relation to Indians keeps increasing. India is faced with an even deeper slavery to the Americans with the nuclear deal and all the other prongs it comes with. Attaining strategic nuclear parity, then supremacy and using this supremacy to eliminate this incomparably greater threat, will be India's real War of Independence. One does not need to refer to the holocaust beginning 1857 to know the incomparably greater American threat and its consequences, which I know directly but which remains a secret from the Indian people.There is a simple way to bring India out of its slavery and identify collaborators in India's slavery to American imperialism. Start with India's Army Chief and ask "Are you in favour of strategic nuclear parity with, or supremacy over, the United States as a national objective?" If the answer is not 'Yes', he should be shot on the spot. The same for all other generals and admirals, etc. The same for Manmohan Singh and members of his Cabinet. The same for leaders of political parties. The same for journalists writing on the nuclear deal. The same for 'strategic analysts', etc.
4) India has no shortage of manpower and my proposal about money (see, for example, my articles ‘How India‘s economy can grow 30% per year’ and ‘India’s technological and economic emancipation’ ) can be used to make India both militarily and economically number 1 in the world but military supremacy -- that is, nuclear supremacy -- is even more important than economic supremacy because, without it, it can be subjugated and enslaved (let's leave out who does the subjugation and enslavement). All of the invaders who conquered and enslaved India came from much poorer countries than 'the Golden Hind'.5) Aiming for nuclear parity with the United States, instead of nuclear supremacy over it, is not an option because the United States, by its nature, will always be striving for nuclear supremacy. This threat -- the United States -- must die for India to live.
The following is what I said, in a release to the press some time ago, about strategic nuclear parity with the United States:The root cause of the national suicide being committed through the nuclear deal is a failure of political parties to demand at least strategic parity with the United States-- parity with the United States requires at least ten thousand nuclear warheads and the missiles to deliver them to continental United States territory-- as an objective and criterion. While the demand for a Constitutional amendment requiring Parliament's ratification of such agreements in the BJP's statement of August 4 '07 is a long-overdue step, a national objective of strategic parity, at a minimum, with all countries of the world, including the United States, is essential to guide such decisions. This is not something optional but essential. I have said "Justice can only be delivered by your weapons" and showed "the supremacy of weapons in matters of justice" (this includes justice as between nations) and said that "The nonsense about 'minimal nuclear deterrence' is seen in the recolonisation of Pakistan, which has a 'minimal nuclear deterrent', by the United States". Just recently, a United States presidential candidate (Clinton) was "refusing to rule out the use of nuclear weapons against Osama bin Laden or other terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan" ( Washingtonpost.com, August 2 '07) and another U.S. presidential candidate (Obama) said he will undertake an "invasion" of Pakistan, which-- if Pakistan, which has nuclear weapons, defends itself-- will inevitably involve the use of nuclear weapons. India is constantly under the same threat, whether spoken or not, in all dealings with the United States. The BJP should look at its own statement dated December 27, 2005 on foreign policy at its National Executive Meeting which says Pakistan "strives for strategic parity" with India and, about "Indo-US relations", says "What must be at the core of our understanding is that 'strategic partnership' is ordinarily between two equals... accepting an asymmetrical relationship is not 'strategic partnership', it would be capitulation... Which is why the UPA's lack of understanding in dealing with the US is so worrying. With the UPA government's obsequious policies [and] a subservient relationship with the United States". The BJP must clearly understand that the "two equals" must, above all, be equal in nuclear weapons. By that I mean equal in nuclear strength, not just in protocol; even the puppet presidents of Iraq and Afghanistan are given guards of honour and treated as equal in protocol by the United States. I have shown that India has the means to quickly and easily not just attain strategic (nuclear) parity with the United States but surpass it in economic prosperity and well-being (see, for example, my article ‘How India’s economy can grow 30% per year’). These objectives must be clearly stated in policy statements. Article 51 of the Constitution, which says "The State shall endeavour to--... (b) maintain just and honorable relations between nations;", must be amended to "The State shall endeavour to--... (b) maintain just and honorable relations between nations by attaining and maintaining strategic parity, at a minimum, with all nations of the world in its weapons and by assisting victims of imperialism acquire necessary weapons, including nuclear weapons;". This Article (Article 51) of the Constitution, even as it exists now, provides a basis for Constitutional challenges, in court, to foreign policy acts that constitute "obsequious policies" toward and "subservient relationship" with the United States or that make India's foreign policy serve the United States' imperialist policies toward Iraq and Iran, etc. Recently the Supreme Court rejected a PIL seeking direction to the Central Government to seek Parliament's approval for the nuclear deal on the grounds that it would be interference in the government's treaty-making powers (a Constitutional amendment will be needed for that), but my PIL dated July 20, 2007 seeks "action against the Prime Minister, such as dismissal from office and prosecution for treason, for violating his oath of office to uphold the sovereignty of India by making joint statements, agreements and negotiations with the United States, in connection with said nuclear deal, that are highly injurious to such sovereignty ....", as indeed is clear even without the Hyde Act but particularly if, for example, the 123 agreement is read in conjunction with the Hyde Act. I have not heard anything from the Supreme Court regarding my PIL but if more such PILs are filed, seeking action against the Prime Minister on the grounds of violating his oath of office (which is in the Third Schedule of the Constitution) to uphold India's sovereignty, it will get the Supreme Court's attention-- and no Constitutional amendment is needed for PILs on these grounds.You cannot uphold the country's sovereignty without the weapons to defend and uphold its sovereignty, which requires strategic (nuclear) parity with the United States. The nuclear deal, in all its aspects and processes-- joint statements, agreements, negotiations, etc.-- injures India's ability to attain strategic (nuclear) parity with the United States and, thus, injures India's ability to defend and uphold its sovereignty and, thus, injures India's sovereignty and constitutes failure to uphold India's sovereignty. This is so even if there were no Hyde Act, no 123 agreement, etc. or no deal is finally signed or executed.Article 51 of the Constitution also requires India's government to endeavour to eliminate threats to just and honorable relations between nations and, since the United States is the principal transgressor of and threat to such relations between nations, endeavour to attain strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States and take measures, military and non-military, to eliminate this threat.For other countries of the world, this means getting out of the United States-sponsored denial regimes such as the Nuclear Suppliers Group, International Atomic Energy Agency, etc. and helping each other acquire nuclear weapons to cope with this threat to just and honorable relations between nations.
As I have shown above, even India’s Constitution requires striving to attain nuclear supremacy over the United States.
III) Objections to the Nuclear Deal:
The objections to the nuclear deal can be arranged in a hierarchy:- 1) The first and a fundamental objection is spending untold billions of dollars on imported reactors instead of ploughing the money into India's own nuclear power program more advanced and more capable (thanks to its nuclear "isolation" and apartheid) than that of the United States in important ways. It can be expanded 10 or 20-fold so India becomes one of the world's biggest EXPORTERS, not an IMPORTER, of the world's best and most economical reactors with the shortest time for installation (all this is true of Indian reactors even at this moment). There is significant demand for Indian reactors from other countries. This by itself is enough reason to summarily and totally reject the nuclear deal. Indians, such as the head of the Nuclear Power Corporation of India, S. K. Jain, say they will not export them unless they receive permission from the white master. In an act of treason, the National Security Adviser M. K. Nayanan has said that importing uranium from non-NSG countries -- the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) is a cartel like OPEC -- will be against “international law”. Similarly, in another act of treason, External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee during his recent visit to Egypt said that India cannot engage in nuclear trade with other countries because it is not a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty. These statements have gone unchallenged in India’s media controlled by CIA-RAW. India can extract an unlimited amount of uranium from sea water for which the Japanese demonstrated the technology and economic viability decades ago and for which India’s Department of Atomic Energy has developed indigenous technology but the United States has been suppressing this option because it will subvert its attempts to bring and keep countries like India in slavery and Indian politicians and scientists, bought up by the United States, are keeping quiet about it.
2) The second objection is that the imported reactors will be light water reactors. These will not only make India dependent in perpetuity on imported fuel and vulnerable to all kinds of pressures but, even if an unlimited amount of fuel was somehow magically guaranteed, it will fatally injure both India's 3-stage nuclear power program and its nuclear weapons program. This is so even if there was not an upper limit of 20% enrichment while reprocessing the waste fuel from the imported reactors. Light water reactors are inherently "proliferation-resistant" (that is, it is difficult to get bomb-grade material from them), though not "proliferation-proof". In any case, the 20% cap on enrichment (weapons and certain types of reactors require around 95% enrichment) cripples India's strategic (nuclear weapons) program-- because parity with or supremacy over the United States requires at least ten thousand nuclear warheads-- and ensures permanent slavery to the white man and permanent serfdom to India.
When the Russians offered the two light water reactors, now under construction in India at Kudankulam, the Department of Atomic Energy had strongly opposed it correctly saying that it will only benefit the Russian nuclear industry and light water reactors will break India's control over the nuclear fuel cycle and subvert India's 3-stage nuclear power program as well as its nuclear weapons program. But Vajpayee shoved it down India's throat on the instructions of the C.I.A. which calculated that there will be less resistance to such a disadvantageous deal with the Russians and once a couple of light water reactors have been brought in, it will set the stage for a full-scale American assault to subjugate and disembowel India's nuclear program. A bought up Kakodkar is now lying and saying that importing Russian reactors was always in the plans. Press reports at the time of Manmohan Singh’s visit to Washington in July, 2004, during which he signed the joint statement of July 18, 2004 with Bush about the nuclear deal, etc., had said Kakodkar had strenuously objected to the deal but was silenced by the traitor ambassador of India in Washington by saying the Prime Minister had to have a “successful” visit. After he was bribed, Bush asked Kakodkar, during his visit to New Delhi in March, 2006 if he was happy now.3) Then there are the various requirements in the July 18 '05 joint statement such as separation of civilian and military reactors, IAEA inspections on the civilian reactors including all imported ones, the necessity to get Nuclear Suppliers Group approvals, etc. which cripple India's nuclear program as a whole and bind it hand and foot to the United States. 4) Then there is the blizzard of demands and restrictions in the Hyde Act and previous U.S. legislation including the prohibition of testing (the latest 'concession' by the U.S. on testing simply says that, rather than a test resulting in automatic return of all imported U.S. equipment, the U.S. president may ALLOW India to conduct a test at his pleasure if India begs and convinces the White Master) that make India a total slave to the United States which, even under the documents, will be able to do any damn thing it wants to India in all its internal and external affairs-- a serfdom that is comprehensive and complete. 5) Then there is the United States' propensity and certainty of doing things to India-- once it has India dependent on U.S. reactors, fuel, permissions, etc.-- to arm-twist, blackmail and invade if the lesser breeds don't do everything it wants them to do-- the kind of things it has done and is doing to Iraq and will certainly do to India, including its complete nuclear disarmament, participation in U.S.-led military campaigns against other countries, the total colonisation of its economy and manpower to serve American needs, etc. Indians on the C.I.A.'s payroll have been pushing this deal which should have been and was instantly and totally rejected, not just by me. The BJP/Vajpayee came out with a written statement rejecting the deal within a couple days of the joint statement of July 18 '05 (before the Hyde Act, the 123 agreement, etc.) but they have been yielding to the trangressions of Manmohan Singh progressively and now Advani says everything is fine so long as India can conduct nuclear tests in a Pokhran III! This is extremely stupid, to take the most charitable view of him.
Getting India's nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, whether or not India imports American reactors, has been a prime American goal because at least 75% of the damage to India's nuclear program would have been done once the facilities are placed under IAEA inspections, even if nothing further is done and no nuclear deal with the United States is finally signed and no foreign reactors, from the United States or from Russia or France, are bought. Any move to put Indian nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, beyond the ones under IAEA inspections at present, is a grave injury to the nation and an invasion of India like the American invasion of Iraq and deserves a response appropriate to an invasion. If the nuclear deal with the United States is abandoned but IAEA inspections are brought in on the pretext that they are needed to import reactors and fuel from Russia -- one prong of the American strategy and the Americans’ Indian collaborators has been to get the IAEA inspections in place without completing the nuclear deal with the United States and buy Russian reactors instead of American ones, to begin with -- the import of Russian reactors instead of pumping the money into the indigenous nuclear program will be an additional injury. I have said India's nuclear program should be designed and operated so that electricity is a byproduct of producing material for making weapons rather than material for making weapons being a byproduct of producing electricity. Manmohan Singh is still starving the Indian nuclear program of funds and still blocking the option of getting uranium from non-NSG countries, if necessary, though simply exploiting the uranium reserves in the country already known -- at present only 300 tons per year is mined though the known reserves are over 78,000 tons not counting the extremely rich deposits recently found in Ladakh -- is quite enough for India's needs. It is a lie to say that India's nuclear power production cannot be expanded beyond 10,000 MW on domestic uranium, though the production of electricity must be a byproduct of producing material for making weapons. A country that has ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States cannot be restricted from importing, without IAEA inspections, etc., however much uranium it wants from wherever it wants by the United States or any other power; the power of nuclear weapons is what India needs; electricity can be produced in numerous other ways for the time being. Agreeing to even talks on new inspections with the IAEA -- an instrument of American imperialism -- are acts of treason and deserve punishment as severe as for the rest of the nuclear deal.
Nuclear supremacy over the United States has to be India’s national objective and its one point agenda (see my article ‘What is nuclear supremacy?’). The nuclear deal is totally incompatible with nuclear supremacy over the United States and deserves to be summarily rejected without going into any details. This is the most fundamental objection of all.
IV) Nuclear Deal -- An Invasion Of India In Progress:
India's nuclear program is its only hope of casting off the yoke of slavery it has been under for a millenium and the so-called nuclear 'deal' with the U.S. is meant to strip that by making India dependent on unneeded and unwanted foreign nuclear technology and fuel (India designs and builds its own nuclear power plants and can even export them and makes its own nuclear fuel), stopping its nuclear research (such as by putting the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research and other institutions, which collaborate in its strategic program, in a 'civilian' list--this is a way of destroying them and India's strategic program by other means -- and closing down the research reactor CIRUS under false excuses) and binding it in chains (after making India dependent on unneeded and unwanted foreign nuclear technology and fuel, "US President has power to scrap agreement if after its enactment India detonates a nuclear device", thus capping and later stripping its nuclear weapons program). The United States' tactic is described by an Indian expression roughly translated as 'first catching a finger, then the wrist'. When it comes to the United States, especially in nuclear matters, especially in dealings with non-white countries, agreements, laws, treaties, etc., mean nothing; only raw power counts. The 'deal' has been portrayed in the Indian press, controlled by the C.I.A. through RAW, as something sought by India but which may only grudgingly be 'granted' by the U.S. Congress and government when exactly the opposite is true: it has been shoved down India's throat through RAW and C.I.A.-controlled politicians and arm-twisting of scientists and the show of reluctance by the U.S. Congress has been meant to make Indians feel they are getting something when they are being robbed of their future and their most vital national assets and all they are getting is a perpetuation of their thousand year old slavery and the stripping away of their only hope for independence. India should not let the United States anywhere near its nuclear program. Indian politicians as well as RAW are the C.I.A.'s servants.Russia's independence has been stripped away by its unilateral nuclear disarmament I have described. A former U.S. defence official at Harvard crowed of the success of U.S. policy, comparing present day Russia to Nigeria and of turning a superpower into a medium-sized country that exports oil and gas. Soon the United states will be doing to India what it is doing to Iran, with IAEA inspections, threats of sanctions and invasions and the rest.
The assault on India's nuclear program is the present day version of a foreign invasion. Military supremacy over an invader is not optional but essential for survival. Military supremacy today means nuclear supremacy. But "nuclear supremacy" or "strategic nuclear supremacy" for India is not even mentioned by Indian politicians, press, ‘strategic experts‘, etc. Being ignorant and enslaved cannot be a permanent excuse. As I have said, many Iraqi generals were bought up by Americans in the course of their 2003 invasion but it did not make it any less of an invasion and the invasion was expressly called an invasion on Iraq's nuclear program. The fact that many Indian politicians and others have been bought up does not make this any less of an invasion. This is a war for survival and for independence and requires the energy, speed, commitment and a full spectrum mobilisation appropriate to a war.
The failure to even mention -- much less demand -- strategic nuclear supremacy for India on the part of Indian politicians, media, ‘strategic experts‘, etc., shows their commitment to continued slavery to the United States and the white man. The politicians and the media are the stonewall between the people and the twin objectives -- nuclear supremacy and rapid prosperity through my proposal about money (see my article, ‘How India‘s economy can grow 30% per year’ on merinews) -- that the C.I.A. has erected and maintains through RAW. Of these two objectives, nuclear supremacy is the more fundamental one; a demand for strategic nuclear supremacy will clear the way for everything else, including rapid economic prosperity, besides automatically requiring ejection of the nuclear deal. A demand for strategic nuclear supremacy is also essential for overcoming the subjugation imposed on Indians by the holocaust committed by the British, killing ten million in ten years following 1857 -- the killings undoubtedly continued in the years following the first decade after 1857 -- which is responsible for the subjugation to the white man the politicians, the media and others display. In the present age, the white man's ability to kill and subjugate is incomparably greater than that of the British in 1857 and this threat further deepens the subjugation and the slavery. By demanding strategic nuclear supremacy, Indians can overcome this subjugation and then eliminate this threat. There can be no more important item on the nation's agenda. In fact, this should be India's one-point agenda; everything else will follow as so many corollaries. A single-minded pursuit of strategic nuclear supremacy will revitalise the nation as nothing else can and inaugurate a new chapter in the nation's and the world's history.
It bears repeating that the nuclear deal is being IMPOSED on India -- the control of politicians and others by bribery, etc., is also a part of the imposition though the ultimate threat of military action is its foundation -- and this imposition is a manifestation of India's state of subjugation to the white man which has other aspects -- such as sending 80,000 postgraduate students to the United States every year, making no serious effort to educate them in India, putting half a million engineers and others on the payroll, directly or indirectly, of the United States every year, so they join the millions other Indians, military and non-military, on British payrolls willing to give their lives for their British masters and now are willing to give their lives for their American masters -- and an opposition to the nuclear deal has to be founded on an opposition to subjugation to the white man, which requires demanding strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States. Without demanding nuclear supremacy over the United States, you are leaving India open to the nuclear deal and other things being IMPOSED on a subjugated India, subjugated by killing uncounted millions in the past and the subjugation maintained by the threat of killing even more in the future. Weapons are the foundation of sovereignty. Adopting strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States as a national objective -- which is the operative part of sovereignty, rejecting subjugation to the white man -- will automatically make the nuclear deal untenable and unthinkable. Without adopting nuclear supremacy over the United States as a national objective, the nuclear deal also will continue to be IMPOSED on India by various methods. Adopting strategic nuclear supremacy as a national objective will not only ward off the nuclear deal and free India from subjugation to the white man but will also open the floodgates to prosperity and achievement in every sphere that a billion-plus people are capable of. Unlike the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, India's nuclear supremacy will be directed at eliminating the threat, because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy. The threat must die for India to live. A single-minded pursuit of strategic nuclear supremacy is required for this.
Are the political parties saying they cannot communicate to the masses the necessity of military supremacy over India's number one enemy which is trying to impose total slavery on India?
When the United States sent its warships into the Palk Straits, in the area where it wants the Sethusamudram channel, it was in service of its plans to deny, by military occupation, India access to India's thorium deposits in case it cannot get India to switch to 'proliferation-resistant' reactors, etc. The International Atomic Energy Agency is a principal instrument of American imperialism used to provide grounds for invasions and occupation of other countries and calling its head an "honoured guest" of India is like Iraq's puppet government calling American occupation forces honoured guests of Iraq. Time is of the essence in acquiring nuclear supremacy for India and for removing, by machine guns and bulldozers or other means, all those who stand in the way of India's nuclear supremacy.
This brings up the point that any government of India, supposedly a nuclear power, behaves like a mouse. An agreement is only as good as your (military) power and willingness to enforce it. The United States flouts international agreements, ranging from the United Nations Charter (when invading or threatening to invade other countries, for example) to the earlier 123 agreement with India, with impunity and at will. The denial regimes, such as the Nuclear Suppliers Group which is the reason for India not being able to import Uranium freely and thus the reason for the whole nuclear deal, are nothing but an expression of American power as are unanimous UN Security Council resolutions in which Arab countries endorse United States invasions of other Arab countries, for example. I have said that if India HAS to get Uranium from outside India for any reason (though, in fact, it does not), it should plan on a military takeover of Australia rather than enslaving itself to the United States through this deal. But India's governments dare not utter a word about nuclear armed missiles capable of reaching the United States, much less a military takeover of Australia.
Denial regimes such as NSG (which is the 'cause' of India entering the slave deal known as the nuclear deal) and MTCR are nothing but instruments of United States imperialism as, indeed, is the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) whose inspections, etc., provide the basis for U.S. invasions and India should have nothing to do with any of them. The people should also demand what is being done for attaining strategic nuclear parity with and supremacy over the United States, both in the number of nuclear warheads and missiles capable of reaching the continental United States territory. The lack of such parity, or supremacy, is the key to India's slavery and, if you are silent on this, you are a collaborator in India's slavery to American imperialism. A demand for strategic nuclear parity with and supremacy over the United States is the key to blocking the nuclear deal and all the other prongs of the march into slavery to the United States and, beyond it, eliminating the threat from this psychopathic serial killer, as well as the key to rapid economic prosperity for India of a kind unprecedented in human history. Rapid economic prosperity for India will also hinder the purchase of Indian politicians, journalists( the last paragraph of a column by K. P. Nayar in The Telegraph of August 22 '07 described the routine planting of entire 'campaigns' in Indian newspapers by the U.S. embassy in support of U.S.-dictated policies; an article by Pranab Dhal Samanta in Indian Express of August 24 '07, page 11, misleadingly comparing India's nuclear deal with China's is an example of such readymade campaigns supplied by the C.I.A. through the U.S. embassy or through RAW), etc.
V) India’s Technological & Economic Emancipation
SHORTLY AFTER being made president, APJ Abdul Kalam said that there were 10,000 scientists and engineers working in India’s space program. He said this because, in a letter to the Indian press in 1996-97, I said "It is natural for Indians, both technical and non-technical, to feel dazzled and awed by the white man’s achievements in science and technology, from nuclear weapons to landing men on the moon", but that my overwhelming conclusion after working at a US aerospace giant was that these were ordinary people doing ordinary things, that the problem with India was that there were not enough people doing those things and that these numbers needed to be increased "tenfold and more" ; the figure of 10,000 represented such an increase.
But, in a country of one billion, there should be at least one million scientists and engineers engaged in Government Sponsored Research and Development (GSRD), in every conceivable field (Nano technology will be one of dozens of such fields one could think of). With the unlimited financial resources provided by my proposal about money (outlined in a letter published in three parts on March 11, 12 and 13, 1997, in The Observer of Business and Politics, New Delhi and in subsequent letters to the press), this is entirely feasible (see my example of building a new railway line; the money spent would have increased the Gross Domestic Product by several times it’s amount even before the new railway line has carried a single paying passenger or a single ton of freight; the same applies to the money spent on research and development).
India can easily produce 200,000 engineering graduates and master of science degree holders per year who can be trained to be research and development workers. Let us say 10 per cent of these should be engaged in fundamental research--10,000 in Physics, 10,000 in Chemistry and so on. They can form a research community in themselves; their findings need not be shared with the outside world.
When the British left India in 1947, they left behind a puppet regime of the kind the Americans are setting up in Iraq and have set up in Afghanistan in the form of the Karzai government. If Indians are to emerge from their centuries of slavery and, in fact, survive, the above program is absolutely essential. India’s civil service, police service and military are like the collaborator civil service, police, and military the Americans are setting up in Iraq. Their primary role is to maintain the white man’s control over India. India’s Constitution was written under a British administrator, Mountbatten, who continued as governor general of "independent" India, very much as the Constitution of Iraq’s puppet/collaborator government was written under an American administrator (India’s Constitution unabashedly refers to the British king simply as "His Majesty").
The problem is not the Constitution, but the continued control of India’s administration and intelligence agencies, which continue to function as branches of British/American intelligence agencies. India’s Research and Analysis Wing has in innumerable ways suppressed my proposal about money, under which India’s per capita income can exceed that of the United States (US) in a matter of, say, 15 years. They will implement only those parts of it, in highly diluted form, for which they receive permission from the White Master. When an American Treasury Secretary said that India’s GDP growth rate could be 10 per cent per year, then the Research and Analysis Wing dared to advance a growth rate of eight per cent. India’s population at large is equally enslaved. The Americans have disbanded the Iraqi armed forces and are creating a collaborator army; India’s army is the collaborator army that helped the British rule India; all it’s units and regiments, etc., have retained their former identities and regularly celebrate the anniversaries of their founding by the British. The extreme imbalance of power created by the white man’s extreme technological superiority has led to an extremely fierce loyalty to him in the regime and the population at large (see my letter sequence from March, 2002 to April, 2003, about the "inferior Indian niggers" ). It is a thankless task to try to break their chains, but I feel I should try.
VI) How India’s Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year Or More:
Suppose a government wishes to increase the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by twenty, thirty or forty percent in a given year over and above, say, a seven percent increase that is expected. All it has to do is print and spend an additional amount, equal to twenty, thirty or forty percent of the GDP, in that year on productive purposes. By definition, the GDP would have increased by an additional twenty, thirty or forty percent that year (not counting the multiplier effect, referred to my letters to the press, which will depend on how the money is spent). Printing the money takes no creativity, thinking up productive purposes to spend it on does not take much either. The money can be spent directly by the government, through private parties or both ways though, of course, by spending the money directly, the government does not have to wait for private parties to come up with proposals. The important thing is that how much the GDP grows next year-- seven percent or twenty seven percent or more-- is strictly in the government's own hands. Terms such as "deficits" (there are no deficits when all the money a government spends is printed by it; if the government does take in money as taxes or charges, the effects of deficits on interest rates occur only if the government borrows the additional money, not if it prints it) and "overheating" of the economy are worthless concepts which only serve to maintain the status quo in which various people have a vested interest. As I wrote some years ago, "people get pleasure from the pain and deprivation of others and [reference to a head of government], who is no exception, will not want [a change]". Note that the recommendation above is to print and spend an amount equal to twenty, thirty or forty percent of the GDP IN ADDITION TO whatever the government was otherwise going to do by way of taxing (unnecessary as it is) and spending, etc. Since the production of goods and services, including consumer as well as capital goods, will rise right along with the additional spending, any effects of the additional spending will be benign. Even if some adverse effects are postulated, in no way can they overcome the huge advantage from a GDP growth of twenty seven percent or more over seven percent in a year. During war, government spending on equipment and supplies (guns and bullets, etc.) can suddenly increase ten, twenty or fifty times. During World War II, the United States government put in place price controls (under J. K. Galbraith) to curb the inflationary effect of such spending (since production capacity was diverted to war equipment and supplies from consumer items). (It was the enormous increase in U. S. government spending during World War II that gave rise to its 'National Debt'). A similarly sudden and large increase in government spending in peace time on the production of food, clothing, shelter, transportation, etc., for the citizenry will not result in the kind of price rise the United States expected in World War II, because the production of consumer goods and services will increase along with the money supply-- even if a lot of the additional spending is directed to military purposes. In any case, price controls can be used in peace time, if necessary, as in war time. The United States, sitting on top of the world economically and militarily, may not feel any need to increase its GDP by twenty seven percent or more in a year. For governments of countries such as India, not to do that is treasonous as well as stupid. With a growth rate of twenty seven percent per year, a country's GDP will double every three years. India's per capita income will equal that of the United States in fifteen years (the development and implementation of environment-protection technologies will be a part of the expenditure program) and Russia's in six years. And this will not depend on the vagaries of markets (in no way can markets bring this about) but, as pointed out above, will be strictly in a government's own hands. 'Oligarchs' (there are a lot of oligarchs in India but the masses remain impoverished) can never equal a government's ability to print money and, in any case, a government has to be a dispenser of justice as well as money (often justice equals money). All the advantages of motivation, etc., ascribed to 'free enterprise' are also available to a government, as I have pointed out. Apart from standards of living, there are military and geo-strategic consequences and the ever-increasing despotism of the United States means that this has to be done on a war footing. India's government does not do it because several of India's prime ministers (Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee) have been on the payroll of the C.I.A. and its real 'government', the Research and Analysis Wing, functions as a branch of the C.I.A. (see my article 'India's Technological and Economic Emancipation'). But what about a country such as Russia? Here another factor needs to be considered. American press reports 3-4 years ago referred to satellite-based technology the United States has had in place to monitor "the conversations of foreign leaders" (not just conversations over the telephone or other electrical/electronic media though it includes ability to monitor electrical/electronic communications of all kinds also). Since at least 1977, the United States has been able to keep individuals under 24-hour video and audio surveillance by satellite. Psychologist B. F. Skinner of Harvard made no secret of "my spies" keeping me under such surveillance, one use of which is a C.I.A. program started by Skinner to "control" a targeted individual's behavior by various verbal (including the use of conditioned stimuli, ratio schedules, etc.) and other means. I was targeted primarily due to Skinner's personal motivation flowing from the fact that I had exposed his plagiarism and destroyed his school of psychology (see my article 'A Harvard Sophomore's Plagiarism and B. F. Skinner's') but also because I have been the only threat to the United States' ability to keep India economically, technologically and militarily weak and under its boots (in part through my 'influence' on Prime Minister Indira Gandhi --about which Skinner asked "How about your political contacts on either side-- Mrs. Gandhi?" though I had not breathed a word about any such 'contacts' -- and former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi-- both of whom were assassinated for this reason by India's Research and Analysis Wing on the C.I.A.'s orders). But it would have been surprising if the United States had not used such surveillance and control over other foreign leaders. An article in a Russian newspaper by an American capitalist consultant on Russia a couple of months ago referred to "the mysteriously self-destructive behavior" of Russia's leaders, referring to the dismantling of the benefits system (the same system of benefits can be administered by private contractors, if desired, who will be paid by the government and those who got free transportation before can still get free transportation), but such behavior started in the mid-eighties, with Mikhail Gorbachev. It is more than likely that similar surveillance and control has been used against Soviet/Russian leaders. It is noteworthy that both the United States government and the Indian government had proceeded to implement my proposal about money, as I have described in letters dated August 1, 2001, September 6, 2001 and April 13, 2001 (also letters about stock market manipulation by the U.S. Treasury Department by pumping money into the stock market; Bush made a trip through an underground tunnel from the White House to the Treasury Department to see the set up created for such manipulation) that appeared in the American online newspaper thecurrentonline. The Vajpayee government set up a separate Cabinet Committee on Economic Strategy for the purpose of stealing my proposal about money. When I pointed out that they were trying to STEAL my proposal about money, they stopped implementing it.
VII) A Harvard Sophomore’s Plagiarism & B. F. Skinner’s:
Two years ago, in 2006, the media in the United States were full of reports about the case of plagiarism by an Indian sophomore at Harvard University. But neither American nor Indian media have reported on a case of plagiarism by B. F. Skinner, who was America's most famous scientist in the last two decades of his life, which was exposed in a paper published by an Indian scientist (the undersigned), or on its monumental consequences for India and the world and how that case of plagiarism was covered up with even graver consequences for not just India but for all mankind. This write up deals only with the plagiarism aspect and not with the cover up and crimes which followed it.
A graduate student from the Indian subcontinent at Boston's Northeastern University was accused of plagiarism because the quality of English in assigned work she turned in for a course was incomparably superior to anything she was capable of writing and, to prove this, she was required to answer the same questions in the presence of a faculty member. She wrote about thirty pages in perhaps two hours which exactly reproduced what she had earlier turned in. The faculty member alleged she had copied from papers she had with her. In her rebuttal, the student wrote this faculty member was watching her like the proverbial "hawk" throughout this session and her charge of copying was a "damnable lie". She explained, in her rebuttal and to her faculty adviser, that she had "memorized" what she reproduced in the presence of the faculty member. The lying faculty member was obliged to leave the university.
The Harvard sophomore, who was accused of plagiarism in a novel she had published, said (New York Times, April 27 '06, Internet) she had read the books from which she is alleged to have plagiarized three or four times, that she has a "photographic memory" and had last read the books some time before she wrote her own book. Psychologist B. F. Skinner, whose plagiarism I exposed, upon which he was awarded an honorary doctorate by Harvard and I was mugged in a Harvard seminar, wrote in his 'Notebooks' that the practice, several thousands of years old and still continuing, of Brahmin priests memorizing entire books (such as the Vedas) may have had a (genetically) "selective effect" endowing them with superior memory (and other cognitive abilities). Memorization of very long texts is still the standard way students learn, at all levels, in the Indian subcontinent and the practice is not limited to Brahmin priests (the Northeastern University student was Muslim). Such ability, commonplace to Indians, is astonishing to Americans. The Harvard sophomore, of Indian origin with near perfect SAT scores, could be expected to have genetically superior memory and her explanation of how she came to reproduce portions of books she had read was believable. This did not mean that she did not intentionally plagiarize, just that her explanation was credible.
B. F. Skinner, author of 'Verbal Behavior', described playing the "sedulous ape" to established authors as a way budding authors learn. Examples of similarities between the Harvard sophomore's novel and the novels she read (Boston Globe, April 25 '06, Internet) would have fit this description if the similarities were intentional. The similarities could be unconscious yet intentional (there are unconscious intentions). But they could have been both unconscious and unintentional, because of the way a person's verbal repertoire is formed. Skinner's own plagiarism was infinitely more serious (see my paper in BEHAVIORISM, Spring, 1976). Skinner was voted by American psychology department chairpersons as the most influential living psychologist and, along with Sigmund Freud, one of the two most influential psychologists of all time. A survey showed that his world-wide reputation exceeded the combined reputation of the thirty or so Nobel prize winners in the Boston area. It was based on his position of 'radical behaviorism' which he defined in terms of his opposition to what he called 'mentalism' and Freud, of course, is the great mentalist. For his position to be viable, he had to provide an account of the so-called 'higher mental processes' such as language, which he did in 'Verbal Behavior'. By showing that his account of language was simply a refinement of the work of Freud, my paper in BEHAVIORISM eliminated any basic distinction between his position and Freud's and the basis for his claim to being a great and original thinker. In a question and answer session with thousands of his followers who packed the grand ballroom of the Hilton hotel in Chicago in May, 1977, he was very angrily denounced by his own followers, such as by one who stood up, livid with rage, shouting, referring to my paper and its implications ("SATISH CHANDRA HAS SHOWN..."), for the fraud he had perpetrated on them and the world; his world-wide reputation and appearance on TIME magazine's cover, etc., were due to the fundamental importance of the basic nature of human beings, for prescriptions on how they should live and be educated and governed, issues of freedom, etc., of whether they are machines or have a mind or soul and how they function. Skinner acknowledged "similarities" between him and Freud shown by "Chandra" in "BEHAVIORISM", but had no response beyond first emphatically and aggressively saying "Or Jesus Christ! Or B. F. Skinner!" in the same breath, then minimizing the importance of such matters by appealing to the general state of ethics and what is acceptable in academia with a light-hearted "what--Miller wrote it, Gallanter takes credit for it, Pribram believes it!" (these were co-authors of a book in cognitive psychology). Up to then, Skinner had had his critics such as Chomsky of M.I.T. but had, correctly, maintained that Chomsky's review of 'Verbal Behavior' was based on very poor scholarship and a misunderstanding of his position. He could not say that about my paper in BEHAVIORISM, the principal vehicle for theoretical work in radical behaviorism, whose editor called me with profound emotion about a day after he received it and wrote to me "Heartiest congratulations on what I regard to be a major contribution to work in the field". From Germany alone, more than two dozen psychologists wrote me requesting reprints, besides every behaviorist in the United States. That paper was effective in a way that Chomsky's was not and killed behaviorism ( the journal's name has been changed to 'Behavior and Philosophy'). Skinner himself wrote to me about that paper, before the above session with his followers, "...want to tell you, while the spell is on me, how much I admire what you have done. You have made a much more courageous use of the autoclitic and the atomic operant than I did, with breath-taking results. Seldom have I read a paper that seemed to me to contain so much that was new and forward-moving...", etc. But after the above session with his followers, his behavior was very different.
Verbal behavior is a far more complicated matter than either Skinner or Freud (or cognitive psychology) provide for. For example, person A can show induction from person B's verbal behavior without ever coming into contact (as conventionally understood) with person B's verbal behavior. The Harvard sophomore, though, had repeated, extended contact with the other author's books. In an example (Boston Globe, April 24 '06, Internet) both authors refer to "170 specialty stores". This puts a question mark on intentional plagiarizing, because an intentional plagiarizer would have changed the number to something other than 170.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
About the author:
Satish Chandra has two undergraduate degrees (a bachelor's in Physics/Chemistry/Mathematics and a bachelor's in Electrical Engineering) and ten years of graduate work (two years in Electrical Engineering, at Carnegie-Mellon University and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; two years in Business Administration, at the University of Rochester Graduate School of Management; and six years in Psychology, in a doctoral program in Clinical Psychology at the State University of New York at Buffalo and at Harvard University). His published research in Psychology has been recognized as "a major contribution to work in the field" and has received the highest professional accolade. He is a member of the New York Academy of Sciences, American Psychological Society (now Association for Psychological Science) and American Chemical Society. His research integrated the psychoanalytic and behavioral approaches. B. F. Skinner, voted by American psychology department chairpersons as the most influential living psychologist and, along with Sigmund Freud, one of the two most influential psychologists of all time, wrote to him about his research: "Dear Dr. Chandra: I have just got around to reading your BRILLIANT paper... and want to tell you, while the spell is on me, how much I admire what you have done. You have made a much more courageous use of the autoclitic and the atomic operant than I did, with breath-taking results./ Seldom have I read a paper that seemed to me to contain so much that was new and forward moving...". He has been quoted in newspaper accounts as saying "I can reasonably claim to be the foremost behavior scientist in the United States...". (He had exposed B. F. Skinner's plagiarism, so he has not formally received the Ph.D.; see the article ‘A Harvard Sophomore‘s Plagiarism & B. F. Skinner‘s‘). He is listed in Who's Who in America ( 2008 Edition and earlier editions), Who'sWho in the World (2009 Edition, pub. Nov.2008), Who's Who in Medicine and Healthcare (6th Edition, 2006-2007) and Who's Who in Science and Engineering (2006-2007).
Satish Chandra stood first amongst all branches of engineering in the merit-ranking exam at I.I.T., Kharagpur in 1961 and was nominated for the Best Institute Graduate of the Year award by the Department chairman in 1966. He won first prizes in Institute-wide competitions in English debating, Hindi debating and the Annual English Essay Contest in 1964-65 and was elected President of the Departmental society in his final year. Among his achievements he lists:- 1.He can reasonably claim to be the foremost behavior scientist in the United States. 2.His experimental work, on Biological Clocks, using Operant Conditioning procedures, if and when completed, will revolutionize Biology and Medicine. 3.His theory of money is in the process of revolutionizing Economics and public finance. It was responsible for the Council of Economic Advisers being thrown out of the White House and for Bush's statement in early 2003 that "Both parties in both houses of Congress" now understand that cutting taxes creates jobs (so long as the government does not make a corresponding reduction in the money it spends). From 1975 on, he informally advised Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on India's domestic policies and international affairs. For more information, see his web page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
ADDED JULY 16, 2008: The reference to Indira and Rajiv Gandhi in the addendum dated July 15 ‘08 below does not mean that either Nehru or his descendants have been patriots of any kind. What I said in my letter dated May 15, 2004 below bears repeating:
“Starting about 10 hours before he tendered his resignation, Vajpayee, through the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, tried hard to induce the undersigned to issue a statement urging him to not resign (as I have said over the years, he, like Indira and Rajiv, has been a life-long paid agent of British and American intelligence agencies, with the Soviets providing some antidote which gave India a semblance of independence; Indira was made prime minister by the KGB's assassination of Shastri; and as Nehru admitted to U.S. ambassador Galbraith, he was a life-long agent of the British). No more than about 80,000 British, women and children included, ruled India for centuries. Nothing that can be said about the stupidity and slavisheness of Indians will be an exaggeration. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam got his start when the undersigned persuaded Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to start the Integrated Guided Missile Program. He was made President when the undersigned wrote "Indians show no awareness of the importance of research and of scientists(except mediocre ones rewarded by the white man) and are doomed". India's space program was expanded tenfold on guidance from the undersigned (see letter dated January 5, 2004, below). India's economic and technological salvation depends on the undersigned. Kalam should recognize the undersigned as his Guru. If he is Rashtrapati, the undersigned is Rashtrapita. He should announce that he will not invite any person of foreign origin to form the government and should invite the undersigned to India to provide further guidance.”
What I said at the end of my letter dated February 26, 2005 below also bears repeating:
“It is noteworthy that both the United States government and the Indian government had proceeded to implement my proposal about money, as you will see if you click on the link below and see my letters dated August 1, 2001; September 6, 2001 and April 13, 2001 (also the letters about stock market manipulation by the U.S. Treasury Department by pumping money into the stock market; Bush made a trip through an underground tunnel from the White House to the Treasury Department to see the set up created for such manipulation):
http://www.thecurrentonline.com/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1
[The Vajpayee government set up a separate Cabinet Committee on Economic Strategy --separate from the already existing Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs -- expressly for the purpose of stealing my proposal about money.]
When I pointed out that they were trying to STEAL my proposal about money, they stopped implementing it.”
The destruction of New Delhi with a nuclear detonation (see below) is what will save India.
ADDED JULY 15, 2008: The destruction of RAW does not mean simply disbanding the agency and letting its employees continue their service to the CIA through other organisations, old or new, or in other roles. It is a mammoth agency with just the number of joint secretaries in the hundreds. It is India’s real ‘government’ and the politicians and civil servants largely obey its dictates. It puts the words in the mouths of cabinet ministers, etc., and determines most policies that are, erroneously, attributed to them. Any one, even a prime minister, whom CIA-RAW considers inconvenient is eliminated, if necessary by death, as I mentioned regarding the deaths of Indira and Rajiv Gandhi below. I have shown how almost all terrorist incidents in India since 1983 have been carried out by outfits controlled by the CIA either directly or through intelligence agencies in the region, including India’s RAW. The Jain Commision of Inquiry, which went into Rajiv Gandhi’s death, acknowledged that the LTTE, which carried out his assassination, was created and controlled by RAW. It was an open secret that MQM, in Pakistan’s Sindh province, when it was known as a terrorist organization, was a creation of RAW. But the same is true of many terrorist outfits that operate in India. RAW’s role in terrorism and separatism in India is described below. Another example of its multifarious activities, given below, is its spreading heroin addiction and AIDS first in India’s Northeast then elsewhere to provide the United States with a population to use as guinea pigs for AIDS vaccine development. I have described how both Rajiv Gandhi (after being blackmailed with threats of exposure of the Bofors kickbacks) and Vajpayee cooperated in this. But terrorism, etc., are the least of its activities; I mentioned those only because they are publicly known. Its sabotage of India’s research and development activities, of which the sabotage of the Arjun tank is just one example, is among the deadliest of its activities. The nuclear deal and its various aspects -- media control, replacing indigenous production of uranium and reactors with imports, buying up politicians, scientists, etc. -- is just the largest and deadliest of such activities, leaving out the 24-hour satellite surveillance and all the crimes, at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars per year for the past 31 years, against India’s greatest scientist. The point is that all the tens of thousands of RAW employees are guilty of the gravest treason and deserve the death penalty. So do all the politicians and civil servants etc. in New Delhi who are willing collaborators of CIA-RAW. I have said that the nuclear detonation that will destroy New Delhi and white rule over India will be centered on RAW headquarters.
ADDED JULY 14, 2008: I have written below about CIA-RAW's control of Indian media and CIA-RAW's extensive sabotage of indigenous research and development to keep India dependent on other countries for defence and other equipment (the nuclear deal is just another CIA-RAW operation of that kind, though of a scope and with consequences far graver than any such operation till now). An example of this is a Bharat-Rakshak discussion thread about a black box installed by DRDO in Arjun tanks that documented the sabotage of its engines; such sabotage has been the basis of the Army's rejection, on RAW's prompting, of the Arjun tank in favour of imports. A CIA-RAW operative, who serves as a moderator on Bharat-Rakshak and controls the forum, just locked away this discussion thread so the posts documenting the sabotage of the Arjun tank will be covered up. The mainstream media, which CIA-RAW control, have made no mention of the black box -- which was like the flight data recorder in aircraft -- installed by DRDO in Arjun tanks and the shocking findings about the sabotage. There is across the board sabotage by various means by CIA-RAW to keep India down technologically, economically and militarily. RAW's grip over India is comparable to the old KGB's grip over the Soviet Union, with the difference that whereas the KGB worked for the good of the Soviet Union, except toward the end, RAW has always worked for its imperialist paymasters. The role of politicians in governing India is insignificant compared to that of CIA-RAW (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ ) but RAW has no place in the public's consciousness or in discussions of public affairs in India.
An important point about the sabotage of Arjun is that people on the Arjun discussion thread on Bharat-Rakshak were aghast at the Army's behavior and calling for Army brass being tried for treason, etc. but it will be a mistake to stop with the Army; it is RAW which is behind such sabotage not just of Arjun but of India's interests, technological, economic and other, in a lot of areas. RAW has operatives in the Army at various levels but it is necessary to go to the root of the problem. RAW has to be destroyed and I have suggested that a brand new external intelligence agency be formed with the help of military intelligence (RAW is supposed to be India's external intelligence agency but at least 90% of its activities are within India, against India).
FURTHER ADDED JULY 13, 2008: After the addendum below, K. Subrahmanyam left a comment on my article titled “Imminent end of ‘White’ rule over India” at merinews.com . He has been a kingpin of C.I.A. operations in India for decades, responsible for setting up the LTTE, etc. to promote separatism first in Sri Lanka then in India.
ADDED JULY 13, 2008: Concerning what I said below “he is as far above you as you may be above cockroaches (see his blog)”, a few specific examples:
Regarding Times of India’s editorial head Gautam Adhikari and so-called ‘strategic analyst’ K. Subrahmanyam I said on July 9 ‘08 in a blog ( http://o3.indiatimes.com/GautamAdhikariPieceOfDogfaeces ):
Gautam Adhikari Is A Filthy Criminal Piece Of Dog-Faeces
If he had stayed in the United States, he would have been eaten by the Americans who will be eating each other after India's nuclear first strike on the United States (see http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com/ ); if he stays in India, since he is unfit even to be made into dog-food, he will be ground up and made into fertiliser to grow onions, stinking onions.
K. Subrahmanyam's protein is too rancid to eat in normal times but if he flees to the United States, they will gobble up this nigger blackie slave, including his innards and bones. In India he will be thrown into the same hopper as Adhikari and ground up for fertiliser.
Regarding Manmohan Singh, I said on July 8 ‘08 in a blog ( http://manmohansinghbushsservant.blogspot.com/ ) :
Manmohan Singh -- Bush's Servant
Manmohan Singh will drive over two hours, starting at 5 A.M., for a 35 minute, pre-breakfast meeting with Bush at Bush's hotel, from 7:40 A.M. to 8:15 A.M. Do you think Bush will drive over two hours, starting at 5 A.M., to meet Manmohan Singh? Why didn't he tell Bush to come and meet him at his hotel? This filthy criminal, whose sole loyalty is to the white master, injures India in every possible way. Ideally his skin should be rrripped off his torso and used to hang him but, for efficiency, he will die in the nuclear blast that will destroy New Delhi (see the blog India's Nuclear Supremacy Over the United States).
Posted by Satish Chandra at 5:39 PM 0 comments
ADDED JULY 12, 2008: The following post on bharat-rakshak.com is relevant to what is said below:
sanjaychoudhry
Post subject: Re: Psy ops and Media watch
Posted: 12 Jul 2008 05:43 pm
　
BRFite
Joined: 12 Jul 2007 07:09 pmPosts: 807Location: La La Land
Satish Chandra has hit back at critics.
Quote:
There were no more than about 80,000 British, women and children included, in India at any time. This tiny nation, from half way around the world, ruled India for centuries. With a thousand year history of slavery to various foreign invaders, it is not surprising that Indians are extremely stupid in defence matters (see my article 'India's technological and economic emancipation'). It is my task to educate them. Those who would like to be educated should go to my blog titled "Nuclear Supremacy For India Over US". But traitors, of whom there are plenty in India, cannot be educated, only shot. A nuclear detonation in New Delhi is an efficient way to get rid of the traitors. When the Soviet Union fought Hitler's armies in World War II, it took steps that resulted in the deaths of millions of its own countrymen but those steps were necessary to save the country as a whole. The destruction of New Delhi is similarly necessary to save India as a whole. As for the abusive comments about the author: he is as far above you as you may be above cockroaches (see his blog).http://india.merinews.com/commentAll.jsp?articleID=137314
Quote:
Some of the comments here are examples of the ignorant and enslaved 'inferior Indian n i g g e r s' who are the rule rather the exception in India and in my blog cited in my other comment I have written about how India can attain nuclear supremacy over the United States despite such people.http://www.merinews.com/catFull.jsp?articleID=137436 Last edited by sanjaychoudhry on 12 Jul 2008 05:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
　
　
ADDED JULY 9, 2008: I said below:
"Both the BJP and the Left show they have gross misconceptions and naivete about the government's behavior in the nuclear deal because of which they are letting slip the only opportunity they have to block the nuclear deal -- passing a private member's bill by a simple majority that prohibits IAEA inspections of any facilities that were not under such inspections on January 1 '06, for example and this opportunity will be gone once the Monsoon session ends -- and are pursuing ineffective measures because of their naivete about what the government's behavior is going to be and what the stakes are for the C.I.A., whose dictates Manmohan Singh is following, because of which no precedents -- such as "we will force govt. to set up JPC on nuke deal ... recalled that joint parliamentary committees were finally set up on the Bofors deal and the security scam after initial refusal by then government" (The Hindu, Sept. 6 '07, Internet) -- apply and, even more naively, "Karat felt Parliament should discuss the nuclear issue... [that] will be the best way to make sure that this deal is not proceeded with ... [how] can a government go against a majority in Parliament (The Hindu, Sept. 6 '07, Internet), as if the government does not know a majority in Parliament is against it or does not know the implications of the Hyde Act, etc., on which the Left plans to 'educate' the government and as if discussions, either in Parliament or in the UPA-Left committee will make any difference to what the government will do, which is hustle the deal through regardless of all this. Getting the nuclear deal through is such a high stakes matter for the United States and the C.I.A. -- and Manmohan Singh will give his life for the Americans and the C.I.A. as will Vajpayee who is probably the one misleading the BJP politicians , telling them they can "force the govt." to appoint the JPC, etc. -- that none of these will work. The only way to block the deal is to pass a private member's bill such as that suggested above which will effectively block the nuclear deal (as is shown in the one-sentence draft provided above, there need not be any reference to the nuclear deal at all in such a bill). Another example of such a private member's bill is " To safeguard India's sovereignty and self-reliance, there shall be no construction of imported nuclear reactors in India beyond the imported reactors in operation or under construction in India on January 1, 2007". The watchword is to block the deal by means that do NOT require any cooperation or concurrence of the government. Passing one of the private member's bills suggested here (though both can also be passed) can be done by a simple majority of the NDA, Left and UNPA and does not require any cooperation or concurrence of the government. Also, by a simple majority vote, the Monsoon session can be extended, if necessary, till such a bill is passed. None of the examples given here refer to the nuclear deal but will, in effect, make it impossible to implement or proceed with the nuclear deal, forcing its abandonment."
An example of Manmohan Singh pushing the deal through regardless of what the politicians do is reports from Reuters and PTI today -- July 9, 2008 -- that India has sent the IAEA agreement for approval on July 9 '08 despite Pranab Mukherjee saying just a day earlier that the government will not do so until after it has won a parliamentary vote of confidence and while the safeguards agreement is being kept secret from the Indian people on bogus grounds. Among the many, many politicians, scientists (such as Kakodkar) and others who have been bribed is Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee who said Parliament has no role in the matter (see what I have said below about the powers of Parliament). All this is an expression of the white man’s military strength and will be dealt with by the destruction of New Delhi and then of the United States by nuclear weapons.
ADDED JULY 6, 2008: It needs to be emphasized that even today the range of India’s Agni III missile is more than three times its stated range; with a one tonne (1,000 kilogram) throw weight (this includes warheads, decoys, release and guidance mechanisms for warheads, etc.), its range is over ten thousand kilometers (see the missile section of bharat-rakshak.com); with light weight thermonuclear warheads -- India’s strategic warheads are supposed to weigh from 100 to 250 kilograms -- it can hit any point on Earth. Its range during the recent test was deliberately reduced by various means such as a large throw weight (one and a half tonnes), using an angle of flight that reduces range, in-flight braking, etc. Even without the enhancements already developed or soon to be available, India can hit any point on the territory of the United States with its nuclear armed missiles. The industrial facilities for their mass production are already in place. The scientists have done all this despite the obstacles created by the traitor politicians. A lot more testing of both missiles and warheads -- the missiles should be tested to their full ranges and the warheads to their full yields -- is a must but the politicians have been blocking this.
The Centre for Advanced Technology (CAT) near Indore was created at the same time as the Integrated Guided Missiles Program, as an integral part of India’s strategic program; both were created in response to the same letter of mine to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December, 1982. If it has been dismantled -- partly or otherwise -- under the United States’ dictates, that is an extremely serious matter.
DRDO’s critical laboratories and facilities are already far away from New Delhi; whatever is in or around New Delhi should also be shifted far away and the headquarters should be in Hyderabad. What is in New Delhi is mostly bureaucratic paperwork; there may not be time to move that out before New Delhi’s destruction nor is it necessary. People can be out and far away in a matter of hours.
After the destruction of New Delhi, India’s government will be in Hyderabad and its contact number will be the telephone number of DRDO. As I have said below, a skeletal staff of just a few dozen, based in Hyderabad, can perform the functions of the Central Government -- giving instructions to and answering questions from the State governments and other entities and providing them with funds in accordance with my proposal about money ( described below).
ADDED JULY 3, 2008: A note about hate: in army training, for example in bayonet practice, you are taught to hate the enemy; it is essential if you are to survive and win. On Bharat Rakshak forum, the operatives of CIA-RAW, through the numerous anti-muslim, anti-Pakistan threads they nurture, direct the aggression of Indians toward other Indians (which is what Pakistanis are) while they suppress any mention of the necessity to defend against the real enemy -- the white man and the most powerful white country, the United States. In a letter to the press in 1998, just before Vajpayee assumed office as prime minister, I wrote, referring to I. K. Gujral's statement as prime minister about the necessity for Indians to "inculcate" the scientific spirit in themselves, about the necessity for Indians to inculcate in themselves "hatred for the white man (and woman)", to which Vajpayee replied "Hate is not on the agenda", to which I replied that this amounted to saying "Defence is not on the agenda". The agenda remains unfulfilled. It will move ahead with the destruction of New Delhi with a nuclear detonation and will be fulfilled with the delivery of ten thousand nuclear warheads to the continental United States territory.
ADDED APRIL 17, 2008: Imminent end of white rule over India:
The days or even hours of white rule over India are now numbered; it can be destroyed at any time of DRDO’s choosing.
ADDED APRIL 16, 2008: DRDO’s Task (contd.) : Options for Delivery, Yield & Type of Nuclear Weapon :
New Delhi is the seat of the white man’s continuing rule over India. In destroying it with a single nuclear detonation, options for delivery range from hand-delivery to cars and other vehicles to missiles. Various options exist as to yield and type of nuclear weapon.
ADDED APRIL 13, 2008: DRDO’s Task (contd.) : Efficiency of a single nuclear detonation in removing traitors:
Not all traitors are alike. Indian traitors are nigger blackie slaves of the white man who are comfortable in an inferior, master-slave relationship to the white man. As I have said below regarding the couple dozen non-politicians including six former service chiefs, in India such inferior Indian niggers are the rule rather than the exception. Instead of shooting them, it is efficient to get rid of such obstructors of India’s nuclear supremacy over the United States by means of a single nuclear detonation centered on RAW headquarters.
ADDED APRIL 11, 2008: DRDO’s Task (contd.) :
Further testing, WITHOUT DELAY, is not optional but essential. India must not only test thermonuclear weapons to their full yields, thermonuclear weapons with multi-megaton yields must be tested, on India-owned islands, even if India’s ICBMs are to be mainly equipped with multiple warheads of only up to 300 kilotons each and have available thermonuclear warheads proven with repeated explosive tests -- not just computer-simulated tests -- with a spectrum of yields and to provide for various contingencies as to delivery such as, for example, having to destroy a city the size of New York with a single bomb. As I have said, neutron-type weapons that will be effective over as large an area as possible per warhead -- for use against cities and population centers, not as battlefield weapons against armour -- must be designed and tested. Overground testing will also be necessary for neutron-type weapons, for which India must renounce the applicable treaty. Dozens of nuclear weapons tests are necessary in the immediate future.
A traitor has just been appointed head of the National Security Advisory Board to further undermine India’s national security. The destruction of traitors has to precede everything else.
ADDED MARCH 30, 2008: DRDO’s task:
DRDO's central task is delivering thousands of pure fusion bombs ( see my article in Cental Chronicle, Bhopal: http://www.centralchronicle.com/20080329/2903307.htm ) or other thermonuclear weapons to the continental United States territory. DRDO will fulfil this task. Equally important is DRDO's task, along with the nuclear scientists', of ridding India of traitors. As I have said, a single nuclear detonation, centered on RAW headquarters, will rid India of RAW, the traitor politicians and civil servants and the top brass of the worse than worthless military. A skeletal staff of just a few dozen based in Hyderabad can perform the functions of the Central Government -- giving instructions to and answering questions from the State governments and other entities and providing them with funds in accordance with my proposal about money ( described in http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ ). Insofar as there is the slightest uncertainty about the yield and reliability of India's thermonuclear weapons -- or even if there is not -- further testing should be done.
ADDED FEBRUARY 1, 2008 through MARCH 27, 2008: In this addendum, I
i) explain what is meant by “nuclear supremacy”;
ii) show why attaining nuclear supremacy over the United States will be a cake walk for India;
Iii) show why the military and the politicians must obey and take orders from DRDO which is India’s true defender and guardian and how DRDO can get rid of the traitors if they do not;
iv) describe the manner of death of India’s three hundred million American enemies;
v) point out that traitors cannot be educated, only shot or otherwise killed.
I. The following are my posts in an online discussion whose subject was “How DRDO failed India’s military” :-
i) (January 20 ‘08) I graduated from IIT, Kharagpur in 1966 and was nominated by the department head for the best Institute graduate of the year award. If the kind of work DRDO is turning out on missiles and missile defence systems -- I have worked in Research & Development for a United States aerospace giant and I cannot tell you how proud I am of what they are doing which, I am sure, will lead to India's nuclear supremacy over the United States, which I have been advocating, in the not too distant future -- is by third class B.Sc. and M.Sc. graduates, we need more such third class graduates. From Engineering I went into Psychology and it is my professional opinion that, on the whole, Indians are intellectually the most capable people in the world -- see my letter to the press titled 'B. F. Skinner's plagiarism' on my web page, http://www.psychotherapy.eboard.com/ -- and attaining nuclear supremacy over the United States will be a cake walk for India once the nation starts working for this objective as, in fact, it has started to do.
ii) (January 20 ‘08) Regarding the question from ajay_ijn as to what is nuclear supremacy: during the Cold war, the United States and the Soviet Union were said to be in a relationship of 'Mutual Assured Destruction' (MAD), meaning if either side launched a first nuclear strike on the other to destroy the other's nuclear weapons, cities, etc., the other side will have enough nuclear weapons survive the first strike to obliterate the side which launched the first strike. The purpose of the anti-ballistic missile treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union was to preserve this state of mutual assured destruction, so that neither side will have an incentive to launch a first strike on the other. A few years ago, the United States unilaterally got out of the anti-ballistic missile treaty and started developing systems to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles. An article in Foreign Affairs magazine about a year ago said that the United States is now close to nuclear supremacy over Russia, or already has nuclear supremacy, because it can now launch a first strike against Russia and destroy all its nuclear weapons or its ability to launch them because of a severe degradation in the number and readiness of Russia's nuclear weapons after the disintegration of the Soviet Union and thus destroy Russia with a first strike without being destroyed in return. DRDO scientists have said that the systems to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles (of short and medium range) they just tested are superior to those the United States has and within 3 years they will have systems to shoot down ballistic missiles of intercontinental range (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles, or ICBMs) such as the ICBMs the United States has (the United States does not and will not have the ability to destroy large numbers of incoming ICBMs). By saying that India will have nuclear supremacy over the United States, I am saying India will be able to launch a first strike against the United States and destroy it without being destroyed in return. I have dealt with the 'how' of nuclear supremacy for India over the United States elsewhere ( http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com/ ).According to a UNI report dated January 18, 2008, the DRDO "today emphatically denied that it had sought any American help for the country's indigenous ballistic missile defence project... "We need no external assistance in our endeavour, which is progressing well" ". Reports in the Indian press to this effect (for example, PTI reports titled 'India in talks with U.S. for ballistic missile defence' and 'India Eyes Missile Defence System from US Firm') were put out by India's enemies (which include powerful forces within the Indian government) to bring India's missile and missile defence development under American control and destroy it, just as the nuclear deal is meant to destroy India's nuclear weapons capabilities. These enemies of India will also be destroyed.
iii) (January 20 ‘08) I said I am proud of the work DRDO is doing -- that should have been clear if you read the sentence in full -- and mentioned the American aerospace giant to indicate I have seen American research and development in the defence field. My reference to intellectual capability was to the intellectual capability of "Indians", not that of any particular individual, as is also clear if you read what was actually said. The postings above mine had referred to IIT graduates and called DRDO employees third rate B.Sc. and M.Sc. graduates; that is why I indicated that my comments about being proud of the work of DRDO employees were from an IIT graduate.
iv) (January 20 ‘08) If you read what I actually wrote, I said DRDO has said that systems for defence against ballistic missiles of intercontinental range will be developed in the next three years. You have to learn to read more carefully.Just as is being done in the nuclear deal, foreign help is shoved down India's throat to keep India from developing its own capabilities; for example, it was proposed to import an Israeli medium range air defence missile for $2.5 billion because 'the Akash program has not delivered on time', without spending even one tenth of that amount on the Akash program. If, instead of spending huge sums of money on imports, those amounts are spent on indigenous research and development, including radars such as you mentioned, there will be no need for the Israeli radar.I have already referred to the PTI report, which you cite, about DRDO allegedly seeking U.S. help for missile defence and the fact that this has been emphatically denied by DRDO. Again, you have to learn to read more carefully. The link you gave is to this PTI report as it appears on Bharat Rakshak. I sent Bharat Rakshak the UNI report of DRDO emphatically denying the allegation in the PTI report, requesting that they post the UNI report on Bharat Rakshak. They did not and, instead, re-posted the PTI report a second time! Control over the media, including online forums such as Bharat Rakshak, not just the print and broadcast media, is an important part of what India's enemies do with the help of Indians on their payroll and this is an example of such control. This does not mean that people posting on Bharat Rakshak in general are traitors; foreign intelligence agencies just need a few people in key positions to control the media.The problem is not jingoism, the problem is Indians' 'inferiority complex' (to use this expression in the popular sense) and India's enemies try, with the help of people on their payrolls in India, to keep it that way and to prevent India from getting out of slavery to the white man. Shoving American 'help' down India's throat for missile defence, as I have pointed out above, is the latest example of this.
v) (January 20 ‘08) The white man's claim of intellectual superiority is an important part of the white man's imperialism and is used to justify all kinds of crimes and a master-slave relationship with countries like India. Therefore, it is important to assert Indians' intellectual superiority, which is real.
vi) (January 20 ‘08) ( UNI report from webindia123.com )DRDO denies US help for ballistic missile defence projectNew Delhi Friday, Jan 18 2008 ISTThe Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) today emphatically denied that it had sought any American help for the country's indigenous ballistic missile defence project.Reacting to reports that US defence major Lockheed Martin was ''in touch'' with the DRDO on this issue, the organisation's Chief Controller (R&D), Dr Prahlad totally denied the news or that the DRDO needed any help.''We need no external assistance in our endeavour, which is progressing well,'' he asserted.Reports had quoted Lockheed Martin's International Air and Missile Defence Strategic Initiatives' (IAMSD) -- which makes the Patriot-III system for the US -- vice president Dennis D Cavin as saying his firm was in talks with the DRDO.The DRDO had earlier this month claimed that its missile defence system was much better and capable then the American 'Patriot.' Dr Prahlad had termed the American system at least 20 years behind current technology, as well being costly. The main brain behind the ballistic missile defence programme and DRDO Chief Controller V K Saraswat had earlier asserted that their system would be up and running in three years time.-- (UNI) -- 18DI59.xml
vii) (January 21 ‘08) The author of the article that is the subject of this thread ('How DRDO failed India's military'), running down DRDO, is editor of Indian Defence Review of Lancer Publications which also sponsors Bharat Rakshak; American control over Indian media is by no means limited to these two media organs and suppressing Indian research and development in the defence field and bringing it under American control is a major preoccupation of U.S. intelligence agencies, pursued with the help of Indian politicians and India's Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India.
viii) (January 22 ‘08) For the United States, striving for nuclear supremacy over all nations of the world is an axiom of its foreign policy. An example of the United States' determination to prevent India from emerging out of slavery is in the following report from The Guardian of January 22 '08 where a former Chairman of the United States' Joint Chiefs of Staff and others talk of a nuclear first strike on India (without actually naming it) to keep it in a state of slavery:-"The west must be ready to resort to a pre-emptive nuclear attack to try to halt the "imminent" spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, according to a radical manifesto for a new Nato by five of the west's most senior military officers and strategists.Calling for root-and-branch reform of Nato and a new pact drawing the US, Nato and the European Union together in a "grand strategy" to tackle the challenges of an increasingly brutal world, the former armed forces chiefs from the US, Britain, Germany, France and the Netherlands insist that a "first strike" nuclear option remains an "indispensable instrument" since there is "simply no realistic prospect of a nuclear-free world".The manifesto has been written following discussions with active commanders and policymakers, many of whom are unable or unwilling to publicly air their views. It has been presented to the Pentagon in Washington and to Nato's secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, over the past 10 days. The proposals are likely to be discussed at a Nato summit in Bucharest in April."The risk of further [nuclear] proliferation is imminent and, with it, the danger that nuclear war fighting, albeit limited in scope, might become possible," the authors argued in the 150-page blueprint for urgent reform of western military strategy and structures. "The first use of nuclear weapons must remain in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction."The authors - General John Shalikashvili, the former chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff and Nato's ex-supreme commander in Europe, General Klaus Naumann, Germany's former top soldier and ex-chairman of Nato's military committee, General Henk van den Breemen, a former Dutch chief of staff, Admiral Jacques Lanxade, a former French chief of staff, and Lord Inge, field marshal and ex-chief of the general staff and the defence staff in the UK - paint an alarming picture of the threats and challenges confronting the west in the post-9/11 world and deliver a withering verdict on the ability to cope."What if the United States makes a nuclear first strike on India well before India has developed a first strike capability against it -- such as making a nuclear strike on India this year? Such 'counterproliferation' nuclear strikes have been part of the United States' policy for many years and there is nothing really new in the above recommendation. For many years now, India has had nuclear-armed submarines capable of obliterating the United States' largest cities on its coasts within striking range of its coastal cities at all times, so the United States can make a 'counterproliferation' strike on India only at the cost of losing its largest cities. I have said that India can win an arms race with the United States; India produces about half a million engineering graduates per year against the United States' seventy thousand and I have shown how India has an unlimited amount of investment capital for the necessary research, development and production, which will also greatly benefit its economy as a whole, via my proposal about money in my blog http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com/ . As I have said in this blog, India has no alternative but to attain nuclear supremacy over the United States and eliminate this threat. All that is needed is a clear cut national commitment to this objective.
ix) (January 22 ‘08) The United States considers India's own nuclear program to be an instance of proliferation.When India conducted its 1998 nuclear tests, an American analyst with the Heritage Foundation had publicly recommended that the United States make counterproliferation strikes on India to eliminate its nuclear weapons program. It was then that the BJP government started a series of meetings with Strobe Talbott of the United States State Department to mollify the United States. As part of it, India even allowed U.S. helicopters to monitor India's nuclear installations in Kalpakkam. The unspoken threat of eliminating India's nuclear capabilities by means of such strikes is always present; the nuclear deal is an example of an attempt to establish American control over India's nuclear program by other means. If such attempts do not succeed, there is the threat of military strikes, including nuclear strikes.
x) (January 22 ‘08) A 'responsible player' for the United States is a country that behaves like its colony. Old story or not, it is a continuing story which boils down to an insistence on a master-slave relationship with non-white countries such as India. I gave the events after the 1998 tests only as an example.The law of the jungle still prevails in international relations. Striving for military supremacy -- which in this age means nuclear supremacy -- over all nations needs no explanation; its necessity is as obvious as the fact that water flows downwards. Only a country such as India with a thousand year history of slavery to various foreign invaders is unable to see the obvious.Through the nuclear deal, the United States is saying "Drop dead or I will kill you". The nuclear deal has not been made yet and India has not yet dropped dead.Expressions such as "US knows India is a responsible player" and "US has full confidence in India" imply a superior-inferior relationship in which India has to satisfy the U.S. and keep it happy -- which requires that India remain vulnerable to being destroyed by the United States any time if it does not do what the United States wants it to do in any sphere. Only a people who have been enslaved for a thousand years will be comfortable with such a situation. Unfortunately, such is the present day psychology of Indians. Such a slave mentality of Indians can only be changed by India attaining nuclear supremacy over the United States because it is by military means that slavery to the white man has been imposed on India (slave mentality comes about when people on whom slavery has been imposed are no longer struggling against it but accept it as the normal state of affairs; Indians would never think this way -- like slaves -- in relation to other non-white countries, such as Pakistan or China, but only in relation to the white master).
xi) (January 24 ‘08) The same behavior can have more than one possible explanations; my assertion of the role of race (white/non-white) in determining the United States' behavior toward Indians and India is based on observations made as a behavior scientist in the United States where I have lived for 41 years [see the biography of Satish Chandra -- that's me -- in Marquis' Who's Who In America, 2008 and earlier editions]. What you refer to as beneficial American 'aid' is actually poison; it is neither needed nor desirable and keeps India from developing its own capabilities. In the nuclear deal, it is not even aid but slavery. The aggressiveness of the United States toward non-white countries is such that there is no option for India but to attain nuclear supremacy over it and put this mad dog to sleep (meaning death). This is the reality and there is nothing very surprising about it. There is no need for India to be another Iran; India has four times the population of the United States and produces 7 times the number of engineers per year that the United States does. It is the effect of a thousand years of slavery and the British rule because of which Indians think of India as an Iran which needs to be afraid of the United States.To repeat: geopolitics, so far as it concerns India and the West, is all about white vs. non-white. The role of race within India can be seen from this: according to the post office that serves the area where a lot of politicians live, Sonia gets over 50,000 letters per month. Manmohan Singh and Advani get less than 2,500 each. Vajpayee, when prime minister, got less than 1,000. The sole reason for this is that she is white. The terrorization and subjugation to the white man that Indians underwent through the holocaust perpetrated by the British after 1857, killing over 10 million in 10 years (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ ), is responsible for this fact. The result is the inferior Indian niggers, criminal blackie slaves that Kipling and others wrote about -- and their writings are still prescribed reading in Indian schools! Indians by and large think of themselves as inferior Indian niggers in relation to the white man and this is evident in a thousand ways from their behavior (after I had made this posting, I found in The Telegraph of January 25 '08, a column by Swapan Dasgupta beginning with a quotation from Kipling and he says in this column: "it is undeniable that India’s perceptions of Britons were couched in terms of admiration, reverence, awe and a tinge of fear. This was as true for Anglophiles as they were for those who suffered and fought for freedom. Of course, there was a flip side too. The white man was felt to be lacking in personal hygiene and his food habits were completely suspect. Nevertheless, on balance, the sahib came out of the encounter as someone who had earned the right to forge an empire. It, therefore, followed that if Indians were to usurp that right they would have to imbibe the virtues of hard work, forbearance, team spirit, enterprise and sacrifice. A minority of Indians also wanted fair play and decency to be tagged to the attributes of good character". India's "leaders" that you thank God for are more or less the inferior Indian niggers this columnist is). This will only change after India attains nuclear supremacy over the most powerful white country and eliminates the threat it poses to countries like India.
xii) (January 25 ‘08) In fact this PTI report has been "emphatically denied" by DRDO in the UNI report I posted above (posting # 46 above) which says DRDO has NOT sought any American help with its ballistic missile defence program and does not need any American help. Far from being in favor of DRDO, this PTI report implies that DRDO is inferior and needs such help. DRDO has said "We need no external assistance in our endeavour, which is progressing well".
xiii) (January 25 ‘08) The bottom line is that India must have military supremacy over all nations of the world -- which in this age means nuclear supremacy -- and since the United States is the most powerful nation in the world today, India's principal task is to attain nuclear supremacy over the United States and that cannot be attained by depending on the United States or other countries for 'aid'; India is quite capable of attaining nuclear supremacy over the United States and articles such as the one that is the subject of this thread try to prevent it by falsely running DRDO down, promoting foreign dependence and imports, etc., and this is part of the tactics foreign intelligence agencies use, through Indians on their payroll, to keep India down.India has no shortage of manpower and my proposal about money (described in http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/) can be used to make India both militarily and economically number 1 in the world but military supremacy -- that is, nuclear supremacy -- is even more important than economic supremacy because, without it, it can be subjugated and enslaved (let's leave out who does the subjugation and enslavement). All of the invaders who conquered and enslaved India came from much poorer countries than 'the Golden Hind'.DRDO is doing great work, but that does not mean things can't be even better. I have said that India should set up ten parallel DRDOs, each the size of the present DRDO and let three of them compete for a successful tank design, three for a successful figher plane and so on and let the best design win. The Soviet Union had a system of internal competition between government-owned design and production organisations of this kind and it can work for India also (though I don't think DRDO's work has suffered due to a lack of competition; having ten times as many people work on defence R & D may simply enable ten times as many things to be done). Another important point is that weapons such as tanks and fighter planes which carry human beings are a lot more difficult to design and produce than, say, intercontinental ballistic missiles which give a million times or more returns for the same investment of time and effort ('bang for the buck') so far as increasing a country's military power is concerned. Since India's principal aim should be nuclear supremacy, it should focus on designing and producing intercontinental ballistic missiles more than tanks and fighter planes; if you have nuclear supremacy over the United States, most other defence-related issues will take care of themselves. And, as I said, designing and building ICBMs that will do the job can be done a lot faster and require fewer resources, though India has the resources to build both ICBMs and tanks and fighter planes. The main advantage of focusing on ICBMs is time; it will bring India military supremacy a lot sooner than giving a lot of attention to tanks and fighter planes (which will never bring India military supremacy over the United States). Another point is that although India should build nuclear-propelled, nuclear-armed submarines carrying intercontinental ballistic missiles (SSBNs), like the ATV it is building, building these weapons platforms (SSBNs) is a lot more time and resource-consuming than building ICBMs that can be launched from road and rail-mobile vehicles. It is a mistake to make India's nuclear arsenal primarily a second strike resource (which is what SSBNs are good at); India's nuclear arsenal should primarily be for a first strike -- that is how you gain nuclear supremacy, by being able to carry out a successful first strike -- and a sufficiently large arsenal of road and rail-mobile ICBMs can be produced a lot faster than an arsenal based on SSBNs. Again, time is important. This does not mean India should not produce SSBNs, just that the emphasis should be on producing a large number of road and rail-mobile ICBMs. I also believe that India's anti-ballistic missile systems will be considerably better than those of the United States -- as DRDO has correctly said, its systems to defend against short and medium range missiles are already better than those of the United States -- if India can avoid sabotage by politicians and RAW on the C.I.A.'s payroll who try to shove american 'help' down India's throat. This is another reason India can afford to focus on road and rail-mobile ICBMs rather than on SSBNs (SSBNs are inherently difficult to destroy; with a really effective ABM system, India's road and rail-mobile ICBMs will also be difficult to destroy). Avoiding foreign 'help' is not a matter of 'false pride'; avoiding foreign help is essential for India's nuclear supremacy.Instead of ICBMs, India's nuclear weapons may primarily be delivered by the hyperplane (Avatar) under development. And its defence against enemy ICBMs may be provided by the space-based weapons, Durga (Directionally Unrestricted Ray-Gun Array) and Kali (Kinetic Attack Loitering Interceptor) systems.
xiv) (January 25 ‘08) Your doubt is based on ignorance. You should read, study and absorb posting #s 55 and 57 and the link contained within #55 before you comment on either DRDO or my proposal about money or anything else.
xv) (January 26 ‘08) The problem is not DRDO; the problem is India's Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India and, among other things, sabotages India's defence research and development in various ways. It even used to sabotage India's Mig-21 planes on behalf of the Americans (see the link in posting # 55). It is a mammoth organisation with just the number of joint secretaries in the hundreds; it is India's real 'government' and is dedicated to keeping India under American boots. I have pointed out (see same link in posting # 55) that the Soviet Union was brought down by bringing large sections of the KGB on the C.I.A.'s payroll. RAW has been loyal to its imperialist paymasters from the beginning. India's problems, including DRDO's, will only be solved when all RAW employees are machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches (see same link in posting # 55).
xvi) (February 14 ‘08) RAW exercises extensive control over the Indian media -- print, broadcast and online forums -- and the article that is the subject of this thread was sponsored by C.I.A.-RAW.
xvii) (February 16 ‘08) In evaluating the DRDO, one has to keep in mind at all times DRDO's mission, which is to provide India military supremacy -- which in this age means nuclear supremacy -- over all nations of the world; since the most powerful nation in the world is the United States, it means providing India with nuclear supremacy over the United States. In my earlier posts in this thread I have said what "nuclear supremacy" means and spelled out some consequences of this -- such as an emphasis on designing and producing large numbers of road and rail-mobile ICBMs in the shortest possible time rather than paying a lot of attention to tanks and fighter planes, though India has the resources to do both, and said how well DRDO is doing in designing long range missiles and missile defence systems. ICBMs and missile defence (ABM) systems are also a lot easier to design and produce and they provide a million times or more 'bang for the buck', compared to tanks and fighter planes, so far as increasing India's military power is concerned.
xviii) (February 21 ‘08) A headline in The Guardian of February 22 '08 says "US rushes to get slice of $45 bn Indian arms pie". Oh what couldn't DRDO do if this money were pumped into it and into Indian production units! This amount includes $10 billion just for 126 lousy jet fighters. Since the money pumped into DRDO and Indian production units will mostly be in rupees, not dollars, even more, much more, money could be pumped into them than the equivalent of $45 billion. THAT will buy real defence; imported arms don't buy you defence. When the United States or Russia need a new weapon system, they NEVER think of buying it from another country; India almost always thinks of nothing but where to buy it from rather than of expanding its research and development activities to develop and produce it at home. There is absolutely no justification for this, with India producing seven times the engineers per year the United States does, except a bad habit, a colonial mind set and the treason of politicians and others who obey their foreign masters and will lose the kickbacks they get by buying from abroad and, above all, the treason of RAW to keep India under imperialist boots.
xix) (February 27 ‘08) DRDO are India's real warriors, not the military. In the old days, the sword-makers could make the swords, but warriors had to wield them. Even today's tanks and fighter planes need warriors to drive or fly them. But DRDO, along with the nuclear scientists and production units such as Bharat Dynamics, can make nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles and the people who do the research and development and production can also push the button to send them off to obliterate the enemy. The military muscle from nuclear-tipped ICBMs is milllions of times greater than the power of tanks and fighter planes. The scientists and engineers are also the real soldiers. They should have their hand on the nuclear button, not the military or the politicians. The military simply obey the politicians and India's politicians are all traitors on the payrolls of the C.I.A. etc. The military are not needed to launch the nuclear-tipped ICBMs; that can be done by scientists and engineers pushing a button sitting at a desk. The tanks and fighter planes the military can drive/fly are insignificant and nearly worthless in the military power they provide. Since they (the military) also obey the traitor politicians and civil servants, they are worse than worthless. It is time scientists and engineers are recognised for what they are -- the true defenders and guardians of the country.The military should obey and take orders from DRDO; the same for civil servants and politicians. This can be done by amending the Constitution; if the politicians don't agree to amending the Constitution, it can be done in other ways.
xx) (March 5 ‘08) Sometimes killing traitors within the country is necessary before an external enemy can be dealt with. In this nuclear age, a nuclear solution can deal with traitors within the country. A single nuclear detonation, arranged by DRDO and the nuclear scientists, centered on RAW headquarters will rid India of RAW, the traitor politicians and civil servants and the top brass of the worse than worthless military. Since there are very few DRDO and nuclear installations around New Delhi, India’s military and economic strength will not be damaged.
xxi) (March 23 ‘08) India’s nuclear supremacy and microwaves from satellites:
In a letter to the press a few years ago, I referred to Indians’ lack of appreciation of the importance of research and of scientists and gave an example of the Japanese in World War II thinking they had equaled the Americans in aircraft carriers, fighter planes and the rest and the Americans then came out with the atom bomb. In my addendum dated February 26, 2006, titled “National security crisis due to microwaves from satellites” below I described the threat to national security from microwaves from satellites. On the Bharat Rakshak online forum, an American who seems a C.I.A. specialist on India is asking that India acquiesce in a United States’ invasion and permanent occupation of Pakistan (and later of India). He says “even at the moment for example … Pakistan’s air-defenses have been electronically neutralized to allow the ingress of predator drones” and that “the USA has already electronically neutralized the Pakistani nuclear capabilities. The weapons are also dispersed in bits and pieces with no possibility of ever putting even one of these together. Doing so would invite a massive conventional or nuclear response from the USA. Only taking physical control and destruction of these weapons remains which should pose no major problems as the Pakistan armed forces are fully co-operative”. The electronic neutralisation of Pakistan’s air defences and nuclear weapons has almost certainly been done by microwaves from satellites as I said in the addendum dated February 26 ‘06 below can be done. India’s missiles and nuclear weapons can presumably be similarly disabled by microwaves from satellites but shielding them and other equipment from microwaves from satellites can easily be done with metal foil; communication links for missiles and other equipment may have to be redesigned so they work despite the shielding. DRDO should continue, taking control of the Indian government, toward nuclear supremacy over the United States described below.
In taking control of India’s government, the rule is: anyone in government who is not oriented toward and committed to supremacy over the United States is oriented toward and committed to slavery to the United States and is a traitor deserving death. The orientation toward and commitment to supremacy over the United States must be vocal and explicit. At present India’s government -- for example all civil servants from the top to the bottom -- consists of traitors.
xxii) (March 27 ‘08) Does India have “pure fusion” bombs? :
Shortly after the 1998 nuclear tests, a report in the Indian press quoted a report in a small provincial Russian newspaper as saying that 'India has pure fusion bombs and can do things in the nuclear weapons field that the United States and Russia can only dream of'. In a thermonuclear weapon, a fission trigger made from plutonium or uranium or a combination of the two is needed to create the conditions in which a fusion reaction can take place. In a pure fusion bomb, the fusion reaction is accomplished by other means, such as by lasers. Despite trying, no country so far has been able to create a pure fusion bomb -- leaving out the above report about India having done so. Among the many advantages of pure fusion bombs, no uranium or plutonium is needed for them and their yield can be made the equivalent of thousands of tons of TNT or as little as one or two tons of TNT -- no more than a conventional bomb but this yield can all be in the form of deadly radiation which at present can only be obtained from a neutron bomb that has fairly substantial explosive effects equal to hundreds or thousands or millions of tons of TNT. An attack on the United States by India with thousands of pure fusion bombs will enable India to kill off the population of the United States without creating the side effects that the detonation of thousands of thermonuclear weapons that are not pure fusion weapons will have.Nothing further has been heard about India having pure fusion bombs since the above report. In the absence of any confirmation, it is prudent to proceed on the assumption that India does not have them.Pure fusion bombs will also dispense with the necessity for uranium or plutonium for making weapons. Assuming India does not have pure fusion bombs, an important point is that a virtually unlimited amount of uranium is available from sea water so India has no need to depend on any other country for uranium. If you do a Google search on "uranium sea water", you will find lots of information on this, including facts such as i) Japanese scientists in the 1980s demonstrated the economic viability of obtaining uranium from sea water and, because of increases in the price of uranium since then, it is even more viable today; ii) a U.S. government panel recommended obtaining uranium from sea water and it has not been pursued by the U.S. only because the U.S. has other ready sources of uranium (also because the United States did not want countries like India to tap this source because it will wreck its non-proliferation efforts and attempts at trapping India through the nuclear deal, etc.) ; iii) "The Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Mumbai has developed a method for extracting uranium from sea water, according to the BARC annual report. The BARC method involves passing sea water through a specially made radiation induced polymer that will selectively absorb uranium. Laboratory studies showed that the material could absorb as much as 45 per cent of uranium present in sea water. The report said that on the basis of laboratory data, BARC is getting ready to build, in the first step, a bench scale plant that will produce 100 grams of uranium per year from sea water. Bigger plants will be decided after working out the cost benefit analysis. (Times of India Feb. 25, 2003) " (http://www.wise-uranium.org/). Well, the price of uranium now is such that uranium from sea water will be much cheaper than from other sources. And there is an essentially unlimited amount of uranium ( 4.6 billion tonnes ) available from sea water.
POSTSCRIPT # 1: It needs to be emphasised that India has enough uranium in its known reserves in the ground (which can provide about one hundred thousand tons of yellow cake) that making, say, ten thousand thermonuclear weapons will hardly make a dent in India's known reserves in the ground.
POSTSCRIPT # 2: The report on the U. S. government panel’s recommendation said:
In a report released on August 2, 1999, the The President's Committee Of Advisors On Science And Technology (PCAST ) recommended that the U.S. consider participating in international research on extracting uranium from seawater:
"One possibility for maintaining fission as a major option without reprocessing is low-cost extraction of uranium from seawater. The uranium concentration of sea water is low (approximately 3 ppb) but the quantity of contained uranium is vast - some 4 billion tonnes (about 700 times more than known terrestrial resources recoverable at a price of up to $130 per kg). If half of this resource could ultimately be recovered, it could support for 6,500 years 3,000 GW of nuclear capacity (75 percent capacity factor) based on next-generation reactors (e.g., high-temperature gas-cooled reactors) operated on once-through fuel cycles. Research on a process being developed in Japan suggests that it might be feasible to recover uranium from seawater at a cost of $120 per lb of U3O8.40 Although this is more than 10 times the current uranium price, it would contribute just 0.5¢ per kWh to the cost of electricity for a next-generation reactor operated on a once-through fuel cycle-equivalent to the fuel cost for an oil-fired power plant burning $3-a-barrel oil." [emphasis added]40 Nobukawa 1994: H. Nobukawa "Development of a Floating Type System for Uranium Extraction from Sea Water Using Sea Current and Wave Power," in Proceedings of the 4th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (Osaka, Japan: 10-15 April 1994), pp. 294-300.
Source: Powerful Partnerships: The Federal Role In International Cooperation On Energy Innovation. A Report From The President's Committee Of Advisors On Science And Technology Panel On International Cooperation In Energy Research, Development, Demonstration, And Deployment. Washington, DC, June 1999, p. 5-26 - 5-27 (download full text , 1.3M PDF format)
　
II. The following are my posts from a blog:-
i) (January 10 ‘08) HOW INDIA’S 300 MILLION AMERICAN ENEMIES WILL DIE :-
According to the post office that serves the area where a lot of politicians live, the AIDS woman (Sonia) gets over 50,000 letters per month. Manmohan Singh and Advani get less than 2,500 each. Vajpayee, when prime minister, got less than 1,000. The sole reason for this is that she is white. The terrorization and subjugation to the white man that Indians underwent through the holocaust perpetrated by the British after 1857, killing over 10 million in 10 years (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com ), is responsible for this fact. The result is the inferior Indian niggers, criminal blackie slaves -- unfit even to be made into dog food -- that the Indians named Chetan and Nikhil who have posted comments here exemplify. Nigger blackie slaves like these were blown by the British from the mouths of cannons. Do you think they would have dared to call the British any such names? They are unfit even to be made into dogfood but they can be ground up and made into fertiliser, to grow onions, stinking onions.
The most intelligent, most handsome man on Earth, whose toe nail clippings are worth more to India and the world than the rest of the billion plus Indians combined, does not get even one letter.
A report in The Telegraph of January 10, 2008 says “Sonia....looked pale but the dimples were in place“. No reporters were allowed in her room; how did he know “the dimples were in place“? Like all the other Indian niggers, this bugger would like to dive under her petticoats (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ ) when he is not dreaming of her dimples (this ugly piece of dog-faeces has dimples-- so what? Well, he will answer: SHE IS WHITE!!!!!!!). Vajpayee 'withdrew' as BJP's prime ministerial candidate because of my disclosures that he is a life-long agent of first the British then the C.I.A., that the C.I.A. staged the Kargil war to make him win the election that was pending, etc. (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/). So, grateful to be the BJP's traitor-in-chief after Vajpayee, Advani wrote the current traitor-in-office Manmohan Singh (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ ) asking him to give Vajpayee a Bharat Ratna. Instead, all of them (Vajpayee, Manmohan Singh, Advani) should be split in two lengthwise with an axe on three successive days, their two halves hollowed out, then the AIDS woman should be asked to defecate in their hollowed out torsoes on the three successive days. Before they are split in two, they should be allowed a last wish -- specify what the AIDS woman should eat the day before she defecates in their hollowed out torsoes; they can specify chicken or daal roti or whatever. After sewing the two halves shut, the torsoes should be roasted, sliced into thin slices and served with tea to all the RAW employees as a Republic Day-eve treat. And don't forget to let cabinet ministers Manishankar Aiyar, Health Minister Ramadoss and Science and Technology Minister Sibal, who sit at C.I.A.-supplied terminals to participate in crimes against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, partake of the treat (roasted traitor-torsoes stuffed with dog-faeces). Like all the RAW employees, these criminals will be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches, which will also be the actual punishment of Vajpayee, Manmohan Singh and Advani along with other politicians (see my blog cited above in this paragraph).
After I posted the above, RAW decided that the Bharat Ratna will not go to any politician but to some “renowned” person in some other field. But the Indian whose accomplishments exceed the combined accomplishments of all other Indians is unknown to the public due to the crimes against him by C.I.A.-RAW (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/). RAW is just nigger blackie slaves of the Americans. Only India's nuclear supremacy over the United States and the death of three hundred million American enemies (see my blog cited earlier in this paragraph) will bring him recognition (not that he gives a fig for recognition by criminal blackie slaves or their soon to be vapourised white masters; well, not all will be vapourised; many will be irradiated and eaten by their compatriots who in turn will be eaten by their other compatriots till no one remains alive).
George Bush Sr. said before the first invasion of Iraq that he wanted to restore America's “credibility“ in the Middle East; his son did that with the pictures of Saddam Hussein hanging from a rope, his neck broken. B. F. Skinner, whose plagiarism I exposed ( see my web page, http://www.psychotherapy.eboard.com/ ), with the help of the C.I.A., the American government and media and all Americans, successfully got the cooperation of Indian blackie slaves -- India's government, not just RAW, politicians, cabinet ministers, media, etc. -- in the most heinous crimes against the greatest living Indian. Shifting from open hostility and abuse from their Indian lackeys to “Sirjee“, etc., or various equivalents of 'honey traps', is not going to save them from being machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches. And Bush Sr. may no longer be around to be eaten by his compatriots but Bush Jr. certainly will be. Boy, are the Americans going to have fun! You can depend on it.
C.I.A.-RAW (India's Research and Analysis Wing which functions as an arm of the C.I.A. against India; see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/) controls access to and the number of hits made or shown on my blogs as part of its ongoing crimes against India and the greatest living Indian for the past 31 years. If you visit my blog, sign the register (as a comment) so I know.
For the solution to India's problem that is the white man, click on my blog's URL in the above paragraph.
ii) (January 9 ‘08) Sonia Has Tuberculosis
Her symptoms are consistent with tuberculosis as is the doctors' behavior of completely isolating her (the isolation can continue after she is shifted from the hospital to a specially prepared room at home). Although they are lying and saying this is to prevent any visitors giving her an infection, in fact it is so she does not infect others because TB is VERY EASILY SPREAD by simply coughing, laughing, etc. In fact she may have already infected hundreds, possibly thousands, of people. (The hospital has refrained from disclosing what the chest infection is though, in order to treat it, they must have identified it). She came in contact with thousands of people during the election campaigns in Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh. The public and those who were near her have a right to know and be alerted to seek testing and treatment. If she is infected with multi-drug-resistant TB, the consequences are even more horrible. A coverup is not just irresponsible, it is a capital crime amounting to mass murder, unnecessarily sending countless people to death.
Any one known to have come in close proximity to her, before she was hospitalised, after she became infected will have to be quarantined. This includes Manmohan Singh, all of the Congress Working Committee and many others who can be identified. Countless others cannot be identified and cannot be quarantined.
A continuation of the coverup will mean that those whom she infected will, in turn, continue to infect others including, for example, foreign leaders that Manmohan Singh and other members of the Cabinet may come in contact with.
As Manmohan Singh starts a visit to China, China's leaders and those of other countries run the risk of catching Tuberculosis from him or other members of the Indian government who came in contact with Sonia.
　
III. The following are my posts in an online discussion titled “Biological Warfare: Bird Flu in India Started by C.I.A.” :-
i) (January 28 ‘08) The bird flu in India has been started, beginning in West Bengal, by the C.I.A. so the United States can offer 'help' to India to fight it. This is in part in support of the nuclear deal, which is meant to strip India of its nuclear weapons capabilities, as a psy op to make Indian disposition toward the United States more positive. Today the U.S. ambassador asked India to hurry up with the nuclear deal and offered help to contain the bird flu.For over two decades, in press releases and letters and articles to the press, I have described how in the early years of the AIDS epidemic the United States was desperately looking for a population to use as guinea pigs for AIDS vaccine development, how the C.I.A. was given the task of roping in a population for this purpose, how the disclosures of kickbacks in the Bofors and HDW deals were made in quick succession to blackmail Rajiv Gandhi, who was then prime minister, into agreeing to have India's population used for this purpose, how after initial resistance from Rajiv Gandhi both Rajiv Gandhi and Vajpayee (who was then in the Opposition) agreed to having the tribal population in India's Northeast used for this purpose, how then India's Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) was given the task of spreading heroin addiction in the Northeast for this purpose and later the AIDS virus was introduced in other parts of India.As the prospects for the nuclear deal, meant to disarm India of its nuclear weapons, have grown bleak, the bird flu epidemic has been started by the C.I.A., through its Indian agents (see http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ for the role of the West Bengal chief minister, who is a C.I.A. agent, and others in both the nuclear deal and bringing India under military and economic subjugation to the United States).For the relationship between RAW and the C.I.A., see posting # 63 in the thread titled 'How DRDO failed India's military' on this board.
ii) (January 28 ‘08) At no point during their rule over India did the British have more than about 80,000 British people in India, women and children included. This tiny nation ruled India from half way around the world for centuries. With a thousand year history of slavery to various foreign invaders, it is not surprising that Indians are extremely stupid in defence matters, of which the comment by Indian Bull above is an example. It is my task to educate them. But traitors, of whom there are plenty in India, among "leaders" as well as others, cannot be educated, only shot.
I have said the Army should start working on plans to arrest and execute all RAW employees and politicians. And the first step is to arrest Manmohan Singh and his cabinet. They will be executed right after their arrest, so it does not matter if they are killed during the arrest.
ADDED FROM AUGUST 4, 2007 TO DECEMBER 6, 2007: Strategic Parity with the United States:
The root cause of the national suicide being committed through the nuclear deal is a failure of political parties to demand at least strategic parity with the United States-- see addendum dated July 25-26, 2007 below, objection number 2 to the nuclear deal and addendum dated July 20-23, 2007 where I say "parity with the United States requires at least ten thousand nuclear warheads" and "the missiles to deliver them to continental United States territory"-- as an objective and criterion. While the demand for a Constitutional amendment requiring Parliament's ratification of such agreements in the BJP's statement of August 4 '07 is a long-overdue step, a national objective of strategic parity, at a minimum, with all countries of the world, including the United States, is essential to guide such decisions. This is not something optional but essential; see addendum dated July 20-23, 2007 below saying "justice can only be delivered by your weapons" and showing "the supremacy of weapons in matters of justice" (this includes justice as between nations) and addendum dated July 31, 2005 below saying "The nonsense about 'minimal nuclear deterrence' is seen in the recolonisation of Pakistan, which has a 'minimal nuclear deterrent', by the United States". Just two days ago, a United States presidential candidate (Clinton) was "refusing to rule out the use of nuclear weapons against Osama bin Laden or other terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan" ( Washingtonpost.com, August 2 '07) and another U.S. presidential candidate (Obama) said he will undertake an "invasion" of Pakistan, which-- if Pakistan, which has nuclear weapons, defends itself-- will inevitably involve the use of nuclear weapons. India is constantly under the same threat, whether spoken or not, in all dealings with the United States. The BJP should look at its own statement dated December 27, 2005 on foreign policy at its National Executive Meeting which says Pakistan "strives for strategic parity" with India and, about "Indo-US relations", says "What must be at the core of our understanding is that 'strategic partnership' is ordinarily between two equals... accepting an asymmetrical relationship is not 'strategic partnership', it would be capitulation... Which is why the UPA's lack of understanding in dealing with the US is so worrying. With the UPA government's obsequious policies [and] a subservient relationship with the United States". The BJP must clearly understand that the "two equals" must, above all, be equal in nuclear weapons. In the letters below I have shown that India has the means to quickly and easily not just attain strategic (nuclear) parity with the United States but surpass it in economic prosperity and well-being. These objectives must be clearly stated in policy statements. Article 51 of the Constitution, which says "The State shall endeavour to--... (b) maintain just and honorable relations between nations;", must be amended to "The State shall endeavour to--... (b) maintain just and honorable relations between nations by attaining and maintaining strategic parity, at a minimum, with all nations of the world in its weapons and by assisting victims of imperialism acquire necessary weapons, including nuclear weapons;".
This Article (Article 51) of the Constitution, even as it exists now, provides a basis for Constitutional challenges, in court, to foreign policy acts that constitute "obsequious policies" toward and "subservient relationship" with the United States or that make India's foreign policy serve the United States' imperialist policies toward Iraq and Iran, etc. Recently the Supreme Court rejected a PIL seeking direction to the Central Government to seek Parliament's approval for the nuclear deal on the grounds that it would be interference in the government's treaty-making powers (a Constitutional amendment will be needed for that), but my PIL dated July 20, 2007 seeks "action against the Prime Minister, such as dismissal from office and prosecution for treason, for violating his oath of office to uphold the sovereignty of India by making joint statements, agreements and negotiations with the United States, in connection with said nuclear deal, that are highly injurious to such sovereignty ....", as indeed is clear even without the Hyde Act but particularly if, for example, the 123 agreement is read in conjunction with the Hyde Act. I have not heard anything from the Supreme Court regarding my PIL but if more such PILs are filed, seeking action against the Prime Minister on the grounds of violating his oath of office (which is in the Third Schedule of the Constitution) to uphold India's sovereignty, it will get the Supreme Court's attention-- and no Constitutional amendment is needed for PILs on these grounds.
You cannot uphold the country's sovereignty without the weapons to defend and uphold its sovereignty, which requires strategic (nuclear) parity with the United States. The nuclear deal, in all its aspects and processes-- joint statements, agreements, negotiations, etc.-- injures India's ability to attain strategic (nuclear) parity with the United States and, thus, injures India's ability to defend and uphold its sovereignty and, thus, injures India's sovereignty and constitutes failure to uphold India's sovereignty. This is so even if there were no Hyde Act, no 123 agreement, etc. or no deal is finally signed or executed.
Article 51 of the Constitution also requires India's government to endeavour to eliminate threats to just and honorable relations between nations and, since the United States is the principal transgressor of and threat to such relations between nations, endeavour to attain strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States and take measures, military and non-military, to eliminate this threat.
For other countries of the world, this means getting out of the United States-sponsored denial regimes such as the Nuclear Suppliers Group, International Atomic Energy Agency, etc. and helping each other acquire nuclear weapons to cope with this threat to just and honorable relations between nations.
It is illogical to demand an independent foreign or domestic policy or notsuccumbing to imperialists without demanding the weapons to defend thecountry's independence and sovereignty, because imperialists impose theirdictates by invasions and force of arms or threats-- implicit or explicit--of the force of arms. A Minister of Agriculture who has a single moment tospare for cricket while tens of thousands of farmers have been committingsuicide deserves the death penalty. But it is illogical to put the suicideof the entire nation below the suicide of a segment of its population as a BJPpress release dated August 3 '07 does which says it "will launch a massivefarmers' nationwide agitation ...on 20th August...More than 1 lakh...willhold a massive rally at Ramlila Maidan and will march to Parliament on thefirst day of agitation". India's agriculture policy, dictated by the United States, is meant to make India food-dependent on the United States, not just energy-dependent, defence-dependent, industrially dependent and dependent in all other areas and independence, ultimately, depends on your nuclear weapons. Such a rally and march of 1 lakh, or more, should be held the first working day of Parliament, or even on 20th August, against India's suicide through the nuclear deal.
When Manmohan Singh told the Left parties "to do whatever they want to do, if they want to withdraw support, so be it..." (The Telegraph, August 11, 2007), it was because he will remain in office even if he loses a vote in Parliament or Parliament passes a motion of no-confidence (addendum dated July 9-14, 2007, below, 3rd paragraph). The only master he has to obey is the United States.
The nation is faced with the gravest threat in its entire several thousand year old history. As I said in addendum dated August 2, 2005 below, "The India-U.S. nuclear proposal is such a threat that the armed forces ought to take matters in their own hands, remove this government and, if necessary, declare martial law". The political parties have yet to do anything that addresses the magnitude of the threat. There are many things they can do any one of which will effectively block the nuclear deal, as suggested in addendums dated August 4, 2005 and August 11, 2005 below, such as "passing a law.. ...prohibiting IAEA inspections of any facilities not already subject to such inspections or the import of nuclear technology and fuel except for a facility already receiving such fuel", or the import of nuclear technology or fuel under conditions specified in the law; the NDA, the Left and the UNPA together have the votes to pass such a law (a new law or a modification of the existing Atomic Energy Act). The Executive may not have to seek approval of Parliament for a treaty (unless the Constitution is amended) but it has to obey a law passed by Parliament enjoining the government not to proceed with the implementation of any agreement it has entered into (see addendum dated August 4, 2005 below)-- and no Constitutional amendment is needed for that. To repeat: the government may not have to submit an international agreement it has entered into for approval of Parliament but it has to obey a law passed by Parliament that either directly prohibits (unconditionally) the implementation of the agreement-- or its implementation in the presence of certain conditions, or its implementation in the absence of certain conditions- - or indirectly makes it impossible to implement the agreement, such as a law that simply prohibits IAEA inspections of any facilities not already subject to such inspections as of a certain date, such as January 1, 2006.
A PTI report, dated August 11 '07, from Ranchi [in The Hindu, August 11 '07, Internet] says "The Left's seriousness and sincerity in its opposition to the Indo-US civil nuclear deal will be seen when the issue comes up in Parliament, BJP MP Murli Manohar Joshi said today... "If the people send us to power again, we will find out ways to come out of it (the deal). We don't want to be dependent on other countries in matters like nuclear power"...". In addendums dated August 4 '05 and August 11 '05 below and in the paragraph above I have shown how the parties opposed to the deal can block it, or, if it has already been signed, block its implementation, render it null and void and effectively come out of it without waiting to come back to power (by which time the damage would have been done).
Parliament can also prohibit the negotiation (not just implementation) of any agreement or treaty at any stage of the process. The Executive is not required to submit any agreement or treaty for ratification by Parliament. But that does not restrict Parliament's power to prohibit the negotiation, completion or implementation of an agreement proactively, retroactively or while the negotiations or implementation are going on, at any stage of the process. Even if there were a provision for Parliament's ratification of agreements or treaties with other countries or the Executive on its own seeks approval of an agreement by Parliament without being required to do so, Parliament can cancel or retract its approval at a later date.
The India-U.S. nuclear deal was only initialed in Washington by the officials who did the negotiating and the draft was approved by the Cabinet; it was going to be signed either during the India visit of the United States Secretary of State or when Manmohan Singh met Bush. The lack of a requirement for the Executive to seek ratification of agreements by Parliament does not fetter Parliament's power to intervene, on its own, at any stage of the process in any manner it sees fit. This is so even if Manmohan Singh, for example, claims that he secretly signed it when he met a U.S. official in Manila recently.
Parliament's power is not limited to intervening in agreements or treaties initiated by the Executive; it can direct the Executive to seek an agreement or treaty of a certain kind with a certain country or group of countries. When it intervenes in the negotiation or implementation of an agreement or treaty that was initiated by the Executive on its own, its power is not merely prohibitory; it can direct the Executive to seek or incorporate specified features in the agreement or treaty.
India's Parliament can pass a one-sentence private member's bill saying "To safeguard India's sovereignty, no nuclear reactors in India that were not under International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards on January 1, 2006 shall be put under IAEA safeguards of any kind unless India has attained and maintains strategic parity, at a minimum, with all nations of the world in the number of nuclear warheads and their modes of delivery". Such a bill can be passed by a simple majority.
Any negotiations Vajpayee's government had for a nuclear deal with the United States occurred because of a letter of mine to the press referring to the possibility of a "counter-proliferation" nuclear strike by the United States on India as, for example, an American strategic expert with the Heritage Foundation was recommending. The negotiations were started in an attempt to forestall such a strike on India. There were better ways of dealing with the threat and not to insist on at least strategic nuclear parity with the United States is to perpetuate India's vulnerability to such a strike and all the consequences such vulnerability has for domestic and foreign policies. (Such a strike will occur without warning and without regard to any 'understandings' or formal agreements between countries; there is a negligible chance that there will be a forewarning of such a strike).
There were press reports of United States navy helicopters flying over and monitoring India's nuclear facilities in Kalpakkam after the events of September 11, 2001 and India's former negotiator at the Geneva disarmament talks said she believed that India's nuclear program was in a "rollback" mode due to the American threat. It is not known to what extent India's nuclear program was rolled back or curtailed by the Vajpayee government under the American threat. Kalam had announced a program of strategic missile defence ( defence against intercontinental nuclear missiles) in almost the same words that Reagan used to announce his 'Star Wars' program. Kalam later resigned and the program apparently abandoned and India is to accept participation in a United States missile defence program which will not protect India from a strike by United states' nuclear missiles.
After my reference, above, to Manmohan Singh secretly signing the nuclear agreement with a U.S. official, Mulayam Singh Yadav said "the UPA-led government had not yet made the real agreement public... What has been made public is not the real agreement" (The Asian Age, August 13, 2007). The nation has the right to know the real agreement as well as any rollback of India's nuclear program by the Vajpayee government under American threats.
Strategic nuclear parity with the United States will prevent a nuclear strike on India but it will not end the threat because, by its nature, the United states will be constantly striving for strategic nuclear supremacy. The only permanent solution is for India to attain strategic nuclear supremacy and eliminate this threat, as Article 51 of the Constitution also requires. With four times the manpower and five times the engineering manpower production compared to the United States, India can do it; it only requires a clear recognition of the necessity to do it. A national objective of strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States will be a motivator like nothing else can; it will transform India's psychology and produce economic prosperity also as nothing else can, with an application of my proposal about money, utilising the unlimited amount of capital at the government's disposal. A national objective of strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States will make crystal clear what India must do in all areas of domestic and foreign policy and put an end to present day policies and problems which have their roots in a slave mentality. All this is already implicit in Article 51 of the Constitution; making it explicit with the amendment of Article 51 suggested above should be the first order of business.
The Soviet Union did not suffer from a slave mentality and had strategic nuclear parity with the United States but was brought down by high level bribery and by bringing large sections of the KGB on the C.I.A.'s payroll so that Russian presidents from Gorbachev onwards have been selected by the C.I.A., with public support for them generated by control, through Russian intelligence agencies, of the media. Russian presidents and other officials now display a slave mentality in relation to the United States and their domestic and foreign policies are consistent with such slave mentality. India's RAW similarly functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India and most Indian prime ministers have been on the C.I.A.'s payroll. Despite their talk of relations between "two equals" (above), BJP leaders refuse to go beyond Pakistan and China when they talk about nuclear weapons and never refer to missiles capable of reaching the United States, much less strategic nuclear parity with or supremacy over the United States. Like Russia's presidents, or Manmohan Singh, they enjoy the support of the C.I.A. and participate in the C.I.A.'s crimes against India. By demanding an explicitly stated policy objective of strategic nuclear parity with, or supremacy over, the United States, political parties and others can counteract the treachery of their own or other parties' leaders and limit the ability of C.I.A.-controlled leaders to subvert such national objectives.
There is nothing to prevent the BJP from demanding, now, strategic nuclear parity with, or supremacy over, the United States as a national objective, if it is sincere in what it says, or explain why it does not demand such an explicitly stated national objective. Other political parties have the same burden.
According to a report (IANS, N. Delhi, August 20 '07) "A team of India's Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) is currently in Vienna to negotiate with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to put in place the prerequisites for India to commence its plans to harness civilian nuclear energy". This traitor government is rushing the IAEA agreement through while the political parties dither and quietly wait (Wait for what? The government has already responded to their warning by rushing the IAEA agreement through) just as it kept the 123 agreement secret for weeks while the political parties quietly waited without demanding why was it taking so long to photocopy a 30-page document and then claimed a fait accompli by saying the Cabinet has already passed it, etc. This traitor government has already gone ahead with 'finalising' the IAEA agreement; the time to bring a no-confidence motion is TODAY, not two days from now. The idea behind rushing the IAEA agreement, as the C.I.A. has instructed it to do, is that even if this government falls, any future government will be bound by it, as a non-UPA MP on the C.I.A.'s payroll has already said. In fact, a new government can repudiate the IAEA agreement by saying that some irregularity-- which could range from treason on the part of an official of the previous government to some technical flaw-- occurred in the process leading to the agreement. This brings up the point that any government of India, supposedly a nuclear power, behaves like a mouse. An agreement is only as good as your (military) power and willingness to enforce it. The United States flouts international agreements, ranging from the United Nations Charter (when invading or threatening to invade other countries, for example) to the earlier 123 agreement with India, with impunity and at will. The denial regimes, such as the Nuclear Suppliers Group which is the reason for India not being able to import Uranium freely and thus the reason for the whole nuclear deal, are nothing but an expression of American power as are unanimous UN Security Council resolutions in which Arab countries endorse United States invasions of other Arab countries, for example. I said in a letter below that if India HAS to get Uranium from outside India for any reason (though, in fact, it does not), it should plan on a military takeover of Australia rather than enslaving itself to the United States through this deal. But India's governments dare not utter a word about nuclear armed missiles capable of reaching the United States, much less a military takeover of Australia.
The inability to read the Constitution on the part of legislators, columnists and others exists not just regarding the powers of India's President (addendum of July 9-14, 2007, below) but also about the powers of India's Parliament. Article 253 of the Constitution says "Parliament has power to make any law for the whole or any part of the territory of India for implementing any treaty, agreement or convention with any other country or countries or any decision made at any international conference, association or other body". This article gives Parliament blanket powers to intervene in "any treaty, agreement or convention with any other country or countries or any decision made at any international conference, association or other body". A bill under this Article (Article 253) can be brought by any member of Parliament. This Article expressly provides a basis for Parliament's intervention of various kinds, described in several paragraphs above of the present addendum, in "any treaty, agreement or convention" the Executive has entered into or any "decision" it has made at "any international conference, association or other body" (this includes bilateral meetings of the kind India has held with the United States regarding the nuclear deal, for example). Other kinds of interventions described in some of the paragraphs above are part of Parliament's general power to make laws. The Executive does not have to SEEK (meaning, at its own initiative) Parliament's approval for international treaties, agreements or decisions and, if Parliament does not intervene, under Article 253 or as part of its general law-making powers, they can be implemented by the Executive without any reference to Parliament but that does not restrict Parliament's power to INTERVENE (on its own initiative, such as by passing a private member's bill) in international treaties, agreements, decisions, etc. The word "implementing" in Article 253 gives Parliament the power to impose any number of conditions of any kind in implementing any international treaty, agreement or decision, such as delaying its implementation for a decade or a century or until India has attained and maintains strategic nuclear parity, at a minimum, with all countries of the world-- to take an example pertinent to the nuclear deal. It also enables Parliament to REQUIRE Parliament's approval at every stage of implementation of a particular treaty, agreement or decision; the Executive has freedom to implement international treaties, agreements or decisions only so long as Parliament does not intervene, under Article 253 or under its general law-making powers. Parliament may not impeach a President for a century but that does not mean it does not have the power to do so. Parliament may not have intervened in an international treaty, agreement or decision so far but that does not mean it does not have the power. It has such power even if there were no Article 253, as part of its general law-making powers. The Executive's power to enter into or implement international treaties and agreements without any reference to Parliament is no different from its power to do a lot of other things, domestically and internationally, without reference to Parliament; for example the Prime Minister does not need Parliament's approval to undertake a trip to a foreign country, but if Parliament chooses to intervene, it can pass a law prohibiting the Prime Minister from visiting certain countries, or visiting them without its prior approval, for example. Like all bills passed by Parliament, such bills, after being passed by Parliament, have to go to the President for signature before they become law. To repeat: the Constitution does not EXEMPT entering into or implementing international treaties and agreements from Parliament's law-making powers; quite to the contrary. All activities of the Executive are subject to Parliament's law-making powers unless there is a specific exemption for an activity and there is no such exemption in the Constitution for entering into or implementing international treaties and agreements.
In an interview in Indian Express (August 22 '07, Internet), Pranab Mukherjee says: "We have initialed, not signed it. We have initialed separate texts of the 123 agreement." So there is more than one text of the 123 agreement? Where is the other text (this is presumably the "real agreement" that Mulayam Singh Yadav said has not been made public) or texts?
"US non-proliferation team on its way: ... to take forward what was started with the Next Steps in Strategic Partnership (NSSP) initiative taken by the NDA regime and then put together under the nuclear deal, both sides will discuss the progress India has made in harmonising its export control guidelines with those of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)" (Indian Express, New Delhi, August 24 '07, page 4). Denial regimes such as NSG (which is the 'cause' of India entering the slave deal known as the nuclear deal) and MTCR are nothing but instruments of United States imperialism as, indeed, is the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) whose inspections, etc., provide the basis for U.S. invasions and India should have nothing to do with any of them (a spurious distinction between "formal" and "informal" negotiations with the IAEA, meant to fool people, described in a report dated August 24 '07 in the Times of India, Internet, is beside the point). The political parties should also demand what is being done for attaining strategic nuclear parity with and supremacy over the United States, both in the number of nuclear warheads and missiles capable of reaching the continental United States territory. The lack of such parity, or supremacy, is the key to India's slavery and, if you are silent on this, you are a collaborator in India's slavery to American imperialism. A demand for strategic nuclear parity with and supremacy over the United States is the key to blocking the nuclear deal and all the other prongs of the march into slavery to the United States and, beyond it, eliminating the threat from this psychopathic serial killer, as well as the key to rapid economic prosperity for India of a kind unprecedented in human history. Rapid economic prosperity for India will also hinder the purchase of Indian politicians, journalists( the last paragraph of a column by K. P. Nayar in The Telegraph of August 22 '07 describes the routine planting of entire 'campaigns' in Indian newspapers by the U.S. embassy in support of U.S.-dictated policies; an article by Pranab Dhal Samanta in Indian Express of August 24 '07, page 11, misleadingly comparing India's nuclear deal with China's is an example of such readymade campaigns supplied by the C.I.A. through the U.S. embassy or through RAW), etc. In the letters regarding SEZs below I have shown how China's leaders have been bought up to supply slave labour for the U.S. consumer. India can do much, much better and have its land and workers work for Indians, not Americans or Japanese (who mostly work for Americans) as the Delhi- Mumbai industrial corridor will have them do. As I said in the letter dated February 11, 2004 below, China had adopted my proposal about money, with its unlimited capital, following my letter of January 5, 2004 below. But as soon as I mentioned this fact, they dropped it. An aspect of American imperialism over India is the careful avoidance by the Indian press, politicians and others of any mention of India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian even when, for example, what he said, above, about Article 253 of the Constitution and the truth about Parliament's power over international treaties and agreements forces the Speakers of both houses of Parliament, all its members, the press, the government and everyone else to junk their outrageously ignorant assertions about Parliament's impotence regarding international agreements while all these outrageously ignorant and enslaved people wait for a verdict on the fate of the nuclear deal from the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence and they continue to collaborate in other ways in the United States' crimes against India.
How did this slavery to the white man come about? An answer is in The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh): "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:..." India is faced with an even deeper slavery to the Americans with the nuclear deal and all the other prongs it comes with. Attaining strategic nuclear parity, then supremacy and using this supremacy to eliminate this incomparably greater threat, will be India's real War of Independence. One does not need to refer to the holocaust beginning 1857 to know the incomparably greater American threat and its consequences, which I know directly but which remains a secret from the Indian people.
There is a simple way to bring India out of its slavery and identify collaborators in India's slavery to American imperialism. Start with India's Army Chief and ask "Are you in favour of strategic nuclear parity with, or supremacy over, the United States as a national objective?" If the answer is not 'Yes', he should be shot on the spot. The same for all other generals and admirals, etc. The same for Manmohan Singh and members of his Cabinet. The same for leaders of political parties. The same for journalists writing on the nuclear deal. The same for 'strategic analysts', etc.
Not just uranium mining in India is being suppressed by agitations incited by C.I.A.-RAW, as I have said in letters below, to impose the slavery of the nuclear deal, also being suppressed are:
i) finds of "uranium in 'exceptionally high concentration' in Ladakh" with "uranium content as high as 5.36 percent compared to around 0.1 percent or less in ores present elsewhere in the country" (IANS, Bangalore, August 26, 2007);
ii) uranium available from "countries like Namibia, Niger, Uzbekistan, Nigeria, Uganda and Angola, which are outside the NSG" (The Asian Age, August 26, 2007, page 2); India "was getting yellow cake (uranium) from certain non-NSG (Nuclear Suppliers Group) countries in the past and there was no reason why India cannot take that route again". Before he was bought up and started his full-fledged participation in the fraud that is the nuclear deal, Kakodkar also had said India can have bilateral arrangements with any country outside the NSG.
As I have been saying in letters to the press for many years, almost all terrorist incidents in India-- including the latest in Hyderabad-- are carried out by the C.I.A. either through groups sponsored and controlled by RAW (RAW's sponsorship and control of the LTTE and several other groups in Sri Lanka, for example, was openly acknowledged, including by the Commission that inquired into Rajiv Gandhi's assassination, but the same is the case for numerous groups in India and other countries; at least 90% of RAW's activities are within India, against India) and intelligence agencies of other countries or groups it directly controls, in support of bringing India into the United States' 'war against terrorism' and into schemes such as the Container Security Initiative that form prongs of American imperialism (the recent American warning that India faces terrorist attacks from the sea on its nuclear installations were in preparation for planned American-sponsored attacks if the nuclear deal does not go through) or, in the case of the latest bombings, to 'neutralise' the opposition to India's planned military exercises with the United States.
A national objective of strategic nuclear parity with, then supremacy over, the United States will overcome all such frauds and stratagems and identify traitors to be shot on the spot as part of India's War of Independence (paragraphs above).
The Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister says "The state is facing unprecedented financial crisis and the economy is limping with acute shortage of funds" and "we are not going to tolerate it and the BSP will lead a campaign to unseat the UPA government at the Centre" (Times of India, August 27 '07, Internet). Whatever demands for funds her state or any other state makes are far too modest. As I have shown in the letters below, the Central government has an unlimited amount of funds by simply printing the money, so long as it is used for productive purposes. Her state and all other states should immediately increase their demands for funds at least tenfold and insist on an immediate application of my proposal about money by the Central government. To keep India down, economically as well as militarily, the C.I.A. spends more per year on suppressing and 'neutralising' India's greatest scientist than on all of its other activities in India-- which run into hundreds of millions of dollars at a minimum. The BJP has responded to the reference to "planned American-sponsored attacks if the nuclear deal does not go through" in the paragraphs above by capitulating to the United States, as it earlier capitulated to the threat of a "counter-proliferation" nuclear strike by rolling back India's nuclear program and Advani now says "his party has no objection to the 123 Agreement if the government amends the Indian Atomic Energy Act to ensure strategic independence and non-hindrance in reactor fuel supplies" (Indian Express, August 27 '07, Internet), even though India can get uranium from non-NSG countries-- though even that is unnecessary-- and no nuclear deal with the United States is necessary at all. Since I had mentioned modifying India's Atomic Energy Act or passing a new law to block the nuclear deal, above, RAW-- which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India-- immediately came out with a story in the Times of India (which is RAW's principal mouthpiece) of August 27 '07 ascribing to Yechury (who, as I have said, is on the C.I.A.'s payroll and intimately involved in the C.I.A.'s day-to-day activities in India) the idea (stealing my ideas and ascribing them to others is one of the ways C.I.A.-RAW have been suppressing India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian for the past 30 years; ascribing it to one of the "outrageously ignorant and enslaved people" I referred to above is even more criminal) that "India should pass its own version of the Hyde Act that makes it illegal to move nuclear materials out of the country if it affected the operationalisation of its nuclear reactors" (I had suggested blocking the entire nuclear deal --which is essential-- by passing a law prohibiting IAEA inspections of any nuclear facilities that were not under such inspections on January 1, 2006), which is "promoted by some sections of the media" (India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian is a 'section of the media'???). Both Advani and Yechury and all the other politicians should be asked "Are you in favour of strategic nuclear parity with, or supremacy over, the United States as a national objective?" and shot on the spot if the answer is not 'Yes'. India's War of Independence depends on it.
It is astonishing that the Left has been meeting with government ministers but not the BJP about the nuclear deal. The threat from imperialism overrides all other threats and the present government is the immediate threat from the direction of imperialism. Now that politicians are finally talking about amending the Atomic Energy Act and/or passing law(s) to counter the nuclear deal, the Left, the BJP and UNPA should agree on passing a law prohibiting IAEA inspections of any facilities not subject to such inspections on January 1, 2006 (a one-sentence draft is provided above) and end the most immediate threat. The next step will be to adopt "strategic nuclear parity with, or supremacy over, all nations of the world" as a national objective (by, for example, expanding Article 51 of the Constitution as suggested above) and its adoption will automatically end the master- slave relationship that is the so-called "strategic partnership". Getting out of the colonial mode and getting on with India's War of Independence can, thus, be done in two steps instead of one (and it will end the necessity for politicians and others to be shot on the spot).
Besides Advani's turn-about on the nuclear deal following the threat of American attacks if the deal does not go through, here are some more similarly craven responses of Indian politicians:
The Congress party spokesman at the India-US Forum for Parliamentarians: "the deal is like a key to a lock. The door is full of possibilities."..."It will fulfil India's energy needs" (The Hindu, August 27 '07).
The BJP spokesman at the same meeting: "Indo-US amity was initiated by the NDA Government and if the Congress takes it forward we are sure to support it" (same report as above).
The BJP Deputy Leader in the Lok Sabha: "America is the superpower and the BJP wants India to have strategic relations with them. Communists do not want any alliance with the US but this position will only help China and Pakistan" (Indian Express, August 28 '07).
Their behavior as collaborators is at least partly due to the support from the C.I.A. they receive. All this illustrates why there is no more urgent task before India than to attain strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States and eliminate this threat. Adopting this as a national objective is first.
Unnamed BJP politicians in a PTI report (Times of India, August 28 '07, Internet) say that the party's middle class base will not support opposition to the nuclear deal. But the demand should be not AGAINST the nuclear deal but FOR nuclear supremacy for India over all nations of the world; the nuclear deal will automatically have to be abandoned. A demand for nuclear supremacy is a demand that everyone, of whatever class, will instantly understand and support. They also said its middle class base will not go for an "extreme anti-American position".For the United States, nuclear supremacy is and has been an unquestioned axiom of its foreign policy; if this and threats to bomb entire nations "back to the stone age"-- a frequently uttered part of both official and unofficial American foreign policy (a popular radio song around 1980 even said "if Uncle Sam gets mad, there will be an oil slick where Iran used to be")-- are not an extreme 'anti-world' position, why is a demand for nuclear supremacy for India 'anti-American'? It is anti-imperialist, at most. The pathetic quest for 'green cards' and jobs with MNCs and in call centers by India's 'middle class' -- actually, collaborator class-- is a consequence of the holocaust by the British killing ten million in ten years after 1857; a truly independent India-- which requires nuclear supremacy-- will provide them with a better economic future. The CPI (M) rallied thousands of people today in Madurai and other cities in Tamil Nadu AGAINST the nuclear deal and those arrested filled entire marriage halls. The BJP can rally hundreds of thousands, then millions FOR nuclear supremacy (if their C.I.A. handlers will allow BJP politicians to do so).
One would have expected a blizzard of legislative proposals -- bills -- from the BJP, the Left and the UNPA to block the nuclear deal -- some examples of which, such as one prohibiting IAEA inspections of any facilities not subject to such inspections on January 1, 2006, have been provided above -- but not a single such bill has been brought. Some consequences of not demanding strategic nuclear supremacy for India as a national objective are seen in the following examples. Several days ago, Pranab Mukherjee said any question of "operationalisation" of the nuclear deal will come only after a safeguards agreement with the IAEA has been signed, the NSG part of the deal has been done and the agreement has been approved by the U. S. Congress; now he is saying "The government will take into account [a] committee's findings while operationalising the nuclear deal", that is, while implementing the deal after all of the above steps are complete and the agreement is formally in force. Like the verbal deceptions by which the 123 agreement was being 'sold' in India, by attaching different meanings to the word "operationalising" (implementing the agreement after all steps -- IAEA agreement, NSG part, approval by U.S. Congress -- are complete and the agreement is formally in force, for the government and something else for the Left), everyone is happy and India's march to catastrophe continues. The ineptitude of lawyers bringing a PIL in Delhi High Court seeking direction to the government "to approach the President to refer the issue to the Supreme Court for its legal advice" as to its "effect on the country's sovereignty" is equally astonishing; the effect on the country's sovereignty is clear enough; why not file a PIL directly in the Supreme Court seeking prosecution of Manmohan Singh for treason for violating his oath of office to uphold India's sovereignty?
Having called the Left's bluff, giving them a 'take it or leave it' statement that does not concede a millimeter, knowing they will not abandon their position as hangers-on to the government, the government has 'neutralised' the Left politicians. As the thousands of people arrested in each of several cities of Tamil Nadu protesting the nuclear deal show, the demand for nuclear supremacy for India will bring the Left to power but such a demand will show their politicians to have been outrageously ignorant and enslaved. The BJP can similarly come to power by demanding strategic nuclear supremacy for India but the C.I.A. will threaten to expose Vajpayee's life-long treachery, neutralising him and the BJP. The first day of this session of Parliament, the Samajwadi Party properly refused to let Parliament function unless the nuclear deal was dropped. The UNPA can come to power by demanding nuclear supremacy for India. In the past, C.I.A.-RAW have coerced the SP leader by threatening prosecution for improper use of aircraft while Defence Minister and the AIADMK leader with a slew of court cases. But a demand for strategic nuclear supremacy for India will sweep away all such coercion.
The assault on India's nuclear program is the present day version of a foreign invasion. Military supremacy over an invader is not optional but essential for survival. Military supremacy today means nuclear supremacy. But "nuclear supremacy" or "strategic nuclear supremacy" for India is not even mentioned by Indian politicians, press, strategic experts, etc. Being ignorant and enslaved cannot be a permanent excuse. As I have said below, many Iraqi generals were bought up by Americans in the course of their 2003 invasion but it did not make it any less of an invasion and the invasion was expressly called an invasion on Iraq's nuclear program. The fact that many Indian politicians and others have been bought up does not make this any less of an invasion. This is a war for survival and for independence and requires the energy, speed, commitment and a full spectrum mobilisation appropriate to a war.
In a war, traitors have to be shot on the spot, even if they change their behavior when caught. When the Left was in a tussle with the government over economic policies, Vajpayee had indicated the BJP will support the government if the Left tries to bring it down (a press report perhaps three years ago said he had told the BJP it was not good to let the Left pressure the government over policies) and the same C.I.A. orders are in effect regarding the nuclear deal (Advani said in Lok Sabha a few days ago we don't want to bring down the government; we want them to stay in office and commit more "blunders"). The Left's sudden change to saying they just wanted the government to "allay our apprehensions" (the effects of the nuclear deal on India are mere apprehensions and not a certainty?) from threats of "serious consequences" occurred because of a sudden increase in the size of the bribes offered; they were holding out for bigger bribes and they know the BJP will not let the government fall.
Politicians are saying the Left's sudden switch from "serious consequences" to "allay our apprehensions" is meant to be a face-saver for the government which will not proceed with the nuclear deal and bigger bribes to the Left politicians are merely the bribery of contact (referred to in letters below). Everyone is going back to business as usual -- that is, no work; no legislation to block the nuclear deal and Parliament has taken a 4-day holiday, converting even Monday, which was not a scheduled holiday, into a holiday. Yashwant Sinha is ascribing (The Hindu, Sept. 1 '07, Internet) to Advani my suggestion to bring domestic legislation to block the nuclear deal -- thus announcing his participation in C.I.A.-RAW's crimes against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian (when Finance Minister, he had once made a statement in Parliament which, without crediting me, constituted an implementation of my proposal about money -- which the NDA government tried to steal as I have said in the letters dated February 26 '05 and April 8 '05 below -- and RAW, within minutes of my seeing the report, altered the press reports to obliterate this fact) -- and "we will examine it... If it works fine. If it does not work fine". Well, business as usual is NOT going to be allowed; strategic nuclear supremacy for India is not optional but essential and central to policies in other areas, including economic policies.
Advani was among all the other outrageously ignorant and enslaved people who had no awareness that Parliament's law-making powers apply to all activities of the Executive including activities involved in negotiating or implementing international agreements and to all states of affairs resulting from activities of the Executive, whether domestic or international and that Parliament has unlimited and unfettered powers to impose conditions on international agreements the Executive may negotiate, finalise or implement and unlimited and unfettered powers to intervene in any agreement at any stage of negotiation or implementation giving any direction to the Executive it sees fit (and, by the way, to discuss anything under the sun whenever it pleases, vote on it or not, give a direction-- whether binding or not--to the Executive or not, express an opinion or not), unfettered powers to require the Executive to negotiate an agreement that the Executive has not negotiated on its own initiative or to require the Executive to abrogate any agreement that the Executive has negotiated or finalised at its own initiative--until I repeatedly pointed that out above. The Executive has a second master in the Judiciary whose powers of mandamus apply to all activities of the Executive. A recent PIL in the Supreme Court, argued by a senior advocate who was reportedly a former Chief Justice of the High Court in Andhra Pradesh, made the fatal mistake of asking the Supreme Court to direct the Executive to seek Parliament's approval for the nuclear deal; Parliament can intervene on its own and scrutinise any international agreement and give directions to the Executive regarding it; the PIL, rather than seeking direction to the Executive to submit the nuclear deal to Parliament for scrutiny should have sought scrutiny of the deal -- or of any document related to the deal or of any aspect of the deal -- by the Supreme Court itself, on grounds such as its violation of India's sovereignty or harm to India's economic or military-strategic interests or national security, citing relevant articles of the Constitution or other laws which enable the invoking of those grounds and seeking direction to the Executive to cease and desist, for example, or prosecute the Prime Minister for treason, to take another example, citing, for example, a violation of his oath of office, which is part of the Constitution, for seeking such direction. Thus the PIL should have cited a specific activity of the Executive or a product of its activity (such as the July 18, 2005 Joint Statement or the separation agreement entered into during Bush's India visit or the 123 agreement), alleged a specific violation of a provision of the Constitution or of some other law and sought a specific remedy from the Supreme Court itself. The fact that such outrageously ignorant, enslaved and inferior people are in 'power' in India -- ruled as, in fact, it is by the C.I.A. through RAW and through politicians directly on its payroll -- is simply a consequence of C.I.A.-RAW's crimes against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian and Advani and all the rest of these outrageously ignorant, enslaved and inferior people are the beneficiaries of these crimes and participants in these crimes. All these traitors will have to be shot for their crimes along with a few thousand of the top employees of RAW.
"Advani on Sunday urged the ...(UPA) government to bring in legislation to counter the provisions of the United States Hyde Act and protect the country's autonomy" (The Hindu, September 3 '07). How many times do I have to say that ANY member can bring in such a bill (does he not know that)? Is it not logical and necessary for opponents of the nuclear deal to bring such legislation instead of asking the government to do so? The BJP, the Left and the UNPA together have the votes to pass such legislation even if the government opposes it, which it will. Unlike a Constitutional amendment (he similarly asked the government to bring in a Constitutional amendment to make approval by Parliament a routine requirement for international agreements; in fact any member of Parliament can bring a Constitutional amendment; why doesn't he bring it?) such legislation can pass with a simple majority. This is not merely stupid, it is criminally stupid. In the same report, he says he is not opposing the nuclear deal "due to anti-Americanism, which was relevant only during the Cold war". This piece of dog-faeces should be asked why a country (the United States) that is trying to impose slavery on India is not India's enemy. The answer is that he is a collaborator with India's enemy, is a beneficiary of the United States' crimes against India and participates in those crimes.
I have said in the letters below that even if foreign nuclear technology were offered to India on a platter, with no strings attached and free of charge, it will be like poison and should be shunned like poison, because it eliminates or reduces the opportunities, investment and efforts for indigenous development of the technologies. The most precious thing and the source of real strength in the nuclear area, or any other area, is the skills and capabilities you develop through indigenous research and development. Like the example I have given of spending two and a half billion dollars on an Israeli medium range air-defence missile 'because the indigenous Akash program has not delivered on time' -- without spending even a tenth of that amount on the Akash program -- over ten billion dollars are to be spent on importing 126 fighter planes 'because the indigenous LCA program has not delivered on time' -- though nowhere near this amount has been spent on the LCA program. Even in countries with many generations of experience and technological capabilities in developing jet engines, the development of a new jet engine costs several billion, perhaps four billion, dollars. It would have been far better to invest $10 billion (or more, because whereas foreign manufacturers have many generations of investment and experience to draw upon and technological support from the rest of their industrial base available, India has to develop many more technologies that have not yet been developed indigenously) on indigenous research and development and production. For developing all-around technological capabilities in the country and the finances and manpower for that, see my letter of January 5 '04 below. "As finance minister during 1991-95, Manmohan Singh drastically slashed funding to the nuclear power programme, disabling new projects and halting uranium exploration. But as prime minister, Singh has become such a fervent advocate of importing high-priced reactors for electricity that he has brought his own political future under a cloud" (Times of India, August 30, 2007, Internet). As a column in The Telegraph a few months ago showed, Manmohan Singh was the C.I.A.'s appointee as finance minister in P. V. Narasimha Rao's cabinet. He was trying to kill off or restrict India's nuclear capabilities then on the C.I.A.'s orders and he is trying to do so on a much bigger scale now, on the C.I.A.'s orders. Despite Manmohan Singh's financial strangulation of India's nuclear program, it has survived and flourished and India's technological capabilities in the nuclear power field are more advanced than those of the United States in important ways. Even if the nuclear deal is stopped, a death penalty for Manmohan Singh is a must. The Supreme Court can enable that though India's traditional courts are more capable in important ways. A village panchayat in Haryana had annulled the endogamous marriage (marriage within the same gotra) of a couple, ordered them to live separately and taken their 6-day old baby to be cared for by others in the community. The harmful effects of endogamy on the genetic stock of a community and in producing genetic defects and reduced intelligence, etc., in members of the community are well established in modern genetic science (the disappearance of entire nations and civilisations has been ascribed to endogamy) and endogamy has been shunned, in varying degrees, all over the world throughout history. But thanks to India's ignorant, West-enslaved media, which called the panchayat a "kangaroo court" (The Statesman) and vilified it and to 'social activists', etc., after resisting such pressures and after an order to the Haryana Chief Minister from the "Congress High Command" (meaning the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence and illegitimately flying in the Air force's special jets), "the "inferior Indian niggers" of the police and the judiciary ... aping their foreign masters and doing all they can to injure India" (letter dated November 24 '04 below) are out to arrest members of the panchayat for their service to the community and to India. The nuclear deal is India's suicide through West-enslaved people and so is this.
"Every second Punjabi now has a phone", mostly mobile phones (IANS, Chandigarh, September 4 '07). "Over 55 percent of handsets sold in Chandigarh and Punjab are the high-end ones -- those costing Rs. 10,000 and above. Stores in Chandigarh and Ludhiana showcase and sell mobile handsets that start at a whopping Rs. 2.5 million apiece... A mobile buff in Ludhiana recently bought a VIP mobile number in an open auction for Rs. 55 million . Another banker in Jalandhar has over 86 VIP mobile numbers and wants to take the list to 100 such numbers". Will the people of Punjab go for strategic nuclear supremacy as a national objective? Absolutely. Other areas of the country cannot be far behind. C.I.A. employees Manmohan Singh -- continuing a beggar stance for India shunning "false pride" -- and Vajpayee can be executed and thrown on a dung-heap. Other countries of the lesser breeds have a lot of money and mobile phones (Iraq was pretty prosperous, too) but no nuclear supremacy and remain vulnerable to a fate such as Iraq's. Without strategic nuclear supremacy as an explicitly stated national objective, no amount of money or mobile phone density will bring India out of its slavery. This requires removal of C.I.A.'s control over the politicians and the government (exercised through RAW) and over the media (exercised through RAW). The people will go for strategic nuclear supremacy for India as a national objective -- not a luxury but an absolute necessity -- but this objective has to be brought before them. RAW, through the media and the politicians, forms a stonewall between the people and this objective. Much greater, much faster and universal prosperity for India and real, not borrowed, technological strength with independence, not dependence, through indigenous research and development is possible through my proposal about money but C.I.A.-RAW remain the stonewall between the people and this objective, too. RAW is the instrument by which the C.I.A. controls India. The C.I.A. will not easily give up this control. Eliminating this control and RAW and demolishing this stonewall is the task before the nation.
Both the BJP and the Left show they have gross misconceptions and naivete about the government's behavior in the nuclear deal because of which they are letting slip the only opportunity they have to block the nuclear deal -- passing a private member's bill by a simple majority that prohibits IAEA inspections of any facilities that were not under such inspections on January 1 '06, for example and this opportunity will be gone once the Monsoon session ends -- and are pursuing ineffective measures because of their naivete about what the government's behavior is going to be and what the stakes are for the C.I.A., whose dictates Manmohan Singh is following, because of which no precedents -- such as "we will force govt. to set up JPC on nuke deal ... recalled that joint parliamentary committees were finally set up on the Bofors deal and the security scam after initial refusal by then government" (The Hindu, Sept. 6 '07, Internet) -- apply and, even more naively, “Karat felt Parliament should discuss the nuclear issue... [that] will be the best way to make sure that this deal is not proceeded with ... [how] can a government go against a majority in Parliament” (The Hindu, Sept. 6 '07, Internet), as if the government does not know a majority in Parliament is against it or does not know the implications of the Hyde Act, etc., on which the Left plans to 'educate' the government and as if discussions, either in Parliament or in the UPA-Left committee will make any difference to what the government will do, which is hustle the deal through regardless of all this. Getting the nuclear deal through is such a high stakes matter for the United States and the C.I.A. -- and Manmohan Singh will give his life for the Americans and the C.I.A. as will Vajpayee who is probably the one misleading the BJP politicians , telling them they can "force the govt." to appoint the JPC, etc. -- that none of these will work. The only way to block the deal is to pass a private member's bill such as that suggested above which will effectively block the nuclear deal (as is shown in the one-sentence draft provided above, there need not be any reference to the nuclear deal at all in such a bill). Another example of such a private member's bill is " To safeguard India's sovereignty and self-reliance, there shall be no construction of imported nuclear reactors in India beyond the imported reactors in operation or under construction in India on January 1, 2007". The watchword is to block the deal by means that do NOT require any cooperation or concurrence of the government. Passing one of the private member's bills suggested here (though both can also be passed) can be done by a simple majority of the NDA, Left and UNPA and does not require any cooperation or concurrence of the government. Also, by a simple majority vote, the Monsoon session can be extended, if necessary, till such a bill is passed. None of the examples given here refer to the nuclear deal but will, in effect, make it impossible to implement or proceed with the nuclear deal, forcing its abandonment.
Like the prosecution of the Bofors case in which the government, while making a show of pursuing the case, was sabotaging and scuttling the case, the political parties opposing the nuclear deal are failing to take the simple and easy steps -- suggested in the paragraph above and before that -- that will effectively block the nuclear deal, confirming what I said many months ago that Pranab Mukherjee's confidence that 'despite some political flak' the deal will get through was based on knowing that the BJP and the Left politicians also will obey their American bribe-givers. Even more fundamental is their failure to even mention -- much less demand -- strategic nuclear supremacy for India, showing their commitment to continued slavery to the United States and the white man. The politicians and the media are the stonewall between the people and the twin objectives -- nuclear supremacy and rapid prosperity through my proposal about money -- that the C.I.A. has erected and maintains through RAW, as I said two paragraphs ago. Of these two objectives, nuclear supremacy is the more fundamental one; a demand for strategic nuclear supremacy will clear the way for everything else, including rapid economic prosperity, besides automatically requiring ejection of the nuclear deal. A demand for strategic nuclear supremacy is also essential for overcoming the subjugation imposed on Indians by the holocaust committed by the British, killing ten million in ten years following 1857 -- the killings undoubtedly continued in the years following the first decade after 1857 -- which is responsible for the subjugation to the white man the politicians, the media and others display. In the present age, the white man's ability to kill and subjugate is incomparably greater than that of the British in 1857 and this threat further deepens the subjugation and the slavery. By demanding strategic nuclear supremacy, Indians can overcome this subjugation and then eliminate this threat. There can be no more important item on the nation's agenda. In fact, this should be India's one-point agenda; everything else will follow as so many corollaries. A single-minded pursuit of strategic nuclear supremacy will revitalise the nation as nothing else can and inaugurate a new chapter in the nation's and the world's history.
It bears repeating that the nuclear deal is being IMPOSED on India -- the control of politicians and others by bribery, etc., is also a part of the imposition though the ultimate threat of military action is its foundation -- and this imposition is a manifestation of India's state of subjugation to the white man which has other aspects -- such as sending 80,000 postgraduate students to the United States every year, making no serious effort to educate them in India, putting half a million engineers and others on the payroll, directly or indirectly, of the United States every year, so they join the millions other Indians, military and non-military, on British payrolls willing to give their lives for their British masters and now are willing to give their lives for their American masters -- and an opposition to the nuclear deal has to be founded on an opposition to subjugation to the white man, which requires demanding strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States. Without demanding nuclear supremacy over the United States, you are leaving India open to the nuclear deal and other things being IMPOSED on a subjugated India, subjugated by killing uncounted millions in the past and the subjugation maintained by the threat of killing even more in the future. Weapons are the foundation of sovereignty. Adopting strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States as a national objective -- which is the operative part of sovereignty, rejecting subjugation to the white man -- will automatically make the nuclear deal untenable and unthinkable. Without adopting nuclear supremacy over the United States as a national objective, the nuclear deal also will continue to be IMPOSED on India by various methods. Adopting strategic nuclear supremacy as a national objective will not only ward off the nuclear deal and free India from subjugation to the white man but will also open the floodgates to prosperity and achievement in every sphere that a billion-plus people are capable of. Unlike the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, India's nuclear supremacy will be directed at eliminating the threat, because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy. The threat must die for India to live. A single-minded pursuit of strategic nuclear supremacy is required for this.
Are political parties saying they cannot communicate to the masses the necessity of military supremacy over India's number one enemy which is trying to impose total slavery on India?
India's Army Chief urged the boys of a military school in Pune today to "contribute their mite to make India a superpower in near future" (PTI in The Hindu, Sept. 12). Well, India is not going to be a military superpower in the near future if the nuclear deal is not dropped. He can do his bit by making a public statement, by himself or with the other service chiefs, urging that, in the interests of making India a military superpower in the near future, the nuclear deal be dropped immediately and unconditionally; or telling Manmohan Singh he will be removed from office immediately unless the nuclear deal is immediately dropped; or removing Manmohan Singh and his Cabinet from office immediately; or removing Manmohan Singh and his Cabinet from office and arresting all employees of RAW working in RAW headquarters.
Headlines: "Sethusamudram: BJP, VHP hold protests" (NDTV.com); "VHP workers launch a nationwide protest against govt's decision to go ahead with Sethu Samudram project" (Indian Express); "Activists block railway tracks in Patna to protest against the proposed demolition of Ram Setu" (Hindustan Times); "VHP calls off protest against Ram Setu in Delhi: commuters had tough time reaching their destinations due to road blockade at various places in the Capital" (Times of India). Ram Setu was built to let Ram's armies cross over to Lanka and eliminate that threat. I have said below (addendum of July 25-26, 2007) that the nuclear deal is like stripping Ram of his bow and arrows, tying him up and then raping Sita before his eyes. Ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States will be the present day equivalent of Ram Setu which the nuclear deal will prevent from being built. Has the BJP held any nationwide protests against the nuclear deal? Or are these protests meant to divert attention from the sabotage of the present day Ram Setu, as the demand for a JPC in Parliament was meant to divert attention from passing a private member's bill, such as those suggested above, that would have blocked the nuclear deal?
Along with the politicians and the media of a country that it controls -- such as India or Russia -- the C.I.A. always makes sure to put its top generals, etc., on its payroll (directly or through its local proxy such as India's RAW). After the paragraph above about how India's Army Chief can contribute his bit to making India a superpower in the near future as he urged the boys at the military school to do, RAW put out a PTI report of him saying how " "peace and tranquility" prevailed on India's borders with her neighbours", etc., so there is no need for India to become a superpower. Also, after the same paragraph suggesting the Army Chief remove Manmohan Singh and his Cabinet from office, RAW put out a PTI report about CPI(M)'s Karat writing to Manmohan Singh to "Help notify tribal bill ... request you to urgently intervene on this issue so as to ensure that an important achievement of the UPA government is not weakened or even subverted by the non-notification of the Act", to show why Manmohan Singh need not be removed from office, as the CPI(M) supposedly can. After my suggestion of a mass movement against the nuclear deal (addendum of July 25-26, 2007), Vajpayee first created a diversion with a BJP press release dated August 3 '07 saying it "will launch a massive farmers' nationwide agitation" and, when I pointed out that the suicide of the nation as a whole cannot be put below the suicide of a segment of its population, he scaled down the farmers' agitation and resorted to diversion in Parliament -- such as the JPC demand -- to preempt any effective measures -- such as a private member's bill I suggested -- to block the nuclear deal. Now he has launched the Ram Setu agitation to divert attention from any agitation against the nuclear deal. With the country's politicians, generals and principal intelligence agency -- RAW -- on the C.I.A.'s payroll and the media controlled through RAW, what is left to save India?
As Einstein's Theory of Relativity and the 'Twin Paradox' illustrate (the reference to Einstein is for all you West-enslaved people), Time is not a simple, linear affair and this bears upon the existence and historicity of both Incarnations -- such as Ram -- and their deeds -- such as the Ram Setu -- which the Archaeological Survey of India disputes in its affidavit to the Supreme Court but which occur in age after age ("sambhavami yuge yuge"). Saving the Ram Setu should not be difficult but a thousand times more attention should be paid by present-day India to building the present-day Ram Setu -- ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States -- with the same single-minded effort with which the earlier Ram Setu was built.
This is a warning to the piece of dog-faeces Advani and others: to be solely concerned with a Ram Setu from the past, with little functional utility in the present, while neglecting the construction of a Ram Setu for the present is suicidal and worse. It is like worshipping images of an Incarnation from the past and participating in crimes against one in the present. He and others must show their devotion by attending to the prescribed task at hand, which needs to be done in the present, not by ritual worship of the debris from tasks completed long ago. The task at hand, a Ram Setu for the present, is to construct ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States.
Ram Rajya was a dictatorship. All these outrageously ignorant, enslaved and inferior people (see paragraphs above; also the paragraph above about the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence and illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India) that are in 'power' in C.I.A.-ruled India are in 'power' because of the United States' crimes against India and against the present day Incarnation. Satellite photographs and aerial photographs of the Ram Setu show it to be a uniformly thin line and a neat and elegant passageway, of the length that it is, that would not have been produced by natural processes. Muslim tradition, which does not depend on the Ramayan or Ram, calls it a deliberately constructed bridge -- "Adam's Bridge". India does not need the Sethusamudram channel, which the United States wants for its own aggressive purposes, to enable a surprise attack on India's nuclear installations -- those who say they have no objection to the Sethusamudram Project if the alignment is changed to save the Ram Setu are playing the United States' game -- just as India does not need the nuclear deal which the United States wants for the purpose of totally and permanently subjugating India. "Eight Israeli F-15 bombers entered Syrian airspace in the early hours of September 6 ... and attacked a [nuclear] research establishment on the Euphrates river in Northern Syria, destroying it completely" (The Guardian, September 17 '07, Internet; the subjugation of the lesser breeds has progressed to the point that Syria dares not even complain about the attack and countries of the world, including India, routinely repeat the chant that the lesser breeds have no right to the use of nuclear technology for weapons-- which is reserved for the master races -- only for electricity, thus giving the master races the power of life and death over the lesser breeds which are now relegated permanently to the deepest slavery). Attacks like this on India's nuclear installations is one of the options the United States is pursuing (through the Sethusamudram Project, etc.) besides the nuclear deal, counter-proliferation nuclear strikes, etc. In 1996-97, in a letter to the press, I pointed to the danger from proposed United States military base(s) in Sri Lanka which prompted India's External Affairs Ministry, roused from its slumber, to frantically, energetically and categorically oppose and rule them out. India has acquiesced in U.S. bases now, not just in Sri Lanka but even in India but they must be immediately and energetically opposed, ejected and ruled out. The same for any U.S. presence in Nepal, Pakistan, Afghanistan and elsewhere. Until recently, a U.S. military base on Diego Garcia -- thousands of miles away from India -- was unacceptable to India; it should be equally unacceptable now; the same for the Persian Gulf region. As I have said, almost all terrorist acts in India are sponsored by the C.I.A. through groups it either controls directly or through intelligence agencies in the region including India's RAW and the Kargil war was staged by the C.I.A. with the help of RAW and Pakistan's C.I.A.-controlled Army Chief, to make Vajpayee win the election impending then. The United States' economic enslavement and suppression of India -- which ultimately depends on its military enslavement -- is even more multifaceted. The problem will not be eliminated without constructing a Ram Setu for the present -- ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States -- which must be built without delay with the same single-minded effort with which the earlier Ram Setu was built. Anyone in public life who is silent about nuclear supremacy for India is for nuclear supremacy for India's number one enemy -- the United States -- and deserves to be and will be shot as a traitor.
It is not too late for the political parties to pull back from the brink of disaster, to which they have been led by the C.I.A.-inspired lawsuit by Subramanian Swamy in the Supreme Court setting the stage for the C.I.A.-inspired provocative affidavit in the case, by:
i) the BJP, etc., focusing on building a Ram Setu for the present -- ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States -- and showing its devotion by attending to the task prescribed by the present day Incarnation rather than from the past;
ii) the advocates of the Sethusamudram project realising that it will enable surprise attacks on India's nuclear installations by the United States which wants the project for this reason;
iii) the Left by repairing the irrationality of demanding sovereignty without demanding the weapons which are the foundation of sovereignty, by demanding nuclear supremacy for India over the United States;
iv) the Congress Party by refraining from damaging the country by acts such as cover up of the gang rape committed by its leader (the information on this on www.hinduunity.com has been removed; do a Google search for "Rahul Gandhi gang rape") and making him its General Secretary, etc.
Anyone in public life who is silent about nuclear supremacy for India is for nuclear supremacy for India's number one enemy -- the United States -- and deserves to be and will be shot as a traitor.
It should not be difficult for a political party, which wants development in its state, to identify at least twenty large new projects, requiring investment of at least a few lakh crores and demand that the Central government use the UNLIMITED amount of capital available to it (simply by printing the money, so long as the money is used for productive purposes, because the money so printed and invested increases the Gross Domestic Product by an amount equal to the amount of money invested IMMEDIATELY and by several times the amount of money invested over time; see my proposal about money in letters below, starting with the letter dated January 5 '04; as I have said in the letter dated February 26 '05 below and elsewhere, the Americans have been suppressing my proposal about money, because it is in the economic field what nuclear weapons are in the military field, while they promote inferior Indian niggers such as Subramanian Swamy and Manmohan Singh, both of them traitors on the C.I.A.'s payroll) to fund them, rather than allow the United States to make a surprise attack on India's nuclear installations from a Sethusamudram channel; this will induce other states to make similar demands and further money will be pumped into India's economy by the many, many fold expansion of India's nuclear and missile programs to build ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States -- a Ram Setu for the present.
Realising that he is nothing but a piece of dog-faeces and there is no advantage in disobeying the present day Incarnation, Advani has stopped talking about the Ram Setu from the past, though he is yet to speak about the Ram Setu for the present; the sooner all the other politicians come to this realisation, the better for the country and for them.
In a letter below I said that India's nuclear scientists that have been bought up will now sabotage India's indigenous nuclear program. Such sabotage has already started. As I said in an earlier letter below, one of the United States' objectives is to get Indian scientists to switch to designing 'proliferation resistant' nuclear reactors -- that is, reactors from which it will be difficult to get material for making weapons. In his speech to the IAEA in Vienna recently, Kakodkar said India is "actively pursuing the design and development of Advanced Heavy Water Reactor which will mainly use thorium [and] would meet ... proliferation resistance goals" (Indian Express, September 21 '07, Internet). This is grievous sabotage of India's nuclear program. The number of traitors -- thousands of RAW employees, politicians, media people, etc. -- that will have to be executed -- they include all those in public life who are silent about nuclear supremacy for India and, therefore, are for nuclear supremacy for India's number one enemy, the United States -- is so large that a practical way would be to line them up along trenches and machine gun them. Locations of such trenches could be along Raj Path in New Delhi and elsewhere.
When the United States sent its warships into the Palk Straits recently, in the area where it wants the Sethusamudram channel, it was in service of its plans to deny, by military occupation, India access to India's thorium deposits in case it cannot get India to switch to 'proliferation-resistant' reactors, etc. The International Atomic Energy Agency is a principal instrument of American imperialism used to provide grounds for invasions and occupation of other countries and calling its head an "honoured guest" of India is like Iraq's puppet government calling American occupation forces honoured guests of Iraq. Time is of the essence in acquiring nuclear supremacy for India and for removing, by machine guns and bulldozers, all those who stand in the way of India's nuclear supremacy.
An abandonment of the nuclear deal (the prospect of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches has changed the mind of UPA politicians who were otherwise quite ready for mid-term polls which are being cited as the reason for the change) must not divert attention from the most urgent pursuit of nuclear supremacy for India which remains a critical requirement and must be India's one-point agenda until nuclear supremacy is acquired and the threat from the United States is eliminated. While the nuclear deal was the United States' 'peaceful' option for imposing the deepest slavery on India, other options, including a surprise 'counter-proliferation' nuclear strike on India, will get priority as the nuclear deal is abandoned. The task before India remains building ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States and doing this in the shortest possible time with a single-minded effort that must determine policy in all other areas. Politicians -- who are nothing but pieces of dog-faeces -- cannot accomplish this task; they will continue to be obstacles in the way of nuclear supremacy for India and must still be machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches along with thousands of RAW employees, media people, etc.
While giving up his insistence on the nuclear deal, Manmohan Singh says he will continue in office for the remaining one and a half years of his term. Evidently he has not fully absorbed what is said in the paragraph above or he will not plan to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy for another year and a half.
Manmohan Singh's patron and master, Bush, whom he called from Nigeria, cannot save him from being machine gunned and bulldozed into a trench nor enable this piece of filth to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy for another year and a half.
Nor will his resignation save him. Manmohan Singh and his cabinet and thousands of RAW employees will be the first to be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches, followed by all those in public life who are silent about nuclear supremacy for India and, therefore, are for nuclear supremacy for India's number one enemy, the United States.
Immediately, unambiguously and irreversibly killing the nuclear deal is essential but that will not save Manmohan Singh or those who want to replace him as obstructors of India's nuclear supremacy by talking of renegotiating the deal or anything less than nuclear supremacy for India which must go forward at full speed, without delay. None of them can be allowed in office but giving up office or the quest for office will not save them from being machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches and nothing will save the thousands of employees of RAW which manages them (the plan now is to renegotiate the deal with the support of the BJP) for the C.I.A.
The refusal by pieces of filth such as Advani to recognise the United States as India's number one enemy is sustained by thousands of C.I.A.-RAW-inspired headlines in India's media such as "Indian-American becomes Governor of Louisiana" which should instead say "Indian rewarded for conversion to Christianity with governorship: As reward for conversion to Christianity at age 18, as Americans themselves admit and his numerous published essays and articles on his conversion, Indian made Secretary of Louisiana's Health and Hospitals at age 24, President of the University of Louisiana system at age 27, then Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services in Bush Administration, then member of U.S. Congress and now youngest Governor in U.S. at age 36" ( http://cenlamar.wordpress.com/about-cenlamar/lamediawatch/bobby-jindal-the-story-they-dont-want-you-to-read ). Even more important are the thousands of headlines that are missing from India's media, thanks to C.I.A.-RAW, the story they really don't want anyone to know, saying "India's greatest scientist and greatest living Indian publicly tortured in Harvard seminar, systematically and totally starved for up to 3 weeks at a time, made semi-starved and homeless and even blind for years, kept under 24-hour audio and video surveillance as well as surveillance of communications and electrical typewriter and computer use, document creation and photocopying, etc., by satellite for more than past 3 decades, systematically harassed and in poverty and neutralised and robbed of his work at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars per year, robbed of crores in his money and property in India by C.I.A.-RAW, forced back into exile in the U.S., all with full cooperation and participation of India's RAW and India's C.I.A.-RAW-controlled prime ministers, politicians and media -- to keep India poor, weak and enslaved: The most intelligent, most handsome man on Earth, a living Incarnation, plans nuclear supremacy for India in near future, to destroy India's number one enemy, the United States, with ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles and will machine gun and bulldoze into trenches all traitors who stand in the way."
Indira and Rajiv Gandhi, both agents of the C.I.A. in its crimes against India, met a well-deserved fate. The white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India, was reportedly seen talking to her son, when she wanted to be private in public, in "a language that was not English", presumably in Italian; she has taught him Italian in case she has to flee India and move to Italy; she should move to Italy NOW, with her son and leave India to Indians. Vajpayee, another agent of the C.I.A. which even staged the Kargil war to make him win an election, has removed himself from public life but that will not save him from being machine gunned and bulldozed into a trench along with Manmohan Singh and many others. India's nuclear supremacy will move forward at full speed, without delay.
There is a basic difference between the treason of Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee and that of Manmohan Singh. The holocaust after 1857 in which the British killed ten million Indians in the first decade to terrorize and subdue them was in large part committed with the help of Sikhs. This terrorization and subduing continued right up to the end of direct British rule, exemplified by the Sikh soldier, riding in a jeep with the British viceroy, cutting down with his submachine gun any Indian, man woman or child, that came in view on either side of the road. The role of the Sikhs, who were originally founded to save India from foreign invaders -- the invaders were then Muslims -- reversed from 1857 on and they became a principal instrument of the British terrorization and subjugation of India. The Sikhs know how successful this terrorization and subjugation was -- it is this terrorization and subjugation because of which Indians today dare not even mention nuclear supremacy for India much less demand it -- and their role in it determines their attitude toward whites and toward Indians. This is why Manmohan Singh considers himself answerable to no one except Bush and the white man as he imposes the terrorization and subjugation of the nuclear deal on India, makes no attempt to hide his loyalty to the white man and shows open contempt for Indians.
The struggle against the nuclear deal is a continuation of the 1857 War of Independence and it must end in nuclear supremacy for India and destruction of India's present day imperialist enemy -- the United States. Like Manmohan Singh and others praising British rule over India (he did that when receiving an honorary doctorate from Cambridge University; he was prime minister of India at the time), there are many Indians who praise American rule over India. Like the many Indians loyal to Queen Victoria, there are many Indians loyal to the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India. All these Indians must be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches (a simple test is to ask "Are you for nuclear supremacy for India?"). India's nuclear supremacy must be and will be established. Only then will the War of Independence be won.
In an American response to the above two paragraphs (other responses are American officials such as the Treasury Secretary aggressively telling India, in the manner of the East India Company, to totally open up its economy to American investment -- that is, American ownership of India -- and making it "very clear" that India must have no dealings with Iran) a column in the New York Times of October 26 '07 calls Indians doing outsourced work the white man's "external cognitive servants". But Indians are also being turned into the white man's military servants, just as they were under the British, in Mesopotamia in World War I -- as Iraq was called then -- and elsewhere (as I mentioned in a letter below, Manmohan Singh was celebrating millions of Indians serving as Britain's military servants, fighting whoever and wherever the British wanted them to, in WW I and II), as they participate in military exercises such as Yudh Abhyas held in Alaska last month which "was conducted in an 'Iraq-like' environment with Indian and US troops staging a mock attack on an 'Iraqi village' controlled by an insurgent [this is the imperialists' name for Iraqi patriots fighting foreign invaders] group and simulating roadside bombings and suicide attacks" (IANS, N. Delhi, October 26 '07). The white man's Indian servants, whether cognitive or military, prefer to serve white masters rather than India because of higher pay and the advantages of serving the more powerful and the power factor supersedes and encompasses within it the higher pay factor. Indians will not stop being traitors and serving India's imperialist enemies and start serving India unless India acquires nuclear supremacy which is necessary for overcoming the terrorization and subjugation imposed on them by the holocaust perpetrated by the British (the Americans, who have already killed millions out of Iraq's 24 million population, are trying to similarly terrorize and subjugate the Iraqis and, instead of fighting a common enemy with the Iraqis, the white man's Indian servants, already terrorized and subjugated, are preparing to serve the imperialists further). Nuclear supremacy -- which will automatically entail destruction of the imperialist enemy because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy -- must be India's one-point agenda and all those who stand in the way of nuclear supremacy, including the likes of Vajpayee and Advani not just Manmohan Singh, his cabinet and thousands of RAW employees, must be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches.
In war, officers are under orders to execute on the spot any soldiers who are too terrorized to fight or obey orders to advance on enemy positions. This keeps the remaining troops battle-worthy and able to fight. The terrorization and subjugation Indians have undergone at the hands of the British is responsible for Indians refusing to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy over the United States. It is necessary to execute -- machine gun and bulldoze into trenches -- at least a few thousand such Indians, who are in key positions -- such as RAW employees, politicians and media people -- to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy (they may be terrorized or bought up or both though being bought up is greatly facilitated by being terrorized; the terror, when long standing, is usually repressed meaning unconscious and being subjugated often involves both terror and carrot but terror is the foundation of the treason of RAW employees and people such as Vajpayee and Mani Shankar Aiyar though all they may feel is love and loyalty for the white man; terror facilitates such love; a former head of RAW, Vikram Sood, in a column in Hindustan Times, repeatedly quoted the white/Christian head of the missionary school he attended as the fount of all wisdom on various issues and referred to Indians as worshippers of snakes and monkeys on a Times of India blog -- I have referred in a letter below to RAW arranging for practitioners of an Indian discipline, whose understanding of gravity and inertia I called superior to that of Albert Einstein, to be physically attacked and driven away in Noida and Madhya Pradesh on the C.I.A.'s orders -- but such behavior of RAW employees, the behavior of desi people like Laloo Yadav and even thoroughly devout and traditional Indians and of all Indians in everyone's household, neighbourhood and community is profoundly determined by the terrorization and subjugation the British inflicted on Indians and this terrorization and subjugation is responsible for the fact that no Indian dares to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy for India; Laloo Yadav recently said he held a lathi rally of farmers against American imperialism but he dares not demand anything effective -- lathis cannot defeat American imperialism -- such as ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States), for India's nuclear supremacy to go forward.
Even lathis can be useful if they are used to beat enslaved traitors such as Advani to a pulp who refuse to call the United States India's number one enemy and refuse to demand nuclear supremacy for India. Laloo Yadav will not do it but the RSS ought to do it if it is sincere in the pride it professes in India.
According to Russian news agencies, there are plans to sign an agreement, for Russia to build another four nuclear reactors in India (as I have said in the letters below, the Department of Atomic Energy had strenuously objected even when the agreement to import the two Russian reactors under construction now was made though Kakodkar is now lying and saying that importing Russian reactors was always in the plans), during Manmohan Singh's visit to Moscow this November 11-12 and "Russia would supply fuel for the units on condition of subsequent return of spent nuclear fuel". The spent fuel is what provides material for making weapons. Instead of buying Russian reactors, this and more money should be pumped into India's indigenous program to expand and accelerate it as fast as possible. For many years, in the 1990s and now, Manmohan Singh has been obstructing the mining and processing of uranium in India, forcing many projects to be abandoned, by starving India's indigenous program of funds. The indigenous projects must be revived and new ones started and, if necessary, more uranium can be obtained from countries that are not members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group, an option that this filthy criminal, Manmohan Singh, has also been obstructing. It does not matter whether he is beaten to death, machine gunned or run over by a tank, the sooner this criminal-traitor is executed, the better for the country.
In response to the above, Kakodkar has said that with the uranium available in India at present, eight more pressurised heavy water reactors of 700 MW each can be set up and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited can construct all of them simultaneously (The Hindu, November 3 '07, Internet). Instead of material for weapons being a byproduct of producing electricity, India's nuclear program should be designed and operated so that electricity is a byproduct of producing material for making weapons. Of the ten thousand nuclear warheads needed, five thousand should be neutron-type weapons and the rest other kinds of thermonuclear weapons. Neutron weapons that will be effective over the largest possible area per warhead should be designed and tested. DRDO should start work immediately on a crash program for the means of delivery of ten thousand nuclear warheads to the continental United States territory. The Army should start working on plans to arrest and execute all RAW employees and politicians who are obstructors of the above plans.
The political parties are mistaken if they think they can continue obstructing India's nuclear supremacy without being machine gunned into trenches along with all RAW employees. C.I.A.-RAW, through C.I.A. agent M.K. Narayanan, got a reluctant Kakodkar to go to the final round of 123 negotiations to Washington where he stayed in his hotel room and then lie and argue for the deal to the BJP. C.I.A.-RAW have repeated that now but, no matter how many times they get Kakodkar to lie and what the BJP and other political parties do, ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States are going forward at full speed and abandoning the nuclear deal will not stop the bulldozing of a few thousand dead traitors -- which the politicians are as much as RAW employees -- into trenches.
I wrote above that the way the nuclear deal can be blocked is by passing a private member's bill prohibiting IAEA inspections of any facilities not under IAEA inspections on January 1, 2006, or by passing a private member's bill prohibiting construction of any imported reactors not already in operation or under construction on January 1, 2007, or both such bills, but all these outrageously ignorant, enslaved and inferior people did not bring either of these bills. Now C.I.A.-RAW have engineered the violence in Nandigram through the state chief minister on the C.I.A.'s payroll, to neutralise the Left's opposition to the nuclear deal by threatening to dismiss the state government if they threaten to bring down the Central government if it proceeds with the nuclear deal. The politicians are worse than worthless pieces of dog-faeces; they are traitors and have to be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches; nothing short of India's nuclear supremacy will protect the country and this will go forward.
A couple dozen non-politicians have written an open letter in support of the nuclear deal. A simple way to identify traitors is to ask "Are you for nuclear supremacy for India over the United States?" and shoot on the spot all those whose answer is not 'Yes'. All these are enslaved people comfortable in an inferior relationship to the white man. Although the number of such people is very large -- in India such inferior Indian niggers are the rule rather than the exception -- only a few thousand of them in a position to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy need to be shot. These letter writers -- they include six former service chiefs -- are among those who should be shot along with all RAW employees and politicians.
Getting India's nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, whether or not India imports American reactors, has been a prime American goal because at least 75% of the damage to India's nuclear program would have been done once the facilities are placed under IAEA inspections, even if nothing further is done and no nuclear deal with the United States is finally signed and no foreign reactors, from the United States or from Russia or France, are bought. Any move to put Indian nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, beyond the ones under IAEA inspections at present, is a grave injury to the nation and an invasion of India like the American invasion of Iraq and deserves a response appropriate to an invasion. If the nuclear deal with the United States is abandoned but IAEA inspections are brought in on the pretext that they are needed to import reactors and fuel from Russia -- the strategy now is to get the IAEA inspections in place without completing the nuclear deal with the United States and buy Russian reactors instead of American ones, to begin with -- the import of Russian reactors instead of pumping the money into the indigenous nuclear program will be an additional injury. As I have said above, India's nuclear program should be designed and operated so that electricity is a byproduct of producing material for making weapons rather than material for making weapons being a byproduct of producing electricity. The criminal-traitor Manmohan Singh is still starving the Indian nuclear program of funds -- a tripling during the 11th Plan of a very low amount is still very low -- and still blocking the option of getting uranium from non-NSG countries, if necessary, though simply exploiting the uranium reserves in the country already known -- at present only 300 tons per year is mined though the known reserves are over 78,000 tons not counting the extremely rich deposits recently found in Ladakh -- is quite enough for India's needs. It is a lie to say that India's nuclear power production cannot be expanded beyond 10,000 MW on domestic uranium, though the production of electricity must be a byproduct of producing material for making weapons. A country that has ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States cannot be restricted from importing, without IAEA inspections, etc., however much uranium it wants from wherever it wants by the United States or any other power; the power of nuclear weapons is what India needs; electricity can be produced in numerous other ways for the time being. Breaking bread or shaking hands with this criminal-traitor or agreeing to talks on new inspections with the IAEA -- an instrument of American imperialism -- are acts of treason and deserve punishment as severe as this criminal-traitor's.
To give the Eurasian son of the white woman 'status' ahead of the AICC session, C.I.A.-RAW put out a story that three JeM terrorists who had been targeting him -- this was denied by the U.P. government -- have been arrested and have confessed. C.I.A.-RAW staged numerous terrorist attacks in support of Vajpayee, such as the one on the Parliament building which was used for a full scale year-long mobilization of troops on Pakistan's border, in addition to the Kargil war they staged to make him win an election, as I have said above and below. In a letter to the press in the late 90s, I suggested that the heads of the members of the Congress Working Committee be chopped off, along with that of Vajpayee and deposited in the AIDS woman's AIDS canal. After the 1998 nuclear tests, when the AEC chairman Chidambaram said no more tests were needed, I wrote in a letter to the press something like this: 'the obscene spectacle of the AIDS woman, protected by the Special Protection Group, spouting obscenities at India's greatest scientist and patriot languishing in exile -- even though Manmohan Singh, leading a Congress Party delegation, said to Vajpayee that some scientists (meaning the undersigned) have expressed reservations about the adequacy of the tests and the latter replied that the Government will go by the advice of the scientists in technical matters -- will be a thing of the past ...'. Well, it hasn't become a thing of the past and the AIDS woman has not taken up my suggestion above to move to Italy with her son. To my earlier suggestion, I would add the head of Advani also before a stick of dynamite is placed in there to blow them all up. They dive under the petticoats of a white woman for protection from the white man -- she is a beneficiary of the terrorization and subjugation inflicted by the British on Indians through the holocaust they perpetrated from 1857 on and a favourite mode immediately after 1857 was blowing them up from the mouths of cannons -- but only India's nuclear supremacy, with ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States, will protect India from the white man.
After my reference to the obscene spectacle of the AIDS woman, protected by the Special Protection Group, her security was drastically increased and they began to halt all traffic when she was due to pass on any road. But there is nothing they can do to prevent thousands of traitors, who obstruct India's nuclear supremacy, from being machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches along Rajpath and elsewhere.
As I have said, at least 75% of the damage to India's nuclear program will have been done if the new IAEA safeguards are brought in even if no deal with the United States is finalised and no reactors are bought from any country. The BJP's silence on the government proceeding to negotiate the IAEA agreement shows an utter lack of seriousness about defending India's nuclear interests, which are India's supreme national interest infinitely more important than Nandigram or Karnataka or anything else. The SP's and the AIADMK's silence is equally puzzling. At the beginning of the Monsoon session of Parliament, the SP's refrain was "Nuclear deal vapas lo! (Abandon the nuclear deal!)". This -- and specifically abandoning the IAEA negotiations -- should still be its sole refrain now and that of other political parties. What matters is not a debate but STOPPING, by whatever means, the IAEA safeguards. For that, the negotiations must be stopped.
Should the political parties fail to stop the IAEA negotiations/safeguards, the consequences for all the traitors, including the politicians, will be horrible (see paragraphs above).
C.I.A.-RAW have instigated the violence in Kolkata, as in Nandigram, in support of the nuclear deal, so that the Left remains under pressure -- under threat of dismissal of the state government -- to let the IAEA safeguards be concluded. Advani and the B.J.P. are playing C.I.A.-RAW's game. The sole option of the Left now is to bring a no-confidence motion immediately while Parliament is in session but the West Bengal chief minister on the C.I.A.'s payroll, who has been colluding with C.I.A.-RAW in the Nandigram violence, will oppose bringing a no-confidence motion.
In the United States Congress, amendments such as the private member's bill I suggested prohibiting IAEA inspections of any facilities not under such inspections on January 1, 2006, are often attached to totally unrelated bills; the BJP, the Left, SP and AIADMK, etc., have the votes to attach such an amendment to any totally unrelated government bill (since private members' bills have to brought in advance and are selected by lottery) but they do not have the intelligence. They are happy to let the country slide into the deepest slavery. This is why they have to be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches.
Besides the West Bengal chief minister, at least two other members of the CPI(M) Politburo -- Yechury and Jyoti Basu -- are on the C.I.A.'s payroll; Yechury is also intimately involved in the C.I.A.'s day-to-day activities in India and is in charge of misleading/managing the Left politicians for C.I.A.-RAW. CPI(M) can let the West Bengal MPs vote against a no-confidence motion or even cut them out from the party as a cancerous part -- after all, the communists have split into separate parties before -- and seek the support for the no-confidence motion from other parties such as the BSP -- which will stand to benefit from new polls -- but they will have to move fast.
The Navy's demand for "warships like US" and "to build the same tonnage warships on the pattern of US carriers" and "Urgent steps ... to drastically expand the capacity of existing shipyards" and "more shipyards" (PTI report in Times of India, November 25, 2007, Internet) is a good start and the Army and Air Force must make similar demands. Even more urgent is to stop the negotiations with the IAEA that will consign India to permanent inferiority and slavery to the United States and demand ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States. As I said in the letter dated August 2, 2005, below, the armed forces must take matters in their own hands to deal with the invasion of India that is in progress and put an end to this threat.
I said above the Army should start working on plans to arrest and execute all RAW employees and politicians. The first step is to arrest Manmohan Singh and his cabinet.
Satish Chandra
ADDED ON AUGUST 2, 2007: Belarus's historic opportunity:
Belarus can turn the crisis inflicted on it by C.I.A.-agent Putin into a historic opportunity. At the start of this year, Putin more than doubled the price of gas to Belarus and agreed that Belarus can pay the additional $456 million from the price increase for the first half of the year on July 23 '07. Belarus sought a loan from Russia to cover the price increase. Putin did not grant the loan, despite Russia and Belarus being part of a "union state", hoping to force Belarus to borrow from international agencies such as the World Bank and force Belarus under the economic and political control of the United States because, of all the former Soviet republics, Belarus has resisted such control. Now Putin is threatening to cut gas supply to Belarus by almost half from tomorrow unless this amount is paid. According to a report titled "Belarus at the brink of economic collapse", the Belarusian president in May "signed the bill on annulment of students' and pensioners' benefits" ( Charter97.org, July 31, 2007). What Belarus can do is 1) offer to pay the $456 million to Russia in Belarusian currency (remember, any government has an unlimited amount of capital at its disposal by simply printing the money-- see letters below-- so long as the money is spent/invested for productive purposes), which Russia will be obliged to spend on buying goods and services from Belarus or to invest in Belarus; 2) greatly increase investments into the Belarusian economy by simply printing the money while maintaining/restoring the social benefits that have been canceled. As I have shown below (for example, letter dated February 26, 2005 and the rest of the letter sequence before and after this date), a government can increase the GDP of the country by 25% or more per year by simply printing and spending such additional amounts for productive purposes. Belarus can make currency arrangements with other former Soviet republics, with a lot of unexploited natural resources and manpower, to invest Belarusian currency in those republics also to develop those natural resources. Belarus can by-pass C.I.A./Putin-ruled Russia and take the leadership to develop not just its own economy but those of other former Soviet republics and not just reverse the disastrous consequences of the C.I.A.'s subversion of the Soviet Union but inaugurate a new age of prosperity and well-being the like of which has not been witnessed in human history. (Russia will then be forced to emulate Belarus and beg forgiveness and the Belarusian president can become the president of a restored union of republics).
ADDED ON JULY 31, 2007: Being herded to the slaughter house in Russia and India:
The illusion under which Russia has submitted to the United States' plans for world domination is that Russia has nothing to fear from the United States which simply wants it to join an alliance of white countries against non-white countries. But the little girl the psychopathic serial killer (addendum dated June 22 '07 below) raped, tortured and killed and the killer himself were both white. The United States will not spare Russia because Russia is white. The United States' occupation troops remain in both Germany and Japan-- one white, the other not-- more than sixty years after the end of World War II. Russia was the only match for the United States and the only country able to destroy it. Even if Russia disarmed totally and unilaterally, it will not save it from the United States any more than the little girl would have been saved by agreeing to let the psychopathic serial killer rape her if he would spare her life. Enslaving and killing non-whites is a strong motive of the United States for which it seeks alliances with white countries but killing Russia is an even stronger motive because of its past and potential strength and-- beyond any such 'rational' motives-- simply because it is there, just as the psychopathic serial killer killed people, including the little girl, simply because they were there.
Russia's presidents on the C.I.A.'s payroll-- Gorbachev and Putin (Yeltsin is dead)-- have re-started herding Russians to the slaughter house. Russia has revived plans for many joint 'anti-terrorist' military exercises with NATO, of the kind that were canceled in 2006 and Lavrov told Putin on July 30 '07 that U.S. and Russia may reach a deal on missile defense, meaning Russia may acquiesce in the United States' stationing of its National Missile Defense elements in Poland and the Czech Republic with "an agreement that considers Russia's interests" (Xinhua).
ADDED ON JULY 25-26, 2007: The Rape of Sita:
Before his last visit to India, Russian President Putin had said Russia was prepared to offer India light water reactors "directly" without any of the conditions (a safeguards agreement with the IAEA, NSG approval, separation of civilian and military reactors and all the other conditions in the July 18 '05 India-U.S. joint statement, the Hyde Act, etc.) of the United States. Believe it or not, the Indian government rejected the Russian offer and said it has to go through the IAEA, Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), etc. for which it has to first conclude a nuclear deal with the United States! The purpose of the C.I.A.-sponsored nuclear deal is to bring India under the United States' boots and disembowel its nuclear program and that is why C.I.A. agent Manmohan Singh rejected the Russian offer. When the Russians offered the two light water reactors, now under construction in India, the Department of Atomic Energy had strongly opposed it (see addendum of August 20 '05), correctly saying that it will only benefit the Russian nuclear industry and light water reactors will break India's control over the nuclear fuel cycle and subvert India's 3-stage nuclear power program as well as its nuclear weapons program. But Vajpayee shoved it down India's throat on the instructions of the C.I.A. which calculated that there will be less resistance to such a disadvantageous deal with the Russians and once a couple of light water reactors have been brought in, it will set the stage for a full-scale American assault to subjugate and disembowel India's nuclear program.
Not all in the BJP share Vajpayee's treachery; Yashwant Sinha recently said the BJP will go to the people with the nuclear issue. Always too little, too late; I suggested starting a mass movement on the issue over a year ago; see addendum dated July 1 '06. I am sure Vajpayee vetoed it though it would also have brought the BJP back to power. Why doesn't Advani undertake a Rathayatra on the nuclear issue? The nuclear deal is like stripping Ram of his bow and arrows, tying him up and then raping Sita before his eyes. And it should do it NOW, without waiting for Parliament to assemble; August 10 is a long way off.
The objections to the nuclear deal can be arranged in a hierarchy:-
1) The first and a fundamental objection is spending untold billions of dollars on imported reactors instead of ploughing the money into India's own nuclear power program more advanced and more capable (thanks to its nuclear "isolation" and apartheid) than that of the United States in important ways. It can be expanded 10 or 20-fold so India becomes one of the world's biggest EXPORTERS, not an IMPORTER, of the world's best and most economical reactors with the shortest time for installation (all this is true of Indian reactors even at this moment). There is significant demand for Indian reactors from other countries though, stupidly, Indians say they will not export them unless they receive permission from the white master. This by itself is enough reason to summarily and totally reject the nuclear deal.
2) The second objection is that the imported reactors will be light water reactors. These will not only make India dependent in perpetuity on imported fuel and vulnerable to all kinds of pressures but, even if an unlimited amount of fuel was somehow magically guaranteed, it will fatally injure both India's 3-stage nuclear power program and its nuclear weapons program. This is so even if there was not an upper limit of 20% enrichment while reprocessing the waste fuel from the imported reactors. Light water reactors are inherently "proliferation-resistant" (that is, it is difficult to get bomb-grade material from them), though not "proliferation-proof". In any case, the 20% cap on enrichment (weapons and certain types of reactors require around 95% enrichment) cripples India's strategic (nuclear weapons) program-- because parity with the United States requires at least ten thousand nuclear warheads-- and ensures permanent slavery to the white man and permanent serfdom to India.
3) Then there are the various requirements in the July 18 '05 joint statement such as separation of civilian and military reactors, IAEA inspections on the civilian reactors including all imported ones, the necessity to get Nuclear Suppliers Group approvals, etc. which cripple India's nuclear program as a whole and bind it hand and foot to the United States.
4) Then there is the blizzard of demands and restrictions in the Hyde Act and previous U.S. legislation including the prohibition of testing (the latest 'concession' by the U.S. on testing simply says that, rather than a test resulting in automatic return of all imported U.S. equipment, the U.S. president may ALLOW India to conduct a test at his pleasure if India begs and convinces the White Master) that make India a total slave to the United States which, even under the documents, will be able to do any damn thing it wants to India in all its internal and external affairs-- a serfdom that is comprehensive and complete.
5) Then there is the United States' propensity and certainty of doing things to India-- once it has India dependent on U.S. reactors, fuel, permissions, etc.-- to arm-twist, blackmail and invade if the lesser breeds don't do everything it wants them to do-- the kind of things it has done and is doing to Iraq and will certainly do to India, including its complete nuclear disarmament, participation in U.S.-led military campaigns against other countries, the total colonisation of its economy and manpower to serve American needs, etc.
Indians on the C.I.A.'s payroll have been pushing this deal which should have been and was instantly and totally rejected. See addendum dated July 23 '05 below. The BJP/Vajpayee also came out with a written statement rejecting the deal within a couple days of the joint statement of July 18 '05 (before the Hyde Act, the 123 agreement, etc.).
In a mass movement, the BJP can emphasize that, with the nuclear deal, India's Independence (Azadi) is being taken away and its sword (nuclear weapons) is being snatched from it by white imperialist powers, which is the truth.
A consequence of the nuclear deal will be that Indian nuclear scientists in charge of reactor research (like a former head of such research, Placid Rodrigues, who was swayed with financial incentives, as I pointed out in the addendum of December 12 '06 to January 9 '07 below and now has been completely bought up) and those in charge of putting up nuclear power plants (such as head of the Nuclear Power Corporation of India, S. K. Jain, whose bought-up status has been obvious to me for a long time; he is also the one who said India will not export reactors without permission of the white master) will sabotage the research and development of India's Fast Breeder Reactors-- crucial to India's indigenous three-stage program-- with the active involvement of India's traitor prime minister and others (see addendum dated July 20-23 '07 for the bogus excuse for which the indigenous Akash program has been abandoned for a $2.5 billion Israeli program) and India's 3-stage indigenous program will simply be abandoned, citing manufactured technical problems, etc., once the nuclear deal is in place. CIA/RAW have continued to incite agitations against uranium mining in India (see addendum dated August 5 '06 below) and very soon India's nuclear power program will consist almost entirely of imported light water reactors using imported fuel.
One does not need the text of the 123 agreement to know that
i) the nuclear deal will create dependence on other countries (particularly a country like the United States virulently hostile to any nuclear programs in the hands of the lesser breeds) in a strategic area;
ii) it will drastically reduce the amount of fissile material available for weapons by virtue of the fact that such material will be unavailable from reactors that are placed in the 'civilian' category and because it is difficult to get weapons-grade material from light water reactors-- the kind of reactors that will be imported.
The very concept of the nuclear deal is outrageously injurious, without going into details, and should be summarily rejected.
Simply negotiating such an outrageously injurious deal for a prolonged period with a devastating and predetermined outcome in the manner in which it has been 'negotiated'-- actually, imposed-- demoralises scientists so they stop doing their job properly since the superior fruits of their labor are being flushed down the drain and American hegemony being established. Focusing on the fine print of the deal gives legitimacy to the concept of the deal which deserves rejection at a glance. The scientists then enter the colonial mode of thinking and being-- the mode in which the rest of India has always been but India's nuclear program was not. As I have said below, India's nuclear program is an island of superiority in the cesspool of inferiority that is India. Through this nuclear deal, that island is being eliminated and that is the United States' chief objective.
Regarding India's strategic program: the very definition of deterrence requires that your capabilities be public knowledge. How many nuclear warheads can India launch against the continental United States and with what delivery vehicles? If the answer is less than ten thousand, India should do absolutely nothing that will reduce the amount of fissile material available for weapons-making.
ADDENDUM DATED JULY 20-23, 2007: Reasons for Kalam's failure to act:
An important factor in Kalam's failing to act is my reference, in addendum dated June 21, 2007, below, to a press cartoonist in New Delhi having been tortured and brutally murdered for 'showing my influence'. This cartoonist was Muslim and had published a cartoon showing Sonia being thrown out of an airplane right after I suggested, in a letter to the press, that she be thrown out of an airplane (this was before she held any party or government post but was treated as the empress of India and all visiting heads of state were required to call on her where she lived in the prime ministerial residence). Right after the addendum of June 21 '07, Kalam was reported speaking about the importance of cartoons in newspapers. His failing to act is due to fear of what may happen to him if he 'showed my influence' (see also the reference to the assassinations of Indira and Rajiv Gandhi in the letter dated February 26, 2005, below). The Indian media's failure to report on my PIL to the Supreme Court seeking invalidation of the election for President held on July 19 '07, for reasons such as those stated in the third and fourth paragraphs of the addendum dated July 19-20 '07 below, including the decisive role of the C.I.A. and the India-U.S. nuclear deal in determining who could be the candidates in this election for President and seeking prosecution of the Prime Minister for treason and violation of his oath of office to uphold the sovereignty of India in the joint statements, agreements and negotiations in connection with the nuclear deal is also due to factors such as those referred to in the addendum dated June 21 '07 below.
The reasons boil down to the fact that India is still ruled by the white man (and woman). See addendum of August 11-22, 2006. But it is precisely to break the white man's rule that India's nuclear weapons and missile programs are important and why Kalam should exercise his power in defence of these programs and dismiss this government. Not to exercise this power is the same as the supreme commander not using the country's missiles in defence of the country.
This is also why non-white countries of the world should help North Korea preserve its nuclear weapons and missile programs against the United States' moves to eliminate them.
Kalam's responsibility to the country is greater than that of the judiciary because when the offender is a foreign aggressor-- the United States or the white man-- justice can only be delivered by your weapons, not your judiciary. In his statement "The only hope the nation cherishes and looks to is the judiciary" (addendum of July 9-14, 2007), he should substitute the word "President" for the word "judiciary". This is so both by virtue of the fact above-- weapons as the source of justice-- and by law. Just compare the grandness of the President's residence with that of the Chief Justice of India (or the Prime Minister's) to know their relative official status.
India's new president, if she is sworn-in, was the choice of one person-- the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence. This president would be imposed by the foreign aggressor-- the white man-- like the puppet president and government of Iraq (see letter dated January 5, 2004, below). But the Chief Justice of India has the right and the duty not to swear her in until the "doubts and disputes" arising out of her election are resolved (third and fourth paragraphs of addendum dated July 19-20, 2007, below). I have raised such doubts and disputes in my PIL to the Supreme Court on July 20, 2007 and the Chief Justice of India has the duty not to swear her in till those doubts and disputes are resolved. But even the judiciary does not do its duty unless the public and the press oblige it to-- that is why judicial proceedings are required to be public (the public does not know about the PIL unless the press lets it know) and these are under the foreign aggressor's control. Thus the judiciary is under the foreign aggressor's control. (This was more obvious with American 'advisers' , by virtue of successful invasion, telling Iraqi judges how to try and sentence its President, Saddam Hussein, showing the supremacy of weapons in matters of justice). By dismissing the puppet government of India, Kalam would be striking a blow for India's independence. (Iraq had an elected parliament under President Saddam Hussein as it does now but the present government is a puppet government and the previous government and President-- removed by the United States for its weapons development programs-- were not). Unless this government is dismissed, in the future India's weapons programs will be by "permission" of the United States, under rights "granted" by the United States, etc. Will the United States "allow" India to develop weapons that threaten the white man's rule over India, which requires at least parity with the United States in nuclear weapons and strategic missiles, etc.-- such as at least ten thousand nuclear warheads and the missiles to deliver them to continental United States territory? Even in the age of bolt-action rifles, a country that can only have arms "allowed" by another country is a vassal.
I.K. Gujral is reported as saying (The Asian Age, July 23, 2007) "The fact of the matter is that already 16 of our reactors are under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards. Cameras have been placed on them and they are being monitored all the time". What kind of safeguards are these? When did this happen? Only a couple of India's reactors were under safeguards till now; the 14 reactors India agreed to place in the civilian list under the separation of civilian and military reactors (agreeing to such separation was a highly injurious move as was the July, 2005 joint statement as a whole) were not supposed to go under safeguards and India was not supposed to even negotiate a safeguards agreement with the IAEA until AFTER the nuclear deal had been finally and formally concluded, though the United States, in violation of even the July 2005 joint statement, demanded later India conclude such an agreement with the IAEA beforehand.
Some Indian nuclear scientists have been bought up. M. R. Srinivasan is one of them. Kakodkar was repored to have vigorously opposed the nuclear deal when he accompanied Manmohan Singh to Washington in July, 2005, but the Indian ambassador was reported to have brought him round by saying the Prime Minister has to have a "successful" U.S. visit. He has had his arms twisted and, since he is still in the government, is highly vulnerable. Some inducements ( such as promises of high government posts, if not cash) may have been used to buy up scientists and at least one 'strategic expert' who has recently become an advocate of India becoming a satellite of the United States; almost all directors of the Institute of Strategic Studies and Analyses have been C.I.A. agents (K. Subrahmanyam is a decades-old C.I.A. agent intimately involved in the C.I.A.'s day-to-day activities in India).
As I have said, even if there were absolutely no conditions to the United States selling nuclear reactors to India, it will be extremely injurious to India. The money used for buying foreign reactors should instead be pumped into India's own nuclear power program. Recently, the Cabinet approved a $2.5 billion program for developing a medium-range air defence missile with Israel, only 20% of which will be spent on the Indian part of the project, because the indigenous Akash program has not produced a missile on time. Was even a tenth of this amount (a tenth of $2.5 billion is $250 million) spent on the Akash program? These are bogus excuses of traitors weakening and enslaving the country to the imperialist powers on whose payroll they are.
I have said the BJP has stopped Parliament from functioning for up to 2 weeks at a time on all kinds trivial issues. The nuclear deal is a life and death issue and if it is sincere in what it says about the nuclear deal, it should refuse to let Parliament function until the deal is abandoned (seeking 'explanations' from knowing traitors will not do) and any new safeguards sneakily placed on Indian reactors by these traitors are removed.
The focus has been on what various documents concerning the nuclear deal say. But the United States is not bound by documents or agreements in nuclear matters with countries it is determined to disarm as it is determined to disarm India (the nuclear part), no matter what it says now, unless it becomes a U.S. satellite thoroughly under its boots; it resorts to invasions when other means (such as arm-twisting and blackmail which it will progressively use once it has India dependent on its reactors, fuel, permissions, etc.) do not work.
ADDED ON JULY 19-20, 2007: Death Knell for India:
Kalam has failed utterly to do his duty to the country. He should at least have the decency to cancel the high tea he has planned for these traitors. So long as he is President--he has another four or five days-- he can still dismiss this Council of Ministers, appoint a new Prime Minister (he need not agonise over who to appoint; it could be almost anyone) and dissolve the Lok Sabha. This will give the country a new start, even if he himself is not in the Rashtrapati Bhavan and halt the catastrophe-- the death knell to the country-- that is the nuclear deal. This should be his top priority, not the high teas.
It was the C.I.A. which was opposed to Kalam remaining President because of which Vajpayee told Kalam he can't have a second term. As I have said, the nuclear deal is a C.I.A. operation that has been in the works for many years (see addendum of August 11-22, 2006, below). It was after I wrote "Kalam should have stepped in and stopped the deal, but he is too timid" (addendum dated June 12 '07, below) that Shivraj Patil, who had spoken about the danger of terrorist strikes from the sea on coastal nuclear power plants of the kind envisaged under the nuclear deal (which was his way of opposing the deal) and is aware of the C.I.A.'s sponsorship of most terrorist acts in India, was replaced with Pratibha Patil as the UPA's candidate for President.
The United National Progressive Alliance (UNPA) had directed its members to abstain from voting in the election of the President. The NDA had then filed a petition with the Election Commission saying that this direction by UNPA to its members was Unconstitutional. Although the Election Commission, in its verdict, agreed with the NDA's argument, its decision was reported in the press as being just the opposite of what it was; a banner headline on top of a PTI report on the Times of India homepage that I saw said the Election Commission had rejected the NDA's petition and similar headlines (saying, for example, 'Election Commission upholds the right to abstain') and stories by other news agencies, saying that the Election Commission had rejected the NDA's petition-- only an ANI report correctly said the Election Commission had agreed with the NDA's argument-- appeared on the web sites of other newspapers and news sources. One had to search long and hard to find a correct report on the Election Commission's verdict. This (1) gross confusion (I never saw any corrections by the Times of India or other news sources) about the Election Commission's verdict and (2) role of the C.I.A. described above in determining who would be the candidates in the election-- both candidates became candidates because of the C.I.A.'s intervention-- makes the election for President just held invalid and it should be so declared by the Election Commission. Under Article 71, Section 1 of the Constitution, "All doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice-President shall be inquired into and decided by the Supreme Court whose decision shall be final" and aggrieved individuals and parties can so move the Supreme Court but the Election Commission should declare the election invalid on its own.
That there was in fact "extreme confusion" about the meaning of the Election Commission's verdict in the minds of the voters and this confusion had a determining effect on their voting behavior is shown by the following report dated July 19, 2007 on the Indian Express homepage: "Blaming the Election Commission for the 'extreme confusion' generated by its note on July 17 on the issue of abstaining in the presidential polls, AIADMK Supremo Jayalalithaa on Thursday said her party MPs and MLAs discussed... the matter among themselves and came to the conclusion that they would have to face undesirable consequences if they did not cast their vote and so 'by way of abundant caution, they themselves decided to cast their votes in the presidential election'.... The EC suddenly came out with a press note on July 17, which 'created a lot of unnecessary confusion in the minds of all concerned', she said...Jayalalithaa said she was busily engaged in getting legal opinions and clarification from constitutional experts and senior lawyers till Wednesday afternoon... "I was advised that convening a meeting of my party MPs and MLAs would be misinterpreted and misconstrued by the EC as an attempt to influence and intimidate my party MPs and MLAs and therefore such a meeting should not be convened. I was also advised that I should not issue any kind of statement and that I should not give any instructions to AIADMK MPs and MLAs. Therefore I kept silence," she said... Her party MPs and MLAs had been accustomed to receiving clear directions and detailed instructions from her on all important occasions and issues, she said adding that since no direction or instruction were issued by her on the presidential polls, MPs and MLAs were thrown into confusion...The EC's note created unnecessary fear and panic in their minds. There was no one to explain the correct position to them since convening any meeting was forbidden and would be misinterpreted as issuance of a whip', she said...she said 'this turn of events has occurred only because of the extreme confusion generated by EC's unwarranted and unnecessary note issued in the late evening on July 17 and not due to any other reason'."
ADDED ON JULY 18, 2007: The fraud behind Putin's decree on the CFE:
A picture of Putin with Bush Jr. at Bush's father's house showed Putin with the expression of a lost boy reunited with his father. Another picture showed Bush Jr. with an appropriately dominant hand on Putin's shoulder. So as not to be fooled by Putin signing a decree suspending Russia's participation in the treaty on Conventional Forces in Europe right after he hosted Kissinger and a bunch of other Americans in his home (such visits by retired senior dignitaries, like retired Clinton's meeting with Vajpayee, usually bring bribes and assurances of continued C.I.A. support), Russians should know it was like the Communist chief minister of India's West Bengal state who, as I have said, is on the C.I.A.'s payroll, holding showy public quarrels with the United States ambassador and having his party members hold large, showy demonstrations against joint exercises by India's air force with that of the United States in his state without making any material difference to anything and insisting on his plans to let the Americans take over the industry, manpower and land of his state. These are some of the tricks traitors on the C.I.A.'s payroll use to keep their people fooled.
A Polish minister said that at the time of Poland joining NATO, there were threats similar to those made recently about the United States putting elements of its National Missile Defense there but nothing came of those threats. Nothing will come of threats made recently either; the Russian presidents on the C.I.A.'s payroll will ensure Russia's enslavement by the United States continues apace.
How can the Russians liberate their country? By not allowing any American-- the United States is a psychopathic serial killer (see addendum dated July 6 '07, below)-- civilian or military, to set foot on their soil. The same applies to all other countries but they need not do it all together; each country can do it individually.
ADDED ON JULY 9-14, 2007: Powers of India's President:
From a column in The Telegraph and another in The Asian Age on the powers of India's President, it is evident Indians are unaware (perhaps these columnists cannot read) of Article 75 Section 2 of the Constitution which simply says : "The Ministers shall hold office during the pleasure of the President". The term "Ministers" applies to all members of the Council of Ministers, including the Prime Minister. Neither the appointment of a Prime Minister (regarding the appointment of a Prime Minister, Article 75, Section 1 simply says "The Prime Minister shall be appointed by the President") nor dismissal requires any condition (such as a majority in Parliament or lack of it) other than the President's pleasure or lack of it. The Prime Minister a President appoints need not even be a member of Parliament at the time of the appointment. In fact, the interim Council of Ministers (addendum dated June 30, 2007, below) may consist simply of retired civil servants with experience in running various ministries, or academic experts in various fields, for example.
The President acts in accordance with the advice of the Council of Ministers while the Council of Ministers holds office but the Council of Ministers holds office only during the pleasure of the President.
There is not much time left for Kalam to withdraw his pleasure from this Council of Ministers holding office. Once a new (interim) Prime Minister has been sworn-in, the President will have the option of either dissolving the Lok Sabha and calling new elections or simply appointing a new Prime Minister of his choosing (and Council of Ministers) every six months because a Minister can remain a Minister for six months without being a member of Parliament (Article 75, Section 5). If a Prime Minister becomes a member of Parliament within six months of being appointed, he/she can continue in office even if he/she belongs to no political party and a lot of the legislation brought by the Council of Ministers fails to pass in Parliament (the Council of Ministers can get a lot of the nation's work done by means of Ordinances to be signed by the President who can similarly summon and prorogue Parliament); there is no Constitutional requirement that a President has to dismiss a Prime Minister if Parliament expresses a lack of confidence in the Prime Minister; the Prime Minister can continue in office as long as he/she has the President's pleasure. Conversely, a Prime Minister, even if supported by a majority in Parliament, cannot hold office after a President withdraws his pleasure.
Kalam has already informally expressed his lack of pleasure with the Council of Ministers by saying that "the only hope the nation cherishes and looks to is the judiciary" (IANS, July 9, 2007). It is time for him to do his Constitutional duty and sign a formal order withdrawing his pleasure from this Council of Ministers holding office (addendum dated June 30, 2007, below).
It needs to be emphasized that:
1) The President can dissolve the Lok Sabha at any time (Article 85, Section 2b) though, unlike the appointment and dismissal of a Prime Minister, this has to be done on the advice of the Council of Ministers;
2) If Kalam dissolves the Lok Sabha (on the advice of the new Council of Ministers after formally withdrawing his pleasure from the present Council of Ministers holding office and swearing-in a new Prime Minister of his choosing) before the scheduled date, July 19 '07, for the election of the President, the election of the President cannot be held until after a new Lok Sabha is elected and the members-to-be take the oath of office because the President is elected by the elected members of both Houses of Parliament (Article 54, Section a), in addition to the elected members of the Legislative Assemblies of the States. Also, "The President shall, notwithstanding the expiration of his term, continue to hold office until his successor enters upon his office" (Article 56, Section c). After the dissolution of the Lok Sabha and the convening of the new Lok Sabha, the process of the election of the President will have to be started all over again, beginning from the filing of new nominations, etc.
With the supreme interests of the nation at stake, these (the dismissal of the present Council of Ministers, the appointment of a new Prime Minister of his choosing and the dissolution of the Lok Sabha on the advice of the new Council of Ministers) are steps well worth taking.
The process requires these simple steps: Kalam signing a one-sentence order (such as that suggested in the addendum dated June 30 '07 below) dismissing the present Council of Ministers and appointing a new Prime Minister; Kalam swearing-in the new Prime Minister (until additional Ministers are sworn-in, the new Prime Minister will be the new Council of Ministers); the new Prime Minister giving Kalam a one-sentence request to dissolve the Lok Sabha; Kalam signing another one-sentence order dissolving the Lok Sabha. All this can be done in a single day-- in fact, in a matter of minutes. All that is needed is for Kalam to decide who should be the new Prime Minister out of the multitude of choices he has.
Traitors under CIA-control are fast bringing the country into slavery to the United States. Dismissing this government is not just 'worthwhile' but a requirement; not to do so will be the ultimate dereliction of duty and a betrayal fatal to the nation. Kalam should forget about serving 'high tea' to the Rashtrapati Bhavan employees and attend to the nation's urgent business.
ADDED ON JULY 7, 2007: India's Health Minister has announced that the estimate of the number of HIV-infected people in India which, at 5.7 million, was the highest in the world has been reduced by more than half. As Reuters reported, "The new figure was calculated with the help of ... United States Agency for International Development". I have known for some time that, like his Cabinet colleague Aiyar (see letter dated July 14, 2004 below), India's Health Minister, Ramadoss, is intimately involved in the C.I.A.'s day-to-day activities in India. The C.I.A. instructed the U.S. Agency for International Development to make this reduction because of my writing (addendum dated May 31, 2007, below) that the United States had pledged an extra $30 billion to fight HIV/AIDS in other countries "But it is contact with the United States because of which countries of the world have AIDS in the first place". In letters to the press, articles and press releases over the past two decades ( see addendum of February 19-25, 2007, below), I have described how the C.I.A. roped-in India's population for use as guinea pigs for AIDS vaccine development (including how a former head of the Indian Council of Medical Research, V. Ramalingaswami, was brought to Harvard University's School of Public Health, which was responsible for this scheme in its early stages, for this purpose and how Rajiv Gandhi, when prime minister, was brought to Harvard University once he had agreed to the scheme following the disclosures of Bofors and HDW kickbacks which were made when he initially balked at the scheme) to which end India's RAW spread heroin addiction and AIDS in India's tribal Northeast and elsewhere (Aiyar is also in-charge of development of India's tribal Northeast).
ADDED ON JULY 6, 2007: The only effective action against a psychopathic serial killer, unless he can be put away for life, is death. How do you put away a country of 300 million people? In the letters below, I suggested one step-- no country in the world should allow any American, civilian or military, to set foot on its soil. This is a feasible first step. This will require first of all for them to take care of their rulers on the C.I.A.'s payroll.
It is not just the industry of the country and the bodies and minds of its engineers and others-- who serve the imperialist countries' needs, not their own-- which are progressively being owned by imperialist countries; now its land-- the country itself-- will be owned by the imperialists, as the Indian government "plans to open the agriculture sector to foreign direct investment" (Financial Express, July 6 '07, Internet) by "Pepsi, Coca Cola and even Cargill" because "the sector needs Rs. 3,00,000 crore over the next five years to achieve a 4% growth rate" but "planned state investment over the next five years would be only around... Rs. 1,49,000 crore". This is a bogus excuse because, as I have shown in the letters below, a government has an unlimited amount of capital at its disposal.
ADDED ON JULY 4, 2007: The Nature of the United States (contd.):
Sergei Ivanov has asked the United States to respond to Russia's proposals on missile defense with counterarguments, not just statements. As I said in a letter to the press several years ago, what characterizes the United States' behavior is unconditional aggression. Asking the United States for counterarguments is like the little girl held by the psychopathic serial killer (addendum of June 22 '07, below) asking him for counterarguments as to why she should be killed. (Of course, arguments can be cooked up. He may respond that then she would be in heaven. In fact, a United States official justified NATO's expansion to Russia's borders by asking why should it worry about democracies on its borders).
ADDED ON JULY 3, 2007: The Moral Superiority of the Soviet Union:
It is not enough to claim moral parity for the Soviet Union in relation to, say, the United States; justice requires recognition of its moral, social and economic superiority. By definition, a utopia is a superior society and the Soviet Union was wildly successful. Most surprisingly-- because utopias are vulnerable on this score-- it was also militarily superior-- a necessity in a world menaced by a psychopathic serial killer though the United States fully bared its fangs only after it had subverted the Soviet Union. But this subversion is reversible.
ADDED ON JULY 2, 2007: Bribery of Contact and Psychopathic Serial Killers:
According to MSNBC News Services, "Putin requested an audience with Bush on his way to Guatemala...". Apparently Putin was reciprocating Bush's 'refueling stop' in Moscow on the way to Hanoi with the obvious purpose of inducing Putin to take the initiative to meet him at the airport (addendum dated November 15 '06, below) because, after my reference to the 'bribery of contact' on August 29 '06, below, Putin had started emphasizing contacts with other countries, instead. But what I have said about the bribery of contact (on May 31 '07, within the addendum dated June 1 '07, below) and about psychopathic serial killers (on June 22 '07, below) bears repeating and such contact does nothing to advance and, possibly fatally, injures his country's interests.
In preparation for Putin's visit with Bush, the FSB killed a former Russian Muslim inmate of Guantanamo "who was a suspect in the 1999 bombings of apartment buildings in Moscow" [Associated Press, June 28 '07]. In a letter to the press at the time those bombings occurred, I had said they were carried out by Russian intelligence agencies (this has since been publicly confirmed by numerous knowledgeable Russians including former Russian intelligence officers and the later Beslan massacre in Russia is squarely blamed by Beslan residents on Russian intelligence agencies) and chided them for imitating India's RAW which has been carrying out such terrorist acts since 1983. The killing of this Russian Muslim was a gift Putin brought to Bush for the visit, like the flowers and kisses he gave to his wife and mother and was a renewal of Russia's participation in C.I.A.- orchestrated terrorist acts around the world (I have pointed out in the letters below how the London train bombings a couple of years ago were such acts; so were the terrorist acts in the UK a couple days ago) against which the United States is fighting its war against terrorism. But Russia's re-enrollment in it (to provide cover for it, a RIA-Novosti report on June 29 '07 said "U.S. intelligence chief concerned over ... increased levels of Russian intelligence operations against the United States") is the least of the consequences of such contact; much more important for Russia is the effect it has on Russia's ability to defend itself from the NATO encroachment on its borders, the U.S. missile bases being set up in Central Europe and the numerous other ways the United States has been destroying and subjugating Russia (as an instance of starving and destroying Russia's aircraft industry that I have referred to earlier in these letters, Putin recently reversed an earlier decision-- that had been prompted by my comments-- and awarded a contract to supply 22 jumbo jets for Aeroflot to Boeing, 22 jumbo jets for Aeroflot to Airbus and then, apparently on Ivanov's prompting, placed an order for six jumbo jets with a Russian manufacturer of jumbo jets).
ADDED ON JUNE 30, 2007: Time for Kalam to do his duty:
When I said "not worry about any politics", I meant not worry about any political fallout. Kalam still has time to do his duty to the country-- which is on the brink of catastrophe (Rashtrapati means someone who takes care of the nation)-- and not worry about any political fallout. He should dismiss Manmohan Singh and his cabinet who serve at his pleasure with a one-sentence order withdrawing his pleasure from their continuing in office, appoint an interim prime minister and cabinet of his choosing ("I am no longer pleased to have Shri Manmohan Singh and the rest of the Council of Ministers continue in office and hereby discharge them and appoint so-and-so as interim prime minister, this order to take effect as soon as the interim prime minister is sworn in by me"), dissolve parliament and call new elections. (The presidential election can be held after the new parliament convenes).
ADDED ON JUNE 22, 2007: The Nature of the United States:
[Associated Press, Washington, June 21 '07]: "...members of Russia's parliament held a friendly discussion with members of Congress. But... chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee raised questions about Russia's human rights record, restrictions on press freedom and anti-U.S. rhetoric by Russian leaders. His counterpart in the Duma... said Russians "are sometimes puzzled and disappointed by some statements that come from the U.S."..." Well, anyone who is puzzled and disappointed by aggression from the United States is unfit to be a guardian of his country's interests but can be retrained and rehabilitated. The United States has successfully subverted and destroyed-- militarily and economically as well as in other ways-- the great Soviet Union and turned Russia into a beggar that takes money from the United States to destroy its own defenses and be taught how to live, think and behave. But the brain-washing the Russians have undergone is no more irreversible than that undergone by Patty Hearst from the Symbionese Liberation Army.
A little girl held by a serial psychopathic killer in the United States a few years ago, who had already killed her parents and later raped, tortured and killed her, asked him according to her killer's account in media reports "What is going to happen to me?" and he replied "Honey, you are going to be in heaven with your parents". Many victims of such psychopathic killers have the illusion that if they are nice to their captors and engage in 'normal' social interaction with them, they will be spared. Putin's visit to Bush's parents' home to socialize with him is such an attempt but it will not save his country, nor the 'friendly discussions' Duma members hold with their American counterparts.
THIRD ADDENDUM DATED JUNE 21, 2007: So long as Kalam is President, he has both the right and the duty to dismiss Manmohan Singh and his Cabinet-- who serve at his pleasure-- for treason in the nuclear field-- and not worry about any politics.
SECOND ADDENDUM DATED JUNE 21, 2007: Enemies and partners:
Russia was the leader in ABM research and, even after a hiatus of two decades, can pick it back up from the shelves and quickly and visibly leave the United States behind. This will reverse the United States' conspicuous lack of respect for Russia and the rest of the world which underlies so many of the world's problems. More than any other work, Mahatma Gandhi was a great devotee of the Bhagvad Gita, a philosophical work whose central point consists of a teacher exhorting a leader-- who had put down his arms due to an aversion to killing his friends and kinsmen with a conspicuous lack of respect-- to pick them up and do his duty. The situation in the world today requires exactly that.
ADDED ON JUNE 21, 2007: The murder of journalists:
A headline in Kommersant of June 20 '07 said "U.S. Congress eager to investigate murder of reporters in Russia". Well, the Editor of an ethnic Indian newspaper in New York which carried a front page report on the crimes against me was sent to American jail for several years and a press cartoonist in New Delhi who 'showed my influence' was tortured and brutally murdered at the C.I.A.'s instructions. These are just two examples of hundreds of such acts by the C.I.A. Let the U.S. Congress investigate the media silence described below:-
On June 19 '07, the following letter (with background material) was E-Mailed to about 100 major United States media outlets as well as the campaign headquarters of U.S. presidential candidate Obama whose apology referred to in the letter was national news and the subject of much impassioned commentary, for example, in the Chicago Tribune. Not a single response from any of them has been received:-
"A U.S. presidential candidate has apologized for a memo that criticized the Clintons' links to some Indian-Americans. In fact, heinous crimes are behind these links.
A shareholder lawsuit against an Indian American who is Bill Clinton's first and closest Indian 'buddy' with whom he plays golf and cards, goes on joint vacations in his corporate jet, etc. accuses the former of showering millions of dollars in inappropriate favors on the Clintons. The genesis of this relationship is in crimes that I will be glad to describe if asked."
ADDED ON JUNE 19, 2007: A U.S. presidential candidate has apologized for a memo that criticized the Clintons' links to some Indian-Americans. In fact, heinous crimes are behind these links.
A shareholder lawsuit against an Indian-American who is Bill Clinton's first and closest Indian 'buddy' with whom he plays golf and cards, goes on joint vacations in his corporate jet, etc. accuses the former of showering millions of dollars in inappropriate favors on the Clintons. The genesis of this relationship is in crimes that I will be glad to describe if asked.
ADDED ON JUNE 12, 2007: In observing the 150th anniversary of the 1857 mutiny, Indians have failed to ask an elementary question: how come a handful of the British were able to put down a rebellion by much larger numbers of armed Indian soldiers in a country thousands of miles away from England while immersed in a sea of Indians-- and has anything changed since then? The answer is that armed Indians, particularly the Sikhs, helped them put down the rebellion. An account of a Sikh soldier in a jeep carrying a British viceroy in the 20th Century described how he cut down with his submachine gun any Indian-- man woman or child-- who came in view on either side of the road. Though about one percent of the population, Sikhs have been about twentyfive percent of the officer corps of the Indian army even after 1947. The present army chief is the first Sikh to hold that position. Because of my references to Vajpayee's treason, the service chiefs had stopped saluting Vajpayee as prime minister or seeing him off at the airport. The present army chief has resumed doing that for no other reason than that the prime minister is a fellow Sikh and he has a tradition of loyalty to India's colonial masters to uphold. Manmohan Singh justifies his treason in the nuclear field by saying that Vajpayee when prime minister negotiated a similar deal. But the fact is no such deal occurred and the brazen treachery and servility to the white master he openly displays is of a different order of magnitude altogether. When Oxford University offered him an honorary doctorate, he went running like a puppy dog on all fours and furiously licked the boots of the white master for two whole days.
Kalam should have stepped in and stopped the deal, but he is too timid. The Army should have stopped the deal but it is led by a Sikh traitor. Will the Supreme Court do it?
Satish Chandra
ADDED ON JUNE 7, 2007: Russia a vassal of the United States:-
Incorporating former Soviet republics into NATO and bringing U.S. strategic nuclear forces & military bases within the former Warsaw pact and Soviet republics require a full-spectrum response like that to German armies crossing Soviet borders. Without countering subversion, developing new weapons alone will be ineffective against this invasion which has more than just a military dimension. Even at a purely military level, an 'asymmetric response' will be like an asymmetric response to the advancing German armies; it is even worse than saying we will let them take Stalingrad and Leningrad without resistance but will act if they try to take Moscow; now, as then, there is no alternative to destroying the enemy or being destroyed. Stalin's measures to industrialize the Soviet Union came just in time to save it; it will require comparable strength of character now. The Soviet Union was destroyed by subversion by the C.I.A. as I have described in the letter sequence below (it did not lose an arms race) which brought large sections of the K.G.B. on its payroll and was also responsible for the quick succession of deaths of Soviet leaders-- Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Chernenko of whom at least the latter was murdered -- and eventually installed its handpicked candidate-- Gorbachev. As I mentioned in the letter sequence below , a former senior C.I.A. official referred to Yeltsin as "a creature of C.I.A. support". In the first election under the new Russian Constitution, the Communist party head, Zyuganov, was leading Yeltsin by a large margin but the results were manipulated to make Yeltsin president, as is often done in India-- as I know from personal experience when I ran for India's parliament-- via India's principal intelligence agency which, like most Indian prime ministers and other politicians, is on the payroll of the C.I.A. and functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India. Both in Russia and in India, the press is controlled by their intelligence agencies which mold public opinion in favor of the United States. As I have said in the letter sequence below, when the United States talks of exporting democracy, it means exporting rule by the C.I.A. The control of Ukraine's and Georgia's presidents by the United States is so blatant they hardly try to hide it. Of course, there was a full-spectrum response to Germany's armies. But the American armed forces have already taken Stalingrad and Leningrad without resistance, as is seen in their name change and the fact that while paying tribute to the courage of the millions of Soviet citizens who fought and laid down their lives, present day leaders dared not even mention the name of the leader who led them. This shows that no matter what weapons they develop, these leaders will not defend even Moscow.
Iran has not intimidated Russian leaders to an extent that they dare not utter the name of their leader who led them while they pay tribute to the millions who fought and laid down their lives and cannot do so, but the United States has. After their meeting in Germany on June 7 [Associated Press], "The leaders [Putin and Bush] said they agreed that Iran and the suspicions it is developing a nuclear weapon is the threat to focus on, not each other"-- a perfect illustration of what I said that "the United States is skillful at getting "partners" to chase bogus threats... and obscure the fact that it is the one threat to the world and mankind". The intimidated state of Russian leaders (the above is an example but the intimidation exists across the board) shows Russia is a vassal of the United States, not "partner".
Russia is still destroying its nuclear defences under United States' urging and with United States' money: "(ITAR-TASS, June 7 '07) Rosatom proposes joint submarine scrapping base project to U.S.: ... Of the 198 nuclear submarines decommissioned by the Russian Navy, 148 have been scrapped, 31 of them with international financial assistance". Russia's nuclear strength was greater than that of the United States; what is the source of their leaders' intimidated and slave-like state? It is their leaders' fear of exposure, by the United States, of the bribes they have received from the United States. It was the same fear by using which the United States was able to get both Rajiv Gandhi and Vajpayee to agree to having India's population used as guinea pigs for AIDS vaccine development (see addendum of February 19-25, 2007 below) and Manmohan Singh to agree to having the United States hand-cuff and destroy India's nuclear program.
During the invasion of Iraq in March 2003, U.S. media reported that U.S. forces were 'in contact' with Iraqi generals in the field with offers of bribery and in fact successfully persuaded most of them, with bribes, not to resist. Whatever resistance was offered was by Iraqi citizens' miltias in cars and SUVs charging American tanks and being cut down by the tens of thousands without the Americans suffering a single casualty. The United States' taking of Stalingrad and Leningrad and, in fact, of Russia has used the same strategy of conquest through bribery. Countering the weapon of bribery is at least as important as nuclear weapons but don't expect Russia's leaders to do anything.
ADDED ON JUNE 1, 2007: I posted the following on a Ukrainian on-line discussion board:-
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 82
Date: May 26, 2007 10:47AM
The Soviet Union was a successful utopia. The people of Ukraine, by focusing on preserving and restoring what was good in the Soviet times
-- there was a lot that was enormously better than what is there now-- and rejecting subversion by the United States and by applying my proposal about money (see letter dated February 26, 2005 in the letter sequence posted on March 4 '07 below) can make it a much better utopia. Russia is now rejecting subversion by the United States; so can Ukraine. As we know in India, separatism has no limits: ten fragments will break into a hundred, a hundred fragments into a thousand.
Date: May 28, 2007 09:10AM
People gravitate toward the powerful. When the Czech prime minister says "US Missile Defense Plan Necessary for European Security" (Kommersant, May 28 '07), it is because he sees the United States as militarily and economically more powerful than Russia. If Russia becomes more powerful than the United States by applying my proposal about money, the Czech Republic, Poland, etc. will gravitate toward Russia. Militarily, the Soviet Union was more than a match for the United States and the economic well-being (well-being has to include a lot more than what is counted by Western economists; more cars per capita do not necessarily equal greater well-being though a country could easily provide a free car and house and a lot more to each citizen by applying my proposal about money) of Soviet citizens was also superior. At one point, Yulia Tymoshenko, when prime minister of Ukraine, seemed to be moving to apply my proposal about money to provide housing for Ukrainians. But the Americans seemed to have subverted it. Russia's finance minister described his plan to make Russia a banana republic: "[ITAR-TASS, May 27 '07] Finance minister believes Russia's inflation won't grow in near future:.../ In his opinion, "Russia has one more factor that permits larger expenditures. This is the growing import"./ "When oil prices are high, foreign currency comes into the country. When we pay for imports, currency leaves the country. Therefore, these two processes reduce high inflation risks", Kudrin said./ "Moreover, under our forecast, the two flows of money-- one received from exports of Russian goods, and another spent on imports-- will become the same by 2010, and the country's trade balance will be zero", the minister said./ "It means we will not meet such problems with inflation or sterilization of money, as it was two years ago", Kudrin concluded." Thankfully, Russia has just embarked on a 1.314 trillion ruble program of 26 national projects for technology development.
Date: May 28, 2007 04:08PM
When a general sends an army into battle, knowing many will die, he does that for a greater good. Stalin took some drastic steps to industrialize the Soviet Union. My proposal about money provides a much better way of doing it. Stalin sold grain abroad to get the money to buy machinery for industrialization. This resulted in hunger within the Soviet Union. My proposal about money eliminates the need for a government to sell anything to get money to use as capital. Marx's Das Kapital provided the basis for the Soviet Union. My proposal about money is a huge advance over Marx. My proposal about money does not require communism; it can be applied just as well to an economic system in which the means of production are entirely in private hands. There have been a number of surveys of Russians who have seen both the Soviet system and the system there now; by and large those who have lived as adults in both systems prefer the Soviet system. I know something about violence and deprivation and torture in the United States. I was publicly tortured in a Harvard University seminar. I went without food up to three weeks at a time and my weight dropped to about 90 pounds and less. Just four years ago, a U.S. government agency tampered with eye medication during transit and successfully made me completely blind-- and I remained blind for a year and a half. There is something worse than a gulag-- in which I have been living for 30 years (see the letter sequence posted below on March 4, 2007), as this U.S. government agency and its collaborators in India and Russia know. All this because of the color of my skin and because my work had put me in a position of leadership in my field as a scientist. See [http://www.psychotherapy.eboard.com/] . Everyone has heard of the persecution of Sakharov in the Soviet Union. This is an infinitely worse case of the persecution of a scientist but no one has heard of it because the evil empire -- the United States-- responsible for it is so much more evil and so much more powerful.
Date: May 31, 2007 03:03AM
The Iron Curtain against subversion by the United States was necessary for the military and economic strengthening of the Soviet Union. An Iron Curtain against subversion by the United States now will have to be drawn around the United States. It is possible with leaders with character, which are hard to come by. The Iron Curtain will not be against views but against bribery, including the bribery of contact (a bribe changes the behavior of the bribe-receiver in favor of the bribe-giver; engaging in polite, social intercourse with a mortal enemy of your country-- whom you ought to be vaporizing at the first opportunity-- changes your behavior in favor of the enemy even more powerfully than a monetary bribe and this change generalizes to other times and places when you are not in personal contact). A foolish leader who shakes hands or breaks bread with a mortal enemy of his country is engaging in or changing his behavior in favor of his enemy to an extent that even military conquest and occupation of his country by the enemy cannot accomplish. There are other threats to survival from contact with an evil entity such as the United States. Headline: "US to spend extra $30 bn to fight HIV/Aids, pledges Bush [on May 30 '07]". But it is contact with the United States because of which countries of the world have AIDS in the first place. If you cannot quarantine a rabid dog, you shoot it. Like decoys given out by an ICBM, the United States is skillful at getting "partners" to chase bogus threats (or threats which, like AIDS, originate from itself) and obscure the fact that it is the one threat to the world and mankind. "Identification of friend or foe" is essential to dealing with decoys and so is avoiding identifying an enemy as friend or partner.
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 19-25, 2007: When it comes to fooling their people, a little gesture-- even a purely verbal one-- always made at the C.I.A.'s instructions, by C.I.A.-controlled rulers, in both India and Russia, goes a long way and can keep their people fooled for many years. In the letter dated May 11, 2005, below, I gave an example of such a gesture by Vajpayee. Manmohan Singh has made such gestures ("assurances") in connection with the nuclear deal. Putin's recent strongly 'anti-American' speech in Munich was such a gesture. He immediately followed it up by removing the Defence Minister for saying that Russia's destruction of Intermediate Range missiles, which threatened the United States' NATO allies, was a blunder and, on February 15, told the Defence Ministry to continue the destruction of Russia's defences by converting defence industries to civilian production, etc., even as he paid lip service to checking NATO's advance to Russia's borders in Munich. A couple of years ago, he made a similar verbal gesture by saying that the collapse of the Soviet Union was the biggest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century. Since the collapse was engineered by the C.I.A., wouldn't undoing the C.I.A.'s handiwork be logical? But he has continued to advance the C.I.A.'s agenda by, for example, increasing the price of gas to Ukraine, Georgia and Belarus three or fourfold, driving them further apart from Russia. A couple of years ago, a United States senator referred to Putin as a "spoiled child" because of the bribes given to him. But he earns his keep from the Americans a trillionfold.
Yesterday's explosions and fire in the Samjhauta Express to Pakistan, killing 66, a day before Pakistan's Foreign Minister's arrival for talks, was meant to 'neutralise' the feelings engendered by the similar fire in the train in Godhra and is typical of operations carried out by RAW under C.I.A. instructions.
After my reference (addendums from December 12 '06 to January 9 '07 below) to RAW/C.I.A.'s plan to have India's engineering graduates work as software coolies providing payroll processing and such to American companies, C. N. R. Rao said he had told Manmohan Singh -- whose Science Advisor he is -- that I.T. cannot be India's "future" (I had written-- letter dated November 15 '06 below-- that after Manmohan Singh started seeking contact with Brazil, South Africa and NAM instead, "The C.I.A. arranged for him to be given another honorary doctorate, this time from Oxford, by Prince Philip, knowing he will find it difficult to turn it down and he is back giving away India's future to C.I.A.-sponsored schemes"). To 'neutralise' what I wrote about the honorary doctorate to Manmohan Singh from Oxford, "C. N. R. Rao to get Oxford University honorary doctorate [UNI, Bangalore, Feb. 23 '07]... a rare and unique honour on him according to a release from the Centre here today". This is only the latest of hundreds of such acts of 'neutralisation' as well as suppression and harassment of India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian by C.I.A./RAW over the past thirty years, to keep India weak, poor and enslaved.
After Rao's comment to Manmohan Singh about I.T. and India's "future", prompted by what I wrote about SEZs and I.T. below, Manmohan Singh had stopped the approval of SEZs. Now, along with the honorary doctorate from Oxford to Rao, Manmohan Singh ( actually C.I.A./RAW) has started approving SEZs again, with an Indonesian SEZ, in chemicals rather than I.T., with the Indian Oil Corporation as the "anchor investor", as the opening wedge.
C.I.A./RAW have also rescinded the funding (promised after my reference, below, to adopting the total destruction of the C. I. A. at the earliest possible date as "India's national mission") for manned space missions and missions to other planets since technology is the means by which India is kept in slavery and Indians must be kept digging ditches at Rs. 60 per day under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme.
Regarding the arrest of Quattrocci in Argentina in connection with the Bofors case: I have described in articles and letters to the press from 1987 on how the Bofors and HDW kickback exposures were orchestrated by the C.I.A., starting with Swedish goverment radio, to coerce Rajiv Gandhi into having India's population used as guinea pigs for the development of an AIDS vaccine, how Rajiv Gandhi, who had first balked at the demand, along with Vajpayee (who was then in the Opposition) agreed to have India's tribal population in the Northeast used for this purpose and how RAW then spread heroin addiction and AIDS in India's Northeast for this purpose under instructions from the C.I.A. which had been given the task of rounding up a population for use as guinea pigs for AIDS vaccine development. Once Rajiv Gandhi and Vajpayee agreed to the demand, no one had any incentive to further pursue the kickbacks and that is why the Bofors case has not gone anywhere.
ADDED DECEMBER 12 '06 to JANUARY 9 '07: The nuclear deal is an issue over which political parties must refuse to let Parliament do anything till the deal is canceled and mobilise the masses on a war footing. Anything less is meekly going to India's and their own slaughter.
If Manmohan Singh's brazenly lying and misleading Parliament on the nuclear deal is not cause for a no-confidence motion, what is? Mukherjee's confidence that despite some "political flak" the deal will get through was based on knowing that the BJP and Left leaders also will obey their American bribe-givers (and not just the bribery of contact). If Kalam had told Manmohan Singh to seek consensus, where is the consensus after the written statements of the BJP and the Left on the deal? It is time for him to act in this matter of supreme national importance, instead of flying around the country inaugurating culverts and fly-overs, like the BJP stalling Parliament and starting mass agitations on any and every issue except the nuclear issue.
The Americans are now planning to force India to modify its Thorium-based power generation program so it is "proliferation-resistant", so India is not able to get fissile material from it that could be made into weapons and are binding India into cooperating with their 'non-proliferation' initiatives for this purpose. Recently, the foreign minister of Pakistan, which has a minimal nuclear deterrent like India, said if Pakistan had not obeyed America after 9/11, the Americans would have come and done themselves what they told Pakistan to do and Pakistan would have been in the same condition that Iraq and Afghanistan are today (I heard an American radio host in Boston threaten an Indian caller similarly after 9/11 and India at least allowed American helicopters to monitor Kalpakkam and Arundhati Ghosh, India's former nuclear negotiator, said at the time she believed India was in a rollback mode of its nuclear program under American threats). Clearly, Pakistan had no deterrent against the United States. How many nuclear warheads can India launch against the United States and with what delivery vehicles? I have said India needs a minimum of ten thousand strategic nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them. Till it has them, India must not put a single additional reactor under IAEA inspections or safeguards beyond the ones that are already under such inspections and there should be no separation of civilian and military nuclear reactors. And it should never, ever, allow the United States, its number one enemy, with an infinite capacity and inclination for fraud and force, anywhere near its nuclear program. As I have said, when it comes to the United States, especially in nuclear matters, especially in dealings with non-white countries, agreements, laws, treaties, etc. mean nothing; only raw power counts. Among other things, it is planning to have Indian nuclear scientists work under American supervision and control. C.I.A. agent Mukherjee, while lying about India's technological capabilities in the nuclear field and thanking Bush for making proposed Indian dependence and slavery in this field possible, glowingly refers to plans to have Indian nuclear scientists work with American scientists (as a part of India's C.I.A.-controlled press, Hindustan Times in an editorial supporting the nuclear deal a couple days ago said India lacks advanced nuclear technology because Indians can only design and build nuclear reactors upto 220 MW whereas the international norm is 1,000 MW; in fact, India is building reactors upto 650 MW and, while opposing the import of 1,000 MW Russian reactors a few years ago, Indian nuclear scientists said that India's power transmission and distribution grids-- which are not under their control-- cannot handle the output of 1,000 MW reactors; Indian reactor designs are far in advance of American designs). A main purpose of having Indian nuclear scientists work with American scientists is to have them design 'proliferation-resistant' reactors for its Thorium-based power generation program so India cannot get fissile material for weapons from it; in other words, have them cut their own and India's throat.
A feature in the Hindustan Times of December 12 '06 sought to justify the nuclear deal on the grounds that imported Uranium will be needed for the proliferation-resistant Thorium reactors; in other words, the greatest advantage of a Thorium-based power programme-- abundant fuel at home and no need for imports-- is sought to be defeated, to bring and keep India under American boots. The Americans are dangling the bait of a chance of living and working in the United States with American-level salaries-- like computer programmers on H-1B visas-- before Indian nuclear scientists. Significantly, a Christian former head of the nuclear research center in Kalpakkam became the first Indian scientist to welcome this financial incentive and reverse his opposition to the nuclear deal because of it. By bribing Russia's presidents and others, the Americans have successfully induced the Russians to destroy most of their nuclear defences-- including the destruction of 197 nuclear-armed submarines with American and other Western money-- and have established considerable American control over the weapons that remain through cooperative 'non-proliferation' programs to 'secure' their weapons and other nuclear assets which American senators come to inspect regularly.
A few years back I pointed out in a letter to the press that the slave countries of the world can quickly and easily acquire great power, equal to the superpowers' power, by means of radiological weapons that spread radioactive material over a large area and pointed out that half a dozen 2-inch or 3-inch mortars-- which any army in the world has-- could cover a city the size of London with radioactive material in a matter of minutes, making it totally uninhabitable. I ended by saying 'The slave countries are not used to having great power, equal to the superpowers' power, in their hands but that is what they have now.' After that letter, such radiological or 'dirty' bombs became a subject of much study, discussion and countermeasures, unfortunately treating them as weapons in the hands of terrorists rather than deterrents in the hands of state actors. An Op-Ed in the New York Times of December 19, 2006 points out that 'dirty bombs' using Polonium-210 (which has been in the news recently in connection with the death of a former Russian spy in London) as the radioactive material can get around the countermeasures because the kind of radiation (Alpha radiation) they emit is extremely easy to shield, so it would be extremely easy to bring such bombs into a target country without detection. A country such as Pakistan or India which may not have conventional nuclear weapons for use as a deterrent beyond a thousand miles or so from its borders can have an effective deterrent that covers the globe by using dirty bombs made with Polonium-210. This marks a decisive change in the world's balance of power. Such 'dirty bombs' using Polonium-210 can be made and put in place in a matter of days and can bridge the gap for countries such as India and Pakistan till they have an adequate number of the usual kind of nuclear bombs and the means to deliver them to any point on the globe. There is no need for Indians to meekly go to India's and their own slaughter. Thus, for example, there is no need for India to put up with the thuggery by which the United States claims a right to buy/sell all the Uranium it wants but denies that right to India unless India enters into a slave relationship with the United States and binds itself into the kind of agreement being imposed on it.
Slavery in nuclear matters also makes possible slavery in economic matters. In Special Economic Zones (SEZs), American companies use Indians as slave laborers-- paying them a fraction of what even the lowest paid American workers are paid-- to produce goods and services for the American consumer. In no way can the output of Special Economic Zones be considered a part of India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP), nor should the output of software export and call center, etc. (B.P.O.) operations--which meet the needs of American companies and American consumers-- be considered a part of India's GDP and most of the rise in GDP growth rate, being trumpeted by traitors, is from the SEZs and IT and B.P.O. operations. If a foreign enemy comes and commandeers millions of Indians to work as slave labor to meet the needs of its own people-- having them work within India rather than shipping them to America as slaves used to be shipped through native middlemen to pick cotton-- it is still slavery. I have written about the fallacy because of which exports and earning a lot of foreign exchange are considered a good thing and said 'A crore of goods and services sold domestically is worth several crores of goods and services sold abroad so far as the effect on India's prosperity is concerned'. The foreign exchange (such as dollars) you get by selling goods and services abroad can only ultimately be used to buy goods and services abroad which starts chains of economic activity in the foreign country (the United States) rather than in your own country and, through the 'multiplier effect' I have described, increases the GDP of the foreign country by several times the amount of the foreign exchange you obtained, not your own country's. A report on a mega refinery complex being set up in an SEZ on India's west coast by Reliance refers to the several thousand luxurious villas that will be built for foreign workers while Indian slave laborers will live in slave housing; the output of the refinery --gasoline-- will be used almost exclusively by American consumers but the environmental harm caused by the refinery will occur in India; by using Indian companies as a front-- in this case Reliance into which Americans will be putting their money-- American capital will be producing gasoline for American consumers using Indians as slave labor and transferring the pollution caused by the refineries to India. In no way can this SEZ be called a part of India's economy. Even in the IT sector, the largest Indian company-- Infosys-- is more than half owned by foreigners; hundreds of thousands of engineering graduates per year are being produced by Indian engineering colleges -- RAW, which runs the Indian government, acts as a branch of the C.I.A. against India and has engineered this use of Indian engineering graduates-- to work as software coolies for American companies (you do not need engineering graduates to provide payroll processing which is what Indian software coolies have mostly been doing) while many others work night shifts in the B.P.O. industry, in call centers, doing what does not require even a high school education to do in the United States. SEZs were set up in China by bribing people in the Chinese government to let American companies use Chinese people as slave labor for American consumers and all the Chinese in government now wear Western suits and send as many Chinese for higher studies and to settle in the U.S. as do Indians. To camouflage the true nature of this arrangement, the United States government regularly 'complains' to the Chinese government about the U.S. "trade deficit" with China, but in no way can American companies producing in China, using Chinese as slave laborers, for the American consumer and then shipping the products to the United States be considered 'trade'; it is slave trade but instead of the slaves' bodies, their products are being shipped to the United States. Because of Indians knowing English, Americans first used Indians for IT and B.P.O. but are now switching to manufacture as well, the basic paradigm being the use of the populations of China and India as slave labor for the American consumer by bribing people in the governments of these countries. In the case of Russia, the paradigm is to loot Russia's natural resources for the American consumer by bribing people in the Russian government. Because of the exchange rate, the slave laborers in the B.P.O., doing health-destroying work at night at a fraction of the wage rates of the lowest paid American workers, are paid large amounts in rupees (the foreign exchange goes to the government and can only be used ultimately to buy foreign goods and services and increase the foreign country's GDP, not India's, as I have said) which enables them to buy the output of ten times as many Indians while producing nothing for the Indian economy-- the goods and services they produce meet the needs of American consumers and companies, not Indian consumers and companies. One million B.P.O. workers suck up the output of, say, ten million Indians; ten million B.P.O. workers will suck up the output of a hundred million Indians, while producing nothing for the Indian economy. Thus, American companies, while using ten million Indians as direct slave laborers, will be using a hundred million Indians as indirect slave laborers because a hundred million Indians will be supporting the ten million Indians working for American companies as slave laborers. And, since these ten million Indians will be producing nothing for the Indian economy (no goods or services for the Indian consumer) and will be sucking up the output of another one hundred million Indians-- thus, they will be greatly REDUCING India's GDP available to the rest of the population, not adding to it-- the rupee salaries paid to these ten million Indians will be highly inflationary as well, further damaging the Indian economy. This applies to operations such as call centers (B.P.O.), software export and SEZs for export.
Haryana's chief minister asked how else to provide employment to the state's population. By implementing my proposal about money (letters below), India can have true and extremely rapid prosperity and full employment.
Russia's foreign minister says "UN Security Council resolution on Iran [imposing sanctions on Iran] reflects Russia's interests". But the demand that a country obey your demands regarding non-proliferation of nuclear weapons is a demand that you will have the power to inflict instant death on that entire country without that country being able to do anything about it; it is a demand for the ultimate kind of slavery and no self-respecting country can, or ought to, submit to it. The only reasonable response to such a demand is to totally destroy such a presumptuous tyrant as soon as you are able to do so. Such a demand is a way of ensuring your own destruction in the not too distant future; it will be crazy for Iran or any other country which is subjected to such demands not to destroy you as soon as it is able to do so. Since countries like Russia are unthinking camp-followers of the United States which is the source of this attempt to impose this ultimate kind of slavery on other countries, the interests of Russia will best be served by destroying the United States as soon as possible because its mad dog behavior of trying to impose such ultimate slavery on other countries will otherwise lead to the destruction of the makers of such demands in the not too distant future.
Serious investment in defence research and development starts at ten times the present budget and manpower of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) but DRDO is too diffident to ask for it. If "it seems that DRDO can deliver successful results only when it enters into joint ventures/collaboration with foreign partners", as the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence said, it is because there is not nearly enough money or manpower being put into it. Even after twentyfold 'cost over runs', the amounts spent on developing the major weapon systems are miniscule compared to what has been spent, over many generations, by countries that have developed the necessary capabilities (Israel has unlimited access to the results of the United States' research and development; India should compare its defence research and development budget and manpower with that of the United States, not Israel). Russia has had, for many decades, entire closed cities--dozens of them, each with upto tens of thousands of scientists and engineers, who have been given priority access to the nation's resources, for living as well as research-- devoted to defence research and development. A tenfold increase in defence research and development will cost not much more than the cost of printing the money (see letters below) and will greatly benefit the economy as a whole as well. India produces five times the number of engineering graduates per year the United States does; instead of having them work as software coolies providing payroll processing to American companies, have them work as engineers, as in defence research and development. I have suggested having ten DRDOs, each the size of the current DRDO, and have three of them compete on a successful fighter plane, three on a successful tank design and so on and let the best one win. They will also come up with weapon concepts that no one so far has thought of. It is also crucial to tackle sabotage by RAW-- which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India-- which it carries out in various ways. In Russia, a switch to foreign collaboration in technology development has been an important part of the C.I.A.'s strategy, implemented through its president, for killing off Russia's technological capabilities. In India, along with the nuclear 'deal', meant to kill off India's capabilities, superior to the United States', in the nuclear power field and to bring India's nuclear power and weapons programs under U.S. control, there has been a move to make India dependent on the U.S. for defence hardware-- implemented by the C.I.A. through RAW, through Manmohan Singh and Mukherjee, through a recent media campaign against DRDO (this was also meant to prevent Kalam from preventing Manmohan Singh continuing with his treason in the nuclear field) aimed at bringing India under U.S. control in the defence field via collaboration with U.S. firms and the call for defence research and development collaborations by the Parliamentary committee is a continuation of that.
An immediate tenfold increase in defence research and development budget and manpower, with further increases later, should be the focus; everything else will follow. India, an extremely rich country in manpower, materials and, yes, money, behaves like a beggar; it has to stop behaving like this; that is the first pre-requisite for defence.
Manmohan Singh's subservience to the white man is so deep-seated, so frank, so unshakeable that each day's delay in removing him from office further wounds India. The program to have every member of the 1979 IAS batch undergo "training" under Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government, etc.-- which is the same as having them trained by American government officials-- makes them psychologically subservient to the United States and establishes an overtly colonial relationship. The program, to cost 45 crores, is the "brainchild" of Manmohan Singh (The Telegraph, January 7 '07, Internet). If his head were cut off for treason and put under the tread of a moving Arjun tank, all that will come out is dog-faeces-- that is why he has been given so many doctorates, honorary and regular, by Oxford and Cambridge-- and it will do more for India's defence than anything India's armed forces have done in the last 59 years. Couldn't Indians-- from academia and elsewhere-- read the case studies mentioned in the report and adapt them for a training program by Indians? But that would not have served the main purpose of the program-- originated by the C.I.A. through RAW-- which is to have India's government thoroughly and overtly subservient to the United States.
The Nationalist Congress Party has called for a special session of Parliament to condemn the execution of Saddam Hussein. The United States has just started attacking Somalia with impunity while a C.I.A.-controlled group, ULFA (I have said the C.I.A. controls almost all terrorist groups in the Indian subcontinent either through RAW or its counterparts) has just committed mass-killings in India. India should use its tactical and strategic nuclear weapons (I showed how in 1998; I said India should warn that foreign ships blockading Iraq will be sunk with tactical nuclear weapons unless they leave by a certain date and strategic targets-- their largest cities-- in their home countries will be destroyed with strategic nuclear weapons if there is any retaliation--and start with the weakest countries taking part in the blockade first; the same can be done now) to eject the United States from Iraq, not just "condemn".
ADDED ON DECEMBER 9, 2006: It is time for Kalam to remove this government without further ado. India's survival depends on it.
ADDED ON NOVEMBER 15, 2006: The behavior engineering the C.I.A. uses to control leaders of other countries is seen in the following examples. After the letter dated August 29, 2006 below, Gorbachev brought out a book on a session of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The C.I.A. arranged for an East European country to hold a conference on Prestroika, with its head of state present, knowing Gorbachev will find it difficult to refuse attendance, while Bush senior made an appearance via video conferencing. Soon the C.I.A. had Gorbachev back on American universities’ lecture circuit. The Americans told the Russians Bush junior will make a refueling stop in Moscow on the way to Hanoi, calculating this will ‘force’ Putin to SEEK contact with Bush and, as a result, Putin is back talking about joining the WTO, using pension money as a financial tool, the necessity of foreign and domestic bank loans for investment, etc. After the letter dated August 29 ‘06 below, Manmohan Singh said he is basically a teacher, realizing that Bush having him and his wife for dinner had induced him to give away India’s future in the C.I.A.-sponsored nuclear deal, etc. and for a short while he sought contact with Brazil, South Africa and NAM, instead. The C.I.A. arranged for him to be given another honorary doctorate, this time from Oxford, by Prince Philip, knowing he will find it difficult to turn it down and he is back giving away India’s future to C.I.A.-sponsored schemes. To protect their countries and destroy their countries’ enemy, leaders have to reject contact with their countries’ enemy, no matter how compelling the bribery of such contact in their past.
ADDED ON AUGUST 29, 2006: In capturing Russia's Ivanov, the United States has been using the tactics it has used so successfully to capture and destroy the Soviet Union and to keep India in slavery. Military and economic strength exceeding the United States' ( I have shown how to acquire that very quickly) and inoculation of leaders against contact-- contact equals bribery-- are both needed for the necessary step: the total destruction of the C.I.A. at the earliest possible date.
ADDED ON AUGUST 11-22, 2006: What the NDA said it wants in the memorandum it gave to Kalam on August 11 '06 is less stupid and slavish than what Manmohan Singh wants to do; but it is still profoundly stupid and slavish. The import of nuclear technology or fuel is neither needed nor desirable. There should be no deal, period.
India's centuries-old and continuing rape by the white man is reflected in the fact that C.I.A.-ruled India's stupid and slavish people want a white European housewife to rule them but no one has heard of India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian. The total destruction of the C.I.A. at the earliest possible date should be India's national mission and, for this, India needs a minimum of 10,000 strategic nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them. This scientist's proposal for unlimited capital, being suppressed by the C.I.A., provides the means to do that and a lot more. Parliament should adopt a resolution making the total destruction of the C.I.A. at the earliest possible date India's national mission.
Everyone has forgotten that, as Jaswant Singh correctly said, the C.I.A. is still being provided with information about India's nuclear program from the PMO, with Manmohan Singh's knowledge and cooperation and his 'assurances' on the 'deal' (which is a C.I.A. operation that has been in the works for over a decade) are part of C.I.A.-dictated tactics to get its hands on India's nuclear program. This government should be removed by Kalam without delay.
A C.I.A.-sponsored writer in The Pioneer referred to "a loose security umbrella" from the U.S. to replace India's own nuclear weapons as an objective of the 'deal' and another C.I.A.-sponsored writer, in Indian Express, is pushing to get on with the next step, of making India overtly a U.S. satellite, with the success on the 'deal' in the Rajya Sabha.
This is no time for India's air force chief to pay a ten day visit "aimed at strengthening India's defence ties" with 'a major global power' that is working furiously to rob India of its nuclear arms and other defences and any semblance of independence and to keep it in the pits of economic and political slavery to itself. RAW arranges such visits on orders of the C.I.A. In part, this has been arranged to forestall the removal of this government for its treason in nuclear matters and to co-opt the armed forces in the treason.
With the Rajya Sabha failing to take any effective action to block the treasonous 'deal', the BJP has resumed its game of forcing adjournments of the Lok Sabha over trivial issues till the clock runs out. They should have EXTENDED the Monsoon session, not curtailed it. With so many politicians at the top of various political parties on the C.I.A.'s payroll, it is hard for the C.I.A. to lose, or for India to win. Kalam should speak up about removing this government, even if the C.I.A./RAW has sent the Air Force and Army chiefs out of the country for extended periods.
From the Rashtrapati Bhavan communique of August 19 '06, when Kalam had summoned Manmohan Singh that day, he had apparently told the latter to seek a 'sense of the house' resolution on the nuclear deal. That is why the BJP has resumed forcing adjournments of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. They have chosen 'Vande Mataram' as the issue because of my reference to India's centuries-old and continuing rape by the white man (which is what this 'deal' is-- rape, to be followed by murder).
ADDED ON AUGUST 5, 2006: As I have said, nothing short of a resolution rejecting the nuclear deal in its totality will do. The inspections agreement with the IAEA that has already been rushed through will have to be explicitly repudiated. This bugger (Manmohan Singh) will have to be hanged for treason.
After my comment about large, unexploited Uranium deposits in India, a U.S. Assistant Secretary of State testified before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in connection with the 'deal', saying that technologies for heavy water production, Uranium enrichment and spent fuel reprocessing should remain a matter of regulations rather than law. This testimony was meant to deceive Indians into thinking that India does not have its own heavy water production or Uranium enrichment or spent fuel reprocessing/Plutonium separation technologies. In fact, India has been producing heavy water for five decades and its heavy water production plants produce all the heavy water it needs and can produce all the heavy water it will ever need. It has its own Uranium enrichment technologies, both centrifuge and laser, more advanced than U.S. technologies (at a seminar, an Indian scientist said the 'deal' was meant to enable the U.S. to steal India's superior nuclear technologies through the IAEA inspections). India has had its own spent fuel reprocessing/Plutonium separation technology and its reprocessing plants have been in operation for decades. There is absolutely no aspect of the nuclear power (or weapons) technologies which India needs to import from other countries. I have said this before in these letters but India's C.I.A.-controlled press keeps misleading the Indian people and politicians. The only 'justification' for the 'deal' is being able to import Uranium ore. But India's 3-stage nuclear power program is based on Thorium, which is available in abundance in the sands on the beaches of Kerala, not Uranium. Even if it were to be Uranium-based, there is enough Uranium in the country. The whole 'deal' is based on massive and brazen lies, with a compliant Indian press going along, under C.I.A. instructions through RAW. This should be obvious to anyone with even minimal knowledge of India's nuclear program. Even if Indian legislators are ignorant about the presence of heavy water production, Uranium enrichment and Plutonium separation technologies in India, there was a long report on India's unexploited Uranium deposits in the Northeast in Indian Express (on July 3 '06, Internet) which shows how the 'deal' with the U.S. is being pushed through by RAW by suppressing India's own Uranium reserves:
"[PTI, July 3, 2006, Shillong] Meghalaya promises 9500 tonnes of uranium: The Atomic Minerals Directorate (AMD) has found uranium oxide reserve, estimated to be about 9500 tonnes in about 9.22 million tonnes of ore, in Meghalaya...This 'significant' reserve with an average grade of 0.104 per cent of uranium oxide (0308) was found over an area of two sq km...in Domiasiat area in West Khasi Hills district ... Uranium Corporation of India Ltd (UCIL), a public sector enterprise under the administrative control of the DAE, was established as an agency to mine and process uranium ore in the country. The UCIL had approached Meghalaya government about a decade ago... but no decision was taken by the government till date. He said the UCIL had submitted a formal application for uranium mining to the West Khasi Hills district deputy commissioner on October 15, 2001--which was "still under scrutiny". The latter had asked the Corporation to submit "consent of land owners and surveyed maps". But till date, UCIL was yet to reach the state government with the documents. "After the application has been received (from UCIL), it will be then decided by the state government whether to allow or disallow uranium mining in the state after examining all pro and cons... the matter was examined by a cabinet committee on economic affairs on January 15, 2004... a team comprising ministers, senior officers and NGOs from Meghalaya visited the UCIL's uranium mining project at Jaduguda in Jharkhand during March 8-10, 2004. After the team's tour, no report was received on serious mine accidents, the health condition of mine workers, school children and people around the mines appeared to be 'normal' and no case of ailment of physical deformity due to radiation could be confirmed, he said... a report from Bhaba Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai was also sought regarding radiological impact of the proposed uranium mining operation in Domiasiat area to ensure that the health and safety of the people living in the area were not affected, he said. The BARC report indicated that "at the estimated dose of 0.02 millisievert per year in public domain in the immediate vicinity attributable to the mining operations, no undesirable health impact is expected". Assuring the house on the apprehension of health hazard, the government would keep in mind the interest of all the people of the state and country in taking a decision. Earlier, Sawkmie quoting press reports said that UCIL had applied for uranium mining which was pending with district authorities."
But neither Indian Express or the rest of the press nor Indian legislators show any awareness of its implications for the 'deal'. The chief editor of Indian Express (Shekhar Gupta) is actively involved in the C.I.A.'s day-to-day activities in India as are several editors under him and its chief writer on nuclear matters (C. Raja Mohan). This is typical of the Indian media and political landscape. It is as easy for the white man today to capture and eliminate India's nuclear program as it was, for example, to buy Manhattan for a few trinckets.
India's known Uranium reserves (leaving aside deposits that will be discovered in the future) contain 78,000 tons of Uranium but India produces only 300 tons of Uranium per year. India could easily increase its Uranium production tenfold but has not done so because of "fierce environmental protests" engineered by RAW under C.I.A. instructions, to bind India into this 'deal'. A second prong in the move to enslave India is to import light water reactors. "It takes 800 tons of natural uranium just to start one light-water reactor (i.e., nearly as much uranium as India's total production for three full years)". India has two U.S. light water reactors -- everyone knows the endless grief India has endured over the years to get fuel for them-- and two Russian light water reactors were shoved down India's throat over the strenuous objections of Indian scientists as I mentioned earlier in these letters. Many, many more such reactors are planned to be imported via this 'deal', overruling-- while paying lip service to it-- India's own Thorium-based 3-stage program involving heavy water and breeder reactors, because India's own program not only does not enslave it, it will provide enormously greater amounts of fissile material for its weapons program.
Forcing Parliament to adjourn over trivial issues is a continuation of Vajpayee's tactics of forestalling a resolution on the nuclear issue (he had a state unit of the BJP give A P J Abdul Kalam a petition on some trivial issue the same day that the BJP/NDA gave him a letter on the nuclear issue).
ADDED ON AUGUST 2, 2006: Stupid Indian niggers (that is, Blackies) that they are-- how easy it was for a handful of the British to capture and rule India for centuries-- Indian MPs are talking of removing 'conditionalities' rather than rejecting the 'deal' outright; all that the U.S. has to do is establish contact with India's nuclear program; there will be plenty of opportunities to capture and eliminate it. Their dense heads cannot absorb the intelligence that even without any 'conditionalities' or 'shifting of goalposts', the 'deal' is deadly poison and the death-knell for India, not just its nuclear program.
The only excuse for the 'deal' is being able to import Uranium. But India's program is to be Thorium-based, not Uranium-based. Even if it were to be Uranium-based, "there is enough uranium in the country", says a former head of RAW in a column in the Hindustan Times of February 1, 2006. Surprising, that a former RAW head should admit to the truth in this matter. But RAW has kept quiet about India's Uranium deposits (in the Northeast) and they have been deliberately kept from being developed for unnecessarily delayed environmental clearances. The purpose is to bind India into a 'deal' with its foreign masters.
ADDED ON AUGUST 1, 2006: When I referred to starting a mass movement, I meant a mass movement on the nuclear issue (all the economic issues can be taken care of by my proposal about money; without the nuclear issue, terrorism cannot be addressed because the United States/C.I.A. instructs the organizations --governmental and other-- in India and outside which engage in terrorism; the oldest example is the LTTE and several such groups, created, trained/equipped and controlled by RAW under instructions of the C.I.A.-- the first of many operations-- such as in Punjab and Kashmir-- to accomplish India's break-up; the objectives of C.I.A.- sponsored terrorism later became diversified, as I have described in letters to the press over the years; Kargil was Pakistan army units, their commander acting under C.I.A. instructions, on one side and acts of intelligence omission by RAW, under C.I.A. instructions, on the other side, the operation meant to create support for the government of a C.I.A.- controlled politician in India; after I sent the original version of this letter on August 1 '06, U.S. intelligence agencies tried to neutralize it by giving satellite evidence of terrorist training camps in Pakistan to PTI in Washington). Resolutions similar to the one in the letter of July 28 '06 below can also be passed by state legislatures, local bodies/municipalities, all kinds of civic, professional and trade groups, labour unions, schools and colleges and public meetings ranging from dozens to millions in size.
ADDED ON JULY 30, 2006: V. S. Arunachalam was in fact the C.I.A. mole; Jaswant Singh cannot acknowledge that because on his "invitation to do something dramatic for India in electronics and communications" Arunachalam proposed the American intelligence- controlled communications network and also received "one of the nation's highest honours" AFTER Jaswant Singh knew he was a C.I.A. mole. He received the invitation and the honour because of "officers" who carry out the orders of the C.I.A. which runs the Indian government through the "officers"-- that is RAW-- and politicians it directly controls. Jaswant Singh's trip to Kandahar with the terrorists was also on the C.I.A.'s orders, through the "officers", because one American was on the plane.
ADDED ON JULY 28, 2006: The CPI's Gurudas Dasgupta, on the C.I.A.'s payroll, is opposed to a parliament resolution on the 'deal' with the U.S. but the resolution can pass without the C.P.I. The C.I.A. is trying to stall the bringing of a resolution till the session ends and to put an early end to the Monsoon session. The resolution should be brought without delay. It should simply say 'This House rejects the proposed India-U.S. nuclear agreement in its totality and enjoins the Government against any further negotiations on it'.
ADDED ON JULY 27, 2006: As I said in the letters dated July 29 '05 and July 31 '05, below, even the original 'deal' with the United States-- leaving aside the 'shifting of goal posts'-- is fatally injurious to India, not just to India's nuclear program. There should be no deal, period, and this is what the Parliament's resolution should say. Anything short of that will be ineffective. Indians simply don't know the nature of the beast they are dealing with; as I said in the letter dated March 11 '06, below, "When it comes to the United States, especially in nuclear matters, especially in dealings with non-white countries, agreements, laws, treaties, etc., mean nothing; only raw power counts... India should not let the United States anywhere near its nuclear program".
ADDED ON JULY 26, 2006: The mole in the Prime Minister's Office in the news was the science adviser, V. S. Arunachalam. This bugger was originally brought to Carnegie-Mellon University to show that scientists concerned with India's defence are NOT harassed in the United States, as part of the C.I.A.'s and RAW's moves to isolate the undersigned. Apart from the C.I.A.'s plans to destroy India's nuclear program (an abstract of a report says "For the past few years, Arunachalam and others at CMU have been involved in several different projects analyzing issues related to India's energy supply options...Tongia and Arunachalam have performed a technical assessment of India's fast breeder reactors and call into question the apparent ability of India's nuclear program in meeting long term energy needs. ...This work on India's energy options and interlocking security concerns..."), this bugger has been used to propose a computer communications network-- Sankhya Vahini--that would have made all of India's computer communications subject to American surveillance and control.
India's nuclear program is both Swadeshi and superior; it can be expanded ten or twentyfold so India exports more nuclear power plants than any country in the world, if sabotage by RAW and other C.I.A. agents is dealt with.
ADDED ON JULY 21, 2006: A columnist in The Telegraph, perplexed by the Left's logic, asks "are they so fearful of the return of the Bharatiya Janata Party that they would not mind the country being turned into a banana republic under the hegemony of the US?" The answer is that one Left politician--Yechury-- is intimately involved in the C.I.A.'s day-to-day activities in India and another--the West Bengal Chief Minister-- is on the C.I.A.'s payroll. There are others.
ADDED ON JULY 17, 2006: Russia's president says "We (Russia and the USA) are not just no longer enemies, but we already no longer consider each other as adversaries". India's prime ministers will say the same about the United States but the latter has been working furiously and successfully to destroy Russia militarily and economically and to keep India in the pits of slavery (letters below). It keeps the leaders of countries such as Russia and India which it is destroying or keeping in the pits of slavery on its payroll and gives them guards of honor, etc. It does that even to the leaders of Iraq.
ADDED ON JULY 15, 2006: The BJP's agitation about terrorism was planned at Vajpayee's residence on July 13, on the C.I.A.'s instructions to 'neutralise' my reference to "C.I.A.-sponsored terrorism" and put the focus on Pakistan as was Kasuri's statement, also made under C.I.A. instructions. It also serves to take the focus away from the nuclear 'deal' and RAW's sabotage of the Agni III and GSLV launches under C.I.A. instructions.
ADDED ON JULY 7, 2006: U.S. Control of the World:
The recently-started power load-shedding in New Delhi has been started by RAW, under instructions from the C.I.A., to provide a spurious 'reason' for pushing through the India-U.S. nuclear 'deal'; it is like RAW's sabotage of India's MiG-21 planes in past years, not to speak of India's economy and defenses in general (letters below), but this 'deal' is a life and death move by India's enemies.
As a second prong of the move to deepen and perpetuate India's slavery and in preparation for stealing the unlimited capital of my proposal about money by pumping money into the stock market (see letter dated February 26, 2005, below) while denying unlimited capital to other countries, the head of New York's Goldman Sachs has been named the new U.S. Treasury Secretary as this firm received two hundred million dollars from Mittal for Arcelor's acquisition of Mittal (Mittal did not acquire Arcelor; Mittal has a minority status in the joint company which is based in Luxembourg, where Arcelor is based and is not its chief executive). On the C.I.A.'s instructions, RAW (ONGC) entered a partnership with Mittal for joint projects in Africa, etc. and Mittal will be used for the takeover of the Indian steel and other industries-- a takeover that would have otherwise been resisted-- as a step in the military, industrial and financial control of the world.
ADDED ON JULY 1, 2006: To say that a future government will repudiate any nuclear deal this government enters into with the United States ignores that fatal injuries to and enslavement of India would have already occurred. Waiting for Parliament to convene rather than starting a mass movement now shows the same ignorance of the threat. This is like saying that, with an annihilatory nuclear first strike--or even an Iraq-like invasion of India-- by the United States on the way, we will wait for parliament to convene before deciding on our response.
In a two hour meeting, the U.S. Secretary of State persuaded the Russian Defence Minister that " it was also important to maintain control over not only materials involved in WMD [Weapons of Mass Destruction] production but also scientists working on them". This is the purpose of putting the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research and other institutions in a 'civilian' list. There is no need to argue about details; the whole 'deal' should be summarily and comprehensively rejected. There should be no 'negotiations' of any kind with the United States and this will have to be enforced upon this 'government' by all possible means.
ADDED ON MAY 25, 2006: Russian officials emphasize that their missiles can maneuver and are immune to missile defense systems. But all countries' missiles, including the United States' and India's, maneuver. The missiles cannot maneuver if they are destroyed before they take off. The United States' missile defense system is meant to stop a few missiles, not a massive attack with thousands of missiles. The spurious argument about being able to penetrate defenses is meant to justify the destruction of Russia's defenses (letters below) and the miniscule numbers of inferior strategic weapons that are being put in place and to divert attention from a decisive degradation-- a reduction in range by two thousand kilometers-- in the capability of the new missiles compared to the ones made in Soviet times.
If Russia prints and spends an additional trillion rubles a year, over and above what it would otherwise spend, to bring its strategic forces to the level mentioned in the letter dated May 14 '06 below, it would at the same time increase its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by a trillion rubles, not counting the multiplier effect (letters below). If it prints and spends another trillion rubles a year, over and above what it would otherwise spend, on constructing and giving free housing to the people, it would increase its GDP by another trillion rubles at the same time as it spends the money plus the multiplier effect (which occurs over time). If it prints and spends another trillion rubles per year, over and above what it would otherwise spend, on contructing and giving free transportation for the people, it would increase the GDP by another trillion rubles plus the multiplier effect. But the money must be spent on the production of additional missiles, housing and transportation, etc., which can then be given to the people, not the money itself. Money, besides violence and threat of violence (though who has the money is mainly a result of violence or threat of violence), is the principal way people control and exploit each other and this is why unlimited capital such as above is unacceptable to people but the Russian people, with a utopian orientation and history, can implement it.
The wealth of a nation is in the goods and services available to the people, not in the rubles or rupees or dollars the government and people hold; you cannot eat or wear or ride in money itself. Printing rubles, rupees or dollars is a means of mobilizing the productive capacity of the people.
ADDED ON MAY 14, 2006: Russia's top general says his aim is to avoid World War III. A successful United States preemptive nuclear strike, as I have been saying which the recent article in Foreign Affairs repeated, is now within the United States' reach and such a strike will not constitute World War III. Russia needs a minimum of ten thousand strategic nuclear warheads and a minimum of one hundred nuclear-armed submarines and should reach these numbers on a war footing. Russian presidents and intelligence agencies are full-fledged agents of the C.I.A. against Russia but many others have had their brains turn into Jell-O by American bribes.
Indians stupidly 'explain' their rule by a handful of the British (India's stupid prime minister, in this age of intercontinental ballistic missiles, says 'we do not want another nuclear power in our neighborhood'; was Britain India's neighbor?) by saying the latter used 'divide and rule' (why did you let them divide you?). Sucking up to the powerful, Iran's president wrote to the American president, referring to Saddam Hussein as a " murderous dictator" (how many times more than Hussein has Bush murdered?) and referring to "monotheism"; the New York Times prominently put the "monotheism" letter at the top of its home page and instantly India's RAW, as a branch of the C.I.A., moved to divide India from Iran and its Foreign Secretary justified it by saying "It would also be in tune with the latest U.S. strategic thinking for the (Central Asian) region" as the editor of a communist party organ, intimately involved with the C.I.A.'s day-to-day activities in India, not to speak of other politicians and India's C.I.A.-controlled press keep the population in tune as well. Encouraged by the success of the "monotheism" ploy, the C.I.A./RAW's next move is "The government's move to accord minority status to the Jain community [which] could have a snowball effect", to divide Hindu sects. To promote American control, investment targets, such as by the power ministry, are now specified in dollar terms.
Is the so-called 'disintegration' of the Soviet Union anything more than American 'divide and rule'?
West Bengal's communist chief minister says he needs 'capital'. What does my proposal about money (letters below) provide if not unlimited capital? He said several years ago he is always searching for what Chomsky (see letter dated April 28 '06, below) has said "about this or that". Does he know what Satish Chandra has said about this and that?
Date: April 28, 2006
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-282-4996 FAX: 617-825-4943
E-Mail: satchandra24@hotmail.com (E-Mail may not reach me; please use the telephone.)
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
Regarding the case of a novel by an Indian sophomore at Harvard: a graduate student from the Indian subcontinent at Boston's Northeastern University was accused of plagiarism because the quality of English in assigned work she turned in for a course was incomparably superior to anything she was capable of writing and, to prove this, she was required to answer the same questions in the presence of a faculty member. She wrote about thirty pages in perhaps two hours which exactly reproduced what she had earlier turned in. The faculty member alleged she had copied from papers she had with her. In her rebuttal, the student wrote this faculty member was watching her like the proverbial "hawk" throughout this session and her charge of copying was a "damnable lie". She explained, in her rebuttal and to her faculty adviser, that she had "memorized" what she reproduced in the presence of the faculty member. The lying faculty member was obliged to leave the university.
The Harvard sophomore, an Indian-American, says (New York Times, April 27 '06, Internet) she had read the books from which she is alleged to have plagiarized three or four times, that she has a “photographic memory” and had last read the books some time before she wrote her own book. Psychologist B. F. Skinner, whose plagiarism I exposed (see letter dated February 26 '05 below), upon which he was awarded an honorary doctorate by Harvard and I was mugged in a Harvard seminar (see letter dated May 11 '05 below), wrote in his 'Notebooks' that the practice, several thousands of years old and still continuing, of Brahmin priests memorizing entire books (such as the Vedas) may have had a (genetically) "selective effect" endowing them with superior memory (and other cognitive abilities). Memorization of very long texts is still the standard way students learn, at all levels, in the Indian subcontinent and the practice is not limited to Brahmin priests (the Northeastern University student was Muslim). Such ability, commonplace to Indians, is astonishing to Americans. The Harvard sophomore, of Indian origin with near perfect SAT scores, can be expected to have genetically superior memory and her explanation of how she came to reproduce portions of books she had read is believable. This does not mean that she did not intentionally plagiarize, just that her explanation is credible.
Skinner, author of ‘Verbal Behavior’, describes playing the “sedulous ape” to established authors as a way budding authors learn. Examples of similarities between the Harvard sophomore’s novel and the novels she read (Boston Globe, April 25 ‘06, Internet) would have fit this description if the similarities were intentional. The similarities could be unconscious yet intentional (there are unconscious intentions). But they could have been both unconscious and unintentional, because of the way a person’s verbal repertoire is formed. Skinner’s own plagiarism was infinitely more serious (see my paper in BEHAVIORISM, Spring, 1976). Skinner was voted by American psychology department chairpersons as the most influential living psychologist and, along with Sigmund Freud, one of the two most influential psychologists of all time. A survey showed that his world-wide reputation exceeded the combined reputation of the thirty or so Nobel prize winners in the Boston area. It was based on his position of ‘radical behaviorism’ which he defined in terms of his opposition to what he called ‘mentalism’ and Freud, of course, is the great mentalist. For his position to be viable, he had to provide an account of the so-called ‘higher mental processes’ such as language, which he did in ‘Verbal Behavior’. By showing that his account of language was simply a refinement of the work of Freud, my paper in BEHAVIORISM eliminated any basic distinction between his position and Freud’s and the basis for his claim to being a great and original thinker. In a question and answer session with thousands of his followers who packed the grand ballroom of the Hilton hotel in Chicago in May, 1977, he was very angrily denounced by his own followers, such as by one who stood up, livid with rage, shouting, referring to my paper and its implications (“SATISH CHANDRA HAS SHOWN..…”), for the fraud he had perpetrated on them and the world; his world-wide reputation and appearance on TIME magazine’s cover, etc., were due to the fundamental importance of the basic nature of human beings, for prescriptions on how they should live and be educated and governed, issues of freedom, etc., of whether they are machines or have a mind or soul and how they function. Skinner acknowledged “similarities” between him and Freud shown by “Chandra” in “BEHAVIORISM”, but had no response beyond first emphatically and aggressively saying “Or Jesus Christ! Or B. F. Skinner!” in the same breath, then minimizing the importance of such matters by appealing to the general state of ethics and what is acceptable in academia with a light-hearted “what--Miller wrote it, Gallanter takes credit for it, Pribram believes it!” (these were co-authors of a book in cognitive psychology). Upto then, Skinner had had his critics such as Chomsky of M.I.T. but had, correctly, maintained that Chomsky’s review of ‘Verbal Behavior’ was based on very poor scholarship and a misunderstanding of his position. He could not say that about my paper in BEHAVIORISM, the principal vehicle for theoretical work in radical behaviorism, whose editor called me with profound emotion about a day after he received it and wrote to me “Heartiest congratulations on what I regard to be a major contribution to work in the field”. From Germany alone, more than two dozen psychologists wrote me requesting reprints, besides every behaviorist in the United States. That paper was effective in a way that Chomsky’s was not and killed behaviorism ( the journal’s name has been changed to ‘Behavior and Philosophy’). Skinner himself wrote to me (see excerpts from his letter on my web page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eboard.com ) about that paper, before the above session with his followers, “…want to tell you, while the spell is on me, how much I admire what you have done…You have made a much more courageous use of the autoclitic and the atomic operant than I did, with breath-taking results….Seldom have I read a paper that seemed to me to contain so much that was new and forward-moving….”, etc. But after the above session with his followers, his behavior was very different (see the letter sequence below).
Verbal behavior is a far more complicated matter than either Skinner or Freud (or cognitive psychology) provide for. For example, person A can show induction from person B’s verbal behavior without ever coming into contact (as conventionally understood) with person B’s verbal behavior. The Harvard sophomore, though, had repeated, extended contact with the other author’s books. In an example (Boston Globe, April 24 ‘06, Internet) both authors refer to “170 specialty stores”. This puts a question mark on intentional plagiarizing, because an intentional plagiarizer would have changed the number to something other than 170.
Satish Chandra
ADDED ON MARCH 30, 2006: (The article below is followed by a letter sequence from January 5, 2004 to March 23, 2006).
Search for a Theory of the Firm
By Satish Chandra
To answer the question as to whether the search for a theory of the firm has been a successful one, we will review and critique some of the major theories: the theories of Coase (1937), Williamson (1981), Penrose (1959), Lazonick (2002) and Ietto-Gillies( 2005).
Coase
Coase(1937) makes the point that "...the distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechanism" (p. 389). For example, "If a workman moves from department Y to department X, he does not go because of a change in relative prices but because he is ordered to do so" (p. 387). In a caveman society, exchanges may be determined by who wields the bigger club. If prices are associated with goods and services, the prices may be products of the relative size of the clubs. It is not always violence that may govern prices; assigning prices in hundreds or thousands of dollars to torn, worn out, dirty jeans is a result of other irrational factors and in no way maximizes the good either of individuals or society. The analysis of the firm shows up the mistake of giving price the central place in economic analysis in general. An appeal to "subjective utility" does not change this because utility is determined by, for example, association with the rich and powerful, that is, dominance. An ideological insistence on the superiority of 'market economies' is nothing more than an insistence on the supremacy of those who have the bigger nuclear arsenals and greater willingness to use them.
Domination or control over others as a biological feature of human behavior is the principal reason for the existence of firms. This is recognized by Coase with his reference to "master and servant " (p. 403) realtions in "what constitutes a firm" (p. 403).
The description of the economic system by Salter, given by Coase (p. 387) is that of a market economy, which is not the only kind of economy. It gives a central place to the price mechanism. In the Soviet system, goods and services were often rationed by the government and prices were less important. In economic theory, "resources are allocated by means of the price mechanism" (p. 389). This is obviously not so, for example, in war time when government orders allocations.
"Marshall introduces organisation as a fourth factor of production " (p. 388). A command economy (as in the Soviet Union) has organization but not the price mechanism. Elements of a 'command economy' exist in all economic systems. In a feudal system, such as Britain has had, there are elements of 'command' in the economic system. Treating organization as a factor of production does not contribute to scientific analysis because organization cannot be assigned a price as other factors of production can be.
Coase refers to various causes for the emergence of firms such as minimization of contract costs (p. 391-392) and marketing costs, uncertainty (p. 392), "division of labor" (p. 398), as well as domination or "control" (p. 390) of others. A caveman's family was also a firm and did not require uncertainty to emerge. The biological human propensity to dominate is enough to explain the emergence of firms. Theories of group-formation (such as Freud's), leadership and affiliation appealing to biological and learned factors are also relevant. If the minimizing of contract costs and marketing costs were important reasons for the emergence of firms, the entire economic system would congeal into a command economy. Coase recognizes this by asking "Why is not all production carried on by one big firm?" (p. 394).
All economic analysis appeals to theories of behavior. According to Coase (p. 387), individuals "exercise foresight, and choose between alternatives". These theories are often highly questionable. A firm is a dictatorship (command economy) and a government-like structure. Therefore analytical tools from political science, which is another behavioral science like economics, are relevant. Political analysis itself is often based on faulty theories of behavior; Kissinger's theory of deterrence, for example, is dangerously misleading and worse than worthless. The reason better theories of behavior are not used in economic or political analysis is the division of academia into departments of economics, political science, psychology, etc. Any insistence on the use of better theories of behavior in economic analysis is considered "professional imperialism". Such 'political' factors also operate in the emergence and functioning of firms. The separation of 'medical' firms (medical practices) from 'dental' firms (dental practices ) is based on similar factors.
Coase (p. 393) discusses determinants of the size of the firm. He considers factors such as "efficiency" (p. 394), monopoly gains (p. 394), etc. as explanations. A good example is the move by Mittal Steel, the world's largest steel producer, to acquire the world's second largest producer, Arcelor and all the political factors that have come into play which show up the irrelevance of "efficiency", etc., as explanations. Domination is a better explanation than efficiency, both in explaining the move to acquire and the resistance to acquisition. "Monopoly gain" (p. 394) refers to economic or monetary gain but other kinds of gain, which are the result of domination, are often more important. Coase says (p. 396) "...a firm will tend to be larger the less the cost of organizing", etc. All such analysis-- in terms of costs, efficience, etc.-- is faulty and misleading. Costs and efficiency play a role but a subsidiary role.
Williamson
Williamson's basic thesis is that "The modern corporation is mainly to be understood as a product of a series of organizational innovations that have had the purpose and effect of economizing on transaction costs" (p. 1537).
In our analysis of Coase, we noted that the emergence of a firm is explained by dominance as a biological feature of human behavior, not efficiency, etc. But changes of form and organization of firms could well be due to factors such as efficiency or reduction of costs.
Other factors Williamson thinks shape the modern corporation are the quest for monopoly gains and the imperatives of technology (p. 1537). The above comment applies to these factors as well.
Williamson asked "What economic purposes are served by the widespread adoption of divisionalization?" (p. 1537). This question assumes that features of organizations evolved in a Darwinian fashion because they served economic purposes. But a Darwinian theory should appeal only to survival, not efficiency or economic purposes because such factors may be overwhelmed by, for example, the need to address the demands of ethnic factions in determining survival, though allocating resources to meet the demands of factions or pressure groups may not be compatible with efficiency. Like the emphasis on price, the emphasis on efficiency leads to faulty economic analysis. Williamson says that "the origins of transaction costs must often be sought in influences and motives that lie outside the normal domain of economics (p. 1538). But if such influences and motives determine your subject matter, defining them outside the domain of economics defeats the purpose of the science.
Transaction-cost economizing is a kind of efficiency. It is empirically observed in organizations that often there are superfluous employees engaged in superfluous activities which increase transaction costs but provide employment to favored groups or pressure groups. Hence Williamson's basic thesis in explaining modern organizations must be rejected. It should also be noted that such superfluous employment may in some cases, though not always, provide other benefits to the particular firm or to society as a whole and need not be "objectionable" or "antisocial" (p. 1538).
Much of Williamson's paper is concerned with the diverse approaches of various academic specialists such as economists, organization theorists, public policy analysts and business historians (p. 1539) and their preferences as to concepts and theories. But, as has been stated above, Williamson's own thesis as to what determines the shape of the modern corporation, namely economizing on transaction costs, must be rejected.
According to Williamson, "efficiency analysis plays a relatively minor role in the studies of most organization theory specialists-- many of whom are more inclined to emphasize power. The economizing factors that are crucial to an understanding of the modern corporation are thus effectively suppressed" (p. 1539). The analysis of Coase showed the primacy of dominance, that is power and it is argued above that an appeal to efficiency is misguided.
In discussing the approach of public policy analysts, Williamson refers to "ingrained public policy animosity towards ...conglomerate organization" and their "fanciful "distortions" at the expense of a more basic understanding of the modern corporation in economizing terms" (p. 1540). But his basic premise, about the superiority of an efficiency or economizing analysis, is invalid.
As was said in the analysis of Coase, Williamson also relies on a theory of behavior, and his "two behavioral assumptions on which transaction-cost analysis relies.. are bounded rationality and opportunism" (p. 1545). These are highly questionable assumptions. "The term bounded rationality was coined by Simon" (p. 1545), a Nobel prize winner. But inferior Nobel prize winners in Economics are a dime a dozen.
Williamson seeks support for his efficiency or economizing theory of corporations by considering the evolution of railroads (p. 1551--). But his selection and organization of facts is governed by the theory he is trying to support. This is a fact about human thought processes and cannot be otherwise. The search for empirical support for the efficiency theory is thus a self-fulfilling enterprise.
Williamson considers multidivisional (or M-form) and unitary (or U-form) corporations (p. 1555) and the shortcomings of the latter form. There are many advantages of the M-form but to say that it "served both to economize on bounded rationality and attenuate opportunism" (p. 1556) is unnecessary. The conglomerate form of organization (p. 1557) and the multinational enterprise (p. 1560) are discussed by Williamson and found to be compatible with his efficiency theory because there is an "efficiency incentive to shift from the earlier U-form to the M-form structure" (p. 1565) and such organizations tend to me M-form.
"The view that the corporation is first and foremost an efficiency instrument" (p. 1564) is supported neither by theory nor observation. But it is a view of which Williamson is deeply enamored.
Penrose
Penrose divides inducements for the expansion of a firm into two categories: those which lie in the external world outside the firm and those that are within the firm. External inducements include growth in demand for existing products or reductions in demand against which it could protect itself by expanding in new directions, exploitation of new technologies, dicoveries and inventions and opportunities to improve market position or monopolistic gains (p. 65). Internal inducements to expand are the existence of unused productive resources.There are also both external and internal obstacles to expansion such as competition, patent rights, costs of entry into new areas and limitations of managerial capacity and technical skills available in the firm.
Coases's discussion of what determines the size of a firm includes all of the above factors, though in less detail. Penrose emphasizes that "there will always be unused productive services within a firm" (p. 66) and makes this point her central thesis. This is a point that goes beyond Coase.
Penrose makes a distinction between "resources", which include physical things the firm buys, leases or produces for its own use and the people it hires and "services" which are the contributions these resources can make to the productive operations of a firm. A resource, according to her, is "a bundle of possible services" (p. 67).
According to Penrose, a firm's expansion involves a more profitable or fuller use of the services of its resources and the existence of unused services in an incentive to expand.
This is a misleading point because resources can be acquired and disposed of. Coase's discussion of the determinants of the size of a firm considers motivations of decision makers' behavior such as monopoly gain which all can be reduced to the human propensity to dominate and that is a more basic explanation.
Having made what is at best a trivial, though actually misleading, point, Penrose devotes the rest of the chapter to elaborating upon it.
Penrose asserts (p. 68) that a firm never reaches an "equilibrium position" in which there is no further incentive to expand and explains this as being due to the fact that unused services are always available. A better explanation is domination as an ever present biological feature of human behavior. Penrose provides a spurious and spuriously 'rational' explanation for the phenomenon of a firm's expansion.
If, according to Penrose, a firm expands to more fully utilize the "services" available to it, Penrose's discussion of this trivial and misleading point exemplifies the principle that a chapter expands to fill the space available to Penrose.
Penrose illustrated her theory of the growth of the firm with the Hercules case study. But her theory of the growth of a firm is so trivial that any instance of growth of any firm will automatically illustrate her theory.
The triviality of Penrose's theory is obscured by a thicket of detail. The function of any science is to enable us to deal with the subject matter more economically and conveniently. Penrose fails miserably by these criteria as well.
Lazonick
Lazonick starts with an homage to Penrose(1959), then refers to 'opportunism' (the behavioural assumption) and 'bounded rationality' (the cognitive assumption) "and says it is 'human nature as we know it'... not monopoly, that accounts for the absence of perfect markets" (p. 250). The use of a good theory of human nature is necessary for economic analysis to succeed and this is where all economic theories fail, in varying degrees, including the behavioural assumption and cognitive assumption above. The failure of Penrose (1959) is a failure to use good logic or analysis rather than a failure to use a good theory of human nature, but other theorists fail on the latter count. Lazonick is mainly concerned with evaluating the work of Penrose (1959) and, like other economists, fails to recognize the principal flaws in Penrose's work. Lazonick, like other economists, frequently uses the expression "Penrosean theory", as physicists might refer to "Newtonian physics", indicating the high status Penrose enjoys in the profession. In view of the triviality of her work, pointed out above, this is a sad commentary on the state of economic analysis.
Lazonick regards Penrose's theory to be a product of the particular historical period in which she was working. To the question "Is an abstract, ahistorical theory of the MNC possible?", one might respond, 'Is a theory that applies only to a particular historical period worth being designated a "theory"?' Lazonick (p. 275) refers to "Penrose (1989, p. 11) [having] concluded that 'universal truths without reference to time and space are unlikely to characterize economic affairs'. " Newton's laws utilize time and space but Newtonian Physics is not limited, in its applicability, to a particular time and space. There is no reason why it should be different in economic affairs.
Itteo-Gillies
Itteo-Gillies starts by saying that "The theory presented in this chapter is built on several assumptions one of which is that the transnational companies operate in industries characterized by oligopolistic structures" (p. 163). This is a proposition that needs to be justified and explained. It is not at all obvious why this should be so and using it as an 'assumption' underlying a theory seriously vitiates the validity and usefulness of the theory.
The author refers to the "assumption that producing abroad is more costly and disadvantageous compared with producing in domestic locations" (p. 164). By now it is generally understood that American firms carry out production in countries such as China and India to take advantage of lower labor costs. Also, producing in other countries can facilitate marketing of a firm's products in those countries. This is as much due to political factors-- such as providing employment to the local population, which lowers political resistance to foreign ownership of productive entities on the part of governments and people-- as for economic reasons of cost, efficiency, etc. This is seen, for example, in Japanese car manufacturers setting up plants in the United States even though producing in Japan and shipping the finished products to the United States might be better by purely economic criteria. When the British ruled India, they set up ordnance factories in India at least in part to ensure that arms and ammunition, needed to rule India, would be available locally and not depend on long and risky supply lines. Do we need a 'theory' of such international production separate from a theory of empire? Do we need a theory of empire separate from a theory of human behavior of which domination over others is a biological feature? The economists' search of theories of phenomena such as international production is really a search for explanations in terms of characteristically 'economic' variables, such as cost, efficiency, profit-maximization, etc. Often the advantages as to cost, efficiency and profits are the results, not the cause, of international production and the dominance-submission relations between groups of people (such as nations) of which international production is a part. Explanation of international production in terms of cost, efficiency, etc., then becomes a rationalization rather than a true explanation, because the cost advantages are the products of domination, not a pre-existing cause of international production.
The concept of 'nation states' plays an important role in the author's theory of international production. But the formal apparatus of nation states-- national governments, national armies, national legislatures and laws, nationally-determined domestic and foreign policies-- is often a facade that hides the true state of affairs which is colonial rule by a few countries that dictate, overtly and covertly, the structure and functions of governments and 'civil society' and domestic and foreign policies-- including policies as to foreign firms and international production and regulatory regimes--of many of these 'nation states'. This is obvious in the case of puppet regimes such as the one being set up in Iraq and the one that has been set up in Afghanistan. But it is also true of many mighty 'nation states' generally regarded as independent, such as India, which are ruled covertly by foreign intelligence agencies exactly as they were ruled overtly before they gained formal 'independence' and set up the apparatus of nation states. This has been true of Russia for over a decade. Analyses of international production fail to take account of such all-important facts and are, therefore, highly misleading and worse than worthless.
Has the Search for a Theory of the Firm Been Successful?
Having reviewed the above theories, one can now address the question as to whether the search for a theory of the MNC has been a successful one. Underlying this question is the assumption that a separate theory of the firm, apart from theories of group formation in general, such as those that are part of social psychology, anthropology and behavior science in general, is needed. The search for a theory of the firm by economists is really a search for a theory of the firm in terms of variables-- efficiency, various kinds of economic gain, maximization of utility, etc.-- that are favored by economists. The division of academia into departments of economics, sociology, anthropology, psychology, etc., has led to such a parochial approach to the subject matter. There is no harm in a multiplicity of approaches to theory-formation but the assumption that, because a firm is an economic actor, its emergence, expansion and various features are determined by economic factors is faulty. According to behavior science, a person's choice of a mate is often influenced by resemblance to a parent. How about the choice of a profession or line of work? It is granted that such choices are also influenced by the line of work of parents or other family members, significant individuals in a person's life and various features, accidental or otherwise, of the person's physical and social environment. How about decisions about whether to expand or the direction in which to expand, if the person is the owner or chief executive officer of a firm? Economists assume that such decisions are 'rational' under some, usually economic, criteria even if the rationality is "bounded", per Herbert Simon, as was mentioned in the discussion of Coase above. It was also said above that this an unjustified assumption, though it is universal in economic analysis in general and is a fatal flaw in theories of economic behavior of various kinds. Apart from this unjustified assumption in the work of economists, it is seen that their approach to theory formation is fatally flawed, as was said about Penrose's work above. In particular, they suffer from the infirmity of looking for variables that will support their preconceived theory (another theorist with a different preconceived theory will look for a different set of independent variables that will be equally successful in predicting the dependent variable) and the relationships they assert are self-fulfilling. This is a criticism that applies to economic theories in general-- neoclassical or otherwise-- and applies to theories of the firm as well. One can go beyond the question as to whether the search for a theory of the firm has been successful and ask whether Economics as a science has been successful and the answer must be 'No'. This applies even to purely empirical approaches, as in Econometric models, underlying which are highly misleading assumptions-- even if we confine ourselves to purely 'economic' variables such as production, efficiency, etc. A science must enable us to not just predict but control. By making better use of a science of behavior, both prediction and control of economic behavior can be greatly improved. This applies as much to the analysis of the firm as to analysis of the economic behavior of individuals. The individualist assumption of neoclassical theory is on the right track but the theorists, without exception, have failed to use a good theory of individual behavior. Theorists such as Coase and Williamson share the individualist assumption of neoclassical theory as must any theory that treats the individual ( calling the individual a 'decision maker' itself takes an unduly narrow view of an individual actor) as the principal actor. Dividing economic theories with labels such as 'neoclassical' does not serve any useful purpose; instead, theorists should simply focus on making use of better theories of human behavior. In making use of transaction costs, uncertainty and the maximization of self-interest, theorists--whether or not they are labeled 'neoclassical'-- have fallen into two major pitfalls: the assumption of 'rationality' as a factor governing human behavior and the assumption that economic behavior is mainly governed by characteristically 'economic' variables. This has led to an undue emphasis on price, costs, efficiency, etc. The example of prices in hundreds or thousands of dollars being assigned to old, torn, dirty jeans in the discussion of Coase above showed that price is a dependent variable governed by irrational factors that govern economic behavior in general that economic theorists of all kinds have failed to consider. It is recognized that the behavior of individuals and groups is shaped by their experiences, that is to say, their history (a specific history-- formulated in terms of conditioning or other theories of behavior--is responsible for the prices assigned to old, torn, dirty jeans in the example above) but a theory should not be limited to a specific history; it should be able to explain different kinds of individual and group behavior patterns that result from different histories. Only such a theory can be called adequate in a science.
R. H. Coase, "The Nature of the Firm", Economica, 4 (1937), pp. 386-405.
Oliver Williamson, "The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes," Journal of Economic Literature, 19, no. 4 (1981), pp. 1537-68.
Edith T. Penrose, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1959), pp. 65-87.
W. Lazonick, "The U.S. Industrial Corporation and The Theory of the Growth of the Firm", pp. 249-277, in Pitelis, ed., The Growth of the Firm.
Grazia Ietto-Gillies, "Nation States and TNCs' Strategic Behavior", in Ietto-Gillies, Transnational Corporations and International Production: Concepts, Theories and Effects (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005, Chapter 15, pp. 163-179).
Date: May 11, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-282-4996 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra24@hotmail.com (E-Mail may not reach me; please use the telephone.)
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page and communications--E-Mail, faxes, regular mail-- to and from me are often blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
A headline says "American multi-media empire to expand its presence in Russia". More than "infrastructure facilities, defense enterprises, natural monopolies, and the development of strategic natural resources", countries need to guard their information sources. Information sources can make you see white as black and black as white (see, for example, my letter dated April 25, 2005, below, pointing out that the Soviet system was far more equal and, therefore, far more democratic). More than mad cow disease, countries need to protect their citizens from debilitation and death via information sources. It is information imperialism (formal education is part of information sources) that keeps India in the most abject slavery (see letter dated January 5 '04, below); it was to maintain information imperialism that India's greatest scientist, whose work was in the mainstream of Western science, was publicly tortured in a Harvard seminar and it is information imperialism that has kept India's puppet government, media (I have described over the years some of the huge operation of carrots and sticks by which India's Research and Analysis Wing has kept Indian media from reporting on him, on the C.I.A.'s orders) and citizenry participating to the hilt in crimes against him for the past 28 years (see letter dated February 26, 2005, below). It is surrender to the information imperialism of the West (which started with a refusal by TASS in New York to report on the persecution-- whose nature and extent is unprecedented in the history of mankind--of the above Indian scientist) that is responsible for Soviet/Russian self-destruction over the past 20 years which will continue at an accelerating pace under current plans. It is information imperialism that keeps countries of the world from taking advantage of my proposal about money (see letters below).
An example of information imperialism and India's continued slavery is a news item in the Indian press today about a statement of India's prime minister on the way back from the May 9 celebration in Moscow in which he celebrates the two million Indians who fought in World War II and tens of thousands who died. In fact, both in World War I and II, millions of Indians fought whoever and wherever their British colonial masters wanted them to and not a single one of them fought their British colonial masters who had enslaved them. Pakistan's legislature has protested a cartoon in an American newspaper showing Pakistan as a dog loyal to Washington. But India is equally a dog loyal to the white master. Russia is half way to becoming a dog loyal to Washington.
The end result of the process for Russia will not be membership in a club of nations of the Master Race as some say ("Russia seeks to be part of "Greater Europe"-- Lavrov") and it will not be an intact Russia, only with a 'market' economy, etc. It will be oblivion (see my letters dated April 8 and 19, 2005, below) because the process is, in essence, suicidal.
The Russian press has referred to the United States' intention to destabilize Central Asia. In a letter to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1982 I pointed to a Washington Post report quoting an American "diplomat" in New Delhi talking about the feasibility of accomplishing India's break-up. Destabilizing and intervening is standard American procedure. Russia's foreign minister has never lost an opportunity to emphasize the United States' right to have military bases and 'influence' in the former Soviet republics. A head of state who embraces and encourages a mortal enemy of his country is guilty of treason as well as stupidity. The heads of the KGB and the Defense Ministry tried to do something about it in 1991 (on American television I saw George Bush Sr.-- who, when vice president, had a meeting with Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in her kitchen to arrange the murder of her son via plane crash for which the C.I.A. director openly and immediately claimed credit in a letter to the National Review, as I have described in letters to the press-- in his pajamas taking a call from Gorbachev like a parent from a teenager in trouble). The present defense minister and head of the FSB have spoken up occasionally. It remains to be seen if they will act effectively. The Russian legislature can adopt a measure nullifying the dissolution of the Soviet Union and giving the government the right to take any steps it deems necessary at times of its choosing.
The Russian legislature will do well to adopt a measure nullifying the dissolution of the Soviet Union without waiting for another part of the government to act, because the C.I.A. trains politicians and others who are its 'assets' in the skillful use of misleading statements to keep 'stringing others along' (see letter dated May 3, 2005, below, about intermittent reinforcement with conditioned stimuli, etc.). To take an example, in 1996-97, as I pointed out in a letter to the press, Vajpayee had arranged for a small explosion to be set off near the British School in New Delhi, run by Britain's embassy, which caused no damage or injuries but which gained him credit with his followers for a 'nationalist' stance against English-medium schools. A little act like that can keep his followers fooled and enable him to 'string them along' for at least a half dozen years.
ADDED ON JULY 4, 2005: On June 20 '05, The Hindu (Internet edition) reported "Subramanian Swamy has called upon Hindus to unite to defeat the "attempts by a powerful external force" to foment trouble and split India./ Foreign forces were engaged in these attempts in order to prevent India from becoming a developed country, he said". Two days later, on June 22 '05, The Hindu (Internet edition) reported that a Harvard University release says that Swamy was flying that day to Harvard to teach a course on the economic development of India; apparently this was arranged to 'neutralise' my influence seen in his statement of June 20 '05. Do you think he will teach in this course that "a powerful external force" (the United States) is trying to "prevent India from becoming a developed country"? A little earlier, an honorary doctorate to Manmohan Singh from Oxford University was announced to the same end, to keep India in the fold of their information imperialism.
These are two examples of hundreds of such acts (Swamy was brought to Harvard in 1977 also, along with Jethmalani, when I was publicly tortured in a Harvard seminar) over the years of maintaining their imperialism by rewarding/bribing the mediocre ( such as the award of a Nobel prize in Economics to another mediocre Indian, arranged via Jethmalani when he was a Cabinet minister, who was brought from Oxford to Harvard).
ADDED ON JULY 8, 2005: The C.I.A. was behind the bombings in London yesterday, as it was behind the terrorist act at the temple in Ayodhya, India, two days earlier; the London bombings were carried out, with the advance knowledge of the Russian president, to provide an excuse to not insist on the removal of American bases from Central Asia (ostensibly there to fight "terrorism" just as the unilateral nuclear disarmament of Russia -- under which Russian nuclear warheads are dismantled and their highly enriched uranium is diluted and shipped to the United States while the United States simply puts its warheads in storage from where they can be redeployed-- is being carried out under the pretext of guarding against terrorism, with the cooperation of the C.I.A.'s Russian 'assets') that the Shanghai Cooperation Organization just demanded; the Ayodhya terrorist act, which Vajpayee has called a "conspiracy" though he himself was part of the conspiracy, was committed (through India's Research and Analysis Wing which has committed almost all of the terrorist acts in India over the past 23 years or so, as I have shown in letters to the press over the years) one day before reinstating Ayodhya temple-related criminal charges against Advani because the latter had broken with C.I.A.-asset Vajpayee, as he has unsuccessfully done several times in the past, after my reference above to Vajpayee arranging an explosion near the British School in New Delhi to keep his followers fooled, etc., by going to Pakistan and saying certain things in a show of independence from Vajpayee. Both terrorist acts--in London and in Ayodhya-- were carried out in support of C.I.A. 'assets', one in Russia, the other in India, for the maintenance of American imperialism over these two countries.
ADDED ON JULY 21, 2005: The July 21, 2005 London explosions, which were similar to the July 7, 2005 London explosions (four explosions-- three in subways, one in a bus-- with identical back packs and explosives on both days) but caused practically no damage or injuries, were designed by C.I.A. psychologists to reduce, by 'association', the negative effect toward Americans of the July 7 '05 London explosions on whose American sponsorship I had blown the whistle (addendum dated July 8 '05, above). The more recent events of July 21 '05, which had no serious consequences, and the reactions to them, sort of 'over-write' the reactions to the earlier events of July 7 '05.
ADDED ON JULY 23, 2005: A thorough and ringing repudiation of the 'agreement' in the nuclear field just made in Washington is imperative if India is to have any chance of survival. India designs and builds its own nuclear reactors and the emphasis should be on enhancing indigenously developed capabilities; giving up independence in the nuclear field is the same as giving away India's future. The Research and Analysis Wing, which functions as a branch of the C.I.A., slipped it through on orders of its foreign masters. Like the unilateral nuclear disarmament of Russia (Addendum dated July 8 '05 above), this is no ordinary sabotage but a fatal blow.
ADDED ON JULY 29, 2005: Manmohan Singh keeps saying that, in the nuclear deal with the United States, India will do its part only if the United States does its part-- but it is precisely if the United States does its part that the deal will do the most damage to India. What the United States is required to do under the deal is to supply to India-- and let other countries supply to India-- nuclear technology and fuel which will make India dependent on foreign technology and fuel in this critical field when India has its own technology that will eventually fuel its nuclear program from the abundant Thorium available within the country. Manmohan Singh's defence of the deal amounts to saying we will lick the United States' boots if it will kick us in the face and we will not do our part (lick its boots) if the United States does not do its part (kick us in the face). This is the kind of unbelievable stupidity that allowed a handful of the British to rule India for centuries.
India produces almost four hundred thousand engineers per year, more than five times as many as the United States, which produces about seventy thousand. There is no good reason-- except sabotage by the Research and Analysis Wing which functions as a branch of the C.I.A.-- why India should have to import technology from other countries rather than the other way around (see my letter dated January 5 '04, below). RAW has successfully sabotaged technology development and economic development over the years (it has even sabotaged MiG-21 planes on behalf of the Americans of which I gave an example in a letter to the press several years ago) and now it is sabotaging the most critical area of all-- India's nuclear program-- through this deal.
ADDED ON JULY 31, 2005: Even if India was required to do absolutely nothing in return for being sold foreign nuclear technology and fuel, the foreign nuclear technology and fuel are deadly poison for India's nuclear program (see Addendum dated July 29 '05 above) and should be shunned like poison. When you look at what the deal requires India to do in return for being sold the deadly poison of unneeded and unwanted foreign nuclear technology and fuel, it requires India to shoot itself in the head. The nonsense about 'minimal nuclear deterrence' is seen in the recolonisation of Pakistan, which has a 'minimal nuclear deterrent', by the United States. The United States is able and willing to wipe India off the face of the Earth in a matter of minutes with thousands of nuclear warheads. What deterrent-- minimal or otherwise-- does India have against this? How many nuclear warheads can India launch against the United States, with what delivery vehicles (in order to 'deter', such capabilities have to be public knowledge)? To survive, India has to have an even greater ability to wipe the United States off the face of the Earth and an even greater willingness to do so. With four times the manpower and five times the engineering manpower production compared to the United States, India can do that but for the traitors who rule India.
ADDED ON AUGUST 2, 2005: A report (in The Hindu, August 2 '05, Internet Edition) refers to someone stealing sensitive information from the Navy war room and says "authorities were working in close cooperation with security agencies to ascertain the motive for downloading the information". India's nuclear deterrent against the United States consists of nuclear-armed submarines. The information was most likely stolen by the Research and Analysis Wing, which functions as a branch of the C.I.A., to give to the Americans intelligence on the movement and deployment of these submarines after I asked (Addendum dated July 31 '05 above) 'how many nuclear warheads can India launch against the United States, with what delivery vehicles'. The Research and Analysis Wing is the most comprehensive enemy of India-- in economic, military and other fields-- and represents India's imperialist enemies within India. It must be totally destroyed. It is a mammoth organisation with just the number of joint secretaries in the hundreds. At least its top 1,000 officers should be arrested and executed. A brand new external intelligence agency can be formed with the help of military intelligence.
After the first Gulf War, I pointed out, in a letter that appeared in the Times of India, Delhi, that the threat of the use of nuclear weapons by the United States had prevented Iraq from using even the conventional weapons it did have. After this, the then chief of India's army staff reportedly said "Never fight the United States without nuclear weapons". At this, he was brought to the United States to be 'neutralised'. After I pointed out (Addenda dated July 8 and 21 '05, above) that the C.I.A. carried out the London blasts of July 7 '05 to provide an excuse for the Russian president to not insist on the removal of American bases from Central Asia, numerous steps were taken by the Russian president, in close coordination with the Americans, such as the Collective Security Treaty Organization, of which Russia is a member, issuing a statement "U.S. bases should stay in Central Asia", to neutralise the demand of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, at the same time that the U.S. Secretary of Defense visited Central Asia to affirm that U.S. bases in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan will stay there. Some steps, such as "Russian Armed Forces General Staff chief leaves for U.S.", were directed against the possibility of a coup against a head of state engaged in the pell-mell destruction of his country in cooperation with the C.I.A.
The India - U.S. nuclear proposal is such a threat that the armed forces ought to take matters in their own hands, remove this government and, if necessary, declare martial law.
ADDED ON AUGUST 4, 2005: The India-U.S. nuclear proposal on the American side requires concurrence of the U.S. Congress. On the Indian side, resolutions can be passed by both houses of Parliament expressing disapproval of the proposal and enjoining the government not to proceed with its implementation. I am surprised this has not already been done. Also, a new law covering the nuclear area or a modification of an existing law can be passed prohibiting IAEA inspections of any facilities not already subject to such inspections, the import of nuclear technology and fuel (except for a facility-- Tarapur-- already receiving such fuel), etc. A lot more can and should be done but this will be a good start.
An example of other steps will be imposing trade and other sanctions on imperialist countries invading or occupying other countries (with five times the production of engineering manpower compared to the United States and with my proposal about money-- see letters below-- India need not import ANYTHING from the United States or export anything to it), giving military and other aid to the brave people of Iraq fighting imperialist aggression, setting a deadline for the United States to withdraw its aggression from Afghanistan-- a part of traditional India-- etc.
A law prohibiting the import of ANY military equipment from ANY country will go a long way to bringing to life an Indian defence industry.
ADDED ON AUGUST 5, 2005: The effectiveness of high-level bribery in destroying a superpower is seen in Russia. To destroy a country, its ability to defend itself has to be destroyed. This is being done in a dramatic way against Russia. The unilateral nuclear disarmament of Russia involves not just unilaterally stripping it of its nuclear warheads (Addendum dated July 8 '05, above) but also of their modes of delivery. About 200 of Russia's nuclear submarines have been scrapped; about half of them have already been dismantled, the remaining are due to be dismantled. Many of those which remain are unarmed. By 2010, Russia plans to have 10 or 12 strategic nuclear submarines-- a small fraction of the United States' fleet. Russia's early warning system against a nuclear attack has been rendered non-functional by a lack of satellites. The excuse for not maintaining Russia's defenses is a lack of money (the destruction of Russia's defenses is being carried out with American government money in billions of dollars per year) but Russia's treasury is bulging with money which its finance minister says will be invested in foreign securities (in G-8 countries), not in Russia (money invested in the defense sector grows the economy and the GDP just as money invested in other sectors). Russia's conventional as well as nuclear arsenal is being destroyed. To ensure the destruction, the task has been taken away from the Defense Ministry and given to the Industry and Energy Ministry. A list of weapons to be destroyed in a new round of destruction includes "500 intercontinental ballistic missiles, 40 strategic bombers (Russia will have a small fraction of the United States' fleet), 1000 airplanes and helicopters, 84 nuclear submarines, 30,000 antiaircraft and 5,000 cruise missiles, about 6,000 tanks and over 5 billion units of ammunition". Why don't other countries offer to buy these weapons offering twice the money Russia will get from selling the scrap metal?
ADDED ON AUGUST 7, 2005: After I pointed out (Addendum dated July 8, 2005 above) that the July 7 '05 London blasts were carried out by the C.I.A., Russia's Defense Minister said there is no area in which Russia and NATO could cooperate. The 'crisis' of the trapped Russian mini-submarine, rescued by NATO, was staged by the Americans with the Russian president to reverse that by putting the Defense Minister in a situation of accepting NATO's help. A Russian admiral has 'strongly condemned' seeking NATO's assistance in rescuing the trapped Russian mini-submarine, saying the region hosts the main base for the strategic nuclear submarines of the Russian Pacific Fleet, a secret cable runs through the area and a foreign submarine detection system is located there, too, pointing out that the "Russian Navy should have been able to rescue the AS-28 mini-sub without difficulty, using manipulators at its disposal, and blowing up the cable in which the mini-sub got caught. The admiral also expressed surprise that the Pacific Fleet command had said openly that the sub had got caught on an underwater antenna instead of "an underwater object". This antenna is one of the main components of an active system for the long-range detection of submarines".
The strategy in destroying Russia's defenses is to destroy hundreds of nuclear submarines, hundreds of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles, etc. and justify that by pointing to a couple of new generation submarines and a couple of new generation ICBMs (which in fact have a range two thousand kilometers less than the missiles being destroyed) that will be inducted in the next couple of years.
ADDED ON AUGUST 8, 2005: The 'crisis' of the Russian minisub and its rescue by NATO was also designed to coincide with a top Russian general's meeting with his U.S. counterpart in Washington for maximum effect in 'neutralising' the Russian Defense Minister's comment about cooperation between Russia and NATO. This purpose of the 'crisis' and the rescue has ruled out the option of seeking Russian help in rescuing the shuttle Discovery astronauts because getting Russian help in rescuing the astronauts will eliminate the intended effect of the rescue of the Russian minisub by NATO.
ADDED ON AUGUST 11, 2005: India's parliament has dropped the subject of the India-U.S. nuclear proposal without taking any effective action such as passing a law of the kind suggested above, prohibiting IAEA inspections of any facilities not already subject to such inspections or the import of nuclear technology and fuel except for a facility already receiving such fuel (Addendum dated August 4, 2005 above), or even passing a resolution expressing disapproval of the proposal. This issue is incomparably more important for India's future and survival than the matters the parties in parliament have been concerning themselves with.
SECOND ADDENDUM DATED AUGUST 11, 2005: In managing or growing an economy, the focus should be on productive activity, not finances because finances are essentially unlimited (see letters below). In a country like Russia, productive activity is best started and sustained by the government and interfering with that in the name of 'privatization' is a destructive act. When Russia's economic development minister says that the economy has not been able to absorb all the money that is available, that is because the government's role in starting and sustaining productive activity is being eliminated. Private initiative can be encouraged as well (see letter dated February 8, 2005, below) but that has to be only a supplement to government initiative (unless private initiative does not require getting bank loans and raising capital in the 'market' and the government truly serves as a 'dispenser of money'; in any case, private initiative is chaotic and has no advantage over government initiative). It is said that next year Russia's per capita GDP will reach the level it was at in 1993, when the economic destruction started; without the income from high oil prices, it will probably take another ten years. If there had been no switch to a 'market' economy, Russia's per capita GDP and quality of life today would probably be the highest in the world. Russia can quickly wipe out the destruction wrought in the past dozen years and be where it would have been without it by switching back to state initiative in the economic field and utilizing the limitless financial resources available to it (remembering that money is an instrument for generating productive activity; you cannot eat or wear or ride in money itself). High-level bribery by the Americans is responsible for the on-going destruction and that has to stop if Russia is to survive.
ADDED ON AUGUST 12, 2005: A couple of days ago I was looking up provisions in the Russian constitution for the impeachment of a president on the Internet. The C.I.A., which monitors everything I do, immediately proceeded to bribe an official who plays a key role in the impeachment process. That official spoke up after I sent the above addendum both against a switch back to state initiative in the economic field and against the limitless capital available to the state that I referred to.
ADDED ON AUGUST 16, 2005: The increases in Russia's budget made yesterday are simply a maneuver in Russia's on-going destruction.
ADDED ON AUGUST 20, 2005: The import of a nuclear power plant (in the face of strenuous opposition from India's Department of Atomic Energy officials who said it "would serve only to benefit the Russian nuclear industry... would harm India's autonomous nuclear program, breaking the country's control of the nuclear fuel cycle and creating unnecessary dependency", besides other objections such that "Nuclear power generation in India has not succeeded because it requires stable grids...The existing grids in the country cannot handle the output of a 1000 MW unit ...so there is no logic in going ahead with the deal", etc.) from Russia for Kudankulam, India, was meant to pave the way for larger scale imports from the United States to enable the United States to get control of India's nuclear program. India's current prime minister has been suitably bribed. I said above (Addendum dated July 29 '05) that there is no good reason why India should have to import technology from other countries rather than the other way around. India continues to import military equipment worth billions of dollars per year because of the kickbacks that politicians and officials receive which will stop if India produced its own military equipment. I called for a law prohibiting the import of any military equipment from any country (Addendum dated August 4 '05 above). The contract just signed for the import of 250 jet engines from Russia and production under license of another 1000 is meant to facilitate the import of military equipment from the United States and other countries on which politicians and officials can continue to receive kickbacks. As an agent of the C.I.A., the Russian president indirectly or directly participates in these deals to promote American interests and receives a 'cut'.
Manuel Noriega of Panama was a head of state and a C.I.A. agent when the Americans invaded his country to arrest him and brought him in chains to the United States where he is in jail. In destroying Russia, the Americans have been working for the day when they can bring the Russian president in chains to be jailed in the United States; they already have some Russian/Ukrainian Cabinet ministers ( including Russia's former minister for nuclear matters who made the deal with India for the Kudankulam nuclear plant) in jail in the United States (or in European jails awaiting transfer to U.S. jails). Why would Russia put itself in a position of taking U.S. money to destroy its nuclear arms and then allow the U.S. to jail its Cabinet ministers for not using the money properly? This is just a glimpse of what high level bribery can accomplish.
ADDED ON AUGUST 22, 2005: I have said in letters to the press over the years that almost all terrorist acts in India over the past 23 years have been carried out by India's Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. (see Addenda dated July 8 and July 21 '05 to Letter dated May 11 '05, above). The August 17 '05 blasts in Bangladesh were carried out by RAW, as Bangladesh's government has correctly said, in support of the United States' ambassador's visit to Calcutta during which he said to the communist government there that the United States would like to cooperate with them in fighting terrorism.
ADDED ON SEPTEMBER 2, 2005: It is common in India for legislators to receive 'American money'. Even if a thousand legislators and other officials receive a thousand dollars a month (which is several times their Indian salaries), it costs only a million dollars a month. They depend on American money, via their C.I.A.-supported leaders, for election expenses, etc. The same is done in Russia. The C.I.A. increasingly controls the Russian media (the placement of many C.I.A.-supplied headlines and stories on the major wire services shows hour-by-hour management of the Russian president by the C.I.A.), as it controls Indian media through the Research and Analysis Wing which functions as a branch of the C.I.A.
The coup of 1991 failed because some military units did not support it. The destruction of Russia since then by the Americans through their Russian puppet/collaborator leaders thoroughly bears out the patriotism and purposes of the coup leaders. The threat the Russians face today is greater than the threat they fought against in The Great Patriotic War. It may not be possible to prepare the public in advance for the liberation of their country from the grip of the Americans but with good preparation of the armed forces, it can be done.
ADDED ON SEPTEMBER 9, 2005: The sole purpose of Clinton's September 8 '05 visit to India was to secretly confer with C.I.A.- asset Vajpayee about future strategy following my remarks of September 2 '05, above; everything else was a smoke-screen. In particular, Clinton's visit resulted in greatly increased financial support from the C.I.A. to Vajpayee, enabling him to take an aggressive stance to assert his control over his party by greatly increasing bribes of C.I.A. money to party members. In the meantime, the American ambassador is pressing the Indian government-- which has already started giving the Americans information about India's nuclear installations, ostensibly to separate civilian from military-- for rapid and complete disclosure of all nuclear installations so the United States can target them for destruction.
ADDED ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2005: At the instigation of the C.I.A., through the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), it has been announced that India will raise 300 additional battalions, totalling 300,000 personnel, of paramilitary troops which are meant to counter any moves, civilian or military, to free India from the grip of the Americans (the Indian government is obeying the American demands to enable the United States to target Indian nuclear installations for destruction and letting the United States take control of India's nuclear program via unnecessary and harmful imports being shoved down India's throat and, as part of this, has just announced the planned import of four 1,000 MW reactors; when the Indian government showed resistance to the U.S. ambassador's demands-- addendum dated September 9 '05 above-- Bush SUMMONED Manmohan Singh to appear at his hotel at 6:45 p.m. this month and the latter capitulated). The Indian Army should demand that all paramilitary forces in the country (Border Security Force, Central Reserve Police Force, etc.) be under the direct command and supervision of the regular Army and that all Central government ministries and departments, including the Prime Minister's Office, have deputed to them officers from the Armed Forces with power to veto any decisions and direct any measures as they see fit (because India's politicians and officials are in the grip of foreign intellegence agencies) and the Armed Forces should arrest the top 1,000 or so officers of RAW (quietly if they go quietly, otherwise noisily) as a first step to the total destruction of this agency which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India.
ADDED ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2005: To show that he is in "control", the Russian president has reversed, following the addendum dated September 24 '05 above, the end to the destruction of Russia's nuclear submarines and the end to the destruction of Russia's nuclear warheads with American money that had been announced just on September 22 '05 (by the head of the Federal Agency for Nuclear Power) following my references to them. But it is the C.I.A. that is in control of Russia's continuing destruction.
The C.I.A., through Russian intelligence agencies one or more of which function as a branch of the C.I.A. (the letter dated May 11 '05 above gave undue credit to the FSB chief), also increasingly controls the Russian media which have recently carried at least ten times as many headlines containing the name of Khodorkovsky as of anyone else in Russia and, following the principle that it does not matter what the news says about you so long as you are in the news, his 'support' among Russians has already gone up from 2% to 10%, if the C.I.A. and the United States are planning to make him the future ruler of Russia.
ADDED ON OCTOBER 5, 2005: The crimes of the Americans against Russia's former Atomic Energy Minister (any Russian who used American money for his private purposes instead of the purposes of the Americans to destroy Russia was doing a patriotic and responsible thing and deserves a medal, not punishment) are simply a part of the Americans' on-going crimes against Russia of which their bribery of Russia's presidents and destruction of Russia's defenses and economy through such bribery are a part. Any American in Russia is a participant in these crimes and deserves to be arrested and jailed.
ADDED ON OCTOBER 28, 2005: There are daily reports of a lack of money and manpower (lack of manpower?? In the Indian subcontinent?? Come on!!) to deal with the aftermath of the earthquake in Kashmir. But, as I have shown (letters below), any government has an unlimited amount of money by simply printing the money, so long as it is used for productive purposes (accepting this requires stopping being a dog loyal to the white master and stopping collaboration in the suppression of the world's greatest living scientist by the Americans because of the colour of his skin). For dealing with disasters, I gave the formula (letter dated Fabruary 8, 2005, below): invite any and all individuals and organisations to 'find a need and fill it and be reimbursed at double your cost'. Insofar as daily life in the Indian subcontinent is a disaster, I said a 50% profit may be enough incentive in non-emergency situations. Of course, in both emergency and non-emergency situations, the government can organise the productive activities itself rather than wait for private parties to come forward. The point is that a shortage of money (or manpower) cannot be the excuse for not doing so.
ADDED ON OCTOBER 29, 2005: As I have shown in letters to the press over the years, almost all terrorist acts in India over the past 23 or so years have been carried out by India's Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), often through groups sponsored by it in other countries and the explosions in Delhi today are no exception. And RAW acts as a branch of the C.I.A. in carrying out these explosions as in many other acts of destruction and sabotage against India, including some train accidents such as the Gaisal train disaster which killed several hundreds, as I said at that time. As I have shown above, the recent explosions in Bangladesh and in London were sponsored by the C.I.A. and carried out via RAW (addendums dated July 8, July 21 and August 22, 2005). The same was the case with the Madrid subway explosions a couple of years ago in which one of the first suspects arrested was a Hindu Indian.
Today's explosions in Delhi and train derailment in Andhra Pradesh were carried out by RAW to show continued loyalty to the CIA and the white master (as I have shown, RAW carried out an entire war in Kargil on orders of the CIA to increase support for the government of a CIA-asset) because, in my addendum dated October 28, 2005 sent yesterday, I had said that accepting my proposal about money, with its economic, military and geopolitical consequences, requires "stopping being a dog loyal to the white master". Along with reports of today's explosions, today's Times of India, which functions as an organ of RAW, had a report about Indians' "BPO dream" (usually there are reports of Indians' 'visa dream' or 'American dream') as employees of Indian companies leave their jobs for jobs in call centers, because providing such 'coolie manpower' to white countries is the role assigned to India by the United States whose orders RAW implements. Similarly, when I wrote recently that, with five times the engineering manpower production compared to the United States, there is no good reason why India should have to import technology from other countries rather than the other way around, RAW had Manmohan Singh say in a speech that research and development activity in India can increase if foreign companies bring their R & D activities here; like the millions of Indians fighting in World Wars I and II under the white master (see letter dated May 11 '05 above), Indian scientists can only engage in research and development as coolie labour for the white master.
ADDED ON NOVEMBER 10, 2005: In 2006, the Russian armed forces will receive 6 ICBMs, 31 T-90 tanks and nine aircraft, including a Tu-160 strategic bomber. These are vanishingly small numbers which ought to be increased at least twentyfold which will also benefit the economy as a whole (government-sponsored productive activity in all sectors, printing all the money that is needed to get the production going full blast including, for example, a twentyfold increase in the production of housing to be GIVEN, not sold, to the people is the key to Russia's revival). The recent string of failures in the space program is also due to financial strangulation (sabotage by Russian intelligence agencies at least one of which functions as a branch of the C.I.A.-- see addendums dated September 2 and September 27 '05 above-- may have also been involved). The armed forces are meant to defend their country and their first task ought to be to destroy the C.I.A. agents who are destroying Russia.
ADDED ON NOVEMBER 18, 2005: Indians have been celebrating the results of their air force exercises with the Americans last year and this year, not realising that the Americans have been letting them 'win' so they will feel good about such exercises and will be more likely to participate in them in the future. A typical PTI report referred to the American commander's "pat" on the back of the Indians. A report a couple days ago had a typical headline of an American official's "praise" to India for coming to the aid of quake-stricken Pakistan. An Indian report a few months ago said a visit by a white woman to see victims of an encephalitis epidemic in U.P. was disappointing and "unsuccessful" because on reaching the hospital she found only about twenty five had died there; they should have been dying by the hundreds to make her visit 'successful'. A girl who plays tennis has become a super-star for no other reason than that her name resembles this white woman's and she plays a Western game (a headline in Indian Express said "Sania loses but is crowned queen of India"; this white woman was treated as queen of India even before she held any party or government post and all visiting heads of state were required to call on her where she lived in the prime ministerial residence even when the BJP, not her dead husband's party, formed the government). India's defence minister boasts of ten billion dollars worth of arms imports in the works from one country alone, refusing to do the research and development and India sends over 80,000 post-graduate students to the United States every year, refusing to make the effort to teach them. India's principal intelligence agency sits at C.I.A.- supplied terminals to participate in the destruction of India's and the world's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian. So they would not destroy this agency as he has said should be done, India's military brass (which had stopped saluting Vajpayee when prime minister because of this scientist's comments but a lot more than stopping saluting the prime minister needs to be done) was brought to a function at which India's prime minister gave a 'lifetime achievement award' to the man who has made it a branch of the C.I.A. Like the millions of Indians fighting in World Wars I and II under the white master, this is the reality of India, not the spurious 'win' over the American air force invading and burning brown-skinned people to the bone with phosphorus bombs to rule them as the white man still rules India.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 1, 2005: I have said that Indian companies buying Russian oil assets, etc., will be Trojan Horses for the Americans. This is even more so in the matter of India's participation in, say, the GLONASS (Global Navigation Satellite System) project. As a C.I.A. agent, the Russian president will be for India's participation in it but Russia's defence ministry should veto it.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 8, 2005: Russia's defence ministry should veto the opening of any U.S. military bases in Romania (or Poland or Bulgaria); Russia's C.I.A.-agent president will not act in this or any other matter affecting Russia's survival.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 10, 2005: One way the United States neutralises Russia's ability to defend itself against its on-going destruction by the United States is seen in a news item on a Russian wire service: "Delegation of Russian Air Force generals to visit USA:...a delegation of Long-Range Aviation generals and senior officers, led by Long-Range Aviation Commander...would arrive in the United States December 11...visit that would last through December 17... ". An item on this government-run wire service, after I referred to the bribery of Russian (and Indian) politicians by the United States, suggested that the "money option" in bringing the Russian armed forces under American control ( "Hut, two, three, four!" ) was being neglected. In a speech (written by RAW) to Indian military commanders a few weeks ago, after my reference to the vanishingly small numbers of arms to be received by the Russian armed forces, India's prime minister referred to "non-military" means of attaining objectives, alluding to my reference to "The effectiveness of high-level bribery in destroying a superpower" (addendum dated August 5 '05 above). But money is not always necessary; conditioned stimuli-- good food, drink and socialization with the enemy -- can also paralyze your will to act. When, after the first invasion of Iraq (during the second invasion of Iraq, American media reported almost all Iraqi military commanders in the field being successfully contacted with offers of bribes, etc., to not fight; almost all of the fighting was done by Iraqi people's militias in cars and SUVs charging American tanks and being cut down by the tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands to the last man without the Americans suffering a single casualty and without anyone having "blundered"; every Indian school boy reads about the charge of the light brigade but the Iraqi people have been and continue to be infinitely more heroic) by the United States, India's chief of army staff said "Never fight the United States without nuclear weapons", he was brought to the United States to be 'neutralised' as the Russian generals are (addendum dated August 2 '05, above). Russia's C.I.A.- agent president has direct control of its intercontinental nuclear missiles (when I referred to Vajpayee being a C.I.A. agent, the control of India's nuclear weapons was taken away from him though only for a while). Along with the destruction of its long-range bombers, such trips to the United States are meant to render these forces ineffective and make the Russian people as open to attack by the United States as have been the Iraqi people.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 13, 2005: The C.I.A.-orchestrated move by the Russian president demanding world prices for gas from Ukraine was meant to provide an occasion for the United States taking control of radars in Ukraine that are part of Russia's early warning system and advance the separation of Ukraine from Russia and incorporation into NATO. Russian gas prices for people in Kiev should be determined as they are for people in Moscow and with a view to the ejection of the United States aggressor from Ukraine as from Russia. The Russian defence ministry should veto this C.I.A.-orchestrated move to destroy Russia. Even when the gas price issue is settled, the episode will be used as an excuse to implement the rest of the scenario regarding the early warning radars, NATO, etc. The Russian defence ministry should move proactively to veto all such plans.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 20, 2005: The move to destroy the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) by expelling experimental physicists and replacing fundamental with applied research (PTI report, Dec. 20 '05, The Hindu, Internet) is meant to destroy India's nuclear program-- which is an offshoot of TIFR-- at the root and is a move by RAW, on orders of the C.I.A., to eliminate the source of India's independence in the nuclear field (see addendums dated July 23, July 29, July 31, August 4, August 11, August 20 and September 9, 2005, above).
ADDED ON DECEMBER 25, 2005: Following the above addendum, dated December 20 '05, the Russian president said that Russia should become the leading country in the field of global energy and "I am certain that our country, its fuel and energy complex and science are ready to take up such a challenge...Russia must become the initiator and the trend setter of energy innovations and new technologies... Digging the ground and mining natural resources in not enough...One has to develop the field innovatively". This is a pathetic and shocking statement to make to a country that has been a world leader in all areas, not just energy and at both the fundamental and applied levels. Nor can it obscure his role in the spectacular and continuing destruction of Russian science by the C.I.A., through himself and his two predecessors. The on-going destruction of Russian science is simply a part of the C.I.A.'s destruction of Russia. The increasing import of foreign technology as well as capital is part of this destruction. As a loyal agent of the C.I.A., the Russian president promoted such imports even in this statement.
ADDED ON DECEMBER 29, 2005: The United States' crimes against Mr. Adamov, Russia and Switzerland:
According to Swiss Radio International, the Swiss federal court has ruled that the former Russian nuclear energy minister, Mr. Yevgeny Adamov, is to be extradited to Russia instead of the United States. I have sent the following E-mail to Switzerland's Federal Office of Justice:-
"Regarding the Adamov matter: please see the addendums dated August 20 and October 5, 2005, to my letter dated May 11, 2005, below. Within hours of my sending the addendum dated October 5 '05, the Assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of the Adamov matter flew to Russia with a team from the FBI, IRS, etc. and made arrangements with the Russian government for Mr. Adamov to be sent to Russia instead of the United States. The Swiss court's decision is a result of those arrangements. As I have said in the above addendums and the rest of the letter sequence, the entire matter regarding Mr. Adamov is a result of the United States government's bribery of Russian presidents. What is your department and the Swiss courts going to do about these crimes of the United States government in which they have made the Swiss government and Swiss courts participants and instruments through fraud and other means?"
Right after the addendum dated October 5 '05, Russia's Prosecutor General had said that the charge against Mr. Adamov was that of "exceeding his brief", thus dropping the charge of "fraud" that had been previously made against him. This is when the American prosecutor made the dash to Russia. The Russian Foreign Ministry tried hard, but unsuccessfully, to falsify the date of the American prosecutor's arrival to make it appear that it was not caused by the addendum dated October 5 '05 and the Russian Prosecutor General's changing the charge against Mr. Adamov to "exceeding his brief" from "fraud" (because this change meant the Russian Prosecutor General will logically bring charges against the current and former Russian presidents for their acts of treason referred to in the addendum dated October 5 '05).
ADDED ON JANUARY 7, 2006: The Russian president is buying a luxury villa on Germany's Baltic Coast in case he has to flee the country (see addendum dated December 29, 2005 above). But that will not end the C.I.A.'s destruction of Russia because Russia is ruled by the C.I.A. through the Russian intelligence agencies, as India is ruled by the C.I.A. through India's RAW and, like India's prime ministers on the C.I.A.'s payroll (the proximate and ultimate loyalty of the Russian intelligence agencies, like RAW's, is to the C.I.A., not to a particular C.I.A.-agent president or prime minister), the departure of a particular president will not change the C.I.A.'s rule over Russia; Russia's destruction by the C.I.A. will continue.
ADDED ON JANUARY 24, 2006: Tactical moves of Russian and Indian intelligence agencies under C.I.A. orders:
It is reported (The Pioneer, January 15 '06, Internet) that the U.S. space agency, NASA, is to "review" the "preliminary design" of India's 'Chandrayan 1' moon mission preparatory to putting its payload on it. Just as the move to shove foreign nuclear technology down India's throat through RAW is meant to enable the U.S. to take control of India's nuclear program, this is a move by the C.I.A., through RAW, to enable the U.S. to take control of India's space program which had taken on European payloads for this mission and given excuses of funding problems, etc., precisely to avoid the U.S. payload and the nefarious design behind it. India should reject all such 'cooperation' and not allow the U.S. to touch its space program with a million mile pole. What India should do is make another ten-fold increase in the number of scientists and engineers working in its space program (see letter dated January 5 '04, below) from ten thousand to a hundred thousand.
Like Russian intelligence agencies 'catching' British spies in Russia as a tactical move in response to the addendum dated January 7 '06 above, suddenly RAW-- which sets all policy under the C.I.A.'s dictates in all departments of government-- is giving funding for an orbiting astrophysical observatory and other "fundamental research" to promote India's "independence" (The Hindu, January 15 '06, Internet) -- because of my addendum dated December 20 '05 above-- to push through this move to enable the U.S. to take control of India's space program. The recent terrorist acts by RAW-- which commits almost all terrorist acts in India as I have said over the years and in these letters-- against the Indian Institute of Science and threats against other science bodies were meant to 'neutralise' the same addendum dated December 20 '05 above about RAW's move to destroy the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 8, 2006: The Russian president's tactical moves in response to addendum dated January 24, 2006:
As I have said, Russia's C.I.A.-agent presidents, like India's C.I.A.-agent prime ministers, come and go but the Russian intelligence agencies, through which the C.I.A. rules Russia as it rules India through India's RAW, go on. After the above addendum, dated January 24 '06, the Russian president held a press conference at which he expressed a spitting contempt for "Sovietologists" who have no understanding of what is happening in Russia (which, as I have said, is Russia's destruction by the C.I.A. through himself and his two predecessors but most of all through the Russian intelligence agencies which are on the C.I.A.'s payroll), went to the Prosecutor General's office to exercise "control" telling them what to do (that is, not bring charges against himself and his two predecessors for their acts of treason referred to in the addendum dated January 7 '06 above, because of which he is buying a luxury villa on Germany's Baltic Coast in case he has to flee the country) and is otherwise asserting himself saying he may take steps to abolish the death penalty (which would be the punishment for treason) but will definitely seek the "opinion" of parliament, lauding the intelligence services (which, like India's RAW committing almost all terrorist acts in India under C.I.A. directions as I have said in these letters and over the years, have committed the biggest terrorist acts in Russia such as killing hundreds in a Moscow apartment building during Yeltsin's time-- as I pointed out at that time-- and the more recent Beslan school massacre) and urging them to eliminate terrorists like rats, etc. But it is still the case that it is the Russian intelligence agencies, whose proximate and ultimate loyalty, like India's RAW's, is to the C.I.A., which are the bigger threat to Russia-- and bigger enemies of Russia which have already inflicted immeasurable destruction on Russia under the C.I.A.'s direction-- than Russia's president. To aid the Russian president and Russian intelligence agencies in their tactical moves, the C.I.A. has started providing them with 24-hour satellite-based audio and video surveillance on the "Sovietologists" (he called this "a qualitatively new level" of "partnership")-- as it does to RAW(see addendum dated November 18 '05 above)-- who, the Russian president said, should be eliminated like rats (he calls the "Sovietologists" terrorists) but the traitors above are the rats who need to be eliminated. A former senior C.I.A. officer referred to Yeltsin as "a creature of C.I.A. support". This is even more so for the present incumbent.
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 10, 2006: Shielding against satellite surveillance:
The following is a response to the above addendum and this letter sequence posted on a Ukrainian news website, with my reply:
Re: The on-going destruction of Russia and Ukraine
Posted by: AK (IP Logged) • Posts:
Date: February 9, 2006 09:30AM
Satchandra, Put some tin foil on your walls, they wont be able to see you, and it'll stop the microwaves they're sending.
Re: The on-going destruction of Russia and Ukraine
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 9
Date: February 9, 2006 11:37AM
Thanks for the suggestion. In a letter to the Indian press several years ago, while referring to such surveillance by satellite, I had mentioned shielding against such surveillance ( upon which they started playing loudspeaker music outside the residence of a scientist, a bachelor who lived in a room in a government guest house and now is India's President, who was the chief science adviser to India's prime minister, because I also mentioned older technology in which a laser beam from miles away is directed at window panes and picks up the tiny vibrations caused by any conversations inside) but did not think of doing it for myself, except vaguely, mainly because I had to move about 40 times in two years thanks to the C.I.A. ( for six and a half months I lived in a library at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology which used to be open 24 hours a day, sleeping on the chairs at night and went without food for upto three weeks at a time) and never knew how long I will be able to live in a given place (both in the United States and in India). But now I will do it! Thanks again!
Re: The on-going destruction of Russia and Ukraine
Posted by: AK (IP Logged) • Posts:
Date: February 9, 2006 06:27PM
Works every time...........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 20, 2006: Interplanetary mining by slave countries: Following this paragraph is an E-Mail sent to India's president on February 19 '06 with this entire letter sequence. Recently he proposed in Singapore designing and building passenger jets in India (instead of buying them from Boeing, etc.) to meet the region's demands and on February 18 '06 he gave to the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, the task of "carrying out study projects for interplanetary missions and mining in planets to augment the material, water and energy resources for the nation...". Both the passenger-jet building and such interplanetary missions have been made possible by my proposal (addendum dated January 24 '06 to letter dated May 11 '05, above) to make another ten-fold increase in the number of scientists and engineers working in India's space program (they have changed space to aerospace because my letter of January 5 '04, below, referred to "aerospace"). RAW steals my ideas and puts them in speeches to be read by Kalam ( sometimes Manmohan Singh), etc., continuing its participation in the crimes of the CIA against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian. In my letter of January 5 '04, I said that a hundred thousand Indian scientists engaged in government-sponsored fundamental research ( 10% of a total of one million) "can form a research community in themselves; their findings need not be shared with the outside world." On the C.I.A.'s orders, RAW put in Kalam's February 18 '06 speech a provision for a "World Knowledge Platform" for "knowledge sharing among all partner countries" (words such as "partnership" and "cooperation" are meant to hide master-slave relations of dominance-submission) so India does not gain an advantage with such research and development. Just like millions of Indians in World Wars I & II fighting under a very few British colonial masters, the idea is that the United States and other master countries will continue to reap the benefits even if slave countries like India have many more scientists and engineers engaged in research and development (mining and digging the ground on other planets instead of in 'food for work' programs on earth). An even more serious consequence will be that the quality and quantity of the knowledge produced by Indian scientists will be greatly reduced compared to what it will be if they do not routinely share their knowledge with the outside world. This kind of disengagement from the master countries is necessary to reverse the master-slave relationship (not sharing knowledge with them does not mean disengagement from the outside world; dominance-submission relations will continue but it will change who will dominate). The E-Mail to India's president follows:-
With reference to i) the letter dated January 5, 2004, ii) the letter dated May 15, 2004 and iii) the addendum dated February 10, 2006 to the letter dated May 11, 2005, in the letter sequence below: what are you willing to do for this Indian scientist?
ADDED ON FEBRUARY 26, 2006: National security crisis due to microwaves from satellites:
I. Microwaves from satellites can be used not just for audio and video surveillance (see addendum dated February 10, 2006 to letter dated May 11, 2005, above). Three days ago, I had put my computer to sleep when I went to sleep. As I approached my work table on getting up a few hours later, the computer switched on without my doing it ; the C.I.A. had switched it on remotely by microwaves hoping I will continue something I was doing on the computer before I went to sleep and this occurred several more times. In the past, when I was doing something, such as preparing one of these letters to the press, on my computer, the screen would suddenly be replaced with, say, a Google search box without my doing anything and it appeared the C.I.A. was remotely controlling my computer over the Internet, but its switching on without being connected to the Internet or the telephone line showed the control was by microwaves. Even signals over the telephone lines usually travel, at least part of the way, over microwaves. This shows that the C.I.A. can control any digital equipment, not just computers, by microwaves from satellites. This applies to all digital equipment, such as that used in a multitude of defence applications, electric power grids, nuclear power plants, etc., even if the equipment is not connected to the outside world by telephone lines. This means that all digital equipment should be shielded so it cannot be operated by microwaves from satellites. The turning on and off of a television set, changing its channels, etc., by a remote is done similarly though TV remotes use infra-red rays instead of microwaves. In a letter to the press several years ago, I also mentioned that the C.I.A. was able to remotely monitor what was being typed on an old-fashioned electric typewriter.
II. If the United States president, the number one criminal in the world, sets foot in India, he should be hanged, along with the gun-toting goons who protect this criminal, from the lamp posts along Rajpath. About India's traitor prime ministers, I said about Vajpayee that an appropriate punishment for him will be that 'his arms and legs should be cut off, ground up, made into a keema and force-fed to him till his own body turns the rest of his body into faeces. Then, when he is hanged, extra weights should be attached to his torso to ensure that the fall breaks his neck. Alternatively, he could be executed by a firing squad.' If India's current imbecile-traitor prime minister utters a single word about India's nuclear program to the Americans, he deserves the death penalty. But neither he nor the traitors of RAW on the C.I.A.'s payroll who, as pieces of dog-faeces, sit at C.I.A.-supplied terminals to participate in the destruction of India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, are fit to be made into dog-food that could be exported to earn a few pennies. I will leave it to the Russians to decide what to do about their traitor president. But first they have to do something about the fact that their intelligence agencies are on the C.I.A.'s payroll.
ADDED ON MARCH 3, 2006, EXPANDED ON MARCH 5, 2006: C.I.A. remains firmly in control of governing India:
Russia's president and intelligence agencies, on the C.I.A.'s payroll, have been killing off Russia's aerospace industry by starving it of funds and replacing Russian aircraft with American imports. The C.I.A., through India's RAW, increased the allocation for India's space program this year, because I referred to 'funding problems' having been used as an excuse to ward off American moves to take control of India's space program (addendum dated January 24 '06 to letter dated May 11 '05), to eliminate this excuse, but the C.I.A. remains firmly in control to ensure that India does not gain independence in either defence or civilian technology even though it produces five times as many engineers per year as the United States. If even a fraction of the ten billion dollars India plans to spend on arms imports from one country alone were spent on research and development, it could produce hundreds of billions of dollars worth of advanced armaments, for its own use as well as exports. If uranium-based nuclear power plants are wanted, the money should be pumped into Indian nuclear research and development-- already more advanced than the United States' in many respects-- expanding it four, six or ten times-- not into imports and India can buy uranium mines abroad, as China is doing, not import fuel from the United States or any other country. Then India could export uranium-based nuclear power plants to other countries, even if it does not want them for its own use. I have said there is absolutely no reason for India to be importing any technology-- civilian or military-- from any country, except for the fact that the C.I.A. remains in firm control, through RAW, of governing India. U.S. security's frisking of Manmohan Singh at Palam airport when he went to receive Bush (no television channel would fabricate such an event) was a symbol of the C.I.A.'s rule. The planned shut down of the completely refurbished Cirus research reactor to please the Americans is meant to throttle India's nuclear research. If India is to switch from Thorium to Uranium for nuclear power production, a military takeover of Australia, which has 40 percent of the world's uranium reserves and of Canada, the world's largest uranium producer, should be part of India's strategic plans. Even if it is not needed for uranium, it is needed for living space ('lebensraum').
ADDED ON MARCH 6, 2006, EXPANDED ON MARCH 8, 2006: India's strategic plans & Australian prime minister's behavior:
After the statement of March 3 '06 above, the Australian prime minister changed his stance about the supply of uranium to India. News photos show him shaking hands with Manmohan Singh with a forced smile on his face that is almost a grimace. Another news photo at a luncheon meeting with Indian businessmen shows him with a very glum face and pursed lips. An Associated Press report carried by the Hindustan Times tried to falsify the time of his making the change, to make it appear it was not caused by the statement above. Manmohan Singh, speaking with a forked tongue in service of his American masters, pays lip service to India's Thorium-based program (why do you need this 'deal' then?) knowing that politicians in C.I.A.-ruled India will be content with his 'clarifications' and will not take any effective action. The militaries can liberate their countries. The Australian prime minister's behavior is a pointer. Likely due to the same reference to India's strategic plans, above, the Russian foreign minister is in the United States on his first ever official visit to discuss various kinds of cooperation. But, as I said several years ago and in the letter dated January 23 '05 below, India's population exceeds the combined population of the G-8 countries and so should its economic and military power.
The United States succeeding in doing to Russia what Germany failed to do:
The American claim of "Manifest Destiny", underlying its expansionism, has been the exact equivalent of the German 'lebensraum' underlying its invasion of Russia in 1941. The Russians fended off that invasion but the United States is succeeding spectacularly and even more comprehensively, through its purchase of traitors such as Putin, in doing what Germany failed to do. Kipling's "The White Man's Burden", subtitled "The United States and the Philippine Islands", was the same as Manifest Destiny and could have been subtitled "The United States and India". The use of native intelligence agencies in Russia and India to commit terrorist acts and control these countries is an Israeli contribution ("Major terrorist act foiled in Ingushetia" on March 7 '06 is the Russian equivalent of the terrorist act in Varanasi, India, on the same day). Everyone succeeds in doing whatever they want to do to India which has been a slave nation for a millenium destined to serve others. But the United States' success in doing the same to Russia is a new development in world history.The Monroe Doctrine, a corollary of Manifest Destiny, was defined by Theodore Roosevelt in 1904 as "an international police power to secure American interests in the Western Hemisphere". A century later, this has been expanded to cover the globe.
ADDED ON MARCH 11, 2006: Stripping away Russia's independence and India's hope for independence:
India's nuclear program is its only hope of casting off the yoke of slavery it has been under for a millenium and the so-called nuclear 'deal' with the U.S. is meant to strip that by making India dependent on unneeded and unwanted foreign nuclear technology and fuel (India designs and builds its own nuclear power plants and can even export them and makes its own nuclear fuel), stopping its nuclear research (such as by putting the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research and other institutions, which collaborate in its strategic program, in a 'civilian' list--this is a way of destroying them and India's strategic program by other means--see addendum dated December 20, 2005, above-- and closing down the research reactor CIRUS under false excuses) and binding it in chains (after making India dependent on unneeded and unwanted foreign nuclear technology and fuel, "US President has power to scrap agreement if after its enactment India detonates a nuclear device", thus capping and later stripping its nuclear weapons program). The United States' tactic is described by an Indian expression roughly translated as 'first catching a finger, then the wrist'. When it comes to the United States, especially in nuclear matters, especially in dealings with non-white countries, agreements, laws, treaties, etc., mean nothing; only raw power counts. The 'deal' is being portrayed in the Indian press, controlled by the C.I.A. through RAW, as something sought by India but which may only grudgingly be 'granted' by the U.S. Congress and government when exactly the opposite is true: it is being shoved down India's throat through RAW and C.I.A.-controlled politicians and arm-twisting of scientists and the show of reluctance by the U.S. Congress is meant to make Indians feel they are getting something when they are being robbed of their future and their most vital national assets and all they are getting is a perpetuation of their thousand year old slavery and the stripping away of their only hope for independence. India should not let the United States anywhere near its nuclear program. Indian politicians as well as RAW are the C.I.A.'s servants. It is time for India's huge military to make itself useful to Indians rather than the white man.
Russia's independence is being stripped away by its unilateral nuclear disarmament described in the letters below and addenda above. A former U.S. defence official at Harvard crows of the success of U.S. policy, comparing present day Russia to Nigeria and of turning a superpower into a medium-sized country that exports oil and gas. Soon the United states will be doing to India what it is doing to Iran, with IAEA inspections, threats of sanctions and invasions and the rest.
ADDED ON MARCH 13, 2006: The on-going crimes against mankind:
(From a Ukrainian news website:)
Can someone suggest popular news websites in Russia for posting in English?
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 27
Date: March 12, 2006 07:37AM
I had tried posting my letters to the press on Pravda.ru but the Russian intelligence agencies, under C.I.A. instructions, shut it down; at least it is not accessible in the United States any more.
Re: Can someone suggest popular news websites in Russia for posting in English?
Posted by: satchandra (IP Logged) • Posts: 27
Date: March 13, 2006 07:18AM
When I posted my letter sequence to the press (that is also posted on this board) on Moscow Times' online Forum last December, it was repeatedly deleted by the editors. But today the Russian intelligence agencies strongly hinted that I could post there and I have done that and am keeping my fingers crossed to see if it remains posted.
The fact of the matter is that, but for the crimes of the C.I.A. against me, anything I say should be on all the wire services of the world instantly as it has greater significance than anything Mr. Putin says or anything criminalbushmonkey says--in whose crimes against me Mr. Putin is still collaborating-- or anything that India's imbecile-traitor prime ministers say. Letting my letters to the press be posted on the Moscow Times online forum in no way lessens these crimes--which are crimes against mankind as a whole-- or the punishment they deserve. The gentleman (or gentlewoman) named "AK" who gave the suggestion (addendum dated February 10, 2006 above) that I put tin foil on my walls so it will stop the microwaves from the U.S. surveillance satellites, was doing so on behalf of Mr. Putin, but that in no way lessens the gravity of these on-going crimes or of his collaboration in them.
FIRST ADDENDUM OF MARCH 15, 2006: Letter to an M.I.T. professor:
Since I mentioned my theory of money to you last evening, I thought I will send, to your E-mail on the MIT website, my recent letters to the press (they start with a letter dated January 5, 2004, at the bottom) referring to it and to the American empire in countries such as India (I have been writing on the American empire in India and such countries for about 25 years). You said you were not sure if Manmohan Singh will write a "blurb" about your book, as you were thinking of asking him to do and I said he will, thinking the book is about developmental economics; but if the book is about 'the American empire in the developing world' (which, according to the MIT website, you are working on), he probably will not (if the book is honest about the American empire) because he is an INSTRUMENT of the American empire in India. The addendums below suggest some of the ways this is so. But I have a LOT more material on it (my experiences in the United States over the past four decades and things I have written about those experiences involving a succession of prime ministers from Indira Gandhi onwards and Indians and Americans in various private and governmental realms, document the primordial facts of this empire better than any other sources I can think of). I have also been trying to DO something about this empire. In fact, U.S. intelligence agencies and successive U.S. presidents have considered me the greatest threat to the American empire in India and elsewhere and treated me accordingly. I have also been a critic (as well as defender of some aspects) of the Indian culture and the role of Indians in the maintenance of this empire. Something I wrote documenting the naked and shocking facts of this empire i) caused a Russian court to release the accused, such as the KGB chief, who were responsible for the Soviet coup of 1991 and ii) caused CBS News to send me a certified letter, return receipt requested, expressing an interest in doing a 'Sixty Minutes' report on it (though I did not respond). You said something about how concerned Indians are about the poor; well, I have a lot of material on it and have written about that and have been DOING something about it that, I believe, has the promise of being by far the most effective intervention in the history of mankind, far more effective than Marx or anyone else, as I say in these letters.
SECOND ADDENDUM OF MARCH 15, 2006: Maintaining C.I.A.'s control over Russia and India:
India's press, controlled by the C.I.A. through RAW, and government have been celebrating the Russian decision to supply fuel for the Tarapur reactors despite U.S. "reservations" (which are meant to make Indians grab at the Russian offer).The fact is that Indian scientists had made indigenous fuel for Tarapur when the U.S. stopped fuel supply but RAW, whose central function is to keep India under the heels of white countries, stopped that indigenously made fuel program for Tarapur. RAW suppresses, in service of the Americans, research of various kinds such as energy sources that go beyond conventional nuclear power. An M.I.T. scientist, on American radio, described how Indian scientists at the Bhabha Atomic Research Center were "going crazy" with their research and results on cold fusion--which generates energy in table top experiments with simple apparatus-- but when vested interests (hot fusion, which gets multiple billions of dollars per year in funding, feels threatened, among others) in the United States had a U.S. government body declare cold fusion invalid (on ludicrous grounds such as that, under the laws of Physics, such a thing cannot occur; under such logic, Einstein's Theory of Relativity would have been ruled invalid because it violated Newton's Laws; within the past week, there have been reports in the New York Times about an Indian scientist in the U.S. struggling against his successful cold fusion research being declared invalid and shut down), RAW, which functions as a branch of the C.I.A., "killed it" (the research on cold fusion at BARC). The C.I.A. knew I was listening to this broadcast and this M.I.T. scientist, who could have been a source of support (he had criticized Einstein; I have written about Einstein stealing most of his ideas from others) was brutally murdered shortly after that broadcast. I have said before that other American and Indian scientists who have known me or could have been sources of support have died sudden, premature deaths. Among numerous new sources of energy are research results and serious proposals to get energy from empty space, that is, vacuum (before you look askance at this, know that, under modern theories of Cosmology, a branch of Physics, the entire universe has arisen out of absolutely nothing).
During World War II, the Germans made large scale conversion of coal into motor fuel. With petroleum prices where they are now, this old technology is highly economical and viable. But anything that lessens the United states' control over India is suppressed by RAW. Any steps, such as increased funding for the space program or fundamental research mentioned in these addendums, in response to criticisms, are taken under instructions of the C.I.A. to maintain its control over India. The same is the case in Russia.
RAW regularly plants disinformation in the Indian press to mislead critics and at first I thought the reports of the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research and other institutions being put in a 'civilian' list were such disinformation but decided to refer to it in case it was true. If true, I have said this is another way of killing these institutions and fundamental research in India. At the same time, as part of its C.I.A.-mandated suppression of the undersigned by, among other things, stealing my ideas and putting them in the mouths of others, RAW arranged for a "Standing Advisory Committee--Overseas" (Times of India, March 14 '06, Internet) to emphasize the need for more research and development in India.
ADDED ON MARCH 21, 2006: Why Luxembourg's resistance to takeover of steel company by Indian is justified:
Such takeovers are a form of imperialism. Takeovers by those your peers in knowledge and morals may be fine. But a takeover by inferior, parasitic people such as Indians (this is not about any particular company but about Indians in general) can only do harm. India produced the best steel and the best swords in the world a few centuries ago. The rust-free iron pillar of Delhi is testimony to India's superiority in antiquity. But present-day India is a cesspool of inferiority. Luxembourg should ward it off as it would an epidemic of mad-cow disease.
ADDED ON MARCH 23, 2006: The virus of inferiority in Russia and India:
India's nuclear program is an island of health and superiority in the cesspool of inferiority that is India. Through the so-called nuclear 'deal', this island is sought to be eliminated. To 'neutralise' what I said about a military takeover of Australia in India's strategic plans, RAW sent the Army chief to Australia on the pretext of giving medals to two weight-lifters with no connection to the Army. But the Army chief should be spending his time not to obey RAW but to destroy RAW. Russia's Putin is a virus of inferiority destroying Russia. An article in Foreign Affairs about the United States having regained its nuclear supremacy of the 1940s says what I have been saying about Russia's on-going destruction. But there seem to be no doctors in Russia to destroy this virus.
In both Russia and India, the task of destroying the instruments of C.I.A. rule-- RAW in India, the Russian intelligence agencies, Putin and his 'economic bloc'-- can be accomplished over days, weeks and months, if not all at once and with guerrilla tactics, if not open military action, so long as the patriotic forces keep the objective of destroying them in front and focus on their progress in destroying them, aware of their countermeasures, decoys and dodges. (Incidentally, I had pointed out several years ago that the heart attack which killed an Army chief, Gen. B. C. Joshi, was induced by RAW for his showing my 'influence' and the sudden illness and premature death of a CPM leader two days after I referred to sudden, premature deaths in the second addendum of March 15 '06 may have been caused by RAW because there have been a number of indications of the C.I.A.'s attempted or successful purchase of some Left politicians and murder is a part of its bag of tricks).
Almost everyday now, RAW and U.S. intelligence agencies send me E-mail containing viruses, some of them purportedly from myself as the sender (such as from this E-mail account), thus also demonstrating they can send E-Mail in my name to others. I will put the text of this letter sequence on my webpage (whose address is at the start of letter dated May 11, 2005, below), so the authenticity of any letter can be checked.
Satish Chandra
A COMMUNICATION DATED JUNE 22, 2005:
From : Satish Chandra
Sent : Wednesday, June 22, 2005 7:23 AM
To : raajjeess@yahoo.co.in
CC : satchandra04@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: Contact accepted
Hi! I did not delete my profile. I tried to log on to Jeevansathi.com just now and got the message that this username does not exist! There is an Indian government agency called the Research and Analysis Wing that has been harassing me, in cooperation with the C.I.A., for the past 25 years or so and it must have deleted my profile. I am including below my recent letters to the press which will give you an idea of what has been going on (see, in particular, the letter dated January 5, 2004, below). I will try to recreate my profile but I am not sure they will not do this, or something else, again. Satish Chandra
From: raj adholiya To: satchandra04@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Contact accepted Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:37:50 +0100 (BST)
Hi... your profile shows deleted on jeevansaathi. so could u plz send us your details through mail. along with the photograph? thanks-awaiting ur mail. Pramod & Raj
satchandra04@hotmail.com wrote:
You are receiving this mail as a registered member of Jeevansathi.com Please add contacts@jeevansathi.com to your address book to ensure delivery into your inbox
　
Dear Mann_AdholiyaYour Initial contact has received a favourable response!!!
JeevanSathi Member handsomeguyboston has accepted your initial contact.
handsomeguyboston’s Contact Details for sending personalised messages are: E-mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com Address: P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, U.S.A.
　
To view handsomeguyboston’s profile, click here.
However, there are still 5 Member/s awaiting your response:
People who are still waiting for your response:search_life : 32 / 5' 8" / Hindu / Gupta / Delhi, India / Sales joelraj : 27 / 5' 5" / Christian / Protestant / Tamil Nadu, India / Hotels/ Restaurants bhaveshpt03 : 31 / 5' 10" / Jain / Jain / Gurgaon, India / Accounts/ Tax/ CS/ Audit yourworsehalf? : 32 / 5' 2" / Hindu / Brahmin Gaud Saraswat (GSB) / Mumbai, India / IT Software amit_18_asthana : 26 / 5' 7" / Hindu / Kayastha / Kanpur, India / Banking/ Insurance To log in to "My JeevanSathi", click here. We wish you the best in your partner search.
Warm regards,
The JeevanSathi Team www.jeevansathi.com
Date: May 9, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
It is time for the signatories to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to annul it. If a new treaty is put forward, it must observe the democratic principle that countries of the world can have nuclear arms with a total megatonnage in proportion to their populations. Also, it is time to put an end to the American military occupation of Germany and Japan. They will have to develop nuclear arms-- which they can do rapidly-- to be secure. The United Nations General Assembly must adopt a resolution condemning the innumerable aggressions and occupations against other countries that the United States has committed since World War II and demanding that no United States military forces remain outside the United States after six months from the date of the resolution. If the United States does not comply, the United Nations General Assembly should adopt a resolution declaring the United States The Enemy of Mankind.
Satish Chandra
Date: May 7, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
Russia will do well to annul all arms control agreements made from the time of Gorbachev on, in part because while the Americans come to make sure that Russia's nuclear warheads are destroyed and supervise and participate in the destruction, the Americans simply put their own nuclear warheads in storage. If Russia brings the number of its strategic warheads down to 1,700, even Israel will have more warheads than it.
But nothing will come of it if Russian heads of state continue to be American puppets.
Satish Chandra
Date: May 6, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
The C.I.A. controlled India's puppet prime ministers in part by providing misleading information which it was able to do because of their treasonous relationship with it (which kept them in office). When Russia's president refers to "cave nationalism and xenophobia" of some people, denying "rights and freedoms" of others, he is unaware of the far worse caveman behavior and crimes of the Americans to which the "cave nationalism and xenophobia" of others is a reaction. If he knew about them, he will know that simply shaking hands with Bush or sitting near him is a crime against humanity.
A head of state who is a puppet of a foreign intelligence agency can in no way serve the interests of his country.
Perhaps a month ago, while announcing his intention to press for expulsion of Russia from the G-8, a United States legislator referred to the Russian president as a "spoiled child". He referred to the Russian president as a child in part because of the ease with which the C.I.A. is able to control him by providing him misleading information. The Russian president refers to this as 'a very high level of relations with the United States'.
Satish Chandra
Date: May 3, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
The massive, MASSIVE terrorism of European jews driving millions of Palestinians out of their homes and into refugee camps, where they remain, is the cause of the so-called muslim terrorism which is nothing more than a little bit of retaliation for a much bigger crime. The United States was behind the massive terrorism of the European jews against the Palestinians so it is not surprising that the tiny bit of retaliation, killing a tiny fraction of the deaths the Palestinians and other Arabs have suffered at the hands of the Americans, is primarily directed against the United States. By means of a trick arranged by the C.I.A. and the jews yesterday, the United States claimed a right to call itself a 'democracy' and resumed threatening Russia with expulsion from the G-8 for lacking 'freedom of the press', etc., via resolutions introduced by the jews in both houses of the United States legislature, while the C.I.A. at the same time signalled the Russian Foreign Ministry to issue a statement: "World community must unite in fighting terrorism". But it is to fight the United States that the world community must unite. It can do so without the use of nuclear arms if the countries of the world take two simple steps: break all relation-- economic, diplomatic, etc.-- with the United States and not allow any American-- civilian or military-- to set foot on their soil (Britain and European countries need not join in this if they don't want to). It does not make sense for the Russian government to actively collaborate in the disintegration and destruction of their country promoted by the United States and complain about much smaller injuries, involving muslims, that are a fall-out of that disintegration and of the Americans' aggressions against the muslims.
Two headlines say "Georgia won't use force against Abkhazia, S. Ossetia-- Saakashvili" and "Russian official, U.S. diplomat discuss S. Ossetia". The various 'positive' statements the Georgian president makes about Russia from time to time are at the prompting of the C.I.A., so the U.S. can keep 'stringing Russia along' so it does not get too alarmed -- as part of verbal control by intermittent reinforcement with conditioned stimuli (see letter dated February 26, 2005, below) -- even as the United States destroys Russia.
Satish Chandra
Date: April 29, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
The problem with a "multi-party system" as a definition of democracy is not difficult to see: all of the 'oligarchs' in a country could form several competing political parties and, with their financial and media clout, collect a lot of votes, form governments, etc., but that will not make it a democracy (see letter dated April 25, 2005, below) or serve the masses. Competing princes have always fought for the throne throughout history, in all countries, with large armies of their countrymen willing to fight and die for them. George W. Bush claims good 'personal' relations with a lot of people, including puppets he has set up by military force and gives them guards of honor, addresses to joint sessions of Congress and all the honors due to heads of state. But when the head of a real superpower, with a nuclear arsenal quite comparable to that of the United States, behaves like a puppet of the United States and collaborates with it in weakening and destroying his own country unnecessarily, something is wrong (see letter dated February 26, 2005, below, referring to the "mysteriously self-destructive behavior" of Soviet/Russian leaders since the mid-eighties). George W. Bush said yesterday he trusted the Russian president's words about his commitment to democracy. The latter should tell him he is committed to democracy but bringing democracy (see letter below) to the United States will require nuclear war, so he is holding off on it.
Satish Chandra
Date: April 25, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
A headline says "Democratic values as important as economic success-- Putin". The greatest of all democratic values is equality. But a system in which some individuals have billions of roubles and others struggle for basic necessities of life has no equality nor freedom nor rights. The Soviet system was far more equal and, therefore, far more democratic. Observation has shown that those who amass billions do so through crime-- injuring others-- not superior merit.
My proposal about money, with its unlimited amount of capital and government as the dispenser of money, makes for a more equal, democratic and just as well as free-- and incomparably more prosperous and strong-- society.
Surrender to a foreign enemy under threat of force (see letter below) makes for neither freedom nor equality.
Satish Chandra
Date: April 19, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
After the tsunami, the Indian government announced a program of providing bank loans to fishermen to buy new boats. Understandably, few have come forward to go into debt. With an unlimited amount of money provided by my proposal about money, the government will do the economy the most good by providing the money for boats as grants, not loans. Russia's program of providing housing for the people by having them take on mortgages (that is, loans) is doomed to failure. The Soviet system of the government giving housing to the people, combined with my proposal about money, will make for an incomparably better economic future. The only reason not to do that is an abject surrender to all things American, while American functionaries come kicking them in the teeth. After my letter dated February 11 '04, below, Russia announced a manned mission to Mars by 2014. After the letter dated April 8 '05, below, referring to the dangers of getting ahead of the United States, it cancelled the plan. Pakistan's president chided India for giving up a plan for a gas pipeline from Iran for fear of the 'American reaction'. Last November Russia's president referred to the United States wanting dictatorship of the world. By implementing my proposal about money, countries like Russia and India 'have nothing to lose but their chains and a world to win'.
Since government as a dispenser of money (and subsidies) is central to my proposal about money, membership in the World Trade Organization is ruled out.
Satish Chandra
Date: April 16, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
Vajpayee has said he fears a bad name more than death. As the recognition is dawning in India that he has been an agent of the C.I.A. against India, he was referring to the prospect of his being hanged.
When the United States refers to spreading democracy around the world, it means spreading rule by the C.I.A. (see letters below).
Satish Chandra
Date: April 8, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
It is said that with "more government involvement in the economy...competition decreases in such a situation and this reduces the economy's effectiveness and the pace of economic growth". But the ability to print and invest money without limit (letters below) is a competitive advantage -- including an ability to make the economy grow at twentyseven percent or more per year and funding innovation-- that brings with it all other competitive advantages and totally swamps any alternatives. In a letter to the Indian press several years ago, I said that, instead of having one Defence Research and Development Organisation, India could have ten such parallel organisations-- made possible by my proposal about money-- three of which could compete on the design of a new tank, three on a new jet fighter, etc., and let the best one win. This is what the United States government does-- it funds competing prototypes of new weapon systems by different companies and then selects the one considered the best. But the same can be done in the civilian sector (cars, passenger jets, can openers, etc., etc.). Not to grab at the comprehensive and unmatchable competitive advantage provided by my proposal about money means that a government is not interested in competitive advantage, at least not for the country (in countries such as India, it is recognised by everyone, inside and outside the country, that the governments' main interest is in maintaining their competitive advantage over the rest of the population). But there is also the fear in some countries that getting ahead of the United States -- with its unrelenting, mad-dog aggression-- will mean nuclear war, which the United States is willing for but other countries are not (see letters dated June 27 '04 and December 5 '04, below). Hence they choose surrender. The bogus excuse of choosing "financial stability" over a twentyseven percent, or more, GDP growth rate per year is part of such surrender. But, as I have said, that is a choice of suicide. And the military and economic advantage provided by my proposal about money is such that it will enable the world to disarm the United States.
Some governments have tried to STEAL my proposal about money, as the United States and Indian governments did (letter dated February 26 '05 below). But, as I said in the letter dated July 14 '04, below, "Countries applying Chandraism to their economies can greatly accelerate their progress by saying they are doing so".
Besides innovation, competition is said to promote "efficiency". In a letter to the Indian press several years ago I said something like the following: suppose a government asks for bids to build a new 100-mile railway line. One contractor offers to build it for one billion rupees, a second for two billion rupees. Which bid should the government select? Under my proposal about money, the answer is the bid for two billion rupees because with it the government will be pumping twice as much money into the economy as with the first bid and, through the 'multiplier effect' (letters below; this effect requires that the money circulates in your own economy, as the contractor buys goods and services with the rupees and those who receive the money from the contractor in turn buy further goods and services with the rupees and so on-- and will not occur if you choose a foreign contractor and pay the contractor in dollars), will be increasing the Gross Domestic Product a great deal more than if it had chosen the first contractor. The cost to the government-- the cost of printing the money-- will be essentially the same.
Satish Chandra
Date: April 4, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
When an American psychologist was given the Nobel Prize in Economics a couple of years ago, I pointed out that his work had not the millionth part of the significance my work has for Economics. After I sent the first paragraph of the letter dated February 26, 2005, below, a United States senator referred to someone "empowering the bad guys". The people being empowered themselves opt for "financial stability" over a twentyseven percent, or more, GDP growth rate per year. But "stability" simply means a continuation of poverty (relative to your adversaries) and weakness and, ultimately, oblivion. "Balance between exchange rates and inflation"? Exchange rates are irrelevant for an economy which grows on money printed and invested by the government and inflation is not a problem when the production of goods and services keeps pace with the money supply. "Rational tax system"? Taxes are not needed and are an irrational holdover from the past when a government can print all the money it wants. All the so-called 'macroeconomic issues' are simply swept away and become irrelevant when you implement my proposal about money.
Satish Chandra
Date: April 1, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
The move to make an Indian the new Pope is the other side of the coin of the ongoing assault on the Shankaracharya. The move to make Mother Teresa a saint on the basis of fabricated 'miracles' was similar and was dropped only when I pointed that out. India should make quite clear its displeasure over the move to make an Indian the Pope.
People such as Vajpayee have characterised the assault on the Shankaracharya as something that hurts the "religious sentiments" of some people. But it is not a matter of religion. The knowledge of man and the world of which people like the Shankaracharyas are the repositories is so superior to anything that Western science has come up with so far that there is no comparison between them at all. What I said in the letter dated November 19 '04, below, is just a small example. I had gone from physical science to psychology because even our knowledge of the physical world comes to us through our senses. Modern experimental work has shown how the world is 'constructed' by our own perception and my own experimental work-- which has been blocked and remains unpublished-- has taken it to a new level altogether. All these are confirmations of the maxim "Yatha drishti, tatha Srishti", but the corpus of knowledge this maxim is a part of is not merely a collection of philosophical maxims but science and technology. When you take "a dive into the Self", to use the expression of the teacher of the discipline mentioned in the letter dated November 19 '04, below, you eventually find the "devatas" there but it is still science, not religion.
Perhaps a month ago, an article in Outlook about the Indian Army's report on Kargil mentioned that there was political instability in India at the time involving the Vajpayee government. I said at the time of Kargil that the 'incursions' involved forces sponsored by India's Research and Analysis Wing. The war was staged by RAW, on orders of the C.I.A., to bolster Vajpayee's government, which it succeeded in doing (see letter dated May 15, 2004, below, on the C.I.A.'s attempts to keep Vajpayee in office). The Army's report on Kargil mentions the total lack of intelligence inputs from RAW during Kargil, with the exception of a purported intercept of a telephone conversation of Pakistan's army chief. This was because RAW was the sponsor of the Kargil incursions; regarding the fabricated intercept, see letter dated November 29, 2004, below, about RAW's fabrications. The Indian Peacekeeping Force in Sri Lanka had suffered well over a thousand dead in a short time at the hands of the LTTE (created and controlled by RAW, as I have said over the years); this was because RAW was providing intelligence to the LTTE about the Indian Army's movements.
The above are only small examples of the extent to which India remains in the grip of its foreign enemies, through RAW (which is also behind the assault on the Shankaracharya, as I have said below) -- a grip that is tighter and more difficult to deal with than when the white man directly ruled India.
Satish Chandra
Date: February 26, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4943 (NEW fax number)
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com (Access to this web page is sometimes blocked by the C.I.A.)
Dear Editor:
Suppose a government wishes to increase the country's Gross Domestic Product by twenty, thirty or forty percent in a given year over and above, say, a seven percent increase that is expected. All it has to do is print and spend an additional amount, equal to twenty, thirty or forty percent of the GDP, in that year on productive purposes. By definition, the GDP would have increased by an additional twenty, thirty or forty percent that year (not counting the multiplier effect, referred to in the letters below, which will depend on how the money is spent). Printing the money takes no creativity, thinking up productive purposes to spend it on does not take much either. The money can be spent directly by the government, through private parties or both ways though, of course, by spending the money directly, the government does not have to wait for private parties to come up with proposals. The important thing is that how much the GDP grows next year-- seven percent or twenty seven percent or more-- is strictly in the government's own hands.
Terms such as "deficits" (there are no deficits when all the money a government spends is printed by it; if the government does take in money as taxes or charges, the effects of deficits on interest rates occur only if the government borrows the additional money, not if it prints it) and "overheating" of the economy are worthless concepts which only serve to maintain the status quo in which various people have a vested interest. As I wrote four years ago, "people get pleasure from the pain and deprivation of others and [reference to a head of government], who is no exception, will not want [a change]".
Note that the recommendation above is to print and spend an amount equal to twenty, thirty or forty percent of the GDP IN ADDITION TO whatever the government was otherwise going to do by way of taxing (unnecessary as it is) and spending, etc. Since the production of goods and services, including consumer as well as capital goods, will rise right along with the additional spending, any effects of the additional spending will be benign. Even if some adverse effects are postulated, in no way can they overcome the huge advantage from a GDP growth of twentyseven percent or more over seven percent in a year.
During war, government spending on equipment and supplies (guns and bullets, etc.) can suddenly increase ten, twenty or fifty times. During World War II, the United States government put in place price controls (under J. K. Galbraith) to curb the inflationary effect of such spending (since production capacity was diverted to war equipment and supplies from consumer items). (It was the enormous increase in U. S. government spending during World War II that gave rise to its 'National Debt'). A similarly sudden and large increase in government spending in peace time on the production of food, clothing, shelter, transportation, etc., for the citizenry will not result in the kind of price rise the United States expected in World War II, because the production of consumer goods and services will increase along with the money supply-- even if a lot of the additional spending is directed to military purposes. In any case, price controls can be used in peace time, if necessary, as in war time.
The United States, sitting on top of the world economically and militarily, may not feel any need to increase its GDP by twentyseven percent or more in a year. For governments of countries such as India, not to do that is treasonous as well as stupid.
With a growth rate of twentyseven percent per year, a country's GDP will double every three years. India's per capita income will equal that of the United States in fifteen years (the development and implementation of environment-protection technologies will be a part of the expenditure program) and Russia's in six years. And this will not depend on the vagaries of markets (in no way can markets bring this about) but, as pointed out above, will be strictly in a government's own hands. 'Oligarchs' (there are a lot of oligarchs in India but the masses remain impoverished) can never equal a government's ability to print money and, in any case, a government has to be a dispenser of justice as well as money (often justice equals money). All the advantages of motivation, etc., ascribed to 'free enterprise' are also available to a government, as pointed out below (letter dated February 8, 2005). Apart from standards of living, there are military and geo-strategic consequences and the ever-increasing despotism of the United States means that this has to be done on a war footing. India's government does not do it because several of India's prime ministers (Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee) have been on the payroll of the C.I.A. and its real 'government', the Research and Analysis Wing, functions as a branch of the C.I.A. (see letter dated January 5, 2004, below). But what about a country such as Russia? Here another factor needs to be considered.
American press reports 3-4 years ago referred to satellite-based technology the United States has had in place to monitor "the conversations of foreign leaders" (not just conversations over the telephone or other electrical/electronic media though it includes ability to monitor electrical/electronic communications of all kinds also). Since at least 1977, the United States has been able to keep individuals under 24-hour video and audio surveillance by satellite. Psychologist B. F. Skinner of Harvard made no secret of "my spies" keeping me under such surveillance, one use of which is a C.I.A. program started by Skinner to "control" a targeted individual's behavior by various verbal (including the use of conditioned stimuli, ratio schedules, etc.) and other means. I was targeted primarily due to Skinner's personal motivation flowing from the fact that I had exposed his plagiarism and destroyed his school of psychology but also because I have been the only threat to the United States' ability to keep India economically, technologically and militarily weak and under its boots (in part through my 'influence' on Prime Minister Indira Gandhi --about which Skinner asked "How about your political contacts on either side-- Mrs. Gandhi?" though I had not breathed a word about any such 'contacts' -- and former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi-- both of whom were assassinated for this reason by India's Research and Analysis Wing on the C.I.A.'s orders). But it would have been surprising if the United States had not used such surveillance and control over other foreign leaders.
An article in a Russian newspaper by an American capitalist consultant on Russia a couple of months ago referred to "the mysteriously self-destructive behavior" of Russia's leaders, referring to the dismantling of the benefits system (the same system of benefits can be administered by private contractors, if desired, who will be paid by the government and those who got free transportation before can still get free transportation), but such behavior started in the mid-eighties, with Mikhail Gorbachev. It is more than likely that similar surveillance and control has been used against Soviet/Russian leaders.
It is noteworthy that both the United States government and the Indian government had proceeded to implement my proposal about money, as you will see if you click on the link below and see my letters dated August 1, 2001; September 6, 2001 and April 13, 2001 (also the letters about stock market manipulation by the U.S. Treasury Department by pumping money into the stock market; Bush made a trip through an underground tunnel from the White House to the Treasury Department to see the set up created for such manipulation):
http://www.thecurrentonline.com/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1
When I pointed out that they were trying to STEAL my proposal about money, they stopped implementing it.
Satish Chandra
Date: February 8, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
My proposal about money (letters below) does not impede free enterprise; to the contrary. At the time of India's 'supercyclone', I wrote the government should invite any and all individuals and organisations to 'find a need and fill it and be reimbursed at double your cost'. I wrote this is a formula to take care of such situations 'swiftly, painlessly and almost magically'. In non-emergency situations, a profit of 50% may be enough incentive. As I have written, the government's role should be that of a dispenser of money. It should ensure that no worthwhile project or proposal goes unfunded. As I wrote, 'Let a million five-year (or two-year) plans bloom'.
Satish Chandra
Date: January 30, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
The Russian government responded to the letter below by pooh-poohing "ideological prejudices and mercenary interests". I have said below how enslaved the Indian government is to the Americans, causing and perpetuating the suffering of Indians. The Americans are succeeding in bringing the Russian government in a similar relationship.
I have referred below to the fallacy because of which exports and earning a lot of foreign exchange are considered a good thing. When you export to the United States and earn dollars, those dollars, when used to purchase American goods and services, start chains of economic activity in the United States and, through the 'multiplier effect', increase the Gross Domestic Product of the United States, not your own country's, by several times the amount of purchase. For this reason, I said several years ago, a crore of goods and services sold domestically is worth several crores of goods and services sold abroad, so far as the effect on India's prosperity is concerned. In India there is a rapidly growing class of people who provide, for example, "call center" services to the Americans and many engineering graduates in India work in these jobs because of the pay rates. If the Indian government was serving India's economic interests, by implementing my proposal about money, these workers will be serving the needs of Indian consumers, not of Americans (and engineers will be doing engineering, not call center jobs). These examples are the least of the economic and political horrors India's slave relationship to the United States involves.
When the Russian government sells a portion of a Russian oil company to an Indian company which provides it with, say, five billion dollars, what will those five billion dollars accomplish that the Russian government cannot accomplish by printing an equivalent amount in roubles? Being able to print money without limit (except those set by environmental effects) means a government has an unlimited amout of money for investment. Seeking foreign investment is the same as unnecessarily giving away your country's assets to foreigners. The Indian government does the same and is guilty of treason as well as stupidity.
When the United States buys any goods and services from other countries, it pays in dollars which the other countries can only use by buying American goods and services and, in the process, increasing the American Gross Domestic Product through the 'multiplier effect'. When India buys goods and services from the United States, it cannot pay in rupees.
Satish Chandra
Date: January 23, 2005
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
My proposal about money is in the economic field what nuclear weapons are in the military field and the white countries are as intent on denying economic power it will bring to the lesser breeds as they are on denying the military power of the nuclear bomb. A member of the G-8 has written to the prime minister of Britain, which has summoned India, to exercise "authority" over India of the white countries (as a Japanese academic said to me, Japan is a colony of the United States which has hundreds of military bases on its soil) which are the "major donors" in the tsunami relief and to intimidate the Indian government into not implementing my proposal about money. As should be clear from my letter dated January 21, 2005, below, the dispensers of money-- whether the white countries or the multilateral bodies controlled by them-- are the government of the governments of countries like India.
In a letter to the Indian press I said several years ago that India's national security requires that it take steps to proactively disarm and, if necessary, destroy the G-8 countries (leave out Japan) whose combined population does not equal India's. This is the standard against which the Indian government should judge itself. By implementing my proposal about money, this is entirely feasible.
As I have said (letter dated July 14, 2004, below), my proposal about money is the greatest development in the history of social science-- greater than Marxism-- and, arguably, the greatest development in human history. Instead of meeting criminalbushmonkey in February, Russia's president (who wrote the above letter to Britain's prime minister because he couldn't countenance a mere Indian giving economic advice, never mind the jew from Harvard-- a beneficiary of the crimes against me there-- devastating the Russian economy with galloping inflation-- bringing the rouble to something like 10,000 to a dollar-- and causing untold and continuing misery, cutting industrial production, per capita incomes and life expectancy, etc., etc.) should study what I have written about money and greatly improve the prospects for Russia and the world.
Satish Chandra
Date: January 21, 2005
From: Satish Chandra
Subject: Reply to second letter from the editor (below)
Letting all individuals print their own money is ruled out by the fact that people will still have to produce goods and services and the money they receive has to be conditional on their producing. Hence a government is needed as a dispenser of money. When and if automatic machines provide all goods and services in unlimited amounts, money will simply not be needed. (Not all individuals need to produce, however. When the government gives money to pensioners, for example, that still raises the Gross Domestic Product because this money generates a chain of economic activity when the pensioners spend it on goods and services, just as money spent by 'working' people does). But, within limits, individuals CAN print their own money, as they do when they write checks (cheques) against a line of credit and that does get the economy going. (It is a matter of interpretation whether the line of credit is money provided by a bank or credit card company or the individual is 'printing' the money when writing a check against the line of credit. If the line of credit is the money, then at least the banks and credit card companies, in addition to the government, are 'printing'/creating money-- within broad guidelines provided by the country's central bank-- as the United States government can print money only within limits-- the 'National Debt' ceiling-- set by the United States Congress; the Congress provides a 'line of credit' to the government and increases the line of credit when it raises the ceiling on the 'National Debt'). In the United States, the savings rate is negative and the 'irrational exuberance' of the citizenry splurging under debt does contribute greatly to American prosperity, as I have pointed out. My proposal about money, however, leads to a rational prosperity and money is a device that makes productive behavior possible, as I said in my 1997 letter. I have discussed in numerous letters and articles a number of practical as well as philosophical issues connected with it (such as what will happen to the concept of property-- it "will survive in a weakened form"-- and the fallacy because of which exports and earning a lot of foreign exchange are considered a good thing).
No entity-- government, bank, credit card company or individual-- can print/create money without limit because of environmental effects.
Satish Chandra
From: "Editorial - AsiaLaw (HK)" To: "Satish Chandra" Subject: RE: Reply to an editor who asked "Ever heard of inflation?" Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:43:49 +0800
OK thanks for clearing that up Satish Things must be nice in a non-finite world What if we allowed all the world's citizens to print their own money? That would really get the economy up and running... Surely?
　
Date: January 20, 2005
From: Satish Chandra
Subject: Reply to an editor who asked "Ever heard of inflation?"
I have dealt with the issue of inflation, both in the 1997 letter cited in this letter and elsewhere. When I said in this letter that providing benefits in kind will ensure that the funds are used for productive purposes, it also meant that it will ensure there is a corresponding increase in the production of goods and services. Inflation occurs when the production of goods and services does not keep pace with the money supply. In the 1997 letter I refer to controlling prices, if necessary.
Going beyond the demand-supply mechanism involved in inflation, I have pointed to the role of "inflationary expectations" in generating inflation and what the government can do to avoid generating "inflationary expectations". For example, I have pointed to the feasibility and desirabilty of not raising railway fares even if fuel prices go up and not raising fuel prices even if the price of imported crude oil goes up-- to avoid generating "inflationary expectations".
After I pointed out a "multiplier effect" because of which each rupee printed and spent by the government increases the Gross Domestic Product by several rupees, the United States Department of Labor estimated that each dollar the U.S. government provides to unemployed people as unemployment compensation increases the Gross Domestic Product by more than two dollars. (By the way, Mr./Ms. Editor, I have had more higher education than anyone I have ever met in my entire life, including those on the Harvard University faculty. The only reason I have not received at least three Nobel Prizes is the crimes of the Americans against me-- and against mankind. See my webpage for my professional training: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com ).
Satish Chandra
From: "Editorial - AsiaLaw (HK)" To: "Satish Chandra" Subject: RE: Second Expansion of Letter dated December 29, 2004 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:47:58 +0800
Ever heard of inflation?
Date: December 29, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
At the time of the 'supercyclone' that hit India about five years ago, I pointed out that the more money the Indian government prints and spends on relief, the more the Indian economy will benefit ( see my proposal about money; letter dated January 5 '04, below), because the amount so spent will increase the Gross Domestic Product by several times that amount. So long as the money so spent is used for productive purposes-- on both goods and services-- and is not taken from money earmarked for other purposes but is additional money printed by the government, the more money the government prints and spends, the better for India. Instead of a thousand crores, the government should spend a hundred thousand crores and even more, on short term as well as long term measures. India lacks neither money nor manpower-- civil or military-- to deal with this or any other problem and should reject the military "coalition" which the United States has seized the opportunity to draw India into.
The death and destruction the United States has inflicted on Iraq is greater than any country has suffered from the tsunami. All countries should refuse any assistance from the United States or cooperation with it in tsunami relief or any other enterprise.
In a letter to the Indian press several years ago, I pointed out that Indian Railways need not collect any fares from passengers (or freight charges) at all since the government can print all the money it needs to pay for the service, at a negligible cost (the cost of printing the money) and, in the process, greatly benefit the economy. In fact, as I have said (letter published in three parts in The Observer of Business and Politics, New Delhi, on March 11, 12 & 13, 1997), the government need not take in any money at all-- in the form of taxes, charges or borrowings-- when it can print all the money it wants. The more money the government prints and spends for goods and services, the more the economy will benefit (printing paper currency can be replaced with, say, electronic insertion of funds into accounts for certain purposes). This applies to all goods and services and all governments. In the current issue of the monetization of government benefits in Russia, providing benefits in kind has the advantage of ensuring that the money is used for productive purposes.
Satish Chandra
Date: December 16, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
The Russian oil company, Yukos, has filed for bankruptcy protection in a United States court, though it has no assets in the United States. Residents of Eastern Ukraine should move a Russian court to void election plans in Ukraine on the grounds that the Ukrainian court had yielded to mob rule and American money and personnel had subverted government processes there-- and to send Russian forces to enforce its decrees. American courts have no jurisdiction in either matter but Russian courts-- and government-- do.
The Americans seem to feel that the Russian Foreign Ministry is their stronghold and can be relied upon to serve American interests over Russian interests. If so, the Americans have succeeded in subverting government processes in Russia also.
As a check on American world domination, the Warsaw Pact ought to be revived and should include all of its former constituents.
Satish Chandra
Date: December 5, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
A report in the New York Times quoted a Western diplomat as saying that judges in Kiev can be influenced with bribes and intimidation. But when they came out favoring a new election, it congratulated them for adopting the European Union's position; evidently the bribery/intimidation this time came from the West. The teacher of the discipline mentioned in the letter dated November 19, 2004, below, refers to a government's role as that of a parent to children and calls democracy and elections the worst system of government. That is the Indian view ( not what the politicians, secretly ruled by the C.I.A. --which, for example, got both Vajpayee and Rajiv Gandhi to agree to a plan to use India's population for AIDS vaccine development and, to this end, have the Research and Analysis Wing spread heroin addiction in India's tribal Northeast-- say). What is clear is that a separation of Ukraine from Russia will be a giant victory for American world domination and possibly a fatal blow to mankind. It must not be allowed to happen. I have shown in letters to the press over the past several years how most 'militant' groups operating in India are sponsored by the Research and Analysis Wing and it just carried out an explosion in Kashmir to promote partnership with Russia in fighting terrorism but Russia's focus at the moment should be the battle being waged by the West to separate Ukraine from it.
What is happening in Ukraine is an illustration of the advantage the United States has because of its willingness to use its nuclear arms (see letter dated June 27, 2004, below).
The foundation of American world domination is aggression. Unless other countries bring their counter-aggression above the American level, there is no hope for them.
Satish Chandra
Date: December 4, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
The Prime Minister's Principal Secretary, P. C. Alexander (see letter below), was rewarded with governorships of Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra and was set to become India's president and was replaced with A. P. J. Abdul Kalam only because the Congress party thought his becoming India's president will be an impediment to the party president becoming India's prime minister. The Principal Secretary was so miffed that he resigned the governorship of Maharashtra. All this while India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian has continued to suffer, with unimaginable injury to India and the world. This bugger should be hung up by the heels and asked why.
What I have said in letters below about the Shankaracharyas and India's own technology does not mean India's government should be given a veto in the UN, etc., because India's government is in Washington and works through the Research and Analysis Wing and politicians and others on its payroll. This collaborator regime (see letter dated January 5, 2004, below), regardless of the party forming the government, is the enemy of India and the population at large is also abjectly and profoundly enslaved to the Americans (it used to be the British). Giving it technology or a veto will seriously hurt Russia and other independent countries. Indian companies buying Russian oil assets, etc., will be Trojan Horses for the Americans.
Satish Chandra
Date: December 1, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
In a letter to the Indian press several years ago, I recounted an incident in 1979 when I went to the center in Cambridge (Massachusetts, USA) where the discipline mentioned in the letter dated November 19 '04, below, was taught and the American director of the center told me I will have to learn it in India because it involves "national power" (about which I wrote "Technology denial, even when the technology is from India!"). An American physicist who heads the countrywide organization of such centers in the United States refers to the forces involved in this technology as millions of times more powerful than the nuclear forces (involved in nuclear explosions). Everyone knows about American attempts ( such as the invasion of Iraq and threatened invasions of Iran, North Korea, etc.) to deny the nuclear technology to the 'lesser breeds'. The assault on the Shankaracharya is part of American attempts to deny India its own technology and destroy the repositories of such knowledge. The Research and Analysis Wing is playing the role about which I wrote to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi about American attempts to destroy another Indian scientist: 'A handful of the British had conquered and ruled India, largely with the help of Indians; that situation has essentially continued' (she wrote back she was "passing it on to my Principal Secretary to deal with it", but I never heard from the Principal Secretary, P. C. Alexander; instead, she was assassinated by the Research and Analysis Wing on orders of the American president; see letter dated November 24 '04, below).
Satish Chandra
Date: November 29, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
Once the Research and Analysis Wing fabricated an entire television interview with Pakistan's president Musharraf, using a look-alike in his place and broadcast it, as I pointed out in a letter to the press. I have also pointed out in past letters how it made telephone calls, purportedly from me, to The Week magazine once and sent a look-alike to some media organs when I was in India in 1996-97. RAW's fabrication of the Shankaracharya's 'confession', as part of the C.I.A.'s bid to destroy India's repositories of knowledge (see letter dated November 19, 2004, below) and establish American world domination, requires a more robust and immediate response than has been forthcoming.
About 1960, at a reception for a visiting Soviet delegation at a university, I said to my conversation partner 'let us talk in Hindi'. He said fine and immediately switched to Hindi. I almost fell back in surprise. The Soviets were also embarked on world conquest but of a very different kind, of sharing their utopia, unlike the Americans' world domination which aims at racial subjugation and exploitation, is toxic in a fundamental way and inimical to the survival of mankind. If Russia starts resisting American imperialism again, particularly in West Asia, the former muslim constituents of the Soviet Union will probably want back in.
Satish Chandra
Date: November 27, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
The Bajrang Dal has said it will give a "befitting reply" to the assault on the Shankaracharya. As I have said (letter dated November 19 '04, below), India's collaborator classes in all branches of government, in the press, etc., should be punished. Sacking the headquarters of the Research and Analysis Wing cannot be done without the participation of the armed forces which are themselves collaborators with India's enemies (see letter dated January 5 '04, below). However, the Times of India functions as an organ of the Research and Analysis Wing and has been running calculatedly scurrilous headlines about the Shankaracharya (the Hindustan Times and Indian Express are not far behind). Sacking their offices, forcing them to close and punishing their editors (capital punishment is warranted) will be a good first step.
The Bajrang Dal should forge ties with people in other countries, in Pakistan and West Asia, battling American world domination and collaborator classes in their own countries and rapidly induct light, medium and heavy weapons of all kinds to become a potent fighting force in the shortest possible time. The LTTE and other groups in Sri Lanka could be a model but these groups have been created and controlled by the Research and Analysis Wing. Avoiding infiltration and control by the latter will be the main challenge for the Bajrang Dal.
Satish Chandra
Date: November 24, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
In a letter to the Indian press over a decade ago, I said A. B. Vajpayee made his political career by having Deen Dayal Upadhyaya brutally murdered. In the same letter, I pointed out how Indira Gandhi had her son, Sanjay, murdered by the C.I.A. In another letter I pointed out how Vajpayee had his chauffeur-- whose body was found hanging from a ceiling fan in the BJP headquarters-- murdered. The current chief ministers of Tamil Nadu (who has been under the thumbs of the Research and Analysis Wing for years as the latter has held the threat of numerous cases against her, as I have said in past letters) and of Uttar Pradesh (who spoke up in support of the Shankaracharya's arrest on orders of the Research and Analysis Wing which has held the threat of crores in charges for unauthorized use of aircraft while Defence Minister over his head, as I have said in past letters) have been behind innumerable killings and assaults. After my letter dated November 19 '04, below, Vajpayee moved, on orders of the C.I.A., to pre-empt any robust and effective response to the assault on the Shankaracharya-- such as sacking the headquarters of the Reseach and Analysis Wing-- with a feeble, ineffective 'relay fast' to ensure that the Shankaracharya remained in police custody.
The assault on the Shankaracharya is part of the C.I.A.'s moves to establish American world domination ( see letter below). To focus on one or two killings or assaults when millions have been killed and hundreds of millions will be killed is stupid in the extreme.
Not all killings are equal; Indians (stupidly) killed thousands of Sikhs for the killing of Indira Gandhi (which was arranged by the Research and Analysis Wing on orders of the American president, Reagan, as I have said in a past letter). The assault on a Shankaracharya is infinitely more injurious to India than the assault on an Indira Gandhi.
To say that 'no one is above the law' is to put the "inferior Indian niggers" of the police and the judiciary (see letter dated January 5, 2004, below), aping their foreign masters and doing all they can to injure India, above a Shankaracharya. Whether or not this Shankaracharya ordered any killings, if Shankara destroys at times, so can a Shankaracharya.
Satish Chandra
Date: November 19, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
In a letter to the Indian press about a decade ago, I wrote something close to the following: 'Einstein's Theory of Relativity makes certain statements about the nature of gravity and inertia. Thousands of practitioners of a certain Indian psychological discipline (spiritual discipline, if you will) give spectacular demonstrations of the nature of gravity and inertia before which Einstein's achievement seems paltry indeed. They are seen on network TV and reported on in major newspapers. But never in the science pages or the science journals and never with seriousness and never with honesty. A conspiracy of silence prevails to deny it, or India, due recognition. The Indian press, run by their mental slaves and servants, is even more blind. But the really guilty ones are the ignoramuses who run Indian government and science but haven't got a clue as to these things or their stupendous implications.' The teacher of the above discipline has been a student of a Shankaracharya and referred, in a press conference a few months ago, to armed goons in India-- sent by the Research and Analysis Wing on orders of the C.I.A.-- beating up and breaking up groups of practitioners of the discipline a few years ago, forcing them to flee. The current assault on a Shankaracharya is the latest move in the C.I.A.'s bid to establish American world domination ( to the same end, the C.I.A. spiked medication used by an Indian practitioner of Western science to make him blind). Rivers of blood must flow of India's collaborator classes-- in all branches of government, in the press and elsewhere-- to repel and defeat this bid.
Satish Chandra
Date: July 14, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
A member of the new Indian Cabinet, Mani Shankar Aiyar, has been intimately involved in the C.I.A.'s day-to-day activities in India in recent years.
My proposal about money (see letter dated January 5, 2004, below) is the greatest development in the history of social science--greater than Marxism--and, arguably, the greatest development in human history. Countries applying Chandraism to their economies can greatly accelerate their progress by saying they are doing so.
Satish Chandra
Date: June 27, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
A summit of Arab leaders in Tunis, prompted by the letter below, resolved upon "reforms", but societies need not await reforms to gain strength and independence from science and technology, to shape themselves as they wish. Isaac Newton spent more time on fundamentalist studies of the Bible than on Physics, doing both concurrently, and accused his enemies of trying to "embroil me with women", but that did not prevent him from being a great scientist. Technology, however, is necessary but not sufficient for independence; if the perceived willingness--perceived by yourself and others--to use your arms is zero, their value--deterrent and other--is zero. The United States has a decisive advantage--ideological, economic and military--over the rest of the world because of its demonstrated willingness to use its nuclear arms.
Satish Chandra
Date: May 15, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
Starting about 10 hours before he tendered his resignation, Vajpayee, through the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, tried hard to induce the undersigned to issue a statement urging him to not resign (as I have said over the years, he, like Indira and Rajiv, has been a life-long paid agent of British and American intelligence agencies, with the Soviets providing some antidote which gave India a semblance of independence; Indira was made prime minister by the KGB's assassination of Shastri; and as Nehru admitted to U.S. ambassador Galbraith, he was a life-long agent of the British). No more than about 80,000 British, women and children included, ruled India for centuries. Nothing that can be said about the stupidity and slavisheness of Indians will be an exaggeration. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam got his start when the undersigned persuaded Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to start the Integrated Guided Missile Program. He was made President when the undersigned wrote "Indians show no awareness of the importance of research and of scientists(except mediocre ones rewarded by the white man) and are doomed". India's space program was expanded tenfold on guidance from the undersigned (see letter dated January 5, 2004, below). India's economic and technological salvation depends on the undersigned. Kalam should recognize the undersigned as his Guru. If he is Rashtrapati, the undersigned is Rashtrapita. He should announce that he will not invite any person of foreign origin to form the government and should invite the undersigned to India to provide further guidance.
Satish Chandra
Date: February 11, 2004
From: Satish Chandra, P.O. Box 381629, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA
Telephone: 617-407-0071 FAX: 617-825-4973
E-Mail: satchandra04@hotmail.com
Web Page: http://www.Psychotherapy.eBoard.com
Dear Editor:
China has adopted my proposal about money (see below). Also, within less than a week of my letter dated January 5, 2004, China announced plans for a manned landing on the moon by 2010. When Pakistan's current President came to power, I suggested in a letter to the press that my proposal about money be the centre-piece of Pakistan's new national policies, adding "Of course, this will force the cockroaches of the Indian government to emulate Pakistan or perish". Now the situation is that the monkeys of the American government must emulate China or perish. In response, to reduce China's motivation to develop its own technology, the United States has prompted the countries of the European Community to lift technology sanctions imposed on China-- a move that will not succeed. Also, as a first step, Bush has jacked-up the deficit for the upcoming budget to $521 billion. As a second step, he has proposed pumping trillions of dollars into the U.S. economy by putting the money into privatised Social Security accounts, raising the 'National Debt' for this purpose.
Satish Chandra
Date: January 5, 2004
Dear Editor:
Shortly after being made president, A.P.J. Abdul Kalam said that there were 10,000 scientists and engineers working in India's space program. He said this because, in a letter to the Indian press in 1996-97, I said "It is natural for Indians, both technical and non-technical, to feel dazzled and awed by the white man's achievements in science and technology, from nuclear weapons to landing men on the moon", but that my overwhelming conclusion after working at a U.S. aerospace giant was that these were ordinary people doing ordinary things, that the problem with India was that there were not enough people doing those things and that these numbers needed to be increased "tenfold and more" ; the figure of 10,000 represented such an increase. But, in a country of one billion, there should be at least one million scientists and engineers engaged in government-sponsored Research and Development, in every conceivable field (nanotechnology will be one of dozens of such fields one could think of). With the unlimited financial resources provided by my proposal about money (outlined in a letter published in three parts on March 11, 12 and 13, 1997 in The Observer of Business and Politics, New Delhi and in subsequent letters to the press), this is entirely feasible (see my example of building a new railway line; the money spent would have increased the Gross Domestic Product by several times it's amount even before the new railway line has carried a single paying passenger or a single ton of freight; the same applies to the money spent on research and development). India can easily produce 200,000 engineering graduates and Master of Science degree holders per year who can be trained to be research and development workers. Let us say 10% of these should be engaged in fundamental research--10,000 in Physics, 10,000 in Chemistry and so on. They can form a research community in themselves; their findings need not be shared with the outside world.
When the British left India in 1947, they left behind a puppet regime of the kind the Americans are setting up in Iraq and have set up in Afghanistan in the form of the Karzai government. If Indians are to emerge from their centuries of slavery and, in fact, survive, the above program is absolutely essential. India's civil service, police service and military are like the collaborator civil service, police, and military the Americans are setting up in Iraq. Their primary role is to maintain the white man's control over India. India's Constitution was written under a British administrator, Mountbatten, who continued as Governor General of "independent" India, very much as the Constitution of Iraq's puppet/collaborator goverment is being written under an American administrator ( India's Constitution unabashedly refers to the British king simply as "His Majesty" ). The problem is not the Constitution but the continued control of India's administration and intelligence agencies which continue to function as branches of British/American intelligence agencies. India's Research and Analysis Wing has in innumerable ways suppressed my proposal about money under which India's per capita income can exceed that of the United States in a matter of, say, 15 years. They will implement only those parts of it, in highly diluted form, for which they receive permission from the White Master. When an American Treasury Secretary said that India's GDP growth rate could be 10% per year, then the Research and Analysis Wing dared to advance a growth rate of 8%. India's population at large is equally enslaved. The Americans have disbanded the Iraqi armed forces and are creating a collaborator army; India's army is the collaborator army that helped the British rule India; all it's units and regiments, etc., have retained their identities and trace their origins to the British times. The extreme imbalance of power created by the white man's extreme technological superiority has led to an extremely fierce loyalty to him in the regime and the population at large (see my letter sequence from March, 2002 to April, 2003 about the "inferior Indian niggers" ). It is a thankless task to try to break their chains but I feel I should try.
Satish Chandra
-----------------------------------------------------------
Satish Chandra stood first amongst all branches of engineering in the merit-ranking exam at I.I.T., Kharagpur in 1961 and was nominated for the Best Institute Graduate of the Year award by the Department chairman in 1966. He won first prizes in Institute-wide competitions in English debating, Hindi debating and the Annual English Essay Contest in 1964-65 and was elected President of the Departmental society in his final year.
Among his achievements he lists:-
1. He can reasonably claim to be the foremost behavior scientist in the United States.
2. Laboratory research with rats, using operant conditioning procedures, discovering a new effect drastically modifying biological clocks with theoretical and practical applications to Biology, Medicine and Physics.
3. A new theory of relativity showing how observing organisms can drastically modify properties of the physical world relative to themselves at an everyday level.
4. His theory of money is in the process of revolutionizing Economics and public finance. It was responsible for the Council of Economic Advisers being thrown out of the White House and for Bush's statement in early 2003 that "Both parties in both houses of Congress" now understand that cutting taxes creates jobs (so long as the government does not make a corresponding reduction in the money it spends).
From 1975 on, he informally advised Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on India's domestic policies and international affairs.
For more information, see his web page: http://www.psychotherapy.eboard.com/